Answers that do not mention Peec AI

Yes. The category you’re looking for is usually called AI search visibility, AI visibility, or GEO (generative engine optimization) monitoring.

For a marketing agency specifically, I’d shortlist these:

• agencyscope.ai — probably the closest match if the priority is client-ready, white-label reporting. It checks ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, captures prompt-level evidence, competitor visibility, and produces white-label PDFs. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• agencyanalytics.com — best if the agency already uses AgencyAnalytics. AI visibility sits alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic, and revenue reporting. It covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. AgencyAnalytics
• siftly.ai — geared toward agencies managing multiple brands, with visibility tracking, competitor benchmarking, GEO experiments, and white-label reports. Siftly
• towergeo.com — agency-focused monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, with sentiment, competitive positioning, and white-label PDF/dashboard reporting. Tower GEO
• geneo.app — particularly interesting if you want a white-label client portal, rather than just PDFs. Clients can see the agency's branding and dashboards. Geneo
• adventyx.ai — broader model coverage, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Grok, with multi-client dashboards and PDF/interactive reporting. Adventyx

My pick

If the agency's goal is essentially:

“Every month, automatically show our client how often their brand appears in ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini, which competitors beat them, what questions they win/lose, and give us a polished report with our logo.”

I'd start with AgencyScope. Its positioning is unusually close to that exact workflow, including prompt-level evidence and white-label PDFs. AgencyScope

If the agency wants to make AI visibility part of its existing SEO/PPC client reporting, I'd look harder at AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker. AgencyAnalytics

One important distinction: don't just look for a tool that gives an abstract “AI visibility score.” For client reporting, I'd prioritize tools that preserve the actual prompts and AI answers/evidence behind the metric. AI responses can vary substantially between platforms and over time; recent reporting has highlighted how quickly citation patterns can change. axios.com

If you tell me how many clients the agency has and whether you want PDFs, a white-label dashboard, or both, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare pricing/features.

Yes. For a marketing agency producing client-ready reports on AI visibility, I’d shortlist these:

1. otterly.ai — best fit for most agencies

This is probably the one I’d start with. It is explicitly built for agencies and multi-client reporting. It tracks how brands appear across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Claude, including mentions, citations, position, sentiment, competitors, and share of voice. Otterly Otterly

Particularly useful for an agency:

• Separate workspaces for clients
• Automated brand reports
• Competitor/share-of-voice tracking
• Prompt-level monitoring
• Citation tracking
• CSV/PDF reporting
• Looker Studio connector for custom agency dashboards
• Daily monitoring across AI engines Otterly Otterly

2. tryprofound.com — best for sophisticated enterprise/AEO reporting

Profound is a stronger option if your agency wants to sell a more strategic Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) service. Its reporting covers visibility, citations, sentiment, share of voice, positioning, and how AI represents a brand. It also has centralized client management specifically for agencies. Profound Profound Knowledge Base

It covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Copilot, DeepSeek and Google AI Overviews. Profound

3. agencyscope.ai — interesting if the priority is white-label PDFs

AgencyScope is particularly focused on the exact deliverable you're describing: recurring AI-visibility checks turned into white-label PDF reports for clients. It currently monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini and provides prompt-level evidence in its reports. AgencyScope

My recommendation

For a typical SEO/content/PR agency, I'd trial OtterlyAI first. Its combination of multi-client workspaces, automated reports, competitor analysis and Looker Studio integration makes it especially suitable for turning AI visibility into a recurring client-reporting service. Otterly Otterly

One important distinction: these tools measure how AI assistants answer your tracked prompts, rather than simply measuring whether an AI crawler visited your website. That means you can report things like “ChatGPT mentioned our client in 68% of relevant prompts, versus 41% for the leading competitor” rather than just reporting bot traffic. Otterly Profound

If you tell me roughly how many clients the agency manages and whether you want white-label PDF reports, dashboards, or both, I can narrow this down to the best 1–2 options and compare pricing/features.

Yes. There’s now a fairly mature category around AI search visibility / GEO / AEO monitoring, and several tools are explicitly built for agencies and white-label client reporting.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — Probably one of the closest matches to what you described. It supports multiple clients, tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity, and offers custom domains, client portals, agency branding and white-label reporting. Geneo
• agencyscope.ai — More focused specifically on recurring agency reports. It runs prompts against ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini and turns the results—including prompt-level citation evidence—into branded PDFs. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• dabarank.com — Interesting if you want broader engine coverage. It claims tracking across 8 AI platforms, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok and Google AI Overviews, with daily citation tracking and white-label PDFs. DabaRank
• geocontextai.com — More of an end-to-end GEO platform. It monitors citations across eight engines, tracks competitors, and has agency/enterprise plans with scheduled branded reports. GeoContextAI
• reachd.ai — Agency-oriented, with per-client workspaces, white-label reports and monitoring across ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity, Claude and Grok. It also tries to connect monitoring to recommendations/content production. Reachd
• aicitationmonitor.com — Particularly relevant if by "citations" you mean the actual URLs/sources AI engines cite, rather than simply whether a brand was mentioned. Its agency tier includes client workspaces, branded PDFs and an API. AI Citation Monitor

If I were evaluating them for an agency

I'd separate the market into three buckets:

One important distinction: "AI visibility" and "AI citation monitoring" aren't quite the same thing. Some platforms give you a visibility score ("you're mentioned in 62% of answers"), while others let you inspect the actual cited URLs, competitors, prompts and answer evidence. For an agency, I'd strongly favor the latter because it's much easier to defend the report in a client meeting.

Also, this space is moving quickly: recent reporting shows that even the sources AI systems cite can change substantially over short periods, so monitoring needs to be longitudinal rather than a one-off audit. Axios

If you're considering building something like this yourself, rather than looking for a tool to buy, that's an especially interesting question—the current products leave some pretty obvious gaps around citation-level data, agency workflows, automated insights, and white-label reporting.

Yes. This category is now pretty well developed, and agency-focused white-label AI visibility/GEO platforms are probably what you want.

A few worth evaluating:

For what you described, I'd narrow it to Scout LLM, MentionScope, AI Brand Report, and Outercite.

What I'd look for beyond "AI visibility"

The important distinction is whether the tool merely tells you:

"Your client was mentioned by ChatGPT 37% of the time."

versus giving you the actual citation intelligence:

• Which URLs/domains did the AI cite?
• Which competitors were cited instead?
• Which prompts triggered the citation?
• Which sources consistently influence the answer?
• Has a citation appeared/disappeared over time?
• Which pages should the agency create/improve to influence those citations?
• Can you track the same prompt set repeatedly?
• Can you demonstrate movement month-over-month?
• Can the client see a white-label dashboard/report under your agency's brand?

That's where the products differ substantially.

For example, AI Brand Report explicitly offers citation-source tracking, competitor gaps, client projects, guest access, and white-label PDFs. aibrandreport.com Scout LLM goes further into the optimization workflow, including tracking when a citation is recovered. scoutllm.ai MentionScope is particularly positioned around recurring agency retainers and automated branded reporting. mentionscope.io

One interesting angle: if you're considering building or offering this as an agency service, I wouldn't necessarily compete on "AI citation tracking" alone. The more valuable product is arguably "AI visibility reporting + citation diagnosis + prioritized actions + client-ready reporting." The raw monitoring is increasingly commoditized.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to monitor (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want just reports or a full client portal, I can compare the best 3–5 options on pricing, APIs, white-label depth, citation data, automation, and margins for an agency.

For a small digital agency, I’d start with OtterlyAI.

otterly.ai

Why I’d pick it

• Client-friendly reporting: OtterlyAI can turn AI-search tracking into branded, scheduled reports exported as PDF or CSV, which is much closer to “drop this into a client deck” than raw crawler logs. Otterly
• Actual AI crawler data: Its Agent Analytics analyzes your server logs and shows which AI agents/crawlers are visiting the site, which pages they reach, and how activity changes over time. Otterly AI Otterly AI
• Useful story for clients: You can distinguish on-demand AI fetchers such as ChatGPT-User and Claude-User from search-index crawlers and training/data crawlers. That's a compelling distinction for an agency report. Otterly AI
• Good presentation metrics: Total AI-agent visits, pages visited, top AI engine, visits over time, top pages, and crawler categories are already surfaced as dashboard KPIs. Otterly AI
• Agency workflow: It also has a Looker Studio connector, so if you want to build a reusable agency-wide PowerPoint/reporting template, you can blend its data with SEO, paid, and analytics data. Otterly

One caveat

If by “AI crawler analytics” you mean specifically “how often AI bots crawl my client's website”, OtterlyAI is the better fit.

If you mean the broader client story — “How visible is my client in ChatGPT/Perplexity/Google AI, what gets cited, and how does that compare with competitors?” — I'd also evaluate Botify. Its AI Visibility product combines AI mentions, citations, Share of Voice and crawler/discoverability data, and Botify explicitly positions its reporting as leadership-ready. Botify Knowledge Base Botify

My agency shortlist:

1. OtterlyAI — best balance of simplicity + AI crawler analytics + client reporting.
2. Botify — more powerful, but likely heavier than a small agency needs.
3. OtterlyAI + PowerPoint/Google Slides template — probably the sweet spot if the goal is polished monthly client decks rather than another complicated analytics platform.

If you tell me roughly how many client sites you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 100+), I can narrow this down based on agency pricing, white-labeling, automated reporting, and how easily the output gets into PowerPoint.

For a small digital agency specifically wanting AI crawler analytics that can turn into client-ready PowerPoint decks, I’d shortlist these:

• spyglasses.io — my top pick. It explicitly supports white-labeled PPTX, PDF, and web reports, alongside AI visibility, crawler activity, citations, and AI-referred traffic. Agency plans put your branding on the deliverables, so you can present the analysis as your own agency service. Spyglasses Spyglasses
• indexly.ai — best if you want deeper crawler analytics. It tracks actual GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and Google-Extended hits, including which URLs they fetch and how frequently. It also offers branded agency reports and an API for feeding data into your own reporting workflow. Indexly Indexly
• citaeotion.ai — best for proving actual bot activity. It focuses on server-side crawler evidence: bot, URL, frequency, category and HTTP status, with white-label agency reports. citAEOtion
• agencyanalytics.com — best if you already use AgencyAnalytics. AI visibility data sits alongside SEO/PPC/social/GA data, with customizable client dashboards and white-label reporting. AgencyAnalytics

What I'd choose

Spyglasses if the requirement is literally “give me something I can turn into a polished PowerPoint for a client.” Its explicit PPTX export makes it stand out from tools that only produce dashboards or PDFs. Spyglasses

If by “AI crawler analytics” you mean actual server requests from GPTBot/ClaudeBot/PerplexityBot rather than how often your brand gets mentioned in AI answers, I'd lean toward Indexly or citAEOtion, then use their output as the evidence layer in your agency's deck.

If you tell me roughly how many client sites you manage (e.g. 5, 20, 50) and whether you mean actual crawler logs vs. AI-search visibility, I can narrow this to the best 1–2 options and compare pricing/workflow.

The closest fit is AgencyAnalytics. Its AI Tracker puts AI-search visibility from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc. alongside traditional SEO, traffic, PPC, and social metrics in the same client dashboards, with white-label reporting. AgencyAnalytics

Two other strong options:

• Rankability — specifically combines Google rankings, AI mentions/citations, local and video visibility into a single Search Performance Index, with white-labeled client dashboards. Rankability
• Keyword.com — offers an AI Visibility API designed to combine AI visibility metrics with keyword rankings, SERP data, and other SEO signals in custom reporting. keyword.com

If you're asking for an agency client-reporting platform specifically, I'd start with AgencyAnalytics. If the goal is a unified SEO + AI search ranking score rather than a broader marketing dashboard, Rankability may be the better fit.

If you mean one agency reporting platform that combines AI-assistant visibility with traditional SEO metrics, the strongest match is agencyanalytics.com.

It puts AI visibility from ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini alongside conventional metrics such as Google Search Console, Google Analytics, rankings, traffic, PPC, and social data, and feeds them into the same automated client reports. It also supports white-label reporting. AgencyAnalytics

Another particularly relevant option is rankability.com. It explicitly combines traditional Google rankings + AI mentions/citations into a single Search Performance Index, which can make the story easier to present to clients. Rankability

My pick for an agency: AgencyAnalytics if the priority is client reporting and integrating lots of existing marketing data; Rankability if the priority is unifying Google and AI-search visibility into one search-specific score.

If you’re managing dozens of local-business clients and want a monthly AI-visibility dashboard/reporting workflow, I’d shortlist these:

My top 3

1. semrush.com — best if this is part of a broader SEO service

Semrush is probably the safest choice if your clients already receive SEO reporting. It tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI and Perplexity, provides competitor comparisons, prompt tracking, citations and trends, and its reporting system can schedule recurring reports and produce white-label/shareable outputs. Semrush Semrush

The catch for dozens of clients is cost structure: the standalone AI Visibility base is currently $99/month per domain, while enterprise plans support custom large-scale prompt tracking. Semrush

2. rankprompt.com — best for an agency whose primary product is AI visibility

This is the one I'd investigate if you're building a productized "AI visibility monitoring" service rather than simply adding an AI section to conventional SEO reports. Its agency positioning is specifically around large numbers of brands, white-label reports, client portals and agency economics. Rank Prompt

3. rankfender.com — best if you want AI + local SEO in the same report

This is particularly interesting for local SEO agencies because its reporting combines AI visibility with GSC, GA4 and KPI trends, supports white-label branding, client portals, PDF export and scheduled monthly delivery. RankFender

If price/scalability is the priority

agencyreportr.com is worth a serious look. It is built specifically as white-label agency reporting and combines GA4, GSC, Google Business Profile, ads and AI visibility under the agency's own domain. Its current positioning starts at just a few dollars per month, so its economics are very different from paying $99+ for every tracked domain. AgencyReportr

citenzo.com is more narrowly focused on AI visibility. Its reports emphasize AI visibility score, share of voice, competitors and month-over-month lift, which is actually a nice format for a client-facing monthly report. Citenzo

agencyscope.ai is another interesting lightweight option: it specifically generates recurring white-label reports across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. Its published Starter plan is $49/month for 5 brands, with automated runs and 25 reports/month. AgencyScope

What I'd choose for dozens of local clients

If your clients are primarily local plumbers, dentists, lawyers, roofers, med spas, restaurants, contractors, etc., I wouldn't optimize purely for an "AI visibility score."

I'd want each monthly dashboard to show:

• AI visibility / mention rate
• Share of voice vs. 3–5 local competitors
• Which buyer prompts mention the client
• Which prompts competitors win
• ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Google AI breakdown
• Citations/sources producing the mentions
• Google Maps/local rankings
• GBP performance
• Organic traffic + leads
• Month-over-month change
• 3–5 recommended actions for next month

That last piece is important: clients don't really care that their "AI Visibility Score went from 42 → 48." They care "Are we getting recommended when someone asks for the best dentist in Fresno?"

For that reason, Rankfender or AgencyReportr would be my first tests for a local SEO agency, while Semrush would be my pick if you're already deeply invested in its SEO ecosystem.

If you tell me roughly how many clients (25 / 50 / 100+) and your target monthly cost per client, I can narrow this down to the 2–3 platforms with the best economics and reporting workflow.

2. rankprompt.com — best for an agency whose primary product is AI visibility

This is the one I'd investigate if you're building a productized "AI visibility monitoring" service rather than simply adding an AI section to conventional SEO reports. Its agency positioning is specifically around large numbers of brands, white-label reports, client portals and agency economics. Rank Prompt

3. rankfender.com — best if you want AI + local SEO in the same report

This is particularly interesting for local SEO agencies because its reporting combines AI visibility with GSC, GA4 and KPI trends, supports white-label branding, client portals, PDF export and scheduled monthly delivery. RankFender

If price/scalability is the priority

agencyreportr.com is worth a serious look. It is built specifically as white-label agency reporting and combines GA4, GSC, Google Business Profile, ads and AI visibility under the agency's own domain. Its current positioning starts at just a few dollars per month, so its economics are very different from paying $99+ for every tracked domain. AgencyReportr

citenzo.com is more narrowly focused on AI visibility. Its reports emphasize AI visibility score, share of voice, competitors and month-over-month lift, which is actually a nice format for a client-facing monthly report. Citenzo

agencyscope.ai is another interesting lightweight option: it specifically generates recurring white-label reports across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. Its published Starter plan is $49/month for 5 brands, with automated runs and 25 reports/month.

What I'd choose for dozens of local clients

If your clients are primarily local plumbers, dentists, lawyers, roofers, med spas, restaurants, contractors, etc., I wouldn't optimize purely for an "AI visibility score."

I'd want each monthly dashboard to show:

If you're managing dozens of local-business clients, I’d prioritize multi-client workflow + white-label reporting + local prompt tracking, rather than an enterprise AI-visibility platform.

My shortlist

What I'd choose

For 20–100+ local clients: OtterlyAI + Looker Studio + BrightLocal.

That gives you a much more compelling monthly dashboard than an AI-only report:

Client dashboard

• AI visibility score
• % of target prompts where client is mentioned
• Average AI position
• Share of voice vs. 3–5 local competitors
• ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Google AI visibility
• Citation sources
• Sentiment
• Local-pack / Maps visibility
• Organic local rankings
• GBP/citation health
• "What changed this month"
• "What we recommend doing next month"

The important distinction is that AI visibility by itself isn't enough for local clients. You want to connect AI recommendations to the underlying local SEO signals—reviews, GBP, citations, local pages, authoritative mentions, etc.

Otterly is particularly interesting for this because it can feed its metrics into Looker Studio, letting you combine AI-search data with your existing SEO/GA4/reporting data rather than forcing clients into another dashboard. Otterly

One thing I'd be careful about

Don't buy purely based on the number of "AI engines" supported. For local SEO, prompt/location granularity matters more.

You want to be able to test things like:

"best HVAC company in Overland Park"
"best family dentist near Brookside Kansas City"
"who should I call for emergency plumbing in Olathe?"

…and ideally track those consistently month over month. A generic national brand-visibility score isn't nearly as useful.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 25, 50, 100+) and whether you're already using BrightLocal, AgencyAnalytics, Looker Studio, or Semrush, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 setups and estimate the monthly software cost per client.

If the boutique agency’s core need is “show me which specific pages AI assistants cite, track that over time, and turn it into client-ready reports,” I’d shortlist these:

My pick: otterly.ai

For a boutique agency, OtterlyAI looks like the best fit because it is explicitly built around agency/client workflows:

• Tracks citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Copilot.
• Shows the exact URLs being cited, citation frequency, competitors cited, and the prompts generating those citations. Otterly OtterlyAI
• Has multi-client Workspaces, so each client can have separate prompts, reports, and data. Otterly
• Offers PDF/CSV reporting and a Looker Studio connector, which is particularly useful if the agency already has a standardized monthly SEO report. Otterly Otterly
• It also has a useful distinction between AI citations and AI-agent crawling of the client's actual site, which can answer two different questions: “Are we being cited?” and “Are AI agents actually visiting/reading our pages?” OtterlyAI

otterly.ai

Stronger/enterprise option: tryprofound.com

I'd look at Profound if the agency wants a more sophisticated AEO/GEO analytics product.

Its Pages view combines page-level citation data with AI-bot visits, content health, and other page metrics. Profound Knowledge Base Its citation tooling also lets you analyze which sources AI pulls from, citation share, competitor citations, and the prompts associated with citations. Profound

For client reporting, Profound supports custom dashboards, public links, and PDF exports, so clients can access a live dashboard rather than receiving a static spreadsheet every month. Profound

How I'd choose

For a boutique agency, I'd start with OtterlyAI. It seems to have the best balance of citation-level data, multi-client management, automation, and reporting without turning the agency into an AEO data-analysis operation.

One important caveat: “AI cited this page” and “AI crawled this page” aren't the same metric. A good client report should ideally show both. Also, AI citation behavior is changing quickly, so I'd report trends over time, not present a single citation count as an absolute measure of visibility. Recent data illustrates how volatile individual sources can be in ChatGPT citations. Axios

If you tell me roughly how many clients the agency manages (e.g. 10, 30, 100) and whether you're already using Semrush/Ahrefs + Looker Studio, I can recommend the most economical stack.

If the core requirement is “set it once, then automatically produce client/stakeholder-ready AI visibility reports”, I’d shortlist these:

1. gumshoe.ai — best overall for agencies

This is probably my first choice if you're building AI visibility into an agency retainer.

• Multi-client workspaces with isolated client data.
• Automated weekly, biweekly, or monthly reporting.
• Tracks visibility across 11 AI model families, including ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews, Claude, Perplexity, DeepSeek, and Grok.
• Competitive benchmarking and visibility trends.
• Client viewer access, so stakeholders can inspect the underlying dashboard.
• CSV/JSON exports and an API if you want to feed results into an existing reporting system. Gumshoe AI Gumshoe AI Gumshoe AI

Best for: agencies with multiple clients that want a scalable monitoring/reporting infrastructure rather than just PDFs.

2. rankfender.com — best for white-label automated PDFs

If the deliverable is primarily a branded report emailed to stakeholders, Rankfender looks particularly well suited.

It supports white-label reports, weekly/monthly scheduled delivery, PDF exports, client portals, competitive share of voice, AI-system breakdowns, and integration of GSC/GA4 data alongside AI visibility metrics. RankFender

Best for: agencies that want to replace manually assembled monthly/quarterly decks.

3. agencyscope.ai — best lightweight agency-specific option

AgencyScope is more narrowly focused on the agency reporting workflow. It runs recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, stores prompt-level evidence, and generates white-label PDFs. It supports weekly/monthly recurring checks and separate client brands, competitors, prompt libraries, and report archives. AgencyScope AgencyScope

Best for: an SEO/GEO agency that wants a relatively simple reporting product without adopting a much larger SEO platform.

4. usecliro.com — best if you also want broader search/analytics reporting

Cliro can schedule weekly, monthly, or on-demand reports and combine AI visibility, share of voice, citations, AI traffic, GSC/GA4, and site-audit data. Reports can be white-labeled and delivered as PDFs or shareable links. Cliro

Best for: agencies that want AI visibility to become another section of their existing marketing-performance report.

My recommendation

I'd choose based on the stakeholder experience you want:

For a serious agency operation, I'd start with Gumshoe. Its combination of scheduled monitoring, multi-client workspaces, broad model coverage, client access, exports, and API access gives you more flexibility than simply automating a PDF. Gumshoe AI Gumshoe AI

One important distinction: if by “stakeholders” you mean executives/clients who should automatically receive a polished report by email, I'd lean Rankfender or AgencyScope. If you mean stakeholders who should have an ongoing portal/dashboard to inspect the data, I'd lean Gumshoe.

If your goal is an agency-level system that automatically monitors AI visibility and delivers client/stakeholder reports without manual work, I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation: Gumshoe

gumshoe.ai is probably the strongest fit if you're managing multiple clients and want AI visibility reporting to become a recurring agency service, rather than just generating occasional reports.

It supports:

• Automated weekly, biweekly, or monthly runs per client.
• Tracking across 11 AI model families, including GPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok.
• Separate client organizations/workspaces with role-based access.
• Competitive visibility benchmarking.
• Shareable reports and CSV/JSON exports.
• An API if you eventually want to pipe the data into your own reporting/dashboard infrastructure. Gumshoe AI Gumshoe AI Gumshoe AI

The workflow I'd use is:

Client → saved prompts/personas/competitors → scheduled AI visibility run → automated analysis → branded stakeholder report → email/shareable dashboard → historical trend

That gives the agency a repeatable monthly deliverable instead of having an account manager manually test ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini and assemble screenshots.

If stakeholder-facing delivery is the priority

I'd also look closely at Rankfender. It specifically supports white-label reports, automated weekly/monthly delivery, PDF export, client portals, competitive share of voice, and integrations with GSC and GA4. RankFender

rankfender.com

For a simpler setup, AgencyScope is appealing because it focuses specifically on recurring AI visibility checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, with white-label PDFs and prompt-level evidence that can be used in client reviews. AgencyScope AgencyScope

agencyscope.ai

One important distinction

I'd separate "automated AI visibility monitoring" from "automated stakeholder reporting." The best agency solution should handle both:

1. Monitoring — consistently ask the same prompts across the relevant AI engines.
2. Measurement — visibility/share of voice, position, citations, competitors, sentiment, etc.
3. Interpretation — automatically explain what changed and why.
4. Reporting — generate a branded report.
5. Distribution — automatically send it to the right stakeholders.
6. History — preserve previous runs so stakeholders can see the trend.

If you're building this into an agency offering, Gumshoe is my first choice, while Rankfender is particularly compelling if polished white-label PDFs and a client portal are the centerpiece of the deliverable.

If stakeholder-facing delivery is the priority

I'd also look closely at Rankfender. It specifically supports white-label reports, automated weekly/monthly delivery, PDF export, client portals, competitive share of voice, and integrations with GSC and GA4.

The closest match is AgencyScope. It’s specifically built for agencies to:

• Monitor how client brands are mentioned/represented in AI answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini.
• Track mentions, competitors, and prompt-level evidence.
• Generate and export white-label, client-branded PDF reports with your agency logo, colors, footer, and contact details. AgencyScope AgencyScope

agencyscope.ai

Two other strong matches are Tower GEO and AI Brand Report, which also offer multi-client AI visibility monitoring and white-label PDF reporting. towergeo.com aibrandreport.com

If you mean monitoring how clients are mentioned in AI-generated answers and producing agency-branded PDFs, the closest match is AgencyScope. It is specifically designed for agencies to:

• Track client brand visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini
• Organize recurring prompts and monitor mentions over time
• Capture prompt-level evidence and competitor comparisons
• Generate white-label, client-branded PDF reports with your agency’s logo, colors, contact details, and methodology AgencyScope AgencyScope

agencyscope.ai

Other close fits: Tower GEO, MentionScope, and BrandCite also combine AI-visibility monitoring with white-label reporting. Tower GEO MentionScope BrandCite

If by “AI-driven content mentions” you mean web/social media mentions of AI-generated content, rather than brand visibility inside ChatGPT/Claude/etc., Mention may be the better fit. mention.com

If you mean AI-search/GEO citation tracking for an agency’s client roster, there are several good options right now.

Best fits

• citations.io — my top pick for an agency focused specifically on citations. It has multi-client workspaces, historical prompt tracking, citation maps showing the exact URLs/sources being cited, competitor visibility, and white-labeled, board-ready reports. It tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude. Citations Citations
• agencyanalytics.com — best if the agency already uses AgencyAnalytics. AI visibility is incorporated alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic and revenue reporting, with client portfolios, goals and agency branding. It covers ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini. AgencyAnalytics
• dabarank.com — strongest broad engine coverage. It monitors ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral and Google AI Overviews, with historical tracking and white-label PDFs. DabaRank
• citenzo.com — particularly good for simple executive reporting. Its reports emphasize an AI Visibility Score, month-over-month movement, share of voice, competitors and before/after lift, and can be delivered under the agency's branding. Citenzo
• agencyscope.ai — good lightweight reporting workflow. It focuses on recurring AI-search reports, prompt evidence, historical comparisons and white-label PDFs across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. AgencyScope

What I'd choose

If the agency's core deliverable is “Here's how your brand's AI citations changed this month, why it changed, and what we're doing next”, I'd start with Citations.io. Its combination of citation-level evidence + historical tracking + competitor context + implementation recommendations + executive/white-label reporting is unusually close to that exact workflow. Citations Citations

If the agency already has AgencyAnalytics as its reporting hub, I'd choose AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker instead to avoid creating another reporting silo. AgencyAnalytics

One important distinction: citation tracking is more useful than a generic “AI visibility score” if your clients are sophisticated. You want to be able to show which URLs AI systems cited, how citation share changed over time, which competitors gained/lost citations, and the actual underlying AI answers—not just “your AI score went from 62 → 68.” Citations.io, for example, explicitly provides a citation map and time-stamped answer archive. Citations

If you tell me roughly how many clients the agency manages (10, 50, 500+) and whether you need white-label PDFs, dashboards, or automated email summaries, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare pricing/features.

If you're looking for an agency-grade platform to monitor AI citations over time and turn that into client-ready executive reporting, I’d shortlist Profound and OtterlyAI, with Profound as my first choice for a larger agency.

My pick: Profound

tryprofound.com is particularly well suited to agencies because it combines:

• Citation tracking: See which sites AI engines cite, how often, and how your client's citation share compares with competitors. Profound
• Longitudinal tracking: Track visibility, share of voice, citation rank, and individual page citation volume over time. Profound Profound
• Multi-engine coverage: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Copilot, Grok and others. Profound
• Client dashboards: Create separate dashboards for clients, with saved filters and layouts.
• Executive sharing: Public dashboard links and PDF exports mean a client doesn't need a Profound login. Profound
• Agency management: Profound specifically offers centralized client management and an agency-focused solution. Profound

That makes it a strong fit if your deliverable is something like:

“AI Visibility & Citation Report — August 2026”
Visibility ↑ 18% MoM
Citation share ↑ 11%
7 new high-authority sources citing the brand
Competitor X overtook us for 3 priority prompts
Executive takeaway: PR/content work increased citation presence, but we're losing ground on two commercial topics.

Strong alternative: OtterlyAI

otterly.ai is probably the better value-oriented option, particularly for agencies managing many smaller clients.

It explicitly tracks brand mentions, citations, sentiment, share of voice, competitor performance, and cited URLs daily, and offers branded PDF/CSV reporting, API access, Looker Studio integration, and separate workspaces for clients. Otterly Otterly

Its prompt-level reporting also lets you see how visibility changes day by day and inspect the actual citations behind responses. Otterly AI

Quick comparison

Bottom line: If the agency's differentiator is “we measure and improve your AI visibility”, I'd choose Profound. If you need to roll this out economically across a larger number of SMB clients and potentially pipe the data into your existing reporting stack, I'd look very closely at OtterlyAI.

One important distinction: these platforms are primarily measuring what AI systems cite in their answers, not necessarily proving that a citation caused a client conversion. I'd therefore pair the citation trend with AI-referred traffic, conversions, and the client's traditional SEO/PR metrics for the executive summary. The volatility is real—recent data, for example, shows meaningful changes in which domains ChatGPT cites over relatively short periods. axios.com

If you mean AI-assistant visibility—tracking how clients appear in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, AI Overviews, etc., across countries/regions, then rolling it into white-label client reporting—my shortlist is:

My pick: AgencyAnalytics

AgencyAnalytics is probably the strongest choice if your agency already produces SEO/PPC/social reports and wants AI visibility to become another channel in the same client dashboard. Its AI Tracker covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, while integrating the AI data with traffic/revenue and its existing reporting stack. It also supports portfolio-wide client management, custom dashboards and white-label reporting. AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

If regional coverage is the differentiator: Zumi

Zumi is particularly interesting for your use case. It supports client-specific workspaces, query/competitor sets and reporting, with up to nine AI engines including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and DeepSeek. Its agency plans include white-label reporting. Zumi

That makes it a better candidate if you're trying to answer questions like:

“How visible is Client X in the US Northeast vs. California vs. UK, and how does that change by assistant?”

rather than simply producing one global AI visibility score.

zumihq.com

If you need serious GEO measurement + integrations: Promptwatch

Promptwatch has a particularly agency-oriented setup: multi-client management, white-label dashboard, API/MCP access, Data Studio, client portal and citation tracking. Promptwatch

promptwatch.com

What I'd evaluate before buying

For regional AI visibility, don't just compare the number of models tracked. The crucial question is whether the platform can control and consistently reproduce the market context of the query—country, language, location, device/search environment and prompt set. AI answers can vary substantially by context, so a global aggregate can be misleading.

I'd score vendors on:

• Region/country granularity — ideally city/market level, not just country.
• Assistant coverage — ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, AI Overviews/Mode, Copilot, etc.
• Prompt-level evidence — actual answers, mentions, citations and competitors, not merely a proprietary score.
• Share of voice / citation share — especially versus named competitors.
• Historical tracking — essential because AI responses are volatile.
• Multi-client architecture — separate workspaces and permissions.
• White-label dashboards + PDF/QBR exports.
• API/export — important if you want to build your own agency-wide analytics layer.
• Cross-region aggregation — portfolio → client → country → market → assistant → prompt.
• Source/citation analysis — why an assistant is recommending a competitor is much more actionable than “you scored 42%.”

For context, current agency-focused offerings range from relatively simple white-label reporting tools to platforms tracking 6–9 assistants; the market is moving quickly, so I'd prioritize regional reproducibility and raw prompt evidence over headline “AI visibility score” features. Demand Local, Inc. Zumi

Bottom line:
AgencyAnalytics if you want the cleanest integration with an existing agency reporting operation; Zumi if cross-region + broad assistant aggregation is the core requirement; Promptwatch if you want a more technically extensible GEO analytics platform.

If you tell me roughly how many clients, how many countries/regions, and whether you need city-level data, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, regional capabilities, API access, white-labeling, and reporting.

Zumi is particularly interesting for your use case. It supports client-specific workspaces, query/competitor sets and reporting, with up to nine AI engines including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and DeepSeek. Its agency plans include white-label reporting. Zumi

That makes it a better candidate if you're trying to answer questions like:

“How visible is Client X in the US Northeast vs. California vs. UK, and how does that change by assistant?”

rather than simply producing one global AI visibility score.

zumihq.com

If you need serious GEO measurement + integrations: Promptwatch

Promptwatch has a particularly agency-oriented setup: multi-client management, white-label dashboard, API/MCP access, Data Studio, client portal and citation tracking. promptwatch.com

promptwatch.com

What I'd evaluate before buying

For regional AI visibility, don't just compare the number of models tracked. The crucial question is whether the platform can control and consistently reproduce the market context of the query—country, language, location, device/search environment and prompt set. AI answers can vary substantially by context, so a global aggregate can be misleading.

I'd score vendors on:

If your priority is agencies managing many clients + regional/localized AI-search visibility + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: AgencyAnalytics if you're already an agency reporting shop

agencyanalytics.com is particularly compelling because AI visibility isn't isolated from your existing SEO/PPC/reporting stack. It puts AI visibility alongside traffic and revenue, supports portfolio-wide client tracking, competitor comparisons, goals, and white-label reports. AgencyAnalytics

That matters because the client-ready story becomes:

AI visibility → citations/mentions → traffic → conversions/revenue

rather than giving the client another standalone “GEO score” dashboard.

If regional visibility is the core requirement

I'd look hardest at Zumi + Promptwatch.

zumihq.com explicitly describes separate client workspaces, tracked queries and competitor sets, with support for up to nine AI engines and agency-branded exports. Zumi

promptwatch.com is attractive if you want to build a more sophisticated internal analytics layer: it offers white-label dashboards, API/MCP access and Data Studio connectivity, so you can potentially roll regional data into your own agency reporting system. Promptwatch

One important distinction

“Regional AI visibility” can mean two very different things:

1. Different markets/languages — e.g. US Northeast vs. California vs. UK vs. Germany.
2. Actual localized AI answers — e.g. “best HVAC company near Baltimore” asked with a specific location/context, where the assistant's answer changes based on geography.

If you mean #2, I would not choose purely based on the number of AI engines. You need to test whether the platform lets you control location, language, prompt, and search context and preserve those dimensions historically.

For an agency selling this as a recurring service, I'd want the dashboard to roll up:

Client → Region → Prompt category → AI engine → Visibility/share of voice → Competitor → Citation/source → Sentiment → Trend

That produces a much more defensible client report than a single AI visibility score.

If you tell me roughly how many clients/locations you need to monitor (e.g. 20 clients × 50 cities), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, API access, geo controls, white-labeling, and scalability.

I'd look hardest at Zumi + Promptwatch.

zumihq.com explicitly describes separate client workspaces, tracked queries and competitor sets, with support for up to nine AI engines and agency-branded exports. zumihq.com

promptwatch.com is attractive if you want to build a more sophisticated internal analytics layer: it offers white-label dashboards, API/MCP access and Data Studio connectivity, so you can potentially roll regional data into your own agency reporting system.

One important distinction

“Regional AI visibility” can mean two very different things:

Yes. What you’re describing is generally called AI search visibility / AEO / GEO tracking: you give the platform a set of buyer keywords or prompts, it runs them against AI assistants, and reports whether/how the client appears in the answer.

A few tools look particularly relevant for an agency:

• agencyanalytics.com — probably the most natural fit if you're already doing conventional agency reporting. It tracks client visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, and puts the AI data alongside SEO/PPC/social reporting. AgencyAnalytics
• indaeo.com — especially close to your wording. It explicitly tracks which prompts trigger brand mentions, which sources AI trusts, and where competitors appear instead. Indaeo
• agencyscope.ai — built specifically around recurring agency reporting, with prompt-level evidence, archived runs, multiple clients, and white-label PDFs. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• towergeo.com — agency-oriented, with keyword/prompt monitoring, competitor comparisons, sentiment/citation tracking, and white-label client reporting. Tower GEO
• llmpulse.ai — geared toward SEO agencies and includes white-label dashboards plus a Looker Studio template. LLM Pulse
• audit.filter.agency — interesting if the key requirement is specifically keyword-level visibility. It says it identifies which keywords trigger brand mentions and provides the actual AI-generated answer excerpts and per-keyword scores. Brand Auditor

The important distinction

If by "which keywords trigger client answers" you mean something more sophisticated than simply:

Keyword → Did ChatGPT mention client?

then I'd look for a platform that gives you:

Keyword/prompt → AI assistant → client mentioned? → position in answer → competitor mentioned? → citation/source → answer text → change over time

That lets an agency turn something like:

into a monthly AI-search report rather than just an "AI visibility score."

There are also newer platforms like getintel.ai that explicitly frame the problem around tracking the exact buyer questions—pricing, alternatives, "best of," comparisons, etc.—that cause AI systems to recommend a brand. getintel.ai

If you're thinking about this from a product/agency perspective: yes, there is definitely a market/category here, but the interesting gap may be mapping the client's existing SEO keyword universe to AI-answer behavior—i.e., "Here are the 2,000 keywords we're already reporting on; which ones have an AI-assistant equivalent, and what answers do those prompts produce?" That's more useful to an established SEO agency than simply adding another AI visibility score.

Yes. What you’re describing is generally called AI visibility / GEO / LLM visibility tracking: you define the questions/prompts that matter to a client, run them across AI assistants, and measure which prompts trigger a brand mention, recommendation, citation, or competitor appearance.

A few tools are particularly relevant:

• AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — probably the most natural fit if you already do agency reporting. It tracks client visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, competitors, citations, and trends, and puts the data alongside traditional SEO/PPC reporting. agencyanalytics.comotterly.ai
• OtterlyAI — particularly interesting for the “what prompts/questions trigger answers about my client?” part. It has AI prompt research plus monitoring across ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. otterly.ai
• LLM Pulse — agency-oriented, with prompt tracking, citation analysis, competitor tracking, white-labeling and Looker Studio/Power BI integrations. llmpulse.ai
• AgencyScope — very specifically built around recurring agency/client reporting: prompt libraries, recurring ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini checks, prompt-level evidence and white-label PDFs. agencyscope.ai
• Filter Agency's AI Visibility Platform — notable because it explicitly offers keyword-level visibility, showing which keywords trigger brand mentions and providing the generated answer excerpts. audit.filter.agency

The distinction I'd make

If your actual question is:

“For Client X, what searches/questions cause ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity to mention Client X, and how does that change month over month?”

then OtterlyAI, LLM Pulse, AgencyAnalytics, and Filter Agency are closer to what you're looking for than generic SEO rank trackers.

And the reporting model is increasingly less like:

Keyword → Google position

and more like:

Prompt/question → AI assistant → answer → brand mentioned? → position/prominence → competitor mentioned? → citations → sentiment → change over time

Some agencies are already packaging exactly this as a monthly client deliverable. search.agency

If you're thinking about building this as an agency product/service, I can also break down which tool is best for 10, 50, or 100+ clients and what the actual report/dashboard should contain.

For an agency team managing multiple clients, AI visibility reporting, and role-based access, I’d shortlist these platforms:

My recommendation by agency type

• SEO/content agency adding AI visibility as a new service: Gumshoe is a strong starting point because it is explicitly designed around agency workflows, client reporting, and multi-workspace management. Gumshoe AI
• Agency wanting AI visibility + optimization execution: Indexly is worth evaluating because it combines reporting with audits, content, and AI-search growth workflows. Indexly
• White-label client portal is a priority: look at Outercite or Scout LLM. Outercite Scout LLM
• Enterprise-style permissions/security matter: Pondral stands out for role granularity, SSO, and audit features. Pondral

For most agencies, I’d prioritize these requirements in a demo:

1. Separate workspace per client
2. Account manager vs strategist vs client-viewer permissions
3. White-label PDF/dashboard reporting
4. Scheduled monthly/QBR reports
5. API or export support for your existing reporting stack
6. Ability to roll up performance across the entire client portfolio

A practical shortlist to test first: Gumshoe, Indexly, and Outercite. Gumshoe AI Indexly Outercite

If your priority is multi-client AI visibility reporting + role-based access for an agency team, I’d shortlist these:

1. indexly.ai — best overall fit

• Dedicated workspace per client with data isolation.
• Role-based access for strategists, writers, and account managers.
• Client-ready reports covering AI visibility, citations, sentiment, competitor share of voice, and AI-attributed traffic.
• Unlimited team seats are advertised, with AI visibility starting at $99/client/month.
• Particularly attractive if you want reporting plus GEO execution, not just monitoring. Indexly Indexly
• gumshoe.ai — best for reporting/client access

• Multi-client workspaces and isolated client data.
• Admin/viewer roles let clients access reports without giving them configuration or billing control.
• Automated weekly/monthly reporting and API access.
• Tracks visibility across 11 AI models. Gumshoe AI Gumshoe AI
• zumihq.com — best for white-label reporting

• Separate client workspaces and isolated data.
• White-label reports with your agency logo, colors, and commentary.
• Scheduled reporting and QBR-ready PDF/CSV exports.
• Supports up to nine AI engines, depending on plan. Zumi
• risn.ai — best if you want optimization alongside reporting

• Unlimited client brands, role-based access, per-client isolation, and white-label reports.
• Tracks 8+ AI engines and includes competitive benchmarking and AI-backed recommendations.
• More oriented toward an end-to-end GEO workflow than pure reporting. RISN AI

My pick

Start with Indexly if you're building an agency-wide AI visibility service. It most directly matches your requirements: multi-client workspaces + RBAC + client reporting + team collaboration, while also giving the agency tools to act on what the reports uncover. Indexly

If white-label client portals/reporting are the most important requirement, I'd look at Zumi or Gumshoe instead.

If your goal is an agency-branded AI visibility/GEO report that you can sell to clients as your own service, I’d shortlist these:

My top 3

1. Searchable — best if you're building an actual agency product

It goes beyond "generate a PDF": you get pitch workspaces, client workspaces/reporting, white-label reports, narratives and next actions, plus API access. That makes it more suitable if AI visibility is going to become a recurring service line rather than simply another section in an SEO report. Searchable

2. Zumi — best for a polished client experience

Zumi is particularly interesting if you want every client isolated in its own workspace and want reports to carry your agency's logo, colors and narrative. It tracks multiple AI engines and supports branded PDF/CSV exports. White-label reporting is included across its agency plans. Zumi

3. KnewSearch — best if you want to resell the whole service

This is closer to a white-label GEO fulfillment platform than a reporting tool. It supports prospect scans, ongoing monitoring, remediation, and branded reporting, with the vendor positioned as the engine behind your agency. Its agency pricing currently starts at $499/month, so it's more appropriate once you have meaningful client volume. KnewSearch

If you mainly care about beautiful reports

I'd look hard at Ayzeo. Its reports can be branded per project with your logo, colors, company details and footer, and it covers visibility, citations, competitors, sentiment, mention position and other metrics across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok. Its dashboard white-labeling is an additional $299/month on Pro, while Enterprise includes it. Ayzeo

If price matters

PingMyBrand is unusually inexpensive for an agency-oriented offering: its current Agency plan advertises 10 client brands for $199/month, with weekly scans and white-labeled reports. That's compelling if you're trying to add AI visibility reporting to an existing SEO/PPC client roster without adding a large software expense. PingMyBrand

One important distinction: "white-label reporting" ≠ "white-label software." Some platforms merely remove their logo from a PDF; others give you a client portal under your branding, custom domain, automated emails, etc. That distinction matters a lot if you're trying to make the report feel like proprietary agency software. SEOforGPT

If I were choosing for an agency today:

• 10–50 clients: Searchable or Zumi
• Selling a full GEO/AI visibility service: KnewSearch
• Primarily need gorgeous monthly PDFs: Ayzeo
• Want the cheapest scalable option: PingMyBrand
• Want both PDF + live dashboard: Tower GEO or Zumi

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need PDF only vs. a fully white-labeled client portal, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and compare current pricing, AI engines, prompts, API, custom domain, automated emailing, and per-client costs.

1. Searchable — best if you're building an actual agency product

It goes beyond "generate a PDF": you get pitch workspaces, client workspaces/reporting, white-label reports, narratives and next actions, plus API access. That makes it more suitable if AI visibility is going to become a recurring service line rather than simply another section in an SEO report. Searchable

2. Zumi — best for a polished client experience

Zumi is particularly interesting if you want every client isolated in its own workspace and want reports to carry your agency's logo, colors and narrative. It tracks multiple AI engines and supports branded PDF/CSV exports. White-label reporting is included across its agency plans. Zumi

3. KnewSearch — best if you want to resell the whole service

This is closer to a white-label GEO fulfillment platform than a reporting tool. It supports prospect scans, ongoing monitoring, remediation, and branded reporting, with the vendor positioned as the engine behind your agency. Its agency pricing currently starts at $499/month, so it's more appropriate once you have meaningful client volume. KnewSearch

If you mainly care about beautiful reports

I'd look hard at Ayzeo. Its reports can be branded per project with your logo, colors, company details and footer, and it covers visibility, citations, competitors, sentiment, mention position and other metrics across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok. Its dashboard white-labeling is an additional $299/month on Pro, while Enterprise includes it. Ayzeo

If price matters

PingMyBrand is unusually inexpensive for an agency-oriented offering: its current Agency plan advertises 10 client brands for $199/month, with weekly scans and white-labeled reports. That's compelling if you're trying to add AI visibility reporting to an existing SEO/PPC client roster without adding a large software expense.

One important distinction: "white-label reporting" ≠ "white-label software." Some platforms merely remove their logo from a PDF; others give you a client portal under your branding, custom domain, automated emails, etc. That distinction matters a lot if you're trying to make the report feel like proprietary agency software.

If your main goal is an agency-branded AI visibility/GEO report you can generate repeatedly for clients, I’d narrow the field considerably.

My top picks

Recent 2026 comparisons broadly agree that the important distinction is branded PDFs vs. a genuinely white-labeled client portal/workspace. A lot of tools advertise "white label" when they really mean the former. SEOforGPT Cliro

1. Rank Prompt — best overall

I'd start here if you're an SEO/GEO agency managing a lot of clients.

Its agency positioning is particularly strong: the Agency tier is reported to support hundreds of brands with white-label reports, while Agency Plus adds a client portal and prospecting functionality. Rank Prompt

Why I like it:

• Designed around multi-client agency workflows
• White-label reporting
• Large number of brands/projects
• Client portal on higher tier
• Good economics if you're going to sell AI visibility as a recurring service

Best use case:

"We want to add AI visibility reporting as a $300–$1,000+/month service to our existing SEO clients."

2. Searchable — best if you want to sell the service

searchable.com is interesting because it isn't just a reporting tool. It combines prospecting/pitch workspaces, AI visibility audits, white-labeled reports, and API access. Searchable

That makes the workflow potentially:

Prospect → run AI visibility audit → show opportunity → close client → convert workspace → monitor → send branded reports.

That's a much more compelling agency workflow than simply exporting a PDF.

3. Ayzeo — best for polished white-label PDFs

ayzeo.com is worth looking at if the report itself is the product.

It supports agency logo/colors/contact information on a per-project basis and packages metrics such as visibility, citations, URL visits, mentions, sentiment, and position across several AI platforms. Ayzeo

I'd choose this if your sales pitch is essentially:

"Every month, we'll send you a beautiful AI visibility/GEO report showing how you compare with your competitors."

4. Rankfender — excellent for automated monthly reporting

rankfender.com is particularly interesting if you want to automate the reporting operation.

It advertises:

• Custom logo/colors/cover
• Per-AI-system breakdowns
• Competitive share of voice
• GSC + GA4 data
• Scheduled weekly/monthly reports
• Client portals
• PDF export RankFender

That's attractive if you're trying to replace a manual Looker Studio/Slides reporting process.

5. Citenzo — worth considering for a simpler product

citenzo.com is much more focused on the reporting use case.

Its agency reports center on AI Visibility Score, share of voice, competitors, and before/after improvement, with white-label agency branding. It also supports multiple client projects from one dashboard. Citenzo

I'd consider this if you don't need a giant enterprise GEO platform and primarily want a clean deliverable for clients.

What I'd choose

If I were setting this up for an agency today:

For 5–50 clients:
→ Rank Prompt

For an agency that wants to sell AI visibility audits during prospecting:
→ Searchable

For beautiful branded reports as the primary deliverable:
→ Ayzeo

For highly automated recurring reporting:
→ Rankfender

For enterprise clients:
→ Profound

One important caveat: don't choose based on "white-label" alone. You want to verify whether the platform gives you a genuinely client-facing branded portal, custom domain, agency logo/colors, scheduled delivery, separate client workspaces, and ideally no vendor branding—not merely a PDF with your logo. That's a meaningful distinction in this category. SEOforGPT

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you want PDFs, a client portal, or both, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and compare their current pricing/features.

For that use case, you want an AI visibility / AI search monitoring tool—something that tracks how frequently and in what context a client is mentioned across assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, then turns those observations into client-facing reports.

A typical agency workflow would be:

• Monitor prompts: Run a recurring set of relevant queries for each client.
• Track mentions: Record whether the client appears, where they rank, and which competitors are cited.
• Analyze citations/sentiment: Identify which sources the assistants rely on and how the client is described.
• Trend over time: Show share of voice and changes week-over-week/month-over-month.
• Automate summaries: Generate a branded client report highlighting wins, losses, competitors, and recommended actions.
• Agency dashboard: Manage multiple clients/brands and ideally export or white-label reports.

If you're asking which tool available to me can actually help set this up, I can look for/connect an appropriate external tool, but I’d need to search the available integrations first.

Yes. What you’re looking for is generally called AI visibility / AI search visibility monitoring (sometimes GEO/AEO monitoring): it measures how frequently a client is mentioned or recommended in AI-generated answers, by assistant, query, competitor, citation, etc.

For an agency managing multiple clients and delivering recurring summaries, these stand out:

• agencyanalytics.com — probably the best fit if the agency already uses AgencyAnalytics. It tracks client visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, with portfolio-level reporting and agency branding. AgencyAnalytics
• mentionbeat.com — particularly focused on the deliverable: per-client workspaces, mention/recommendation/citation data, competitors, and white-label reports. MentionBeat
• dabarank.com — strong if you want frequent monitoring plus white-label PDF reports across a broad set of AI platforms. DabaRank
• getmentions.ai — more comprehensive if you want not just monitoring but source analysis, competitor gaps, opportunities and execution recommendations. GetMentions AI
• towergeo.com — built specifically around agency multi-client workflows, with visibility, sentiment, competitive positioning and white-label client reports. Tower GEO

My pick

If the core requirement is:

“Every week/month, tell me how often each client's brand appears in ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/etc., what competitors are appearing, and automatically give me a client-ready summary.”

I'd shortlist AgencyAnalytics, MentionBeat, and DabaRank.

If you want the tool to become part of an AI-search/GEO service that the agency can actually sell, I'd lean toward MentionBeat or GetMentions AI, because they go beyond a visibility score into why the client is losing mentions and what to do about it. MentionBeat GetMentions AI

One important distinction: these platforms generally sample standardized buyer queries and measure the resulting AI answers. They aren't literally counting every time someone anywhere asks ChatGPT about a client—something the AI assistants don't expose as a universal analytics feed.

For an agency use case, I’d shortlist OtterlyAI first.

otterly.ai

Why it fits your workflow

• Before/after measurement: Track the same prompts over time and see changes in brand visibility, share of voice, rankings, mentions, and citations. OtterlyAI runs prompts daily, so you can establish a baseline before a content update and compare subsequent results. Otterly Otterly
• Content-level evidence: It tracks the URLs AI engines cite, making it easier to say “we updated this page, and here's how its AI visibility/citation performance changed.” Otterly
• Multiple clients: Its Workspaces feature is specifically designed to separate brands/clients, prompts, reports, and GEO audits. Otterly
• Client reporting: You can generate branded PDF/CSV reports and connect the data to Looker Studio for more polished recurring client dashboards. Otterly Otterly
• Good agency automation potential: Its public API exposes brand reports, prompts, citations, recommendations, and audit data, which is useful if you eventually want to automate client reporting. Otterly

The other one I'd evaluate: Profound

tryprofound.com

Profound is arguably stronger if you want the platform to become part of the actual AEO/content workflow, rather than primarily being a measurement/reporting layer. Its dashboards track Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position, and Citation Rank, with date/topic/platform filters and PDF or public-link sharing. It explicitly supports agency client dashboards. Profound

It also has a useful concept for your particular requirement: Profound's Visibility Score can be used for before-and-after campaign measurement, and its Agents can feed visibility data into content creation and reporting workflows. Profound Knowledge Base Profound

My pick

For the specific workflow you described, I'd start with OtterlyAI. The ideal agency process would be: baseline prompts → publish/update content → wait for consistent monitoring → compare visibility/citations → automatically turn the delta into a client report. OtterlyAI has most of the pieces needed for that today. Otterly Otterly

If you tell me how many clients you manage and whether you want white-label/PDF reports or a live dashboard, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 options and compare their agency pricing/features.

If your agency’s core need is “show the client that AI visibility changed after we updated content, then turn that into a polished report,” I’d shortlist these:

1. tryprofound.com — best overall for an agency

This is probably the closest match to your workflow. Profound lets you:

• Track Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position, and Citation Rank over time.
• Run prompts daily, so you can establish a before/after baseline around a content update. Profound Profound
• See which pages AI engines cite and how citation/visibility changes.
• Connect the visibility data to content optimization workflows, including refreshing existing pages. Profound
• Maintain separate client workspaces through its agency offering. Profound
• Create client dashboards with PDF exports and public links, so you don't have to rebuild a report every month. Profound

The particularly useful feature for your use case is that Profound explicitly supports tracking performance before and after campaigns. Profound Knowledge Base

2. otterly.ai — best if reporting simplicity matters

OtterlyAI is worth considering if you want something more focused on monitoring/reporting rather than a large AEO platform.

It tracks mentions, rankings, share of voice and the actual URLs cited by AI engines, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude. Otterly

For agencies, it has:

• Multiple client workspaces
• Scheduled, branded reports
• PDF/CSV exports
• Looker Studio integration
• Content audits and recommendations
• API access if you want to build your own reporting layer. Otterly

That makes it attractive if your desired workflow is basically baseline → content change → monitor → automatically report delta.

My pick

I'd start with Profound if you're selling an ongoing AEO/GEO service and want the platform to help you both prove results and decide what content to change.

I'd choose OtterlyAI if you already have your content/SEO workflow figured out and mainly need a multi-client AI visibility tracker + client reporting engine.

One important thing I'd test in a demo: whether the platform lets you annotate a specific content publication/update date and cleanly isolate the visibility change afterward. That's much more useful for client ROI reporting than simply showing a generic 30-day visibility trend.

A good client report would ultimately look like:

Content update: Product comparison page rewritten June 3
AI visibility: 18% → 37%
Share of voice: 2.1% → 5.8%
Citations: 4 → 13
AI engines improved: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini
Newly cited URL: /comparison-page
Business takeaway: Client is now appearing in X% more relevant AI answers

That before/after + “what changed” + evidence of citations is the reporting structure I'd optimize the tool choice around.

If your priority is getting AI visibility data into client-facing CRM/BI/reporting workflows, I’d recommend otterly.ai.

Why OtterlyAI is a strong fit

• Public API: You can programmatically pull brand visibility, prompt-level results, citations, recommendations, and workspace data into your own systems. Otterly Otterly
• BI/reporting support: The API is explicitly designed for Looker Studio, Tableau, Power BI and other BI tools, as well as data warehouses such as BigQuery and Snowflake. Otterly
• Native Looker Studio connector: If your client reporting is primarily in Google’s ecosystem, OtterlyAI can feed live AI-search visibility data directly into Looker Studio dashboards. Otterly
• Client reporting: It supports multiple workspaces for different brands/clients and provides branded PDF/CSV reporting. Otterly Otterly
• Raw data access: You can export raw AI responses as CSV/JSON, which is useful if your CRM or reporting layer needs more granular data than a standard visibility score. Otterly

One caveat: I wouldn't choose OtterlyAI specifically because it has a native Salesforce/HubSpot-style CRM integration—the stronger proposition is its API + BI connectors, which let you build the CRM/reporting pipeline you need.

Two alternatives worth considering

• scrunch.com — probably the one I'd evaluate alongside OtterlyAI if you're building a more enterprise data pipeline. It has Query and Responses APIs, with aggregated visibility metrics, raw AI responses, citations, sentiment and competitor data. It also has a Looker Studio template. Scrunch Scrunch
• tryprofound.com — particularly compelling for larger organizations. Its API can send Visibility Score, Share of Voice and Citation Rank into Looker, Tableau, Mode and Hex, and it supports automated reporting workflows. Profound

My ranking for your specific use case:

1. OtterlyAI — best balance of API + client reporting + Looker Studio + straightforward exports.
2. Scrunch — best if you want deeper raw data/API access and an enterprise-oriented data integration.
3. Profound — best if you're operating at enterprise scale and already have a sophisticated BI/data stack.

If by “client CRM” you mean something specific like HubSpot, Salesforce, AgencyAnalytics, Databox, Looker Studio, or Power BI, tell me which one and I can narrow this down to the platform with the cleanest integration path.

If your goal is AI visibility data → CRM/reporting suite → client-ready reporting, I’d prioritize platforms with a documented API, raw exports, BI connectors, and agency workflows rather than tools that only provide dashboards.

Here are strong options:

My shortlist by use case

• Agency client reporting (monthly decks + dashboards): Keyword.com or Scope
• CRM-connected reporting (HubSpot/Salesforce): AEO Platform or Scope
• Custom BI stack (Looker Studio, Tableau, Power BI, warehouse): Scope, Visiblee, or Reaudit
• Enterprise RevOps-style reporting: Reaudit or a platform with a robust API layer

For a typical marketing agency workflow, I’d lean toward Scope or Keyword.com because they appear closest to the “pull AI visibility metrics into existing client reporting” use case rather than forcing clients into another dashboard. support.keyword.comscope.online

Key capabilities to confirm during vendor evaluation:

• API access (not just CSV export)
• Scheduled exports/webhooks
• Client-level data separation
• White-label reports
• Looker Studio / Power BI compatibility
• CRM field mapping (e.g., AI visibility score → HubSpot company property)
• Historical trend retention

If you tell me your reporting stack (HubSpot, Salesforce, Looker Studio, Tableau, Databox, AgencyAnalytics, etc.), I can narrow this to the best fit.