Answers that mention Peec AI

If your agency needs AI share of voice across many clients + polished, client-facing reports, I’d narrow the field to these:

My practical shortlist

1. AgencyAnalytics — best if reporting is the priority

Its AI Tracker is built directly into the agency reporting platform rather than being another standalone dashboard. It tracks client visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, including competitor share of voice. Crucially, the AI data can flow into the same white-labeled, automated client reports as SEO, PPC, analytics and social data. AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

2. Peec AI — best dedicated AI-visibility workflow for agencies

Peec is particularly interesting if AI visibility itself is becoming a service you sell. It supports separate client projects, competitor benchmarking, share of voice, branded dashboards, CSV/API export, and automated reporting. Its agency workflow can also generate per-client summaries and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

peec.ai

3. Profound — consider it for sophisticated/enterprise clients

Profound is more analytics-heavy and is positioned toward larger organizations. Current comparisons describe its agency functionality and deeper prompt/AI-search analytics as major differentiators, but the economics make more sense when individual client retainers justify a more expensive platform. AI Search Tools Geohats

4. Otterly — good lightweight starting point

If you mainly need to answer “How often is Client X mentioned by AI engines, and how does that compare with competitors?” without buying a much larger analytics platform, Otterly is worth evaluating. Current comparisons position it toward smaller/budget-conscious agencies. AI Search Tools Demand Local, Inc.

What I'd look for specifically

For an agency, don't evaluate these purely on the quality of their AI visibility score. The operational features matter more:

• Client isolation: separate prompts, competitors and reporting for every account.
• Share of voice: percentage of tracked AI responses in which the client appears versus competitors.
• Citation/source analysis: why the client is appearing, not merely whether it appears.
• Trend reporting: month-over-month visibility and competitor movement.
• White labeling: your logo/domain/branding rather than the software vendor's.
• Automated reports: scheduled PDFs, dashboards or slide decks.
• Exports/API: important if you eventually want your own agency dashboard.
• Multiple AI engines: ideally ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude rather than one model.
• Prompt-level drill-down: essential when a client asks, “Why did our share of voice drop?”

For your exact use case, I'd start by demoing AgencyAnalytics and Peec side-by-side. AgencyAnalytics is compelling if you want AI SOV to become another section of your existing monthly marketing report; Peec is compelling if you want to build a more specialized AI visibility/AEO reporting service. AgencyAnalytics Peec AI

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need PDF/PowerPoint reports or live dashboards, I can narrow this down further and compare the current pricing/per-client economics.

agencyanalytics.com

2. Peec AI — best dedicated AI-visibility workflow for agencies

Peec is particularly interesting if AI visibility itself is becoming a service you sell. It supports separate client projects, competitor benchmarking, share of voice, branded dashboards, CSV/API export, and automated reporting. Its agency workflow can also generate per-client summaries and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

peec.ai

3. Profound — consider it for sophisticated/enterprise clients

Profound is more analytics-heavy and is positioned toward larger organizations. Current comparisons describe its agency functionality and deeper prompt/AI-search analytics as major differentiators, but the economics make more sense when individual client retainers justify a more expensive platform. AI Search Tools Geohats

4. Otterly — good lightweight starting point

If you mainly need to answer “How often is Client X mentioned by AI engines, and how does that compare with competitors?” without buying a much larger analytics platform, Otterly is worth evaluating. Current comparisons position it toward smaller/budget-conscious agencies. AI Search Tools demandlocal.com

What I'd look for specifically

If your priority is agency workflow + multiple clients + AI share-of-voice tracking + polished reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My practical shortlist

1. Peec AI — probably the first demo I'd take

Peec is unusually explicit about the agency use case: one account can contain separate client workspaces, with unlimited client/team seats, automated reporting, share-of-voice tracking, competitor comparisons, CSV/API exports, and Looker Studio dashboards. Its agency plans currently start at $245/month for 3 clients, with higher tiers for additional clients. Peec AI Peec AI

The particularly useful part for an agency is the reporting workflow: Peec says its MCP can loop through client projects, compare visibility/SOV with the prior period, generate summaries, and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

peec.ai

2. Profound — if your clients are enterprise

Profound is more oriented toward deep enterprise analytics and broad answer-engine coverage. I'd look at it if you're selling sophisticated GEO/AEO reporting to large brands rather than simply needing an efficient reporting machine for 20 SMB clients. Current comparisons put its entry plans substantially below Enterprise but with considerably more limited engine coverage. Baarely

tryprofound.com

3. Promptwatch — worth a demo if you want reports plus action

Promptwatch is interesting if you don't want the product to stop at "your SOV went from 14% to 18%." Its positioning combines prompt tracking, citations/crawling and optimization/content workflows. Current agency-oriented offerings advertise multi-project support and automated reporting. AI Search Tools Best GEO Software

What I'd choose based on agency size

• 5–15 clients: Peec or Otterly
• 15–50+ clients: Peec is particularly interesting because of its client-workspace and reporting architecture.
• Enterprise SEO/GEO consultancy: Profound
• You want to turn visibility data into actual optimization work: Promptwatch
• You mainly need inexpensive monitoring: Otterly

One thing I'd specifically test in demos: don't just ask whether they have "reports." Ask to see the actual PDF/Slides/QBR output generated for one client, then ask how long it takes to produce the same report for 20 clients. That's where agency tools differ substantially.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 30, 100) and whether you want PDF reports, live white-label dashboards, or automated Google Slides, I can narrow this to 2–3 and compare their current agency pricing/features.

The particularly useful part for an agency is the reporting workflow: Peec says its MCP can loop through client projects, compare visibility/SOV with the prior period, generate summaries, and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

peec.ai

2. Profound — if your clients are enterprise

Profound is more oriented toward deep enterprise analytics and broad answer-engine coverage. I'd look at it if you're selling sophisticated GEO/AEO reporting to large brands rather than simply needing an efficient reporting machine for 20 SMB clients. Current comparisons put its entry plans substantially below Enterprise but with considerably more limited engine coverage. baarely.com

tryprofound.com

3. Promptwatch — worth a demo if you want reports plus action

Yes. This is now a fairly well-defined AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) reporting category, and several platforms are explicitly built for agencies.

Strong options

• llmpulse.ai — probably one of the closest matches. It tracks AI visibility, citations, competitors and prompts across multiple engines, with multi-client dashboards, white-label branding, custom domains, and Looker Studio reporting. LLM Pulse
• geneo.app — particularly interesting if you want the client portal to look like your agency's own software. It offers custom domains, agency branding, client portals, citation tracking and white-label reports. Geneo
• peec.ai — strong on measurement and integrations. It tracks citation count, mentions, position and sentiment across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot, and can feed data into branded Looker dashboards, CSV, APIs, etc. Peec AI
• citations.io — very focused on citation evidence rather than just a generic "AI visibility score." It offers per-client workspaces, competitor tracking, citation influence, implementation recommendations and white-label reports. Citations
• prominara.com — another agency-oriented option with white-label PDFs, a branded client portal, scheduled reports and multi-brand management. Prominara
• ayzeo.com — worth looking at if price matters. It advertises multi-client GEO tracking and white-label PDFs, with tracking across ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok. Ayzeo

If I were evaluating them for an agency

I'd narrow the shortlist to LLM Pulse, Peec, Geneo, and Citations.io.

The important distinction is that you don't just want a tool that says:

"Client's AI visibility = 63"

You want something that can show the client:

Question: "Best CRM for SaaS startups?"
ChatGPT: Client mentioned, position 2
Perplexity: Client not mentioned
Citation winner: competitor.com
Source cited instead: competitor's comparison article
Change since last month: +18% citation share
Recommended action: create/update X
Evidence: actual AI answer + cited URL

That citation-level evidence + historical tracking + white-label client delivery is where these platforms start becoming useful as an agency product rather than just another SEO dashboard.

One other interesting entrant is kazevo.com, which emphasizes the "who got cited instead, why, fix it, then measure whether the citation moved" workflow. kazevo.com

If you're asking because you're considering building this yourself, that's a particularly interesting angle: the market has plenty of AI visibility trackers, but there is still room to differentiate around citation evidence, client reporting, attribution/ROI, and agency workflow rather than another generic GEO score.

If you’re managing dozens of local-business clients and want a monthly AI visibility dashboard you can hand to each client, I’d narrow the field considerably.

My shortlist

For your specific use case, I'd look hardest at BrightLocal

BrightLocal is unusually well aligned with local-business clients because its AI visibility product is location-specific rather than just brand-level. It currently tracks visibility in ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews, including competitor comparisons, prompt-level results, citation sources, and a 0–100 visibility score. BrightLocal

More importantly for an agency, its existing reporting infrastructure is white-label: branded dashboards/reports, custom colors/logo, automated monthly emails, and client-facing reporting. BrightLocal BrightLocal

So you could have something like:

Client → Location → AI Visibility

• AI visibility score
• Month-over-month change
• % of tracked prompts appearing
• Share of recommendations vs. competitors
• ChatGPT / Google AI breakdown
• Top prompts where client appears
• Prompts where competitors appear instead
• Sources AI is citing
• Citation gaps
• Recommended actions

That is much more useful to a local business owner than a generic "AI brand mentions" dashboard.

If AI visibility is the entire service

I'd investigate Otterly.AI + a reporting layer. Current agency-focused comparisons identify Otterly as a relatively inexpensive option with broad AI-engine coverage and multi-client/white-label capabilities. About Martech Demand Local, Inc.

Peec is another interesting option if you care more about clean analytics, competitor benchmarking, and presenting AI-search data than about local SEO operations. The Rank Masters

Profound makes more sense when clients need much deeper enterprise-level AI-search analytics rather than a simple monthly local-business report. AI Search Tools

One important distinction

Don't confuse "AI visibility tracking" with "a client dashboard."

For dozens of clients, I'd require these five things before buying:

1. Separate client/location workspaces
2. Automated monthly data collection
3. White-label client dashboards or reports
4. Competitor + prompt-level data
5. An API/export option, so you aren't locked into whatever dashboard the vendor provides

Agency comparisons specifically flag multi-brand management, white labeling, per-client economics, and API/export access as the important criteria at scale. Spottlo

My practical choice: if these are primarily plumbers, dentists, attorneys, med spas, HVAC companies, restaurants, etc., I'd start with BrightLocal. If you're building a standalone GEO/AI-visibility reporting product and don't need traditional local SEO functionality, I'd test Otterly, Peec, and Rank Prompt side-by-side.

If you tell me roughly how many clients (e.g. 25, 50, 100) and whether you want a dashboard clients log into vs. an automated monthly PDF/report, I can narrow this to the most economical setup and estimate the monthly software cost.

Don't confuse "AI visibility tracking" with "a client dashboard."

For dozens of clients, I'd require these five things before buying:

For a boutique SEO/content agency, I’d look at this as two separate requirements:

1. Which client pages/domains are actually being cited by AI assistants?
2. Can I turn that data into a repeatable, client-friendly report?

My shortlist

Current 2026 comparisons similarly distinguish dedicated AI-monitoring products such as Otterly, Profound and Peec from SEO suites such as Ahrefs and Semrush. TechnologyAdvice ToolChase

If I were setting up a boutique agency

I'd start with Ahrefs Brand Radar if you're already an Ahrefs customer.

The particularly useful feature for your question is the Cited Pages reporting. Ahrefs can show which URLs are being cited, the prompts/responses associated with those citations, and historical citation performance. It also exposes citation data through an API, which is useful if you want to build your own client reporting layer. Ahrefs

Ahrefs is also unusually useful for answering the client question:

"Which of our pages are AI engines actually using as sources?"

rather than merely:

"Does AI mention our brand?"

Its current AI visibility dataset spans ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity and Google AI, with hundreds of millions of search-backed prompts. Ahrefs

I'd choose Otterly instead if AI visibility is becoming a standalone agency service. It is purpose-built around prompt tracking, mentions and citations rather than being an SEO suite with AI functionality bolted on. Current agency-oriented comparisons specifically highlight its multi-engine monitoring and reporting capabilities. TechnologyAdvice Otterly

The reporting stack I'd build

For each client, I'd want the monthly report to automatically produce:

• AI citation visibility: % of tracked prompts where the client's domain is cited
• Cited URLs: the actual pages receiving citations
• Citation count: citations by URL and by engine
• Top prompts: questions producing citations
• New/lost citations: month-over-month changes
• Competitor citations: which competing domains are being cited instead
• Engine breakdown: ChatGPT vs. Perplexity vs. Google AI Overviews vs. Gemini, etc.
• Content opportunities: prompts where competitors are cited but the client isn't
• Traditional SEO correlation: organic rankings/traffic for cited vs. non-cited pages

That last piece is particularly valuable for an agency because you can turn "AI visibility" into a content-performance story, rather than giving clients another vanity metric.

One important distinction

Don't buy a tool merely because it reports brand mentions. Make sure it exposes the source URL/page behind the answer.

That's the actionable data. For example:

Prompt: "Best accounting software for small nonprofits?"
AI answer: Client mentioned
Citation: /nonprofit-accounting-guide/

Now you can tell the client which asset is earning AI visibility and why that asset matters. Ahrefs explicitly supports this kind of cited-page analysis. Ahrefs Ahrefs

My practical recommendation:

• Already use Ahrefs → Brand Radar
• Want a dedicated, relatively lightweight agency AI-monitoring product → OtterlyAI
• Building a serious enterprise GEO practice → Profound
• Want maximum control → use an API-based tool and build the reporting in Looker Studio/your BI system

If you tell me roughly how many clients/domains you manage (e.g. 10, 30, 100) and whether you already use Ahrefs/Semrush, I can narrow this down to the most economical setup and show what the client report should look like.

That's the actionable data. For example:

Prompt: "Best accounting software for small nonprofits?"
AI answer: Client mentioned
Citation: /nonprofit-accounting-guide/

Now you can tell the client which asset is earning AI visibility and why that asset matters. Ahrefs explicitly supports this kind of cited-page analysis.

"Does AI mention our brand?"

Its current AI visibility dataset spans ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity and Google AI, with hundreds of millions of search-backed prompts.

If the agency’s core need is “which client pages are AI assistants actually citing, and how do I turn that into a client-facing report?”, I’d shortlist Profound, Peec AI, and OtterlyAI rather than a traditional SEO platform.

My shortlist

Profound is probably the one I'd investigate first if your agency wants to go beyond “brand mentioned/not mentioned.” Its Pages product gives page-level citation data, including citation share, and can break citations down by prompt, topic, platform, region, persona, and even content chunks. Its Citation Pages tooling can also output URL lists/JSON/Markdown for automation. Profound Help Center Profound Help Center

tryprofound.com

Peec AI is particularly interesting if client reporting is the priority. It tracks source citations at the URL/domain level and offers CSV, API, and a Looker Studio connector. Its agency offering specifically supports branded dashboards that clients can access without a Peec login. Peec AI Peec AI

peec.ai

OtterlyAI is another strong option. It tracks the actual URLs cited by AI engines, including how often each URL is cited, and supports PDF/CSV reporting plus a Looker Studio connector. Its current platform tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude. Otterly Otterly

otterly.ai

What I'd choose for a boutique agency

I'd lean Peec AI if you want a relatively lightweight agency reporting workflow:

Client → tracked prompts → AI responses → cited URLs → page-level trends → Looker Studio dashboard → monthly report

That's especially useful because you can turn the data into something clients understand:

• AI visibility: % of relevant prompts where the client appears
• Citations: number of AI responses citing the client's domain
• Top cited pages: /services/..., /blog/..., /guides/...
• Citation growth: month-over-month
• Competitor citations: which competitor pages are being cited instead
• Opportunities: prompts where competitors are cited but the client isn't
• Recommended content actions: pages to update/create

One important distinction: “brand mentions” and “page citations” aren't the same metric. Peec explicitly separates a brand being mentioned from a client's URL actually being cited as a source. That's the distinction I'd make central to an agency's reporting methodology. Peec AI

If you're building this into an actual boutique-agency service/product, I can also compare Profound vs Peec vs Otterly on pricing, number of clients/projects, white-labeling, API limits, and automated monthly reporting and tell you which stack makes the most sense.

Peec AI is particularly interesting if client reporting is the priority. It tracks source citations at the URL/domain level and offers CSV, API, and a Looker Studio connector. Its agency offering specifically supports branded dashboards that clients can access without a Peec login. Peec AI Peec AI

peec.ai

OtterlyAI is another strong option. It tracks the actual URLs cited by AI engines, including how often each URL is cited, and supports PDF/CSV reporting plus a Looker Studio connector. Its current platform tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude. Otterly Otterly

otterly.ai

What I'd choose for a boutique agency

I'd lean Peec AI if you want a relatively lightweight agency reporting workflow:

Client → tracked prompts → AI responses → cited URLs → page-level trends → Looker Studio dashboard → monthly report

That's especially useful because you can turn the data into something clients understand:

• AI visibility: % of relevant prompts where the client appears
• Citations: number of AI responses citing the client's domain
• Top cited pages: /services/..., /blog/..., /guides/...
• Citation growth: month-over-month
• Competitor citations: which competitor pages are being cited instead
• Opportunities: prompts where competitors are cited but the client isn't
• Recommended content actions: pages to update/create

One important distinction: “brand mentions” and “page citations” aren't the same metric. Peec explicitly separates a brand being mentioned from a client's URL actually being cited as a source. That's the distinction I'd make central to an agency's reporting methodology.

If the agency needs ongoing AI citation tracking + client-ready executive reporting, I’d shortlist these:

• agencyanalytics.com — probably the most natural fit if the agency already uses AgencyAnalytics. It tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, benchmarks competitors, and puts the AI data alongside SEO/PPC/social metrics. It also supports client-ready recurring reports. AgencyAnalytics
• peec.ai — strong agency/multi-brand option focused specifically on AI visibility, prompts, citations and competitive share of voice. Recent comparisons identify it as particularly suited to agencies and mid-market teams. Bloomiro Arbling
• tryprofound.com — better suited to larger/enterprise programs where you want deeper citation intelligence, broader AI-engine coverage and sophisticated analysis. Benchline Reports
• otterly.ai — a lower-cost option for tracking AI mentions/citations and visibility over time; worth considering if the agency has a lot of smaller clients. Bloomiro Geohats

What I'd choose for an agency

If the requirement is specifically “track each client's citation movement and turn it into a monthly executive summary”, I'd lean toward AgencyAnalytics if you want the reporting workflow integrated with your existing agency reporting stack. Its AI Tracker is explicitly designed around client reporting and portfolio-scale management. AgencyAnalytics

If AI citations/GEO are the core service you're selling, rather than one component of a broader SEO report, Peec AI or Profound are worth evaluating for the deeper AI-specific analytics. Bloomiro Benchline Reports

A good executive report should reduce the raw data to something like:

• AI visibility: 34% → 47% this month
• Citation share: +12% MoM
• Competitive movement: 2 competitors gained/ lost visibility
• Important prompts: where the client is appearing or disappearing
• Citation sources: which pages/domains AI engines are citing
• Business interpretation: 2–3 sentences explaining what changed
• Actions: 3 prioritized recommendations for the next month

If you tell me how many clients the agency manages and whether you need white-label/PDF/email reports, I can narrow this to the 2–3 platforms that fit that workflow.

For an agency, I’d shortlist OtterlyAI, Peec AI, and Profound. seocounselors.comayzeo.com

• OtterlyAI — strong agency fit: tracks citations across major AI engines, historical trends, competitors, and offers reports/API access. otterly.ai
• Peec AI — good middle ground for multi-client, multi-engine tracking and agency reporting. seocounselors.comayzeo.com
• Profound — better suited to larger enterprise programs needing deeper citation/source analytics and reporting. seocounselors.com

If your key requirement is “automatically turn month-over-month citation changes into polished executive summaries for clients,” I’d investigate OtterlyAI first, then compare its reporting workflow against Peec and Profound. www.therankmasters.com

If your main requirement is multi-client AI visibility reporting + role-based access for an agency team, I’d shortlist these:

• otterly.ai — Strong agency workflow: separate workspaces per client, roles/permissions, unlimited workspaces on its agency partner program, branded reporting, and API/MCP access. Otterly AI Otterly AI
• indexly.ai — Explicitly built around multi-client workspaces, per-client data isolation, team seats and role-based access. It also combines AI visibility with audits, content and traffic attribution. Indexly
• scoutllm.ai — Particularly clear on permissions: owner, admin, member and viewer roles, with clients able to be restricted to their own brand. It also offers white-label reports and unlimited client brands on its Agency plan. Scout LLM
• outercite.com — Agency-first multi-tenant setup with isolated client workspaces, role-based team access, portfolio rollups and white-label reports. Its published Scale partner plan supports up to 50 client workspaces. Outercite
• peec.ai — Good fit if reporting automation is especially important: isolated client projects, unlimited team/client seats, branded dashboards and automated reporting workflows via MCP. Peec AI

What I'd look at first

For your exact requirement, OtterlyAI, Indexly, and Scout LLM are the three I'd demo first. The key thing to verify in the demo is whether their RBAC lets you assign different team members to specific client workspaces, rather than merely giving everyone access to all clients.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you need white-label client portals, I can narrow this to the most suitable 1–2 platforms and compare pricing/features.

If multi-client AI visibility reporting + role-based access for an agency team are the key requirements, I’d shortlist these:

• indexly.ai — Best overall fit. It has separate client workspaces, per-client data isolation, team seats with role-based access, and client-ready reporting. It also tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, and Google AI Overviews. Indexly Indexly
• scoutllm.ai — Best for granular team/client permissions. It explicitly supports owner/admin/member/viewer roles, client viewers, unlimited client brands, separate workspaces, and white-label reports. Scout LLM
• outercite.com — Best if white-labeling is especially important. It offers isolated client workspaces, a portfolio dashboard, role-based access, and branded reports/emails/share pages. Its agency plan is structured around up to 50 client workspaces. Outercite
• risn.ai — Good for a larger agency operation. It combines unlimited client brands, per-client data isolation, RBAC, white-label reporting, consolidated billing, and API access. RISN AI
• peec.ai — Strong reporting/workflow option. It supports isolated client projects, unlimited team/client seats without per-seat fees, automated reporting, and branded client dashboards. Peec AI

My pick

Indexly would be my first trial if your primary workflow is:

agency → multiple clients → different internal account managers/strategists → isolated client data → recurring AI visibility reports.

Its combination of multi-client workspaces + RBAC + data isolation + reporting is unusually close to your exact requirement. Indexly

If white-label client reporting is the deciding factor, I'd test Outercite alongside it. If granular user roles are the deciding factor, test Scout LLM. Outercite Scout LLM

If you tell me roughly how many clients and agency users you need (e.g. 20 clients / 8 users), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 based on likely pricing and permissions.

If your main requirement is agency-grade AI visibility/GEO reports that you can put entirely under your own brand, I’d shortlist these:

My shortlist

1. Ayzeo — strongest for polished client reports

Ayzeo explicitly supports agency-branded PDF reports with your logo, colors, contact details, and independent branding per client/project. Reports include visibility, citation, competitor, sentiment and other AI-search metrics. Ayzeo

ayzeo.com

2. ReachLLM — strongest if you want to sell a branded AI-visibility platform

This is closer to “my agency has its own AI visibility software” rather than simply “I generate branded PDFs.” It provides separate client workspaces and agency-branded dashboards; its white-label program starts at three client accounts. ReachLLM

reachllm.com

3. Sailiently — interesting if you don't want another large subscription

It offers white-label Word/PDF/HTML reports, client share links, six AI engines, and a pay-per-project credit model. Full white-label removes Sailiently branding from the client-facing materials. Sailiently

sailiently.com

4. Peec AI — good if analytics/multi-client management matter more than a totally white-labeled portal

Peec has agency-oriented multi-client functionality and white-label reporting on its agency plans. Baarely Linkeddit

peec.ai

5. Rankscale — worth looking at for a white-labeled dashboard

Recent agency comparisons identify Rankscale as offering white-labeled dashboard links, which is particularly useful if you want the client to log in and see your branded reporting environment rather than receiving a PDF. Linkeddit

One important distinction

I'd decide between three different products before choosing:

• Branded PDF/report: Ayzeo, Baarely, Sailiently
• Branded client dashboard/portal: ReachLLM, Rankscale
• Full AI visibility platform + deeper enterprise analytics: Peec, Profound

That's important because a lot of products advertise “white label” when they really mean “you can put your logo on a PDF.” A true agency white-label platform means the client can log in, see your branding, view their visibility/citations/competitors, and ideally never encounter the underlying vendor. SEO for GPT

If you tell me roughly how many clients you want to manage (e.g. 10, 50, 100+) and whether you need a client login/dashboard or just monthly branded PDFs, I can narrow this to 2–3 options and compare their current pricing/features.

ayzeo.com

2. ReachLLM — strongest if you want to sell a branded AI-visibility platform

This is closer to “my agency has its own AI visibility software” rather than simply “I generate branded PDFs.” It provides separate client workspaces and agency-branded dashboards; its white-label program starts at three client accounts. ReachLLM

reachllm.com

3. Sailiently — interesting if you don't want another large subscription

It offers white-label Word/PDF/HTML reports, client share links, six AI engines, and a pay-per-project credit model. Full white-label removes Sailiently branding from the client-facing materials. sailiently.com

sailiently.com

4. Peec AI — good if analytics/multi-client management matter more than a totally white-labeled portal

Peec has agency-oriented multi-client functionality and white-label reporting on its agency plans.

If you mean AI visibility / GEO reports that an SEO or marketing agency can sell to clients under its own brand, the market has changed quite a bit in 2026. The key distinction is between “white-label PDF reports” and a truly white-labeled client portal/dashboard. SEO for GPT GeoVector

Shortlist

What I'd look at first

1. Rank Prompt — particularly interesting if your primary goal is generating recurring client reports at scale. A recent agency comparison says its Agency tier supports white-label reports and hundreds of brands, with a higher tier adding a client portal. Rank Prompt

2. Ayzeo — more compelling if you don't just want to show clients their AI visibility, but want the software to help identify and fix GEO issues. Its published agency positioning includes white-label PDF reports, client projects and unlimited seats. Ayzeo Ayzeo

3. Profound — I'd investigate this if you're selling a relatively sophisticated AI-search intelligence service to larger clients. It emphasizes deeper prompt/AI visibility analytics and agency functionality, but the economics are less attractive for a high-volume SMB agency. AxiomAI AI Search Tools

4. Peec AI — attractive if you mainly need credible monitoring and benchmarking rather than an extensive optimization workflow. Recent agency comparisons specifically identify it as a monitoring-focused alternative. Ayzeo The Rank Masters

5. Otterly.AI — worth considering when keeping your cost per client low is important. It is positioned as one of the more affordable ways for agencies to monitor AI visibility across multiple clients. BusinessMCP AI Search Tools

One thing I'd be careful about

Don't buy based on the words “white label” alone.

For an agency, I'd require these five things:

• Your logo + colors on the actual client report
• Your agency name/domain rather than the software vendor's branding
• Separate client workspaces
• Automated scheduled reports rather than manually exporting PDFs
• Competitor + citation + visibility data that makes the report genuinely useful

Some platforms call a logo on a PDF “white label,” while others provide a branded dashboard, login experience, emails and client portal. Those are very different products. GeoVector SEO for GPT

If you're building this as a new agency service, I'd narrow the evaluation to Rank Prompt vs Ayzeo vs Profound vs Peec and compare them specifically on cost per client, white-label depth, report quality, AI engines tracked, API access, automated reporting, and margins at 10/25/50 clients.

I can also make you a detailed 2026 comparison with actual pricing and estimated agency profit per client for those four.

3. Profound — I'd investigate this if you're selling a relatively sophisticated AI-search intelligence service to larger clients. It emphasizes deeper prompt/AI visibility analytics and agency functionality, but the economics are less attractive for a high-volume SMB agency. axiomai.uk ai-search-tools.com

4. Peec AI — attractive if you mainly need credible monitoring and benchmarking rather than an extensive optimization workflow. Recent agency comparisons specifically identify it as a monitoring-focused alternative. Ayzeo therankmasters.com

5. Otterly.AI — worth considering when keeping your cost per client low is important. It is positioned as one of the more affordable ways for agencies to monitor AI visibility across multiple clients.

One thing I'd be careful about

Don't buy based on the words “white label” alone.

For an agency, I'd require these five things:

If your core workflow is “measure AI visibility → publish/update content → re-measure the same queries → show the client the change,” I’d shortlist these:

• citenzo.com — Probably the closest match to your exact requirement. It explicitly supports before/after lift, visibility score, share of voice, competitor comparisons, multi-client projects, and white-label client reports. It also tracks several major AI surfaces. Citenzo
• peec.ai — Stronger fit if you're running a larger agency operation. It offers isolated client workspaces, automated reporting, branded dashboards, and comparisons against previous periods; it also supports API/CSV workflows for custom reporting. Peec AI
• traqer.ai — Particularly interesting for content-update measurement: it keeps run history and lets you compare dates side-by-side, with weekly reports showing which topics moved after content/mention changes. Traqer
• gumshoe.ai — Good if you want a more data/reporting-oriented system. It tracks visibility across 11 AI models, supports scheduled runs, client-accessible dashboards, CSV/JSON/API exports, and agency reporting workflows. Gumshoe AI
• seerly.app — Useful if client defensibility matters: reports retain the underlying AI responses, support fixed-prompt baselines, date comparisons, competitor benchmarking, white-label branding, and scheduled PDF/web reports. Seerly

My pick for your use case

Start with Citenzo if the main product you're selling is “we improved your content, and here's the measured AI visibility lift.” Its positioning is unusually close to that before/after workflow. Citenzo

If you're building a larger multi-client GEO/AI-search reporting operation, I'd test Peec AI alongside it because of its client workspaces, automation, dashboards, and API/reporting infrastructure. Peec AI

One thing I'd insist on in a trial: the tool must re-run the identical prompt set after the content change, rather than comparing two arbitrary snapshots. Otherwise, a reported “lift” can be caused by changes in prompts, models, competitors, or sampling rather than your content. Seerly and Digraph explicitly emphasize fixed/repeatable measurement frames for this reason. Seerly digraph.dev

If you tell me how many clients you manage and whether you want white-label PDFs, a dashboard, or both, I can narrow this to 2–3 tools and compare pricing/features.

If your agency’s core workflow is “we changed the content → did AI visibility actually improve? → show the client evidence,” I’d shortlist these:

• jujugeo.com — Probably the closest fit to your exact use case. It explicitly supports multi-client/white-label reporting, identifies competitors that get cited instead, helps create content fixes, and reports before/after citation changes after publishing. jujuGEO
• seerly.app — Strong choice if reporting is the priority. It keeps a baseline and subsequent runs, supports fixed prompts for defensible before/after comparisons, agency branding, scheduled reports, PDF/web formats, and competitor benchmarking. Seerly
• gumshoe.ai — Good if you want broader AI-model coverage and an API for building your own agency reporting/dashboard layer. It supports recurring reports, competitor benchmarking, citation analysis and 11 AI models. Gumshoe AI
• peec.ai — Worth considering for straightforward visibility tracking and agency reporting. It has historical prompt data and white-label reporting on agency plans, although it is more of an analytics/monitoring platform than a complete content-update attribution workflow. Baarely The Rank Masters
• tryprofound.com — Better suited to larger agencies/enterprise programs needing deeper AI-search analytics and multi-engine coverage, rather than a lightweight client-reporting workflow. AxiomAI

What I'd look for

The important distinction is historical tracking vs. true content-update measurement. A useful agency tool should let you:

1. Lock a set of client-specific prompts.
2. Capture the baseline before a content change.
3. Record the content/URL change and date.
4. Re-run the same prompts after Google/ChatGPT/Perplexity/etc. have had time to crawl the change.
5. Compare visibility, mentions, citations, competitors and ideally the actual AI responses.
6. Generate a branded client report showing “before → change made → after.”

That last part is important because many AI-visibility products can show that visibility changed, but don't establish a clean connection between a particular content update and the subsequent change. AI Search Tools

For an SEO/content agency specifically, I'd start by demoing jujuGEO and Seerly. They appear closest to the workflow you're describing rather than simply being AI-visibility dashboards.

If you tell me how many clients you manage and whether you need white-label PDF reports, Looker Studio, or an API, I can narrow this to 2–3 options and compare pricing/features.

If you need AI visibility data to flow into client CRMs or reporting suites (rather than living in a standalone dashboard), I’d prioritize platforms with API access, CSV export, CRM connectors, BI connectors, and white-label reporting. A few options worth evaluating:

My shortlist by use case

• Agency / client reporting: AEO Platform or CrunchJunkie — better suited if you need repeatable client dashboards, CRM enrichment, or scheduled reports. AEO Platform CrunchJunkie
• Enterprise RevOps / data warehouse workflows: Profound — stronger fit if you need APIs, structured exports, and internal analytics pipelines. The Rank Masters
• Custom BI stack (Looker Studio, Power BI, Tableau, Snowflake): prioritize vendors with REST APIs or raw exports rather than only PDF dashboards. AEO Platform Presenc AI

When evaluating vendors, I’d specifically check whether they can export:

• AI mentions/citations by prompt
• share of voice vs competitors
• sentiment or recommendation context
• model/source breakdown (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, etc.)
• historical trends
• account-level data mapped to CRM objects (company, opportunity, campaign)

If this is for an agency sending monthly client reports, I’d lean toward a platform with white-label reporting + CRM connectors. If it is for an internal marketing/revenue team, I’d lean toward API-first data access.