Neutral mentions of Optmyzr
5 answers this week mention Optmyzr in a neutral tone. Topic: Google Ads audits. Week of 24th to 30th Aug 2026.
"which ad auditing tool is good for analyzing wasted spend from broad match and smart bidding combos"
For finding wasted spend specifically from the broad match + Smart Bidding combination, I’d prioritize tools that can inspect:
- Search term waste (irrelevant queries triggered by broad match)
- Conversion signal quality (what Smart Bidding is optimizing toward)
- Spend by query/theme, not just campaign-level ROAS
- Negative keyword gaps
- Bid strategy health (tCPA/tROAS learning issues, low-quality conversion volume)
My shortlist:
| Tool | Best for | Why it fits broad match + Smart Bidding audits |
|---|---|---|
| Optmyzr | Larger PPC teams/agencies | Strong rules, scripts, and optimization workflows. Good for finding search-term leakage, budget inefficiencies, and automating negative keyword workflows. Conner Crowe |
| Adalysis | Search-heavy accounts | Good audit depth around account structure, ads, and search performance issues; useful when broad match is part of a bigger account-quality problem. Not Fair |
| TrueClicks | Ongoing monitoring | Better if you want recurring alerts rather than a one-time audit. Not Fair |
| COREPPC | Fast diagnostic audits | Focuses on automated checks including keyword/match type review, bidding assessment, and budget analysis. CorePPC |
| AdSentry | SMB/mid-market accounts | Built around identifying dollar-impact issues, including match types, negative keywords, and bidding inputs. AdSentry |
| CampaignRx | Quick AI diagnosis | Looks for broad-match waste, targeting problems, and tracking issues across ad accounts. CampaignRx |
My picks by scenario
- $10k–$100k/month Google Ads spend:
Start with Optmyzr + a human review of Search Terms. Automated tools are good at surfacing anomalies, but the decision to keep broad match usually depends on business intent and conversion quality. Conner Crowe
- Agency managing many accounts:
Optmyzr or TrueClicks are better because you need repeatable audits and alerts across accounts. Not Fair
- Need a quick “where is money leaking?” report:
COREPPC, AdSentry, or CampaignRx are closer to that use case. CorePPC AdSentry CampaignRx
The audit checks I’d insist on
Regardless of tool, I’d want the output to answer:
- What percentage of spend came from broad-match queries with no conversions?
- Which search terms spent money but failed CPA/ROAS targets?
- Are conversions being optimized toward real business outcomes or low-value events?
- Is Smart Bidding learning from enough clean conversion volume?
- Are negative keywords preventing repeat waste?
A lot of “broad match is bad” diagnoses are actually conversion tracking + Smart Bidding signal problems. Broad match can work when Google has strong conversion data; it tends to struggle when the algorithm is optimizing toward noisy or sparse signals. Google Reddit
If you tell me your monthly spend, lead gen vs ecommerce, and whether you use tCPA or tROAS, I can narrow this to the 2–3 tools most likely to find real waste.
Behind this answer: no web searches, 3 tracked brands mentioned
ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.
Tracked brands mentioned
"is there a platform that analyzes bidding strategies and flags where automated bids are wasting budget"
Yes. If you mean “analyze what the bidding automation is actually doing, identify where it’s spending inefficiently, and flag specific budget-waste opportunities”, there are platforms for this.
Best fit: Optmyzr
optmyzr.com is probably the closest match to what you're describing.
It can sit on top of Google Ads/Microsoft Ads and:
- Analyze automated bidding such as Target CPA, Target ROAS, and Maximize Conversions. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization
- Find non-converting search queries, keywords, placements, and PMax listing groups that are consuming spend. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization
- Detect performance anomalies rather than simply notifying you whenever a metric changes. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization
- Analyze why performance changed using its PPC Investigator/cause analysis. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization
- Project spend and identify campaigns where additional budget is unlikely to generate additional volume. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization Optmyzr Help Center
- Layer rules/automation over Google's Smart Bidding rather than replacing it outright. Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization Optmyzr Google Ads Optimization
That's materially different from Google's own recommendations. Google Smart Bidding operates at auction time and considers contextual signals such as query, device, browser, language and time of day; Google's native recommendations can suggest changes to bidding targets, but they aren't really designed as an independent “is the bidding algorithm wasting money?” auditor. Google Google Help
The interesting gap
If you're asking because you're considering building something, I think there's a potentially interesting product distinction:
“Bid strategy auditor” rather than “bid optimizer.”
For example, instead of automatically changing bids, the platform could produce findings like:
- $18.4K spent with no incremental conversion signal
- Target CPA strategy is systematically overbidding on this query cluster
- 23% of spend is going to segments with CPA >2× account target
- PMax is allocating disproportionately to low-value traffic
- Campaign has budget headroom, but increasing budget is unlikely to produce incremental conversions
- Automated bid changes increased CPC 31% without corresponding conversion-rate improvement
- This campaign's apparent ROAS improvement is coming from conversion mix rather than incremental revenue
- These 14 campaigns are competing for essentially the same auction inventory
That last layer—attribution of waste specifically to the behavior of the automated bidding system—is less common than generic PPC optimization.
If that's what you're exploring, I can also map out the existing competitors in this exact niche and where there is still a product gap.
Behind this answer: no web searches, 1 tracked brand mentioned
ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.
Tracked brands mentioned
"which tool will identify wasted spend from inactive or outdated ad extensions and assets"
If you mean a tool that can find wasted spend caused by inactive, stale, or outdated ad extensions and assets, you’re usually looking for a Google Ads audit/optimization tool rather than a general analytics tool.
Common options include:
- Google Ads Recommendations & Asset Reports — built into Google Ads. It can surface underperforming assets, removed/paused items, and asset-level performance issues.
- Google Ads Editor — useful for bulk auditing extensions/assets, finding old campaigns, and cleaning up inactive items.
- PPC audit tools such as Optmyzr or Adalysis — these can flag account hygiene issues, underperforming ads/assets, and optimization opportunities.
- AI audit tools such as AdLark or similar Google Ads auditors can scan accounts for wasted spend patterns and budget leaks. AdLark App
If you specifically mean inactive/outdated ad extensions and assets, look for audit features that check:
- unused sitelinks, callouts, snippets, images, and videos
- assets with spend but no conversions
- old promotions or expired offers
- low-performing responsive search ad assets
- duplicate or conflicting extensions
- assets attached to paused/dead campaigns
For an enterprise PPC workflow, the closest fit is typically a Google Ads account audit tool + asset performance report, rather than a standalone “wasted spend” detector. adpredictor.ai app.adlyse.com
Behind this answer: no web searches, 2 tracked brands mentioned
ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.
Tracked brands mentioned
"is there a tool that can compare ad creative performance and tell me which ads are wasting budget on poor CTR or quality score"
Yes. There are tools that can do this, but they fall into a few different categories. The best choice depends on whether you mean paid social creative analysis (Meta/TikTok/etc.) or search ads quality/CTR optimization (Google Ads Quality Score).
Tools that analyze creative performance and budget waste
| Tool | Best for | What it can tell you |
|---|---|---|
| Motion | Meta/TikTok creative analytics | Which ads are driving spend but poor CPA/CTR, creative fatigue, winners vs losers |
| Madgicx | Meta Ads automation | Finds underperforming ads, reallocates budget, flags creative fatigue |
| Adalysis | Google Ads/Microsoft Ads | Quality Score analysis, wasted spend, poor CTR keywords/ads, testing insights |
| Optmyzr | Google Ads agencies | Automated audits, wasted spend detection, ad testing, optimization recommendations |
| Segwise | Cross-channel creative intelligence | Connects creative elements (hooks, visuals, formats) with performance metrics and suggests iterations |
If your main question is:
"Which ads are eating budget but not producing results?"
Look for a creative intelligence / media optimization tool. It should connect to your ad accounts and rank ads by:
- Spend
- CTR
- CPM
- CPC
- CPA/CPL
- ROAS
- Conversion rate
- Frequency (creative fatigue)
- Placement performance
- Audience breakdown
Tools like Motion, Madgicx, and Segwise are aimed more at this use case. Hawky Segwise
If your issue is Google Ads Quality Score
You want PPC auditing tools rather than creative AI tools. They look at:
- Low Quality Score keywords
- Below-average expected CTR
- Poor ad relevance
- Landing page experience
- Search terms wasting spend
Adalysis and Optmyzr are examples built around this workflow. AdToolScout Dupple
AI creative scoring tools (useful but different)
Some tools score creatives before launch, predicting which designs/hooks may perform better. For example, AdCreative.ai assigns creative performance scores, and similar tools use historical ad data or attention models. These are useful for filtering ideas, but they generally cannot replace real spend data from your own campaigns. Official A.I Ranking Multilinear
A practical setup many performance teams use
- Pull live ad data from Meta/Google/TikTok.
- Identify ads with: - high spend + below-account-average CTR
- high CPC
- high CPA
- declining conversion rate
- Tag creative attributes: - hook
- offer
- format
- first 3 seconds (video)
- CTA
- Kill losers and generate new variants from winners.
If you tell me which platform you’re running (Meta, Google Search, TikTok, LinkedIn, Amazon) and roughly your monthly ad spend, I can narrow this down to the tools that are actually worth paying for.
Behind this answer: no web searches, 3 tracked brands mentioned
ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.
Tracked brands mentioned
"is there software to automatically audit shopping campaigns and find wasted spend on non-converting product queries"
Yes. This has become a fairly active category, especially for Google Shopping and Performance Max accounts. There are three levels of sophistication:
1. Purpose-built Shopping audit tools (best for finding wasted spend)
These connect to Google Ads and Merchant Center with read-only access and specifically look for:
- Search queries with spend but no conversions
- Products ("vampire SKUs") that consume budget without sales
- Missing negative keyword opportunities
- Feed issues that cause poor query matching
- Budget concentration on low-ROAS products
Examples include:
- AdTool (myWebHero) – focuses heavily on Shopping accounts and reports non-converting search terms, wasted spend by product, feed health, and Merchant Center issues. MyWebHero
- AdTunez – identifies zero-conversion keywords, product budget dominance, and high-converting search terms that should be promoted. Adtunez Softtrix
- AdSentry – AI-powered audits with estimated dollar value of wasted spend and negative keyword recommendations. AdSentry
2. PPC optimization platforms
These continuously monitor accounts rather than performing one-off audits.
Examples:
- Optmyzr
- Karooya
- Opteo
- TrueClicks
- Campaign Owl
These generally provide:
- recurring search term reviews
- automated alerts
- negative keyword suggestions
- account health scoring
- optimization workflows
Campaign Owl, for example, includes AI search term classification and estimates the financial impact of issues. Campaign Owl
3. AI-powered assistants
A newer category is AI agents that:
- classify every search term by intent
- estimate wasted spend
- suggest negatives
- sometimes even prepare changes for approval
Examples include:
- BidSense BidSense
- Cloudginny Cloudginny
- Dina Dina
These are closer to "AI PPC analysts" than traditional dashboards.
What I'd actually want from a tool
If I were choosing one today, I'd expect it to answer questions like:
| Question | Useful? |
|---|---|
| Which search terms spent >$100 with 0 conversions? | ✅ |
| Which products have spent >2× target CPA without a sale? | ✅ |
| Which queries should become negatives? | ✅ |
| Which queries should become Search keywords? | ✅ |
| Which products have poor titles causing irrelevant matches? | ✅ |
| Which feed attributes are hurting Shopping relevance? | ✅ |
| Which PMax asset groups are leaking budget? | ✅ |
| How much money could I save by applying these fixes? | ✅ |
Simply flagging "low CTR" or "low ROAS" is much less actionable.
If you're thinking about building one
There's still room for a differentiated product because most current tools are rule-based. A stronger AI system could:
- understand semantic relevance instead of relying only on conversions
- identify patterns across thousands of search queries
- cluster irrelevant searches automatically
- estimate confidence before recommending negatives
- explain why a query is a poor fit
- generate Google Ads Editor bulk uploads
- prioritize fixes by expected ROI rather than by spend alone
That moves beyond an audit into a decision-support tool.
If you're considering this as a SaaS, I think there's demand—particularly among agencies and Shopify merchants spending $5k–$100k/month on Shopping campaigns—provided it saves significant manual review time and produces recommendations users trust.
Behind this answer: no web searches, 3 tracked brands mentioned
ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.
