Answers that do not mention Peec AI

For a small content studio on a tight budget, I’d start with a free URL-based AI visibility audit tool rather than paying for a full GEO/AEO platform.

Good one-off options:

• firecrawl.dev — probably the best fit for checking individual articles. Paste an article URL and it gives an AEO/GEO-style audit with things like crawlability, structure, schema, content citability, and AI-readiness issues. It says no signup is required for the free audit. Firecrawl
• auditzap.io — useful if you want a quick “what’s wrong with this page?” scan. It checks areas such as AI crawler access, llms.txt, structured data, semantic structure, freshness, author attribution, and question-style headings. AuditZap
• aio.io — better if you want a broader look at whether your brand/site appears in AI search results rather than just one article. AIO

For a content studio workflow, I’d do this:

1. Pick your 3–5 highest-value articles.
2. Run each through Firecrawl or AuditZap.
3. Fix recurring issues: - clearer answer-first intros
4. stronger author/expertise signals
5. headings phrased around real questions
6. better internal linking
7. structured data where relevant
8. Recheck after changes.

A note: these tools generally measure AI-readiness signals (whether content is easy for AI systems to understand and cite), not a guaranteed “will ChatGPT recommend this article” score. AI citations depend on many external factors, including authority, freshness, and the specific query. Firecrawl AuditZap

For a small studio, I’d avoid enterprise AI visibility suites until you actually need monitoring across dozens or hundreds of pages. A free audit on your best-performing content will usually reveal the biggest opportunities.

If you want a free, one-off check on individual articles, I’d start with AI Search Visibility. It lets you paste a URL and get an AI-readiness score plus prioritized fixes; the free tier currently includes 5 page audits/month, with no credit card required. AISearchVisibility

aisearchvisibility.ai

Two other good zero-cost options:

• AuditZap — especially useful for articles because it checks the actual URL for crawler access, semantic structure, freshness, author attribution, schema, and question-style headings. No signup, free forever. AuditZap
• Ahrefs AI Visibility Checker — better if you want to see whether your brand appears in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews. It's a free one-off check with no signup. Ahrefs

For a small content studio on a tight budget: use AI Search Visibility for the article itself, then manually test a few target questions in ChatGPT/Perplexity to see whether the article actually gets cited. That gives you a useful baseline without committing to a monthly GEO/AI-monitoring subscription.

Yes. For a quick, free check specifically for a local business, I’d start with one of these:

• insites.com — probably the best first stop. It’s free/no signup and checks how your business appears across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Grok, including whether your information is accurate and whether competitors are being recommended instead. Insites
• primoraly.com — particularly interesting if you want to see actual live AI answers. It checks ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini and shows which competitors they name instead. Free, no account. Primoraly
• cheers.tech — built specifically for local service businesses and checks buying-intent prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, incorporating local signals such as reviews and listings. Cheers

My pick

I'd run Insites first, then manually ask ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini 5–10 questions your customers actually ask, such as:

“Best [service] in [city]?”
“Who should I hire for [specific problem] in [city]?”
“What are the most reputable [business type] near [city]?”

The important distinction is “can AI crawl my site?” vs. “does AI actually recommend my business?” A robots.txt/technical grader can tell you the former, but you really care about the latter.

If you give me your business type + city, I can also suggest the 5–10 exact prompts I'd use to benchmark your AI visibility.

For a local business, I’d start with insites.com.

Why it’s a good fit:

• Free and no signup
• Enter your website, rather than just a brand name
• Checks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Grok
• Gives a local AI visibility score
• Shows whether AI can find you, whether your business details are accurate, and how positively you're described. Insites

Two other quick ones worth trying

• ahrefs.com — best if you want a broader brand-level check across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews. Free, no signup. Ahrefs
• cheers.tech — particularly geared toward local service businesses and checks real buying-intent queries involving your city across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. Cheers

My recommendation: run Insites first, then manually ask ChatGPT/Perplexity something like “What are the best [your service] businesses in [your city]?” Don't search for your own business name—that tests whether AI recommends you, which is the more useful metric.

If you tell me your business type + city, I can also suggest the 5–10 exact AI queries I'd use to benchmark you against local competitors.

Yes. For client SEO reports, there are a few free (or freemium) AI visibility / AI share-of-voice checkers that are useful. The catch: most free tools measure brand/domain visibility in AI answers, not a true “SEO-style SOV % across every query” like Semrush/Ahrefs rank tracking.

Good options:

For a freelancer building monthly SEO reports, I’d probably use this workflow:

1. Baseline AI visibility
   • Run the client domain through Semrush or Ahrefs.
   • Capture:
     • AI visibility score
     • mentions
     • citations
     • top cited URLs

2. Create a GEO/AI SOV section
   • Pick 10–20 buyer-intent prompts:
     • “best [service] in [city]”
     • “top [product category]”
     • “[competitor] alternatives”
   • Record:
     • Was client mentioned?
     • Position in answer?
     • Was their URL cited?
     • Which competitors appeared?

3. Report it as “AI Share of Voice”

Example:

“Brand appeared in 18% of tracked AI recommendations this month (9/50 prompts), with 6 direct website citations.”

That manual prompt tracker is often more defensible with clients than a single proprietary AI score.

If you want a free white-label client report/dashboard, that’s a harder category — most tools lock exports behind paid plans. For a freelancer, I’d look at combining a free AI visibility checker with Looker Studio + a simple prompt tracking sheet.

Yep. If you're making client-facing SEO reports, there are a few free options worth knowing about:

• ahrefs.com — probably my first choice. You can enter a brand/domain, and it shows AI mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews. The free report is limited, but it's genuinely useful for a client snapshot. Ahrefs
• rankbits.com — particularly relevant to what you're asking: it accepts a website, checks several AI surfaces, and explicitly reports share of voice, mentions, citations, and competitors. It's free/no signup and uses 3 buyer prompts. RankBits
• therankagent.com — another simple free option. You enter the website + category/search intent + optional location, and it calculates your AI recommendation share versus competitors from five buyer questions. RankAgent
• bluejar.ai — offers a free audit with 60 prompts and specifically includes AI share-of-voice/competitor benchmarking. More agency-oriented, although ongoing monitoring is paid. BlueJar

For your use case

I'd use RankBits or Ahrefs for a quick report.

One important distinction: "AI visibility score" ≠ "AI share of voice." If you're putting a number in a client's monthly SEO report, I'd label it something like:

AI Share of Voice: 18%
Your brand appeared in 18% of relevant AI responses/impressions compared with tracked competitors.

That's more meaningful than saying "AI visibility = 72/100." Ahrefs, for example, defines AI SOV as your percentage of AI impressions relative to competing tracked brands. Ahrefs Help Center

If you tell me what kind of clients you have (local businesses, SaaS, ecommerce, etc.), I can also find you the best genuinely-free tool that lets you put the result into a recurring client report, rather than just a one-off checker.

Yes. For a niche blog, I’d separate “can AI read/cite this page?” from “does AI actually mention my site?” They’re different tests.

Best free options

• frase.io — probably my first choice for your use case. You can paste a domain or individual URL, and it checks AI citations/mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. The first ChatGPT result is free, with the broader report available after email capture. Frase
• aisearchvisibility.ai — particularly good if you want to test several individual blog pages. Its free tier currently gives 5 URL audits/month, with an AI-readiness score, blockers and prioritized fixes. AI Search Visibility
• growranko.com — handy for quick technical/page-level checks. It allows 5 free checks per day and examines crawler access, llms.txt, schema, semantic structure and passage citability. GrowRanko
• auditzap.io — another good no-signup option for individual URLs. It checks nine factors including AI crawler access, schema, semantic structure, freshness and author attribution. AuditZap
• ahrefs.com — excellent for seeing whether your brand/site is actually appearing in AI answers, covering ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews. It's more brand/domain-oriented than page-audit-oriented. Ahrefs

What I'd do with a handful of blog posts

For, say, 5–10 important articles, I'd run each URL through AI Search Visibility or GrowRanko first to find technical/content problems, then use Frase or Ahrefs to see whether your site is actually being surfaced and cited.

One caveat: a “GEO score” doesn't prove that ChatGPT or Google will cite a particular article. The strongest test is an actual set of relevant questions/prompts and checking which URLs AI systems cite. Free checkers are generally snapshots rather than ongoing monitoring. Cituna

If you tell me your blog niche, I can also suggest 3–5 free tools specifically suited to that niche and show you exactly what to test on each page.

Yes. Since you only need to test a handful of blog pages, I’d favor URL-level tools rather than expensive ongoing “AI monitoring” platforms.

• aisearchvisibility.ai — probably my first pick. It audits one URL at a time, gives a citation-readiness score, and has a free first audit with no signup. AI Search Visibility
• frase.io — good for individual articles. It grades a page for AI-search readiness and suggests improvements; the first result is free without signup. Frase
• auditzap.io — useful if you want technical diagnostics: crawler access, semantic structure, schema, freshness, author attribution, etc. It says it's free, with no signup, and accepts individual page URLs. AuditZap
• aisearchready.app — particularly nice for a small blog because it's deliberately plain-English and allows 3 free audits/day. AI Search Ready
• ahrefs.com — better for answering a slightly different question: Does my brand/domain actually appear in AI answers? It checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. Ahrefs

What I'd do for your blog

For each of your 5–10 strongest articles, run AI Search Visibility or Frase and record:

1. AI-readiness/citation score
2. Whether the page is crawlable
3. Whether the article has clear, quotable passages
4. Author/expertise and trust signals
5. Schema/structured data issues
6. Whether the page is actually being cited, not merely technically accessible

That last distinction matters: a page can be perfectly crawlable yet never get cited by ChatGPT or Perplexity.

If you tell me what niche your blog is in, I can also recommend the best 2–3 free checkers specifically for that type of content and explain what scores/results I'd pay attention to.

For a quick, one-off competitor URL check, I’d use citedspy.com.

• Best fit: paste a query and it checks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Grok live, showing the actual cited URLs side-by-side. No signup for the one-off check. CitedSpy
• If you specifically want URL → “is this page cited?”: citegrade.com is very clean: enter the page URL + target query, and it tells you whether ChatGPT/Perplexity cited it and which competitors won instead. Citegrade
• Best if you want a broader competitor benchmark: citedspy.com automatically finds competitors and gives a prompt-by-prompt visibility/citation comparison. CitedSpy
• Another good zero-friction option: georion.vercel.app takes a URL + topic and checks five AI engines, including which competitors get cited instead. Georion

My pick for an agency strategist: CiteSpy if you need something you can screenshot/share with a client; Citegrade if you're literally answering “does this competitor URL get cited for this query?”

One caveat: AI citations are highly query/session-dependent, so treat a one-off result as a snapshot, not a stable ranking. Recent reporting also shows how quickly citation shares can shift. axios.com

For a quick, one-off competitor URL check, I’d use ahrefs.com first.

• Best overall: Ahrefs — free, no signup, and checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews. It also shows which domains/pages get cited, which is the useful part for competitor research. Ahrefs
• Best if you want a truly URL-centric citation snapshot: rankbits.com — accepts a website URL and reports mentions, citations, competitors, and cited URLs. RankBits
• Best multi-engine quick test: edenrank.com — one prompt across 8 AI surfaces, with the actual answers and citations returned. EdenRank
• Best if you want competitor-vs-competitor benchmarking: yogoo.ai — gives citation rates and the competitors being cited instead. Yogoo

My pick for an agency strategist: Ahrefs for the polished, defensible snapshot; EdenRank if the goal is “show me exactly what this competitor URL gets cited for right now.”

One caveat: these are snapshots, not stable rankings. AI answers are nondeterministic, so for client reporting I'd run the same prompts multiple times rather than treating one check as a definitive citation rate. citationradar.ai

If you’re just getting started with AI visibility (GEO / AI search visibility) and want a readable one-page report from a handful of sample queries, I’d start with these:

For your specific goal — “a readable one-page report for a few sample queries” — I’d try them in this order:

1. Rank.ai → easiest first look at “does AI mention me?” Rank.ai
2. Algomizer → useful if you want to paste your own customer questions and see who appears. Algomizer Audit
3. BotScope → if you want something closer to a client-facing snapshot. BotScope

A good starter test set is 5–10 queries like:

• “Best [category] companies for [use case]”
• “Who are the top alternatives to [competitor]?”
• “What is the best [product/service] in [location]?”
• “Compare [your brand] vs [competitor]”
• “Who should I hire for [problem you solve]?”

One caveat: free tools vary a lot. Some measure brand mentions, some measure citations, and some measure technical AI crawlability — they are related but not the same thing. isvisible.ai Rank.ai

If you tell me your industry and whether you care about ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or AI Overviews, I can suggest the best one and a small query set to run.

If you’re just getting started with AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) and want a readable one-page report from a few sample queries, I’d start with these:

For a beginner, I’d use this workflow:

1. Pick 5–10 realistic prompts your customers might type, such as:

• “best [category] for small businesses”
• “[your product] alternatives”
• “who are the top [service] providers in [location]”
• “compare [your brand] vs [competitor]”
• Run them through one of the report tools above.
• Look for three things:

• Are you mentioned?
• Are competitors mentioned instead?
• What sources does AI rely on? (reviews, directories, articles, your own site, etc.)

If you only want one free, readable starting point: I’d try PageLens for a quick visual report, then use Routeless if you want to inspect the actual answers behind the score. PageLens Routeless

A note: many “free AI visibility” tools are really lead magnets with limited runs or email capture, so treat the score as a directional snapshot rather than a definitive ranking.

Yes. For a small ecommerce store, there are now several free AI-visibility checkers that can tell you whether your products/site are being mentioned or cited in AI answers.

Best free options

• ecomrank.io — probably the best starting point for ecommerce. Enter your store URL and what you sell; it tests buyer-style questions against ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews and shows whether you're cited, absent, or losing to competitors. It's free with no signup. Ecomrank
• aipeekaboo.com — particularly useful if you care about individual product pages. Paste a product URL and it checks things such as price, benefits, product schema, policies, and comparison information, giving a 0–100 score. Peekaboo
• foundgpt.app — also lets you paste a specific product URL and checks whether the page has the structured data and other information AI systems need to understand and recommend the product. Free/no login. FoundGPT
• ahrefs.com — better for checking your brand/domain overall. It tests ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews and can show which pages/domains are being cited. Ahrefs

What I'd do if I owned a small store

Don't rely on a generic "AI readiness" score alone. You want to answer two different questions:

1. Can AI read my product page?

Run 3–5 important product URLs through AI Peekaboo or FoundGPT.

2. Does AI actually recommend me when someone is shopping?

Run your store through Ecomrank and test questions such as:

• "Best [product category] for [use case]"
• "Where should I buy [product]?"
• "[Product category] alternatives to [competitor]"
• "Best [product] under $X"
• "What is the best [product] for [specific customer]?"

The second test is much more meaningful. Being crawlable doesn't necessarily mean you'll be recommended.

If you tell me what you sell + your store URL, I can also look at the current free tools and tell you which one is most useful for your particular store.

Yes. For a small ecommerce store, there are a few free tools that can give you a rough idea of whether your products are appearing in AI assistant answers (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, etc.). They are still an emerging category, so no tool can guarantee exactly what every AI user sees, but they can provide useful signals. Ahrefs Ecomrank

A few worth trying:

• ecomrank.io — built specifically for ecommerce. You enter your store URL and product category; it tests buyer-style questions and shows whether your store is cited or recommended by AI answers. Ecomrank
• ahrefs.com — good for checking whether your brand appears in AI answers across several AI search surfaces. It is more brand-focused than individual SKU-focused. Ahrefs
• aipeekaboo.com — aimed at individual product pages; it checks product-page signals like pricing, benefits, schema markup, and trust information. Peekaboo
• wild-card.ai — provides an ecommerce-oriented audit looking at where products appear across AI answers and what gaps to fix. Wildcard

For a small store, I’d also do a simple manual test because it is free and often more revealing:

1. Pick 10–20 questions a real shopper might ask: - “What are the best _ for _?”
2. “Where can I buy a ___?”
3. “Compare _ vs _”
4. “Best affordable ___”
5. Ask those questions in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini.
6. Record: - whether your brand appears
7. whether your product page URL appears/cited
8. which competitors appear instead
9. what information those competitors have that you lack

For product pages specifically, the biggest things that often affect AI visibility are:

• clear product name and category
• complete specs (size, materials, compatibility, use cases)
• visible pricing and availability
• reviews/trust signals
• structured product data (schema)
• comparison-style content (“best for,” “vs,” “how to choose”) Peekaboo copymosaic.com

If you tell me your ecommerce platform (Shopify, WooCommerce, Etsy, custom site, etc.) and whether you care more about ChatGPT recommendations or AI search traffic generally, I can suggest the best checker/workflow.

For a solo blogger with limited time, I’d pick auditzap.io.

Why it fits:

• No signup and free.
• Gives an AI Visibility score rather than making you interpret a huge SEO report.
• Checks content-related factors such as semantic structure, content freshness, author attribution, and question-style headings, alongside crawlability and schema. AuditZap
• It produces a simple 9-check readout, so you can quickly decide whether a post needs work.

If you want an even more blunt “good/bad” score: searchscore.io gives an AI Search score plus SEO and conversion scores, with category-level grades and a prioritized diagnosis. searchscore.io

My quick recommendation: use AuditZap when you're checking a specific blog post; use SearchScore when you want to assess your whole blog/site.

For a solo blogger with limited time, I’d pick Frase’s free GEO Score Checker. It’s specifically page-level: you paste a URL, it gives the page a grade for AI-search readiness, and points out what to improve. The first result is free with no signup. Frase

frase.io

Two good alternatives:

• Tadaaah — probably the simplest “am I good or not?” experience: it gives an AI-readiness score, a plain-language verdict, and suggested fixes. Tadaaah
• Website Verdict — better if you want one overall score covering both traditional SEO and AI visibility, with prioritized fixes. Free scans are available without an account. Website Verdict

My quick ranking for your use case:
Frase → Tadaaah → Website Verdict

If your goal is specifically “paste my blog post URL and tell me in 30 seconds whether I should change anything,” Frase is the one I’d start with.

If you run a SaaS docs site, I’d look for a grader that checks actual citation behavior (does an assistant cite your docs URLs?) rather than only “AI SEO” scores.

A few free or freemium options:

• rank.ai — probably the closest match to your use case. You enter a prompt + domain, and it checks whether assistants mention your site and whether your pages are cited. It compares multiple assistants side-by-side. Rank.ai

• Good for: “When someone asks How do I integrate X?, does the AI cite our docs?”
• aisearchvisibility.ai — URL-level audits. Useful for individual docs pages because it scores things like AI citeability, structure, schema, trust signals, and extraction friendliness. AI Search Visibility

• Good for: finding why a specific API reference page or tutorial is not being surfaced.
• app.citecue.com — has lightweight checks around AI visibility and citation readiness. CiteCue

• Good for: quick diagnostics before building your own system.

For a SaaS docs-specific grader, I’d also consider building a simple internal one. The signal you probably care about is:

1. Pick 20–50 real customer questions:

• “How do I authenticate with API X?”
• “How do I migrate from Y?”
• “Does product support feature Z?”
• Run those prompts against:

• ChatGPT
• Claude
• Gemini
• Perplexity
• Track:

• Was your domain cited?
• Which docs URL was cited?
• Was a competitor cited instead?
• Did the answer use your docs correctly?
• Citation rate by doc section

A useful score could be:

Docs AI Citation Score =
(cited answers / total test prompts) × 100

+
(correct page cited × 0.5)
+
(answer accuracy × 0.5)

For SaaS docs, I’d prioritize:

• API reference pages
• getting-started guides
• integration tutorials
• troubleshooting pages
• pricing/limits pages

Those are the pages users ask AI about most.

One caveat: no free grader can truly guarantee “ChatGPT will cite this page,” because citations depend on the model, retrieval system, query wording, freshness, and competing sources. Treat these as benchmarks you can trend over time rather than a permanent ranking. Rank.ai

If you want the most useful version for a docs team, I’d probably combine a URL-level auditor with a monthly prompt-based citation test.

Yes. For a SaaS docs site, I’d distinguish “is my domain mentioned?” from “are my actual docs pages being cited for the questions they should answer?” The latter is what you want.

Good free options

• Citegrade — probably the closest fit. You enter a specific URL + target query, and it checks ChatGPT and Perplexity in real time, showing whether your page was cited, its citation position, and which competitor pages were cited instead. Its free tier includes citation verification. citegrade.com
• CitedSpy — useful if you want breadth. It runs the same query across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Grok and shows the actual cited URLs. No signup is required. www.citedspy.com
• Rank.ai's free AI visibility checker — simpler brand/domain-level test across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. It distinguishes being mentioned from actually being cited. www.rank.ai
• Frase's free AI Visibility Checker — another easy domain-level check; Frase also has a page-level GEO grader and an agent-readiness checker. www.frase.io
• CiteRank — more SaaS-oriented: it generates buyer questions and reports which sources AI cites, plus competitor gaps. The free diagnostic is one website/project. citerank.io

What I'd do for a docs site

I'd use Citegrade or CitedSpy rather than a generic “AI visibility score.”

Take your 10–20 highest-value docs pages and create 2–5 natural-language questions for each. For example:

“How do I configure SSO in [product]?”
“Does [product] support SCIM?”
“How do I troubleshoot a 401 from the API?”
“What is the difference between X and Y in [product]?”

Then record:

That gives you a much more actionable docs citation coverage metric than a generic AI visibility score.

One important caveat: AI citations are nondeterministic, so a single pass shouldn't be treated as definitive. Run each important query multiple times and measure citation rate rather than simply yes/no. Citegrade explicitly notes that results can vary between sessions. citegrade.com

If you tell me what your SaaS does and what docs stack you use (Mintlify, Docusaurus, ReadMe, GitBook, custom, etc.), I can suggest a free testing setup specifically for your docs, including how I'd choose the queries and score the pages.

For a free, one-time competitive AI-visibility snapshot, I’d start with ahrefs.com.

Why it fits:

• No signup required
• Checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, and Google AI Overviews
• You can check competitor brands/domains, not just your own
• Gives you mentions, topics triggering mentions, and the domains/pages being cited
• It’s explicitly positioned as a one-time snapshot, rather than requiring a monitoring subscription. Ahrefs

If you specifically want to paste competitor URLs

Try pagelens.ai. It accepts a domain and runs buyer-oriented prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, showing visibility, competitors, sentiment, and citation sources. It says the audit is free and requires no signup. PageLens

Another good option is aisearchvisibility.ai, which is more URL/page-centric: it scores citation readiness across seven dimensions and explicitly says competitor URLs can be audited. The free account provides five audits/month. AI Search Visibility

My pick for your use case:
Ahrefs if you want “How visible is this competitor brand in AI answers?”
PageLens if you want “Why is this competitor URL/page likely getting cited?”

If you give me the 3–10 competitor URLs, I can also suggest the quickest way to structure a comparable snapshot so the scores are actually apples-to-apples.

For a free, one-time competitive AI-visibility snapshot across several URLs, I’d start with citedspy.com.

• Why it fits: no signup, free, and it checks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Grok live. It reports visibility score, competitor share of voice, prompt-level rankings, sentiment, and the sources AI cites. CitedSpy
• Competitive angle: it can automatically identify competitors, rather than requiring you to build the comparison manually.
• For several competitor URLs: run each competitor/domain through the checker and put the resulting scores, mention rates, and cited domains into a simple comparison sheet.

Good alternatives

• ahrefs.com — probably the safest established-vendor choice. It's explicitly free, requires no signup, and is designed as a one-time snapshot; the free version has a limited preview. Ahrefs
• citegauge.com — particularly convenient if you want to enter your site plus up to 3 competitors in one audit. It checks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity and is free/no-signup. CiteGauge
• pagelens.ai — another no-signup snapshot, with 10 buyer prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity and competitor/citation analysis. pagelens.ai

My pick: CitedSpy for breadth; CiteGauge if you specifically want a quick you vs. 3 competitors comparison.

One caveat: these are snapshots, not a definitive measurement of “AI visibility.” Different runs/prompts can produce different results, so for competitive research I'd keep the exact prompts, date, engines, mention/rank, and cited URLs alongside the scores.

For a tiny in-house SEO team, I’d start with ahrefs.com.

Why it’s the best fit:

• Free, no signup for the snapshot.
• Checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode.
• Shows top cited pages, which is especially useful if your goal is figuring out whether your landing pages are actually being surfaced/cited.
• Gives you mentions by platform and the topics triggering visibility. Ahrefs

One important caveat

If by “AI visibility data for top landing pages” you mean “take my top 20 organic landing pages and tell me which ones are getting cited in AI answers”, the free checkers generally aren't that granular.

I’d use this lightweight workflow:

1. Pull your top landing pages from Google Search Console/GA4.
2. Put the 10–20 highest-value URLs into a sheet.
3. Use Ahrefs’ free checker for the overall brand/domain picture and identify its top cited pages.
4. For individual pages, run a URL-level technical/citability audit with something like auditzap.io. It accepts a specific URL and checks things such as AI crawler access, semantic structure, freshness, author attribution and question-format headings. AuditZap
5. For actual query-level AI visibility, seomonitor.com is worth testing—it can take a domain, keyword, URL, or question and ties its report to real Google search demand. Its free first report requires no account. SEO Monitor

My pick: Ahrefs for the “are we visible/cited?” baseline, then a URL-level checker for the “which landing pages are AI-ready?” question.

If you tell me whether you’re using GSC, GA4, or both, I can give you a simple free workflow to turn your top 20 landing pages into an AI visibility scorecard without buying an enterprise GEO tool.

For a tiny in-house SEO team, I’d start with Ahrefs’ free AI Visibility Checker.

ahrefs.com

Why it’s the best fit:

• Free, no signup, and checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. Ahrefs Ahrefs
• Crucially for your question, it shows the top cited pages associated with your brand—not just a generic visibility score. Ahrefs
• You can use it to identify which of your landing pages are already getting cited, then prioritize the pages that should be getting cited but aren't.

If you want a second free check

Semrush AI Search Visibility Checker is also excellent and gives you an especially useful view of which pages from your site drive AI citations, plus topics/prompts and estimated reach. It's free up to three checks/day. Semrush

semrush.com

One caveat

Neither free checker is really a page-by-page AI visibility tracker. They're better for discovering which URLs are being cited. For a tiny team, I'd combine that with your top landing pages from Google Search Console and make a simple spreadsheet:

Landing page → target topic → AI mentions → AI citations → competitors cited → action

That gives you a surprisingly useful lightweight GEO/AEO prioritization system without paying for an enterprise platform. Ahrefs' paid Brand Radar is the step up if you eventually need ongoing tracking, competitor benchmarking, and historical data. Ahrefs Help Center Ahrefs

If your real goal is “take my top 20 organic landing pages and tell me which ones are visible/cited in AI search”, I can also suggest the cheapest workflow to do exactly that.

If you mean a free tool where you paste one specific URL and get a one-off AEO/GEO analysis, there are several good options right now:

• firecrawl.dev — probably my first pick. Free, no signup, analyzes a single page for AEO/GEO, crawler access, structured data, citability, trust, entity clarity, and llms.txt, then gives prioritized fixes. Firecrawl
• frase.io — particularly relevant if you're a content strategist: its free page-level check evaluates how ready a page is to be cited by AI search and suggests improvements. Frase
• seowrench.com — explicitly designed for one page at a time, with no signup. It combines conventional SEO checks with GEO/AI-readiness checks and explains the highest-impact fixes. SEOWrench
• novaverb.com — useful if you want a more evidence-oriented assessment rather than a proprietary "AI visibility score." It checks retrieval, answer extraction, attribution, and topic structure from the actual page. Novaverb
• essel.ai — free for a single page, no signup, with separate GEO/AEO and AI-discoverability analysis and concrete fixes. Essel

My pick for your use case

As a content strategist exploring AI answer optimization, I'd start with Firecrawl for a broad AEO/GEO diagnosis, then Novaverb if you want to understand why particular passages are or aren't extractable/citable.

One caveat: these tools generally measure AI-readiness/citability signals; they don't prove that ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity will actually cite the page for a particular query. Novaverb is unusually explicit about that distinction. Novaverb

If you tell me whether you're primarily optimizing editorial/blog content, product pages, or service/landing pages, I can narrow this to the 2–3 tools I'd actually use and explain what each one catches that the others miss.

If you mean a free, page-level AEO/GEO audit where you paste a specific URL and get a one-off analysis, these are the strongest options I found:

• getaeoboost.com — probably the closest match. It audits individual pages across 60+ AI-readiness signals and gives prioritized fixes. The free tier currently includes 3 page audits. AEO Boost
• querylantern.com — free single-page SEO/AEO/GEO audit, no signup. Gives scores, blocking issues, and quick wins. Particularly useful if you're evaluating answer clarity, extractability, citation readiness, and machine readability. QueryLantern
• geoready.dev — free URL audit with no account required, focused specifically on whether AI systems can reach, understand, and cite the page. GeoReady
• aeoscored.com — paste a URL or content and get a 0–100 AEO score across eight dimensions, with recommended fixes. No signup. AEO Score
• emayil.com — explicitly offers a free single-page audit, with checks around AI crawlability, answer summaries, author/entity signals, schema, etc. Emayil

My pick for a content strategist

I'd start with AEO Boost if your goal is “Why isn't this particular page being used/cited in AI answers, and what should the content team change?” Its report is oriented toward extractability, answer clarity, citation readiness, and actionable content fixes, rather than just traditional technical SEO. AEO Boost

If you want something more transparent/diagnostic, try QueryLantern or GeoReady alongside it. Their scoring methodology is more explicitly broken into the signals that matter for AEO/GEO. QueryLantern GeoReady

If you tell me what kind of pages you're analyzing (e.g. SaaS product pages, editorial articles, ecommerce category pages), I can narrow this to the 2–3 tools I'd actually use for that workflow.

Yes — but there’s an important distinction: “Can AI assistants access my article?” is different from “Are AI assistants actually quoting/citing my article?”

For a freelance copywriter, I’d start with these free options:

• ahrefs.com — probably the best first stop. It’s free with no signup and checks how your brand/site appears in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews. It also shows which domains/pages are being cited. Ahrefs
• zionlabs.io — particularly interesting for your use case because you can enter a domain and it checks whether AI systems mention or cite it. It's free, no login/email, and currently checks ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude. Zion Labs
• aisearchvisibility.ai — more page-oriented: you can audit an individual URL and get an AI-readiness/citation-oriented score. The free tier currently provides 5 URL audits/month. AI Search Visibility

But for your exact question, I'd do this

If you're wondering:

“I wrote this article. Is ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini actually using or citing passages from it?”

Don't rely solely on a generic “AI visibility score.” Test the article's subject matter with the actual assistants.

Take 5–10 questions that your article answers and search them in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Look for:

1. Whether your site/article is cited.
2. Whether a distinctive fact, statistic, phrase, or recommendation from your article appears.
3. Whether the assistant paraphrases information that is particularly distinctive to your article.
4. Whether competitors are being cited instead.
5. Whether your page is accessible to AI crawlers in the first place.

For ongoing client work, OtterlyAI is closer to the professional solution: it monitors prompts across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot and identifies mentions/citations. It currently offers a free trial, but its ongoing plans are paid. Otterly AI Otterly

My pick: use Ahrefs for a quick free snapshot, then manually test your article's specific claims/questions in the assistants. That's much more useful to a copywriter than a generic “AI readiness” score.

If you give me one of your article URLs, I can also show you exactly how I'd test whether that particular article is appearing in AI answers.

Yes. For a freelance copywriter, I’d distinguish between two things:

1. “Can AI assistants find/cite my article?” — checks a specific URL.
2. “Does AI actually quote/use my article when answering questions?” — much more useful for measuring AI visibility.

Best free options right now

• frase.io — probably my first choice. You can enter your domain or a specific article URL. It checks whether ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini cite you. The ChatGPT result is free without signup; the other results can be unlocked for free with email. Frase
• ahrefs.com — free, no signup. It checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, and reports cited pages/domains. This is particularly useful if you're trying to demonstrate AI visibility to clients. Ahrefs
• edenrank.com — interesting for your particular use case because you can supply a brand/site plus an actual prompt, then see the live answers and citations across eight AI surfaces. Free/no signup for one prompt. EdenRank

One important caveat

A normal “AI visibility grader” isn't necessarily telling you whether AI assistants are using your exact article excerpt. Many are measuring whether your domain/brand is mentioned or cited.

For a copywriter, I'd test it like this:

Article: your article URL
Prompt: the question your article is intended to answer

Then look for whether the AI response:

• cites your URL,
• mentions your site,
• reproduces distinctive ideas/phrasing from the article,
• or gives an answer clearly informed by the article without citing it.

I'd use Frase + Ahrefs, then manually run 5–10 highly specific questions in ChatGPT/Perplexity. AI answers change frequently, so a single “score” shouldn't be treated as definitive. Frase Ahrefs

If by “article excerpts” you mean you have, say, 10–20 specific paragraphs and want to know whether ChatGPT/Claude/Perplexity are actually surfacing those passages, I can point you to the best free tool/workflow specifically for passage-level checking.

Yes. If the goal is something you can pull up during a sales meeting, run in 2–5 minutes, and immediately get a score, there are several free options.

My picks for an agency

• Best general-purpose: metasysltd.com — 8 questions, about 2 minutes, instant score, covering data, team, processes, and leadership. This is probably the cleanest meeting demo. MetaSys
• Best deeper diagnostic: mercuryminds.com — 20 questions, about 4 minutes, instant 0–100 score plus breakdown across data, automation, platforms, and team/process. No email required. MercuryMinds
• Best for a website-focused pitch: hoshirolabs.com — enter the prospect's URL and get a scan in roughly 20 seconds, with 14 dimensions including structured data, AI discoverability, semantic clarity, APIs/actions, and agent interaction readiness. Hoshiro Labs
• Another very fast option: parix.ai — 12 questions, roughly 2 minutes, with the score updating live and a downloadable report. Parix.ai

What I'd do in your meetings

I'd actually use two different checks:

1. Prospect's website → 30-second AI/agent scan
2. Prospect's business → 2-minute readiness assessment

Then your pitch becomes:

"Let's see where you are right now."

Run the scan live, show the score/gaps, and then ask:

"If we could fix the three lowest-scoring areas and identify one workflow worth automating, would that be useful?"

That turns "AI readiness" from an abstract consulting conversation into a visible before/after problem.

One caution: these are self-assessments, not genuine technical audits. I'd position the score as a conversation starter, not as an authoritative measure of AI maturity.

If you're building this into your agency's sales process, I can also help you identify the best existing free checker to white-label/replicate—or design a 3-minute agency-specific scorecard that feels much more impressive in a live pitch.

Yes. For a small agency selling AI-readiness/discovery, I’d prioritize tools that are fast, ungated, show the score immediately, and give you something visual to discuss live.

Best fits for a live sales meeting

• tillerbridge.com — probably my first choice. ~5 minutes, six dimensions, and the result appears on-screen with no email gate. It explicitly says the assessment runs in the browser. Tillerbridge
• metasysltd.com — 8 questions / ~2 minutes, instant tier and recommendation. Excellent if you only have a few minutes in a pitch. MetaSys
• aiusecasefinder.com — interesting for an agency because it goes beyond readiness and suggests specific AI use cases after the assessment. It claims ~2 minutes and no signup. AI Use Case Finder
• neaigroup.com — five dimensions, instant score, no signup required. The output is particularly easy to explain: e.g. 60/100 = “Needs Preparation,” with dimension scores. NeuralEdge AI Group

What I'd actually do in your pitch

Don't position the tool as the assessment. Position it as a 5-minute AI readiness snapshot:

“Rather than give you another AI presentation, let's score where you are right now. We'll spend five minutes on it, and you'll leave knowing your biggest readiness gap and where I'd look for the first AI opportunity.”

Then run the assessment with the prospect answering live.

The killer sales transition is:

Score → weakest dimension → business process → specific AI opportunity → potential ROI → paid readiness engagement.

For example:

“You're strong on tooling, but your process maturity is low. That tells me buying another AI tool probably isn't the answer. Let's look at one workflow and see whether we can quantify the opportunity.”

That makes the checker a diagnostic device, rather than a gimmicky quiz.

If you're going to do this repeatedly, I'd actually consider making your own 10-question branded version in something like Tally/Typeform with your agency's scoring model. That gives you ownership of the methodology and lets the result naturally lead into your paid offer.

For a non-technical founder who wants “paste something in and see the answer,” I’d start with rank.ai.

My pick: Rank.ai

• Free
• No signup
• No API key
• You enter one prompt + your domain
• It checks ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini
• It shows the actual answers, whether your brand was mentioned, and whether your site was cited. Rank.ai Rank.ai

That last point is important: for a founder, I’d much rather see “ChatGPT recommended these 5 competitors and ignored you” than receive a mysterious GEO/AI-readiness score.

If you want broader coverage

edenrank.com is probably the most interesting free alternative right now. It claims to run one prompt across 8 AI surfaces—ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Copilot, and DeepSeek—with no signup. EdenRank

ahrefs.com is another strong zero-setup option, especially if you want a recognizable SEO vendor. Its free checker covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews. Ahrefs

One important distinction

Some “AI visibility checkers” don't actually ask AI models what they think of your brand. They audit things like robots.txt, llms.txt, schema, headings, and crawler accessibility.

For example, isvisible.ai gives you a free technical accessibility score, while auditzap.io checks nine technical/content signals. Those are useful, but they're answering a different question: “Can AI systems access/read my site?” rather than “Do AI systems actually recommend me?” isvisible.ai AuditZap

Bottom line: Start with Rank.ai for the simplest founder-friendly reality check. If you want to sanity-check the result across more AI engines, run the same prompt through EdenRank afterward.

If you tell me what your company sells + your website, I can also give you the 5 prompts I'd use to test your AI visibility (the prompts matter more than the checker).

If you're a non-technical founder and mean “paste my website/brand in and tell me whether AI engines can see/recommend me,” I’d start with rank.ai.

My picks

1. Best overall: Rank.ai

• Free
• No registration
• No API key or setup
• Tests ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini
• You give it a prompt + your domain and it shows whether you're mentioned/cited. Rank.ai
• Best for a deeper website audit: firecrawl.dev

• Free, no signup, no API key
• Checks crawler access, structured data, content citability, entity clarity, llms.txt, etc.
• Better for answering “what should I fix on my website?” than “does ChatGPT recommend me?” Firecrawl
• Best for actual brand visibility across more engines: citedspy.com

• No signup
• Checks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Grok
• Gives visibility score, competitors, rankings, sentiment and cited sources. CitedSpy
• Simplest technical/accessibility check: isvisible.ai

• No signup
• Paste your domain
• Checks whether AI crawlers can access your site and gives a 0–100 score. isvisible.ai

What I'd actually do

For a founder, I'd run Rank.ai first, then Firecrawl.

That's because “AI visibility” has two different meanings:

A. “Does AI recommend my company?” → Rank.ai / CitedSpy
B. “Is my website technically accessible and understandable to AI?” → Firecrawl / IsVisible

Don't put too much weight on a single “AI visibility score.” The most useful signal is whether you appear for the specific questions your potential customers actually ask, and which competitors and sources appear instead.

If you tell me what your company does + your website, I can also tell you exactly which 5–10 prompts I'd use to test your AI visibility.

If you want fast + free + ecommerce-focused, I’d start with ecomrank.io. It takes a store URL + niche, runs buyer-intent questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, and shows which stores/sites get recommended instead. It’s free, no signup, and takes about a minute. Ecomrank

A few good alternatives:

• aigely.com — particularly nice for ecommerce: its free scan gives a share-of-voice figure, tests 10 shopping prompts, and supports US shoppers. Aigely
• rankbits.com — gives share of voice vs competitors, mentions vs. citations, and lets you supply your own prompts. RankBits
• citedspy.com — best if you want a competitor leaderboard and prompt-by-prompt rank heatmap across five AI engines. CitedSpy

My pick for a budget ecommerce marketer: Aigely for the quickest “what percentage of the AI shelf do I own?” snapshot; Ecomrank if you also want to see who is taking your recommendations and on which buyer questions.

One caveat: these are sample-based AI SOV checks, not a definitive market-wide percentage. AI answers vary by prompt, engine, location, and time, so use the same prompt set when benchmarking improvements.

If you want quick + free + ecommerce-focused, I’d start with ecomrank.io. It’s free, no signup, takes about a minute, and tests buyer questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, showing which stores get recommended instead of you. Ecomrank

A few good alternatives:

• rankbits.com — particularly useful if you specifically want a share-of-voice breakdown and competitor list. It checks 3 buyer prompts across ChatGPT, Google Search, and AI Overviews. RankBits
• citedspy.com — broader engine coverage (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok) and gives a competitor SOV breakdown plus prompt-level rankings. CitedSpy
• ahrefs.com — excellent for a quick brand baseline; free and no signup, with mentions, topics, and cited domains/pages. Its full competitor SOV tracking is part of the paid Brand Radar product. Ahrefs

My pick for a category page: Ecomrank for the fastest practical check; RankBits if SOV itself is the metric you care about most.

One caveat: these tools generally measure brand/product mentions in AI answers, not whether that exact category URL is being cited. If you're trying to answer “Is my /category/shoes page winning AI citations vs competitors?”, that's a more specific test.

If your goal is a concise, client-shareable AI visibility grade, I’d shortlist these:

1. answerpeek.com — best fit for client-facing SEO work. It gives a 0–100 score based on live buyer-style queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, and shows which competitors get recommended instead. That makes the score much more meaningful than a purely technical crawlability grade. Answer Peek
2. edenrank.com — best ultra-simple free option. One prompt across 8 AI engines, with a 0–100 score, full answers, citations, and a shareable link. No signup. EdenRank
3. ahrefs.com — best recognizable brand for client reports. It checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews and reports mentions, topics, and cited domains. Ahrefs
4. isvisible.ai — best if you want a technical “AI readiness” grade. It produces a 0–100 score + letter grade, with an agent-by-agent breakdown of robots.txt/AI crawler access and llms.txt. isvisible.ai

My pick for a freelance SEO consultant

Use AnswerPeek or EdenRank for the headline client metric. They're measuring the thing clients actually care about: “When someone asks AI who to hire/buy from, does my brand appear?”

I'd put something like this in a monthly/client audit:

AI Visibility: 64/100 — C+
Mentioned by 3/4 AI platforms for priority commercial queries. Competitor X appears more frequently and receives more citations.

That is considerably more compelling in an SEO report than “your llms.txt is missing.”

One caveat: these scores aren't standardized industry metrics. Treat them as a repeatable benchmark, not an objective equivalent of a Google ranking. EdenRank, for example, bases its score on whether the brand appears across the engines for the tested prompt. EdenRank

If you want, I can also give you the 3 best free tools specifically for generating a polished, white-label-ish PDF/report you can send to SEO clients.

Yes. If your goal is “paste client URL → get one simple grade → share it in an audit/proposal,” I’d shortlist these:

• Best overall: CitationDesk — gives a 0–100 AI Visibility Score, no signup, in about 90 seconds. It grades SEO foundation, GEO readiness, entity coherence, and AI-crawler health, and is explicitly designed around ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. CitationDesk citationdesk.com
• Best for a genuinely client-friendly shareable report: RankBits — produces a 0–100 score, mentions/citations, competitor landscape, and a public shareable report URL. RankBits rankbits.com
• Best if you want the score to reflect actual AI recommendations: EdenRank — runs a prompt across 8 AI/search engines and gives a 0–100 visibility score plus a shareable scorecard. EdenRank edenrank.com
• Best established SEO-brand option: Semrush AI Visibility Checker — free and gives an AI Visibility Score plus brand mentions, citations, topics, and pages generating citations. Semrush semrush.com

What I'd use as a freelance SEO consultant

CitationDesk for a quick prospect/client audit, and RankBits when you want something visually/shareably packaged.

One caveat: don't present an AI visibility grade as equivalent to a Google ranking. These tools measure different things—some measure technical readiness to be cited, while others measure whether AI engines actually mention/cite the brand. That's an important distinction when putting the number in a client report. CitationDesk RankBits

If you want, I can also give you the 3 best free tools specifically for generating a polished “AI SEO scorecard” you can put in client proposals, ranked by how professional the output looks.

If the goal is “show investors that we have an AI-search visibility risk”, I’d use Ahrefs’ free AI Visibility Checker first.

• Best overall: ahrefs.com — free, no signup, and checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and AI Mode. It gives you mentions, topics, and the domains/pages being cited. That makes a pretty compelling investor slide. Ahrefs
• Best for a simple “before/after” demo: rank.ai — runs the same prompt through ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini and shows mentions/citations side by side. Rank.ai
• Best if you want a clean score: semrush.com — gives an AI Visibility Score plus mentions, platforms, cited pages, topics, and estimated audience reach. Semrush
• Good lightweight alternative: edenrank.com — tests one buyer prompt across eight AI surfaces and produces a 0–100 score plus the actual answers/citations. EdenRank

How I'd demonstrate the risk to investors

Don't just show “our score is 27/100.” That's easy to dismiss as a proprietary metric.

Instead, run 5–10 questions that a prospective customer might actually ask:

“What are the best [category] tools for a [target customer]?”
“What are alternatives to [competitor]?”
“Which [category] startups are best for [use case]?”

Then capture:

You → competitors → who gets recommended → which sources AI cites.

If your company is absent while competitors are repeatedly recommended, that's a much more tangible statement:

“A buyer asking an AI assistant for a solution in our category may never encounter us, despite our existing SEO/brand investment.”

For an investor deck, I'd probably make the slide “The AI Discovery Gap” and show 3–5 real prompts with your brand highlighted in green/red versus competitors.

If you give me your startup + category + 2–3 competitors, I can also suggest the exact prompts I'd use to make the demonstration as investor-friendly as possible.

For an investor-facing demonstration, I’d use Ahrefs’ Free AI Visibility Checker first. It’s free, requires no signup, and checks your brand across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews. It also shows mentions, topics, and the domains/pages being cited alongside your brand. Ahrefs

ahrefs.com

My shortlist

• Ahrefs — best for an investor demo. Broad engine coverage and recognizable brand credibility. Good for showing, “Here is how often AI systems surface us versus the market.” Ahrefs
• Semrush AI Search Visibility Checker — good alternative if your investors are familiar with Semrush. It reports an AI visibility score, mentions, platforms, cited pages, and topics/prompts. Semrush
• Rank.ai — particularly useful for a live before/after demonstration because you supply one actual buyer prompt and it runs that prompt across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Rank.ai
• EdenRank — strongest if you want to make the demo visually compelling: one prompt across 8 AI engines, with answers, citations, and a shareable 0–100 score. EdenRank

How I'd demonstrate the risk to investors

Don't just show a generic “AI visibility score.” Use 3–5 high-intent prompts that correspond to your actual buying journey, for example:

“What are the best [category] tools for a startup?”
“What are alternatives to [competitor]?”
“What [category] software should a 50-person company use?”
“Compare [your company] vs [competitor].”

Then capture:

Prompt → AI answer → Were we mentioned? → Which competitor was mentioned? → Who got cited?

That makes the argument much stronger: “A potential buyer can ask AI for a recommendation today, and our company may not even enter the consideration set.”

One caveat for investors: a free checker is a snapshot, not proof of market-wide AI visibility. Different runs can produce different answers, so I'd present it as evidence of an emerging distribution risk, rather than claiming the score represents a precise percentage of lost customers. cituna.com

If you give me your startup + category + 2–3 competitors, I can suggest the exact 5 prompts I'd use for the investor demo.