ChatGPT answers, unedited

If your priority is agency-scale client reporting + white-label delivery, I’d shortlist these:

1. otterly.ai — best overall agency fit

• Tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, and Copilot.
• Built around multi-client workspaces and recurring visibility reports.
• The important caveat: the core Otterly interface is not natively white-labeled. For true agency-branded dashboards, it recommends its Looker Studio connector; its agency partner program also includes branded reporting. Otterly Otterly AI Otterly AI
• Best if: you already use Looker Studio and want a relatively mature, scalable monitoring layer.
• outercite.com — best if white-label is non-negotiable

• Specifically designed as a multi-tenant agency/reseller platform.
• Six AI engines, unlimited client workspaces, branded reports/emails/share pages, and a wholesale/reseller model.
• More expensive: its advertised white-label base is $799/mo. Outercite
• Best if: you're actually selling AI visibility as a recurring agency product and want clients to experience your brand rather than the vendor's.
• getbrandcite.com — best simple reporting product

• Explicitly focused on producing client-ready AI visibility reports.
• Tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude and Gemini.
• Agency plan advertises $189/mo, 20 reports/month, white-label PDF export, custom templates, competitor analysis and recommendations. BrandCite
• Best if: your deliverable is primarily a polished monthly/quarterly report rather than an elaborate GEO operating system.
• agencyscope.ai — interesting lightweight option

• Built specifically for SEO agencies.
• Recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, prompt-level evidence, historical comparisons and white-label PDFs. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• Best if: you want evidence-backed reports without paying for a large enterprise GEO platform.

My pick

For most established SEO/digital agencies: OtterlyAI. Its combination of multi-client management, broad engine coverage, prompt/citation tracking and Looker Studio integration makes it the safest bet. Otterly Otterly

For an agency where white-label is the actual product requirement: Outercite. It's more explicitly built around reseller/white-label infrastructure rather than making you construct the client-facing layer yourself. Outercite

One thing I'd be careful about: don't evaluate these solely on “AI visibility score.” For client reporting, I'd prioritize whether the platform can show the exact prompt → answer → brand mention → position → cited sources → competitor → historical change. That evidence makes the report much easier to defend in an SEO client meeting.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to report on (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and your monthly budget, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, engines, white-label depth, API/Looker Studio, prompt limits, and reporting automation.

If your priority is agency-grade multi-client reporting + white-labeling, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My recommendation: Peec AI

peec.ai

For an agency, Peec has unusually good coverage of the entire reporting workflow, rather than simply being an AI rank tracker. It supports separate client workspaces, daily tracking, competitor benchmarking, automated reporting, branded dashboards, CSV/API access, and MCP integrations. Peec AI Peec AI

It currently tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot, with metrics including mention rate, average position, citations and sentiment. Peec AI

The particularly useful agency feature is that you can use its data through Looker Studio, build your own branded dashboard template, clone it for each client, and give clients read-only access without requiring a Peec login. Peec AI

And its MCP/API layer is compelling if you want to automate the boring part of reporting: Peec explicitly supports workflows that generate weekly client summaries and even compile them into Google Slides. Peec AI Peec AI

When I'd choose something else

• Choose Zumi if you specifically want maximum answer-engine coverage. It says it tracks up to nine engines, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode and DeepSeek, while keeping client workspaces and exports white-labeled. Zumi
• Choose Profound if you're selling a high-end AEO/GEO service to enterprise clients and need deeper answer-engine intelligence rather than just a reporting layer. Its dashboards cover Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, with persistent client dashboards and PDF/public-link sharing. Profound Profound
• Choose AnswerPeek if your business model is essentially “we resell AI visibility monitoring under our brand.” Its agency offering is explicitly designed around a single agency seat managing multiple brands, white-labeled reports, custom domain/branding, and client-facing PDFs. AnswerPeek
• Choose Citenzo if you want something simpler and heavily oriented toward polished monthly reports rather than a large analytics platform. Citenzo

Bottom line: for a typical SEO/content agency adding “AI visibility” to existing retainers, I'd start with Peec. For an agency where white-labeling is the product itself, I'd also demo AnswerPeek and Zumi before committing. For enterprise AEO consulting, Profound deserves the demo.

peec.ai

For an agency, Peec has unusually good coverage of the entire reporting workflow, rather than simply being an AI rank tracker. It supports separate client workspaces, daily tracking, competitor benchmarking, automated reporting, branded dashboards, CSV/API access, and MCP integrations. peec.ai peec.ai

It currently tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot, with metrics including mention rate, average position, citations and sentiment.

The particularly useful agency feature is that you can use its data through Looker Studio, build your own branded dashboard template, clone it for each client, and give clients read-only access without requiring a Peec login.

If your core requirement is “track multiple clients across major AI answer engines and send reports that look like they came from my agency,” I’d shortlist these:

My #1: LLM Pulse

llmpulse.ai is particularly interesting because it was designed around the agency use case rather than simply adding an “agency” tier to a brand-monitoring product.

It offers white-label client portals, custom domains, unlimited seats, multi-client management, API access, Looker Studio integration, and CSV/Excel exports. It currently covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews. LLM Pulse

That's a strong combination if your deliverable is something like:

“Here's how Client X is performing in AI search this month, how that compares with competitors, and what we're doing about it.”

If engine coverage is your priority: Zumi

zumihq.com claims coverage of up to nine engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and DeepSeek. It also says white-label reporting is included across its agency plans, with isolated client workspaces. Zumi

I'd look at this closely if your clients will ask, “What about Claude/Grok/DeepSeek?” rather than being satisfied with ChatGPT + Google.

If you already use AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com may be the most pragmatic choice. Its big advantage is white-label AI reporting within an established agency reporting environment, including custom AI-visibility goals and branded reports. AgencyAnalytics

That can be much easier operationally than introducing another standalone dashboard to your agency.

One important distinction

Don't choose based purely on the number of “AI engines.” I'd test each platform on your actual client prompts and look at:

1. Prompt fidelity — can you specify the questions real customers ask?
2. Citation/source tracking — does it show why a competitor is winning?
3. Share of voice / visibility trend — not merely raw mentions.
4. Client isolation — separate workspaces and competitor sets.
5. White-label depth — custom domain + portal is much better than merely putting your logo on a PDF.
6. Automated monthly/QBR reporting.
7. API/Looker Studio access if you already have your own reporting stack.

For example, Otterly can be attractive on price, but its agency white-label approach is more oriented around reporting/Looker Studio; one recent comparison puts its entry point at $29/month. DeepSmith

Bottom line: I'd demo LLM Pulse and Zumi first, then AgencyAnalytics if you're already an AgencyAnalytics shop. For enterprise clients with serious analytics requirements, add Profound to the evaluation. Recent 2026 comparisons also consistently put Profound at the enterprise/depth end and Otterly toward the accessible end of the market. Omid Saffari Profound

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you need ChatGPT + Google only or all major engines, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their current pricing/features.

“Here's how Client X is performing in AI search this month, how that compares with competitors, and what we're doing about it.”

If engine coverage is your priority: Zumi

zumihq.com claims coverage of up to nine engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and DeepSeek. It also says white-label reporting is included across its agency plans, with isolated client workspaces. Zumi

I'd look at this closely if your clients will ask, “What about Claude/Grok/DeepSeek?” rather than being satisfied with ChatGPT + Google.

If you already use AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com may be the most pragmatic choice. Its big advantage is white-label AI reporting within an established agency reporting environment, including custom AI-visibility goals and branded reports. agencyanalytics.com

That can be much easier operationally than introducing another standalone dashboard to your agency.

One important distinction

Don't choose based purely on the number of “AI engines.” I'd test each platform on your actual client prompts and look at:

If your priority is agency use + multi-client tracking + white-label client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 I'd start with Peec AI

Peec AI for Agencies

Peec is unusually well aligned with the agency workflow: one account can manage multiple clients, it offers agency-specific plans, unlimited client seats, automated reporting, and Looker Studio dashboards that clients can access without logging into Peec. You can control the dashboard's branding, layout and metrics. peec.ai

It also tracks mention rate, position, citations, sentiment and share of voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. peec.ai

The interesting differentiator is its MCP/API layer: you can automate weekly client summaries and even generate white-label reports using your own branding. peec.ai

🏢 Profound if you're selling high-end AEO

Profound for Agencies

I'd look at Profound if your agency needs enterprise-grade analysis rather than simply a reporting dashboard. It covers ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Copilot, DeepSeek and Google's AI experiences, with centralized client management and agency support. www.tryprofound.com

Its dashboards expose things like Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, and can be shared through client-facing links or PDFs. www.tryprofound.com

💰 OtterlyAI if you want simpler/cheaper

OtterlyAI

Otterly is worth considering for straightforward visibility monitoring. Its agency partner program provides unlimited workspaces and branded reporting. help.otterly.ai

One important distinction: Otterly says it does not have native white-labeling of its actual interface/URLs; the recommended route is branded Looker Studio reporting. help.otterly.ai

What I'd choose

For a typical SEO/content agency: Peec AI
For a large enterprise AEO practice: Profound
For lightweight monitoring across lots of smaller clients: OtterlyAI
If completely white-label client delivery is non-negotiable: I'd also demo RocketBlue alongside Peec; current 2026 comparisons specifically highlight its multi-brand, eight-engine and white-label capabilities. www.prismnews.com

The key thing I'd test in demos isn't just the number of engines. Ask each vendor to show you the exact client experience: agency login → client workspace → historical visibility/SOV → individual prompts → citations → competitors → branded report → automated monthly delivery. That's where the tools differ substantially.

If your priority is agency-first AI visibility reporting + true white-label delivery, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: LLM Pulse

LLM Pulse looks like the strongest match for what you described. It explicitly targets SEO agencies, supports multi-client tracking, and monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews. It also offers white-label dashboards, unlimited seats, a Looker Studio connector, CSV/Excel exports, and an API. llmpulse.ai

That combination matters because I'd distinguish between:

• "white-label PDF generator" → good for adding a monthly AI-visibility section to existing reports.
• "white-label client platform" → much better if AI visibility is becoming an actual service line.
• API/Looker Studio integration → best if you already have an agency reporting stack and don't want another client-facing dashboard.

LLM Pulse is unusually strong on the latter two.

🥈 If you mainly want beautiful client reports: AgencyScope

AgencyScope is more narrowly focused. It runs recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini and produces white-label PDFs containing prompt-level findings, representative answer evidence, methodology, competitor comparisons, and historical results. agencyscope.ai

I'd choose it if your workflow is:

SEO/GEO work → monthly report → PDF → client meeting

rather than:

dozens of clients → dashboards → integrations → ongoing GEO program.

One important caveat

Don't evaluate these tools just on the number of "AI engines" they claim to support. Measurement methodology matters enormously. AI answers are probabilistic, personalized/context-dependent, and change over time. A good agency tool should let you see the actual prompt + answer + citation/source + competitor result, rather than just giving the client a mysterious "AI visibility score." AgencyScope, for example, explicitly emphasizes answer-level evidence and separating assisted from unassisted prompts. agencyscope.ai

My ranking for an agency:

1. LLM Pulse — best overall / scalable agency infrastructure
2. AgencyScope — best pure white-label reporting
3. Asva AI — best if you want monitoring + optimization/AEO services
4. Tower GEO — promising agency-focused alternative
5. AISEOP — worth a demo for multi-brand agency management

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to monitor (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you need a white-label portal or just monthly reports, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare current pricing, engine coverage, API/Looker Studio, and per-client economics.

If your priority is agency-grade reporting + white-label delivery, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: Searchable

For an agency specifically selling “AI visibility monitoring” as a recurring client deliverable, Searchable looks particularly aligned: it explicitly offers multi-client workspaces, white-labeled reports, API access, prospect/pitch workspaces, and client reporting. www.searchable.com

That distinction matters. A lot of AI-visibility products are excellent analytics tools but weren't designed around the agency workflow of:

prospect audit → client workspace → ongoing monitoring → branded report → repeat across 10/50/100 clients.

If reporting quality is the main thing

I'd compare Searchable vs Peec vs Otterly first.

• Searchable: strongest agency workflow / white-label orientation.
• Peec: stronger choice if you want sophisticated analytics and competitive benchmarking. Recent comparisons put it in the mid-market agency sweet spot. ai-search-tools.com
• Otterly: attractive if you need to keep costs down while covering a lot of surfaces; it covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot, with additional engine options. www.demandlocal.com
• Profound: I'd reserve for larger clients where the depth of answer-engine/citation intelligence matters more than having the cleanest reseller experience. It is generally positioned toward enterprise. ai-search-tools.com

One caveat: “white-label” means different things. Some vendors mean a branded PDF; others mean a genuinely branded dashboard/client portal with your domain, logo and no visible vendor branding. If you're going to resell this as an agency service, I'd strongly favor the latter.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to monitor (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need ChatGPT + Gemini + Claude + Perplexity + Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare their current agency pricing/economics. www.therankmasters.com

If your main requirement is agency-grade reporting on client visibility inside generative answer engines, with white-label delivery, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: LLM Pulse

For a typical SEO/GEO agency, LLM Pulse looks like the strongest fit because it combines the things that are annoying to bolt together yourself: multi-client projects, fully white-labeled client portals, custom domains, recurring tracking, API access, and a Looker Studio connector. It explicitly supports reporting across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews. llmpulse.ai

The distinction I'd make is:

• Want clients to log into something that looks like your agency's software? → LLM Pulse
• Want maximum number of AI engines? → Asva AI
• Want beautiful, simple monthly PDFs rather than another dashboard? → AgencyScope
• Want inexpensive tracking that plugs into existing agency reporting? → OtterlyAI

AgencyScope is particularly interesting if you don't actually need clients accessing a platform. Its workflow is deliberately narrow: recurring prompts → evidence → branded PDF. Reports include platform breakdowns, competitor comparisons, prompt-level findings, and representative answer evidence. agencyscope.ai

One caveat: don't evaluate these purely by "number of engines." For agency reporting, I'd test whether the platform gives you repeatable prompts, historical runs, citation/source tracking, competitor share of voice, location/language controls, client isolation, scheduled reporting, and an API/Looker Studio connection. Those determine whether you can turn AI visibility into a reliable monthly deliverable rather than a collection of screenshots.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you want PDF reports, client dashboards, or both, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing/features.

If your priority is agency-grade client reporting + white-labeling, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: LLM Pulse

LLM Pulse agency platform

It looks like the strongest fit if you want to make AI visibility a recurring client deliverable, rather than simply generating occasional audits. It supports multiple client projects, white-label client portals with your logo/colors/custom domain, recurring tracking, competitive benchmarking, citations, sentiment and share of voice. It also has Looker Studio, CSV/Excel and API/MCP integrations, which is particularly useful if you already have an agency reporting stack. llmpulse.aiagencyanalytics.comagencyscope.ai

If polished PDFs are the main deliverable

AI Brand Report for Agencies

AI Brand Report is particularly compelling for a monthly/QBR report workflow. It covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok and Perplexity and provides white-label PDFs, competitive benchmarking and citation-source tracking. aibrandreport.com

If you want a lightweight SEO-agency reporting tool

AgencyScope

AgencyScope is deliberately narrower: recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, with prompt-level evidence and polished white-label PDFs. That's attractive if you don't need a full GEO optimization platform and mainly want credible evidence to put into monthly client reviews. agencyscope.aiagencyscope.ai

One more worth considering: AgencyAnalytics

AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker

If your agency already runs client reporting through AgencyAnalytics, this may actually be the most practical choice. Its AI Tracker puts AI visibility alongside GA, Google Ads, Search Console, LinkedIn and other marketing data in the same client dashboard/report, rather than creating another standalone reporting system. agencyanalytics.com

Bottom line:

• Best overall agency platform: LLM Pulse
• Best white-label PDF product: AI Brand Report
• Best simple SEO/GEO reporting workflow: AgencyScope
• Best if you already use an agency reporting suite: AgencyAnalytics
• Best for larger reseller operations: Outercite

One important distinction: don't evaluate these just on the number of engines. For agency use, I'd prioritize multi-client isolation, scheduled prompt tracking, prompt-level evidence, competitor/share-of-voice metrics, white-label client access, and API/Looker Studio integration. AI answers are volatile, so being able to show the actual prompt/evidence behind a reported change is particularly valuable. agencyscope.ai

For an agency that needs to measure clients’ visibility inside generative answer engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, etc.) and deliver reports under the agency brand, I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation by agency type

1. Boutique SEO/content agency (5–50 clients)
Pick LLM Pulse or Foglift. They’re closest to the “client logs in, sees our branding, receives a monthly GEO report” model. foglift.iollmpulse.aiopttab.com

2. Enterprise digital agency / consultancy
Pick Profound if you need deeper analytics, governance, and broader coverage. opttab.com

3. You mainly need a data feed into your existing reporting stack
Look at LLM Pulse (API/Looker Studio workflow) or similar platforms with exports/API access. llmpulse.aiopttab.com

4. You want to create a new “AI visibility monitoring” retainer quickly
Prioritize:

• branded client portal
• automated monthly reports
• competitor tracking
• prompt-level evidence (“why did ChatGPT recommend competitor X?”)
• citation/source tracking
• multi-client workspaces

A lot of tools can show an AI visibility score; fewer are designed for agencies that need to resell the insight as their own service. respona.com

If I were choosing today for a typical SEO agency adding GEO/AEO reporting, I’d start by demoing LLM Pulse, Foglift, and Profound and compare:

1. number of engines covered,
2. cost per client workspace,
3. whether reports can be fully branded,
4. whether clients can access dashboards directly. llmpulse.aiopttab.com

If your priority is agency use + multi-client tracking + genuinely client-ready/white-label reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🏆 I'd start with Peec

For an agency selling an "AI visibility / GEO" retainer, Peec looks unusually well aligned with the actual workflow. Its agency offering supports multiple clients from one account, automated reporting, client-ready dashboards, unlimited client seats, API/CSV access, and Looker Studio dashboards that clients can access without a Peec login. peec.ai

It also tracks more useful metrics than simply "mentioned/not mentioned": mention rate, position, citations, sentiment and share of voice, with daily tracking and week-over-week comparisons. peec.ai

The other particularly interesting feature is its MCP/API layer—you can automate a weekly client report and have the data summarized into client-specific reporting rather than having an account manager manually build everything. peec.ai

One important distinction

Be careful with the phrase "white label." There are really three levels:

1. Export a PDF with your logo — weak.
2. Looker Studio / BI dashboard with your branding — good, but you own the dashboard maintenance.
3. Client portal with your agency's branding, domain, and no visible vendor — true reseller white-label.

For example, OtterlyAI explicitly says it does not currently have native white-labeling; its solution is a Looker Studio connector where you create the branded dashboard yourself. help.otterly.ai

So if #3 is non-negotiable, I would not automatically choose Peec or Otterly without asking for a live demonstration of the client-facing experience.

My ranking for an agency:

Peec → Profound → AI Peekaboo → Otterly → Scrunch

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to report on (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need ChatGPT + Gemini + Perplexity + Google AI Overviews/AI Mode specifically, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 and compare actual agency pricing, client limits, white-label depth, API, and reporting automation.

If your priority is agency use + multi-client tracking + white-label reporting, my top pick right now is Peec AI.

My shortlist

🥇 Peec AI — best match for your use case

Peec is unusually focused on the exact agency workflow you're describing. It tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot, including mentions, position, citations, sentiment and share of voice. peec.ai

The particularly useful agency features are:

• Multiple client projects from one account
• Branded client dashboards
• Looker Studio connector, so you can build your own branded reporting layer
• Clients can access dashboards without a Peec login
• CSV/API access for integrating into your existing reporting stack
• Automated reporting via its MCP integration
• Dedicated agency pricing, rather than simply putting agencies on a consumer plan peec.ai

Current agency pricing starts around $245/mo for Essential, with higher tiers at $495 and $795/mo and custom enterprise pricing. peec.ai

One important caveat: if by white-label you mean a completely native white-label SaaS portal/PDF where the client never encounters Peec branding, I'd verify the exact implementation before buying. Peec's strongest white-label story is the branded Looker Studio/client-dashboard approach, rather than simply turning Peec itself into your own software. peec.ai

🏢 Profound

I'd look at Profound if you're serving larger enterprise clients and need deeper AI-search intelligence rather than primarily a reporting product.

It's more enterprise-oriented, whereas Peec feels more purpose-built around the agency → multiple clients → recurring reporting workflow.

If you're already a Semrush agency

Semrush is worth serious consideration. Its AI Visibility tooling gives you AI-search data alongside conventional SEO data, which can be compelling if your client reports already live in the Semrush ecosystem. Independent 2026 testing also singled out Semrush for detailed perception analysis, although cost can become significant. www.techradar.com

My recommendation

For an agency selling something like “AI Search / GEO Visibility Monitoring” as a recurring client service, I'd rank them:

1. Peec AI — best purpose-built agency workflow
2. Semrush — best if you want AI + traditional SEO in one ecosystem
3. Profound — best for sophisticated enterprise clients
4. Otterly AI — best if keeping costs low is important
5. Ahrefs Brand Radar — best if you're already an Ahrefs shop

One other thing I'd insist on when evaluating them: don't judge a platform just by its “visibility score.” Generative answers are stochastic, so repeated measurements can produce materially different citations and rankings. Recent research specifically argues that AI-visibility reporting should account for this uncertainty rather than presenting a single run as a precise ranking. arxiv.org

If you're choosing this specifically to resell GEO reporting to 10–100+ clients, I can also compare Peec vs Profound vs Otterly vs Semrush on pricing, number of prompts, engines, API, white-labeling, automated reports, and margins per client.

For an agency, the “best” tool depends on whether you care most about true white-label client delivery, breadth of AI engines tracked, or actionable GEO recommendations. The category is still evolving, but these are the strongest fits for agencies selling AI visibility as a service. respona.comopenlens.com

My shortlist by agency type

If you run an SEO/content agency and want to add “AI visibility” as a monthly retainer:

1. GrackerAI — probably the closest match to a traditional SEO reporting workflow. gracker.ai
2. Asva AI — good if you want a packaged AEO offer with audits + reports. asvaai.comgracker.ai

If you manage 20–100+ clients:

• Look hardest at platforms with:
  • client workspaces
  • custom branding/domain
  • scheduled reports
  • API access
  • role permissions

Ceyo and ApexGEO are positioned toward this multi-brand use case. apexgeo.appwww.ceyo.ai

If your goal is sales enablement (“show prospects they’re invisible in ChatGPT”):

• LynxAudit or AnswerPeek-style tools are attractive because they can generate quick, understandable scores and reports. lynxaudit.com

Features I would insist on before choosing

For a serious agency offering, I’d require:

• ✅ Tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and AI Overviews where possible
• ✅ Prompt-level tracking (“best X provider in [industry]”)
• ✅ Competitor share-of-voice comparisons
• ✅ Citation/source analysis (what sites AI engines trust)
• ✅ White-label PDFs and client portal/dashboard
• ✅ Scheduled automated reports
• ✅ Agency pricing that allows margin
• ✅ Export/API options

A caution: many tools are calling themselves “AI visibility” platforms, but some are closer to brand monitoring while others actually run repeated buyer-intent prompts and measure AI answer inclusion. For client retainers, the latter is usually more defensible. respona.comopenlens.com

If I were choosing for a typical 5–50 client marketing agency today, I’d start by testing GrackerAI, Asva AI, and Ceyo side-by-side, then pick based on report quality and whether clients can understand the value in under 5 minutes. gracker.ai

If your agency’s main need is client-by-client AI visibility tracking + genuinely white-label reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: LLM Pulse

LLM Pulse for Agencies

It looks particularly well matched to your use case because it was built around agencies, rather than adding an agency mode onto a brand-focused product. It offers white-label client portals with your logo, colors, and custom domain, plus multi-client management, API access, Looker Studio, and CSV/Excel exports. It tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews. llmpulse.ai

That's important if your deliverable is something like:

“Your brand's AI visibility this month”
Share of voice ↑ 18%
ChatGPT visibility: 42%
Perplexity visibility: 37%
Competitor A: 51%
Top cited sources: Forbes, Reddit, yoursite.com
Recommended actions: 3

…and you want the client to perceive it as your agency's proprietary reporting platform, not a report from a third-party SaaS.

🥈 Mentions

The newer Mentions product is interesting if you want a more polished, presentation-oriented agency offering. A recent hands-on comparison says its Agency tier includes white-labeling, a pitch workspace and unlimited client sites, while tracking visibility, sentiment, share of voice, individual prompts, AI answers and cited sources across a broad set of engines. www.techradar.com

🥉 AgencyAnalytics

AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker

If you're already using AgencyAnalytics for SEO, PPC, GA4, etc., this may actually be the smartest operational choice. Its AI Tracker puts ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini visibility into the same client reporting environment as the rest of your marketing metrics. agencyanalytics.com

One thing I'd scrutinize before buying

Don't evaluate these purely on the number of "AI engines" they claim to support. Generative answers are non-deterministic: the same prompt can produce different answers and citations at different times. Recent research specifically warns that single-run visibility measurements can give a misleadingly precise picture. arxiv.org

For an agency, I'd therefore prioritize:

1. Repeated sampling / historical trends
2. Exact prompt + exact AI answer archive
3. Citation/source tracking
4. Competitor share-of-voice
5. Multi-client management
6. Custom domain + logo + colors
7. White-label PDF/export capability
8. API/Looker Studio integration
9. Location/language-specific querying
10. Ability to export raw data so you're not locked in

Bottom line: If you're starting an agency AI-visibility service today, I'd test LLM Pulse first, then Mentions. If you already run your client reporting through AgencyAnalytics, I'd strongly consider staying inside that ecosystem instead.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to report on (10 / 50 / 100+) and your monthly budget, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and compare their actual agency pricing/features.

If you mean an agency-facing platform that tracks client visibility inside ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, etc., and lets you deliver the data under your own brand, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 I'd start with LLM Pulse

LLM Pulse for agencies specifically positions itself around white-label AI search/GEO for agencies, including white-label client portals, unlimited client seats, API/CSV/Excel exports, and tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google's AI search products. llmpulse.ai

The important distinction is that you're not merely getting an "AI SEO audit." You can potentially make AI visibility a recurring client service:

Client → Agency-branded dashboard → visibility/share-of-voice → mentions/citations → competitors → trend → monthly report.

🥈 If maximum engine coverage is important: Mentions

A recent 2026 review specifically highlighted Mentions for agencies because its Agency plan combines multi-engine tracking with white-label reporting, custom domains and client sites. It reportedly covers a particularly broad set of models, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama and Google's AI surfaces. www.techradar.com

🥉 If the deliverable is primarily reports: Rankfender

Rankfender reporting is worth a look if your agency wants to automate the actual monthly client deliverable. It offers white-label reports, scheduled weekly/monthly delivery, client portals, PDF export, competitive share of voice and integration of GSC/GA4 data. rankfender.comwww.aiseop.ai

One thing I'd scrutinize before buying

Don't judge these platforms solely by the number of engines they claim to support. AI answers are stochastic: the same prompt can produce different citations and visibility results on different runs. Recent research found substantial run-to-run variability and argues that AI visibility should be measured through repeated sampling rather than treating a single response as a definitive "ranking." arxiv.org

So for an agency, I'd prioritize:

1. Actual answer/citation capture, not just estimated rankings.
2. Repeated measurements over time.
3. Share of voice + competitor comparison.
4. Prompt-level evidence showing exactly what the AI said.
5. Citation/source analysis — which websites are causing the client to appear?
6. True white-label client portal/custom domain, not merely a logo on a PDF.
7. Automated monthly reports.
8. API/export capability if you eventually want your own agency dashboard.

Bottom line: I'd demo LLM Pulse, Mentions, and Rankfender first. If your agency's differentiator is selling GEO strategy, I'd add AISEOP to that shortlist; if it's primarily automated client reporting, Rankfender becomes especially compelling. rankfender.comwww.aiseop.ai

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to manage (10 / 50 / 100+) and whether you need a white-label portal or just PDF reports, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing/features.

If your priority is agency-grade client reporting + white-label delivery, I’d shortlist Peec AI, OtterlyAI, and Scrunch—with Peec AI as my current pick for most agencies.

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

Peec AI is particularly well suited if you're selling AI visibility/AEO as an ongoing agency service, rather than merely wanting an internal monitoring tool.

It tracks mention rate, position, citations, sentiment and competitors across six major AI channels, with daily updates. More importantly for an agency, it has unlimited client seats, dedicated pitch projects, automated reporting, API access and Looker Studio dashboards that clients can access without a Peec login. peec.ai

Peec AI for Agencies

The pitch-project functionality is especially useful: you can run a prospect's AI visibility profile before they become a client, then convert it into a client project. peec.ai

I'd choose Peec if your business model is:

Track 10–100+ clients → send branded monthly/weekly reports → show visibility/SOV/citation movement → use the data to justify an AEO retainer.

🥈 OtterlyAI — best if cost/scale matters

OtterlyAI is compelling if you have lots of smaller clients and want inexpensive monitoring at scale. Its agency offering includes separate client workspaces, pitch workspaces, unlimited brand reports and a Looker Studio connector for branded dashboards. otterly.ai

One important distinction: OtterlyAI itself is not natively white-label. Its own documentation explicitly says the interface/URLs can't be rebranded; the white-label experience comes through Looker Studio. help.otterly.ai

That's perfectly workable for an agency, but it adds a layer.

OtterlyAI Agency offering

🥉 Scrunch — best if you're selling optimization, not just reporting

Scrunch is the one I'd investigate if your agency wants to go beyond "here's your AI visibility score."

It combines monitoring, citation analysis, auditing, optimization and AI-content delivery, with an API for building your own client dashboards. Its agency infrastructure is designed around managing multiple brands and prospects. ai-cdn.scrunchai.com

Scrunch

The tradeoff is that it's more of a full AEO/GEO platform than a lightweight reporting engine, so it makes more sense if you're actually delivering optimization work.

What I'd use depending on your agency

SEO/content agency with 5–30 clients: → Peec AI

Large volume / SMB clients: → OtterlyAI

Agency specializing in AEO/GEO strategy: → Scrunch

Enterprise/large brands: → Profound

You mainly want beautiful, simple client reports: → Peec or Mentions

One other interesting option is Mentions: TechRadar's July 2026 review specifically highlighted its Agency plan ($399/month), unlimited client sites, pitch workspace and fully white-labeled reporting. www.techradar.com

Bottom line: if I were starting an agency AI-visibility service today, I'd trial Peec first, then compare it head-to-head with Scrunch. The crucial test isn't just "does it track ChatGPT?"—it's whether you can take raw visibility data and turn it into a repeatable, branded client deliverable with minimal human work. Peec currently looks strongest on that particular workflow. peec.ai

If your priority is agency client reporting + white-label delivery, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: OtterlyAI

For exactly what you described—“I manage multiple clients and need to show them how visible they are inside ChatGPT/Google AI/Perplexity/etc.”—OtterlyAI is probably the most straightforward choice.

It tracks brand mentions, citations, competitors and prompts across the major AI engines, and its agency partner program includes unlimited workspaces and branded reporting. help.otterly.ai

One important nuance: OtterlyAI's standard product doesn't have native white-labeling of the actual interface. Its current workaround is branded Looker/Data Studio reporting, while its Agency Partner program advertises branded reporting. help.otterly.ai

If you already use Semrush

I'd seriously consider Semrush AI Visibility instead. It has presentation-ready AI visibility reports, competitor analysis, prompt research and tracking across ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity. Its Pro Reports specifically support branding and white-labeling. www.semrush.com

One thing I'd insist on

Don't evaluate these tools purely on their "AI Visibility Score." Generative answers are stochastic, so a single observation can be noisy; repeated sampling and trends are much more meaningful. Recent research specifically cautions that point estimates of AI citation visibility can give a misleading sense of precision. arxiv.org

Bottom line:

• Agency-first + easiest client reporting: OtterlyAI
• SEO agency wanting one platform: Semrush
• Enterprise/deep AI-search intelligence: Profound
• Reporting/monitoring specialist worth testing: Mentions

If you tell me roughly how many clients/domains you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200+), I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 based on price, white-label depth, number of prompts, engines, API access, and client portals.

If your agency's primary goal is measuring and reporting client visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, and Google AI Overviews with white-label reports, there are a handful of platforms that stand out.

My top recommendation: Outercite

If I were building an agency offering around AI visibility today, Outercite would likely be the first platform I'd evaluate because it's purpose-built for agencies rather than adapted from an in-house SEO product. It offers:

• White-label reports and share pages
• Multi-tenant client workspaces
• Agency dashboard
• Coverage across major generative engines
• Wholesale pricing intended for reselling AI visibility as a service outercite.com

This makes it particularly attractive if you want clients to perceive the reporting as your agency's own platform.

Best if you're already doing marketing reporting

If your agency already delivers SEO and paid media reports, AgencyReportr is compelling because AI visibility is integrated alongside:

• SEO rankings
• Google Ads
• Meta Ads
• White-label dashboards
• Custom domains

Instead of introducing another reporting platform, you can add AI visibility as another section in existing client reports. agencyreportr.comoutercite.com

Best for selling AI visibility audits

If your sales process starts with a free audit or assessment, Asva AI is worth a look. It emphasizes:

• Free branded client audits
• Multi-client management
• White-label reporting
• Tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and additional engines asvaai.comoutercite.com

Enterprise option

For agencies managing dozens or hundreds of brands, Ceyo is built around:

• One dashboard for many clients
• White-label exports
• API
• Partner/reseller model
• Scalable pricing www.ceyo.ai

Features I'd consider mandatory

Whatever platform you choose, I'd look for these capabilities:

• Monitoring across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, and Google AI Overviews
• Prompt-level tracking (not just aggregate scores)
• Share of voice vs. competitors
• Citation/source analysis
• Historical trend reporting
• White-label PDFs
• Live client dashboard
• Scheduled monthly reports
• API or Looker Studio integration
• Multi-location and multi-brand support

If you're an SEO agency

I'd lean toward:

1. Outercite
2. AgencyReportr
3. Asva AI

These are the strongest combinations of agency workflow, white-label reporting, and coverage of the major generative answer engines based on current offerings. outercite.com

If your agency manages 50+ clients, I can also compare these tools on pricing, APIs, automation, and reseller margins to help identify the best fit for larger-scale operations.

If you’re an agency selling AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) reporting to clients, I’d shortlist tools based on three things:

1. Coverage — can it measure visibility in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Google AI Overviews, etc.?
2. Agency workflow — multi-client dashboards, scheduled reports, exports, permissions.
3. True white-labeling — your logo/domain/client experience, not just a PDF with a logo slapped on. respona.comrankfender.com

Best options for agencies

My picks by agency type

Small/mid-size SEO agency adding a new GEO retainer

• Start with Rankfender or Outercite.
• Prioritize branded dashboards, automated monthly reports, and competitor/share-of-voice views. outercite.comrankfender.comgracker.ai

Agency trying to resell “AI search visibility” as its own product

• Look at GrackerAI or Outercite because they emphasize multi-client operations and reseller-style delivery. outercite.comrankfender.comgracker.ai

Enterprise marketing consultancy

• Consider LLMPulse, Profound, or similar enterprise platforms where deeper analytics matter more than simple reporting. www.aipeekaboo.com

Features I would require before buying

• Prompt tracking by client industry/location
• Competitor visibility comparison
• Citation/source tracking (what websites AI engines rely on)
• Historical trend reporting
• Client portal access
• Custom domain + logo + colors
• API/export options
• Scheduled monthly PDF/email reports

A lot of “AI visibility” tools are built for brands, not agencies, so the white-label and multi-account workflow is the deciding factor. respona.com

If I were choosing for a typical SEO/content agency today, I’d test Rankfender vs Outercite vs GrackerAI first. gracker.airankfender.com

If you're running an agency and your priorities are:

• Multi-client management
• Visibility tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.
• White-label reports and client portals
• Automated reporting
• Reseller-friendly pricing

then these are the strongest options today.

My top recommendations

1. Outercite — Best overall agency platform

• Built specifically for agencies rather than in-house marketers.
• Unlimited isolated client workspaces.
• Branded reports, emails, and share pages.
• Agency wholesale pricing for reselling.
• Tracks visibility across the major generative engines. outercite.com

Best if you manage 20+ clients.

2. Asva AI — Best for winning new business
What stands out:

• Free AI visibility audits for prospects.
• White-label reports.
• Multi-client dashboard.
• Tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and additional AI platforms.
• Designed to help agencies sell AI visibility retainers. asvaai.comoutercite.com

Great if you're actively pitching new clients.

3. Mentions — Best reporting experience
Strengths:

• Clean client reports.
• Share of voice.
• Citation tracking.
• Per-prompt analysis.
• White-label reporting on the Agency plan.
• Unlimited client sites. www.techradar.comoutercite.com

Excellent for agencies that present monthly executive reports.

Features I'd insist on before buying

Not every "AI visibility" platform measures the same things. Look for:

• Visibility by AI engine (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Google AI Overviews)
• Exact prompts that trigger mentions
• Citation/source tracking
• Competitor comparisons
• Share of voice
• Historical trend reporting
• Scheduled PDF reports
• Client portals
• Custom branding
• API access (if you want to build your own dashboards)
• Multi-location and multi-language tracking

If I were choosing today

• Best enterprise agency: Outercite
• Best mid-sized agency: Asva AI
• Best reporting/UI: Mentions
• Best if you want automated monthly executive reports: Rankfender
• Best if you also want an embeddable/API solution: Ceyo outercite.com

If your primary requirement is agency-first, white-label reporting across multiple generative answer engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.), I'd separate the market into three tiers.

My recommendations

1. Outercite (overall best for agencies)

• Designed specifically around agency workflows rather than adapting an enterprise product.
• Unlimited client workspaces.
• Wholesale/reseller pricing.
• White-label reports, emails, and share pages.
• Tracks most major LLMs from a single dashboard.
• Good if AI visibility will become a recurring service offering. outercite.com

2. Rankfender (best reporting experience)
This stands out if polished client reporting is the priority.

Features include:

• Fully branded reports
• Scheduled monthly/weekly delivery
• Client portal
• Competitive share of voice
• AI visibility trends
• GA4 and GSC integration
• PDF exports rankfender.comaibrandreport.comoutercite.com

3. AgencyReportr (best if you're already an SEO agency)
Instead of adding another dashboard, this combines:

• SEO reporting
• Google Ads
• Meta Ads
• AI visibility
• White-label reporting under your own domain

This works well for agencies that don't want AI reporting to live separately from existing marketing reports. agencyreportr.comoutercite.com

If you're selling GEO/AEO retainers

I'd prioritize tools that report:

• AI citation rate
• Share of voice
• Brand mentions
• Competitor comparisons
• Sources cited by AI
• Prompt-level history
• Trends over time
• Executive summaries clients can understand

Clients generally care less about raw prompt logs than clear answers to questions like:

• "How often are we recommended?"
• "Which competitors appear instead of us?"
• "Is visibility improving month over month?"
• "What actions should we take next?"

Enterprise option

If you're already heavily invested in SEO tooling, the Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit is worth considering because it integrates AI visibility with traditional SEO and backlink analysis. However, it is more of an enterprise SEO platform than an agency-focused white-label reporting solution. www.techradar.com

My shortlist

If I were choosing today for an agency, I'd rank them:

1. Outercite — best overall agency platform
2. Rankfender — strongest reporting and client deliverables
3. AgencyReportr — best if you already provide SEO/PPC reporting
4. Ceyo — best for larger multi-brand agencies or SaaS providers
5. AI Brand Report — solid value for mid-sized agencies outercite.com

If your agency manages 50+ clients or you plan to resell AI visibility under your own brand, I can also recommend platforms based on factors like API access, custom domains, automated report scheduling, and client seat pricing.

If your primary requirement is agency-first AI visibility reporting with white-label client deliverables, the strongest options today are:

My top recommendations

1. Outercite (Best overall for agencies)

If I were building an AI visibility service inside an agency today, this would be my first evaluation.

Strengths:

• Built specifically for agencies rather than retrofitting an enterprise platform
• Unlimited client workspaces
• White-label reports, portals, and emails
• Tracks major answer engines from one dashboard
• Agency pricing and reseller margins designed for recurring retainers outercite.com

Best for:

• SEO agencies
• Digital marketing agencies
• Fractional CMOs
• GEO/AEO consultancies

2. LLM Pulse (Best for enterprise agencies)

Ideal if you want to provide clients with their own portal.

Highlights:

• Full white-label portals
• API
• Looker Studio connector
• Unlimited user seats
• CSV/Excel exports
• Agency dashboard across all clients llmpulse.ai

3. GrackerAI (Best reporting experience)

Especially good if monthly reporting is your core deliverable.

Includes:

• Branded PDF reports
• Automated monthly reports
• Client workspaces
• View-only client access
• Reseller pricing gracker.ai

4. AgencyReportr (Best if you're replacing Looker Studio)

Interesting because it combines traditional marketing reporting with AI visibility.

Tracks:

• SEO
• Google Ads
• Meta Ads
• ChatGPT
• Perplexity
• Google AI Overviews

This is attractive if you don't want clients logging into separate reporting systems. agencyreportr.com

Features I'd insist on

Regardless of vendor, I'd look for:

• Engine-by-engine reporting (don't rely on a single blended score)
• Prompt-level tracking
• Brand mention tracking
• Citation/source tracking
• Competitor share of voice
• Scheduled PDF reports
• White-label client portal
• API access
• Historical trend data
• Multi-user permissions
• Multi-client management

One important caveat: AI answers are inherently variable. Stronger platforms reduce noise by running repeated prompts across multiple engines and reporting trends over time rather than treating a single response as definitive. arxiv.org

If you're an agency owner

I'd shortlist these based on agency size:

• Small (1–10 clients): urlAgencyReportrturn0search5
• Growing (10–50 clients): urlOuterciteturn0search0
• Larger (50+ clients): urlLLM Pulseturn0search6
• Reporting-heavy agencies: urlGrackerAIturn0search1

These platforms are purpose-built around AI visibility and white-label delivery, whereas broader SEO suites are still evolving their AI visibility capabilities.