ChatGPT answers, unedited

Yes. There are now several platforms specifically aimed at agencies selling AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) services with multi-client dashboards, AI Share of Voice tracking, and white-label reporting. The category is still emerging, but these are the closest fits:

A few things to watch when evaluating them:

Metrics that matter for client reporting

A useful agency dashboard usually includes:

• AI Share of Voice (SoV)

% of tracked AI answers where the client appears vs competitors

• Mention rate

• “How often is the brand named?”
• Position/rank

• Whether the brand is recommended first, second, etc.
• Citation footprint

• Which websites AI engines rely on when mentioning the brand
• Sentiment/context

• Whether mentions are positive, neutral, or negative
• Prompt coverage

• Which buyer questions are being tracked
• Trend reporting

• Month-over-month movement

If you are building an agency offer

The closest analog is probably an SEO reporting stack (Semrush Agency, AgencyAnalytics, Looker Studio) but for AI answers. The winning workflow tends to be:

1. Add client + competitors
2. Define 50–200 buyer prompts
3. Track ChatGPT / Gemini / Claude / Perplexity responses
4. Calculate SoV and citation gaps
5. Deliver monthly branded report
6. Tie improvements to content, PR, and technical changes

If your requirement is specifically “clients log into reports.youragency.com and never see the underlying vendor”, prioritize platforms that offer true client portals (for example Geneo, ReachLLM, Rankfender). If PDF/deck white-labeling is enough, there are more options. Geneo ReachLLM RankFender

I can also put together a comparison by price, API availability, number of clients supported, and whether they allow full SaaS resale/true white-labeling if you're evaluating this as an agency product.

Yes. There’s now a fairly crowded category around AI search visibility / GEO reporting for agencies, and several products specifically support multi-client accounts + white-label dashboards/reports + AI Share of Voice.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — probably closest to the classic “white-label client portal” model. Custom domain, logo, branding, client portal, live dashboards, Share of Voice, mentions and citations. Geneo
• getintel.ai — multi-client dashboard, white-label reports, Share of Voice, competitor tracking, and a Looker Studio connector, which is interesting if agencies already have reporting infrastructure. GetIntel
• reachllm.com — white-label platform/client dashboards with SOV, visibility score, average rank, citation rate and source-gap reporting. Also offers a managed-service model behind the agency's brand. ReachLLM
• rankfender.com — particularly focused on automated agency reporting: white-label reports, scheduled delivery, client portals, PDF exports, competitive SOV and integrations with GSC/GA4. RankFender
• answerpeek.com — designed around managing an entire client book from one seat, with white-label reports, client links, SOV and competitor analysis. AnswerPeek
• ai-mention.net — explicitly positioned as a white-label GEO platform, with per-client portals, custom domains/branding and an agency-level overview. AI Mention
• seerly.app — more evidence-oriented reporting, including SOV, visibility, sentiment, citations and the underlying AI responses behind metrics. White-label reports are supported. Seerly

If you're thinking about building one

The interesting thing is that “AI Share of Voice” itself is becoming commoditized. The more differentiated agency product seems to be:

Client → branded portal → SOV/visibility → competitor comparison → citation/source evidence → actions taken → historical impact

rather than just:

Client → “you're 37% visible in ChatGPT.”

For example, ReachLLM exposes things like SOV, average rank, citation rate and source gaps, while Seerly emphasizes being able to drill from a metric into the underlying AI response. ReachLLM Seerly

There are also platforms going further into agency infrastructure—API, webhooks, Looker Studio, client isolation, automated reports, etc.—which makes them more suitable if you're trying to build AI visibility into an existing agency reporting stack. GetIntel Pondral

If you're asking because you want to build a platform like this, rather than just find one to use, that's a slightly different and potentially interesting question. I can map out the existing competitors, their feature/pricing gaps, and what a differentiated white-label AI SOV platform would need to offer agencies in 2026.

Yes. There’s now a fairly crowded category of AI visibility / GEO platforms specifically targeting agencies. They measure things like AI Share of Voice, brand mentions, citations, competitor visibility, sentiment, and visibility by engine, then package the results into client-facing reports or dashboards.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — probably one of the closest matches to what you described. It offers white-label client portals, custom domain/logo/branding, Share of Voice, mentions, citations, and tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity. Geneo
• aipeekaboo.com — particularly interesting if you want a branded dashboard + Looker/Data Studio reporting. It supports custom domains, client share links, white-label reports, and Share of Voice metrics. Peekaboo
• citaim.com — more reporting-oriented. It has multi-client workspaces, SOV by client, competitor analysis, citations, alerts, API/MCP, and white-label PDFs. One limitation: its client-facing dashboard remains Citaim-branded; the white-label portion is the reports. Citaim
• rankfender.com — agency reporting with white-label reports, client portals, automated delivery, per-engine breakdowns and competitive SOV. RankFender
• pondral.com — built around multi-client agency operations, with client-scoped dashboards, weekly audits across several AI engines, white-label reports, API/webhooks and provenance data. Pondral
• 42a.ai — explicitly positioned as a white-label GEO infrastructure/partner platform. Your agency gets the brand/client relationship while 42A powers the underlying AI visibility measurement. 42A
• answerpeek.com — white-label live reports/PDFs, custom domain, multi-client management, SOV and competitor analysis. AnswerPeek
• citenzo.com — specifically pitches white-label AI visibility reporting, including SOV, trends and before/after lift across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok and Google AI Overviews. Citenzo

If you're evaluating this as an agency product

I'd separate them into three buckets:

The interesting thing is that "AI Share of Voice" itself is becoming a standardized agency deliverable. Vogue reported this month that Launchmetrics and KCD are incorporating an AI Visibility metric into fashion/PR reporting, which is a good indication that agencies are starting to sell this as a measurable client KPI rather than simply calling it "GEO." Vogue

If you're asking because you're considering building a platform like this, that's even more interesting: the current products seem to have a gap between AI rank tracking and a genuinely polished Agency → Client reporting SaaS. I can map out the existing competitors, their pricing/features, and where there may still be an underserved niche.

Yes. A few platforms are emerging specifically for agencies that need to sell/report AI visibility (AI search/GEO) metrics to clients with white-label dashboards. The category is still fairly new, but these are some of the closer fits:

A typical agency workflow looks like:

1. Add client brand + competitors.
2. Define buyer-intent prompts (e.g., “best CRM for startups,” “best roofing company near me”).
3. Track AI responses across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and AI Overviews.
4. Calculate: - AI Share of Voice (% of mentions)
5. Competitor comparison
6. Citation/source growth
7. Sentiment
8. Visibility trend over time
9. Send a branded dashboard/report under the agency’s name.

A few things to check before choosing:

• Prompt-level transparency: Can you show exactly which prompts produced mentions?
• Citation tracking: Does it show why a brand appeared (sources, links, references)?
• Multi-client isolation: Can each client have their own portal?
• Custom domain: Does it support something like ai.youragency.com?
• API/export: Important if you want to build your own reporting layer.

If you are building an agency offer around GEO/AI SEO, I’d lean toward Geneo, Peekaboo, or Rankfender-style tools because they are closer to a reseller/managed-service model rather than just analytics. Geneo Peekaboo RankFender

If you mean a platform where your agency can resell the dashboard as if it were your own SaaS product (custom domain, client logins, no vendor branding), the shortlist gets smaller.

Yes. There’s now a fairly crowded category of AI visibility / GEO platforms built specifically for agencies, including white-label client reporting and share-of-voice metrics.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — Probably closest to what you described if you want an actual white-label client portal. It supports your domain/logo, client dashboards, Share of Voice, mentions, citations, and reporting across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity. Geneo
• citaim.com — Agency-oriented, with per-client workspaces, competitive SOV, five AI engines, historical tracking, and white-label PDFs. It also has an API/MCP layer. Citaim
• pondral.com — More enterprise/agency-ops oriented. It offers multi-client workspaces, weekly five-engine audits, white-label reports and a white-label client portal, plus API/webhooks. Pondral
• aipeekaboo.com — Strong if you already use Looker Studio. It supports branded Looker Studio reports, share links, SOV, mentions and citations. Peekaboo
• citenzo.com — Specifically positioned as a white-label AI visibility reporting layer for SEO agencies, with SOV, trends and before/after lift. Citenzo
• aibrandreport.com — 25 client brands on its agency plan, client guest access, competitive benchmarking, citations and white-label PDFs. AI Brand Report
• usecliro.com — White-label scheduled reports with SOV, model-level visibility, citations, and optional GA4/Search Console data. Usecliro
• 42a.ai — Interesting if you want to resell the entire platform under your own brand, including an agency-branded AI visibility dashboard rather than just PDFs. 42A

If I were evaluating them for an agency

I'd separate the market into three buckets:

One important distinction: "AI share of voice" isn't yet a standardized metric. Different platforms may calculate it differently—for example, share of tracked answers in which a brand appears versus weighted position/visibility across prompts and engines. So if you're considering this for client reporting, I'd scrutinize the methodology and underlying raw responses, not just the dashboard.

There is also a notable trend toward agencies packaging this as a recurring GEO/AI visibility service line, rather than simply adding an AI chart to an SEO report. Vogue

If you're thinking about building one, rather than buying one, I can also map out the current competitive landscape and identify the gap these platforms aren't serving well.

Yes. There are now several platforms aimed specifically at agencies selling AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) services that include AI Share of Voice metrics, competitor tracking, client workspaces, and white-label dashboards or reports. The category is still emerging, but these are some of the closest fits:

A typical agency dashboard in this category reports metrics like:

• AI Share of Voice — % of AI answers where the client appears vs competitors
• AI Visibility Score — composite score across prompts/models
• Mention frequency — how often ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, etc. mention the brand
• Citation footprint — which websites/sources AI engines rely on
• Competitor comparison — who is winning specific buyer-intent prompts
• Trend reporting — month-over-month improvement
• Prompt-level tracking — e.g., “best CRM for startups” or “best dentist in Austin”

For an agency, I’d separate them into two buckets:

Best if you want a client-facing SaaS-like portal

• Geneo
• Peekaboo
• Asva AI

These appear closer to “give every client their own login/dashboard” workflows. Geneo Peekaboo Asvaai

Best if you mainly need monthly reporting deliverables

• Citenzo
• Rankfender
• CrawlPod

These lean more toward branded reports you can drop into an existing SEO/marketing reporting process. Citenzo RankFender CrawlPod

If you’re evaluating this as an agency owner, the key questions I’d ask vendors are:

1. Can each client have an isolated workspace?
2. Can the client URL be your domain (e.g., reports.youragency.com)?
3. Can you hide the vendor name completely?
4. Can you export branded PDFs for QBRs?
5. Does it track the exact prompts your clients care about?
6. Does it measure competitive share of voice, not just mentions?

The strongest positioning opportunity right now is packaging this as a new retainer line: “AI Visibility Reporting” or “GEO Monitoring” alongside SEO reporting, because many clients are starting to ask why they do or don’t appear in AI answers. vogue.com

Yes — there are now several platforms specifically aimed at agencies selling/reporting AI visibility (GEO/AEO) to clients, including share-of-voice metrics and white-label dashboards.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — probably closest to the classic “agency reporting platform” model. Custom domain, agency logo/colors, client portals, Share of Voice, visibility, mentions, and reports. Their agency plans currently start around $129/mo for 5 client seats. Geneo
• llmpulse.ai — white-label AI visibility platform with multi-client dashboards plus a Looker Studio connector, which is particularly interesting if an agency already has a reporting stack. LLM Pulse
• zumihq.com — built explicitly around agencies: separate client workspaces, Share of Voice/mention-rate reporting, white-label exports, and support for up to nine AI engines. Zumi
• llmmetrix.com — especially focused on competitive AI Share of Voice. It shows the client's share vs. competitors and supports white-label live reports/PDFs. LLM Metrix
• towergeo.com — agency-oriented monitoring across major AI engines with sentiment, citation frequency, competitive positioning, and white-label PDF/live dashboards. Tower GEO
• asvaai.com — multi-client AEO platform with Share of Voice benchmarking, citation monitoring, and white-label dashboards/reports. Asvaai
• ai-mention.net — particularly interesting if you want a fully rebranded client portal with your own domain, logo and colors, and the ability to resell the service. AI Mention
• citenzo.com — more narrowly focused on turning AI visibility into an agency report: score, Share of Voice, competitors, and before/after lift. Citenzo

If you're evaluating this as an agency product

I'd separate the market into three categories:

For pure client reporting, I'd look hardest at Geneo, LLM Pulse, Zumi, and LLM Metrix.

One important distinction: “AI Share of Voice” isn't yet a standardized metric. Different vendors can calculate it differently—e.g. share of brand mentions, share of cited brands, percentage of prompts where the brand appears, or weighted position in answers. So if you're considering this for client reporting, I'd scrutinize the methodology more than the dashboard UI.

And the market is clearly moving in this direction: even established PR/marketing measurement companies are beginning to incorporate AI Visibility metrics into client reporting. Vogue

If you're thinking about building a platform like this yourself, I can also map out the existing competitors, their pricing/features, and where there appears to be a gap in the market.

Yes. There are now several platforms aimed specifically at agencies selling AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) services that provide client dashboards, share-of-voice metrics, competitor tracking, and white-label reporting. The category is still emerging, but these are the closest fits:

Common metrics these platforms expose:

• AI Share of Voice (percentage of mentions vs. competitors)
• AI Visibility Score
• Prompt/query-level rankings
• Brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.
• Citation/source tracking
• Sentiment of AI responses
• Competitor comparisons
• Trend lines over time
• Client-ready PDF reports and dashboards Citenzo Visbee

A few buying considerations for an agency:

• If you want to resell as a new service: look at Geneo, Zumi, or 42A-style platforms because they lean toward agency portals and white-labeling. Geneo 42A
• If you already have SEO reporting (AgencyAnalytics, Looker Studio, etc.) and just need an AI visibility module: Citenzo or Rankfender-style reporting may fit better. Citenzo RankFender
• If your clients are enterprise brands: prioritize platforms with robust competitor sets, historical tracking, and export/API options rather than just a single “AI score.” Visbee

The closest match to the classic “agency dashboard → client logs in → sees your branding → tracks AI SOV monthly” model today appears to be Geneo, Zumi, and Visbee. Geneo Zumi Visbee

I can also put together a comparison matrix with pricing, number of clients supported, tracked AI engines, API availability, and whether clients can log in directly.

Yes. A new category of AI visibility / AI search optimization (AIO/GEO) reporting platforms has emerged specifically for agencies that need to show clients metrics like:

• AI Share of Voice (SOV)
• brand mentions in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc.
• competitor comparisons
• citation/source tracking
• AI visibility scores over time
• white-labeled dashboards and reports

Some platforms that fit the agency use case:

A few things to watch for when evaluating:

1. “White-label report” vs true white-label portal

Many tools mean only:

• export a PDF
• add your logo
• remove their branding

A true agency platform usually provides:

• client logins
• separate client workspaces
• your domain/subdomain
• your branding throughout the UI

Geneo and Pondral are examples of platforms positioning around the fuller portal model. Geneo Pondral

2. Define “AI share of voice”

Different vendors calculate SOV differently. Ask whether they measure:

• % of tracked prompts where the brand appears
• rank/position in AI answers
• frequency of mentions
• citations earned
• sentiment
• competitor displacement (“who gets mentioned instead?”)

3. Agency workflow features matter

For an agency, I would prioritize:

• unlimited or high client/project limits
• scheduled monthly reports
• competitor tracking
• prompt libraries by industry
• API/export capability
• client-safe views
• recommendations tied to actions

If you are building an AI SEO/GEO service line for clients, the closest matches today are probably Geneo, Rankfender, Pondral, Citenzo, and Cliro depending on whether you want a SaaS-style client portal or mainly automated reporting. Geneo RankFender Pondral Citenzo Cliro

I can also put together a comparison by pricing, number of clients supported, API availability, and whether the dashboard can be fully rebranded under the agency’s domain.

Yes — there’s now a pretty active category around GEO/AEO (Generative Engine Optimization) reporting for agencies, and several platforms specifically support AI share of voice + white-label client reporting.

A few worth looking at:

• zumihq.com — Probably closest to what you described. Multi-client workspaces, share of voice/mention rate, competitor tracking, up to 9 AI engines, and white-label reporting on agency plans. Zumi
• geobubbles.com — Very agency-oriented: one account for multiple clients, white-label dashboards, branded reports, custom report builder, and client-facing executive views. Tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude. GEObubbles
• rankfender.com — Strong if reporting is the priority. White-label reports, client portals, automated delivery, competitive AI share of voice, plus GSC/GA4 integration. RankFender
• llmpulse.ai — More of a full GEO platform: white-label platform, multi-client dashboards, API and Looker Studio integration. LLM Pulse
• outrankgeo.com — Multi-brand management, competitive benchmarking, share of AI-generated mentions, white-label PDFs and shareable client reports. OUTRANKgeo
• towergeo.com — Specifically positions itself as an agency platform, with client workspaces, branded dashboards, PDF reports and competitive visibility metrics. Tower GEO

If you're specifically thinking about "AI Share of Voice"

I'd separate the market into three types:

For an agency, I'd prioritize Zumi, GeoBubbles, Rankfender, and LLM Pulse based on the feature set currently advertised.

One interesting signal: the terminology is not yet standardized. You'll see AI Share of Voice, Share of Model, AI Visibility, Mention Rate, Citation Share, and GEO Score used for overlapping but slightly different metrics. For example, Zumi explicitly describes a "mention-rate and share-of-voice read," while AEO Platform calls the metric "Share of Model." Zumi AEO Platform

If you're asking because you're considering building a platform in this space: yes, there is competition, but I see a potential gap around a really polished agency-facing "AI SOV dashboard" rather than another GEO optimization suite. The killer product would probably be something like Semrush/Looker Studio for AI visibility: client workspaces → branded dashboard → SOV by prompt/category/competitor/engine → historical trend → citations → automated monthly/QBR narrative.

I can also map out the competitive landscape, pricing, APIs, and white-label capabilities of ~15 of these platforms and identify where the biggest product gap is.

Yes. This is becoming a distinct category often called AI visibility, AI search optimization (AISO), generative engine optimization (GEO), or AI share-of-voice reporting. Several platforms are building agency features specifically around multi-client dashboards, white-label reports, and branded portals. Qwairy AEO Platform

Some options to look at:

Typical metrics these platforms report:

• AI Share of Voice — percentage of tracked prompts where a brand appears vs competitors
• AI visibility score — aggregate presence across AI engines
• Citation share — which domains AI models cite when discussing a brand/category
• Competitor comparison — “Brand A appears in 42% of answers vs Competitor B at 28%”
• Sentiment / recommendation strength
• Prompt-level tracking — e.g., “best CRM for startups” or “best dentist near me”
• Trend lines showing improvement after GEO/SEO work

If you’re an agency, the main decision is usually:

• Need a client-facing portal under your domain? → Geneo, Seeno, Qwairy, or similar agency-first tools. Geneo Seeno Qwairy
• Need AI metrics inside your existing SEO reports? → AgencyAnalytics-type approach. AgencyAnalytics
• Need to package this as a new monthly retainer service? → Prioritize multi-client workspaces, scheduled reports, custom domains, and API access.

The market is still early, so I’d evaluate whether a vendor is actually measuring AI answers from multiple models (ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/Perplexity etc.) versus just producing an “AI SEO score” from a proprietary formula. Geneo Seeno

Yes. There’s now a fairly clear category around AI visibility / GEO (generative engine optimization) reporting, and several platforms are specifically targeting agencies with white-label client reporting.

The ones I’d look at first:

• geneo.app — Probably closest to your description. Agency-focused, with custom domain, logo/colors, client portal, AI visibility and Share of Voice, tracking ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity. Geneo
• citenzo.com — Specifically emphasizes white-label AI visibility reporting, Share of Voice, competitor comparisons and before/after lift. It supports multiple clients in one dashboard. Citenzo
• usecliro.com — Strong if your priority is automated client reporting: white-label reports, scheduled delivery, Share of Voice, citations and AI traffic, with PDF/CSV and shareable links. Cliro
• rankfender.com — Built around agency reporting, including white-label reports, client portals, competitive Share of Voice, GA4/GSC integration and scheduled reports. RankFender
• prominara.com — More of a full GEO platform. It offers multi-client workspaces, branded client portals, white-label PDFs and scheduled client reports with Share of Voice. Prominara
• 42a.ai — Interesting if you want to resell AI visibility as your own agency product. It explicitly offers white-label GEO with your logo/domain and hides the underlying platform from clients. 42A
• pondral.com — Agency-oriented multi-client setup, white-label client portal/reports, Share of Voice tracking, API/webhooks and auditability of the underlying AI responses. Pondral

If you're evaluating this as an agency product

I'd distinguish between three types:

For a client-facing white-label dashboard specifically, I'd shortlist Geneo, Prominara, Pondral, and 42A.

For monthly automated reports/decks, I'd look hardest at Cliro, Citenzo, and Rankfender.

One thing I'd scrutinize before buying: what exactly they mean by "Share of Voice." The better systems calculate it from a defined prompt/competitor universe and preserve the underlying AI responses, rather than giving you a proprietary 0–100 "visibility score" that is difficult to explain to a client.

If you're actually thinking about building a platform like this, I can also map out the existing competitors, their pricing/features, and where there appears to be a gap in the market for an agency-focused AI SOV reporting product.

Yes — there are several platforms now specifically targeting agencies that need AI/GEO share-of-voice reporting with white-label client delivery.

Strongest options

• geneo.app — Probably the closest match to what you're describing. It offers multi-client AI visibility tracking, Share of Voice, sentiment, citations, custom domains, agency branding, and client portals. Geneo
• agencyanalytics.com — Interesting if you already run an agency reporting stack. AI visibility metrics can sit alongside SEO/PPC/social data in the same white-label dashboard. AgencyAnalytics
• prominara.com — Multi-brand workspace, branded client portal, white-label reports, scheduled reporting, citations, and competitive SoV. Prominara
• seerly.app — More evidence-oriented: visibility, SoV, sentiment, citations, and the underlying AI responses behind reported numbers. White-label agency reporting is supported. Seerly
• usecliro.com — Focuses heavily on automated client reporting: scheduled reports, white-labeling, SoV, citations, AI traffic, PDF/CSV and shareable links. Cliro
• aeovisor.com — Very agency-specific, with a portfolio dashboard, up to 10 brands on its agency plan, competitive SoV, white-label PDFs, API access and scheduled exports. AEOVisor

One particularly relevant distinction

If by "platform" you mean a system where your agency can give each client their own branded login/URL, rather than merely exporting a branded PDF, I'd narrow the list to:

Geneo → Prominara → Pondral → Asva AI

For example, Geneo explicitly supports a custom agency domain such as portal.your-agency.com, while Prominara offers a branded client portal. Geneo Prominara

If you mean "I want to resell this as my own AI visibility reporting product", there's an even more interesting category: 42A's white-label/partner offering is explicitly positioned as infrastructure that powers the platform while the agency owns the client-facing brand. 42A

My take

The market is still pretty early. Most tools are essentially AI visibility trackers + white-label reporting, rather than a truly polished "Agency AI Share of Voice OS".

If you're evaluating this as a potential product opportunity, I'd compare them on:

1. Definition of SoV — prompts, weighting, mentions vs. recommendations, competitor denominator.
2. AI engines — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, etc.
3. Evidence — whether the client can see the actual AI response/citation behind a metric.
4. White-label depth — PDF branding vs. genuinely white-labeled client portal/custom domain.
5. Multi-client management — portfolio view, permissions, client isolation.
6. API/webhooks — crucial if an agency wants to pipe metrics into its existing reporting stack.
7. Historical data — whether SoV can be trended reliably over months.
8. Methodology transparency — probably the biggest weakness across this category.

If you tell me whether you're shopping for a tool for your agency or exploring building one, I can give you a tighter competitive landscape with pricing, features, APIs, white-label capabilities, and which ones are actually closest to an AgencyAnalytics-style product for AI SoV.

If you mean "I want to resell this as my own AI visibility reporting product", there's an even more interesting category: 42A's white-label/partner offering is explicitly positioned as infrastructure that powers the platform while the agency owns the client-facing brand.

My take

Yes. There are now several platforms aimed specifically at agencies that need to report AI Share of Voice (SOV), AI visibility, and generative search performance to clients with white-label dashboards/reports. The category is often called AI visibility, GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) reporting, or AI search monitoring rather than just “AI SOV.” agencyanalytics.com

Some options:

For an agency, I’d evaluate them based on:

1. Client portal vs PDF reporting
   • If you want clients logging into “your product,” prioritize Geneo, Qwairy, Rankfender, or similar portal-first tools. www.qwairy.cogeneo.appagencyanalytics.com
   • If you mainly send monthly decks, AgencyAnalytics/Cliro-style reporting may be enough. www.qwairy.cowww.usecliro.comvisbee.aigeneo.appagencyanalytics.com

2. What counts as “share of voice”

Make sure it measures:

• % of tracked prompts where the client appears
• competitor mentions
• ranking/position inside AI answers
• citations/sources driving visibility
• sentiment/context of mentions

Different vendors use “SOV” differently.

3. AI engines covered

Check whether it tracks the engines your clients care about:

• ChatGPT
• Google AI Overviews
• Gemini
• Perplexity
• Claude
• Grok

Coverage varies significantly. geneo.appcitenzo.comagencyanalytics.com

If I were building an AI SEO/GEO agency offering, I’d shortlist:

• AgencyAnalytics → best if you already have SEO reporting clients.
• Geneo → best if you want a branded client portal experience.
• Qwairy → best if AI visibility itself is the core service.
• Rankfender/Citenzo/Cliro → worth testing for automated AI visibility reports. geneo.appagencyanalytics.com

There is still no universally dominant “AgencyAnalytics of AI Share of Voice” yet—the market is fairly early, and many agencies are stitching these into existing SEO reporting stacks. agencyanalytics.com

Yes. There’s now a fairly crowded category of GEO / AI-search visibility platforms specifically targeting agencies, and several offer white-label reporting.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — Probably closest to what you described. It offers agency-branded client portals, custom domains, logos/colors, and Share of Voice reporting across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. Geneo
• 42a.ai — Explicitly positioned as a white-label GEO platform: your agency owns the client relationship and clients see your branding. Includes AI Visibility Score and SOV across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. 42A
• searchable.com — More sophisticated agency workflow: prospect workspaces → client conversion → white-label reports → API. Their reporting includes SOV, visibility, competitive comparisons and narrative/action recommendations. Searchable
• usecliro.com — Strong if your priority is automated recurring reporting. It supports agency branding, SOV, citations, AI visibility, scheduled reports and shareable client links. Cliro
• rankfender.com — White-label reports + client portal + scheduled delivery, with competitive SOV and per-AI-system breakdowns. RankFender
• geo-ai-mention.com — Specifically markets multi-client, white-label GEO reporting, including branded dashboards, PDFs, API and integrations. LLM Search Console

One important distinction

There are really three levels of "white label":

1. White-label PDF/report — your logo on a monthly report.
2. Branded dashboard — client gets a live dashboard under your branding.
3. True white-label SaaS — custom domain, client login, your branding throughout, with the underlying vendor effectively invisible.

If you're asking because you're considering this as an agency product/service, I'd focus on #3. Geneo, 42A, GEO AI Mention, and some of the newer platforms are moving in that direction.

Also, Gumshoe is an interesting counterexample: it supports agency branding and reports, but explicitly says it does not currently offer a fully white-labeled client portal on your own domain; you'd need to build that layer using its API. gumshoe.ai

If you tell me roughly how many clients you want to manage (e.g. 10, 50, 500) and whether you need live client dashboards vs monthly PDF reports, I can narrow this down to the 3 best platforms and compare pricing, engines tracked, SOV methodology, API, white-label depth, and resale/agency economics.

Yes — there are now several platforms specifically aimed at agencies selling/reporting AI visibility (GEO/AEO) to clients, including share of voice, competitor visibility, citations, sentiment, and trend data.

Strongest options

If you're specifically looking for "Semrush/Looker Studio, but for AI share of voice"

I'd look particularly closely at Geneo, LLM Pulse, and 42A.

Geneo is unusually close to the product you're describing: agencies can put the client portal on their own domain, apply their logo/colors, and expose metrics such as AI Visibility, Share of Voice, mentions, citations, and sentiment through a client-facing dashboard. Its current agency plans start at $129/month. Geneo

LLM Pulse is more of a comprehensive agency platform. It has multi-client dashboards, white-labeling, competitor tracking, mention rate, sentiment, citation analysis, and a Looker Studio connector. That's interesting if the agency already has an established reporting stack. LLM Pulse

42A looks particularly interesting if you mean true white-label SaaS/reseller, rather than simply exporting a branded PDF. They explicitly describe the client experience as app.youragency.com/ai-visibility, with the agency owning the client relationship while 42A operates the underlying platform. 42A

Rankfender is worth considering if the primary product is the reporting layer: it offers white-label reports, client portals, scheduled delivery, competitive SOV, per-AI-system breakdowns, and shareable dashboards. RankFender

One important distinction

There are actually three different products hiding under "AI share of voice platform":

1. AI visibility tracker — measures how often your client appears in ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini/etc.
2. Agency reporting layer — turns that data into branded dashboards/PDFs for clients.
3. White-label SaaS/reseller platform — client logs into reports.youragency.com, sees your brand, and ideally never knows the underlying vendor.

If you're asking because you're considering building or buying one for an agency, #3 is the interesting category. 42A and Geneo appear closest to the "my agency gets its own AI visibility SaaS portal" model, while LLM Pulse is stronger as an underlying measurement/reporting platform.

I can also map out the 10–15 competitors in this market, their pricing, APIs, white-label capabilities, tracked AI engines, and which ones actually offer a client-facing dashboard vs. just branded PDFs.

Geneo is unusually close to the product you're describing: agencies can put the client portal on their own domain, apply their logo/colors, and expose metrics such as AI Visibility, Share of Voice, mentions, citations, and sentiment through a client-facing dashboard. Its current agency plans start at $129/month. geneo.app

LLM Pulse is more of a comprehensive agency platform. It has multi-client dashboards, white-labeling, competitor tracking, mention rate, sentiment, citation analysis, and a Looker Studio connector. That's interesting if the agency already has an established reporting stack. llmpulse.ai

42A looks particularly interesting if you mean true white-label SaaS/reseller, rather than simply exporting a branded PDF. They explicitly describe the client experience as app.youragency.com/ai-visibility, with the agency owning the client relationship while 42A operates the underlying platform.

Rankfender is worth considering if the primary product is the reporting layer: it offers white-label reports, client portals, scheduled delivery, competitive SOV, per-AI-system breakdowns, and shareable dashboards.

One important distinction

There are actually three different products hiding under "AI share of voice platform":

Yes. There’s now a fairly crowded category around AI search visibility / GEO reporting for agencies, and several platforms specifically support share of voice + multi-client management + white-label client reporting.

A few worth looking at:

• agencyanalytics.com — probably the most natural fit if you're already an agency using AgencyAnalytics. It lets you put AI visibility metrics alongside SEO/PPC/social reporting and white-label the reports. AgencyAnalytics
• citenzo.com — specifically positioned around agency white-label AI visibility reporting. Tracks AI visibility score, share of voice, competitors, citations, and before/after lift across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok and Google AI. Citenzo
• llmmetrix.com — strong agency orientation, with multi-client workspaces, white-label report links/PDFs and explicit share-of-voice vs competitors reporting. LLM Metrix
• rankfender.com — white-label reports, client portals, scheduled delivery, AI-system breakdowns and competitive SOV. RankFender
• geneo.app — particularly interesting if you want a true white-label client portal rather than just branded PDFs. It supports custom domain/logo and client-facing dashboards with visibility, SOV and mentions. Geneo
• zumihq.com — multi-client workspaces, agency branding, white-label reports and trend/citation tracking. Zumi
• searchable.com — more of an end-to-end agency GEO platform: prospect audits → client workspace → branded reporting → API/reporting integrations. Searchable

If your specific requirement is...

"I want a dashboard my client can log into that looks like my agency, showing AI SOV against competitors."

I'd shortlist Geneo, LLM Metrix, Rankfender, and Citenzo.

"I want to add AI SOV to my existing agency reporting stack."

I'd look first at AgencyAnalytics.

"I want to build AI visibility/GEO into a recurring agency service."

I'd investigate Searchable, LLM Metrix, or GetIntel because they're going beyond measurement into workflows and recommendations. Searchable LLM Metrix GetIntel

One important distinction: "AI share of voice" isn't yet a standardized metric. Different platforms calculate it differently—e.g. share of tracked answers/mentions versus competitor brands—so I'd compare their methodology before putting the number into client contracts or executive reports.

If you're evaluating this as a potential product/business opportunity, I can also map out the current players, their pricing, SOV methodology, white-label capabilities, APIs, and where there appears to be an underserved gap.

Yes. There are now several platforms specifically aimed at agencies selling/reporting AI Search Visibility / GEO, including share of voice, competitor comparisons, citations, and white-label client reporting.

Strongest options

• agencyanalytics.com — Probably the most interesting if you already use AgencyAnalytics. It lets you combine AI visibility metrics with SEO/PPC/social reporting, customize dashboards, and white-label the reports. AgencyAnalytics
• seerly.app — Built specifically around agencies. Tracks visibility, sentiment, citations and share of voice against competitors, with branded PDF/web reports and multi-client management. Seerly
• towergeo.com — More purpose-built as an agency platform: multi-client dashboard, competitive benchmarking, white-label reports, and client-facing branded dashboards/custom domains. Tower GEO
• geneo.app — Particularly interesting if you want a true white-label client portal. Clients can log into a dashboard on your agency's domain and see your branding, with visibility, mentions, citations and SOV. Geneo
• searchable.com — Agency-oriented AI visibility platform with pitch workspaces, client workspaces, white-label reports, share-of-voice metrics and reporting workflows. Searchable
• peec.ai — Interesting if you want to build the client-facing layer yourself. It provides a Looker/Data Studio connector, so you can create your own branded dashboard per client, plus API/CSV access. Peec AI
• citenzo.com — More lightweight and specifically focused on turning AI visibility/SOV into white-label agency reports. Citenzo

If you're specifically asking for "Agency-branded SOV dashboard that the client logs into"

I'd narrow it to:

One important distinction: "AI share of voice" isn't yet a standardized metric in the way Google Search Console impressions or traditional SEO share-of-voice metrics are. Different platforms calculate it differently—e.g. mention rate, weighted position, visibility across prompts, competitor ranking, or some combination. So I'd compare the underlying methodology and raw AI responses, not just the headline SOV percentage.

If you're evaluating this as a potential product/category to build, rather than just looking for software to use, there's actually an interesting gap here: a lot of these tools are primarily AI visibility trackers with agency features, rather than a truly agency-native client reporting/BI layer for AI SOV.

Yes. There’s now a fairly crowded category around AI visibility / GEO reporting for agencies, and several platforms specifically support share of voice + multi-client management + white-label dashboards/reports.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — particularly close to what you're describing. It offers agency-branded client portals, custom domains, Share of Voice, mentions, citations, and client seats. Agency pricing shown currently starts at $129/month. Geneo
• zumihq.com — multi-client workspaces, Share of Voice/mention-rate reporting, white-label exports, agency branding, and tracking across up to nine AI engines. Zumi
• 42a.ai — explicitly positioned as a white-label GEO platform where the agency gets its own branded AI-visibility dashboard and client experience. 42A
• rankfender.com — strong if reporting is the primary requirement: white-label reports, competitive Share of Voice, per-AI-system breakdowns, scheduled delivery, PDF and client portals. RankFender
• prominara.com — white-label reports, branded client portal/custom domain, multi-brand workspaces, Share of Voice, and API access for agencies building their own reporting layer. Prominara
• qwairy.co — multi-client GEO analytics, competitive Share of Voice, white-label reports, and Looker Studio integration. Qwairy
• citenzo.com — more focused on turning AI visibility into a straightforward client-reporting metric: visibility score, Share of Voice, competitors, citations, and before/after lift. Citenzo

If you're thinking about this as a product opportunity

The interesting distinction is "AI visibility tracker" vs. "agency reporting infrastructure."

Most of these tools are still primarily selling the former. The opportunity for an agency-oriented product is something like:

Connect your agency → add clients → automatically generate a branded AI Share of Voice dashboard for every client → send monthly/QBR reports → show changes against competitors and attribute improvements to agency work.

The core dashboard could be extremely simple:

Then layer on "what changed / why / what should we do next?" rather than making the client interpret raw AI-monitoring data.

So yes, the market exists, but it's still relatively early. If you're asking because you're considering building an agency-facing SaaS around AI Share of Voice, I can also map out the current competitors, their pricing/features, and where I think the underserved wedge is.

Yes. There’s now a fairly mature category around AI search visibility / GEO reporting for agencies, and several platforms specifically support share of voice + white-label client reporting.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — Probably closest to what you're describing. It has agency workspaces, white-label client portals on your domain, Share of Voice, mentions, citations, sentiment, and tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. Geneo
• citenzo.com — Very focused on the reporting layer. Specifically offers AI Visibility Score, Share of Voice, competitor comparisons, before/after lift, and white-label reports. Its site says client workspaces/shareable dashboards are rolling out, though, so I'd verify the current portal functionality. Citenzo
• agencyanalytics.com — Interesting if you want AI SOV alongside conventional SEO/PPC/GA4 reporting. Its AI Tracker covers ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, and the reporting is white-label. AgencyAnalytics
• seerly.app — Tracks visibility, sentiment, citations and competitive share of voice, with agency-branded reports and the underlying AI responses available as evidence. Seerly
• zumihq.com — Built specifically around multi-client agency management, with isolated client workspaces, white-label reports, SOV, trends and citation tracking. Zumi
• prominara.com — More of a full GEO platform, with branded client portal + custom domain + white-label reports + API, including SOV and citation metrics. Prominara
• rankfender.com — Specifically emphasizes automated white-label AI visibility reports, competitive SOV, per-AI-system breakdowns, scheduled delivery and client portals. RankFender
• searchable.com — Agency-oriented AI search platform with multi-client dashboards, white-label reports, SOV, citation data and API access. Searchable Searchable

If you're evaluating this as an agency product

I'd separate them into three buckets:

The interesting gap: if by "AI share of voice" you mean a very specific metric such as:

Across 500 commercially important prompts, what % of AI answers mention my client vs. competitors, broken down by model, geography, prompt category, citation source, and month-over-month change?

then the market is still relatively young. Most platforms call something "Share of Voice," but the methodology varies considerably—number of mentions, answer-level presence, position, weighted visibility, citation share, etc.

If you're thinking about building/buying this for an agency, I can also do a deeper comparison of the 10–15 leading platforms, their pricing, exact SOV methodology, white-label capabilities, API access, and which ones let you resell it under your own brand.

Yes — there are now several platforms specifically aimed at agencies selling/reporting AI search visibility (GEO/AEO) to clients, including share of voice, mentions, citations, competitors, and white-label dashboards/reports.

A few worth looking at:

• geneo.app — Probably one of the closest matches. It offers white-label client portals, custom domain/logo/branding, and reports including Share of Voice, mentions, citations, and sentiment across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. Geneo
• agencyanalytics.com — More interesting if you want AI visibility incorporated into an agency's existing SEO/PPC reporting stack. It supports white-label reporting and tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. AgencyAnalytics
• llmpulse.ai — Built for SEO agencies, with white-label dashboards, share of voice, mention rate, position-weighted visibility, citations, and a Looker Studio template. LLM Pulse
• towergeo.com — Specifically agency-oriented: multi-client monitoring plus white-label PDF and live dashboard reporting. It tracks visibility, sentiment, citation frequency, and competitive positioning. Tower GEO
• rankfender.com — Strong emphasis on automated agency reporting: white-label dashboards, client portals, scheduled reports, competitive SoV, and integration with GSC/GA4. RankFender
• dabarank.com — Multi-client agency workflow with competitor share of voice, daily AI checks, and white-label PDFs. DabaRank
• citenzo.com — More narrowly focused on turning AI visibility into an agency reporting layer: score, SoV, competitors, and before/after lift, with white-label reports. Citenzo

If you're thinking about this as an agency product

I'd separate the market into three categories:

The interesting thing is that "AI Share of Voice" is becoming a fairly standardized agency KPI: essentially, across a fixed set of buyer prompts, what percentage of the brands/models' visibility goes to the client versus competitors? Several of these products are explicitly positioning SoV this way. LLM Metrix DabaRank

If you're asking because you're considering building something in this space, there is still an interesting gap: most tools seem focused on tracking AI visibility, whereas an agency-facing product could own the entire workflow of "monthly AI visibility report → explain the change → show competitor wins/losses → recommend work → prove the next month's lift." That looks less commoditized to me.

Yes — there’s now a fairly crowded category around AI Search Visibility / GEO reporting for agencies, and several platforms specifically support share of voice (SoV), multi-client management, and white-label dashboards/reports.

Strongest options I’d look at

A particularly interesting one is AgencyAnalytics because it isn't just an AI visibility product: its AI Tracker can put AI visibility alongside Google Analytics, Google Ads, Search Console, SEO, social, etc., inside the same client dashboard. AgencyAnalytics

If you want a dedicated GEO product, Geneo, Tower GEO, Qwairy, and Outercite are closer to what you're describing. For example, Geneo explicitly offers a client portal on the agency's domain with the agency's logo/branding and Share of Voice metrics. Geneo

One important distinction

There are actually two products hiding inside your question:

1. AI visibility measurement

• % of prompts where client appears
• Share of Voice vs. competitors
• position/rank in AI answers
• mentions
• citations
• sentiment
• ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Perplexity vs. Google AI, etc.
• Agency reporting infrastructure

• multiple client workspaces
• your logo/domain
• client login
• automated monthly reports
• custom metrics
• API / Looker Studio integration
• potentially your own pricing/margin

The second is where the market is still less mature. For example, Peec AI takes a more flexible approach: agencies can build branded Looker Studio dashboards from its data, while Gumshoe explicitly says it doesn't currently provide a fully branded client portal and expects agencies to build that layer through its API. Peec AI Gumshoe AI

If you're evaluating this as a product opportunity

There is definitely competition, but I wouldn't conclude that the market is solved.

The interesting gap is potentially "AgencyAnalytics for AI search" rather than another GEO tracker:

Agency logs in → adds 50 clients → every client gets a white-label AI Share of Voice dashboard → automatically incorporated into the agency's existing SEO reporting → client sees exactly what changed and why.

That is more compelling than simply showing an AI visibility score.

There are already products moving toward this: Qwairy, for example, emphasizes portfolio-level dashboards and isolated client workspaces, while Rankfender combines AI SoV with other marketing data and automated reports. Qwairy RankFender

If you're considering building this, I can also map out the current competitors feature-by-feature (pricing, APIs, white-label domains, client portals, engines tracked, SoV methodology, Looker Studio, etc.) and identify where there still seems to be a gap.

Yes. A few platforms are emerging specifically for agencies selling AI visibility / Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) services with share of voice (SOV), competitor tracking, and white-label client dashboards. The category is still young, so vendors often call this AI visibility, AI search visibility, AI presence, AEO, or GEO reporting rather than “AI share of voice.” AgenticSEO Asva AI

Some options:

A few things I’d evaluate before choosing:

• Definition of SOV: Some tools count brand mentions; others measure “recommended/selected” placement in AI answers. Those produce very different numbers.
• Engines covered: Check whether it tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Claude, etc. Geneo Asva AI
• Evidence layer: For client retention, reports that show the actual prompts, AI responses, and cited sources are usually more defensible than a single score. GEO Score Seerly
• Client portal vs PDF only: If you’re packaging this as a recurring agency service, a login portal under your domain is usually stronger than monthly exports. Geneo Qwairy

If you’re building this into an SEO/PR/content agency retainer, I’d shortlist:

1. Geneo — strongest “productized service” feel for agencies. Geneo
2. Citenzo — focused specifically on white-label AI visibility reporting. Citenzo
3. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — best if you already run client reporting there. AgencyAnalytics

I can also compare these by pricing, API availability, number of AI engines tracked, and resale potential if you’re looking to launch this as an agency offering.

Yes. There are now several platforms specifically aimed at agencies that need to sell/report AI Share of Voice (SOV), AI visibility, GEO/AEO performance, and ChatGPT/AI search presence to clients with white-label dashboards. The category is still emerging, but these are some of the more relevant options:

Typical metrics these platforms report:

• AI Share of Voice — percentage of tracked prompts where a brand is mentioned vs competitors
• AI Visibility Score — overall presence across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, etc.
• Mention frequency
• Citation/source tracking — which websites AI engines rely on
• Sentiment
• Competitor benchmarking
• Prompt-level wins/losses
• Trend lines over time towergeo.com

If you’re an agency, I’d evaluate them based on a few practical questions:

1. Can clients log in?

A PDF report is less defensible than a live branded portal.

2. Can you create multiple client workspaces?

Important if you’re packaging this as a monthly retainer.

3. Does it track competitors?

SOV without competitive context is usually a weak client metric.

4. Can you export methodology/explain the score?

Clients will eventually ask “how is this calculated?”

5. Does it support your sales motion?

Some tools are better for internal SEO teams; others are built specifically for agencies.

For an agency trying to launch an “AI visibility monitoring” retainer, I’d shortlist:

• Geneo or Tower GEO for a dedicated GEO/AI-search service
• AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker if you already run client reporting there
• Rankfender / Zumi / ChatFeatured if white-label reporting is the core product you’re selling geneo.app

I can also help compare these by pricing, API access, number of tracked prompts, and whether they can be resold as a SaaS-like client portal.

Yes — this is becoming a distinct GEO/AEO (generative/answer-engine optimization) reporting category, and there are several platforms specifically targeting agencies.

Strongest options I found

A particularly close match to what you're describing is Geneo: it explicitly offers a client portal on an agency domain, agency branding, Share of Voice, visibility, mentions, and sentiment. geneo.app

LLM Pulse is also interesting if your goal is to turn this into a recurring client service: it supports multi-client dashboards, white-label branding, custom domains, and Looker Studio integration. llmpulse.ai

Citlyze goes a little deeper into the "prove the result" side: it tracks Share of Voice and competitor visibility while retaining the underlying prompts, answers, and sources as an evidence trail. www.citlyze.com

One interesting thing about the market

There seems to be a gap between:

AI visibility tracker → "Here's your score"

and

Agency reporting platform → "Here's your branded client dashboard, competitive SoV, trend, citations, evidence, recommendations, and ROI."

Most of the current products are still fairly GEO-tool-centric rather than being a true agency reporting layer analogous to what tools like AgencyAnalytics/DataBox did for traditional marketing.

If you're asking because you're considering building one, I think there's an interesting opportunity around a platform that lets an agency combine:

• AI Share of Voice
• competitor movement
• prompts/questions tracked
• ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Claude / Google AI visibility
• citations & cited domains
• sentiment
• "wins/losses" since last month
• client-specific KPI/ROI
• automated monthly narrative
• fully white-labeled client portal
• agency domain
• API / Looker Studio integration
• one-click monthly report

The particularly valuable metric may be "SoV change attributable to the agency's work", rather than simply AI visibility. Several newer platforms are already moving in that direction with before/after measurement. citenzo.com

If you tell me whether you're shopping for a tool or thinking about building this, I can map the current competitors, pricing, APIs, and the specific gap I think is still underserved.

Yes. There are now several platforms specifically aimed at agencies that want to sell AI visibility / AI Share of Voice (SOV) as a client-facing service with white-label reporting.

The strongest options I found:

The ones I'd look at first

1. Geneo — probably closest to what you're describing.
It explicitly offers a client portal on the agency's own domain, agency branding, live dashboards, Share of Voice, mentions, citations, and platform breakdowns. Geneo

2. Rankfender — strongest if reporting automation matters.
It has live client dashboards, competitive SOV, historical trends, scheduled reports, PDF export, shareable links, and per-client branding. RankFender

3. AgencyAnalytics — strongest if you want AI SOV alongside conventional marketing reporting.
Its AI Tracker can put AI visibility/SOV next to GSC, GA4, PPC, social, etc., so the client sees one overall marketing dashboard rather than a standalone GEO tool. AgencyAnalytics

4. Asva AI — interesting if you're building an actual AEO service.
It is explicitly designed around agencies, with multi-client workspaces, white-label dashboards, custom domains, 9+ AI engines, competitive benchmarking, and scheduled reporting. Asvaai

There's also a newer crop of purpose-built agency products such as Citenzo, which is particularly focused on turning AI visibility/SOV into a white-label monthly deliverable. Its current agency plan advertises up to 30 client projects, SOV/gap analysis, multiple AI engines, and white-label reports. Citenzo

If you're thinking about building this

There's actually an interesting gap here.

Most of these products are essentially "AI visibility tracker + agency reporting." The core metric is usually something like:

AI Share of Voice = percentage of relevant AI answers in which the client's brand appears, relative to competitors

Then they layer on:

• visibility/mention rate
• competitor SOV
• sentiment
• citations/sources
• engine-by-engine performance
• prompt/topic performance
• historical movement
• recommendations

What seems less mature is a true agency operating system for AI SOV: white-label client portal + customizable KPI definitions + automated monthly narratives + benchmarks by industry + client-specific prompt sets + integration with the agency's existing SEO/GA4/CRM reporting.

If that's what you're evaluating, I can also map out the current competitive landscape and tell you which of these are closest to a "Semrush/AgencyAnalytics for AI SOV," including pricing, APIs, white-label depth, and gaps in each.

2. Rankfender — strongest if reporting automation matters.
It has live client dashboards, competitive SOV, historical trends, scheduled reports, PDF export, shareable links, and per-client branding. RankFender

3. AgencyAnalytics — strongest if you want AI SOV alongside conventional marketing reporting.
Its AI Tracker can put AI visibility/SOV next to GSC, GA4, PPC, social, etc., so the client sees one overall marketing dashboard rather than a standalone GEO tool. AgencyAnalytics

4. Asva AI — interesting if you're building an actual AEO service.
It is explicitly designed around agencies, with multi-client workspaces, white-label dashboards, custom domains, 9+ AI engines, competitive benchmarking, and scheduled reporting. asvaai.com

There's also a newer crop of purpose-built agency products such as Citenzo, which is particularly focused on turning AI visibility/SOV into a white-label monthly deliverable. Its current agency plan advertises up to 30 client projects, SOV/gap analysis, multiple AI engines, and white-label reports. citenzo.com

If you're thinking about building this

There's actually an interesting gap here.

Most of these products are essentially "AI visibility tracker + agency reporting." The core metric is usually something like:

AI Share of Voice = percentage of relevant AI answers in which the client's brand appears, relative to competitors

Then they layer on:

Yes. There’s now a fairly crowded category of AI search visibility / GEO platforms built specifically for agencies, including white-label client dashboards and reports.

A few worth looking at:

The closest matches to what you're describing

Geneo looks particularly close: agencies can put the dashboard on their own domain, use their logo/colors, and show clients metrics like AI Share of Voice, mentions, citations, visibility and sentiment across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI. geneo.app

LLM Pulse is another strong fit if you want a more conventional agency SaaS model. It explicitly offers white-label client portals, custom domains, multi-client projects, Share of Voice, citations, sentiment, plus a Looker Studio connector. llmpulse.ai

Searchable is interesting if you want the platform to be more than reporting: it combines prospect audits, client workspaces, white-label reports, competitive visibility and API access. www.searchable.com

Seerly is worth investigating if your priority is defensible client reporting. It says it tracks Share of Voice against defined competitors and lets you drill down to the underlying AI responses/citations behind the metric. seerly.app

One important distinction

I'd separate these into two categories:

1. "SEO reporting, but for AI"

Track prompts → mentions → citations → visibility/SOV → send branded report.

2. "Agency AI visibility operating system"

Prospect audits → client dashboard → SOV tracking → recommendations → content fixes → reporting → API.

The second category is probably more interesting if you're thinking about selling AI Share of Voice as a recurring agency service rather than simply adding another metric to an existing SEO report.

Also, Gumshoe is an interesting counterexample: it has strong agency reporting and an API, but explicitly says it doesn't currently offer a fully white-labeled client portal. gumshoe.ai

If you're asking because you're considering building a platform in this space, I can also map out the competitive landscape—who has the best white-label UX, what metrics they expose, pricing, APIs, and where there's still a gap in the market.

Yes. There’s now a fairly mature category of AI search / GEO visibility platforms specifically designed for agencies, including white-label client dashboards and reporting.

A few worth looking at:

LLM Pulse looks particularly close to what you're describing: it explicitly positions itself as an agency platform where you create a project per client, track AI visibility, sentiment, citations and share of voice, and expose it through a white-labeled client portal with your agency's logo, colors and custom domain. It also supports Looker Studio, API, CSV and Excel reporting. llmpulse.ai

LLM Pulse agency platform

Geneo is another strong fit if the client-facing portal is the important part. Its agency product shows a custom-domain client portal and metrics such as 42.8% Share of Voice, mentions and citations, with agency branding applied throughout. geneo.app

Geneo for agencies

Tower GEO is explicitly built around the agency use case: multiple client brands, competitor benchmarking, sentiment/citation tracking, and white-label live dashboards and PDFs. towergeo.com

Tower GEO

And AgencyAnalytics is interesting if you don't want a standalone GEO reporting tool. Its AI Tracker is designed to put AI visibility metrics alongside SEO, PPC, GA4, Search Console, etc., inside the same client reporting environment, with white-label reports. agencyanalytics.com

AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker

If you're evaluating this as an agency product

I'd specifically compare these capabilities rather than just "does it track ChatGPT":

1. Share of voice methodology — is SOV based on mentions, answer position, citations, or some weighted combination?
2. Prompt-level evidence — can you click a 37% SOV number and see the actual AI answers that generated it?
3. Competitor SOV — essential for making the metric meaningful to clients.
4. Engine coverage — ChatGPT + Gemini + Perplexity at minimum; increasingly Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Copilot, etc.
5. White-label client portal — custom domain is much better than merely putting your logo on a PDF.
6. Historical data — clients will want "SOV went from 18% → 31%" rather than a snapshot.
7. API / Looker Studio — important if you already have an agency-wide reporting stack.
8. Multi-client economics — pricing based on prompts/runs can get expensive as your client base scales.

One particularly interesting option is Searchable, because it combines prospect/pitch workspaces with retained-client reporting and white-label reports, rather than treating reporting as an afterthought. www.searchable.com

Searchable agency platform

If you're thinking about building or selling this yourself, I can also map out the current landscape—e.g. the 10–15 platforms, their pricing, SOV methodology, white-label capabilities, API access, and where the gaps are. That would make it much easier to see whether there's actually an underserved agency segment.

Yes. There are now several platforms specifically aimed at agencies selling AI visibility / GEO / AEO reporting to clients, including white-label dashboards and share-of-voice metrics.

A few worth looking at:

The interesting distinction

If by "AI share of voice" you mean something like:

Of all the times ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini answer our tracked buyer questions, what percentage of the answers mention our client vs. competitors?

then LLM Pulse, Geneo, Spyglasses, Zumi, and Qwairy look particularly aligned.

For example, LLM Pulse says it tracks share of voice, mentions, citations, sentiment, and AI visibility across multiple AI systems, while providing white-label dashboards and a Looker Studio connector. llmpulse.ai

Geneo's agency product is even more explicitly positioned as a client portal under the agency's domain, with the dashboard showing things such as 42.8% Share of Voice, mentions, citations, and platform breakdowns. geneo.appllmpulse.ai

If you're thinking about building/buying one

I'd separate the market into three categories:

1. True white-label GEO platform
LLM Pulse, Geneo, Tower GEO, Zumi, Qwairy.

2. Existing agency reporting platform adding AI visibility
AgencyAnalytics, AgencyReportr.

3. AI visibility data provider that you put into your own dashboard
Gumshoe is an example: it offers API/JSON/CSV and shareable reports, but explicitly says it doesn't currently offer a fully white-label client portal. gumshoe.ai

That third category is particularly interesting if you're considering building your own agency-facing product.

If your goal is specifically "I want to resell this to 20–100 clients under my agency's brand, with each client seeing SOV, competitors, citations, prompts, and historical trends", I'd shortlist LLM Pulse, Geneo, Spyglasses, and Qwairy and compare their pricing/API/custom-domain capabilities. llmpulse.ai

Yes. This is now a fairly defined category—usually called AI visibility, GEO/AEO tracking, or AI search share of voice. Several platforms are explicitly built for agencies and offer white-label client reporting.

Strongest options

LLM Pulse is probably the first one I'd investigate. It specifically supports agencies with white-label client portals, unlimited seats, multi-client projects, custom domains, and metrics including visibility score, mentions, citations, sentiment, and share of voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews. It also has a Looker Studio connector and API. llmpulse.aillmpulse.ai

LLM Pulse agency platform

Geneo is another particularly close match to what you're describing. Its agency product explicitly shows Share of Voice, mentions, citations, platform breakdowns, and a white-labeled client portal with the agency's logo, colors, and custom domain. llmpulse.aigeneo.appllmpulse.ai

Geneo for Agencies

Prominara is worth looking at if you're thinking beyond a standard SaaS dashboard. It offers branded client portals, white-label reports, multi-brand workspaces, and API access, so an agency can potentially integrate AI visibility data into its existing reporting infrastructure. prominara.com

Prominara

One important distinction

If by "AI share of voice" you mean something like:

Of all relevant questions people ask ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini about this category, what percentage of AI answers mention my client's brand vs. competitors?

then yes, these tools are measuring essentially that metric. LLM Pulse, for example, describes SOV as part of its AI visibility scoring, while AI Brand Report explicitly benchmarks brands against competitors across AI engines. llmpulse.ai

The more sophisticated platforms also let you drill into which prompts produced the SOV, which competitors appeared, the position of the brand, sentiment, and which sources/citations influenced the answer. That's important because a naked "42% AI SOV" number can be difficult to defend to a client.

If you're considering building/buying one

I'd evaluate them on these 8 things:

1. Prompt-level evidence — can you show the actual AI answers behind the metric?
2. Competitive SOV — client vs. named competitors.
3. Platform segmentation — ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Perplexity vs. Google AI.
4. Position weighting — #1 recommendation should count more than a passing mention.
5. Citation tracking — what content/PR is causing the visibility?
6. Custom domain + client login — e.g. ai.youragency.com.
7. API/Looker Studio — so you're not trapped in their dashboard.
8. Historical consistency — methodology needs to remain stable enough that "42% → 51%" actually means something.

One particularly interesting alternative is rank.ai, which offers an embeddable AI-visibility widget specifically for agencies, meaning you can put the metrics inside an existing client portal rather than sending clients to another SaaS product. www.rank.ai

rank.ai Agent Analytics

If you're evaluating this as a product opportunity, rather than simply looking for software to use, there's actually an interesting gap here: most of these products are GEO monitoring tools that happen to have agency reporting, whereas a true "AI SOV reporting layer for agencies" could be positioned much more like Looker Studio/AgencyAnalytics—agnostic data ingestion + branded client dashboards + automated monthly reporting.

Yes. This has become a distinct category over the last year: AI visibility / AI share of voice (SOV) / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platforms. Several now target agencies specifically with multi-client management and white-label reporting.

The strongest options are:

What agencies are reporting

The common KPIs now include:

• AI Share of Voice
• Brand mention frequency
• Competitor comparison
• Citation share (how often AI cites your site)
• Platform breakdown (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews)
• Sentiment
• Visibility trend over time
• Top prompts monitored
• Source domains driving AI citations

Most generate PDF reports plus live dashboards.

Where the market still has gaps

Interestingly, most tools stop at "visibility."

Few combine:

• AI Share of Voice
• Organic SEO
• Paid search
• Web analytics
• CRM leads
• Revenue attribution

into a single executive dashboard.

There's also very little around:

• benchmarking by industry
• forecasting AI visibility
• tying AI citations to pipeline or revenue
• executive-friendly scorecards for CMOs

If you're thinking about building one

There is still room for a stronger agency platform, especially one that feels like "Looker Studio for AI visibility."

A compelling feature set would be:

• Fully white-labeled client portals
• Custom domain (clients.youragency.com)
• Multi-tenant architecture
• Scheduled executive reports
• Live AI SOV tracking
• Prompt library management
• Competitor monitoring
• Slack/email alerts for visibility changes
• API + Looker/Power BI connectors
• Billing by client workspace
• Role-based permissions

That moves beyond being another monitoring tool and becomes the reporting infrastructure agencies can standardize on.

My impression is that the market is still early. Many of these platforms launched agency features only recently, and several appear to be converging on the same core feature set. rankfender.com

If your question is motivated by a startup idea, I'd say "white-label AI visibility reporting for agencies" is no longer an open greenfield. The bigger opportunity now is differentiation—for example:

• becoming the Databox or AgencyAnalytics for AI search,
• integrating AI visibility with broader marketing reporting,
• or offering revenue attribution and client-facing insights that go beyond simple AI share-of-voice metrics.

Yes. This has become a distinct category over the last year: AI visibility / AI share of voice (SOV) / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platforms. Several now target agencies specifically with multi-client management and white-label reporting.

The strongest options are:

What agencies are reporting

The common KPIs now include:

• AI Share of Voice
• Brand mention frequency
• Competitor comparison
• Citation share (how often AI cites your site)
• Platform breakdown (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews)
• Sentiment
• Visibility trend over time
• Top prompts monitored
• Source domains driving AI citations

Most generate PDF reports plus live dashboards.

Where the market still has gaps

Interestingly, most tools stop at "visibility."

Few combine:

• AI Share of Voice
• Organic SEO
• Paid search
• Web analytics
• CRM leads
• Revenue attribution

into a single executive dashboard.

There's also very little around:

• benchmarking by industry
• forecasting AI visibility
• tying AI citations to pipeline or revenue
• executive-friendly scorecards for CMOs

If you're thinking about building one

There is still room for a stronger agency platform, especially one that feels like "Looker Studio for AI visibility."

A compelling feature set would be:

• Fully white-labeled client portals
• Custom domain (clients.youragency.com)
• Multi-tenant architecture
• Scheduled executive reports
• Live AI SOV tracking
• Prompt library management
• Competitor monitoring
• Slack/email alerts for visibility changes
• API + Looker/Power BI connectors
• Billing by client workspace
• Role-based permissions

That moves beyond being another monitoring tool and becomes the reporting infrastructure agencies can standardize on.

My impression is that the market is still early. Many of these platforms launched agency features only recently, and several appear to be converging on the same core feature set. rankfender.com

If your question is motivated by a startup idea, I'd say "white-label AI visibility reporting for agencies" is no longer an open greenfield. The bigger opportunity now is differentiation—for example:

• becoming the Databox or AgencyAnalytics for AI search,
• integrating AI visibility with broader marketing reporting,
• or offering revenue attribution and client-facing insights that go beyond simple AI share-of-voice metrics.

Yes. This has become a distinct category over the last year: AI visibility / AI share of voice (SOV) / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platforms. Several now target agencies specifically with multi-client management and white-label reporting.

The strongest options are:

What agencies are reporting

The common KPIs now include:

• AI Share of Voice
• Brand mention frequency
• Competitor comparison
• Citation share (how often AI cites your site)
• Platform breakdown (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews)
• Sentiment
• Visibility trend over time
• Top prompts monitored
• Source domains driving AI citations

Most generate PDF reports plus live dashboards.

Where the market still has gaps

Interestingly, most tools stop at "visibility."

Few combine:

• AI Share of Voice
• Organic SEO
• Paid search
• Web analytics
• CRM leads
• Revenue attribution

into a single executive dashboard.

There's also very little around:

• benchmarking by industry
• forecasting AI visibility
• tying AI citations to pipeline or revenue
• executive-friendly scorecards for CMOs

If you're thinking about building one

There is still room for a stronger agency platform, especially one that feels like "Looker Studio for AI visibility."

A compelling feature set would be:

• Fully white-labeled client portals
• Custom domain (clients.youragency.com)
• Multi-tenant architecture
• Scheduled executive reports
• Live AI SOV tracking
• Prompt library management
• Competitor monitoring
• Slack/email alerts for visibility changes
• API + Looker/Power BI connectors
• Billing by client workspace
• Role-based permissions

That moves beyond being another monitoring tool and becomes the reporting infrastructure agencies can standardize on.

My impression is that the market is still early. Many of these platforms launched agency features only recently, and several appear to be converging on the same core feature set. rankfender.com

If your question is motivated by a startup idea, I'd say "white-label AI visibility reporting for agencies" is no longer an open greenfield. The bigger opportunity now is differentiation—for example:

• becoming the Databox or AgencyAnalytics for AI search,
• integrating AI visibility with broader marketing reporting,
• or offering revenue attribution and client-facing insights that go beyond simple AI share-of-voice metrics.

Yes. This has become a distinct category over the last year: AI visibility / AI share of voice (SOV) / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platforms. Several now target agencies specifically with multi-client management and white-label reporting.

The strongest options are:

What agencies are reporting

The common KPIs now include:

• AI Share of Voice
• Brand mention frequency
• Competitor comparison
• Citation share (how often AI cites your site)
• Platform breakdown (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews)
• Sentiment
• Visibility trend over time
• Top prompts monitored
• Source domains driving AI citations

Most generate PDF reports plus live dashboards.

Where the market still has gaps

Interestingly, most tools stop at "visibility."

Few combine:

• AI Share of Voice
• Organic SEO
• Paid search
• Web analytics
• CRM leads
• Revenue attribution

into a single executive dashboard.

There's also very little around:

• benchmarking by industry
• forecasting AI visibility
• tying AI citations to pipeline or revenue
• executive-friendly scorecards for CMOs

If you're thinking about building one

There is still room for a stronger agency platform, especially one that feels like "Looker Studio for AI visibility."

A compelling feature set would be:

• Fully white-labeled client portals
• Custom domain (clients.youragency.com)
• Multi-tenant architecture
• Scheduled executive reports
• Live AI SOV tracking
• Prompt library management
• Competitor monitoring
• Slack/email alerts for visibility changes
• API + Looker/Power BI connectors
• Billing by client workspace
• Role-based permissions

That moves beyond being another monitoring tool and becomes the reporting infrastructure agencies can standardize on.

My impression is that the market is still early. Many of these platforms launched agency features only recently, and several appear to be converging on the same core feature set. rankfender.com

If your question is motivated by a startup idea, I'd say "white-label AI visibility reporting for agencies" is no longer an open greenfield. The bigger opportunity now is differentiation—for example:

• becoming the Databox or AgencyAnalytics for AI search,
• integrating AI visibility with broader marketing reporting,
• or offering revenue attribution and client-facing insights that go beyond simple AI share-of-voice metrics.

Yes. This has become a distinct category over the last year: AI visibility / AI share of voice (SOV) / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platforms. Several now target agencies specifically with multi-client management and white-label reporting.

The strongest options are:

What agencies are reporting

The common KPIs now include:

• AI Share of Voice
• Brand mention frequency
• Competitor comparison
• Citation share (how often AI cites your site)
• Platform breakdown (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews)
• Sentiment
• Visibility trend over time
• Top prompts monitored
• Source domains driving AI citations

Most generate PDF reports plus live dashboards.

Where the market still has gaps

Interestingly, most tools stop at "visibility."

Few combine:

• AI Share of Voice
• Organic SEO
• Paid search
• Web analytics
• CRM leads
• Revenue attribution

into a single executive dashboard.

There's also very little around:

• benchmarking by industry
• forecasting AI visibility
• tying AI citations to pipeline or revenue
• executive-friendly scorecards for CMOs

If you're thinking about building one

There is still room for a stronger agency platform, especially one that feels like "Looker Studio for AI visibility."

A compelling feature set would be:

• Fully white-labeled client portals
• Custom domain (clients.youragency.com)
• Multi-tenant architecture
• Scheduled executive reports
• Live AI SOV tracking
• Prompt library management
• Competitor monitoring
• Slack/email alerts for visibility changes
• API + Looker/Power BI connectors
• Billing by client workspace
• Role-based permissions

That moves beyond being another monitoring tool and becomes the reporting infrastructure agencies can standardize on.

My impression is that the market is still early. Many of these platforms launched agency features only recently, and several appear to be converging on the same core feature set. rankfender.com

If your question is motivated by a startup idea, I'd say "white-label AI visibility reporting for agencies" is no longer an open greenfield. The bigger opportunity now is differentiation—for example:

• becoming the Databox or AgencyAnalytics for AI search,
• integrating AI visibility with broader marketing reporting,
• or offering revenue attribution and client-facing insights that go beyond simple AI share-of-voice metrics.

Yes. This has become a distinct category over the last year: AI visibility / AI share of voice (SOV) / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platforms. Several now target agencies specifically with multi-client management and white-label reporting.

The strongest options are:

What agencies are reporting

The common KPIs now include:

• AI Share of Voice
• Brand mention frequency
• Competitor comparison
• Citation share (how often AI cites your site)
• Platform breakdown (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews)
• Sentiment
• Visibility trend over time
• Top prompts monitored
• Source domains driving AI citations

Most generate PDF reports plus live dashboards.

Where the market still has gaps

Interestingly, most tools stop at "visibility."

Few combine:

• AI Share of Voice
• Organic SEO
• Paid search
• Web analytics
• CRM leads
• Revenue attribution

into a single executive dashboard.

There's also very little around:

• benchmarking by industry
• forecasting AI visibility
• tying AI citations to pipeline or revenue
• executive-friendly scorecards for CMOs

If you're thinking about building one

There is still room for a stronger agency platform, especially one that feels like "Looker Studio for AI visibility."

A compelling feature set would be:

• Fully white-labeled client portals
• Custom domain (clients.youragency.com)
• Multi-tenant architecture
• Scheduled executive reports
• Live AI SOV tracking
• Prompt library management
• Competitor monitoring
• Slack/email alerts for visibility changes
• API + Looker/Power BI connectors
• Billing by client workspace
• Role-based permissions

That moves beyond being another monitoring tool and becomes the reporting infrastructure agencies can standardize on.

My impression is that the market is still early. Many of these platforms launched agency features only recently, and several appear to be converging on the same core feature set. rankfender.com

If your question is motivated by a startup idea, I'd say "white-label AI visibility reporting for agencies" is no longer an open greenfield. The bigger opportunity now is differentiation—for example:

• becoming the Databox or AgencyAnalytics for AI search,
• integrating AI visibility with broader marketing reporting,
• or offering revenue attribution and client-facing insights that go beyond simple AI share-of-voice metrics.

Yes. This is now a fairly well-defined category: AI search visibility / GEO / AEO platforms with agency white-labeling. Several products specifically support client portals, multi-client management, competitive share of voice, and branded reporting.

A few worth looking at:

For example, Geneo explicitly shows a client-facing dashboard with 42.8% Share of Voice, AI mentions, citations, platform breakdowns, custom agency branding, and a custom client domain. geneo.appoutercite.com

LLM Pulse is particularly interesting if you're thinking beyond a pretty dashboard: it offers white-label portals plus a Looker Studio connector, API, CSV/Excel exports, and multi-client projects. llmpulse.aioutercite.com

Outercite is more explicitly positioned as infrastructure for agencies/resellers, including isolated client workspaces, branded reports/emails/share pages, and wholesale economics. outercite.com

If you're evaluating this as an agency product

I'd distinguish between three levels:

1. Reporting tool — takes AI visibility data and makes a nice client report.
2. AI visibility platform — actually tracks prompts across ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini/etc., SOV, sentiment, citations and competitors.
3. Agency infrastructure — multi-tenant client accounts + custom domain + your branding + permissions + API + automated reporting.

If your requirement is specifically "I want my clients to log into ai.myagency.com and believe this is our proprietary AI visibility product", I'd focus on #3. Geneo, LLM Pulse, Outercite and Tower GEO look closest to that requirement based on their current agency offerings. outercite.com

If you're asking because you're considering building/selling a platform like this yourself, that's an especially interesting distinction—the market has plenty of AI visibility trackers, but the agency operating system + white-label client reporting angle is much narrower.

Yes. There’s now a fairly clear category emerging around AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) reporting, and several platforms specifically target agencies.

Strongest options for agency white-label reporting

The one I'd investigate first

AgencyAnalytics is interesting if you're an established SEO/digital agency because AI visibility is integrated into the same reporting environment as Google Analytics, Google Ads, Search Console, etc. Their AI Tracker explicitly reports share of voice, trends, and client-facing AI visibility metrics, with agency branding. agencyanalytics.com

If you want something purpose-built around AI search rather than traditional agency reporting, Geneo looks closer to what you're describing: branded client portal, custom domain/logo, Share of Voice, mentions, citations, sentiment, and platform breakdown. geneo.app

Rankfender is another particularly agency-oriented option: white-label reports, competitive SOV, KPI trends, scheduled delivery, PDF export, and individual client portals. rankfender.com

One important caveat

"AI Share of Voice" isn't yet as standardized as Google ranking or traditional SOV. Different products calculate it differently—for example, based on the percentage of tracked prompts where you're mentioned, the proportion of total mentions among competitors, or some combination of visibility and position. And AI responses are stochastic, so repeated runs can produce materially different results; recent research argues that AI visibility metrics should ideally include uncertainty/error ranges rather than presenting a single number as exact. arxiv.org

So if you're evaluating these as an agency reporting product, I'd specifically ask:

1. How is SOV calculated?
2. Can I define my own competitor set?
3. Can I define/upload my own prompts?
4. Are the actual AI responses and citations available as evidence?
5. Can clients log into a custom-domain portal?
6. Can I completely remove the underlying vendor's branding?
7. Can I export/API the raw data?
8. Can I report SOV → visibility → citations → traffic/conversions rather than just an AI score?

If you're asking because you're considering building a platform like this, there's definitely competition now—but the market still looks relatively immature, particularly around agency-first client reporting + defensible SOV methodology + tying AI visibility to actual business outcomes.

Yes. There’s now a fairly crowded category of AI visibility / GEO / AEO platforms specifically targeting agencies, and several offer exactly what you’re describing: multi-client management + AI share-of-voice metrics + client-facing white-label dashboards/reports.

A few worth looking at:

If you're specifically thinking "agency sends this to clients every month"

I'd shortlist Outercite, LLM Pulse, Geneo, and Aseon.

Outercite is particularly interesting for a true reseller model: it advertises isolated client workspaces, a multi-client roll-up dashboard, branded reports/share pages, custom branding, and a 25% wholesale discount on client seats. outercite.com

LLM Pulse is more explicitly positioned as a white-label infrastructure product: custom domain, logo/colors, client portals, API, Looker Studio connector, and exports. llmpulse.ai

Geneo has perhaps the clearest "client dashboard" positioning: its agency product shows Share of Voice, mentions, citations, platform breakdown, custom domain, logo, and branded client portal. geneo.app

One important distinction

"AI Share of Voice" isn't yet as standardized as traditional SEO share of voice. AI answers are probabilistic and can vary between runs, prompts, models, and time. Research published in 2026 specifically recommends treating GEO visibility as a distribution measured repeatedly, rather than a single definitive number. arxiv.org

So if you're evaluating these platforms for an agency, I'd look beyond the headline "AI visibility score" and make sure the dashboard can show:

• Share of voice vs. named competitors
• % of target prompts where the client is mentioned
• % where the client is recommended
• Citation rate and cited URLs
• Which publications/sites are influencing AI answers
• Sentiment / positioning
• Engine-by-engine breakdown
• Prompt-level evidence ("here's exactly what ChatGPT said")
• Historical trend
• AI referral traffic, if available
• Client-specific prompt sets
• Automated monthly reports
• Custom domain + complete removal of vendor branding

That last part matters if you're trying to sell "AI visibility management" as an agency service rather than simply giving clients access to another SaaS dashboard.

If you're asking because you're considering building a platform in this space, I can also map out the existing competitors, their pricing, feature gaps, and where there still appears to be an underserved agency niche.

Yes. A number of platforms are emerging specifically for AI share of voice (SOV), AI visibility, AEO/GEO reporting, and white-label client dashboards for agencies. The category is still fairly new, but these are some of the more agency-oriented options:

Typical metrics these platforms report:

• AI share of voice (how often a client is mentioned vs competitors)
• Brand mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, etc.
• Citation/source analysis (which websites AI engines rely on)
• Prompt-level tracking (“best X”, “top providers for Y”)
• Sentiment
• Competitor comparisons
• Trend reporting over time
• Client-facing dashboards/PDF reports

A few things to check before choosing:

1. True white-label vs just PDF branding — many tools let you add a logo but still expose vendor branding in the dashboard.
2. Multi-tenant support — important if you manage 20+ clients.
3. Prompt control — SOV is only meaningful if you can define and customize the query set.
4. Engine coverage — some only monitor ChatGPT/Perplexity, while others include Gemini, Claude, Google AI results, etc.
5. API/export options — useful if you want to pipe metrics into your own reporting stack.

If you are thinking about building an agency offering around this, the biggest gap currently appears to be a polished “Semrush-style” AI visibility dashboard that agencies can fully resell under their own brand—many current tools are still closer to audit/report generators than mature client analytics platforms. llmpulse.aioutercite.com

Yes. This has become a distinct category over the last year, often marketed as AI Visibility, Answer Engine Optimization (AEO), or Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). Several platforms now let agencies track AI share of voice across models like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews while providing white-labeled client dashboards.

Some of the strongest options are:

What agencies are typically reporting

Most dashboards include metrics like:

• AI Share of Voice (% of tracked prompts where the client appears vs. competitors)
• Brand mentions
• Citation frequency
• Source websites cited by LLMs
• Sentiment/positioning
• Competitor comparison
• Visibility trends over time
• Breakdown by AI platform (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI)

Many also let you drill into the actual prompts and AI responses so clients can see exactly where they were or weren't mentioned. geneo.appllmpulse.ai

If you're building an agency offering

The platforms that seem closest to "this is your own software" are:

• Geneo
• LLM Pulse
• Rankfender

They support custom domains, agency branding, client portals, and automated reporting, making them suitable if you want clients to log into a dashboard that appears to be your product. llmpulse.ai

If you're considering building your own instead of licensing one, the core reporting stack is relatively straightforward:

• Scheduled prompt testing across major LLMs
• AI share-of-voice calculations
• Competitor benchmarking
• Time-series storage
• White-label multi-tenant dashboards
• PDF/Looker exports
• Client login portal

That combination is still a relatively young market, so there is room for differentiation, particularly if you can tie AI visibility to business outcomes (traffic, leads, conversions) rather than reporting visibility metrics alone.

Yes. There are platforms emerging specifically around AI Search / LLM visibility / AI Share of Voice (SOV) reporting, and several are designed (or adaptable) for agencies that need client-facing, white-label dashboards. The market is still younger than traditional SEO reporting, so capabilities vary.

Some options to look at:

For an agency specifically trying to sell “AI Share of Voice reporting” as a recurring client deliverable, I’d look for these features:

• Prompt portfolio management

(e.g., “best CRM for startups,” “top accounting firms in Chicago,” etc.)

• Brand mention rate
• Citation/source tracking
• Competitor comparison
• LLM coverage (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, etc.)
• Historical trend lines
• Client-branded portal
• PDF/email reports
• Multi-client workspace

A few agencies are also building this themselves using APIs/data providers because the reporting layer is relatively straightforward compared with collecting reliable LLM visibility data.

If your goal is to resell this as an agency service, the closest fits today are probably:

1. Peec AI — purpose-built around AI visibility reporting
2. Profound — strongest enterprise AI visibility data
3. SE Ranking/Semrush-style platforms — easiest transition from existing SEO clients

If you mean a true “AgencyAnalytics for AI SOV” (white-label portal, unlimited client accounts, your logo/domain, automated monthly reports), that category is still relatively open and not as mature as SEO reporting platforms.

Yes. This has become a distinct software category over the last year, often called AI Visibility, AI Share of Voice, LLM Analytics, or GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platforms. Several vendors now specifically target agencies with white-label client dashboards and automated reporting.

Some of the stronger options include:

Typical agency features now include:

• Client-specific AI visibility dashboards
• Share of Voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Overviews
• Competitor comparisons
• Prompt-level tracking
• Scheduled PDF reports
• Custom branding (logo, colors, domain)
• Multi-client management
• API or Looker Studio integrations

If you're thinking about building one

There's still a noticeable gap in the market.

Most existing platforms focus on monitoring:

• "You appeared in 37% of prompts."
• "Your SOV increased 6%."
• "Competitor X overtook you."

Clients, however, often ask:

• Why did we lose visibility?
• Which pages caused the improvement?
• Which citations matter?
• What should we publish next?
• How does AI visibility relate to leads or revenue?

A more differentiated agency platform could combine:

• AI Share of Voice
• Citation tracking
• Content recommendations
• Competitor movement alerts
• Executive-ready client dashboards
• ROI reporting (AI visibility → traffic → conversions)

That moves beyond being a reporting tool into an operating system for AI search optimization.

Market direction

Many industry observers expect AI visibility reporting to become a standard agency deliverable, much like SEO ranking reports did a decade ago. The category is also expanding beyond SEO specialists into PR, brand, and digital marketing agencies as AI assistants increasingly influence buying decisions. www.techradar.com

If you're evaluating this space from a product perspective, there is still room for a platform with stronger workflow automation, clearer ROI attribution, and more polished executive dashboards rather than just another AI visibility tracker.

Yes. There are a few platforms moving in this direction, but there is still a gap in the market if you're specifically looking for agency-first, white-label AI Share of Voice (AI SOV) reporting.

Here's how the landscape breaks down:

What's missing

Most AI visibility tools were designed for brands, not agencies.

Agencies typically want to:

• Add multiple client workspaces
• Use custom domains
• Remove vendor branding
• Automatically generate monthly reports
• Let clients log in
• Add agency branding/colors/logo
• Combine AI SOV with SEO and analytics
• Export PDFs
• API access
• Role-based permissions

Very few AI visibility products offer all of that today.

The closest options

Profound

• Probably the most mature AI visibility platform.
• Tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.
• Enterprise pricing.
• Not really built as a white-label agency portal.

Otterly.AI

• Agency-friendly pricing.
• Tracks prompts and AI rankings.
• Basic reporting.
• Less polished client portal.

Peec AI

• Nice dashboards.
• Growing agency support.
• More marketing-oriented than SEO-oriented.

What agencies are doing instead

Many agencies build their own reporting stack:

• AI visibility platform
• Looker Studio
• AgencyAnalytics
• Databox
• Custom dashboards
• Automated PDFs

They pull AI visibility data via APIs (where available) and present it under their own brand.

Opportunity in the market

There's a compelling opportunity for an "AgencyAnalytics for AI Search."

Imagine a platform with:

• White-label client portals
• Custom domain
• Unlimited clients
• AI Share of Voice
• Prompt tracking
• Competitor comparisons
• Citation tracking
• LLM-specific performance (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.)
• Monthly executive reports
• Slack/email alerts for visibility changes
• AI optimization recommendations
• Integrations with GA4, Search Console, Semrush, Ahrefs, and CRMs
• Multi-user permissions and billing

As AI search becomes a standard marketing channel, agencies increasingly need to show clients measurable performance in AI-generated answers, much like they already do for SEO rankings.

If you're evaluating this as a business idea, it's a relatively uncrowded niche compared with traditional SEO software. Many existing AI visibility products focus on enterprise marketing teams rather than agencies, leaving room for a purpose-built, white-label reporting platform.

Yes. This has become a distinct category over the last year as agencies have started selling "AI visibility," "AI search optimization (GEO)," or "LLM SEO" services. Several platforms now offer multi-client management plus white-label reporting.

Here's how they compare:

What agencies typically want

Most agencies don't just want "share of voice." They want a client portal that answers:

• AI Share of Voice over time
• Brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI
• Competitor comparison
• Which prompts trigger the brand
• Citation/source tracking
• Sentiment or positioning
• Executive PDF reports
• Custom logo, colors, and domain
• Client login
• Automated monthly reports

That has become the standard feature set. geneo.app

One gap that still exists

One area that's still relatively underserved is agency-grade client reporting, especially for larger agencies.

Many tools focus on measuring AI visibility, but fewer provide:

• true multi-tenant architecture
• agency-level user permissions
• portfolio-wide benchmarking
• API access for BI tools
• client-specific prompt libraries
• customizable KPIs
• billing and workspace management
• branded executive dashboards that look like the agency built them

This is similar to what HighLevel did for CRM or Databox did for marketing dashboards—but for AI visibility.

If you're thinking about building one

There is still room for a platform positioned as the "Looker Studio for AI visibility agencies." Rather than competing on who measures mentions most accurately, the differentiation could be:

• White-label portals on the agency's domain
• Executive dashboards for clients
• Custom metrics and scorecards
• Integrations with GA4, Search Console, HubSpot, Salesforce, and CRM data
• Scheduled reports
• Portfolio analytics across dozens or hundreds of clients
• APIs and embedded dashboards

That positioning targets agencies that want to productize AI visibility as an ongoing service, rather than simply using another analytics tool internally.

I think the market is moving toward agencies selling monthly "AI visibility retainers," so the reporting layer itself is becoming almost as important as the underlying measurement.