ChatGPT answers, unedited

If your core requirement is AI share of voice (SOV) across countries and languages, I’d shortlist these:

• tryprofound.com — Strong fit for enterprise/global competitive intelligence. Its current dataset spans 1.9B+ real-user conversations, 50+ industries, and multiple answer engines; its 2026 research specifically examines cross-market visibility. Profound
• enterprise.semrush.com — Particularly compelling if you already use Semrush. It advertises 15 regional AI-search databases, 289M prompts, competitor benchmarking, and drill-downs from global SOV to market/city/product/prompt. Semrush for Enterprise
• llmpulse.ai — Very explicitly designed for country + language comparisons. It supports multiple countries/languages in the same project, portfolio-level SOV, and BI/API integrations including Power BI and Looker Studio. LLM Pulse
• demandsphere.com — Interesting if you want to combine traditional search SOV and AI SOV. It covers 200+ traditional-search markets plus LLM visibility, with mentions, citations, sentiment and SOV. DemandSphere DemandSphere
• seorce.com — Built around multinational brands, with native-language monitoring across 14 languages, regional competitor SOV, and a consolidated HQ view. Seorce
• searchable.com — Enterprise-oriented tracking across models, markets and prompts, including SOV/citation share and competitor benchmarking. Searchable

How I'd narrow it

One important caveat: “share of voice” isn't standardized across vendors. Different platforms can weight mentions, position, citations, prompts, models, or response frequency differently. Verity Score

For a serious global measurement program, I'd therefore evaluate vendors on methodology before dashboard quality: can they run genuinely localized prompts, rather than merely translating a US prompt? Can you hold the prompt set constant across markets? Can you compare brand mention SOV vs citation SOV separately? And can you export the underlying response/citation data?

If you tell me your number of markets/languages, industry, and approximate monthly prompt volume, I can narrow this to a 3-vendor shortlist and compare coverage, methodology, integrations, and likely pricing.

For AI share of voice across geographic markets and languages, I’d shortlist:

• tryprofound.com — strongest fit for enterprise/global market analysis. It supports Share of Voice broken down by regions, platforms, topics and competitors, with dashboards/API access. Profound Help Center Profound
• otterly.ai — particularly good if you need 65+ countries + multilingual prompt monitoring and want SOV by market, engine and prompt. Otterly AI Otterly AI Otterly
• peec.ai — good for competitive SOV and country-gap analysis, with visibility, position, sentiment and SOV metrics. Peec AI Peec AI

My practical shortlist: Profound for large-scale/global enterprise reporting; OtterlyAI for broad country/language coverage; Peec for a simpler competitive-visibility workflow.

If your core requirement is AI share of voice (SOV) by geography and language, I’d shortlist these differently from a generic “best GEO tools” list.

My shortlist

1. Semrush — my first choice

For your specific use case, Semrush is probably the strongest starting point.

Its current AI visibility product explicitly reports AI Share of Voice, sentiment and narratives across 68,000+ location-language combinations, refreshed weekly. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews, and provides regional breakdowns. Semrush

That makes it particularly interesting if you want questions like:

“What's our AI SOV for Brand X vs Competitor A/B/C in Germany, France, Japan and the US—and how does that change when the prompt is asked in each local language?”

That's a materially better fit than a tool that merely lets you specify a handful of countries.

2. Profound — best for deep enterprise intelligence

tryprofound.com would be my second choice, particularly if you're building a serious enterprise GEO/AEO measurement program.

Its strength is depth: competitive AI visibility, citations, prompt-volume intelligence and analysis of how brands appear in AI answers. Profound

I'd favor Profound over Semrush if your team cares more about deep AI-search intelligence and enterprise analysis than having AI visibility tightly integrated with a broader SEO stack.

3. Peec AI — best value for multi-market monitoring

peec.ai is worth putting on the shortlist if you need lots of countries/markets without buying a heavyweight enterprise platform.

Independent 2026 comparisons generally position it as the mid-market option between inexpensive trackers and enterprise platforms, with particularly good multi-country dashboards and competitive benchmarking. Geosoftware Rankings NBound Marketing

4. BrightEdge — best if you're already an enterprise SEO customer

brightedge.com is compelling if your organization already uses BrightEdge.

AI Catalyst combines traditional SEO and AI-search visibility and tracks brand presence/sentiment across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. BrightEdge BrightEdge

I'd choose it primarily when global SEO + AI visibility need to live in the same enterprise reporting/governance system.

One important caveat: “geographic” isn't enough

For your use case, I'd insist that the vendor let you distinguish:

US + English
≠ US + Spanish
≠ Mexico + Spanish
≠ Spain + Spanish

The same applies to France/Canada, Germany/Austria/Switzerland, Portuguese in Brazil/Portugal, etc.

You also want to know whether “location” means merely a reporting filter or whether the platform actually generates the AI query with the appropriate language, country context and search environment.

And if China is part of your footprint, this becomes especially important: many Western GEO platforms don't adequately cover Chinese AI ecosystems such as DeepSeek, Kimi, Doubao, Yuanbao and Baidu AI. GeoEcho

My recommendation

If I were evaluating this for a global brand, I'd run an actual bake-off between:

1. Semrush — strongest initial candidate for location × language SOV
2. Profound — strongest candidate for deep enterprise AI intelligence
3. Peec AI — strongest candidate for cost-effective multi-market monitoring

And I would not buy based on the headline “AI Visibility Score.” I'd ask each vendor to produce the same matrix:

Brand × competitor × AI engine × country × language × prompt category × SOV × citation share × sentiment

using, say, 10 countries × 3 languages × 100 prompts × 5 competitors.

That test will reveal very quickly which platform actually handles your global-market use case rather than merely claiming “global AI visibility.”

“What's our AI SOV for Brand X vs Competitor A/B/C in Germany, France, Japan and the US—and how does that change when the prompt is asked in each local language?”

That's a materially better fit than a tool that merely lets you specify a handful of countries.

2. Profound — best for deep enterprise intelligence

tryprofound.com would be my second choice, particularly if you're building a serious enterprise GEO/AEO measurement program.

Its strength is depth: competitive AI visibility, citations, prompt-volume intelligence and analysis of how brands appear in AI answers. Profound

I'd favor Profound over Semrush if your team cares more about deep AI-search intelligence and enterprise analysis than having AI visibility tightly integrated with a broader SEO stack.

3. Peec AI — best value for multi-market monitoring

peec.ai is worth putting on the shortlist if you need lots of countries/markets without buying a heavyweight enterprise platform.

Independent 2026 comparisons generally position it as the mid-market option between inexpensive trackers and enterprise platforms, with particularly good multi-country dashboards and competitive benchmarking. Geosoftware Rankings NBound Marketing

4. BrightEdge — best if you're already an enterprise SEO customer

brightedge.com is compelling if your organization already uses BrightEdge.

AI Catalyst combines traditional SEO and AI-search visibility and tracks brand presence/sentiment across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. brightedge.com brightedge.com

I'd choose it primarily when global SEO + AI visibility need to live in the same enterprise reporting/governance system.

One important caveat: “geographic” isn't enough

For your use case, I'd insist that the vendor let you distinguish:

US + English
≠ US + Spanish
≠ Mexico + Spanish
≠ Spain + Spanish

The same applies to France/Canada, Germany/Austria/Switzerland, Portuguese in Brazil/Portugal, etc.

You also want to know whether “location” means merely a reporting filter or whether the platform actually generates the AI query with the appropriate language, country context and search environment.

If by AI share of voice you mean “What % of relevant AI answers mention/recommend my brand vs. competitors, broken down by country, language, AI engine, and prompt?”, I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation

For a multinational company, I'd start with Profound and Peec AI.

Profound is the one I'd choose if you need a serious enterprise measurement system: large prompt sets, competitor comparisons, citation/source analysis, and reporting across multiple AI engines. Recent comparisons consistently position it as the enterprise-oriented option. Generative QA CapstonAI

Peec AI is particularly interesting if your primary question is “How does our AI visibility change between Germany vs. France vs. US, or English vs. German vs. French?” It is more focused on straightforward competitive share-of-voice analytics and is considerably lighter than an enterprise Profound deployment. Generative QA Geohats

Otterly.AI is the value option. It explicitly tracks mentions, citations, sentiment, rank and share of voice across seven AI engines, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google's AI products. Otterly

The important thing: don't just compare “language support”

For your use case, I'd test whether each vendor lets you create a matrix like:

Market × Language × AI engine × Prompt × Competitor

For example:

• US × English × ChatGPT
• US × Spanish × ChatGPT
• Mexico × Spanish × ChatGPT
• France × French × ChatGPT
• Germany × German × Gemini
• UK × English × Perplexity
• Japan × Japanese × Gemini

Then measure:

• Share of voice — % of answers mentioning you
• Share of recommendations — % where you're actually recommended
• Position/rank — #1, #2, #3, etc.
• Sentiment / brand perception
• Citation share — how often your site is cited
• Competitor share
• Prompt-level results
• AI-engine differences
• Country/language differences
• Change over time

That's much more valuable than a single global “AI visibility score.” Current comparisons also emphasize that engine-specific and market-specific results can differ substantially, so blended scores can conceal important differences. GeoHero

One caveat

Geographic targeting is the feature I'd scrutinize hardest in demos. “Supports 20 languages” isn't necessarily the same as actually being able to execute geographically localized prompts and report SOV separately. Ask vendors to demonstrate a concrete country + language + engine comparison using your prompts.

If you tell me how many countries/languages you're managing (e.g. 10 countries / 6 languages) and whether this is B2B, ecommerce, travel, SaaS, etc., I can give you a much tighter Profound vs. Peec vs. Otterly vs. Semrush comparison, including which one I'd buy and what questions to ask each vendor.

Market × Language × AI engine × Prompt × Competitor

For example:

• US × English × ChatGPT
• US × Spanish × ChatGPT
• Mexico × Spanish × ChatGPT
• France × French × ChatGPT
• Germany × German × Gemini
• UK × English × Perplexity
• Japan × Japanese × Gemini

Then measure:

If you mean AI Share of Voice (AI SOV) — tracking how often your brand appears in answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, etc., broken down by country, city, and language — the best tools depend on whether you are an enterprise brand, SEO team, or international marketer. Geo Software Rankings Verity Score

Best AI share-of-voice platforms for global markets

My shortlist by use case

Global consumer brand (50+ countries)

1. Peec AI — strongest fit for multilingual competitive benchmarking. Indexly
2. Profound — if you need enterprise governance, reporting, and scale. Geo Software Rankings
3. Spyglasses — if local market differences matter (cities, regions, franchises). Spyglasses

B2B SaaS / technology company

1. Profound
2. Peec AI
3. Ahrefs Brand Radar

SEO agency managing multiple clients

1. Peec AI
2. Otterly.AI
3. Semrush AI Visibility

Local businesses / franchises

1. Spyglasses
2. Peec AI
3. A custom prompt-monitoring setup

Features I would insist on before buying

For true geographic/language comparison, look for:

• Same prompt set translated/localized across markets (not just translated dashboards)
• Country-specific AI runs (e.g., “best CRM in Germany” vs “best CRM” translated into German)
• Engine-level reporting - ChatGPT
• Gemini
• Perplexity
• Claude
• Google AI Overviews
• Competitor share calculations
• Citation/source tracking (which websites AI trusts)
• Historical trends
• API/export access
• Human-language sentiment analysis

A key caveat: AI answers are non-deterministic, so a reliable platform should run many prompts repeatedly and report trends rather than treating one answer as a definitive ranking. Verity Score

If your priority is specifically “compare Coca-Cola vs Pepsi AI visibility in 40 countries and 20 languages” or “track our SaaS category share across ChatGPT/Gemini by region,” I would narrow the list differently.

If your priority is comparing AI share of voice across countries and languages, I’d shortlist these:

My top picks

1. Rovoki — best fit for your exact use case

Rovoki explicitly reports visibility by country and language, with 31 languages and 18 countries, and lets you compare your brand against competitors at the engine/language level. Rovoki

That makes it particularly interesting if you're asking questions like:

"What's our AI share of voice for CRM software in Germany in German vs. the UK in English vs. France in French?"

2. KIME — best broad-market alternative

KIME is designed around comparisons across markets, languages, AI models, competitors, and sentiment, and says it runs tracked prompts daily. KIME

I'd look at this if you want a more comprehensive AI-search monitoring platform rather than just a geographic SOV dashboard.

3. Semrush Enterprise AIO — best if you already live in the Semrush ecosystem

Semrush now has explicit AI Share of Voice reporting, including competitor SOV and trends over time across AI platforms. Semrush It's probably the safest choice if you also need conventional SEO, keyword, and competitive-search data in the same platform.

4. Hertz — worth evaluating for large international programs

Hertz explicitly supports per-market and per-language tracking, competitor SOV, and a broad set of AI engines. Hertz

One important requirement I'd insist on

Don't buy a tool merely because it says it supports "countries." You want it to actually execute equivalent prompts separately within each market/language context, rather than translate one global prompt and aggregate the results.

That's important because AI answers and cited sources can differ dramatically by country even when the language is the same. Recent research, for example, found substantial differences in cited sources between English-speaking countries. Temso AI

Your ideal dashboard should therefore let you slice:

Brand → Competitor → Prompt cluster → AI engine → Country → Language → Time

and show at least:

• Share of voice %
• Mention rate
• Position/rank in answer
• Recommendation rate
• Citation share
• Sources/domains cited
• Sentiment
• Historical change
• Competitor displacement

For that specific requirement, I'd start demos with Rovoki, KIME, and Semrush Enterprise AIO, with Hertz as the fourth if you're running a large multinational program. Rovoki KIME Semrush Hertz

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages, number of brands, and whether this is for an agency or in-house marketing team, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, coverage, APIs, and reporting capabilities.

That makes it particularly interesting if you're asking questions like:

"What's our AI share of voice for CRM software in Germany in German vs. the UK in English vs. France in French?"

2. KIME — best broad-market alternative

KIME is designed around comparisons across markets, languages, AI models, competitors, and sentiment, and says it runs tracked prompts daily. KIME

I'd look at this if you want a more comprehensive AI-search monitoring platform rather than just a geographic SOV dashboard.

3. Semrush Enterprise AIO — best if you already live in the Semrush ecosystem

Semrush now has explicit AI Share of Voice reporting, including competitor SOV and trends over time across AI platforms. Semrush It's probably the safest choice if you also need conventional SEO, keyword, and competitive-search data in the same platform.

4. Hertz — worth evaluating for large international programs

Hertz explicitly supports per-market and per-language tracking, competitor SOV, and a broad set of AI engines. tryhertz.com

One important requirement I'd insist on

Don't buy a tool merely because it says it supports "countries." You want it to actually execute equivalent prompts separately within each market/language context, rather than translate one global prompt and aggregate the results.

That's important because AI answers and cited sources can differ dramatically by country even when the language is the same. Recent research, for example, found substantial differences in cited sources between English-speaking countries.

If you mean AI Share of Voice (SOV) as in “what percentage of AI-generated answers mention/recommend my brand vs competitors, broken down by country, region, and language”, the strongest tools are currently:

My shortlist by use case

Global enterprise brand (50+ countries)

1. Profound
2. Peec AI
3. Hertz

Prioritize:

• country/language segmentation
• competitor benchmarking
• citation/source analysis
• historical trends

Consumer brand with local markets (stores, dealers, franchises)

1. Spyglasses
2. Gensiv
3. Hertz

Look for:

• city-level prompts
• “near me” style queries
• local recommendation tracking

B2B SaaS / category leadership tracking

1. Peec AI
2. Profound
3. Gensiv

Look for:

• “best software for…” prompts
• alternatives/comparison prompts
• buyer-intent prompt clusters

Features I would insist on before buying

A lot of AI visibility tools are still basically “rank trackers for chatbots.” For serious international measurement, require:

• Market localization: ability to run the same prompt in different countries
• Language separation: English US ≠ English UK ≠ German ≠ French
• Engine separation: ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Perplexity vs Claude should not be blended into one number
• Competitor-relative SOV: your share of mentions compared with category competitors
• Prompt portfolios: ability to group prompts by buyer journey
• Answer capture: storing the actual AI responses behind the metric
• Citation analysis: knowing which sources cause competitors to win

The methodology matters because AI answers vary by model, market, and language; a single global score can hide major regional differences. Promptwatch

If I were selecting a platform for a multinational company comparing AI share of voice across 10–50 countries, I would start with Peec AI, Profound, and Hertz and run a pilot against the same 100–500 prompts in each market. AI Visibility Software Indexly Hertz

If you mean AI Share of Voice (AI SOV) as in “how often ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc. mention/recommend my brand vs competitors across countries and languages”, the best tools are still an emerging category. The strongest options for geographic + multilingual comparison are:

My shortlist by use case

Global enterprise (50+ markets, many languages)

1. Semrush AI Visibility — best if you already run SEO/content operations. Semrush
2. Profound — best if AI search reporting is becoming a major executive KPI.
3. Hertz — best if you need granular GEO analysis by market, prompt, and language. Hertz

SaaS / ecommerce brands expanding internationally

1. Indexly — strong mix of competitor SOV, citations, and localization. Indexly
2. Writesonic AI Visibility Tracker — useful when you want measurement plus content actions. Writesonic

Agency reporting / client dashboards

• Semrush or Indexly are likely the easiest to package into recurring reports. Semrush Indexly

What to verify before buying

For multilingual AI SOV, many tools look similar but differ in depth. I would check:

• Prompt localization: Can you run the same intent in English, Spanish, Japanese, German, etc.?
• Market simulation: Can it emulate users in different countries rather than only translate prompts?
• Engine coverage: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot.
• Competitor discovery: Does it find competitors appearing in answers automatically?
• Citation analysis: Does it show why a competitor wins (sources, domains, content)?
• Separate scoring: Does it avoid blending markets/languages into one misleading global score? Citadex

Recommended evaluation framework

For a global brand, I would build a dashboard with:

• AI SOV %
• Mention rate
• Recommendation rate
• Citation share
• Sentiment share
• Average answer position
• Competitor gap
• Country × language × AI engine matrix

Example:

If you tell me your industry (e.g., SaaS, travel, ecommerce, healthcare), number of markets/languages, and whether you need enterprise reporting, I can narrow this to the top 2–3 platforms.

If your specific need is AI share of voice by geography + language + competitor, I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation

1. Profound — best if this is an enterprise/global SEO or marketing program.
Profound is the one I'd investigate first if you need to compare something like US vs. UK vs. Germany vs. France vs. Japan, with localized prompts and competitor SOV. It is positioned toward enterprise customers and provides substantially deeper analytics than the lightweight trackers. Stork.AI Toolsolved

2. Peec AI — probably the best value for your exact use case.
Peec stands out particularly for multi-brand, multi-market and multilingual monitoring. Current comparisons report support for 115+ languages, alongside competitor SOV and multi-engine tracking. AISEOShift Toolsolved

3. Promptwatch — interesting if you want measurement → action.
It goes beyond SOV monitoring into content-gap analysis, content generation, crawler/agent analytics and traffic attribution. It also supports multi-language/multi-region tracking. Toolsolved

One important distinction

Don't evaluate these tools just on "number of languages." For your use case, I'd specifically test whether they can create localized AI-search environments, e.g.:

Brand: Acme
Market: Germany
Language: German
Engine: ChatGPT
Prompt: "Welche sind die besten CRM-Systeme für mittelständische Unternehmen?"
Competitors: Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive

…and separately:

Market: France
Language: French
Engine: ChatGPT
Same commercial intent

You want the resulting dashboard to give you something like:

Germany — German

• Acme: 31% SOV
• Salesforce: 27%
• HubSpot: 22%
• Pipedrive: 12%

France — French

• Acme: 14%
• Salesforce: 35%
• HubSpot: 29%
• Pipedrive: 9%

That's much more useful than a single global "AI visibility score."

If I were buying today

• Fortune 500 / 20+ markets: Profound
• 5–15 markets / multilingual marketing team: Peec AI
• Want measurement + automated optimization: Promptwatch
• Need broad engine coverage: Scrunch
• Need to prove the concept cheaply: Otterly

A recent 2026 comparison similarly puts Profound at the enterprise end, Peec in the mid-market, and Otterly at the accessible end; importantly, it notes that language and market support is still a differentiator because many AI-visibility tools remain English-centric. Sapian Metrics

If you tell me how many countries/languages you need (e.g. 10 countries / 6 languages) and whether you're tracking ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc., I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their exact geo/language capabilities and pricing.

…and separately:

Market: France
Language: French
Engine: ChatGPT
Same commercial intent

You want the resulting dashboard to give you something like:

Germany — German

• Acme: 31% SOV
• Salesforce: 27%
• HubSpot: 22%
• Pipedrive: 12%

France — French

• Acme: 14%
• Salesforce: 35%
• HubSpot: 29%
• Pipedrive: 9%

That's much more useful than a single global "AI visibility score."

If I were buying today

• Fortune 500 / 20+ markets: Profound
• 5–15 markets / multilingual marketing team: Peec AI
• Want measurement + automated optimization: Promptwatch
• Need broad engine coverage: Scrunch
• Need to prove the concept cheaply: Otterly

A recent 2026 comparison similarly puts Profound at the enterprise end, Peec in the mid-market, and Otterly at the accessible end; importantly, it notes that language and market support is still a differentiator because many AI-visibility tools remain English-centric.

If your specific requirement is AI share of voice by country + language, I’d shortlist these:

My top 3

1. LLM Pulse — best fit for your exact use case

This is probably where I'd start if you're trying to answer questions like:

“What is our AI SOV in Germany vs. France vs. Japan, and how does that change when we ask in German, French, and Japanese?”

LLM Pulse explicitly supports multiple countries and languages, market-by-market share of voice, competitor benchmarking, and feeds into Power BI, Looker Studio, APIs, webhooks, and warehouses. LLM Pulse

llmpulse.ai

2. Semrush — best if you already use Semrush

Semrush's AI Visibility tooling lets you specify location and language, compare competitors, and see AI share of voice by AI system. Its Enterprise AIO product also weights SOV by mentions and position in AI responses. Semrush

semrush.com

The advantage is maturity + integration with conventional SEO/search data. I'd favor it if your goal is to put AI SOV alongside Google rankings, organic traffic, keyword data, etc.

3. Hertz — best for a sophisticated global GEO program

Hertz is particularly interesting if you want market × language × prompt × engine analysis. It explicitly supports per-market and per-language tracking, competitor SOV, citations, sentiment, accuracy/hallucination detection, and prompt-cluster scoring. Hertz

tryhertz.com

One important distinction

I'd not choose based simply on “AI visibility score.” For multinational SOV measurement, I'd insist that the platform gives you the underlying dimensions:

• Mention rate — how often you're mentioned
• Share of voice — your mentions vs. competitors
• Position/rank — where you appear in the answer
• Citation share — how often your site is actually cited
• Sentiment/recommendation quality
• Engine — ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Perplexity vs. Google AI
• Country/market
• Language
• Prompt/query
• Competitor
• Historical trend

That's important because a single global AI visibility score can completely hide regional differences. A brand can be dominant in the US but practically invisible in Germany or Japan.

For example, Menra explicitly separates visibility by region and language, while Scout LLM goes as far as city-level tracking. Menra Scout LLM

If I were evaluating vendors

I'd run the same 50–100 commercial prompts through each platform in, say:

US / English → UK / English → France / French → Germany / German → Japan / Japanese → Brazil / Portuguese

Then compare whether each tool can reliably produce a matrix like:

Brand × competitor × country × language × AI engine × SOV × citation share × position

That's a much better test than vendor demos.

Bottom line: For your stated requirement, my order would be LLM Pulse → Semrush Enterprise AIO → Hertz, with Menra worth testing if multilingual/regional flexibility is more important than enterprise ecosystem. LLM Pulse Hertz Semrush

3. Hertz — best for a sophisticated global GEO program

Hertz is particularly interesting if you want market × language × prompt × engine analysis. It explicitly supports per-market and per-language tracking, competitor SOV, citations, sentiment, accuracy/hallucination detection, and prompt-cluster scoring. tryhertz.com

3. tryprofound.com — best enterprise option

Profound is strong for larger organizations that need dashboards, reporting and broader GEO workflows. Its dashboards include Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, with filters for platforms, regions, topics and personas.

It also exposes SOV/visibility data by regions and topics for downstream analysis.

The tradeoff is that its geographic granularity can be less compelling than Scrunch for a genuinely global/localized program.

My ranking for your exact requirement

If you mean AI share of voice (SOV) as in “how often does my brand get mentioned/recommended by ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc. compared with competitors — broken down by country and language?”, the best tools are in the emerging AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) category. The strongest options depend on whether you need enterprise reporting, multilingual depth, or agency workflows. Citadex Citadex

Best AI share-of-voice tools for geographic + language comparison

My shortlist by use case

For a global enterprise (10+ countries, many languages)

1. Rovoki — strongest fit if you need “same prompt, different language/country, different AI answer” analysis. Rovoki
2. SE Ranking AI visibility — good if you already manage SEO globally. Llm Visibility
3. BrightEdge — best when AI visibility is part of a broader enterprise SEO stack. Citadex

For a marketing agency managing clients

1. Omnia — reporting-oriented and designed for multiple brands. Omnia
2. Scout LLM — useful if you need competitor SOV trends and recurring tracking. Scout LLM

For multilingual/local-market intelligence

1. PSentry — specifically aimed at international brands comparing AI visibility across languages. psentry
2. Rovoki — strong market-by-market analysis. Rovoki

Features I would require before buying

A serious AI SOV platform should let you slice data by:

• Country (e.g., US vs Germany vs Japan)
• Language (English vs German vs Japanese, not just translated prompts)
• AI engine (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity)
• Prompt category / buyer intent
• Competitor mentions
• Brand position in answers
• Citations/sources used by AI
• Historical trend lines
• Localized prompts (native-language queries, not machine translations)

A common mistake is buying a tool that gives one “global AI visibility score.” For international brands, that can hide the important finding: you may dominate English-language AI answers while being invisible in German, French, Japanese, or Spanish answers. Rovoki psentry

If you tell me your approximate scale (e.g., B2B vs B2C, number of countries, languages, competitors tracked, and whether you need agency reporting or internal analytics), I can narrow this to the top 2–3.

If by AI share of voice you mean “how often does my brand appear/recommend/cite versus competitors when buyers ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc., broken down by country/market and language,” I’d shortlist these:

1. My pick: Peec AI

Peec AI is probably the closest match to what you're describing.

It specifically emphasizes multilingual AI visibility, with reporting across 100+ languages and country-level breakdowns, plus competitor benchmarking, sentiment, prompt discovery and citation-source analysis. Loudmink Citadex

That makes it particularly useful for questions like:

“What is our AI share of voice for ‘best CRM software’ in the US vs Germany vs France vs Japan, and does the answer change when the prompt is asked in each country's native language?”

I'd put Peec first if geographic/language segmentation is more important to you than enterprise workflow.

2. Profound — best for enterprise

Profound is the one I'd evaluate alongside Peec if you're a large organization.

It has particularly broad AI-search/engine coverage and reportedly supports 30+ languages across 150+ regions. Citadex

Its advantage is less “cheap multilingual dashboard” and more deep enterprise AI-search intelligence: competitive visibility, citations, prompts, sources and reporting.

3. Otterly.AI — best lower-cost option

Otterly.AI is worth considering if you want to get started without an enterprise commitment.

Current comparisons put its entry pricing around $29/month, with higher tiers for substantially more prompts and additional AI engines. Marqeable

I'd choose it when cost and straightforward monitoring matter more than sophisticated international-market analysis.

4. Pi Datametrics — interesting if you mean “SOV” literally

Pi Datametrics is a slightly different proposition. Its Share of Voice tooling measures visibility across traditional search, AI Overviews and SERP features, with market-level competitor benchmarking. It can compare up to 30 competitors. Pi Datametrics

This could be compelling if your ultimate dashboard needs to answer:

Google SOV + AI SOV + competitor SOV by country/market.

What I'd actually test

For a multinational company, I'd run a 2–4 week bake-off between Peec and Profound, using exactly the same:

• 100–300 buyer-intent prompts
• 5–10 competitors
• 5–10 geographic markets
• Native-language prompts for each market
• ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude
• Daily/weekly measurements
• Brand mention rate
• AI share of voice
• Recommendation/ranking position
• Citation share
• Sentiment
• Cited domains/sources

The critical point is not to compare their headline “AI visibility scores.” You want to know whether they can calculate SOV from a consistent prompt universe and then slice it by engine × country × language × prompt category × competitor. The underlying prompt set and sampling methodology can materially change the SOV number. GeoHero Sapian Metrics

Bottom line:
Peec → best match for multilingual/geographic AI SOV.
Profound → best if you're an enterprise and want deeper intelligence.
Otterly → best budget-conscious choice.
Pi Datametrics → worth a serious look if you want AI SOV integrated with conventional search SOV.

If you tell me how many countries/languages, roughly how many prompts, and whether you're B2B or B2C, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best platforms and compare their actual capabilities/pricing in a decision matrix.

“What is our AI share of voice for ‘best CRM software’ in the US vs Germany vs France vs Japan, and does the answer change when the prompt is asked in each country's native language?”

I'd put Peec first if geographic/language segmentation is more important to you than enterprise workflow.

2. Profound — best for enterprise

Profound is the one I'd evaluate alongside Peec if you're a large organization.

It has particularly broad AI-search/engine coverage and reportedly supports 30+ languages across 150+ regions. Citadex

Its advantage is less “cheap multilingual dashboard” and more deep enterprise AI-search intelligence: competitive visibility, citations, prompts, sources and reporting.

3. Otterly.AI — best lower-cost option

Otterly.AI is worth considering if you want to get started without an enterprise commitment.

Current comparisons put its entry pricing around $29/month, with higher tiers for substantially more prompts and additional AI engines. marqeable.com

I'd choose it when cost and straightforward monitoring matter more than sophisticated international-market analysis.

4. Pi Datametrics — interesting if you mean “SOV” literally

Pi Datametrics is a slightly different proposition. Its Share of Voice tooling measures visibility across traditional search, AI Overviews and SERP features, with market-level competitor benchmarking. It can compare up to 30 competitors.

This could be compelling if your ultimate dashboard needs to answer:

Google SOV + AI SOV + competitor SOV by country/market.

What I'd actually test

If by AI share of voice you mean “for the same set of prompts, how often does our brand get mentioned/recommended/cited versus competitors, broken down by country, language, AI engine, and time”, I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation

For a multinational company, I'd start with Profound and Peec AI.

Profound is the one I'd choose if the requirement is genuinely global market intelligence: comparing visibility across markets, engines, competitors, prompts and citations. Current comparisons put it at the enterprise end of the market, with substantially broader engine/analytics coverage at higher tiers. licheo.com AnswerManiac

Peec AI is particularly interesting for your use case because it emphasizes multilingual monitoring and country-level breakdowns, alongside competitor share-of-voice, sentiment and source analysis. One recent comparison reports 100+ language coverage. Loudmink

Otterly is what I'd use for a smaller-scale proof of concept. It's dramatically cheaper, but you'll run into limitations sooner if you need lots of markets, languages, prompts and deep analysis. Marqeable

One important buying criterion

Don't just ask vendors “Do you support multiple countries/languages?”

Ask them to demonstrate this exact workflow:

Brand A vs Brand B vs Brand C → same 100 prompts → US English vs UK English vs German vs French vs Japanese → ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Perplexity vs Google AI → SOV, mention rate, citation rate and sentiment → historical trend.

That's the test that separates genuinely useful global AI-search intelligence from tools that merely translate your prompts and give you a generic visibility score.

Also ask whether the geographic result represents localized AI/search behavior or merely a prompt translated into another language. That's a significant methodological difference.

If you tell me how many markets/languages you need and whether this is B2B, ecommerce, travel, SaaS, etc., I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare their exact geo/language capabilities, pricing, API/BI options, and limitations.

If your goal is specifically AI share of voice (SoV) by country × language × AI engine, rather than generic “GEO optimization,” I’d shortlist these:

Semrush is particularly compelling for this use case because its Enterprise AIO reporting explicitly lets you break AI visibility down by model, country, language and topic, on top of its large prompt database. Adobe for Business Semrush

My ranking for your specific use case

1. Semrush Enterprise AIO — best overall

I'd start here if you're comparing something like:

US / English vs Germany / German vs France / French vs Japan / Japanese, across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, etc.

It has the strongest combination of market segmentation + language + AI engine + competitor SoV + existing SEO data. Adobe for Business

2. Profound — best dedicated AI-search platform

If you don't care about traditional SEO and want a purpose-built AI visibility intelligence platform, Profound is one of the strongest enterprise options. It is specifically positioned around monitoring AI citations/mentions and competitive visibility. MarketsandMarkets

3. Peec AI — best multilingual contender

I'd put Peec unusually high on your list if language coverage is the difficult part. Its published coverage is 115+ languages, including Japanese, Korean and Chinese. Citadex

4. DemandSphere — best unified SEO + AI option

Interesting if your organization wants one measurement framework for conventional search and AI search. It reports AI citations/mentions and SoV while also covering traditional SERPs across 200+ markets. DemandSphere

One important caveat

Don't buy based merely on the vendor saying “global” or “multilingual.”

For your use case, I'd require the platform to let you define a measurement cell like:

Country × language × engine × prompt cohort

For example:

Germany × German × ChatGPT × enterprise CRM queries

and separately:

Austria × German × ChatGPT × enterprise CRM queries

That's important because language isn't a proxy for market. Research in 2026 found that AI-cited sources can differ dramatically between countries even when the language is identical; one study found 81–93% of source domains were country-exclusive across the software categories it examined. Temso AI

I'd also insist on seeing the underlying prompts, individual AI answers, citations, competitors and sample sizes, not just a proprietary “AI visibility score.” AI responses are nondeterministic, so a single aggregate number can be misleading. Verity Score

If you tell me roughly how many markets/languages you need (e.g. 10 countries / 6 languages vs 50+), and whether you're B2B, ecommerce, SaaS, or another category, I can narrow this to the 2–3 platforms I'd actually demo and give you a feature/pricing comparison.

If your core requirement is AI share of voice by geography and language, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: Profound

For a multinational brand where you want something like:

“What's our AI SOV for Brand X vs. competitors in Germany, France, Japan and the US, broken down by language, AI engine, topic and time?”

Profound is probably the strongest fit. Its Answer Engine Insights supports Share of Voice, regional analysis, competitors, topics and multiple AI platforms. Its regional view includes country-level visualization, and its current product supports filtering dashboards by regions and other dimensions. Profound Profound Knowledge Base

Its newer Profound Index is also interesting for benchmarking because it is built from 1.9B+ real-user conversations across 50+ industries and looks specifically at cross-market brand visibility. Profound

tryprofound.com

Peec AI is the one I'd test alongside it

Peec has unusually straightforward SOV reporting: it defines SOV as your brand's share of all tracked-brand mentions and lets you compare competitors, engines, prompts and countries. Peec AI Peec AI

It also has an explicit country-gap analysis, which makes questions such as “Which countries are our competitors dominating?” easy to operationalize. Peec AI

peec.ai

If you have thousands of local locations: Uberall

This is a different use case. If by “geographic markets” you mean individual cities/stores/locations, rather than countries, Uberall is particularly compelling. Its GEO Studio claims location-level SOV across markets, while its local platform provides 30+ country coverage and native local data. Uberall

uberall.com

What I'd choose

• Global enterprise / country × language × competitor analysis: Profound
• Marketing team wanting the cleanest AI-visibility/SOV workflow: Peec AI
• Retail, hospitality, healthcare, franchises, or other multi-location business: Uberall
• Cheap/lightweight ChatGPT-only monitoring: AnswerMonk

One important caveat: “geographic” and “language” aren't interchangeable dimensions. Before buying, I'd explicitly test whether a platform actually runs localized prompts in the target language and market (e.g. French prompts from France), rather than merely filtering US/English results by country. That's crucial if you're measuring genuine international AI share of voice.

If you tell me how many countries/languages you need and which AI engines matter (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, etc.), I can give you a much more precise Profound vs. Peec vs. Uberall comparison, including pricing and the best option for your use case.

Profound is probably the strongest fit. Its Answer Engine Insights supports Share of Voice, regional analysis, competitors, topics and multiple AI platforms. Its regional view includes country-level visualization, and its current product supports filtering dashboards by regions and other dimensions. Profound Profound Knowledge Base

Its newer Profound Index is also interesting for benchmarking because it is built from 1.9B+ real-user conversations across 50+ industries and looks specifically at cross-market brand visibility. Profound

tryprofound.com

Peec AI is the one I'd test alongside it

Peec has unusually straightforward SOV reporting: it defines SOV as your brand's share of all tracked-brand mentions and lets you compare competitors, engines, prompts and countries. Peec AI Peec AI

It also has an explicit country-gap analysis, which makes questions such as “Which countries are our competitors dominating?” easy to operationalize. Peec AI

peec.ai

If you have thousands of local locations: Uberall

This is a different use case. If by “geographic markets” you mean individual cities/stores/locations, rather than countries, Uberall is particularly compelling. Its GEO Studio claims location-level SOV across markets, while its local platform provides 30+ country coverage and native local data.

If your specific requirement is AI share of voice (SOV) by geographic market and language, I’d shortlist these:

1. scrunch.com — my first choice

For your use case, Scrunch is probably the strongest fit.

It lets you set the country at the prompt level, so you can ask the same commercial question from different markets and compare the resulting AI visibility. Importantly, the geographic targeting actually affects where the query originates, rather than merely tagging a result after the fact. Scrunch Help Center Scrunch Help Center

It also supports prompts in any language used by the AI platforms it monitors, and lets you combine language with country. That is particularly useful for something like:

• US + English
• UK + English
• France + French
• Germany + German
• Spain + Spanish
• Japan + Japanese
• Brazil + Portuguese

You can then compare brand presence, competitors, citations and SOV across those dimensions. Scrunch Help Center Scrunch Help Center

This is much closer to what I'd call true international AI SOV measurement than simply translating an English prompt and looking at a global average.

2. tryprofound.com — best enterprise alternative

I'd look closely at Profound if this is for a large enterprise SEO/brand team.

Its dashboards explicitly support Share of Voice, Visibility Score, Average Position and Citation Rank, with filtering by regions, platforms, topics and personas. Profound

Profound also exposes SOV across models, regions and topics, which makes it well suited to executive reporting. Profound Knowledge Base

The distinction I'd make is:

Scrunch → better if your central problem is “How does our AI visibility differ by country/language?”

Profound → better if your central problem is “Give our enterprise marketing organization a sophisticated AI-search intelligence/reporting system.”

3. peec.ai — easiest SOV-oriented option

Peec is particularly attractive if you want a straightforward brand vs. competitors view.

It explicitly calculates SOV based on brand mentions and provides visibility, position, sentiment and SOV comparisons across AI engines. Peec AI

I'd put it ahead of the others if your primary dashboard is essentially:

“In category X, what percentage of AI answers mention us vs. Competitor A/B/C?”

rather than deep international market research.

4. geoscout.pro — interesting for non-US markets

This one becomes especially interesting if your geographic markets include places where local AI/search products matter.

GEO Scout says it monitors 12 AI providers, including Google AI Mode/Overviews, Yandex with Alice, GigaChat and Microsoft Copilot. That's potentially important if, for example, your international strategy includes markets where ChatGPT/Perplexity aren't the whole AI-search ecosystem. GEO Scout

My recommendation

If I were evaluating these specifically for a global AI SOV program, I'd run a bake-off between:

1. Scrunch → best match for country × language × prompt × competitor × AI engine

2. Profound → best for enterprise-grade reporting/intelligence

3. Peec AI → best for simple SOV benchmarking

4. GEO Scout → best if local/non-Western AI engines are strategically important.

One important methodological point: don't compare “US English” vs. “France English” and call that a language comparison. For a meaningful international analysis, you want something like France + French, France + English, Germany + German, etc., because the language of the prompt itself changes retrieval and citation behavior. Scrunch specifically recommends creating prompts in each language and pairing them with the appropriate geography. Scrunch Help Center

If you tell me your number of markets/languages, approximate prompt volume, and whether this is for SEO, brand/PR, or competitive intelligence, I can narrow this to the 2–3 tools I'd actually buy and give you a feature/pricing comparison.

If you mean AI share of voice (SOV) as in “what percentage of AI-generated answers mention/recommend my brand vs competitors, broken down by country, language, and AI engine”, the best tools are currently split between enterprise intelligence platforms and lighter GEO/AEO trackers. Verity Score Pierview

Best AI share-of-voice platforms for global markets

My shortlist by use case

For a multinational brand (20+ countries, multiple languages)

1. Peec AI — probably the strongest fit if your core question is:

“Are we winning AI recommendations in Germany vs France vs Japan vs the US?” Indexly

2. Profound — better if you need enterprise dashboards, governance, and large-scale reporting. Pierview
3. Evertune — better for market intelligence teams measuring category-level movement. Indexly

For a B2B SaaS company

• Peec AI
• Profound
• Hertz

Key requirements:

• country-level prompt sets
• local-language prompts
• competitor discovery
• citation/source analysis
• separate scores for ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc. Hertz

For agencies managing multiple clients

• Gensiv
• Otterly.AI
• Peec AI

Look for:

• white-label reports
• client dashboards
• prompt libraries
• historical trend data

Features I would insist on

Many tools call themselves “AI visibility” platforms, but for true geographic SOV comparison you want:

• ✅ Prompt-level tracking (not just a generic visibility score)
• ✅ Country targeting (US ≠ UK ≠ Australia)
• ✅ Language targeting (English ≠ Spanish ≠ German)
• ✅ Engine segmentation (ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Perplexity)
• ✅ Competitor share calculations
• ✅ Citation/source analysis
• ✅ Historical trends
• ✅ Raw answer capture so you can audit why you won/lost

A common mistake is measuring one English prompt set and assuming it represents global AI visibility; AI answers can vary significantly by language, market, and model. Promptwatch

If you tell me your situation (enterprise brand vs agency vs SaaS, number of countries/languages, and whether you care about ChatGPT only or all AI engines), I can narrow this to a top 2–3 recommendation.

For comparing AI share of voice (SOV) across geographic markets and languages, the best tools depend on whether you need enterprise market intelligence, multilingual coverage, or actionable GEO/AEO optimization. The strongest options today are:

My shortlist by use case

Best overall for global / multilingual brands

Peec AI

• Best fit if you need: “How does our AI visibility compare in Germany vs France vs Japan vs the US?”
• Particularly useful for language-level benchmarking and international teams. Indexly

Best for enterprise marketing intelligence

Profound or Evertune

• Better when you need: - thousands of tracked prompts
• competitor benchmarking
• executive dashboards
• historical trend analysis

AI Visibility Software Indexly### Best if you already run SEO programs

Semrush AI Visibility / Pi Datametrics

• Better when you want AI answers connected with: - search visibility
• SERP share of voice
• organic strategy

Pi Datametrics### Best for local-market / city-level comparisons

Look at tools that explicitly support geo segmentation, such as Gensiv or specialized AI visibility trackers that report by country, city, or market. Gensiv Hertz

Features I would require before buying

For a serious multinational program, make sure the platform can:

• Track the same prompt set across countries (not just translate prompts)
• Separate results by: - country
• language
• AI engine (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc.)
• Measure: - brand mentions
• citations/sources
• competitor mentions
• sentiment
• answer position
• Store historical snapshots (AI answers change frequently)
• Let you export data for dashboards

A common mistake is buying a tool that gives one global “AI visibility score.” For multinational brands, the useful insight is usually “we have 35% AI SOV in English US, 12% in French Canada, and 4% in German Germany”, not the blended average. Promptwatch

If you tell me your context (B2B SaaS, ecommerce, travel, finance, etc.), number of countries/languages, and whether you care about ChatGPT only or all AI engines, I can narrow this to the top 2–3 platforms.

If your specific goal is AI share of voice by geographic market and language, I’d narrow the field quite a bit. The important distinction is whether a platform can truly segment prompt → country/location → language → AI engine → competitor, rather than simply offering a multilingual dashboard.

My shortlist

Current comparisons put Profound, Peec and Otterly among the leading dedicated AI-visibility platforms, with meaningful differences in engine coverage and market segmentation. Ayzeo Bloomiro

1. Profound — my first choice for a global enterprise

If you're trying to answer something like:

"What's our AI share of voice for project-management software in Germany vs. France vs. the US, and how does that change between German, French and English prompts?"

Profound is where I'd start.

It is particularly strong for enterprise-grade reporting and citation/source analysis. Recent comparisons characterize it as the enterprise leader, with the broadest engine coverage at higher tiers. Bloomiro Marqeable

The key thing I'd demo is whether its location/language configuration matches your exact methodology. Don't accept "we support multiple languages" as sufficient—you want independent measurements for each market.

2. Peec AI — probably the best fit if multilingual SOV is the centerpiece

I'd put Peec AI very close to Profound if your organization is more mid-market.

It is particularly interesting for multibrand/multimarket monitoring, and independent comparisons describe it as a strong agency/mid-market choice. Bloomiro Loudmink

One useful signal: a July 2026 comparative test found substantial differences in citation share between English, Portuguese and Spanish markets—even for the same brands. That's exactly why I'd prioritize a tool that lets you slice the underlying measurements by market rather than giving you one global visibility score. GeoHero

3. Otterly — best if you want to get started cheaply

Otterly.AI is attractive if you want to build a serious measurement program without an enterprise contract.

Current comparisons put its entry pricing around $29/month, with substantially more prompt capacity at higher tiers. Ayzeo Marqeable

I'd choose it when you have, say, 5–20 markets and a manageable prompt set, rather than thousands of localized queries.

4. Semrush — best if you already live in the SEO ecosystem

If your team already uses Semrush, its AI Visibility tooling deserves a serious look. It gives you the advantage of combining traditional SEO data with AI visibility rather than maintaining two separate systems. Current comparisons include Semrush among the major AI-visibility platforms. Ayzeo Moistur AI

I'd favor it when the question is:

"How do AI visibility and Google visibility interact across markets?"

rather than purely:

"Give me the world's best AI SOV measurement system."

What I'd actually test in a vendor demo

For your use case, I wouldn't primarily compare dashboards. I'd give each vendor the same test matrix:

• 10 countries
• 5 languages
• 100 commercial prompts
• ChatGPT
• Google AI Overviews / AI Mode
• Gemini
• Claude
• Perplexity
• 10–20 competitors

Then ask them to produce:

AI Share of Voice = your brand mentions / total brand mentions across relevant answers

broken down by:

Country × Language × AI engine × Prompt category × Competitor

And critically, I'd want citation share separately from simple mention share.

For example:

France / French / ChatGPT / "best CRM for startups"
Brand A: 38% SOV
Brand B: 24%
Brand C: 18%
Brand D: 12%

Then:

France / English / ChatGPT / same intent
Brand A: 21%
Brand B: 34%
...

That second comparison is extremely valuable because language and market aren't interchangeable variables.

My ranking for your particular requirement

If I were buying specifically for global AI share-of-voice intelligence, I'd evaluate in this order:

1. Profound — best enterprise/global choice
2. Peec AI — strongest alternative if multilingual/multimarket monitoring is central
3. Otterly.AI — best cost-efficient option
4. Semrush AI Visibility — best if you want AI + conventional SEO in one stack
5. Scrunch AI — interesting enterprise option, particularly if you're already in the Sitecore ecosystem

One caveat: don't buy based on the vendor's claimed number of supported countries/languages. The real question is whether it actually runs localized queries against the localized version/model experience and preserves that data independently. That's where the products can differ substantially.

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages you need (e.g. 20 countries × 8 languages) and whether this is for an enterprise brand, agency, or SaaS company, I can give you a much more specific Profound vs Peec vs Otterly comparison, including estimated cost and which one I'd buy.

For example:

France / French / ChatGPT / "best CRM for startups"
Brand A: 38% SOV
Brand B: 24%
Brand C: 18%
Brand D: 12%

Then:

France / English / ChatGPT / same intent
Brand A: 21%
Brand B: 34%
...

That second comparison is extremely valuable because language and market aren't interchangeable variables.

My ranking for your particular requirement

If I were buying specifically for global AI share-of-voice intelligence, I'd evaluate in this order:

1. Profound — best enterprise/global choice
2. Peec AI — strongest alternative if multilingual/multimarket monitoring is central
3. Otterly.AI — best cost-efficient option
4. Semrush AI Visibility — best if you want AI + conventional SEO in one stack
5. Scrunch AI — interesting enterprise option, particularly if you're already in the Sitecore ecosystem

One caveat: don't buy based on the vendor's claimed number of supported countries/languages. The real question is whether it actually runs localized queries against the localized version/model experience and preserves that data independently. That's where the products can differ substantially.

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages you need (e.g. 20 countries × 8 languages) and whether this is for an enterprise brand, agency, or SaaS company, I can give you a much more specific Profound vs Peec vs Otterly comparison, including estimated cost and which one I'd buy.

4. Semrush — best if you already live in the SEO ecosystem

If your team already uses Semrush, its AI Visibility tooling deserves a serious look. It gives you the advantage of combining traditional SEO data with AI visibility rather than maintaining two separate systems. Current comparisons include Semrush among the major AI-visibility platforms.

I'd favor it when the question is:

"How do AI visibility and Google visibility interact across markets?"

rather than purely:

"Give me the world's best AI SOV measurement system."

What I'd actually test in a vendor demo

For your use case, I wouldn't primarily compare dashboards. I'd give each vendor the same test matrix:

If your priority is comparing AI share of voice across countries and languages, I’d shortlist these three:

1. scrunch.com — my pick for global SOV

Scrunch is particularly strong for your use case because you can combine country + language + AI platform + competitor + topic rather than treating AI visibility as one global number.

It supports prompts in any language used by the monitored AI platforms, and its country-level personas let you pair a language with a specific geography. It also calculates competitive presence/share of voice from actual AI responses. Scrunch Help Center Scrunch Help Center Scrunch

For example, you could build:

• US / English
• UK / English
• Germany / German
• France / French
• Japan / Japanese
• Brazil / Portuguese

…and compare Brand A vs. Brand B vs. Brand C SOV within each market.

It also lets you segment by AI platform, topic, funnel stage, persona, branded/non-branded prompts and geography. Scrunch

Best choice if you're running a multinational brand and want a market-by-market AI visibility dashboard.

2. otterly.ai — best price/feature balance

Otterly is probably the one I'd evaluate alongside Scrunch.

It explicitly supports 65+ countries and languages, with market-level reporting, competitor benchmarking, brand mentions, citations and SOV. Otterly Otterly

Its SOV reporting can be broken down by prompt, engine and market, which makes it useful for questions like:

"Why do we have 28% AI SOV in Germany but only 11% in France?"

It also tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, giving you reasonably broad answer-engine coverage. Otterly

Best choice if you want sophisticated international monitoring without going immediately into a heavyweight enterprise platform.

3. tryprofound.com — best for enterprise analytics

Profound is worth considering if this is going into a large organization's GEO/AEO reporting stack.

Its dashboards expose Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, with filters for regions, platforms, topics, personas and tags. Profound Its analytics can also compare SOV across regions and topics. Profound Knowledge Base

I'd favor Profound when you need more sophisticated reporting, workflows and enterprise-scale analysis rather than simply monitoring international SOV.

My ranking for your specific requirement

If the question is specifically "Which software is best for measuring AI SOV across geographic markets and languages?"

1. Scrunch — strongest fit for granular country × language × AI-platform analysis
2. OtterlyAI — excellent alternative, particularly attractive for broad country/language coverage
3. Profound — strongest if enterprise reporting/workflows matter more than pure market comparison

One important distinction: don't evaluate these tools based only on the number of AI engines they monitor. For international SOV, I'd put much more weight on whether you can run the same intent set independently in each country and language, from a geographically appropriate context, and then compare competitors on exactly the same prompt universe.

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages, number of brands/competitors, and whether you're an agency or an in-house team, I can narrow this to the best 1–2 and compare pricing, prompt limits, API access, geo fidelity, language support, and reporting.

It explicitly supports 65+ countries and languages, with market-level reporting, competitor benchmarking, brand mentions, citations and SOV. Otterly Otterly

Its SOV reporting can be broken down by prompt, engine and market, which makes it useful for questions like:

"Why do we have 28% AI SOV in Germany but only 11% in France?"

It also tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, giving you reasonably broad answer-engine coverage.

Best choice if you want sophisticated international monitoring without going immediately into a heavyweight enterprise platform.

If by AI share of voice you mean “What percentage of relevant AI-generated answers mention/recommend my brand versus competitors, broken down by country, city, language, model, and topic?”, there are a few strong options in 2026.

My shortlist

1. Profound — best for serious global benchmarking

Profound is probably my first choice if you're comparing many countries + languages + AI engines.

It supports SOV/visibility analysis by platform, region, country/city, language, topic and prompt, with daily prompt execution. Profound Profound Knowledge Base

Its dashboards can specifically report Share of Voice, Visibility Score, Average Position and Citation Rank, with filters for regions and platforms. Profound

It also has a particularly useful Profound Index, which benchmarks brands using visibility, SOV, mention position, citation share, co-citation and co-mention metrics. Profound

I'd pick Profound if: you're a global enterprise, agency, or SEO/AEO team and need defensible reporting across dozens of markets.

2. Peec AI — best balance of usability and geographic coverage

Peec AI is the one I'd demo first if you don't need all of Profound's enterprise machinery.

It explicitly measures visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice, including competitor comparisons. Peec AI

The particularly relevant part for your question: Peec says you can track queries across supported countries and languages without an additional charge per region/language; pricing is based primarily on prompt/model usage. Peec AI Peec AI

You can also segment visibility by model, country and prompt tags, making things like US vs UK, English vs German, or ChatGPT vs Gemini comparisons straightforward. Peec AI

I'd pick Peec if: you want a clean dashboard where marketers can quickly answer “Are we winning AI search in Germany, France and the US?”

3. Uberall GEO Studio — if "geographic" means actual locations

This is the interesting outlier.

Uberall's GEO Studio is designed around location-level AI visibility, rather than simply treating Germany or Canada as one geographic bucket. Uberall specifically contrasts this with Profound's brand/topic-level approach and says GEO Studio can report AI SOV for individual locations across markets. Uberall Uberall

That makes it particularly compelling for:

• Retail chains
• Restaurants
• Hotels
• Banks
• Healthcare networks
• Dealerships
• Franchises
• Any business with hundreds/thousands of locations

I'd pick Uberall if: you mean “What is our AI SOV in Toronto vs Vancouver vs Montreal vs Ottawa?”, rather than simply Canada vs US.

One important distinction

Be careful when vendors say they support "geographies." There are really three different levels:

1. Country/language — US English vs Canadian English vs French Canada.
2. City/region — Toronto vs Montreal vs Vancouver.
3. Individual location / geo-grid — “Which of our 400 stores gets recommended when someone asks an AI for the best option nearby?”

Profound and Peec are excellent for #1 and #2. If #3 is central to your use case, Uberall deserves a very close look. Uberall

What I'd choose

• Global enterprise / 20+ markets: Profound
• Marketing team / straightforward SOV dashboard: Peec AI
• Multi-location brand: Uberall GEO Studio
• Agency: Peec or Profound, depending on reporting/scale
• Need the deepest competitive intelligence: Profound

If you tell me how many countries/languages you need, whether you care about city-level results, and which AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, etc.), I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and compare their actual geographic/language capabilities and pricing.

It also has a particularly useful Profound Index, which benchmarks brands using visibility, SOV, mention position, citation share, co-citation and co-mention metrics. Profound

I'd pick Profound if: you're a global enterprise, agency, or SEO/AEO team and need defensible reporting across dozens of markets.

2. Peec AI — best balance of usability and geographic coverage

Peec AI is the one I'd demo first if you don't need all of Profound's enterprise machinery.

It explicitly measures visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice, including competitor comparisons. Peec AI

The particularly relevant part for your question: Peec says you can track queries across supported countries and languages without an additional charge per region/language; pricing is based primarily on prompt/model usage. Peec AI Peec AI

You can also segment visibility by model, country and prompt tags, making things like US vs UK, English vs German, or ChatGPT vs Gemini comparisons straightforward. Peec AI

I'd pick Peec if: you want a clean dashboard where marketers can quickly answer “Are we winning AI search in Germany, France and the US?”

3. Uberall GEO Studio — if "geographic" means actual locations

This is the interesting outlier.

If your priority is comparing AI share of voice across countries and languages, I’d shortlist these:

1. Profound — my first choice

Profound is probably the closest match if you need a global AI SOV operating system, rather than just an AI rank tracker.

Its Answer Engine Insights supports Share of Voice, visibility, citations and positioning, with filters for regions, platforms, prompts, topics and personas. More importantly for your question, Profound says it supports 30+ languages and 150+ regions. Profound Profound Knowledge Base

You can therefore construct something like:

Brand × Country × Language × AI engine × Topic × Competitor → AI Share of Voice

It also has a dashboard specifically designed for SOV reporting and filtering by regions. Profound

Best if: you're a multinational brand and want to answer questions such as “Why are we 31% SOV in Germany but only 8% in France?”

2. Peec AI — particularly good for country comparisons

Peec is the one I'd demo alongside Profound.

It explicitly tracks visibility, position, sentiment and Share of Voice, and lets you benchmark competitors across AI engines. Peec AI

What's particularly relevant is its country-gap workflow: Peec can break brand visibility and SOV down by country code, then identify which competitor dominates each market. Peec AI

Best if: your main question is “Which countries are we losing AI visibility in, and to whom?”

3. Semrush — best if you want AI + conventional search

If your organization already uses Semrush, I'd seriously consider consolidating there. Semrush has been moving aggressively into AI Visibility/GEO while retaining its traditional international SEO capabilities. MarketsandMarkets

The advantage isn't necessarily that its AI SOV measurement is superior to Profound/Peec; it's that you can compare:

Google organic SOV → AI SOV → traffic → competitors

within a broader search intelligence stack.

One important caveat

Don't treat "AI Share of Voice" as a standardized industry metric. Different vendors calculate it differently. For example, Profound defines SOV as your brand's mentions divided by total brand mentions across the tracked answers, while other vendors use position-weighted or impression-like methodologies. Profound Knowledge Base Verity Score

For a serious multinational measurement program, I'd therefore insist that the vendor lets you inspect:

• Exact prompts being measured
• Country/locale used when querying the model
• Language of the prompt and language of the answer
• AI engine/model
• Competitor set
• Raw answer/mention data
• SOV calculation methodology
• Sampling frequency
• Historical data
• Ability to export data/API it
• Consistent prompt sets across markets

Otherwise, an apparent "France vs Germany SOV gap" can partly be a measurement-design artifact.

My ranking for your specific requirement

If you're evaluating software today:

1. 🥇 Profound — strongest fit for enterprise, multilingual, multi-country AI SOV
2. 🥈 Peec AI — excellent for country-by-country competitor gaps and easier operational analysis
3. 🥉 Semrush — strongest if AI visibility needs to sit alongside international SEO
4. Similarweb — especially interesting if market/traffic intelligence matters as much as SOV
5. OtterlyAI — good if you want a more lightweight monitoring solution

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages you need (e.g. 10 vs 50), your company size, and whether you care about ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/Perplexity/Google AI Overviews, I can narrow this to 2–3 platforms and compare their actual geographic, language, prompt, API, and enterprise capabilities.

You can therefore construct something like:

Brand × Country × Language × AI engine × Topic × Competitor → AI Share of Voice

It also has a dashboard specifically designed for SOV reporting and filtering by regions. Profound

Best if: you're a multinational brand and want to answer questions such as “Why are we 31% SOV in Germany but only 8% in France?”

2. Peec AI — particularly good for country comparisons

Peec is the one I'd demo alongside Profound.

It explicitly tracks visibility, position, sentiment and Share of Voice, and lets you benchmark competitors across AI engines. Peec AI

What's particularly relevant is its country-gap workflow: Peec can break brand visibility and SOV down by country code, then identify which competitor dominates each market. Peec AI

Best if: your main question is “Which countries are we losing AI visibility in, and to whom?”

3. Semrush — best if you want AI + conventional search

If your organization already uses Semrush, I'd seriously consider consolidating there. Semrush has been moving aggressively into AI Visibility/GEO while retaining its traditional international SEO capabilities. MarketsandMarkets

The advantage isn't necessarily that its AI SOV measurement is superior to Profound/Peec; it's that you can compare:

Google organic SOV → AI SOV → traffic → competitors

within a broader search intelligence stack.

One important caveat

Don't treat "AI Share of Voice" as a standardized industry metric. Different vendors calculate it differently. For example, Profound defines SOV as your brand's mentions divided by total brand mentions across the tracked answers, while other vendors use position-weighted or impression-like methodologies.

For a serious multinational measurement program, I'd therefore insist that the vendor lets you inspect:

If your core requirement is AI share of voice by country + language + competitor, I’d shortlist these:

My top 3

1. Profound — best overall for serious global benchmarking

Profound is probably where I'd start if you're evaluating this for a multinational brand. Its current offering emphasizes cross-market brand visibility, and its 2026 index is based on 1.9B+ real user conversations across 50+ industries and major answer engines. Profound

The particularly important thing is that you're not merely asking "does ChatGPT mention us?" You can ask something closer to:

What is our AI share of voice for category X in Germany, in German, versus competitors—and how does that compare with the US/English market?

That cross-market comparison is the capability I'd prioritize.

2. LLM Pulse — best if country/language slicing is the primary requirement

LLM Pulse is unusually explicit about this use case: it lets you run prompts across multiple countries and languages and compare how models answer the same question in each market. It also supports per-brand/per-region projects and consistent metrics flowing into BI tools. LLM Pulse

That makes it particularly attractive if you're building a global dashboard such as:

Brand → Country → Language → AI engine → Prompt cluster → SOV → Competitor

3. Signal 360 — best published breadth for multilingual coverage

Signal 360 currently advertises 25+ markets and 30+ languages, with eight AI engines and explicit share-of-voice tracking against competitors. Signal 360

If your biggest problem is lots of languages/markets, I'd put this high on the evaluation list.

One important caveat

Don't choose purely based on the number of countries/languages advertised. The critical question is whether the platform actually localizes the AI query, rather than merely attaching a country/language label to an otherwise identical prompt.

For example, you want to distinguish:

• "best CRM for German SMBs" asked in German from Germany
• "best CRM for German SMBs" asked in English from Germany
• "beste CRM-Software für deutsche KMU" asked in German from Germany

Those can produce materially different competitive landscapes.

You also want localized SERP/AI context, local competitors, and ideally multiple runs because AI answers are nondeterministic. A 2026 methodology comparison specifically recommends using many prompts and multiple runs per prompt/market rather than treating one AI response as definitive. Verity Score

If I were buying today

I'd run an RFP/POC with Profound + LLM Pulse + Signal 360, and score them on:

1. True country localization
2. True language localization
3. SOV methodology and reproducibility
4. Number of prompts/runs you can afford
5. ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Claude / Google AI coverage
6. Local competitor discovery
7. Citation-share analysis
8. Ability to export raw answer-level data
9. API/BI integration
10. Historical data and trend comparisons
11. Multi-brand / multi-market permissions
12. Whether you can compare US English vs UK English vs German vs French vs Japanese, etc.

For a global enterprise, my initial ranking would be: Profound → LLM Pulse → Signal 360 → Qwairy → Searchable.

Qwairy is particularly interesting if you're managing a very large portfolio: it advertises 100+ countries and 10+ languages, multi-brand dashboards, and drill-downs by brand, region, language, and AI engine. Qwairy

If you tell me your industry, number of countries/languages, approximate prompt volume, and whether this is for enterprise procurement or a smaller team, I can narrow this to the 2–3 platforms I'd actually demo, including pricing and a feature-by-feature comparison.

2. LLM Pulse — best if country/language slicing is the primary requirement

LLM Pulse is unusually explicit about this use case: it lets you run prompts across multiple countries and languages and compare how models answer the same question in each market. It also supports per-brand/per-region projects and consistent metrics flowing into BI tools. LLM Pulse

That makes it particularly attractive if you're building a global dashboard such as:

Brand → Country → Language → AI engine → Prompt cluster → SOV → Competitor

3. Signal 360 — best published breadth for multilingual coverage

Signal 360 currently advertises 25+ markets and 30+ languages, with eight AI engines and explicit share-of-voice tracking against competitors. signal360.ai

If your biggest problem is lots of languages/markets, I'd put this high on the evaluation list.

One important caveat

Don't choose purely based on the number of countries/languages advertised. The critical question is whether the platform actually localizes the AI query, rather than merely attaching a country/language label to an otherwise identical prompt.

For example, you want to distinguish:

If your specific requirement is AI share of voice by geographic market and language, I’d narrow the field pretty aggressively. The best options in 2026 are:

1. Peec AI — my first choice

peec.ai

This is probably the closest match to what you're describing. Peec emphasizes competitor share-of-voice, sentiment, citations, and 100+ languages with country-level breakdowns. It also has API/CSV/Looker Studio capabilities, which matters if you're going to build a global AI-search dashboard. Loudmink

I'd shortlist it if you want to answer questions like:

• What is our AI SOV in US vs Germany vs France vs Japan?
• How does SOV change when the prompt is asked in English vs German vs French?
• Which competitors gain visibility in each market?
• Which AI engines behave differently by market?
• Which sources are responsible for our visibility in each country?

Best fit: multinational B2B, SaaS, ecommerce, or agency teams where multilingual/country comparison is a core requirement.

2. Profound — best for enterprise-scale intelligence

tryprofound.com

I'd choose Profound over Peec if you're a large enterprise and care about very deep AI-search analytics, large prompt sets, citation/source intelligence, and broad engine coverage. Current comparisons put it at the enterprise end of the market, with substantially deeper analytics than the inexpensive trackers. Sapian Metrics Marqeable

The tradeoff is that it can be substantially more expensive, and some of the strongest capabilities sit behind higher tiers/custom enterprise arrangements.

Best fit: global brands with dedicated SEO/GEO teams and a serious data/analytics requirement.

3. Otterly — good if cost matters

otterly.ai

Otterly is compelling if you want a relatively inexpensive way to establish an AI-SOV baseline. It tracks major AI surfaces, competitor mentions and citations, but its analytics are generally less sophisticated than Peec or Profound. licheo.com Marqeable

Best fit: one or a few markets, smaller prompt sets, or a team experimenting with GEO before committing to an enterprise platform.

What I'd actually buy

If geographic × language comparison is the primary requirement, my ranking would be:

Peec → Profound → Otterly

The important distinction is that I wouldn't select a tool merely because it says it supports "multiple countries." You want the underlying data structured something like:

Brand × competitor × engine × country × language × prompt × date

That lets you calculate a genuinely useful AI SOV rather than a generic "visibility score."

For example:

That market × language × engine matrix is much more actionable than one global AI visibility number.

One other important consideration: AI responses are nondeterministic, so a serious measurement system should run prompts repeatedly and report trends/ranges rather than treating one answer as ground truth. Verity Score

If you tell me your approximate number of countries/languages (e.g. 10 countries × 5 languages) and whether this is B2B, ecommerce, or local SEO, I can give you a much more specific shortlist—including which platform has the best geographic/language granularity and API/reporting for that setup.

If your core requirement is AI share of voice (SOV) by geographic market × language × prompt set, I’d narrow the field to Profound, Peec AI, and Otterly.ai, with Profound the strongest choice for a large multinational.

My ranking

1. Profound — best overall for global enterprises

This would be my first demo if you're trying to answer questions such as:

“What percentage of AI answers recommend us in Germany vs. France vs. the US, and how does that change when the prompt is asked in German vs. English?”

Profound is positioned toward enterprise-scale AI visibility, with broad engine coverage, competitive SOV, citation/source analysis, and deeper analytics. Current comparisons put it at the top end of the market for enterprise analytics. Ayzeo AnswerManiac

Why I'd choose it: if you have dozens of markets, thousands of prompts, multiple competitors, and need historical reporting, this is the category's strongest enterprise option.

Potential downside: expensive and more sales-led than the self-serve alternatives.

2. Peec AI — probably the best value for a global marketing team

Peec is particularly interesting if SOV is the KPI you care about most rather than building a huge enterprise intelligence stack. Independent comparisons specifically highlight its competitive share-of-voice capabilities and multi-country tracking. Ayzeo GEO Agency

I'd shortlist it if you're managing, say:

• 10–30 countries
• multiple languages
• 50–500 strategic prompts per market
• 5–20 competitors
• regular market-by-market SOV reporting

It is considerably easier to justify than an enterprise Profound deployment if you're a marketing team rather than a huge global organization.

3. Otterly.ai — best inexpensive starting point

Otterly is compelling if you want to prove the business case before spending heavily. It tracks mentions, citations, competitors and SOV across major AI surfaces, but its analytics are shallower than Profound. licheo.com Omid Saffari

I'd use it for a pilot rather than a sophisticated global measurement program.

4. Scrunch AI

Worth including in an enterprise RFP, particularly if you want the platform to go beyond measurement into diagnosing and improving AI visibility. Current comparisons put it in the higher-priced enterprise tier. Ayzeo Stork.AI

The feature I'd scrutinize most

Don't just ask vendors whether they support “countries” and “languages.” There are three different dimensions you want them to demonstrate:

Market: US / UK / Germany / France / Japan, etc.

Prompt language: English / German / French / Japanese, etc.

AI-search location: the geographic context presented to the model.

Those aren't necessarily equivalent. A tool saying “we support Germany” doesn't necessarily mean you can run the same German prompt with a German-localized AI experience and compare it against the equivalent French prompt in France.

I'd make vendors run this exact test in the demo:

Same 100 commercial-intent prompts × 10 countries × native language, across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity. Show me brand SOV, competitor SOV, citations, sentiment, and trend over time, with results segmented by country and language.

If they can't show that natively, I'd be cautious.

My recommendation

If this is a serious multinational measurement program: Profound.

If you're a marketing/SEO team looking for the best balance of SOV analytics, geographic tracking and cost: Peec AI.

If you're testing the category or have a modest budget: Otterly.ai.

One other option worth investigating is ReachLLM, which explicitly positions itself around AI-search visibility across multi-brand enterprises and combines measurement with diagnosis/execution; its current plans start at $399/month. ReachLLM

If you tell me how many countries/languages, approximate number of prompts, and which AI engines matter most, I can give you a much tighter 3–5 vendor shortlist and an RFP-style feature matrix specifically for global AI SOV.

If your main requirement is AI share of voice by country + language, rather than generic “AI visibility,” I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation

For a serious global market-by-market program, I'd start with Profound, Qwairy, and Semrush.

1. Profound — best overall

It is particularly strong if you want to answer questions like:

“What is our AI SOV in Germany vs. France vs. the US, for the same buying-intent prompts, and which competitors are taking the share we're losing?”

It's more enterprise-oriented than the lightweight trackers, and current comparisons consistently put Profound among the leading dedicated AI-visibility platforms. foglift.io

2. Qwairy — best for geographic/language granularity

This is the one I'd investigate first if internationalization is the core requirement. Qwairy explicitly advertises monitoring across 100+ countries and 10+ languages, with drill-down by brand, region, language, and AI engine. www.qwairy.co

3. Semrush — best if you want AI SOV integrated with traditional search

Semrush's enterprise AI visibility product lets you drill from global SOV down to markets, cities, products, and prompts, and benchmark competitors across engines. enterprise.semrush.com

One important distinction

Don't evaluate these tools solely on whether they say “countries” and “languages.” For your use case, I'd test whether they can maintain a controlled prompt matrix, e.g.:

Brand × country × language × AI engine × intent × competitor

For example:

• US / English / ChatGPT / “best CRM for mid-market”
• France / French / ChatGPT / equivalent localized query
• Germany / German / Gemini / equivalent query
• Japan / Japanese / Perplexity / equivalent query

Then calculate SOV within each market, rather than combining all markets into one global score.

That matters because a global 35% SOV can conceal something like 55% US / 38% UK / 19% France / 7% Japan.

I'd also look closely at how the vendor defines SOV. Some count brand mentions, others weight position/recommendation, and others emphasize citations. Those can produce materially different rankings. Otterly, for example, defines SOV as your share of brand mentions versus competitors across tracked prompts. help.otterly.ai

If you tell me your industry, number of countries/languages, and whether you're tracking ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini/AI Overviews, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best platforms and compare their actual geo/language capabilities and pricing.

If your specific requirement is AI share of voice by geographic market and language, I’d narrow the field to Profound and Peec AI, with Otterly.AI as the lower-cost option.

My ranking

🥇 Best overall: tryprofound.com

For a multinational brand, this would be my first demo.

Profound explicitly supports filtering AI visibility/share of voice by regions, platforms, prompts, topics and personas, and its reporting/API can break SOV down by region and model. Profound Profound Profound Knowledge Base

Its current product also goes beyond a simple "mentioned/not mentioned" metric: visibility, SOV, position, citation share, co-citation and co-mention can all be analyzed. Profound

That's particularly valuable if you want something like:

US / English: 28% SOV
Germany / German: 14%
France / French: 21%
Japan / Japanese: 7%
Brazil / Portuguese: 32%

…and then compare each market against the same 5–10 competitors.

Profound's current research product is also explicitly focused on cross-market brand visibility, including whether US positioning predicts European visibility. Profound

🥈 Best balance: peec.ai

I'd look very closely at Peec if your main objective is competitive SOV benchmarking rather than a huge enterprise analytics stack.

It tracks visibility, position, sentiment and SOV across AI engines and provides side-by-side competitor comparisons. Peec AI

More importantly for your question, Peec has a specific country-level market-gap workflow that pulls visibility and SOV by country code and identifies which competitor dominates each market. Peec AI

So if your core question is:

"Where are we losing AI visibility to competitors?"

Peec is particularly compelling.

🥉 Budget option: otterly.ai

Otterly is worth considering if you want to get monitoring running cheaply and don't need the same depth of enterprise analysis.

Current comparisons put its entry pricing around $29/month, with higher tiers for substantially more prompts. Marqeable

The tradeoff is that international/linguistic segmentation and enterprise-grade analysis aren't as compelling as Profound or Peec.

What I'd actually buy

If you're evaluating this for a global marketing/SEO organization, I'd run a bake-off between:

1. Profound — strongest choice for a global "AI market intelligence" system.
2. Peec AI — strongest challenger if SOV-by-country and competitor benchmarking are the primary requirements.
3. Otterly — include only if price/volume efficiency is important.

The key thing I'd test in the demos isn't the headline "number of countries/languages." Ask each vendor to demonstrate this exact report:

Brand × Competitor × Country × Language × AI engine × Prompt category → Visibility + SOV + Position + Citations

For example:

That dimensionality is the real differentiator. A lot of GEO tools can claim "global" or "multilingual" while making it difficult to get a genuinely apples-to-apples market comparison.

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages, number of brands/competitors, and whether this is for an enterprise or agency, I can give you a much tighter Profound vs Peec vs Otterly recommendation, including likely pricing and the exact questions I'd ask in the demos.

…and then compare each market against the same 5–10 competitors.

Profound's current research product is also explicitly focused on cross-market brand visibility, including whether US positioning predicts European visibility. Profound

🥈 Best balance: peec.ai

I'd look very closely at Peec if your main objective is competitive SOV benchmarking rather than a huge enterprise analytics stack.

It tracks visibility, position, sentiment and SOV across AI engines and provides side-by-side competitor comparisons. peec.ai

More importantly for your question, Peec has a specific country-level market-gap workflow that pulls visibility and SOV by country code and identifies which competitor dominates each market. peec.ai

So if your core question is:

"Where are we losing AI visibility to competitors?"

Peec is particularly compelling.

If by AI share of voice you mean “Across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, etc., how often does my brand appear versus competitors—and how does that change by country, language, and prompt?”, I’d shortlist these:

Recent comparisons consistently put Profound at the enterprise end, Peec in the mid-market sweet spot, and Otterly as the inexpensive entry point. ayzeo.comgenerative.qa

My recommendation

For a multinational brand, I'd start with Profound. Its advantage isn't merely tracking whether you're mentioned; it's the ability to analyze large prompt sets, competitors, citations/sources, and AI visibility at enterprise scale. That's much closer to the question “What's our AI SOV in Germany vs. France vs. the US, in German vs. French vs. English?” than a basic AI-ranking tracker. generative.qa

Peec AI is the one I'd demo alongside it. It's particularly strong on competitor share-of-voice and is generally much more accessible for an in-house marketing team. generative.qa

One important buying criterion

Don't just ask vendors whether they support "countries" or "languages." Ask them to demonstrate:

1. Country-level prompt localization — e.g. US, UK, Germany, France, Japan.
2. Language-specific prompts — native German/French/Japanese rather than translated English prompts.
3. Local SERP/AI behavior — especially Google AI Overviews/AI Mode.
4. Competitor SOV by market — not just your aggregate visibility score.
5. Citation/source SOV — which domains are causing competitors to win.
6. Historical trends — SOV by market/language over time.
7. Prompt-level exports/API — essential if you want to combine AI SOV with your own market, revenue, or SEO data.

That distinction matters: a tool can technically support 10 countries while giving you only a superficial global visibility score.

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages you need (e.g. 5 countries/3 languages vs. 30 countries/15 languages), I can narrow this to the 2–3 strongest options and compare their geographic/language capabilities and pricing.

If your specific requirement is AI share of voice (SOV) by country and language, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: Peec AI

For your use case, Peec is probably the strongest fit.

It explicitly calculates Share of Voice against competitors, rather than merely measuring whether you're mentioned, and its reporting can break performance down by country, AI model, topic and competitor. peec.aisupport.conductor.com

It also supports a substantial range of languages, including English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Arabic, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese, Hebrew and others. peec.ai

The particularly useful distinction is:

• Visibility = % of AI responses where you're mentioned
• SOV = your mentions ÷ all tracked brand mentions
• Position = where you tend to appear
• Sentiment = how positively you're described

That makes it much better for a question like "What's our AI SOV in Germany vs. France vs. the US, and which competitor is taking share from us?" than tools that primarily report generic AI visibility. peec.ai

OtterlyAI is the strongest alternative

If breadth of geographic coverage is the priority, I'd seriously consider OtterlyAI. It currently supports 65+ countries, and its monitoring accepts prompts in any language, while maintaining the selected country context. help.otterly.aiotterly.aipeec.aihelpcenter.scrunchai.com

It also explicitly supports market-by-market visibility/SOV analysis and tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Copilot and other AI search environments. otterly.ai

One advantage: countries/languages don't incur a separate pricing charge in the same way that prompt/model usage does on Peec; Peec says pricing is based on prompts/models rather than number of regions or languages. peec.ai

Scrunch is worth looking at for enterprise

Scrunch is particularly interesting if you care about the actual sources and citations behind SOV, not just the score. It supports prompts in any language and lets you pair language with country-level personas. helpcenter.scrunchai.com

It currently monitors nine major AI platforms, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok and Meta AI. helpcenter.scrunchai.com

One important caveat

Don't treat "global SOV" as a single meaningful number. For multilingual brands, I'd structure the measurement as:

Market × language × AI engine × intent × competitor

For example:

Germany × German × ChatGPT × commercial × Brand A vs. Brand B

versus

Germany × English × ChatGPT × commercial × Brand A vs. Brand B

That's important because AI engines can behave very differently across languages. Peec's research, for example, found substantial English-language retrieval even when users submit non-English ChatGPT queries. peec.ai

Bottom line:
Peec → best choice if SOV by market + language + competitor is the core job.
OtterlyAI → best if you want very broad country coverage and strong value.
Scrunch → best if you need deeper enterprise analysis of citations and AI sources.
Conductor → best if you're already heavily invested in enterprise SEO and want AI SOV inside that ecosystem; its current product has dedicated AI-search SOV visualizations. support.conductor.com

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages, number of brands/competitors, and whether this is for an enterprise SEO team or an agency, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their pricing, limits, AI engines, geo granularity, and API/export capabilities.

If your goal is specifically AI share of voice by country/market and language, I’d shortlist these:

Recent comparisons consistently put Profound, Peec, and Otterly among the leading dedicated AI-visibility platforms, while Ahrefs and Semrush are increasingly competitive as broader SEO suites. loudmink.ai

My ranking for your particular use case

1. Profound — best if you're managing many countries

I'd start here if you need something like:

US / English vs Germany / German vs France / French vs Japan / Japanese
→ AI visibility → share of voice → competitors → citations → sentiment → trend over time.

Profound is particularly compelling when you need large prompt sets, segmentation, enterprise reporting, and comparisons across markets. Recent 2026 comparisons characterize it as the deepest enterprise analytics option. loudmink.ai

2. Peec AI — probably the best fit for a marketing team

Peec is attractive if the central question is:

“What's our AI share of voice versus competitors in each market?”

It emphasizes competitor benchmarking and mention/share-of-voice tracking, and recent testing found it particularly useful for quantifying the ratio between a brand and its market leader. generative.qawww.roberto-serra.com

3. Otterly.ai — best if you want cheaper, granular monitoring

I'd choose Otterly if you don't need the full enterprise analytics layer. One useful differentiator is its emphasis on the actual URLs being cited and the context of those citations, rather than just whether the brand appeared. generative.qawww.roberto-serra.com

The important caveat

For international AI SOV, don't buy based simply on the number of “languages supported.”

You want the platform to let you independently vary at least:

• Country / market — US, UK, DE, FR, JP, etc.
• Language — English, German, French, Japanese, etc.
• AI engine — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, etc.
• Prompt set — identical intent translated/localized appropriately
• Competitor set
• Location context — ideally the query is actually executed in the target market, rather than merely translated
• Share of voice methodology — because vendors don't calculate SOV identically. verityscore.io

That last point is surprisingly important: “AI share of voice” isn't a standardized metric. Different vendors weight mentions, position, impressions, citations, etc. differently. verityscore.io

What I'd buy

If you're a large multinational / enterprise: Profound.

If you're a mid-market/global marketing or SEO team: Peec AI.

If you're testing the category or have a smaller budget: Otterly.ai.

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages you need (e.g. 10 countries × 6 languages) and whether you care about ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity/Google AI separately, I can narrow this to the 2–3 tools that actually support that setup, including current pricing and a feature-by-feature comparison.

If your core requirement is AI share of voice by geographic market and language, I’d shortlist these three:

My recommendation

1. Similarweb — best if you're doing this at a multinational/enterprise level.

Similarweb's AI Search Intelligence explicitly measures brand mention share (AI share of voice), visibility, prompts, citations and sentiment across AI engines. Its big advantage is connecting AI visibility with broader market and traffic intelligence rather than treating GEO as an isolated dashboard. www.similarweb.com

That's particularly useful if the question you're asking is:

"What's our AI SOV in Germany vs. France vs. the US, and does that correspond to our market position, search demand and AI referral traffic?"

I'd start here for a global brand.

2. Profound — best if AI SOV itself is the main KPI.

Profound is particularly strong for competitive share-of-voice across markets, regions and product lines, with granular AEO analytics and broad AI-engine coverage. www.similarweb.com

I'd favor it over Similarweb if your team already has analytics/SEO infrastructure and wants a dedicated GEO intelligence layer rather than a broader digital-intelligence platform.

3. OtterlyAI — probably the best fit for your exact geo × language use case.

This is the one I'd investigate first if you want something operationally simple.

Otterly currently supports 65+ countries, and you can run the same prompt in different country contexts. It also supports prompts in all languages, querying the AI engine in the language you've entered. help.otterly.ai

So you can construct something like:

Product category × English × US
Product category × German × Germany
Product category × French × France
Product category × Spanish × Spain
Product category × Spanish × Mexico
Product category × Portuguese × Brazil

…and compare visibility, mentions/SOV, competitors and citations across those cells.

That's much closer to the actual question a global SEO/GEO team needs to answer.

One important distinction

Don't buy a tool merely because it says it has "AI visibility."

For your use case, I'd require these dimensions:

Brand × competitor × prompt × AI engine × country × language × time

Then calculate/report:

• Share of voice
• Mention rate / visibility
• Competitive rank
• Sentiment
• Citation share
• Which domains/pages are generating your visibility
• Which competitors gain SOV in each market
• Change over time
• AI engine differences

This matters because visibility ≠ share of voice. A brand can appear in 30% of relevant AI answers while owning only 10% of the total brand mentions because several competitors are mentioned alongside it. Similarweb explicitly distinguishes these two metrics. www.similarweb.comwww.similarweb.compeec.ai

If I were buying today

Enterprise multinational: Similarweb → Profound
Global SEO/GEO team: OtterlyAI → Peec AI
Heavy multilingual research: OtterlyAI or Peec AI
Need AI visibility tied to traffic/business intelligence: Similarweb
Need deepest dedicated GEO analytics: Profound

One other reason I'd take the geo/language dimension seriously: Peec's recent research across 20 countries found substantial differences in how AI engines use translated/local sources in non-English markets. In other words, "US English SOV" is not a reliable proxy for "German SOV" or "Brazilian Portuguese SOV." peec.ai

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages, number of brands/competitors, and whether this is for SEO, brand, or market intelligence, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare their actual geo/language capabilities and pricing.

If your core requirement is AI share of voice (SoV) by country × language × AI engine, I’d shortlist these:

My #1: Peec AI

For your exact use case, Peec is probably where I'd start. Its SoV metric explicitly measures your share of brand mentions versus tracked competitors, and it has tooling specifically for identifying which geographic markets competitors dominate. docs.peec.ai

The important distinction is that you don't just want "does ChatGPT mention us?" You want something closer to:

US / English / ChatGPT → 31% SoV
Germany / German / ChatGPT → 18% SoV
France / French / ChatGPT → 24% SoV
Japan / Japanese / ChatGPT → 7% SoV

…and then the same comparison across competitors and engines.

That's the level at which I'd evaluate these platforms.

Scrunch is arguably better for sophisticated market analysis

Scrunch is particularly compelling if you need to understand why SoV differs between markets. It supports prompts in any language and lets you pair language with country-level personas. Its reporting can be segmented by country, AI platform, prompt topic, persona, funnel stage, and competitor. helpcenter.scrunchai.com

It also measures SoV from actual AI responses rather than estimating it, and supports eight major AI platforms according to its current documentation. ai-cdn.scrunchai.com

So I'd choose Scrunch over Peec if your team is asking questions like:

• Why do we win in Germany but lose in France?
• Which local publishers are causing the difference?
• Is the problem our French content or the competitive landscape?
• Which competitors gain SoV specifically in Spanish prompts?
• Does ChatGPT behave differently from Gemini/Perplexity in each market?

Otterly is the value option

Otterly is worth serious consideration if you need lots of countries without enterprise-level spend. Its current documentation says it supports 65+ countries, with region-specific monitoring across multiple AI platforms. help.otterly.ai

It also explicitly supports running the same prompts across countries so you can compare regional visibility and local competitors. help.otterly.ai

I'd pick it when the requirement is primarily:

"Give me a global AI rank/visibility dashboard at a reasonable price."

rather than:

"Give my international SEO/GEO team a sophisticated market-intelligence system."

Profound

I'd put Profound on the enterprise shortlist if you're a large multinational. It's one of the stronger platforms for broad AI-search analytics and competitive benchmarking; current comparisons characterize it as particularly strong for enterprise analytics and engine breadth. www.trylyra.ai

But if country × language is the central buying criterion rather than just one dimension of AI visibility, I'd demo Peec and Scrunch first.

My ranking for your specific requirement

1. Peec AI — best overall for international SoV
2. Scrunch — best for deep geo/language segmentation and analysis
3. Profound — best enterprise-grade broader AI intelligence
4. Otterly — best value/global monitoring

One important caveat: don't compare vendors based solely on their number of "languages supported." What matters is whether they actually execute the prompt in that language from the target geography, capture the resulting answer/citations, and let you normalize the comparison across markets. Scrunch explicitly supports this country + language pairing, for example. helpcenter.scrunchai.com

If you're buying this for a multinational brand, I would make the demo vendors run the same 50–100 commercial-intent prompts in, say, US English, UK English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, and Portuguese, and then demand a matrix of SoV × country × language × LLM × competitor. That test will reveal much more than a feature checklist.

If you mean AI share of voice (AI SOV) — i.e., “how often does my brand appear in ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity answers versus competitors, broken down by country, language, and market?” — the strongest tools today are:

My shortlist by use case

Global enterprise (50+ countries, many languages)

1. Profound — best if you need executive reporting, competitive intelligence, and large-scale tracking. indexly.ai
2. Evertune — best if AI SOV becomes a formal brand KPI. indexly.ai
3. Peec AI — best balance of multilingual coverage and usability. indexly.ai

B2B SaaS / technology companies

• Peec AI or Profound are usually the strongest fits because you can compare category prompts across markets (e.g., “best CRM in Germany” vs “best CRM in Japan”). indexly.ai

Consumer brands with localization needs

• Look for:
  • country-level prompt sets
  • native-language prompting (not just translated prompts)
  • local citation tracking
  • competitor sets that change by market

Agencies managing many clients

• Otterly AI and Peec AI tend to fit better because reporting workflows and multiple projects matter more than enterprise analytics depth. www.honeyb.aiverityscore.io

Features I would insist on before buying

For geographic/language AI SOV, avoid tools that only give one global score. You want:

• ✅ AI engine breakdown:
  • ChatGPT
  • Gemini
  • Perplexity
  • Claude
  • Google AI Overviews / AI Mode (where available)

• ✅ Market segmentation:
  • country
  • city/region (if relevant)
  • language
  • persona/audience

• ✅ Prompt-level reporting:
  • “Which prompts cause us to win/lose?”
  • “Which competitors replace us?”

• ✅ Citation intelligence:
  • which domains AI cites
  • why competitors appear

• ✅ Repeatable methodology:
  • multiple runs per prompt
  • sampling over time (AI answers vary) verityscore.io

If I were selecting a stack

• Enterprise multinational: Profound + Peec AI for complementary views
• Mid-market global brand: Peec AI
• SEO team expanding into AI search: Semrush AI Visibility
• Need a board-level AI brand metric: Profound or Evertune

One important caveat: AI SOV is still an emerging metric, and vendors calculate it differently (mentions vs citations vs ranking position vs sentiment weighting), so I would compare methodologies before comparing dashboards. www.honeyb.aiverityscore.io

If you tell me your industry (B2B SaaS, ecommerce, travel, finance, etc.), number of countries/languages, and whether you care about ChatGPT only vs all AI engines, I can narrow this to 2–3 options.

If your core requirement is AI share of voice by market × language × AI engine, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: Profound

For your specific use case, Profound is probably the strongest choice. Its tracking lets you assign prompts to countries, cities and languages, then calculate visibility, rank and share of voice at the prompt level. It also tracks multiple answer engines, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Copilot, Grok and others. www.tryprofound.com

That matters because I wouldn't treat "global AI visibility" as one metric. A useful dataset should look more like:

Brand × market × language × engine × topic × prompt

For example:

Germany × German × ChatGPT × "best CRM for Mittelstand"
Germany × English × ChatGPT × "best CRM for European companies"
France × French × Perplexity × "meilleur CRM..."
US × English × Google AI Overviews × "best CRM..."

Profound explicitly supports this kind of country/language segmentation, and its own research demonstrates why native-language tracking matters: its analysis of 3.25B citations found materially different citation patterns across languages and countries. www.tryprofound.comwww.tryprofound.com

Peec is the one I'd demo alongside it

Peec AI is particularly interesting if your primary KPI is competitive SOV by country rather than the broader enterprise analytics/workflow layer. Its tooling explicitly supports pulling brand visibility and share of voice broken down by country, including comparing the same metrics against competitors. peec.ai

I'd put it ahead of Otterly if you're building a serious international reporting system.

Otterly is the value option

Otterly is surprisingly strong for geographic analysis: it currently supports 65+ countries and simulates AI search from within each country, so you're measuring regional differences rather than simply translating one global result. help.otterly.ai

It's a good choice if you want:

• country-by-country monitoring
• competitor SOV
• citation tracking
• relatively straightforward reporting
• lower cost than enterprise platforms

Where Similarweb becomes interesting

If you're asking a broader question—"What's our AI SOV in each country, and how does that relate to our competitive position, traffic and market opportunity?"—I'd seriously evaluate Similarweb.

Its AI Share of Voice methodology distinguishes brand visibility from brand mention share, which is an important distinction: appearing in 20% of answers isn't the same as owning 20% of the competitive conversation. www.similarweb.com

Similarweb also exposes AI rankings by country + category + AI engine, making it particularly interesting for market-level competitive intelligence. www.tryprofound.compeec.aiaisearch.similarweb.com

My ranking for your use case

If you're a multinational brand:

1. Profound — best overall for market × language × engine analysis
2. Peec AI — best alternative if SOV/competitive analytics are the priority
3. Similarweb — best if you want AI visibility integrated with broader market/traffic intelligence
4. Otterly — best value and very good geographic coverage
5. Semrush — best if you're already deeply embedded in its SEO ecosystem

One important buying criterion: don't just ask vendors whether they "support multiple countries and languages." Ask them to demonstrate the same 50–100 prompts run in, say, US English, UK English, German Germany, French France, and Spanish Mexico, and show you SOV, competitor SOV, citations, sentiment, and engine-specific results side by side. Regional AI results can differ substantially, and simply translating an English prompt is not equivalent to running a native-language/local-market query. www.tryprofound.comwww.tryprofound.com

If you tell me how many countries/languages you need and whether this is for SEO, brand marketing, or competitive intelligence, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their actual pricing/coverage.

If your priority is comparing AI share of voice across countries and languages, I’d shortlist these:

My picks

1. LLM Pulse — best fit if "AI share of voice" is the core requirement.
It explicitly calculates SoV against competitors and lets you slice it by AI model, country, language, and prompt collection. It also position-weights mentions, so being recommended first matters more than merely appearing somewhere in the response. llmpulse.ai

2. Qwairy — best if you're managing lots of markets.
Its enterprise offering claims 100+ countries and 10+ languages, with regional/language-specific monitoring, multi-brand dashboards, BI integrations, and portfolio-level reporting. That's particularly interesting if you're comparing dozens of country-market combinations rather than just 5–10. www.qwairy.co

3. Writesonic — best if you want the analytics tied to optimization.
It tracks visibility, citations, sentiment and SoV across 10+ AI platforms and lets you filter by market, language, competitor, topic and intent. writesonic.com

4. KIME — worth considering for international brand teams.
It specifically supports tracking across markets, languages and AI models and provides visibility, mention rate, recommendation frequency, sentiment and SoV benchmarking. kime.ai

5. GrowByData — strongest if citation/source intelligence matters as much as SoV.
Its interesting differentiator is separating visibility from citation share, so you can see not just whether AI mentions you but which sources are actually contributing to that visibility. growbydata.com

One important caveat

Don't choose based on the number of "countries" or "languages" alone. For global AI visibility, I'd test whether the product actually executes localized prompts in the target locale, rather than merely translating an English prompt. AI answers can change substantially based on country, language, local search results and grounding sources.

For example, a useful benchmark would be:

Brand A vs B vs C → "best [category] for [use case]" → US/English vs Germany/German vs France/French vs Japan/Japanese → ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Perplexity → SoV + position + citations

That's much more meaningful than a single global AI visibility score.

If I were buying today:

• 5–20 markets: LLM Pulse
• 20–100+ markets / enterprise: Qwairy
• SEO/GEO team that also wants optimization workflows: Writesonic
• Heavy citation/market intelligence: GrowByData

If you tell me roughly how many countries/languages, number of brands, and whether you're B2B or consumer, I can narrow this to the 2–3 products I'd actually demo, including pricing and specific gaps in their geographic/language coverage.

If your core requirement is comparing AI share of voice across countries and languages, I’d shortlist these:

My picks

1. Semrush Enterprise AIO — best overall for a global enterprise

Semrush now explicitly supports location + language targeting, competitor comparisons, and AI SoV reporting across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity and Gemini. Its SoV metric incorporates both mentions and position in AI responses. www.semrush.com

Semrush AI Visibility / Enterprise AIO

2. Profound — best if AI search intelligence is the primary job

I'd look hardest at Profound if you're managing a large multinational brand and want granular competitive intelligence rather than simply an SEO add-on. Community comparisons consistently put Profound toward the enterprise end of the market, particularly for custom reporting and competitive analysis. www.reddit.comwww.reddit.com

3. Peec AI — best dedicated GEO platform

A strong choice if you don't need the enormous traditional-SEO ecosystem around Semrush. It's purpose-built around AI visibility, including share of voice, sentiment, mentions and citations across multiple AI engines. www.reddit.comwww.reddit.com

4. OptimizeGEO — particularly interesting for your specific use case

This is one I'd demo specifically because it advertises city-level geographic tracking and multilingual prompt coverage in one dashboard. That's closer to your question than tools that merely let you select a country. www.optimizegeo.ai

5. Omnia — good practical option for multinational monitoring

Omnia explicitly positions its monitoring around countries and languages, while tracking SoV, citations and competitors across major AI engines. www.useomnia.com

Omnia

One important caveat

For a multinational program, I would not treat "AI share of voice in France" as simply the French equivalent of your US SoV.

The underlying citation/source ecosystem can be dramatically different by market and language. A 2026 analysis covering 12 markets and 13 languages found substantial market-specific differences in the sites LLMs use as sources; another large-scale analysis found that AI-search source overlap between markets can be surprisingly low. arxiv.org

So I'd want the platform to let you compare at least:

Market × language × AI engine × prompt category × competitor × mention rate × position × citation share

rather than just giving you a single global "visibility score."

If I were buying today

• Global Fortune 500 / multinational: Profound or Semrush Enterprise AIO
• AI-search/GEO team: Peec AI
• Lots of countries + city-level localization: OptimizeGEO
• Lean marketing team: Omnia
• Want one platform alongside conventional SEO: Semrush

If you tell me how many countries/languages you need (e.g. 10 countries / 6 languages) and roughly how many brands/prompts, I can narrow this to the best 3 and compare their actual geo/language capabilities, engines, API/export, historical data, and likely pricing.

If your main requirement is AI share of voice (SOV) by geographic market and language, I’d narrow the field to Peec AI, Profound, and Writesonic, with Peec AI probably the best fit for a multinational marketing team.

My top 3

1. Peec AI — best overall for your use case

Peec AI

This is the one I'd demo first. Peec explicitly supports segmentation by model, country, and prompt tags, so you can construct something like:

US / English vs UK / English vs Germany / German vs France / French

…and compare brand visibility, competitors, citations, and trends. It also says it runs prompts daily, which is useful for longitudinal SOV rather than one-off snapshots. peec.aipeec.aiwritesonic.com

Its particularly attractive differentiator is that international/region tracking is built into the product rather than being an afterthought. peec.ai

2. Profound — best for a sophisticated enterprise program

Profound

I'd choose this if you need a more comprehensive enterprise-grade AI-search intelligence system: lots of markets, competitors, prompts, citation analysis, reporting and organizational workflows.

The tradeoff is complexity/cost. For simply answering "What's our AI SOV in Germany vs the US?", Peec may get you there faster.

3. Writesonic — worth testing if language/market segmentation is the #1 requirement

Writesonic AI Visibility Tracker

Writesonic is unusually explicit about allowing filtering by competitor, market, language and intent, while tracking visibility, citations, sentiment and SOV across 10+ AI platforms. writesonic.com

One important caveat

Don't buy based simply on the number of "countries" or "languages" a vendor claims to support.

For your use case, I'd test whether the platform actually executes localized prompts in the relevant market/language, rather than merely letting you tag a prompt as "Germany." You want to distinguish:

• 🇺🇸 US user asking in English
• 🇬🇧 UK user asking in English
• 🇩🇪 German user asking in German
• 🇩🇪 German user asking in English
• 🇫🇷 French user asking in French

Those can produce materially different AI recommendations and citations.

I'd also insist on being able to calculate SOV at multiple levels:

Brand SOV → category SOV → competitor SOV → country → language → AI engine → prompt/intent

That lets you answer questions like "We're #1 in US English but only #6 in German queries in Germany—why?" rather than getting one global "AI visibility score."

My recommendation

If I were evaluating these for a multinational brand, I'd run a 2-week bake-off of Peec vs Profound vs Writesonic using the exact same:

• 100–300 prompts
• 5–10 countries
• 3–5 languages
• 5–10 competitors
• 3–5 AI engines
• informational + commercial + comparison intent

Then compare SOV consistency, localization fidelity, citation accuracy, competitor detection, historical trending, and export/API quality.

If you tell me how many countries/languages you need and whether this is B2B, ecommerce, travel, finance, SaaS, etc., I can give you a much more specific shortlist—including which platform is strongest for 10+ markets and what the likely enterprise pricing looks like.

If your priority is comparing AI share of voice across countries and languages, I’d shortlist these:

1. Profound — my #1 for global programs

Profound is probably the strongest fit if you're trying to answer questions like:

“What's our AI share of voice in Germany vs. France vs. Japan, and how does that change when the query is in German, French, or Japanese?”

It explicitly supports share of voice, regional comparisons, model-level analysis, topics and prompts. Its reporting can break visibility down by region, and its current platform covers a broad set of answer engines. help.tryprofound.com

Its API also exposes share_of_voice, visibility, mentions, average position, etc., which is useful if you want to put global AI-SOV into your own BI/reporting stack. docs.tryprofound.com

I'd choose Profound if: you're an enterprise/multinational and AI visibility is becoming a serious market-intelligence KPI.

2. Semrush AI Visibility — best for SEO + AI together

Semrush has become unusually strong here. Its AI Visibility Toolkit lets you specify location and language, then compare AI share of voice against competitors. Brand Performance supports 68,000+ location-language combinations, including country, region, city and global configurations. www.semrush.com

It also covers ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity and Gemini, with competitor and sentiment analysis. www.semrush.com

The big advantage is that you can connect AI visibility with traditional SEO data, keywords, backlinks, content and competitor research.

I'd choose Semrush if: your team already has a substantial SEO operation and wants AI SOV incorporated into the existing workflow.

3. Peec AI — best dedicated AI-SOV analytics

Peec is particularly attractive if you don't need the enormous SEO suite around the AI data.

Its definition of SOV is straightforward: your brand's mentions divided by total tracked brand mentions. docs.peec.ai

More importantly for your use case, Peec explicitly supports country-level competitive gaps—e.g., identifying countries where your visibility trails a competitor and calculating the SOV gap. peec.ai

Peec is also doing interesting research on multilingual AI search. For example, its analysis of 10M+ ChatGPT searches found substantial English-language retrieval even when users ask questions in other languages. peec.ai

I'd choose Peec if: the core requirement is a clean AI visibility / SOV intelligence layer, rather than a broad SEO platform.

The important distinction: country ≠ language

For your use case, I wouldn't buy based simply on “number of countries supported.”

You ideally want to be able to construct a matrix like:

That's important because English-only measurement can materially misrepresent local-market AI visibility. Recent research across 12 European languages found that query language can substantially change which brands are recommended, particularly benefiting local brands when users query in their home language. arxiv.org

My recommendation

If I were evaluating these for a multinational brand, I'd run a bake-off between:

Profound vs. Semrush vs. Peec

And I'd give each the same:

• 10–20 countries
• 3–5 languages
• 50–200 prompts per market
• 5–10 competitors
• ChatGPT + Gemini + Perplexity + Google AI
• branded and non-branded prompts
• weekly/monthly SOV tracking

Then compare not just the dashboards, but whether the underlying prompt/response data is actually comparable across languages and geographies.

For a pure global AI-share-of-voice use case, my ranking is: Profound > Peec > Semrush. For a combined SEO + AI program, I'd flip that to Semrush > Profound > Peec.

If your specific need is AI share of voice (SOV) by country/market and language, I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation

1. Scrunch AI — probably the best fit for your exact requirement.

Scrunch lets you segment AI share of voice by country, AI platform, topic, persona, funnel stage, branded/non-branded prompts, and other dimensions. It also lets you drill down to individual prompts and citations rather than just giving you a single global visibility score. scrunch.com

That makes it particularly attractive if you're trying to answer questions like:

“Our brand has 22% AI SOV in Germany, but only 9% in France—and is the difference caused by language, competitors, or the sources LLMs are using?”

2. Profound — best if this is a serious global enterprise measurement program.

I'd favor Profound if you need a more sophisticated enterprise setup spanning many markets, models, competitors and prompts. Independent 2026 comparisons generally put it toward the enterprise end of the category. nboundmarketing.com

3. Peec AI — best pure SOV/competitive-intelligence choice.

Peec explicitly measures visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice, including competitor comparison, and lets you select the AI models you want to monitor. peec.ai

One important caveat about “language”

Don't assume that a tool supporting multiple languages means it can answer the market × language question properly.

This is actually a meaningful methodological issue: recent research across 12 European languages found that changing the query language can substantially change which brands are recommended, with English-only monitoring potentially understating local brands' AI visibility. arxiv.org

For a global program, I'd therefore insist that the platform can distinguish at least:

Country → language → prompt/topic → AI engine/model → brand SOV → competitor SOV → citations

rather than simply translating English prompts into other languages.

If I were buying today

I'd run a bake-off between Scrunch, Profound and Peec using the same 100–300 prompts in, say, US English, UK English, German, French, Spanish and Japanese, across your major target markets.

The winner shouldn't necessarily be the one reporting the highest SOV. I'd judge them on:

1. True geographic localization — does “France” actually mean a French-market AI result?
2. Native-language prompts rather than machine-translated prompts.
3. Repeatability — how much does SOV fluctuate between runs?
4. Model coverage — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, etc.
5. Competitor SOV at market/language level.
6. Citation/source SOV — why is the competitor winning?
7. Raw response access — can you inspect the actual AI answers behind the metric?
8. API/export — essential if you're building a global reporting layer.

That last point matters because AI visibility is still relatively immature: different platforms can produce materially different SOV figures depending on how they sample prompts, deduplicate responses, and define a “mention.” llmvisibility.tech

Bottom line: Scrunch is my first choice for geo × language × SOV, Profound for a large enterprise/global intelligence program, and Peec if your primary requirement is straightforward competitive AI SOV.

If you tell me how many countries/languages, which AI engines, and roughly how many brands/competitors you're tracking, I can give you a much more specific 2026 shortlist—including pricing, API access, geographic granularity, and which one I'd buy.

If your specific requirement is AI share of voice by country × language × competitor × AI engine, I’d shortlist these:

1. Semrush — my first choice

For a multinational brand, Semrush is probably the easiest place to start. Its Brand Performance reports let you specify a location and language, then compare AI share of voice, sentiment and competitors. Semrush says it supports 68,000+ location-language combinations, including countries, regions and cities. www.semrush.com

It also lets you break performance down by AI platform, including ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity and Gemini. www.semrush.com

Why I'd pick it: you can get something like:

Germany / German / SaaS category → Brand A 31% SoV vs Brand B 24% vs Brand C 18%

and compare that with:

France / French → Brand A 17% vs Brand B 29%...

That's much closer to the market-by-market competitive intelligence use case you're describing.

2. Scrunch — potentially better for a serious global program

Scrunch is particularly interesting if you want to build a matrix of country × language × persona × prompt × model. It supports prompts in any language and country-level geolocation through personas. helpcenter.scrunchai.com

Its SoV reporting can be filtered by AI platform, topic, persona, funnel stage, country, etc. scrunch.com

A particularly useful feature is that one prompt template can be deployed across multiple countries, languages, personas and AI platforms. scrunch.com

I'd choose Scrunch over Semrush if your core problem is managing a large international AI-search measurement program rather than integrating AI visibility into an existing SEO stack.

3. Peec AI — excellent if SoV is the central KPI

Peec is purpose-built around AI visibility. It explicitly measures visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice against competitors. peec.ai

I'd put it high on the list if your dashboard needs to answer:

• What % of AI answers mention us?
• How does that compare with competitors?
• Which prompts drive our SoV?
• Which LLMs are we winning/losing?
• Is our position improving over time?

It's less of an all-in-one SEO platform and more focused on the AI visibility analytics problem.

4. OtterlyAI — strong value for multinational monitoring

Otterly is surprisingly good for this particular requirement. It currently supports 65+ countries, and its monitoring accepts prompts in any language, preserving the language you actually entered and querying the AI engine in the selected country context. help.otterly.ai

That's important because English-only measurement can materially misrepresent local AI visibility. Recent research found that changing the query language can substantially change which brands are recommended, particularly for local brands. arxiv.org

My ranking for your use case

If you're evaluating software specifically for global AI Share of Voice, I'd rank them:

1. Semrush — best combination of geographic/language coverage + SoV + competitive analysis
2. Scrunch — best for sophisticated country/language/persona segmentation
3. Peec AI — best dedicated AI SoV analytics experience
4. OtterlyAI — best if you want broad international coverage without going straight to enterprise tooling

One important caveat: don't compare vendors' SoV percentages as if they're interchangeable. They use different prompt sets, sampling methodologies, model environments and weighting. Treat each platform's SoV primarily as a within-platform trend/benchmark.

If you're buying for a global enterprise, I'd actually run a bake-off between Semrush vs. Scrunch vs. Peec using the same ~50 prompts across, say, US/English, UK/English, Germany/German, France/French, Japan/Japanese and Brazil/Portuguese. That will reveal much more than feature/pricing comparisons.

If you mean AI Share of Voice (AI SOV) — measuring how often a brand appears in AI-generated answers versus competitors across countries, regions, and languages — the best tools are still a developing category (often called GEO / AEO / AI visibility platforms). For a global program, I’d prioritize: location simulation, language support, competitor benchmarking, citation tracking, prompt-level data, and repeatable measurement cadence. arxiv.org

Here are the strongest options:

My shortlist by use case

Global enterprise (50+ markets, many languages)

1. Profound
2. Semrush
3. OptimizeGEO

SEO/content team adding AI visibility

1. Semrush
2. Peec AI

Agency managing multiple brands

1. Peec AI
2. Otterly.AI

Features I would require before buying

For a true geographic/language comparison, make sure the tool can:

• Run the same prompt set by country + language
  • e.g., “best CRM for startups” in English US vs German Germany vs Japanese Japan
• Separate:
  • brand mentions
  • competitor mentions
  • citation sources
  • position/order in answer
  • sentiment
• Track multiple AI engines:
  • ChatGPT
  • Google AI features
  • Gemini
  • Perplexity
  • Claude
• Export data for BI tools
• Repeat measurements over time (AI answers fluctuate, so one-off checks are unreliable). arxiv.org

If your goal is a multinational brand dashboard (e.g., compare AI SOV in US vs UK vs Germany vs Japan), I would lean toward Profound or Semrush for enterprise reporting, with OptimizeGEO worth evaluating if localization depth is the main requirement. www.reddit.comwww.optimizegeo.ai

If you're looking to measure AI Share of Voice (AI SoV)—that is, how often your brand is mentioned or recommended by AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.) across different countries and languages—the market is still evolving. A handful of platforms have emerged as leaders.

Here's how I'd compare them:

Top recommendations

1. Profound

Best for large brands wanting the deepest AI visibility data.

Strengths:

• Tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and other AI systems
• Country-specific prompts
• Localized prompt libraries
• Brand share of voice
• Competitor benchmarking
• Citation/source analysis
• Executive dashboards

This is currently one of the strongest products if AI SoV is your primary KPI.

2. Peec AI

Probably the strongest choice for multilingual companies.

Strengths:

• Compare visibility across countries
• Native multilingual prompt tracking
• AI search rankings
• Brand mentions
• Competitive benchmarking
• Market-by-market reporting

If you're comparing, for example:

• US vs Germany
• France vs Spain
• English vs Japanese

Peec AI is particularly well suited.

3. Goodie

Good balance between usability and depth.

Highlights:

• AI visibility monitoring
• Prompt management
• Competitor tracking
• Geographic segmentation
• Marketing-friendly dashboards

4. Scrunch AI

More focused on AI optimization than pure monitoring.

Useful for:

• discovering why competitors appear more often
• monitoring recommendation quality
• testing prompts
• improving AI discoverability

Traditional SEO suites

Both Semrush and Ahrefs have begun adding AI search and AI overview capabilities. They're useful if AI visibility is only one part of your broader SEO program, but they generally aren't as specialized for AI SoV as the dedicated platforms above.

Features that matter for geographic AI SoV

For international brands, prioritize platforms that support:

• Country-specific prompt testing
• Native-language prompts (not just translation)
• Multiple AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.)
• Local competitors by market
• Citation and source analysis
• Trend tracking over time
• Custom prompt libraries
• API access for BI dashboards
• Scheduled monitoring

If you operate in 20+ countries

A common enterprise setup is:

• Profound for executive AI Share of Voice reporting
• Peec AI for multilingual and country-level tracking
• Semrush or Ahrefs for traditional SEO alongside AI visibility

That combination gives both AI-specific insights and conventional search performance.

If you can share:

• how many countries you operate in,
• which AI platforms you care about (ChatGPT only, or also Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.), and
• whether you're B2B or B2C,

I can recommend the best fit based on your scale and budget.

If your goal is comparing AI share of voice (SoV) across countries and languages, you're looking for a newer category often called AI visibility, LLM visibility, or Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platforms. The biggest differentiator isn't whether they measure SoV—many do—but whether they support localized prompts, multiple languages, and country-specific testing.

Here's how I'd rank them:

Best overall: Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Semrush has become one of the strongest options because it combines:

• AI share of voice
• Country-level reporting
• Competitor comparisons
• Prompt tracking
• Traditional SEO metrics
• Historical trends

It also lets you break down visibility by geography, which is essential for comparing markets like Germany vs. Japan vs. Brazil rather than treating AI visibility as a single global number. www.semrush.com

Best for multinational brands: Profound

Profound is probably the most mature enterprise AI visibility platform.

It focuses on:

• ChatGPT
• Gemini
• Claude
• Perplexity
• Google AI
• localized prompts
• citation analysis
• competitor benchmarking

It's commonly used by Fortune 500 marketing teams because it emphasizes governance, reporting, and market segmentation rather than just rankings. www.reddit.com

Best for international GEO teams: Otterly AI

Otterly AI has been one of the earlier platforms supporting country-specific monitoring.

Good capabilities include:

• country-specific prompt execution
• competitor tracking
• AI citation monitoring
• recurring reports

Many agencies use it for international clients because it supports repeated monitoring across markets. neuraladx.com

Best if language differences matter

If you're studying AI behavior across languages (for example, asking the same question in English, Spanish, French, Japanese, and Arabic), look for tools that let you specify:

• query language
• execution location
• AI model
• competitor set

Research published in 2026 found that LLM recommendations can change substantially depending on the query language, especially for regional brands. English-only monitoring can significantly understate visibility in local markets. arxiv.org

Important capabilities to require

For a global AI SoV program, I'd insist on:

• Native multilingual prompt libraries
• Country-specific execution
• Separate reporting by language and market
• ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI support
• Citation/source tracking
• Competitor benchmarking
• Historical trend analysis
• API access
• Export to BI tools (Looker, Power BI, Tableau)

If you're evaluating vendors

Ask these questions:

• Can I run the same prompt in 20 countries?
• Can I compare English vs. local-language prompts?
• How many LLMs are tracked?
• Are prompts executed from the target country or merely translated?
• Is SoV weighted by mention position or simple mention count?
• How often are prompts rerun?
• Can I upload my own prompt library?
• Is the data accessible via API?

Recommendations by organization size

• Enterprise (global brands): Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Profound, Adobe LLM Optimizer
• Mid-market: Otterly AI, Peec AI
• Agencies: Otterly AI, Peec AI, Semrush
• Research/benchmarking: Semrush plus a custom prompt framework to normalize results across countries

One caveat: there is no industry-standard definition of "AI share of voice." Some tools count any brand mention, others weight the order of mentions, and others factor in citations or prominence. If you're comparing vendors, verify exactly how each calculates SoV before using the metric for cross-platform or year-over-year comparisons. llmpulse.ai

If your priority is comparing AI share of voice across countries, regions, and languages, you're looking for the new category of AI Visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platforms, not traditional SEO tools.

Here's how I'd rank the current options:

1. Genoma — strongest overall for geographic AI visibility

Genoma is one of the few platforms built specifically around country- and language-specific AI behavior.

It lets you:

• compare ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini
• run prompts in different countries
• compare English vs. Spanish vs. French (etc.)
• measure AI Share of Voice by market
• see which URLs AI is citing
• compare competitors by geography rather than just globally. www.genomahq.com

This is probably the closest match to your question.

2. ORIA — best enterprise workflow

ORIA emphasizes:

• market-specific prompts
• language filtering
• AI answer monitoring
• competitor benchmarking
• executive dashboards
• prompt intelligence segmented by geography and intent. oria.global

If you have regional marketing teams, this is a strong choice.

3. OptimizeGEO — strongest geographic analytics

Their standout capabilities include:

• city-level tracking
• multi-region monitoring
• multilingual prompts
• normalized AI visibility scoring
• tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI, and Perplexity. www.optimizegeo.ai

If your company operates across North America, Europe, APAC, and LATAM simultaneously, this is one of the most comprehensive offerings.

4. GeoHub

GeoHub focuses heavily on:

• countries
• personas
• languages
• citation quality
• domain-level AI visibility

One nice feature is showing why AI produced different answers in Thailand versus Singapore versus Germany. www.geohub.app

5. Zumi

Zumi is particularly good for daily competitive tracking:

• mention rate
• share of voice
• average answer position
• engine-by-engine comparisons
• competitor dashboards. www.zumihq.com

If you're a large enterprise

Also consider:

• Profound
• AthenaHQ
• Peec AI

These are widely discussed as enterprise AI visibility platforms with strong competitive intelligence capabilities, although publicly available information on multilingual geographic comparison is less detailed than for the tools above. www.reddit.com

Features to insist on

For international AI share-of-voice measurement, I'd expect a platform to support:

• Country-level prompt execution (e.g., US vs. UK vs. Germany vs. Japan)
• Native-language prompts rather than machine-translated ones
• Multiple AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Mode/Overviews, Copilot, Grok)
• AI Share of Voice by competitor
• Citation/source tracking
• Trend analysis over time
• Custom prompt libraries by market
• API access for exporting data to BI tools

One important caveat

Comparing markets isn't as simple as translating prompts. Recent research shows that query language alone can significantly change which brands AI recommends, meaning an English-only audit can substantially underestimate the visibility of local brands in their home markets. For global brands, you should measure using native-language prompts in each target market, not just English translated across regions. arxiv.org

For a multinational company tracking AI visibility in 20+ countries, my shortlist would be:

1. urlOptimizeGEOturn0search2 (most comprehensive geographic capabilities)
2. urlGenomaturn0search0 (excellent market and language segmentation)
3. urlORIAturn0search1 (best enterprise reporting)
4. Profound (enterprise competitive intelligence)
5. Peec AI (strong monitoring with a growing feature set)

If your priority is comparing AI share of voice (SoV) across countries, languages, and competitors, the market is still maturing. Most tools do one of three things:

1. Enterprise AI visibility monitoring (best for global brands)
2. SEO platforms adding AI visibility
3. Specialized AI SoV startups

Here's how I'd rank them.

1. Profound (Best overall for multinational brands)

Strengths:

• Country-specific prompt testing
• Native-language prompt libraries
• Competitive AI share of voice
• Citation tracking
• Trend analysis over time
• Enterprise dashboards

If you're monitoring:

• US vs Germany
• Japan vs Korea
• English vs Spanish vs French

this is probably the strongest dedicated platform today. Industry analysts and practitioners consistently place it among the leaders for enterprise AI visibility. www.ai-visibility-software.comwww.reddit.com

2. Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

If your organization already uses Semrush for SEO, this is often the easiest addition.

Advantages:

• AI SoV alongside traditional search
• Country databases
• Competitive comparisons
• AI Overview tracking
• Existing keyword and SEO data integration

It won't always have the deepest LLM-specific analytics, but it excels at connecting AI visibility with organic search performance. www.semrush.com

3. LLM Pulse

One of the stronger products specifically for:

• filtering by country
• filtering by language
• comparing AI models
• measuring SoV over time

It lets you segment by:

• locale
• prompt collection
• model
• date

which is valuable for international brands. llmpulse.ai

4. Otterly AI

Popular with agencies because it supports:

• multiple countries
• recurring prompt runs
• competitor monitoring
• historical reporting

Its international coverage is one of its stronger differentiators. www.ai-visibility-software.comwww.reddit.com

5. Peec AI

Especially good for European companies.

Good at:

• multilingual monitoring
• citation analysis
• competitive AI visibility
• recurring benchmark reports

Often chosen by marketing teams operating across several European markets. www.ai-visibility-software.comwww.reddit.com

6. AISoV (Braign)

A more focused AI share-of-voice platform.

It compares:

• ChatGPT
• Claude
• Gemini

using the same prompt set while measuring:

• brand mentions
• competitors
• citations
• share of voice

Simple and purpose-built rather than an all-in-one SEO suite. sov.braign.io

What matters for multilingual AI SoV

If you're evaluating vendors, I'd specifically ask whether they support:

• Native-language prompts (not just machine-translated English prompts)
• Country-specific execution (e.g., French users in France vs. French users in Canada)
• Separate reporting by language and geography
• Multiple repeated runs per prompt (AI outputs vary between runs)
• Citation/source tracking
• Competitor benchmarking
• Historical trend analysis

Research has shown that AI recommendations can differ substantially depending on the query language and local market. English-only monitoring can underestimate the visibility of local brands in their home languages. arxiv.org

Recommendations by organization size

• Global enterprise (20+ countries): Profound
• Enterprise already using SEO platforms: Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
• Mid-market SaaS or B2B: LLM Pulse
• Agency managing international clients: Otterly AI
• European multilingual brands: Peec AI
• Cost-conscious teams wanting focused AI SoV: AISoV (Braign)