This is a live demo of the answers Hootsuite would see. Hootsuite is not a customer and has not endorsed this demo; the answers are real, from ChatGPT, collected daily (methodology). See your own brand's answers

Answers that do not mention Hootsuite

64 of 79 answers this week do not mention Hootsuite. Topic: Social media analytics. Week of 14th to 20th Sep 2026. Showing 61 to 64 of 64, newest first.

"what should i use to get cross-platform analytics and aggregated benchmarks for instagram, tiktok, linkedin and x?"

Answer 1 of 1, 14th Sep 2026, unknown, does not mention you

chatgpt.com
what should i use to get cross-platform analytics and aggregated benchmarks for instagram, tiktok, linkedin and x?

If your priority is one dashboard across Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, and X + meaningful benchmarks against other brands, I’d narrow it to Emplifi, Rival IQ, and Sprout Social.

My ranking
ToolCross-platform analyticsCompetitive benchmarksIndustry benchmarksBest for
emplifi.io⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Best overall for your use case
rivaliq.com⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Best for competitor benchmarking
sproutsocial.com⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Best all-in-one social platform
socialinsider.io⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Good analytics/value option
1. Emplifi — probably what I'd choose

Emplifi is particularly well matched to what you're describing because it explicitly standardizes metrics across Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, X and other networks into a comparable dataset. Emplifi

More importantly, its benchmark dataset is genuinely large: its 2026 benchmark report says it analyzed data from 200,000+ brand accounts, with analysis spanning the major social platforms. Emplifi

So you can answer questions like:

"Our Instagram engagement rate is 1.8%. Is that actually good?"

rather than just:

"Our Instagram engagement rate increased 20%."

That's a major distinction.

Its 2026 benchmarks also include things like follower growth, engagement, content formats and paid performance. Emplifi

I'd pick Emplifi if the benchmark/analytics layer is the main reason you're buying software.

2. Rival IQ — best if "how do we compare to competitors?" is the question

rivaliq.com is excellent if you want to build a competitive set and continuously monitor it.

It covers Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, Facebook and YouTube, and is specifically designed around competitive social analytics rather than primarily being a publishing/community-management platform. Sprout's current comparison of tools also identifies Rival IQ as the dedicated competitive-benchmarking option. Sprout Social

I'd choose Rival IQ if you want dashboards like:

  • Us vs. 10 competitors
  • Engagement rate by platform
  • Posting frequency
  • Follower growth
  • Best-performing content
  • Content-type performance
  • Competitor outliers
  • Historical competitive trends

If you're an agency or strategy team, I'd seriously consider this one.

3. Sprout Social — best if you also need the operating system

sproutsocial.com is the better choice if analytics are only one part of the requirement.

It can aggregate Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn and X into cross-network reports, while also giving you publishing, inbox/community management, listening, workflow, etc. Sprout Social Support Sprout Social

Its Cross-Network Profile Performance report is particularly useful for getting a unified view of metrics across networks. Sprout Social

The caveat: I'd choose Sprout for the overall social-management platform, not because it has the deepest benchmark dataset.

The distinction I'd make

There are actually three different things you might mean by "benchmarks":

  1. Your own cross-platform benchmark

"How did our Instagram compare with our TikTok?"

  1. Competitive benchmark

"How does Nike/our competitors compare with us?"

  1. Market/industry benchmark

"Is a 2% engagement rate good for a B2B SaaS company?"

For your wording—"cross-platform analytics and aggregated benchmarks"—I'd prioritize #1 + #3, which pushes me toward Emplifi.

If you mean #2, I'd lean Rival IQ.

One important caveat

Don't simply compare raw engagement rates between platforms. A 5% TikTok engagement rate and a 2% LinkedIn engagement rate don't necessarily mean TikTok is "performing better." The platforms calculate and expose metrics differently. Sprout itself notes that organic/paid availability and metric definitions vary by network. Sprout Social Support

The better system is to normalize each platform against its own benchmark distribution, e.g.:

Instagram: 82nd percentile
TikTok: 61st percentile
LinkedIn: 91st percentile
X: 48th percentile

Then you can actually make a cross-platform strategic decision.

My short answer:

  • Want the strongest benchmark/analytics layer → Emplifi
  • Want competitive intelligence → Rival IQ
  • Want analytics + publishing + inbox + listening → Sprout Social
  • Want a potentially cheaper analytics-focused option → Socialinsider

If you tell me whether you're a brand, agency, creator, or investor/research team—and roughly how many accounts you need to track—I can narrow this to the best 2 and compare their pricing, API/data access, historical data, and benchmark methodology.

Don't simply compare raw engagement rates between platforms. A 5% TikTok engagement rate and a 2% LinkedIn engagement rate don't necessarily mean TikTok is "performing better." The platforms calculate and expose metrics differently. Sprout itself notes that organic/paid availability and metric definitions vary by network.

The better system is to normalize each platform against its own benchmark distribution, e.g.:

Instagram: 82nd percentile
TikTok: 61st percentile
LinkedIn: 91st percentile
X: 48th percentile

Then you can actually make a cross-platform strategic decision.

My short answer:

That's a major distinction.

Its 2026 benchmarks also include things like follower growth, engagement, content formats and paid performance. Emplifi

I'd pick Emplifi if the benchmark/analytics layer is the main reason you're buying software.

2. Rival IQ — best if "how do we compare to competitors?" is the question

rivaliq.com is excellent if you want to build a competitive set and continuously monitor it.

It covers Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, Facebook and YouTube, and is specifically designed around competitive social analytics rather than primarily being a publishing/community-management platform. Sprout's current comparison of tools also identifies Rival IQ as the dedicated competitive-benchmarking option.

I'd choose Rival IQ if you want dashboards like:

Behind this answer: no web searches, 2 tracked brands mentioned

ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.

Tracked brands mentioned

Emplifi Sprout Social

"as a content agency handling dozens of brands, which platform gives consolidated cross-network performance dashboards and client-ready benchmark reports?"

Answer 1 of 1, 14th Sep 2026, unknown, does not mention you

chatgpt.com
as a content agency handling dozens of brands, which platform gives consolidated cross-network performance dashboards and client-ready benchmark reports?

For a content agency managing dozens of brands, I’d shortlist these three:

PlatformBest fitCross-network dashboardsClient-ready reportsBenchmarking
AgencyAnalyticsBest overall for agenciesExcellentExcellent, white-labelExcellent
Sprout SocialBest for deep social analyticsExcellentExcellentExcellent
DashThisBest for flexible reporting/white-labelingExcellentExcellentGood
🥇 My pick: AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com is probably the closest match to your exact use case. It supports 85+ integrations, combines paid, social, search and web data, and has agency-oriented dashboards and automated client reports. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics

The particularly relevant feature is Roll-up Reporting: you can aggregate performance across multiple brands/clients, compare them side-by-side, and create agency-wide views. Its Benchmarking feature can also compare a client's metrics against industry medians and quartiles. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics

That makes it stronger than a pure social analytics tool if you're trying to answer questions like:

“How is Brand A performing versus our other clients and versus its industry?”

When I'd choose Sprout instead

sproutsocial.com is the better choice if your agency is primarily social/content-focused and wants deeper native social analytics. It offers cross-network, competitive, paid and network-specific reports across platforms including Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube and others. Sprout Social

Its competitive reports are particularly useful for showing clients how their social performance compares with competitors. Sprout Social

When I'd choose DashThis

dashthis.com is compelling if presentation and white-label reporting are the priority. It combines data from Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube, GA4, ads platforms and more into customizable dashboards, with white-label branding and automated report delivery. DashThis DashThis

Bottom line: For a multi-brand content agency, I'd start with AgencyAnalytics. If your clients care much more about sophisticated social/content analysis than broader marketing reporting, I'd put Sprout Social first.

Behind this answer: no web searches, 1 tracked brand mentioned

ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.

Tracked brands mentioned

Sprout Social

"we manage creator networks and need cross-platform analytics plus benchmarks for reach and engagement, what should we use?"

Answer 1 of 1, 14th Sep 2026, unknown, does not mention you

chatgpt.com
we manage creator networks and need cross-platform analytics plus benchmarks for reach and engagement, what should we use?

If you manage creator networks rather than a single brand account, I’d use a two-layer stack: one system for your roster/campaign analytics, plus an independent benchmark dataset so you’re not benchmarking your creators against arbitrary averages.

My shortlist

NeedBest fitWhy
Enterprise creator-network management + cross-platform campaign analyticsCreatorIQStrongest fit if you're managing lots of creators, campaigns, clients, and platforms
Creator discovery + audience quality + benchmarksHypeAuditorParticularly useful for evaluating creator quality, authenticity, audience and competitive benchmarks
Creator discovery + campaign management + analyticsGRINGood if your workflow includes relationships, seeding, campaigns and reporting
Fast, flexible creator research/benchmarkingModashUseful for roster analysis and creator-level audience/performance research
Independent benchmark dataClick Analytic / CreatorDBGood complements for establishing external market baselines

CreatorIQ is especially worth considering for your use case: its latest industry research says organizations are using about five social platforms on average, with Instagram, YouTube, Facebook and TikTok all heavily represented. CreatorIQ

What I'd actually build

1. CreatorIQ as the operational layer

Use it for:

  • Unified creator profiles
  • Campaign-level reach, impressions, engagement and content performance
  • Cross-platform reporting
  • Creator roster management
  • Client reporting
  • Historical campaign comparisons

2. HypeAuditor or Modash as the intelligence layer

Use this to answer questions like:

  • Is this creator's audience actually good?
  • How does this creator compare with other creators in their tier?
  • Is their engagement unusually high/low?
  • Are they growing?
  • How does their performance compare within beauty/gaming/fitness/etc.?

3. Build your own network benchmarks

This is the part I wouldn't outsource entirely.

Create benchmarks segmented by:

Platform × Format × Follower tier × Vertical × Geography × Content type

For example:

TikTok × 100K–500K × Beauty × US × sponsored video

Then track P25 / median / P75 / P90 for:

  • Views/reach
  • Engagement rate
  • Likes
  • Comments
  • Shares
  • Saves
  • Follower growth
  • Video completion/retention where available
  • Reach ÷ followers
  • Engagement ÷ reach
  • Sponsored vs organic performance

That's much more useful than saying "good TikTok engagement is 5%."

Current benchmark research strongly supports this approach: platform and creator size materially change the numbers, and TikTok, Instagram and YouTube shouldn't be treated as interchangeable measurement environments. Click Analytic SocialCrawl

One important distinction

I'd keep reach efficiency and engagement efficiency separate.

For example:

Reach index

Creator's median views ÷ benchmark median views for their platform/tier

Engagement index

Creator's median engagements ÷ median views, compared with the benchmark

Then you can classify creators:

  • High reach / high engagement → stars
  • High reach / low engagement → distribution-heavy
  • Low reach / high engagement → strong community creators
  • Low reach / low engagement → needs attention

That becomes much more actionable for a network manager than a single "creator score."

One caveat: don't blindly import public benchmark percentages. Different sources define engagement differently. For example, one 2026 dataset reports TikTok median engagement of 5.52% versus Instagram 2.34%, but it's specifically (likes + comments) ÷ views on a particular sample. SocialCrawl Another benchmark dataset uses different definitions and gets very different figures. OwlScran

If I were choosing today: CreatorIQ + HypeAuditor, with your own network-level percentile benchmarks layered on top. If you're more SMB/mid-market and don't need enterprise campaign infrastructure, I'd look harder at Modash + a BI layer instead.

If you tell me roughly how many creators you manage (100 / 1K / 10K+), which platforms, and whether you're an agency/network or representing the creators directly, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and compare their capabilities/pricing.

Engagement index

Creator's median engagements ÷ median views, compared with the benchmark

Then you can classify creators:

Current benchmark research strongly supports this approach: platform and creator size materially change the numbers, and TikTok, Instagram and YouTube shouldn't be treated as interchangeable measurement environments.

One important distinction
Behind this answer: no web searches

ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.

"as an agency lead, which analytics solution offers cross-network dashboards and automated benchmark alerts for client accounts?"

Answer 1 of 1, 14th Sep 2026, unknown, does not mention you

chatgpt.com
as an agency lead, which analytics solution offers cross-network dashboards and automated benchmark alerts for client accounts?

For an agency lead, AgencyAnalytics looks like the strongest match.

  • Cross-network dashboards: Its Views feature blends paid, social, search, and web data into unified client dashboards, with 85+ integrations. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics
  • Cross-client visibility: Roll-up Reports & Dashboards aggregate metrics across multiple clients, brands, or locations so you can compare performance across the portfolio. AgencyAnalytics
  • Automated benchmark/exception alerts: Its Metric Insights supports industry benchmarks and anomaly detection, while KPI alerts notify your team when metrics hit targets or move significantly. AgencyAnalytics Knowledge Base AgencyAnalytics
  • Agency workflow: It supports white-labeling, reusable templates, scheduled reporting, and client portals—useful when you're managing reporting at scale. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics

Runner-up: Supermetrics if your agency needs more control over the underlying data pipeline and wants to push data into tools like Looker Studio, Power BI, BigQuery, or Snowflake. It also supports automated pacing alerts across ad platforms. Supermetrics

Bottom line: If your priority is “one agency platform where account managers can see cross-channel performance, benchmark clients, and get alerted when something changes,” AgencyAnalytics is the better fit. AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

Behind this answer: no web searches

ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.

‹ Newer answers