Answers that do not mention Peec AI

For a marketing agency, I’d shortlist these:

• AgencyScope — specifically built for SEO/GEO agencies; recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with white-label PDF reports and prompt-level evidence. AgencyScope AgencyScope agencyscope.ai
• Tower GEO — multi-client monitoring, competitor benchmarking, and white-label PDFs/live dashboards across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. Tower GEO towergeo.com
• AdventyX — broader engine coverage including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Grok, with multi-client dashboards and reporting. Adventyx adventyx.ai
• GeoBuddy — agency-oriented monitoring with white-label reports and competitor/trend tracking. geobuddy.co geobuddy.co

If your main requirement is polished client-ready reporting, AgencyScope is particularly aligned with that use case.

For a marketing agency, you’re looking for an AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) reporting platform — something that can monitor how a client’s brand appears in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, etc., and turn that into a client-facing report. TrustData TechnologyAdvice

Here are the main tools agencies are using:

What I’d evaluate for an agency workflow

Look for these capabilities:

• Custom prompt sets

Example: “What are the best accounting firms in Austin?” or “Which CRM is best for startups?” rather than only generic brand searches.

• Multi-client management

You want separate workspaces/brands so every client can have their own dashboard.

• White-label exports

PDF reports, logos, agency branding, and scheduled email reports are important for retainers.

• Competitor visibility

Clients usually care less about “AI score” and more about:

• “Are we appearing?”
• “Who appears instead of us?”
• “Which sources are AI systems using?”
• Citation tracking

A brand mention is useful, but knowing which websites AI systems rely on gives you an optimization roadmap. Ahrefs

A practical agency stack

A common setup would be:

1. AI visibility tracker → Profound, Otterly, Visibrand, SynectGEO, or Ahrefs
2. SEO/content data → Semrush or Ahrefs
3. Reporting layer → Looker Studio, AgencyAnalytics, DashThis, or the tool’s own client portal
4. Monthly deliverable:

• AI visibility score
• Share of voice vs. competitors
• Top prompts where client appears
• Missing opportunities
• Recommended content/actions

If you’re selling this as a monthly agency service, I’d prioritize tools with white-label dashboards and multi-brand management rather than just the cheapest tracker. Visibrand

If your priority is multi-client AI share of voice + polished, client-facing reporting, I’d shortlist these:

The three I'd demo first

1. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — particularly compelling if you already use AgencyAnalytics for SEO/PPC/social reporting. AI visibility sits alongside the rest of the client's performance data rather than creating another reporting ecosystem. It explicitly tracks share of voice and competitor visibility and produces client-ready reports. AgencyAnalytics

2. Promptwatch — worth looking at if your agency needs API/Data Studio connectivity as well as client dashboards. It supports multi-client management, white-label dashboards, client portals, and integrations. Promptwatch

3. Zumi — especially interesting for your specific "export polished reports" requirement. It offers agency-branded PDF and CSV exports, isolated client workspaces, SOV/mention-rate reporting, and coverage of up to nine AI engines. Zumi

One important distinction

I'd separate "AI visibility tracker" from "GEO execution platform."

If you mainly need to answer:

"How much of the AI conversation does Client X own, versus Competitors A/B/C, and can I put that into a beautiful monthly report?"

then AgencyAnalytics, Zumi, Promptwatch, Tower GEO, or Citenzo are the relevant category.

If you also want the software to tell your team what content/citations to change to increase visibility, look harder at GetIntel or similar execution-oriented platforms. GetIntel, for example, combines SOV tracking with drafted fixes and has a Looker Studio connector. GetIntel

My practical buying checklist: make sure the platform supports custom prompts per client, competitor tracking, historical SOV, engine-by-engine breakdowns, citation/source tracking, scheduled refreshes, white-label PDF, CSV/API export, and separate client workspaces. Those features matter much more for an agency than a flashy overall "AI visibility score."

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you use Looker Studio/AgencyAnalytics, I can narrow this to 2–3 and compare their current pricing and agency limits.

Yes. A new category of tools is emerging around AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) monitoring. Several platforms are specifically aimed at agencies that need to:

• Track whether client brands appear in AI answers
• Monitor citations/sources used by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, etc.
• Compare clients against competitors
• Produce white-label client reports or dashboards
• Turn AI visibility into a recurring agency service

Some options:

A typical agency workflow with these looks like:

1. Create a client profile

• Brand
• Website
• Competitors
• Target prompts/questions
• Run scheduled AI checks

• “Best accounting firms in [city]”
• “Top tools for [category]”
• “Alternatives to [competitor]”
• Collect evidence

• Was the client mentioned?
• Where did the AI model get its information?
• Which domains were cited?
• Which competitors appeared?
• Generate client deliverables

• Branded PDF
• Client dashboard
• Monthly AI visibility report
• Recommendations

If you are building an agency offer, I would look closely at whether the platform provides:

• ✅ true white-label branding (logo/domain/colors)
• ✅ saved prompt libraries per client
• ✅ historical trend reporting
• ✅ citation/source URLs (not just mentions)
• ✅ competitor comparisons
• ✅ API or Looker Studio export
• ✅ multi-client pricing that does not explode with every new account

The biggest distinction is that some tools are closer to SEO/GEO analytics platforms, while others are essentially report-generation systems for agencies. For a traditional SEO/content agency adding an AI visibility retainer, the latter category is often the better fit. AgencyScope LLM Pulse

I can also put together a comparison by price, number of clients supported, white-label capability, and best fit (SEO agency vs PR agency vs SaaS marketing agency) if that would help.

Yes. Several platforms now target agencies that need AI citation/visibility monitoring + white-label client reporting. Options include:

• citations.io — Built specifically for agencies: multi-client workspaces, AI citation tracking across ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini/Claude, competitor tracking, and branded reports. Citations
• agencyscope.ai — Focused on recurring agency reporting: prompt monitoring, evidence capture, and white-label PDF reports. AgencyScope
• outercite.com — Agency/reseller workflow with client workspaces, branded reports, citation tracking, and AI visibility analysis. Outercite
• jujugeo.com — Tracks where competitors are cited instead of clients and provides agency-branded reporting workflows. jujuGEO
• aeovisor.com — Agency plan with multi-brand tracking and white-label PDF reports. AEOVisor
• citetrackai.com — Offers agency reporting, white-label branding, and client-level AI visibility tracking. CiteTrack AI

For an SEO/GEO agency, I’d shortlist based on workflow:

• Need polished recurring client reports: AgencyScope, Citations.io
• Need many clients/workspaces: Outercite, CiteTrack AI
• Need citation-gap analysis (who AI cites instead): jujuGEO, Citations.io

The category is still new, so I’d test report quality and citation accuracy with a few of your actual client brands before committing.

For a small digital agency, I’d shortlist these:

• daylytix.com — probably the closest fit if your goal is client-ready PowerPoint reporting. It specifically advertises branded PowerPoint and PDF reports, client portals, scheduled re-audits, and combines SEO, GSC, GA4, and AI data. Daylytix
• gumshoe.ai — stronger if you primarily want AI-search visibility analytics (visibility scores, competitors, citations, AI models). It exports CSV/JSON and provides an API, so you can feed the data into your existing PowerPoint workflow. Gumshoe AI
• indexly.ai — particularly interesting if by “AI crawler analytics” you mean actual crawler activity: which bots visit, which URLs they fetch, and how often. It also offers branded agency reports and APIs. Indexly
• citaeotion.ai — another agency-oriented option specifically focused on white-label AI crawler analytics, including bot/page/status data and branded reports. Citaeotion
• goreportpilot.com — worth considering if the priority is automatically generating an editable PPTX, rather than having the crawler analytics platform itself produce the deck. It supports CSV uploads, AI-generated narrative, branded PPTX/PDF exports, and scheduled reporting. GoReportPilot

My pick

If your workflow is “collect AI crawler/AI-search data → turn it into a polished client presentation with minimal agency labor,” I'd start with Daylytix.

If you specifically need raw crawler evidence—e.g. GPTBot hit 142 URLs, ClaudeBot hit 83, these five URLs are being ignored/blocked—I'd look harder at Indexly or citAEOtion, then use a reporting layer for the PowerPoint.

One important distinction: AI crawler analytics (bots fetching your site) and AI visibility analytics (whether ChatGPT/Perplexity/etc. actually mention or cite the client) are related but different datasets. For an agency deck, having both makes the story considerably more useful: “AI systems are crawling these pages → these pages are/aren't earning citations → here’s what we recommend changing.” Indexly Citaeotion

If you tell me your approximate number of clients and monthly budget (e.g. <$100/mo, $100–300, $300+), I can narrow this to 2–3 options and compare PPTX export, white-labeling, crawler data, AI citations, GA4/GSC integration, and pricing.

For a small digital agency specifically focused on AI crawler analytics, I’d look at citAEOtion first.

• citaeotion.ai — measures actual AI crawler activity from server traffic, including which bots hit which pages, crawl frequency, crawler type, HTTP status, and training vs. search/answer crawls. It also supports white-label agency reports, multi-site reporting, and portfolio exports. citAEOtion citAEOtion
• daylytix.com — worth considering if you want a broader agency SEO/GEO platform rather than crawler analytics alone. It explicitly offers branded PowerPoint reports, which is a major advantage for your particular requirement. Daylytix
• reportcue.com — more of an all-purpose agency reporting layer. It combines SEO, GA4, GSC and AI traffic and exports branded reports/decks, so it could be useful if crawler data needs to sit alongside conventional marketing KPIs. ReportCue

My pick

If your deliverable is essentially:

“Here’s how ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, etc. are crawling your client's site, what they're crawling, and what that means.”

I'd choose citAEOtion for the underlying analytics, but Daylytix if native PowerPoint output is the deciding factor.

One caveat: citAEOtion's published reporting is white-label/export-oriented, whereas Daylytix explicitly advertises PowerPoint reports. So if you literally need a .pptx that an account manager can open and present with minimal editing, Daylytix currently looks like the more direct fit. Daylytix citAEOtion

If you tell me roughly how many clients/sites you manage (e.g. 5, 20, 50), I can compare the 3–5 best options on price, PowerPoint export, white-labeling, crawler accuracy, and client presentation quality.

If you mean one tool that combines AI-assistant visibility/ranking data with conventional SEO metrics for agency client reporting, a few current options stand out:

• Rankability — specifically built around combining traditional search rankings with AI-answer visibility, AI citations, local and other search surfaces in a unified reporting framework. Rankability Rankability
• SE Ranking — combines traditional keyword rank tracking with AI Overviews/AI Mode monitoring and agency reporting. Rankability
• Semrush — useful if you already use it for rankings, backlinks, traffic, competitor research and reporting, with AI visibility capabilities added to the broader SEO suite. Rankability
• Rankfender — explicitly combines AI visibility with Google Search Console and GA4 data in client reports. RankFender
• AgencyAnalytics — excellent as the reporting layer: it combines rankings, GSC, GA4, backlinks and other sources, and can incorporate custom data, but you'd generally need a separate AI-visibility source. AgencyAnalytics
• DashThis — similarly works well as an aggregation/reporting layer, pulling data from SEO and marketing platforms into white-label client dashboards. DashThis

If the key requirement is literally “AI assistant rankings + traditional SEO metrics in the same client report,” I'd look first at Rankability, SE Ranking, or Rankfender. If you already have an AI-visibility tracker and mainly need polished agency reporting, AgencyAnalytics or DashThis can serve as the reporting layer. DashThis Rankability RankFender

If you tell me what you mean by “AI assistant ranking” (ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini mentions, citations, share of voice, answer position, etc.), I can narrow this down to the 2–3 tools that fit an agency workflow.

If you mean one agency reporting platform that puts AI-assistant visibility next to conventional SEO metrics, AgencyAnalytics is the closest fit I found. Its AI Tracker puts visibility from ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic, and revenue data, and those metrics can flow into the same automated client reports. AgencyAnalytics

Another option is Rankfender, which explicitly says it combines AI-visibility metrics with traditional Google Search Console and GA4 data in the same report. RankFender

If your priority is AI visibility + existing SEO reporting, I'd distinguish them this way:

• AgencyAnalytics — broader established agency reporting stack; AI data is an additional channel alongside 85+ integrations. AgencyAnalytics
• Rankfender — more explicitly designed around combining AI-search metrics with traditional SEO data. RankFender
• datareport.ai — specifically positions GEO reporting as Google rankings + AI rankings in one client report. DataReport
• SearchChamp — aims to combine keyword research, rank tracking, audits, and AI visibility in one agency platform. SearchChamp

If by “AI assistant ranking data” you specifically mean rankings/mentions in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, rather than AI Overviews, I can narrow this to the 3 tools that best fit an agency's existing SEO client-reporting workflow.

For dozens of local business clients, I’d prioritize software that has:

• multi-client workspaces
• white-label dashboards/PDFs
• scheduled monthly reporting
• local query tracking (city + service intent)
• competitor comparisons
• evidence (which prompts, AI engines, citations/sources)
• an easy client-facing story (“visibility went from X to Y”)

The best fits right now:

My shortlist for a local SEO agency with 20–100 clients

1. Best overall agency workflow: AgencyScope

Good fit if your monthly deliverable is:

“Here’s how your business appears in ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini compared with competitors, and what we’re doing next.”

It appears purpose-built for recurring client reports rather than one-off audits. AgencyScope

2. Best if you already sell local SEO: GeoAuditKit or GEO Catalyst

If clients already receive Google Business Profile, rankings, citations, reviews, and technical SEO reporting, these are closer to a “local SEO + AI visibility” package. GeoAuditKit GEO Catalyst

3. Best lightweight add-on: Scope

If you already use a reporting stack and just need an AI visibility section, Scope may fit. Scope

A reporting stack I’d consider

For a typical local SEO agency:

• Core SEO/local reporting: BrightLocal, AgencyAnalytics, Looker Studio, Semrush, etc.
• AI visibility layer: AgencyScope / GEO Catalyst / Tower GEO
• Client delivery: branded PDF + dashboard + monthly “AI opportunities” section

A strong monthly AI visibility dashboard usually includes:

1. AI Visibility Score
2. Mention rate by engine:

• ChatGPT
• Gemini
• Perplexity
• Claude (if tracked)
• Top customer prompts:

• “best plumber in [city]”
• “emergency HVAC near me”
• “top dentists for implants in [city]”
• Competitor share of voice
• Citations/sources influencing AI answers
• Recommended actions:

• review growth
• local content
• directory improvements
• schema/entity work
• PR/link opportunities

For a dozens-of-clients agency model, I’d lean toward AgencyScope, GeoAuditKit, GEO Catalyst, or Tower GEO depending on whether your priority is reporting polish or local SEO execution. AgencyScope GeoAuditKit GEO Catalyst Tower GEO

If you tell me your client count (e.g., 25 vs 200), current stack (BrightLocal/AgencyAnalytics/Looker/etc.), and whether you need white-label client portals, I can narrow it to 2–3 options.

If clients already receive Google Business Profile, rankings, citations, reviews, and technical SEO reporting, these are closer to a “local SEO + AI visibility” package.

3. Best lightweight add-on: Scope

If you're managing dozens of local-business clients and want a repeatable monthly AI visibility report, I’d prioritize tools that handle multi-client tracking, local/competitor prompts, white-label reporting, and automation—not just raw AI rankings.

My shortlist

1. AgencyAnalytics — probably the safest choice

agencyanalytics.com

This is particularly attractive if you're already producing monthly SEO reports. Its AI Tracker puts AI visibility alongside the client's SEO, PPC, social, traffic and other marketing data rather than creating another standalone reporting system. It currently tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini. AgencyAnalytics

I'd choose this if: your goal is one monthly client report covering traditional SEO + AI visibility.

2. Local Dominator — worth a serious look for local SEO

localdominator.co

Its AI tracker is specifically positioned around agencies and local brands, monitoring visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Claude, Grok and other AI experiences. Local Dominator

I'd choose this if: your clients are dentists, HVAC companies, lawyers, med spas, restaurants, home services, etc., and you care about local-market visibility rather than generic brand visibility.

3. Tower GEO — purpose-built agency workflow

towergeo.com

Tower GEO explicitly supports multiple client brands, competitor tracking, AI mentions, citations, sentiment, white-label PDFs and client-facing dashboards. Its current agency positioning is specifically for managing dozens of brands. Tower GEO

I'd choose this if: you're planning to sell AI visibility/GEO as a separate recurring service rather than merely adding one section to an SEO report.

4. AgencyScope — simplest monthly-report workflow

agencyscope.ai

AgencyScope is unusually focused on the actual reporting deliverable: recurring prompt checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, competitor comparisons, prompt-level evidence and white-label PDF reports. AgencyScope AgencyScope

This could be attractive if your workflow is essentially:

run prompts → generate report → account manager reviews → send to client.

5. Surva.ai — strongest if clients need their own portal

surva.ai

Surva offers branded client portals, custom domains, agency branding, branded PDFs and digest emails, with multi-client management. Surva.ai

That's more appropriate if you're trying to make AI visibility look like a proprietary agency product rather than simply sending another PDF.

What I'd do for dozens of local clients

I'd narrow it to three:

Already using an SEO reporting platform → AgencyAnalytics

Primarily a local SEO agency → Local Dominator

Building a dedicated GEO/AEO monthly service → Tower GEO or Surva

One important consideration: don't build your dashboard around a single "AI visibility score." Recent research on local AI recommendations found substantial disagreement among ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity—only 4.6% of recommended businesses in the study were named by all four platforms. Visibility Index

For local clients, I'd want the monthly report to show:

• AI mention rate for the client's target prompts
• Position/rank when mentioned
• Share of voice vs. 3–5 local competitors
• ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Claude separately
• Which prompts produce recommendations
• Which sources AI is citing
• Google Business Profile / website / directories appearing as sources
• New citation opportunities
• Month-over-month movement
• A short "what we should do next" section

That gives you something much more commercially useful than telling a dentist, roofer, or lawyer that their "GEO score went from 61 to 68."

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 20, 50, 100+) and what you're currently using for SEO reporting, I can narrow this down to the most economical stack and estimate the monthly software cost.

This is particularly attractive if you're already producing monthly SEO reports. Its AI Tracker puts AI visibility alongside the client's SEO, PPC, social, traffic and other marketing data rather than creating another standalone reporting system. It currently tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini. AgencyAnalytics

I'd choose this if: your goal is one monthly client report covering traditional SEO + AI visibility.

2. Local Dominator — worth a serious look for local SEO

localdominator.co

Its AI tracker is specifically positioned around agencies and local brands, monitoring visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Claude, Grok and other AI experiences. Local Dominator

I'd choose this if: your clients are dentists, HVAC companies, lawyers, med spas, restaurants, home services, etc., and you care about local-market visibility rather than generic brand visibility.

3. Tower GEO — purpose-built agency workflow

towergeo.com

Tower GEO explicitly supports multiple client brands, competitor tracking, AI mentions, citations, sentiment, white-label PDFs and client-facing dashboards. Its current agency positioning is specifically for managing dozens of brands. Tower GEO

I'd choose this if: you're planning to sell AI visibility/GEO as a separate recurring service rather than merely adding one section to an SEO report.

4. AgencyScope — simplest monthly-report workflow

agencyscope.ai

AgencyScope is unusually focused on the actual reporting deliverable: recurring prompt checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, competitor comparisons, prompt-level evidence and white-label PDF reports. AgencyScope AgencyScope

This could be attractive if your workflow is essentially:

run prompts → generate report → account manager reviews → send to client.

5. Surva.ai — strongest if clients need their own portal

surva.ai

Surva offers branded client portals, custom domains, agency branding, branded PDFs and digest emails, with multi-client management. Surva.ai

That's more appropriate if you're trying to make AI visibility look like a proprietary agency product rather than simply sending another PDF.

What I'd do for dozens of local clients

I'd narrow it to three:

Already using an SEO reporting platform → AgencyAnalytics

Primarily a local SEO agency → Local Dominator

Building a dedicated GEO/AEO monthly service → Tower GEO or Surva

One important consideration: don't build your dashboard around a single "AI visibility score." Recent research on local AI recommendations found substantial disagreement among ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity—only 4.6% of recommended businesses in the study were named by all four platforms.

For local clients, I'd want the monthly report to show:

Yes. The category you’re describing exists, but the exact combination — tracking client-specific AI answer snippets + generating polished client-facing summaries — is usually handled by a few adjacent tool categories rather than one dominant platform.

What you likely want is an AI visibility / answer monitoring + reporting platform if you mean “what AI assistants are saying about my client,” or a conversation intelligence / knowledge management platform if you mean “capture AI-generated answers and turn them into client reports.”

If you mean tracking what AI says about each client (AI search visibility)

These platforms monitor prompts, AI responses, citations, mentions, and recommendations:

• Briefly — Tracks AI answers for client-specific questions, shows which organizations appear in responses, and can generate client-ready reports with exports and white-label reporting features. Briefly
• Emerging “AI visibility” tools generally track:

• target prompts/questions
• AI model responses
• whether a brand/client is mentioned
• competitor mentions
• citations/sources
• changes over time

Typical client report:

“This month, your brand appeared in 42% of tracked AI answers for 100 questions. Visibility increased from last month. These sources influenced responses…”

If you mean tracking AI-generated snippets from client conversations and producing summaries

These are closer:

• Dovetail — Uses AI to analyze customer data and generate insights while tracing answers back to source material. Dovetail
• Jurnie — Builds client histories from conversations, tracks commitments/decisions, and lets teams query client context. Jurnie
• Attention — Extracts answers and insights from sales/customer calls with links back to relevant snippets. Attention

If you’re building this for an agency or consultancy

The ideal workflow is probably:

1. Client workspace

• Client A
• Client B
• Client C
• Tracked questions

• “Who are the best providers for X?”
• “What solutions exist for Y?”
• “Compare company A vs company B”
• AI response capture

• ChatGPT
• Claude
• Gemini
• Perplexity
• AI search results
• Snippet extraction

• mention detected
• sentiment/context
• cited sources
• competitor mentions
• Auto-generated client report

• executive summary
• screenshots/snippets
• changes since last report
• recommended actions

For an agency use case, I’d look hardest at AI visibility platforms (like Briefly) rather than meeting-summary tools. For an internal client-success workflow, a knowledge platform like Dovetail/Jurnie-style systems may fit better. Briefly Dovetail Jurnie

A useful clarification: are you trying to track (A) what ChatGPT/Claude/etc. answer about your clients, or (B) answers your own AI system gives to clients and summarize those interactions? The best platforms are different.

Yes. There are now platforms specifically built to track what AI assistants answer about a client/brand, save the answer snippets, and turn them into client-facing reports. This category is often called AI visibility tracking, AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) monitoring, or GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) reporting. Jepto Latentline

A few options depending on your workflow:

Typical workflow looks like:

1. Create a client profile

• Brand name
• Website
• Competitors
• Target markets
• Key customer questions
• Define tracked prompts

• “Best accounting software for small businesses”
• “Top marketing agencies in [city]”
• “Alternatives to [competitor]”
• Run scheduled AI checks

• ChatGPT
• Gemini
• Perplexity
• Claude
• Google AI surfaces (where supported)
• Capture evidence

• Exact AI answer text
• Whether the client appeared
• Position/mention context
• Citations/sources used
• Competitor mentions
• Generate client summaries

Example output:

“This month, your brand appeared in 18 of 50 tracked AI answers. AI systems most frequently cited your comparison pages and third-party reviews. Three competitors appeared in prompts where you were absent.”

If you mean tracking snippets from your own internal AI usage (for example, sales teams using ChatGPT and wanting a client knowledge log), that is a different category—more like conversation intelligence, CRM logging, or AI governance.

If you mean an agency product where each client gets a monthly “here’s what ChatGPT/Gemini are saying about you” report, the tools above are the closest match. AgencyScope GetMentioned

For a boutique agency doing client-facing AI-search/GEO reporting, I’d shortlist OtterlyAI and Profound. The key distinction is whether you mainly need simple multi-client reporting or deep page-level citation intelligence.

My take

1. OtterlyAI — probably the best fit for a boutique agency

otterly.ai tracks AI visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, including the specific URLs cited in AI answers. It also has workspaces for multiple clients, branded reports, CSV exports, API/MCP access, and a Looker Studio connector. Otterly Otterly Otterly

The particularly useful metric for your use case is website citation tracking: you can see which client URLs are actually being cited, how frequently, and changes in citation position over time. Otterly

I'd use it if your agency wants to produce something like:

• "These 17 client pages were cited by AI this month"
• "Page X went from 4 → 19 citations"
• "Competitors are being cited for these 12 prompts where you aren't"
• "ChatGPT cites these pages, while Google AI Overviews favors these others"
• Monthly branded PDF/dashboard for each client

2. Profound — stronger if citation/page analysis is the core service

tryprofound.com has particularly strong page-level citation analysis. Its Pages product combines citation share with page-level AI bot activity, and lets you break citations down by prompt, topic, platform, region, persona and even text chunks. Profound Help Center Profound

It also has agency-oriented client management and configurable dashboards with PDF exports and public links. Profound Profound

I'd lean Profound if you're selling a more sophisticated "AI content intelligence" service rather than simply adding an AI-visibility section to conventional SEO reports.

What I'd choose

For a boutique agency, I'd start with OtterlyAI. Its agency workflow is explicitly built around multiple client workspaces, reports, and integrations, while still giving you the URL-level citation data you're after. Otterly

One important caveat: don't report "AI citations" as though they're equivalent to Google Search Console clicks or organic rankings. A good client report should distinguish AI visibility, mentions, citations, cited URLs, and actual referral traffic. Profound, for example, can combine citation data with AI bot/referral activity when its Agent Analytics is configured. Profound Help Center

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 30, 100) and whether you already use Looker Studio, I can compare the agency pricing/workflows and tell you which setup makes the most sense.

For a boutique agency that needs to (1) identify which client pages get cited by AI assistants and (2) turn that into repeatable client reports, I’d prioritize tools that give you URL-level citations + exportable reporting, not just “AI visibility scores.” The market is still young, so the best stack depends on your client volume and budget. SEORav

Best fits for a boutique agency

1. citespy.app — best agency-friendly starting point

Best for: small agencies managing several SEO/AEO clients.

Why it fits:

• Tracks which URLs are cited by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity.
• Shows competitor citation gaps.
• Provides PDF-style reporting workflows.
• Lower-cost entry compared with enterprise platforms. CiteSpy

Good client report sections:

• AI citation share
• Queries where the client appears
• Pages being cited
• Competitor pages winning citations
• Recommended content fixes

2. tryprofound.com — best for premium retainers

Best for: agencies selling AI search strategy to larger brands.

Strengths:

• Deeper AI visibility research.
• Stronger enterprise reporting and competitive intelligence.
• Better if you want to position “AI search optimization” as a strategic service rather than an SEO add-on. Nick Lafferty

Downside:

• Usually more than a boutique agency needs unless clients have meaningful budgets.

3. indexly.ai — best if you care about page-level citation analytics

Best for: answering “which exact URLs are AI engines trusting?”

Useful metrics:

• Citation counts by URL
• Citation share
• Citation gaps
• Engine-by-engine breakdowns (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, etc.) Indexly

This maps well to an agency deliverable:

“These 12 pages generated 78% of your AI citations; these 8 competitor pages are replacing you.”

4. cite.watch — best if you want attribution + reporting

Best for: agencies trying to connect AI visibility to traffic outcomes.

It focuses on:

• AI assistant citations
• Share of voice
• AI referral attribution via tracking. Cite Watch

The reporting stack I’d use for a boutique agency

A practical setup:

Your monthly client report could include:

1. AI Visibility Score

• % of tracked prompts where client is cited
• Top AI-Cited Pages

• URL
• Number of citations
• Which assistants cited it
• Citation Winners & Losers

• Competitor URLs replacing client pages
• Content Opportunities

• Missing FAQs
• Missing comparison pages
• Missing expert content
• Schema/entity improvements
• Actions Completed

• Pages updated
• New content published
• Citation gains

My recommendation by agency size

• 1–10 clients: Start with citespy.app or indexly.ai + Looker Studio.
• 10–50 clients: Add a more robust platform like tryprofound.com.
• Enterprise clients: Build a dedicated AI visibility practice around Profound/CiteWatch-style reporting.

One caution: AI citation tracking is not yet as standardized as Google rankings. A good agency report should show the exact prompts tested, assistants tested, cited URLs, and date range so clients understand the measurement method. SEORav

For an agency workflow, I’d look for a platform that combines multi-client workspaces, scheduled AI visibility monitoring, white-label reports, and stakeholder delivery rather than a generic dashboard.

Shortlist

• gumshoe.ai — Strong fit if you want structured, repeatable reporting across a client portfolio. It supports weekly/biweekly/monthly schedules, client organizations, shareable reports, CSV/JSON exports, and an API for feeding your own reporting stack. Gumshoe AI Gumshoe AI
• seerly.app — More oriented toward branded client deliverables: white-label PDF/web reports, automated monthly scheduling, per-client competitor benchmarking, and evidence behind reported metrics. Seerly
• rankfender.com — Worth considering if you want the reporting layer to include AI-system breakdowns alongside GSC/GA4 data, with white-label reports, scheduled weekly/monthly delivery, and client portals. RankFender
• apexeo.app — Focuses specifically on agency delivery: separate client workspaces, white-label PDFs, no-login client links, and scheduled weekly/monthly emails to stakeholders. Apexeo
• agencyscope.ai — A simpler workflow if the primary deliverable is a recurring white-label PDF. It supports per-client prompts, recurring weekly/monthly checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, and client-ready reports. AgencyScope

What I’d configure

For most agency accounts, I'd set up:

Client workspace → fixed prompt/query set → weekly data collection → monthly stakeholder report → automatic email/link delivery

The important part is keeping the same prompts, competitors, and measurement methodology between reporting periods. That makes changes in visibility much more meaningful than ad-hoc screenshots of AI answers.

If you already use Looker Studio or another BI/reporting system, Gumshoe's API/export approach is particularly relevant because you can keep your existing agency reporting infrastructure rather than moving everything into another dashboard. Gumshoe AI

If your priority is "set it once and have polished, agency-branded reports automatically land in clients' inboxes," I'd focus the evaluation on Seerly, Apex, and Rankfender, checking their current pricing, AI engines, white-label limitations, and recipient/scheduling controls before committing.

If your goal is agency-grade, recurring AI visibility reporting for clients and executives, I’d shortlist these:

• gumshoe.ai — Strong fit for agencies managing multiple client accounts. It supports weekly, biweekly, and monthly scheduled runs, client organizations/permissions, shareable reports, CSV/JSON exports, and an API for feeding your existing reporting stack. Gumshoe AI Gumshoe AI
• prominenceai.io — Particularly relevant if the requirement is simply “configure once → automatically email stakeholders.” You select the project, market, LLM engines, segments, cadence, and recipients; reports are generated and emailed automatically and retained in the platform. Prominence AI
• towergeo.com — More agency/client-facing: white-label reports, branded dashboards, multi-client management, and automated monthly sends to stakeholders. Tower GEO
• seerly.app — Offers white-label PDF/web reports with per-client automated monthly scheduling, competitive benchmarking, and underlying AI-response evidence. Seerly
• usecliro.com — Useful if you want scheduled reports that combine AI visibility with metrics such as share of voice, citations, AI traffic, and Search Console data. Supports weekly/monthly/custom cadences, white labeling, PDF/CSV, and no-login sharing. Cliro

What I'd look for

For an agency workflow, I'd prioritize:

1. Per-client schedules — each stakeholder/client can have a different cadence.
2. Automatic email delivery — not merely “the report is ready in the dashboard.”
3. White labeling — agency logo, colors, domain, and ideally no vendor branding.
4. Stakeholder-friendly formats — PDF + browser link, preferably without requiring an account.
5. Fixed prompt sets and historical snapshots — essential for meaningful month-over-month comparisons.
6. Evidence behind metrics — underlying AI answers/citations so an account manager can defend the numbers.
7. Multi-client administration — separate workspaces, permissions, and schedules.
8. API/export — important if you eventually want to incorporate AI visibility into Looker Studio, PowerPoint, or your existing agency reporting system.

If I were designing the workflow rather than simply buying a dashboard, the target would be: client workspace → fixed prompt/competitor set → automated AI checks → scheduled report generation → branded PDF/link → automatic distribution to a stakeholder list → archived historical version. Gumshoe, Prominence AI, and Tower GEO all cover substantial portions of that workflow, but with different emphases. Gumshoe AI Tower GEO Prominence AI

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you need white-label PDFs, email delivery, or integration with an existing reporting platform, I can narrow this to the most suitable options and compare pricing/features.

If you mean monitoring how clients’ brands are mentioned in AI answers and exporting agency-branded PDFs, several tools fit that workflow:

• agencyscope.ai — specifically built for agencies; tracks mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini and produces white-label PDF reports with your logo, colors, and client details. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• aibrandreport.com — monitors ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Perplexity, with competitive benchmarking and white-label PDF exports. AI Brand Report
• ayzeo.com — emphasizes per-client branding and detailed PDF reports covering visibility, citations, mentions, sentiment, and competitors. Ayzeo
• aeovisor.com — agency dashboard for multiple brands, AI-engine monitoring, scheduled exports, and white-label PDFs. AEOVisor

If your two must-haves are “AI mention monitoring + client-branded PDF,” AgencyScope is the most directly aligned option based on its stated agency workflow. AgencyScope

If you tell me your number of clients and which AI engines you need (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.), I can narrow these down by features and pricing.

If you mean monitoring how clients are mentioned/recommended in AI answers and exporting agency-branded PDFs, several tools fit:

• AgencyScope — specifically built for SEO/GEO agencies; monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini and exports white-label PDF reports with agency branding. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• Tower GEO — tracks client mentions, sentiment, citations, and competitors across AI search, with white-label PDF and dashboard reporting. Tower GEO
• AI Brand Report — monitors ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Perplexity and includes white-label PDF reports for agency clients. aibrandreport.com
• Depra AI — tracks client brands across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews and lets agencies save client reports as PDFs without Depra branding. depra.ai

Closest match to your description: AgencyScope, particularly if the main requirement is recurring client monitoring + polished, agency-branded PDF deliverables. AgencyScope

If the agency’s core requirement is “track AI citations/mentions over time and turn that into client-facing executive reporting,” there are several purpose-built options worth looking at.

My shortlist

• agencyanalytics.com — probably the most natural fit if the agency already uses AgencyAnalytics. It tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, shows trends over time, benchmarks competitors, and feeds the data into existing client dashboards/reports. It also supports white-label reporting. AgencyAnalytics
• gumshoe.ai — particularly interesting if citation-source analysis is the priority. It tracks visibility, rankings, and citation sources across 11 AI models, supports scheduled runs, multi-client organizations, shareable dashboards, CSV/JSON/API exports, and agency reporting workflows. Gumshoe AI
• citations.io — explicitly designed around agency use: separate client workspaces, citation evidence, competitor tracking, confidence-labelled metrics, and branded/board-ready reports. It currently advertises tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude. Citations
• seerly.app — strong option if you want the evidence behind the executive summary. It retains historical runs, supports 7-day/30-day/3-month comparisons, shows the underlying AI response behind reported metrics, and provides scheduled branded PDF/web reports. Seerly
• zumihq.com — geared heavily toward agencies managing multiple brands, with isolated client workspaces, white-label reporting, trend charts, and citation tracking. Zumi

If I were evaluating them for an agency

I'd structure the evaluation around five things:

AgencyAnalytics is compelling if you want AI visibility integrated into an existing marketing-reporting stack. Gumshoe and Citations.io are more interesting if the agency's service is specifically AI visibility/GEO and citation intelligence. Seerly stands out if having defensible underlying evidence for every reported change is important.

One distinction I'd pay close attention to: “AI visibility tracking” isn't necessarily the same as “citation tracking.” If your executive report needs to say “Client citations from authoritative industry domains increased 27% over the last quarter, while Competitor X gained citations from these five domains,” you want a platform that preserves the actual citation/source evidence, not merely a visibility score.

If you tell me roughly how many clients the agency manages (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you need white-label PDF/email reports, I can narrow this to the 2–3 most suitable platforms and compare pricing/features.

For an agency managing multiple clients, you’ll want a platform that does four things well:

1. Tracks AI citations over time (which AI engines cite the client, which sources are used, citation rate trends)
2. Supports multiple client workspaces
3. Produces client-ready executive summaries
4. Allows white-label or scheduled reporting

Some platforms that fit that workflow:

If your agency workflow is:

• “I need monthly client PDFs with an executive narrative” → Citationly or Findable are closest fits. CITATIONLY Sofindable
• “I want to sell AI visibility as a new retainer service” → LLM Pulse, GenMention, or Mentionable are worth evaluating. LLM Pulse Genmention Mentionable
• “We need to pipe citation data into our own reporting stack (Looker Studio, dashboards, portals)” → CitationBench is more API-oriented. CitationBench

For an SEO/content agency with 10–100+ clients, I’d prioritize these evaluation criteria:

• Historical citation tracking (not just a current score)
• Prompt/topic-level tracking
• Exact cited URLs and sources
• Competitor comparisons
• White-label client portals or PDFs
• Automated monthly executive summaries
• Export/API access

The market is still developing, so it’s worth validating which AI systems are actually monitored (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.) and how often they refresh data before committing. CitationBench Genmention

If your agency needs to aggregate AI-assistant visibility across regions, manage many clients, and turn the data into client-ready reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My practical shortlist

1. Pondral — if measurement depth matters most.
It runs weekly five-engine audits, supports multiple client brands in one workspace, provides white-label reports, and exposes timestamped/raw-response provenance. It also offers API/webhooks/exports, which is useful if you want to aggregate results into your own BI or client reporting layer. pondral.com

2. Surfaced — if you want the simplest agency product.
It is explicitly designed around agency delivery: unlimited client projects, recurring checks across ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/Perplexity, and reports under your own logo/domain. Its agency plan is advertised at $149/month. heysurfaced.compondral.com

3. AgencyScope — if the deliverable is the priority.
This is particularly interesting if you're trying to add an AI-visibility section to existing monthly SEO retainers. It emphasizes prompt-level evidence, historical runs, regional/client configuration, and polished white-label PDFs rather than trying to become a full GEO execution platform. agencyscope.aipondral.com

4. GetIntel — if you want analytics to turn into action.
Beyond measuring visibility, it says it identifies gaps and drafts fixes such as entity pages, counter-content, and outreach. That could reduce the strategy team's manual work after the reporting phase. getintel.ai

One important distinction

For regional visibility, don't just look for a "location" field. I'd specifically test whether the platform can run the same prompt set independently by market, e.g.:

“best payroll software for 100-person companies”

run separately for Dallas, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, etc., while preserving the assistant, language, prompt, date, competitor set, and underlying answer.

That's much more useful than a single global visibility score because AI answers can vary substantially by market and search context.

For an agency dashboard, I'd want these core dimensions:

Client → Region → Assistant → Prompt → Visibility → Position/mention → Competitors → Citations → Trend → Evidence

Pondral and General Data Works look particularly relevant if that regional + multi-assistant aggregation is the core requirement; AgencyScope/Surfaced look more oriented toward getting polished agency reports out quickly. pondral.com

If you tell me roughly how many clients/regions you need to monitor (e.g. 50 clients × 20 cities × 5 assistants), I can narrow this down to the tools whose architecture and pricing are most appropriate.

If your core requirement is “one place to aggregate AI-assistant visibility across clients/regions and turn it into polished client reporting,” I’d shortlist these:

• AgencyAnalytics — best fit if you already run agency reporting there. Its AI Tracker puts AI visibility alongside SEO, PPC, social, GA, Search Console, etc., and supports client-ready/white-label reporting. It currently tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. AgencyAnalytics
• Zumi — strongest agency-native option for multi-client GEO. It offers separate client workspaces, white-label reports, competitor tracking, and coverage of up to nine AI engines. Zumi
• Promptwatch — worth considering for a more analytics-heavy agency setup. It supports multi-client management, white-label dashboards, API/MCP access, Data Studio, and client portals. Promptwatch
• RISN AI — interesting if you want broad engine coverage. It advertises 8+ AI engines, unlimited brands, competitive benchmarking, and client-level reporting. RISN AI
• AgencyScope — particularly interesting if the deliverable is the report itself. It focuses on recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini and produces white-label PDFs with prompt-level evidence. AgencyScope AgencyScope

For your specific use case

I'd distinguish “AI visibility tracker” from “agency analytics/reporting layer.”

If you need regional aggregation, I'd make this a hard evaluation criterion rather than assuming that a platform's “multi-client” capability means geographic segmentation. You want to be able to structure something like:

Client → country → city/market → language → prompt set → AI assistant → visibility/share of voice → competitors → citations → trend

That's important because AI answers can vary substantially by platform and market. A 2026 study covering 12 U.S. cities found only 4.6% of recommended businesses were named by all four major assistants, illustrating why a single aggregate “AI visibility score” can hide meaningful regional differences. Visibility Index

My practical shortlist would therefore be:

1. AgencyAnalytics if the agency already has a broad client-reporting stack and wants AI visibility integrated into it.
2. Zumi if AI/GEO visibility itself is becoming a major agency service and you need multi-client + multi-engine + white-label workflows.
3. Promptwatch if API/data integration and deeper analytics matter more than simply producing PDFs.
4. AgencyScope if your primary pain is turning repeatable AI checks into credible monthly client deliverables.

If you tell me roughly how many clients/regions you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 10 countries), I can narrow this to the 2–3 platforms that fit that scale and compare pricing, regional tracking, engines, API, white-labeling, and reporting.

Yes. What you’re describing is generally called AI visibility / AEO / GEO prompt tracking: you give a tool a set of keywords or natural-language questions, it runs them against AI assistants, and reports which prompts trigger a client’s brand, which competitors appear, and which sources get cited.

A few tools I found that are particularly close:

• agencyscope.ai — very agency-oriented. Tracks prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini and turns the results into white-label client reports. It keeps the actual prompt/answer evidence, which is useful for explaining why a client did or didn't appear. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• indaeo.com — particularly close to your wording. Its prompt-tracking feature identifies which prompts trigger brand mentions, which sources AI trusts, and where competitors appear instead. Indaeo
• rankpad.app — built around agency reporting, including prompts, brand mentions, competitor shortlists, citations, answer accuracy, and month-over-month movement. RankPad
• promptwatch.com — more of a broader AI-search visibility platform, with multi-client management, white-label dashboards, reporting, citations, and AI visibility metrics. Promptwatch
• audit.filter.agency — explicitly has keyword-level visibility, showing which keywords trigger brand mentions and providing the underlying AI answer excerpts. Brand Auditor

The distinction I'd make

If by "which keywords trigger client answers" you mean:

"For Client X, show me the 50 questions/keywords where ChatGPT mentions them, the 30 where competitors appear instead, and the actual answers so I can put this in a monthly report."

Then Indaeo, AgencyScope, and Filter Agency look especially aligned.

If you mean something more sophisticated—discover the prompts/keywords automatically, rather than manually supplying a keyword list—that's a slightly different product capability. Some platforms are beginning to estimate/search for high-intent prompts, but many still fundamentally rely on an agency-defined prompt set. Brand Auditor AgencyScope

There is also a potentially interesting product gap here: a tool that takes a client's existing SEO keyword list/Search Console queries, converts them into realistic AI-assistant questions, tests those questions across models, and produces a "keyword → AI answer → client mentioned? → competitor mentioned? → citation → recommended action" report. That's more specific than conventional AI visibility tracking.

Yes. The category is usually called AI visibility tracking, GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) tracking, AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) monitoring, or AI search analytics. These tools are designed for agencies to answer questions like:

• “Which client queries cause ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity to mention us?”
• “Which prompts cause competitors to appear instead?”
• “What sources are AI assistants citing?”
• “How is our visibility changing month over month for client reporting?”

Some tools that fit this use case:

The workflow these platforms generally use is:

1. Create a prompt set

Example:

• “best CRM for small businesses”
• “top accounting firms in Chicago”
• “alternatives to [competitor]”
• “who offers enterprise cybersecurity consulting?”
• Run those prompts repeatedly through AI assistants.
• Capture the response data:

• Was the client mentioned?
• Where did they appear in the answer?
• Which competitors appeared?
• Which URLs/sources were cited?
• What language did the AI use?
• Turn it into client reporting:

• AI visibility score
• share of voice
• citation growth
• lost opportunities
• recommended content/PR actions

A key distinction: these are less like traditional SEO keyword trackers (Ahrefs, Semrush rank tracking) and more like “rank tracking for AI answers.” They usually track prompts/questions rather than individual keywords because AI assistants generate answers from broader context.

For an agency, I’d evaluate tools based on:

• white-label PDF/dashboard reports
• number of tracked prompts per client
• competitor tracking
• citation/source analysis
• API/export options
• whether they support ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and AI Overviews

If you mean mapping the exact words inside a client’s knowledge base/content that cause an AI assistant to answer a certain way (rather than tracking public AI search visibility), that is a slightly different category: AI observability / LLM analytics tools.

For an agency managing multiple client accounts, I’d prioritize multi-client workspaces, client data isolation, team roles/permissions, scheduled reporting, and white-label exports. A few platforms that fit that workflow:

My shortlist by agency type

• Small/mid-size SEO or marketing agency adding AI visibility as a service: Indexly or Scout LLM. They emphasize agency workspaces and permissions. Indexly Scout LLM
• White-label client deliverables are a priority: Outercite or Zumi. Outercite Zumi
• Large client roster with many internal users: Gumshoe or Indexly, depending on whether you need deeper analysis workflows or broader GEO execution features. Gumshoe AI Indexly

Before choosing, I’d verify these specific items in a demo:

1. Can account managers see only assigned clients?
2. Can clients get viewer-only access?
3. Are reports exportable with your branding?
4. Can you roll up visibility metrics across all clients?
5. Is pricing based on seats, tracked prompts, or client workspaces?

If you tell me your approximate client count (e.g., 5, 50, 500) and whether you need white-label PDFs/client portals, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options.

For an agency team managing multiple clients, I’d shortlist platforms that have client workspaces, team permissions/roles, and client-ready AI visibility reports rather than tools designed for a single brand.

Recommended platforms

1. Indexly — strong fit for agency operations

indexly.ai

Why it fits:

• Multi-client workspaces with isolated client data
• Team seats and role-based access
• Client-ready reporting
• Tracks AI visibility across engines such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI surfaces
• Designed around agency workflows (audit → tracking → reporting) Indexly

Best for: SEO/GEO agencies that want each client treated as a separate account with controlled access.

2. Outercite — best if white-label reporting matters

outercite.com

Why it fits:

• One agency dashboard managing multiple client workspaces
• Client isolation
• Role-based team access
• White-label reports with agency branding Outercite

Best for: Agencies selling AI visibility as a packaged service and wanting reports that look like their own deliverables.

3. Scout LLM — good for structured team permissions

scoutllm.ai

Why it fits:

• Client workspaces
• Team seats
• Roles such as owner/admin/member/viewer
• White-label reports
• Separate prompts, regions, and client data Scout LLM

Best for: Agencies with account managers, strategists, and clients who need different permission levels.

4. Gumshoe — good for larger client portfolios

gumshoe.ai

Why it fits:

• Multi-workspace client management
• Team collaboration and role-based access
• Scheduled reporting
• API access for custom dashboards Gumshoe AI

Best for: Larger agencies building repeatable reporting processes.

5. Scope — simpler agency reporting workflow

scope.online

Why it fits:

• Multi-client dashboard
• Separate visibility tracking per business/client
• Team access
• Client-ready reports Scope

Best for: Smaller agencies that need straightforward reporting without heavy enterprise workflow requirements.

Quick comparison

If your priority is agency team governance (account managers vs strategists vs clients), I’d start with Indexly or Scout LLM. If your priority is selling the reports under your own brand, I’d look first at Outercite. Indexly Outercite Scout LLM

If you mean AI-search visibility / GEO reporting—showing clients how often they appear in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc.—there are now several agency-focused options.

My shortlist

What I'd look at first

If your primary product is a monthly client report: Ayzeo or Cliro. Ayzeo specifically supports per-project branding and produces branded reports covering visibility, citations, competitors, sentiment, trends, and multiple AI engines. Ayzeo Cliro

If you want to build AI visibility into your agency's actual service offering: Searchable is particularly interesting because it combines prospect/pitch workspaces, client workspaces, white-label reports, narratives/next actions, and API access. Searchable

If you want the client to feel like they're logging into your software rather than receiving a PDF from a third party: look at Zumi, ReachLLM, GeoBubbles, or Tower GEO. These go beyond simply putting your logo on a PDF. Zumi ReachLLM geobubbles.com towergeo.com

One important distinction: "white-label reporting" can mean either a branded PDF or a genuinely white-labeled client portal/dashboard. Those are very different products, and vendors sometimes use the term for both. seoforgpt.io

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to report on (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you need a client login/dashboard or just automated branded PDFs, I can narrow this to the 2–3 most suitable options and compare pricing, AI engines, custom domains, API access, scheduled reports, and per-client economics.

Yes — the category you’re looking for is AI visibility / GEO monitoring. These tools repeatedly query AI assistants and measure whether a client is mentioned, recommended, cited, and how often competitors appear.

For an agency managing multiple clients and producing client summaries, I’d look at:

• agencyanalytics.com — particularly useful if you already use AgencyAnalytics. It tracks client visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode, and puts the AI metrics alongside SEO/PPC/social reporting. It also supports client-ready reports. AgencyAnalytics
• getmentioned.co — designed specifically around multi-client agency management. It tracks mentions/recommendations across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, with competitive comparisons and automated/white-label reporting. GetMentioned
• towergeo.com — agency-focused, with client workspaces, visibility/sentiment/citation tracking, competitive benchmarking and white-label reports. It covers ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini. Tower GEO
• agencyscope.ai — more narrowly focused on recurring AI visibility checks + white-label client PDF reports. It currently monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini and preserves prompt-level evidence for client meetings. AgencyScope
• openlens.com — broader assistant coverage: it says it queries seven AI platforms and reports mention frequency, associated attributes, competitors and cited sources. OpenLens

What I'd look for

If your agency's goal is essentially:

“Every week, tell me how often each client was mentioned by AI assistants, what assistants said about them, who they recommended instead, and give me a client-ready summary.”

then the important capabilities are:

• Multi-client workspaces
• Recurring prompts rather than one-off checks
• Mention rate / share of voice over time
• ChatGPT + Gemini + Claude + Perplexity at minimum
• Competitor tracking
• Citation/source tracking
• Exact answer/prompt evidence
• Automated weekly/monthly summaries
• White-label reports
• API/webhooks if you want to pipe results into your own reporting system

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure responses to a defined set of prompts, not every conversation happening inside an AI assistant. So “mentioned 38% of the time” normally means something like the client appeared in 38% of repeated monitored queries, rather than literally counting every ChatGPT/Gemini conversation on the internet. demandlocal.com searchprism.io

If you're building this as an agency service, AgencyAnalytics, GetMentioned, and Tower GEO are probably the three I'd investigate first, with AgencyScope worth considering if the primary deliverable is a polished recurring client report.

If you mean “track how often each client’s brand gets mentioned/recommended/cited across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc., then automatically turn that into client-facing reports,” there are several tools built specifically for agencies.

Strong options

• agencyanalytics.com — Probably the most natural fit if your agency already uses AgencyAnalytics. It tracks client visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, and puts the data alongside SEO/PPC/social reporting. It can automatically populate client reports. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics
• getmentioned.co — Designed around multi-client AI visibility: mention frequency, competitive visibility, prompt-level results, source attribution, and white-label reporting. It currently emphasizes ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. GetMentioned
• agencyscope.ai — More focused on the reporting workflow: recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini followed by white-label PDF reports with prompt evidence and answer excerpts. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• towergeo.com — Agency-oriented monitoring with client workspaces, competitive benchmarking, sentiment/citation tracking, and white-label dashboards/reports; it covers ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. Tower GEO
• llmpulse.ai — Geared toward SEO agencies, with visibility scores, mention/share-of-voice tracking, citation/source analysis, and white-label reporting. LLM Pulse

What I'd look for

For an agency, the key isn't simply “AI mentions.” You want a system that can:

1. Create a prompt set per client — e.g. 50 questions prospects might ask an AI assistant.
2. Run those prompts repeatedly across multiple assistants.
3. Measure mention rate/share of voice — e.g. “Client A appeared in 38% of relevant answers.”
4. Track competitors in the same answers.
5. Save the actual AI responses and citations, so the client can see the evidence.
6. Show trends over time, rather than relying on one-off checks.
7. Automatically generate white-label client summaries/reports.

For your specific description, AgencyAnalytics is particularly interesting if you want AI visibility to become another section of your existing client reporting, while AgencyScope/GetMentioned look more purpose-built if the primary product you're selling is AI visibility monitoring and reporting. AgencyAnalytics GetMentioned AgencyScope

If you tell me how many clients you manage and whether you want automated weekly/monthly reports, I can narrow this down to 2–3 tools and compare their pricing, AI platforms, white-label capabilities, and API/integration options.

For an agency workflow, I’d shortlist these:

• agencyscope.ai — best fit for before/after client reporting. It tracks AI visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, stores prompt evidence, compares runs over time, and creates white-label PDF reports. AgencyScope
• traqer.ai — strong for agencies managing many brands; it tracks topic-level AI visibility, keeps history, and supports client reporting workflows. Traqer
• citenzo.com — good if you want reports focused on AI visibility score, share of voice, and measurable lift after content changes. Citenzo
• agencyanalytics.com — useful if your agency already uses AgencyAnalytics and wants AI visibility alongside SEO/PPC/client dashboards. AgencyAnalytics

For your exact use case—“we updated content, did AI mentions improve, and can we prove it to the client?”—I’d start with AgencyScope or Citenzo because their reporting model maps closest to a content-retainer deliverable. AgencyScope Citenzo

I’d look at citenzo.com first for your use case. It specifically supports agencies with:

• Before/after measurement of AI visibility following content changes.
• Client-level projects with historical tracking.
• White-label reports with visibility score, share of voice, and lift.
• Coverage across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, and Google AI.
• Competitor comparisons, so you can show why visibility changed. Citenzo

If your priority is broader agency reporting rather than explicitly attributing content changes, AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker is another strong fit because AI visibility sits alongside SEO/PPC/social reporting and can flow into automated client dashboards. AgencyAnalytics

For a more evidence-heavy workflow, jujuGEO explicitly tracks the citation before/after publishing a content fix. jujugeo.com

If your priority is piping AI-visibility data into a client CRM, BI stack, or automated reporting workflow, I’d shortlist these:

• otterly.ai — particularly strong for agency/client reporting. Its API can feed visibility, mentions, citations, prompts, and share-of-voice data into custom dashboards, data warehouses, and tools such as Looker Studio, Tableau, and Power BI. It also has a Looker Studio connector for automated client reports. Otterly AI Otterly AI
• gumshoe.ai — good if you want a straightforward agency workflow. It offers CSV, JSON, and read-only API access, with the API intended for custom reporting pipelines and integrations with Looker/Data Studio or internal dashboards. Gumshoe AI
• sellm.io — worth considering if API-first integration is the main requirement. Its REST API exposes the platform's AI-search tracking data for dashboards, reporting pipelines, alerting, and internal tooling. Sellm
• keyword.com — attractive if you want an existing reporting ecosystem: it supports CSV/Google Sheets exports, a Looker Studio connector, and an API, and can combine AI visibility reporting with other marketing data. Keyword Support Hub
• ceyo.ai — especially agency-oriented, with scheduled CSV/JSON exports, an agency API, white-label reporting, and client portals. Ceyo

My practical recommendation

For an agency where AI visibility → CRM/data layer → automated client report is the desired architecture, I'd investigate OtterlyAI first. The combination of API + BI connector + client reporting is directly aligned with that workflow. Otterly AI Otterly AI

If by “client CRM” you specifically mean something like HubSpot or Salesforce, rather than just a data warehouse/BI tool, tell me which CRM and reporting suite you're using. I can compare platforms specifically on native integration vs API/webhook vs Zapier/Make, including pricing and whether client-level data can be isolated automatically.

If your priority is getting AI visibility data out of the platform and into CRM/BI reporting, I’d shortlist these:

• AEO Platform — probably the closest match to your requirement. It explicitly supports HubSpot and Salesforce, plus Looker Studio, Zapier, Make, REST API, and CSV export. That makes it well suited to pushing visibility metrics into an existing client reporting workflow rather than maintaining another standalone dashboard. AEO Platform
• DemandSphere — stronger fit for larger teams with a data/BI stack. It offers REST APIs, webhooks, CSV/JSON, and direct connections to BigQuery, Snowflake, Looker Studio, Tableau, and Power BI. DemandSphere
• Gumshoe — a good agency-oriented option if you want recurring client reports plus programmatic access. It provides CSV, JSON, API, scheduled reporting, and shareable client reports. Gumshoe AI
• Searchable — worth considering for enterprise reporting. It provides a REST API and Looker Studio templates specifically for piping AI-search scores, citations, and gaps into downstream systems. Searchable
• AI Peekaboo — interesting if you want a relatively straightforward API-first approach; its REST API exposes prompts, scores, sources, and snapshots for reporting workflows. Peekaboo

My practical recommendation

If you're an agency reporting AI visibility alongside SEO/marketing performance, I'd start with AEO Platform because the combination of native CRM integrations + Looker Studio + API + automation connectors is closest to “set it up once and have the data flow into the existing reporting stack.” AEO Platform

If you tell me your actual stack — e.g. HubSpot + Looker Studio, Salesforce + Power BI, HubSpot + Databox, etc. — I can narrow this down to the platforms that support the cleanest end-to-end integration.