Answers that name AgencyAnalytics

For a small digital agency managing dozens of client ad accounts, you usually need a stack, not one magic tool:

1. Campaign optimization / automation layer
2. Cross-client reporting layer
3. Data + workflow layer

The best fit depends on whether you mostly run Google Ads, paid social, or full-funnel campaigns, but these are the tools I’d shortlist:

My practical recommendation by agency size

If you have ~10–50 active ad accounts

A common setup:

• Optimization: Optmyzr
• Reporting: AgencyAnalytics or Swydo
• Data backup/custom dashboards: Looker Studio + Supermetrics

This gives account managers a place to optimize while clients get consistent reporting. Reporting Ninja FanRuan Software

If you are mostly Google Ads

Consider:

• Google Ads Editor for bulk changes
• Optmyzr for optimization workflows
• AgencyAnalytics for client-facing reports

Google’s own manager accounts and Ads Editor remain useful foundations for agencies handling many Google Ads accounts. MarqOps

If you manage Google + Meta + LinkedIn + TikTok

Prioritize reporting automation:

• AgencyAnalytics — simpler agency operations
• Swydo — paid-media focused
• NinjaCat — heavier agency infrastructure Pace Ads

Features I would not compromise on

For dozens of accounts, look for:

• Automated weekly/monthly reports
• White-label client dashboards
• Budget pacing alerts
• Cross-account views
• Change history (“what did we actually do?”)
• Role permissions for account managers
• Templates you can clone per client
• Anomaly alerts (spend spikes, conversion drops)
• API/data export options

A common mistake is buying only a reporting tool. Dashboards save reporting time, but they do not necessarily help your team find wasted spend or prioritize optimizations. Pair reporting with an optimization workflow. FanRuan Software

If you tell me:

1. number of clients/accounts,
2. platforms (Google only vs Meta/LinkedIn/TikTok too),
3. monthly ad spend range, and
4. whether you want AI automation or just reporting,

I can narrow this to a 2–3 tool stack.

For a small agency managing dozens of ad accounts, I’d look first at optmyzr.com if you want one system that handles both campaign optimization and reporting.

Why Optmyzr fits your use case

• Multi-account management: Its All Accounts Dashboard consolidates Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, LinkedIn and other ad accounts so you can monitor performance without jumping between platforms. Optmyzr Help Center Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization
• Optimization automation: You can build scheduled rules and strategies for things like bids, budgets, keywords and campaign issues, while retaining control over what gets automated. Optmyzr Help Center
• Portfolio-level monitoring: You can group accounts into portfolios and monitor KPIs, pacing, alerts and optimization opportunities across them. Optmyzr Help Center
• Agency reporting: You can build a report template once, reuse it across clients, white-label it, and schedule delivery. Multi-account reports can combine data from Google, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, LinkedIn and GA4. Optmyzr Help Center Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization
• Alerts/audits: It can automatically flag KPI anomalies, budget pacing issues and account optimization opportunities. Optmyzr Help Center

One important distinction

If your main pain is client reporting, rather than actually optimizing campaigns, I'd consider agencyanalytics.com instead. It's particularly focused on agency dashboards, white-label reporting, automated reports and pulling data from 85+ integrations. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics

So I'd frame the choice like this:

For your specific description, I'd start with Optmyzr. The combination of portfolio management, optimization automation, alerts and reusable multi-account reports is unusually aligned with an agency workflow. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization Optmyzr Help Center

If you tell me roughly how many accounts, monthly ad spend, and whether you're mostly Google Ads, Meta, or both, I can narrow this down to a practical agency stack and explain what I'd automate first.

If you’re managing multiple clients’ paid accounts—especially SaaS subscriptions, ad/marketing platforms, hosting, or other tools—I’d look for a system that separates client workspaces, centralizes billing, and gives your team per-client permissions.

Here are the strongest fits I found:

• verastly.com — Particularly relevant if you want a true agency model. It supports client subaccounts, consolidated billing through Stripe, per-client plans/add-ons, access controls, audit trails, and optional white-labeling. Verastly
• gestmi.com — More of an all-in-one agency operating system: client accounts, billing, invoices, CRM, projects, client access, and branded workspaces. It explicitly isolates what each client can see. Gestmi
• agencyanalytics.com — Strong if these are marketing clients and you also need reporting/dashboard access. It has client/staff permissions and centralized client management, with pricing based on the number of clients. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics
• delopay.net — Worth considering if by “paid accounts” you mean payment/merchant accounts rather than SaaS subscriptions. It is designed around isolated client accounts, scoped permissions, centralized payment administration, and audit logs. DeloPay
• billryt.com — More billing-focused: recurring invoices, receivables, client portals, and role-based access across clients. BillRyt

What I'd choose based on your setup

If your goal is essentially:

“Our agency pays for/manage accounts for 50+ clients, employees need controlled access to specific clients, and finance needs one place to manage billing.”

I'd narrow the evaluation to Verastly vs. Gestmi, with DeloPay if these are payment/merchant accounts.

If instead you mean Google Ads, Meta Ads, HubSpot, Shopify, SaaS subscriptions, etc., the answer changes substantially because many of those platforms already have their own agency/manager-account structures.

If you tell me what kinds of paid accounts you manage (e.g. SaaS subscriptions, ad accounts, hosting, AI tools, payment processors) and roughly how many clients, I can give you a much tighter 3–5-tool shortlist and explain the exact architecture I'd use.

For a resource-constrained agency managing multiple client ad accounts, the “best” platform is usually not the most powerful one — it’s the one that reduces repetitive work without creating a big operational burden. The right choice depends mostly on your ad channels (Google only vs. Google + Microsoft + Meta + Amazon), client count, and spend volume. MarqOps Keywordme

Here’s how I’d rank the options for a small-to-mid agency:

Keywordme digitalomnitech.com## My recommendation by agency size

1–10 client accounts, limited budget

Start with:

• Google Ads Manager Account (free)
• Google Ads Editor
• Google automated bidding strategies (Target CPA, Target ROAS, Maximize Conversions)
• Add a lightweight tool only where you have a bottleneck

This keeps software costs low while giving you bulk management. Keywordme

10–50 client accounts

I’d shortlist:

1. Optmyzr — best overall if bid rules, pacing, and repeatable optimization are the priority. Keywordme digitalomnitech.com
2. Adzooma — better if you need simplicity and faster onboarding. MarqOps

50+ accounts or multi-channel clients

Look at:

• Optmyzr
• Skai
• other enterprise PPC management suites

These make more sense when labor savings outweigh software cost. Keywordme

What I would avoid for a lean agency

• Buying an enterprise platform before you have a repeatable process
• Automating every bid change without approval rules
• Paying based on client ad spend if your margins are still tight

A practical stack for many small agencies is:

Google Ads Manager Account + Ads Editor → Optmyzr for automation → AgencyAnalytics/Looker Studio for client reporting

That gives you account control, bid automation, and client visibility without jumping straight into enterprise tooling. Keywordme

If you tell me:

1. number of client accounts,
2. channels (Google Ads only? Meta? Amazon?),
3. monthly managed spend, and
4. whether you want fully automated bidding or human-approved recommendations,

I can narrow this to the best 2–3 choices.

If the goal is “pull Google Ads + Meta Ads data into one client-facing dashboard”, I’d narrow it to three tools:

My recommendation

For an agency serving multiple clients: start with AgencyAnalytics.

It is designed specifically around client accounts, dashboards and automated reporting. It supports both Google Ads and Meta Ads, allows multiple accounts per integration, and has client-facing/white-label reporting functionality. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

The basic architecture would be:

Client Google Ads + Client Meta Ads → AgencyAnalytics → Client dashboard/report

That minimizes the amount of engineering and dashboard maintenance you have to do.

If you want a really custom dashboard

I'd choose Supermetrics + Looker Studio.

Supermetrics pulls Google Ads and Meta/Facebook Ads data into Looker Studio, where you can build your own branded dashboard and blend the channels. It also supports hundreds of other data sources. Supermetrics Supermetrics Supermetrics

supermetrics.com
lookerstudio.google.com

This is particularly good if you want dashboards like:

• Total ad spend
• Google vs. Meta spend
• Leads / purchases
• CPA
• ROAS
• Revenue
• Campaign-level performance
• Month-over-month trends
• Client-specific KPIs
• Custom branding

If you're building a larger data operation

Funnel is worth considering. It acts more like a marketing data layer: it can pull Google Ads and Meta data, transform/standardize it, and send it to destinations such as Looker Studio, Power BI, BigQuery, Snowflake, etc. Funnel Funnel Knowledge Base

funnel.io

So I'd think about it this way:

• “Give every client a nice dashboard quickly” → AgencyAnalytics
• “We want to design our own dashboards and control the data” → Supermetrics + Looker Studio
• “We're building a serious centralized marketing-data platform” → Funnel

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you want clients to log into their own branded portal, I can narrow this down to the most practical architecture and likely cost.

The basic architecture would be:

Client Google Ads + Client Meta Ads → AgencyAnalytics → Client dashboard/report

That minimizes the amount of engineering and dashboard maintenance you have to do.

If you want a really custom dashboard

I'd choose Supermetrics + Looker Studio.

Supermetrics pulls Google Ads and Meta/Facebook Ads data into Looker Studio, where you can build your own branded dashboard and blend the channels. It also supports hundreds of other data sources. supermetrics.com supermetrics.com supermetrics.com

If the goal is “pull Google Ads + Meta Ads into one dashboard that clients can log into/view”, I’d shortlist these:

My practical recommendation:

• 5–50+ clients: AgencyAnalytics is probably the most straightforward. It's built around agency/client reporting, rather than requiring you to build the whole reporting system yourself. Current 2026 comparisons specifically highlight its multi-client and white-label workflow. databox.com
• Clients care heavily about polished reports/presentations: look at Whatagraph. www.basedash.com
• You want a highly customized dashboard and have someone technical maintaining it: Data Studio/Looker Studio + Supermetrics gives you substantially more control. Supermetrics is the data connector; the dashboard itself is built in Data Studio/Looker Studio. supermetrics.comwww.groovemedia.io
• You want a live “how are we doing?” KPI screen: Databox is worth considering. databox.com

One important distinction: don't choose Supermetrics thinking it's the dashboard. It's primarily the data-pipeline/connector layer. You'd typically pair it with Data Studio/Looker Studio, Sheets, BigQuery, etc. supermetrics.comwww.groovemedia.io

If I were building this for an agency

I'd probably choose:

Meta Ads + Google Ads → Supermetrics → Data Studio/Looker Studio

if you want maximum control and a custom branded dashboard, or:

Meta Ads + Google Ads → AgencyAnalytics

if you want something operational that you can roll out to lots of clients quickly.

Google's own documentation describes Data Studio as a customizable reporting/dashboard product with 1,000+ possible data sources, while current release notes show Meta Ads partner connectors are available. docs.cloud.google.com

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether clients need a login/white-label portal vs just a dashboard link, I can narrow it down to the best 1–2 options and compare the likely monthly cost.

For an agency managing many client ad accounts, the usual tools are agency management platforms or the native business manager/admin tools from the ad platforms.

Common options:

• Meta Business Manager — Used by agencies to manage multiple Meta (Facebook/Instagram) ad accounts, assign people, set roles (admin, advertiser, analyst, etc.), and control access to specific client assets. LinkedIn Business Solutions
• Google Ads Manager Account (MCC) — Lets agencies manage multiple Google Ads client accounts from one login, with user access controls and account-level permissions.
• AgencyAnalytics — Useful when the goal is giving clients and internal staff controlled access to dashboards, reports, and connected marketing data. AgencyAnalytics
• NinjaCat — Provides agency user roles and lets agencies control which client accounts different users can access. NinjaCat Docs
• AgencyAccess — Focuses on collecting and managing client permissions/access during onboarding across ad and analytics platforms. AgencyAccess
• Leadsie — Helps agencies request and manage client access without sharing passwords. Leadsie

If you mean “one central tool where an agency owner can add employees, clients, roles, and permissions across hundreds of ad accounts”, look for an agency operations platform with RBAC (role-based access control). Examples include tools like AgencyAnalytics, NinjaCat, or specialized ad-management platforms. AgencyAnalytics NinjaCat Docs

If you mean specifically Meta ads, Google Ads, TikTok ads, or all platforms together, the best answer changes.

For an agency managing many client ad accounts, the tool you’re looking for is usually an agency management platform with role-based access control (RBAC) or the ad platforms’ own manager accounts/business managers.

Common options:

• Google Ads Manager Account (formerly MCC) — lets agencies manage multiple Google Ads accounts from one dashboard and assign users with different access levels. Good for controlling who can manage which client accounts.
• Meta Business Manager — lets agencies manage multiple ad accounts, Pages, pixels, and other assets with roles such as admin, employee, and partner access. LinkedIn
• Microsoft Advertising Manager Accounts — supports agency account hierarchies and user roles across multiple advertiser accounts. Microsoft Learn
• AgencyAnalytics — useful when the goal is giving staff and clients controlled access to dashboards, reports, and connected marketing data rather than directly managing ad platforms. It supports staff/client users and granular permissions. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics Knowledge Base
• AgencyAccess — focused on collecting and organizing client access requests across platforms, using guided onboarding flows instead of exchanging passwords. AgencyAccess

If you mean “one place where an agency owner can add employees, assign them only certain client ad accounts, and control permissions at scale,” look for:

• agency/team management
• RBAC (role-based access control)
• client/account-level permissions
• audit logs
• partner access management

For running campaigns, use the ad platforms’ manager tools (Google Ads Manager, Meta Business Manager, etc.). For organizing people and permissions across many platforms, an agency operations platform may fit better. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics Knowledge Base

If you're an agency managing multiple Google/Meta ad accounts and billing clients based on actual ad spend, I’d separate the problem into spend aggregation, invoice generation, and payment collection rather than expecting one tool to do everything.

My shortlist

What I'd use

For a typical performance/paid-media agency, I'd lean toward:

Google Ads + Meta → spend aggregation → accounting/invoicing system → Stripe

with AgencyAnalytics sitting on top for client reporting.

AgencyAnalytics is particularly useful because it supports multiple accounts per client and can apply client-specific or account-wide PPC spend markups. It also has roll-up reporting across Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Microsoft Ads, TikTok and other platforms. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics Knowledge Base AgencyAnalytics Knowledge Base

However, AgencyAnalytics isn't really your accounting/invoicing engine. I'd treat its spend/markup calculation as the reporting layer, then have your accounting/payment system create the actual invoice.

If you want it almost completely hands-off

A good architecture is:

Ad platforms
→ Google Ads / Meta / Microsoft / TikTok
→ Spend data
→ client/account mapping
→ billing rules
→ ad spend + agency fee/markup + retainer + taxes
→ invoice
→ Stripe payment link/autopay
→ accounting system

For example, a client could have:

• Google Ads spend: $18,420.37
• Meta spend: $7,841.22
• Ad-spend markup: 12%
• Management fee: $2,500
• Total invoice: automatically calculated
• Stripe: automatically sends/collects payment
• Accounting: automatically records the transaction

One interesting specialized option

Spend to Invoice is worth looking at if your operation is heavily Google Ads-focused. It specifically pulls closed-month Google Ads Manager-account billing data, applies per-client fee rules, and produces invoice lines. Its limitation is important: it currently doesn't support Meta or accounting-system sync. Spend to Invoice

HighLevel is more interesting if you're already using it as your agency operating system. Its rebilling functionality can charge subaccounts for supported usage and, on its Agency Pro tier, apply markups. HighLevel Support Portal HighLevel Support Portal

If you're asking because you want to build the "ideal" system

I'd actually consider Stripe + a small billing automation layer + Google/Meta APIs + Xero/QuickBooks rather than trying to force an agency CRM to be your accounting system.

Google's Ads API itself exposes billing setups, account budgets, and invoice data, so there is enough API infrastructure to automate reconciliation at scale. Google for Developers

If you tell me (1) number of clients, (2) Google vs Meta vs both, (3) whether clients pay the ad platforms directly or you pay them, and (4) whether you charge % of spend, flat fee, or both, I can recommend a specific stack and map out the exact automation.

A good architecture is:

Ad platforms
→ Google Ads / Meta / Microsoft / TikTok
→ Spend data
→ client/account mapping
→ billing rules
→ ad spend + agency fee/markup + retainer + taxes
→ invoice
→ Stripe payment link/autopay
→ accounting system

For example, a client could have:

• Google Ads spend: $18,420.37
• Meta spend: $7,841.22
• Ad-spend markup: 12%
• Management fee: $2,500
• Total invoice: automatically calculated
• Stripe: automatically sends/collects payment
• Accounting: automatically records the transaction

One interesting specialized option

Spend to Invoice is worth looking at if your operation is heavily Google Ads-focused. It specifically pulls closed-month Google Ads Manager-account billing data, applies per-client fee rules, and produces invoice lines. Its limitation is important: it currently doesn't support Meta or accounting-system sync.

If you're a marketing/performance agency billing clients for both management fees and actual ad spend across multiple Google/Meta/TikTok accounts, I’d avoid trying to make a generic invoicing app do everything.

The setup I’d look at

1. Xero + an ad-spend connector/automation layer — best flexible architecture

Xero can be the accounting source of truth, while a connector pulls spend by client/account and feeds the appropriate billing data into your invoicing workflow. This is particularly useful if you have lots of client accounts and want the ability to customize the automation. Industry guidance specifically points to Xero's integration ecosystem as useful for PPC-agency workflows. Sidekick Accounting Sidekick Accounting

Typical flow:

Google/Meta/TikTok accounts → spend data → client/account mapping → calculate fee/markup → Xero invoice → Stripe/payment → reconciliation

I'd choose this if automation and scalability matter more than having everything in one UI.

2. Verbial — closest match to your exact use case

verbial.io is specifically designed around paid-media agencies. It supports pass-through media billing, percentage-of-spend fees, separating media spend from agency revenue, and invoicing based on actual spend. Verbial

That makes it unusually close to:

Client spent $47,382 → agency fee = 12% → automatically produce the appropriate invoice/statement.

It also addresses the accounting distinction between client money flowing through you and actual agency revenue, which becomes important as spend grows.

3. AgencyAnalytics — excellent companion for client reporting, not my first choice as the billing ledger

agencyanalytics.com can consolidate PPC data across clients and supports per-client PPC markups in reporting. AgencyAnalytics G2

I'd use it if you want the client to see:

• Google Ads spend
• Meta spend
• TikTok spend
• total media spend
• your markup/fee
• campaign performance

…but I'd pair it with proper accounting/billing rather than make it the financial system of record.

What I'd pick based on your situation

Agiled, for example, explicitly supports recurring retainers, project billing and ad-spend/tooling pass-through on client invoices. Agiled

One important distinction

I'd first decide who actually pays the ad platform.

If your agency's card/bank account pays Google/Meta, you need a system that can:

1. identify spend by client/ad account,
2. reconcile the platform charge,
3. calculate your management fee/markup,
4. generate the client invoice,
5. distinguish pass-through spend from agency revenue,
6. reconcile the eventual client payment.

If the client pays Google/Meta directly, the problem is much simpler: you primarily need to calculate your management fee from verified spend and invoice that amount.

If you tell me (a) number of clients, (b) Google/Meta/TikTok platforms, (c) whether you front the ad spend, and (d) whether your fee is % of spend, fixed, or both, I can map out the exact automation stack I'd use—including what should trigger the invoice and where each piece of data should live.

I'd first decide who actually pays the ad platform.

verbial.io is specifically designed around paid-media agencies. It supports pass-through media billing, percentage-of-spend fees, separating media spend from agency revenue, and invoicing based on actual spend. verbial.io

That makes it unusually close to:

Client spent $47,382 → agency fee = 12% → automatically produce the appropriate invoice/statement.

It also addresses the accounting distinction between client money flowing through you and actual agency revenue, which becomes important as spend grows.

3. AgencyAnalytics — excellent companion for client reporting, not my first choice as the billing ledger

For an agency scaling both paid search and paid social across many client accounts, I’d look first at Optmyzr.

Why Optmyzr stands out for your use case

Optmyzr currently has automatic anomaly alerts across connected Google Ads, Microsoft Ads, and Facebook/Meta Ads accounts, with detection around metrics such as cost, impressions, and clicks. Optmyzr Help Center Optmyzr Help Center

More importantly for an agency, its Portfolio and All Accounts views let you group accounts by client and monitor them centrally. The current dashboard surfaces anomaly alerts, custom alerts, budget pacing, account health, and other signals across accounts. Optmyzr Help Center Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization

For social specifically, Optmyzr supports Meta and LinkedIn, including real-time monitoring and alerts for performance changes/anomalies. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization

It also supports sending anomaly notifications into Slack and Microsoft Teams, which matters if you're trying to operationalize alerts rather than have account managers constantly check dashboards. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization Optmyzr Help Center

Where AgencyAnalytics differs

AgencyAnalytics is particularly oriented toward client reporting and dashboards. Its anomaly detection flags positive and negative deviations in client metrics, while KPI alerts can be configured across clients. It also has 85+ integrations and client-specific dashboards/permissions. AgencyAnalytics

So the distinction I'd make is:

• Optmyzr: better fit if the alerting system is part of your paid-media operations/optimization layer.
• AgencyAnalytics: better fit if the primary requirement is client reporting + dashboards + monitoring.
• Whatagraph: worth evaluating if you primarily want a cross-channel reporting/monitoring layer rather than deep PPC operations.

For an agency where the requirement is specifically "tell my team when something unusual happens across 50/100/500 client ad accounts, without everyone manually checking platforms," Optmyzr is the most directly aligned of these options based on the current feature sets. Optmyzr Help Center Optmyzr Help Center

If you tell me roughly how many client accounts you manage and whether the mix is Google + Meta only or also Microsoft/LinkedIn/TikTok, I can narrow this down further, including alert granularity, Slack routing, false-positive handling, and pricing model.

For social specifically, Optmyzr supports Meta and LinkedIn, including real-time monitoring and alerts for performance changes/anomalies. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization

It also supports sending anomaly notifications into Slack and Microsoft Teams, which matters if you're trying to operationalize alerts rather than have account managers constantly check dashboards. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization Optmyzr Help Center

Where AgencyAnalytics differs

AgencyAnalytics is particularly oriented toward client reporting and dashboards. Its anomaly detection flags positive and negative deviations in client metrics, while KPI alerts can be configured across clients. It also has 85+ integrations and client-specific dashboards/permissions.

If you mean one interface where an agency can manage Google Search + Meta/Facebook/Instagram campaigns across dozens of client accounts, there are two different approaches:

My shortlist

For Google specifically, Google's own Manager Account (MCC) is designed exactly for agencies managing many client accounts: one login, cross-account reporting, campaign management, permissions, and account hierarchy. Google Help Google Help

What I'd consider for your use case

If you're managing dozens of clients, I'd probably build the stack around:

Google Ads MCC + Meta Business Manager + an agency operating layer such as Optmyzr/Skai + AgencyAnalytics for client reporting.

That's slightly different from looking for a single "all-in-one" tool. The native ad platforms remain the systems of record, while the agency software gives you cross-client automation, monitoring and reporting.

If you specifically want one screen where your media buyers can actually create/edit/launch both Google and Meta campaigns across 30–100+ client accounts, tell me roughly how many accounts, monthly ad spend, and whether you need TikTok too. I can narrow this to 2–3 platforms and compare their current pricing/features.

If you mean one agency interface where you can manage dozens of clients across Google Search + Meta/Facebook/Instagram, rather than merely produce reports, I’d separate the options into two categories.

My shortlist

• agencyanalytics.com — strongest if you want a multi-client agency hub + reporting. It supports multiple Google Ads and Meta Ads accounts, client/staff permissions, dashboards, automated reports, and an agency-wide roll-up view. It also integrates with 85+ marketing platforms. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics Knowledge Base AgencyAnalytics Knowledge Base AgencyAnalytics Knowledge Base
• clientplug.io — worth looking at if you specifically want Google Ads + Meta Ads + client management/billing in one operational dashboard. It provides agency-wide and per-client views rather than just reporting. ClientPlug
• alpomi.com — interesting for agencies managing 10–100+ accounts, particularly if your main problem is seeing Google, Meta, TikTok, etc. across the entire client portfolio. Alpomi
• adhorde.com — more focused on actually operating Meta campaigns at scale, with bulk launches, templates and automation across client accounts. Its current positioning is particularly Meta-centric rather than a complete Google + Meta agency operating system. AdHorde

One important distinction

If by "run campaigns" you mean actually create/edit/pause/bulk-launch campaigns, rather than simply monitor and report on them, I'd be careful with AgencyAnalytics. Its strength is the centralized agency/client layer and reporting, while Google's own Manager Account is the native way to manage multiple Google Ads accounts from one interface. Google explicitly supports creating/managing campaigns and comparing multiple client accounts through a Manager Account (MCC). Google Help

So for a serious agency with dozens of accounts, I'd consider this architecture:

Google Ads MCC + Meta Business Manager → campaign-management tools → AgencyAnalytics/ClientPlug for the unified agency layer and reporting.

If your goal is specifically "I want my team to launch, edit, optimize and report on Google + Meta campaigns for 30–100 clients without constantly jumping between Ads Managers", tell me roughly how many clients/accounts you have and whether you need billing, CRM, approvals, AI automation, or white-label client portals. I can narrow this to 2–3 platforms and compare their current pricing/features.