ChatGPT answers, unedited

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain gets cited by AI assistants over time,” I’d look first at otterly.ai.

Why it fits particularly well:

• Domain citation tracking: it records which URLs/domains AI systems cite and how frequently. Otterly Otterly
• Historical trends: its Domain Coverage Over Time chart shows your domain's citation rate across a selected period, so you can see increases, declines, and changes after content work. Otterly AI
• Per-engine tracking: it monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, allowing you to break down visibility by engine. Otterly
• Prompt-level history: you can see which prompts generated citations and how citation performance changes over time. Otterly AI
• URL-level history: individual cited URLs have citation trends, including which prompts and engines cited them. Otterly
• Export/API options: citation data can be exported to CSV, and higher-tier integrations include Looker Studio and API/MCP access. Otterly AI

Alternatives worth considering

tryprofound.com is another strong option if you're operating at a larger enterprise/AEO level. It focuses heavily on citation share, competitor sources, prompts, and answer-engine analysis. Profound

rankscale.ai is worth looking at if you want broader engine coverage and citation-pattern analysis; it reports citation volume, domain share and trends across 17+ engines. Rankscale.ai

My practical shortlist:

• Most directly aligned with your requirement: OtterlyAI
• Enterprise/AEO intelligence: Profound
• Broad engine/citation analysis: Rankscale

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure whether AI answers cite your domain, not merely whether AI crawlers visited your site. OtterlyAI explicitly separates those concepts with its Agent Analytics feature. Otterly AI

If you tell me your domain + approximate monthly budget, I can compare the current plans/features of 3–5 platforms specifically for historical AI citation tracking.

If you want to track how often your domain is cited by AI assistants over time (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.), you’re looking for an AI citation tracking / Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platform rather than a traditional SEO tool.

Here are the strongest options I’d evaluate:

My shortlist by use case

• You run SEO/content for a company and need “are we gaining AI citations month over month?”

• Start with Indexly. It appears closest to a classic SEO rank tracker but for AI citations: citation share, cited URLs, daily trends, and competitor citation gaps. Indexly
• You want competitive intelligence (“who does AI cite instead of us?”)

• Look at Rankscale or Indexly. Rankscale emphasizes domain/category citation patterns and competitor comparisons. Rankscale
• You’re an agency managing multiple brands

• Evaluate Profound and Indexly; they are oriented toward broader AI visibility reporting. Tinuiti Indexly

Metrics I’d make sure the platform provides

Don’t just track “AI mentions.” The useful metrics are:

• Citation share: % of relevant AI answers that cite your domain
• Citation trend: weekly/monthly change
• Cited URLs: which pages on your site are being referenced
• Engine breakdown: ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Perplexity vs Claude
• Citation gaps: queries where competitors are cited and you are not
• Prompt-level history: the exact questions where your site gained/lost visibility

One caveat: AI citation tracking is still a developing measurement category. Different tools sample prompts and AI outputs differently, so the absolute numbers are less important than tracking consistent trends over time with a stable prompt set. BrandGhost Sorank Data

If you tell me your domain size (startup site vs enterprise), industry, and whether you care more about ChatGPT citations specifically or all AI engines, I can narrow this to 1–2 platforms.

If your goal is specifically “how often is my domain being cited by AI assistants, and how has that changed over time?”, I’d look first at peec.ai.

Why it fits:

• Tracks source citations separately from brand mentions—so your domain can be measured even when the AI doesn't explicitly name your brand. Peec AI
• Shows citation/source data at both the domain and URL level, including citation frequency. Peec AI
• Tracks multiple AI surfaces, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and Copilot. Peec AI Peec AI
• Data is refreshed daily, which makes it useful for building historical trend lines. Peec AI
• You can segment results by model, country, and prompt, and export/use the data through Looker Studio, API, or CSV. Peec AI Peec AI

Another strong option: Profound

tryprofound.com is particularly interesting if you want deep citation analytics. Its Citations section provides citation share and citation coverage as time-series charts, lets you compare domains, and break results down by platform, topic, region, and other dimensions. Profound Help Center

Profound also explicitly tracks which answer engines cite your content, across the prompts you're monitoring, and categorizes sources such as owned content, competitors, earned media, and social sources. Profound

My practical distinction:

• Peec AI → better fit if you want a straightforward ongoing AI visibility + domain citation dashboard across many assistants.
• Profound → worth considering if your primary job is AEO/GEO research and detailed citation intelligence.

If you tell me your domain and which assistants matter most (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI, Claude, etc.), I can also compare the relevant platforms on historical depth, citation-level tracking, pricing, and API/export capabilities.

If your goal is specifically “How often is my domain being cited by AI assistants, and how has that changed over time?”, I’d recommend Peec AI.

peec.ai is particularly well suited because it tracks source citations separately from brand mentions. You can see which URLs/domains are being used or explicitly cited, citation frequency, the AI engines involved, and trends over time. It covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, and others. Peec AI Peec AI

My shortlist

• 🥇 Peec AI — Best fit for your exact requirement. It distinguishes domain/source visibility from brand visibility, tracks citations at the URL and domain level, and provides historical/trend data. Peec AI Peec AI
• 🥈 OtterlyAI — Very good alternative if you want detailed citation analytics. It stores AI responses and tracks every cited URL, alongside mentions, rank, sentiment and share of voice across seven AI search engines. Otterly
• 🥉 Profound — Worth considering for a larger enterprise GEO/AI-search program, particularly if you want broader enterprise analytics rather than primarily a citation-monitoring workflow.

For your use case, I'd start with Peec. The important distinction is that you don't merely want to know “Does ChatGPT mention my company?” You want “Is example.com being used as a source, which pages are cited, by which models, and is that citation footprint growing or shrinking?” Peec explicitly supports that distinction. Peec AI

If you tell me your domain + whether you're primarily interested in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, or all of them, I can also compare Peec vs Otterly vs Profound on historical data retention, URL-level citation tracking, API access, and pricing.

I’d recommend tryprofound.com if your primary goal is historical tracking of how often your domain is cited by AI assistants.

• Tracks citations across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and others.
• Shows citation share over time, including day-to-day trends.
• Lets you drill down to the specific URLs being cited.
• Compares your citation share against competitors.
• Runs tracked prompts daily, giving you a longitudinal dataset rather than a one-time snapshot. Profound Profound Help Center Profound

Good alternative: peec.ai, particularly if you want a more self-serve product. It tracks both brand mentions and source citations, including citation frequency at the domain/URL level. peec.ai peec.ai

If you're specifically interested in “how has my domain's citation rate changed month-over-month?”, I'd pick Profound.

If your main goal is “How often is my domain being cited by AI assistants, and is that changing over time?”, my top recommendation is otterly.ai.

Why OtterlyAI fits

• Tracks domain and URL citations over time, rather than only tracking whether your brand is mentioned.
• Monitors major AI search/answer engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude. Otterly Otterly
• Its Domain Coverage Over Time metric shows the percentage of tracked AI responses that cite your domain, so you can see whether visibility is increasing or declining. Otterly AI
• You can drill down to individual URLs, see citation counts/trends, and identify the prompts and engines responsible for those citations. Otterly Otterly AI
• You can compare your domain against competitors and segment by engine, country, prompt, and date range. Otterly AI Otterly AI
• It also has an Agent Analytics feature that connects citation trends with actual AI crawler/agent visits to your site, which is useful for understanding why citation visibility changes. Otterly AI

A strong alternative: Profound

tryprofound.com is probably the better choice if you're doing enterprise-level AI visibility research. Its citation analytics show citation share by platform/topic/prompt and let you track individual pages' citation volume over time. Profound

One particularly interesting difference is that Profound also has historical prompt-volume data going back to January 2025 for the US, including ChatGPT, which can give you a broader view of how AI-search demand itself is changing. Profound Help Center

My pick: Start with OtterlyAI if you specifically want a straightforward historical dashboard for “my domain → AI citations over time.” Choose Profound if you also want deeper enterprise research into the prompts and market trends driving those citations.

For tracking historical trends of your domain being cited by AI assistants, these are the strongest options:

• tryprofound.com — Best for enterprise AI visibility tracking. It tracks citations across assistants like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and AI Overviews, with competitive share-of-voice and trend reporting. Tinuiti
• amicited.com — Good for source-level citation history. Its “citations over time” views show daily citation volume by AI provider, domain, and URL. Am I Cited
• rankscale.ai — Useful if you want dashboards showing cited domains, URLs, categories, and brand citation share over time across multiple AI engines. Rankscale.ai
• cite.watch — More lightweight; tracks AI mentions, citation rate, visibility score, and trends across assistants. Cite Watch
• bing.com — Free option if Microsoft Copilot/Bing AI coverage is enough. Its AI Performance report shows cited pages, grounding queries, and citation trends over time. Search - Microsoft Bing

My pick:

• Enterprise SEO/GEO team: Profound
• Content team needing actionable URL-level insights: AmICited or Rankscale
• Free starting point: Bing Webmaster Tools

A key caveat: most platforms measure citations from a tracked set of prompts, not every possible AI conversation, so the historical trend is usually “citation visibility for monitored queries,” not a complete census of all AI usage. Search - Microsoft Bing Am I Cited

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants over time”, I’d shortlist these:

Best overall: tryprofound.com

Profound is probably the strongest fit if citation tracking is the priority. It tracks which answer engines cite your domain, how often, which specific URLs are cited, and lets you analyze citation share by platform, topic, and prompt. It also has “watched pages” so you can see how citation volume changes for individual pages over time. Profound Profound

Why I'd pick it: it's focused on the distinction between brand mentions and actual source citations, which sounds exactly like what you're asking for.

Best simpler alternative: peec.ai

Peec tracks both brand visibility and source citations across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and other AI search surfaces. Its data is refreshed daily, and you can view citation/source usage at both the domain and individual URL level, making it useful for historical trend charts. Peec AI Peec AI

A particularly useful distinction is that Peec tracks whether your content was “used” by an AI system versus explicitly “cited” as a source. Peec AI

If historical trends are the #1 requirement: Presenc AI

presenc.ai explicitly emphasizes historical AI-visibility trends, including daily/weekly/monthly mention-frequency trends across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini. Presenc AI

My recommendation

I'd start with Profound if you're doing serious SEO/GEO measurement. If you want something that is easier to get running and gives you both visibility + citation data, Peec AI is probably the better first trial.

One important caveat: these platforms generally measure citations by repeatedly testing a defined set of prompts. That's different from having a complete historical record of every AI response involving your domain. Profound's broader index is an interesting exception because it also reports citation share at industry/category scale. Profound

If you tell me your domain + whether you care about ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, or all of them, I can recommend the best tool and explain exactly what historical data you'll be able to see.

If your main requirement is historical tracking of how often your own domain is actually cited by AI assistants, I’d recommend scrunch.com.

Why Scrunch fits particularly well

• Tracks actual citations, not just brand mentions. It records the URLs that AI platforms cite in responses, including your own domain, competitors, and third-party sources. AI Customer Experience Platform Scrunch Help Center
• Historical trends: you can view citation frequency over time, including week-over-week changes and custom date ranges. The platform currently provides up to one year of historical data. Scrunch Scrunch Help Center
• Domain → URL granularity: you can see not only that yourdomain.com was cited, but which specific pages were cited and which prompts generated those citations. Scrunch Help Center
• AI-platform breakdown: useful for determining whether your domain is gaining citations in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, etc. Scrunch Help Center
• Competitive benchmarking: you can compare your citation presence against competing domains and identify sources that are getting cited instead of you. AI Customer Experience Platform
• It also distinguishes brand presence from actual domain citation—an important distinction if your goal is measuring whether AI systems consider your site a source of information. Scrunch Help Center

Two alternatives worth considering

Profound is probably my second choice if you want a broader enterprise-grade AI-search analytics platform. Its citation tooling tracks which answer engines cite you, how often, the prompts involved, and categorizes sources into owned, competitor, earned media, social, etc. Profound

Peec AI is another strong option if your focus is more on AI visibility/share of voice than purely citation history. It tracks visibility, position, sentiment, share of voice, and the sources influencing AI responses across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and other engines. Peec AI

My ranking for your specific use case:

1. Scrunch — best match for “How has my domain's AI citation rate changed over time?”
2. Profound — best if you also want deeper enterprise research and competitive intelligence.
3. Peec AI — best if brand visibility/share of voice is more important than raw URL citation history.

One caveat: these platforms generally measure citations from a defined/tracked prompt set, rather than magically observing every AI conversation in existence. So when evaluating them, I'd specifically ask: “Can I export historical citation data by domain, URL, prompt, model, and date?” That's the dataset you want if you're building a genuine AI-citation trend line.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain gets cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time,” I’d recommend otterly.ai.

Why it fits particularly well:

• Domain-level citation tracking: it tracks the specific URLs/domains cited in AI answers, not just whether your brand was mentioned. Otterly Otterly
• Historical trends: its citation-detail views show whether a URL is gaining or losing citations over time, including the prompts and AI engines responsible. Otterly
• Multiple AI assistants: it currently monitors ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Claude. Otterly
• Daily monitoring: prompts are rerun daily, allowing you to build a meaningful time series rather than taking occasional snapshots. Otterly AI
• Competitor comparison: you can see when competitors' domains are cited instead of yours and track citation/share-of-voice trends. Otterly
• Reasonable entry price: Otterly advertises plans starting at $29/month, with a free trial. Otterly

My shortlist

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure citations in generated answers to a defined set of prompts. They aren't a literal historical database of every AI assistant response ever generated. So I'd choose based on whether you want a controlled, repeatable prompt panel whose citation rate you can trend over months.

For your specific wording, I'd start with OtterlyAI. Its “Domain Citation Tracking” is almost exactly the feature you're describing. Otterly

If you tell me your domain and whether you're B2B, ecommerce, SaaS, publisher, etc., I can also compare Otterly vs Profound vs Peec specifically for your use case and current pricing/features.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain is cited by AI assistants, and how that has changed over time,” I’d recommend Ahrefs Brand Radar.

ahrefs.com

Why I’d pick it

• Historical data: Brand Radar can access historical AI responses going back to 2025, so you can analyze trends rather than starting a new tracking baseline today. Ahrefs Help Center Ahrefs
• Actual citations, not just mentions: It distinguishes between an AI assistant mentioning your brand and linking to your domain/page as a source. Ahrefs Ahrefs
• Multiple AI platforms: It covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. Ahrefs Help Center
• Domain/page-level analysis: You can see which domains and individual pages are being cited, which is particularly useful for figuring out what content is earning AI citations. Ahrefs Help Center
• Competitive benchmarking: You can compare your AI visibility/share of voice against competitors rather than looking at your domain in isolation. Ahrefs
• Custom tracking: You can specify your own important prompts and monitor them daily, weekly, or monthly. Ahrefs Help Center

One important caveat: this is sampled AI visibility, not a log of every time an AI assistant has ever cited your domain. Ahrefs explicitly describes its methodology as a structured sample of AI-generated responses rather than access to private conversations or all AI usage. Ahrefs

Other options worth considering

• Citations.io — more narrowly focused on AI citations and tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude. citations.io Citations.io
• AI Visibility — simpler if you mainly want recurring measurements of whether your domain is cited/recommended across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, with month-by-month trends. ai-visibility.io AI Visibility
• Kitbase — another lightweight option that reports domain citation/presence rates over time from prompts you choose. kitbase.dev Kitbase

My ranking for your specific use case: Ahrefs Brand Radar > Citations.io > AI Visibility/Kitbase.

If you're specifically trying to answer “Is my website getting cited by ChatGPT more or less than it was 3/6/12 months ago?”, Ahrefs is the strongest fit because it combines historical data with domain/page-level citation analysis and competitor benchmarking. Ahrefs Ahrefs

If your goal is specifically tracking how often your domain is cited by AI assistants over time (not just general “AI mentions”), I’d look at AI visibility / answer-engine optimization platforms. The market is still new, but these are some of the stronger options:

My shortlist by use case

• You run SEO/content for a company: Start with Citations.io or Ranklogs. They are closer to the workflow of “which pages should we improve to get cited?” citations.io Ranklogs
• You need executive reporting: Look at Profound or HyperFound for dashboards and competitive visibility reporting. HyperFound
• You care most about citations (your domain appearing as a source): Prioritize tools that separate: - brand mention
• domain citation
• cited URL/page
• competitor citation share

CitePrism is one example that emphasizes these distinctions. CitePrism

Metrics I would insist the platform tracks

A useful tool should show:

1. Citation rate

• “In 1,000 tracked AI answers, your domain was cited 83 times.”
• Citation share over time

• Your domain vs competitors month-by-month.
• AI engine breakdown

• ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs Perplexity.
• Prompt-level history

• “For ‘best CRM for startups,’ you went from 5% visibility → 22%.”
• Exact cited URLs

• Not just “your brand appeared,” but which pages AI trusted.
• Competitor displacement

• “Competitor X replaced you in 37 answers this month.”

If you are starting from zero, I would probably test Citations.io, Ranklogs, and HyperFound side-by-side for a month using the same 20–50 customer-intent prompts, then choose based on data quality rather than dashboard features. HyperFound citations.io Ranklogs

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants, and how that has changed over time,” my top pick is otterly.ai.

Why OtterlyAI fits especially well

• Domain citation tracking: It tracks the URLs/domains cited in AI-generated answers and lets you see citation counts and changes over time. Otterly Otterly
• Historical trends: Its Domain Coverage Over Time report specifically charts your domain's citation rate over a selected period, so you can see whether visibility is increasing or falling. Otterly
• Prompt-level history: You can see which prompts generated citations and how citation counts accumulate across repeated monitoring runs. Otterly
• Multiple AI engines: It monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, depending on the configuration. Otterly
• Competitive comparison: You can compare your domain's citation coverage against competitors rather than looking at your numbers in isolation. Otterly
• API access: If you eventually want to put the data into your own BI dashboard, OtterlyAI also exposes citation and visibility data through an API. Otterly

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure citations in monitored AI responses, not actual organic referral traffic from AI assistants. So I'd use citation history as a visibility/authority KPI, and separately track AI referral traffic in your analytics stack.

Two alternatives worth evaluating

• peec.ai — particularly good if you care more about overall AI visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice. It also provides citation intelligence and frequency trends across AI platforms. Peec AI
• tryprofound.com — a stronger option if you're building a more enterprise-oriented Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) program and want citation intelligence tied to content strategy and competitive research. Profound

My ranking for your specific requirement:

1. OtterlyAI — best match for historical domain citation tracking
2. Peec AI — best for broader AI visibility/share-of-voice analytics
3. Profound — best for enterprise AEO/citation intelligence

If you tell me your domain, approximate monthly budget, and whether you care about ChatGPT specifically or all AI assistants, I can narrow this down to the best option and compare their pricing/data retention.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain is being cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time,” my top recommendation is scrunch.com.

Why Scrunch fits

• Domain + URL-level citation tracking — see which pages on your site are being cited, not just whether your brand is mentioned.
• Historical trends — its Citations dashboard lets you compare citation activity over time, including week-over-week changes and custom date ranges. Scrunch Scrunch
• Prompt-level attribution — you can see which prompts generated citations to your pages and the actual AI responses behind them.
• Cross-assistant tracking — it covers ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Meta AI and Copilot. Scrunch
• Competitive benchmarking — you can see which competitor and third-party domains are winning citations for the same prompts.
• Useful citation metrics — including citation consistency and an Influence Score, rather than just a raw citation count. Scrunch

Two strong alternatives

otterly.ai — probably the best choice if you want something more straightforward and relatively inexpensive. It tracks cited URLs and provides citation trends over time, with daily monitoring across major AI engines. Otterly Otterly

tryprofound.com — I'd look at this if you're an enterprise marketing/SEO team and want deeper AI-search analytics, reporting and larger-scale monitoring. It tends to make more sense for sophisticated enterprise programs than for simply answering “are AI assistants citing my domain more than they were six months ago?”

My pick

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure citations generated from a defined set of tracked prompts, rather than literally observing every AI assistant conversation on the internet. So I'd evaluate them based on prompt coverage + historical consistency, not just the headline number of citations.

If you tell me your domain and whether you're B2B, ecommerce, media, SaaS, etc., I can also recommend the best platform specifically for your use case and compare pricing, AI engines, historical data retention, API/export, and citation granularity.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants, and how that has changed over time,” my top recommendation is otterly.ai.

Why OtterlyAI fits

• Domain citation history: It tracks how often your domain and individual URLs are cited in AI-generated answers, with citation trends over time. OtterlyAI OtterlyAI
• Multiple AI engines: It monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude. Otterly
• Daily tracking: Your tracked prompts are monitored daily, allowing you to build a genuine time series rather than relying on occasional spot checks. OtterlyAI
• URL-level detail: You can see which pages are being cited, the prompts that generated those citations, and whether your brand was mentioned in the answer. Otterly
• Competitor comparison: You can compare your domain's citation coverage against competing domains over the same period. OtterlyAI
• Historical trend views: Its Domain Coverage Over Time specifically shows your domain's citation rate as a percentage trend across a selected period. OtterlyAI

Two alternatives worth considering

• tryprofound.com — stronger choice if you're an enterprise SEO/GEO team. It tracks citation share by platform, topic, and prompt and lets you analyze your sources versus competitors. Profound Profound
• peec.ai — a good, relatively focused option for visibility + citation tracking. It reports daily visibility trends and lets you inspect source citations at both domain and URL level. Peec AI Peec AI

My pick: OtterlyAI if the specific KPI you care about is “citations to my domain over time.” Its citation reporting is particularly aligned with that use case, rather than just measuring whether your brand name appeared in an AI answer. Otterly

If you tell me your domain + whether you're primarily interested in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, or all of them, I can also compare the best 3 platforms on historical depth, citation accuracy, API access, pricing, and competitor tracking.

If you want to track historical trends of your domain being cited by AI assistants (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, etc.), you’re looking for an AI visibility / GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) monitoring platform rather than a traditional SEO rank tracker.

Here are the strongest options:

My recommendation by use case

• You run a company website and want “Are AI assistants citing my domain more or less over time?”

→ Start with Citations.io or CiteWatch. They are closest to the exact problem: citation tracking rather than just mentions. Citations.io CiteWatch

• You’re doing SEO/content marketing and want an AI equivalent of Google Search Console + rank tracking

→ Look at Rank.ai or Ahrefs AI Visibility. Rank.ai Ahrefs

• You need competitor intelligence (“AI cites competitors instead of us”)

→ Rank.ai, Seerly, and Citations.io have stronger competitive views. Rank.ai Seerly

Before choosing, check that the tool can report:

• citation URL (not just brand mention)
• assistant/model breakdown (ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs Perplexity)
• tracked prompt history
• competitor citation share
• whether citations are new, lost, or unchanged
• exportable reports/API access if you need dashboards

If you tell me your use case (SEO agency, SaaS company, publisher, ecommerce, personal brand, etc.) and approximate budget, I can narrow this to the best 1–2 choices.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain is cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time,” I’d recommend OtterlyAI.

Why OtterlyAI is the best fit

• Tracks domain-level citations over time — you can see how often your site is cited and whether that rate is rising or falling. help.otterly.aihelp.otterly.aiotterly.ai
• Covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude. otterly.aiwww.tryprofound.compeec.ai
• Lets you drill down from your domain → individual URLs → prompts → AI engine that produced the citation. otterly.ai
• Supports competitor comparison, so you can see whether your citation share is improving relative to competing domains. help.otterly.ai
• It maintains historical data rather than giving you only a current snapshot; its citation reports include citation trends over selected periods. help.otterly.aihelp.otterly.aiotterly.ai

A particularly useful metric: Domain Coverage Over Time — essentially the percentage of tracked AI responses in which your domain appears as a cited source. help.otterly.ai

Two strong alternatives

Profound — I'd consider this if you're doing enterprise-level GEO/AEO. It has detailed citation-share analysis, watched-page trends, competitor citations, and breakdowns by platform, topic, and prompt. www.tryprofound.com

Peec AI — particularly interesting if you want both brand visibility and source/citation visibility. It refreshes tracked prompts daily and lets you distinguish between your content being used by an AI system and your URL being explicitly cited. peec.ai

My pick: OtterlyAI if the KPI you care about is specifically “Is my domain becoming a more frequently cited source in AI answers over the months?” It appears to have the most directly aligned reporting for that use case. help.otterly.aihelp.otterly.aiotterly.ai

If you tell me your domain and whether you're mainly interested in ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity, or all of them, I can also recommend the best tool based on price, historical depth, and API/export capabilities.

If your goal is specifically tracking how often your domain is cited or mentioned by AI assistants over time (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, etc.), you want an AI visibility / LLM optimization platform rather than a traditional SEO rank tracker.

Here are some strong options:

My shortlist by use case

• You run SEO/content marketing: Start with Ahrefs AI Visibility Index. It gives you broad market visibility data and competitor benchmarking. Ahrefs
• You care specifically about “does ChatGPT/Claude cite my domain?”: Look at Citations.io or LLM Pulse. They are more focused on citation-level tracking rather than general AI search visibility. Citations LLM Pulse
• You manage enterprise SEO: DemandSphere is designed for larger reporting workflows and combines LLM tracking with traditional search analytics. DemandSphere

When evaluating, I’d make sure the platform can show:

• Citation URL (which page on your domain was cited)
• AI engine/model breakdown (ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs Perplexity)
• Prompt-level history (“what questions caused the citation?”)
• Competitor citation share
• Date-over-date trends (not just a current score)

One caveat: AI citation tracking is still a young category. Different tools sample different prompts and models, so the absolute “visibility score” is less important than having a consistent methodology and trend line over time. presenc.ai

If you tell me your domain type (SaaS, ecommerce, publisher, local business, etc.) and which assistants matter most (ChatGPT only vs all LLMs), I can narrow this down.

If your main requirement is historical tracking of how often your domain is cited by AI assistants, my top recommendation is Semrush’s AI Visibility Toolkit.

Best fit: Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

semrush.com

It specifically tracks:

• Citations — how many AI responses cite your domain.
• Cited pages — which URLs on your site are being cited.
• Mentions — when your brand appears even without a citation.
• Historical trends — daily data for recent periods and monthly historical data going back further.
• Platform breakdowns — including ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode.
• Specific prompts triggering your citations, so you can understand why you're being cited. Semrush Semrush

That makes it particularly good if your question is literally "Is my domain getting cited more or less by AI over time?", rather than simply "what is my AI visibility score?"

Strong alternative: Ahrefs Brand Radar

ahrefs.com

I'd choose Ahrefs Brand Radar if you're already an Ahrefs user. It has historical AI visibility data, tracks cited pages/domains, and provides citation trend charts. Its current database covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. Ahrefs Ahrefs

One particularly useful distinction is "Found in" vs. "Cited in"—you can see whether AI systems are finding your content but choosing not to cite it. Ahrefs

Another good option: OtterlyAI

otterly.ai

Otterly is more purpose-built around ongoing AI-search monitoring. It tracks brand mentions and website citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, with selectable historical windows. Otterly

My ranking for your specific use case:

1. Semrush — best overall for historical citation analytics and reporting.
2. Ahrefs Brand Radar — best if you already use Ahrefs / want deep SEO + AI integration.
3. OtterlyAI — best if you want a dedicated AI-search monitoring product.

One caveat: these platforms aren't measuring every real ChatGPT conversation on the internet. They sample/execute large sets of prompts and measure the resulting AI responses. So I'd treat the metric as "citation share across a consistent tracked prompt set", which is much more useful for measuring trends than trying to estimate every AI answer.

If you tell me your domain + whether you're mainly interested in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or all of them, I can narrow this down to the best platform and pricing tier.

Another good option: OtterlyAI

otterly.ai

Otterly is more purpose-built around ongoing AI-search monitoring. It tracks brand mentions and website citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, with selectable historical windows.

My ranking for your specific use case:

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants over time”, I’d recommend tryprofound.com.

Why Profound is the best fit

Profound is particularly strong on citation-level analytics, rather than just measuring whether your brand was mentioned.

• Tracks actual citations to your domain and individual URLs across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and other answer engines. Profound
• Lets you see citation share over time, including day-over-day changes and comparisons with competitors. Profound
• Its Watched Pages feature lets you monitor whether individual URLs are gaining or losing citations over time—which is useful for measuring the impact of content updates. Profound
• You can break citation data down by AI platform, topic, and prompt and identify which third-party sources are influencing AI answers in your category. Profound
• It distinguishes your owned citations from competitor and earned-media citations, which makes it much more useful for SEO/GEO analysis.

A strong alternative: Peec AI

peec.ai is probably the better choice if you want a broader AI visibility dashboard rather than citation analytics alone.

It tracks visibility, position, sentiment, share of voice, mentions, and citations across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and others. Its data is refreshed daily, so you can build historical trends by model and prompt. Peec AI Peec AI

Importantly, Peec distinguishes between:

• Brand mention — AI explicitly names your brand.
• Source usage — your content was used to generate the answer.
• Citation — your URL was explicitly referenced in the answer. Peec AI

That distinction is valuable if your question is specifically “Is AI actually using my website as a source?”

My recommendation

For your exact wording, I'd start with Profound. It is closer to an “AI citation analytics” product than a generic AI-rank tracker. Profound

One caveat: these platforms generally measure citations in a defined set of tracked prompts, not every AI response generated anywhere on the internet. So I'd evaluate how well each platform's prompt coverage, historical retention, model coverage, and sampling methodology match your use case before committing.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants, and how that has changed over time,” I’d recommend otterly.ai.

Why OtterlyAI is a strong fit

• Domain-level citation tracking: It tracks which domains and individual URLs AI search engines cite, rather than only tracking whether your brand was mentioned. Otterly Otterly
• Historical trends: Its Domain Coverage Over Time metric shows your domain's citation rate as a percentage over a selected period, making it useful for measuring whether visibility is increasing or declining. Otterly AI
• Citation-level history: You can drill into an individual URL and see its citations over time, including the prompts and AI engines responsible for those citations. Otterly
• Multiple AI engines: It monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot. Otterly AI
• Competitive benchmarking: You can compare your domain's citation coverage with competitors and see where they're being cited instead of you. Otterly AI
• Daily monitoring: Prompts are automatically monitored daily, giving you a genuine time series rather than occasional snapshots. Otterly AI

Two alternatives worth considering

tryprofound.com — I'd consider this if you're running a larger enterprise AEO/GEO program. It focuses heavily on citation share, source categorization, and understanding which publishers/pages are influencing AI answers. Profound

peec.ai — Particularly good if you care about AI visibility + share of voice alongside citations. It refreshes tracked prompts daily and distinguishes between your content being used as a source and your URL being explicitly cited. Peec AI

My pick

For your specific wording, I'd start with OtterlyAI. Its Domain Coverage Over Time and citation-level history are unusually close to the exact metric you're describing.

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure citations from tracked AI-search prompts, not literally every AI assistant interaction occurring on the internet. That's the practical way to build a reproducible historical series. Otterly AI

If you tell me your domain and whether you're primarily interested in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, or all of them, I can also recommend the best platform based on your use case and budget.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain is being cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time,” I’d shortlist these:

• rankscale.ai — my top pick for citation history. It specifically tracks which domains and URLs are cited in AI answers, with historical charts for citation volume, category distribution, and brand share. It covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and 17+ engines. Rankscale.ai
• indexly.ai — best if you also care about traffic. It tracks daily mentions, citations, sentiment and AI referral traffic, with trends by engine. Indexly
• otterly.ai — good all-around option. It monitors brand mentions and website citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. Otterly
• ahrefs.com — best if you're already an Ahrefs user. Its dataset is particularly broad: it says it analyzes 473M+ real prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity and Google AI surfaces, with monthly visibility data. Ahrefs
• citations.io — simplest citation-focused dashboard. It shows citations, competitors, share of answer and a 90-day trend across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude. Citations.io

What I'd choose

Rankscale if you literally want to answer:

“How many times was mydomain.com cited by AI over the last 6/12 months, which URLs were cited, and is my share increasing or declining?”

It appears closest to that exact use case because it treats domain/URL citations as the primary metric, rather than just giving you a generic AI visibility score. Rankscale.ai

One important caveat: these platforms generally measure controlled prompt monitoring, not every AI conversation happening in the wild. So “citations over time” means citations observed from the prompts/queries they monitor. That distinction matters when interpreting a historical trend.

If you tell me your domain + whether you're interested in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, or all of them, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare their pricing, historical depth, APIs, and citation-level data.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain gets cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time,” I’d recommend otterly.ai.

Why OtterlyAI fits

• Tracks actual URL citations, not just whether your brand was mentioned. You can see which pages on your domain are being cited and how frequently. Otterly Otterly
• Historical trend data: its Citation Details view shows citations over time, so you can identify whether a URL is gaining or losing AI visibility. Otterly OtterlyAI
• Multiple AI platforms: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude. Otterly
• Daily monitoring: prompts are automatically run daily, giving you a consistent time series rather than occasional snapshots. OtterlyAI
• You can break results down by engine, country, prompt, URL, and competitor, which is useful if you're trying to measure GEO/AEO efforts. OtterlyAI

Two alternatives worth considering

peec.ai is probably my second choice. It explicitly distinguishes source citations from brand mentions and tracks citation frequency at both domain and URL level, with daily data. Peec AI Peec AI

tryprofound.com is more enterprise-oriented. Its citation tooling tracks which answer engines cite your content, how frequently, and across which prompts, with competitor/source analysis. Profound

My pick: OtterlyAI if the historical citation graph for your domain/pages is the core requirement. Peec if you also care heavily about broader AI visibility/share-of-voice analytics.

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure citations observed in AI search/answer experiences generated from tracked prompts. They aren't measuring every time an underlying model internally “knows about” or uses your domain—something that isn't directly observable. This distinction matters when interpreting the historical numbers. Otterly

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants, and how that has changed over time,” I’d shortlist these:

Best fit: indexly.ai

Indexly looks like the strongest match for your specific use case. It tracks:

• Citation counts over time for your domain
• Individual URLs/pages on your site that get cited
• Citation share versus competitors
• Per-engine data across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and Google AI Overviews
• Daily tracking with full historical retention
• Historical charts broken down by AI model and page Indexly Indexly

The particularly useful feature is per-page citation history: you can see which pages AI assistants cited this week and which pages used to be cited but aren't anymore. That's much more actionable than a generic "AI visibility score." Indexly

Good alternative: rankscale.ai

Rankscale is worth considering if you want more competitive/citation-landscape analysis. It tracks citation volume, domain share, URL share, and category trends over time across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and 17+ AI engines. Rankscale

If you want a broader GEO platform: amicited.com

AmICited tracks prompts daily across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode and Grok, with visibility and citation trends over time. It's more oriented toward overall AI-search optimization than purely historical citation analytics. Am I Cited

My recommendation

For your exact wording, I'd start with Indexly. Its distinction between mentions, citations, citation share, and which specific pages are gaining/losing citations over time is especially valuable. Indexly

One important caveat: these platforms generally measure repeatedly querying AI assistants with a defined prompt set, rather than having access to some universal historical database of everything ChatGPT/Claude/etc. have ever cited. So the quality of your historical trend depends heavily on the prompts and engines you configure.

If your specific goal is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants, and how that has changed over time,” I’d shortlist these:

• otterly.ai — best fit for straightforward historical citation tracking. It tracks cited domains and URLs across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude, with citation trends over time. Its Domain Coverage chart specifically shows your domain’s citation rate over a selected period, including comparisons with competitors. Otterly OtterlyAI
• tryprofound.com — better for enterprise-grade analysis. Its Citation Share charts show day-to-day changes, while Watched Pages lets you track citation volume for individual URLs over time. It also lets you compare citation share by platform, topic, prompt, and competitor. Profound Profound Knowledge Base
• Microsoft Clarity AI Visibility — worth checking if you want a lower-friction option. Its Citation dashboard reports which pages on your domain are cited, citation counts, grounding queries, and changes over time. Microsoft Learn
• Bing Webmaster Tools AI Performance — particularly interesting if you primarily care about your own site's citations. It has a timeline of citation volume, page-level citation activity, and grounding queries, with custom historical date ranges. Search - Microsoft Bing

My pick

Start with OtterlyAI if the primary KPI is “How is my domain's AI citation footprint changing month over month?” It is unusually explicit about domain/URL citations, rather than just giving you a generic AI visibility score. It also supports CSV exports, which is useful if you want to build your own long-term dashboard. Otterly OtterlyAI

If you're running a serious SEO/GEO program and need citation share vs. competitors, granular prompt analysis, and content strategy workflows, I'd choose Profound instead. Profound

One important distinction: these tools generally measure citations by running a defined set of prompts against AI search experiences and recording the resulting answers. They're not measuring every AI conversation happening worldwide. So the historical trend is best interpreted as “citation visibility across my tracked query set,” not an absolute count of all times your domain was cited by AI. Otterly Profound

Yes. My first recommendation is otterly.ai if your core requirement is specifically “show me how often my domain is being cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time.”

Why it fits:

• Domain-level citation tracking: it tracks the URLs/domains that AI search experiences cite, including your own pages and competitors. Otterly Otterly
• Historical trends: its citation reporting shows whether a URL's citation frequency is rising or falling, and breaks that down by prompt and AI engine. Otterly
• Multiple assistants: it monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot, among others. Otterly Otterly
• Competitive benchmarking: you can see which domains are being cited instead of yours and compare visibility/share of voice. Otterly
• Daily/weekly monitoring: the platform says it tracks citation changes over time rather than giving you just a one-off AI visibility snapshot. Otterly

The alternatives I'd consider

tryprofound.com is the one I'd investigate if you're an enterprise and want deeper source-level intelligence. SEO Counselors

Interestingly, Indexly explicitly advertises a complete daily history for each tracked prompt, including citation share by domain and comparisons across days/weeks/months. Indexly

If you tell me your domain and whether you're looking for SEO reporting, competitive intelligence, or measuring the impact of your GEO/content work, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 options and compare their pricing and historical-data capabilities.

If your goal is specifically “how often is my domain being cited by AI assistants, and how has that changed over time?”, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 Best fit: peec.ai

Peec is probably the closest match to what you described.

• Tracks source visibility separately from brand mentions—so it can tell you when yourdomain.com is used/cited even when your brand isn't mentioned. Peec.ai Docs Peec.ai Docs
• Provides domain- and URL-level citation metrics, including retrievals and citation rates. Peec.ai Docs
• Lets you see trends over time and break them down by AI engine, prompt, topic, country, and competitor. Peec.ai Docs
• Covers major engines including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. Peec
• It also distinguishes between content that was merely used as a source and content that was explicitly cited in the visible answer, which is a particularly useful distinction. Peec.ai Docs

I'd pick Peec if your KPI is:

“What percentage of AI answers are using/citing my domain, and is that going up or down?”

🥈 Best for deeper citation intelligence: tryprofound.com

Profound is stronger if you're running a larger GEO/AEO program rather than simply monitoring citations.

It tracks citation share by domain and page, with daily historical granularity, and lets you analyze citation performance by platform, topic, and prompt. Profound Profound

It also has useful views for identifying which specific pages and third-party publishers are winning citations from AI engines. Profound Knowledge Base

I'd pick Profound if your KPI is:

“Which pages and domains are winning AI citations, why are competitors winning them, and what should my content team do about it?”

My recommendation

For your exact wording, start with Peec AI. Its distinction between brand visibility vs. source/domain visibility is unusually well aligned with measuring whether your website itself is becoming a source for AI assistants. Peec.ai Docs

If you're evaluating this for an SEO/GEO team and need competitive citation intelligence, page-level analysis, and APIs, I'd put Profound alongside it in the evaluation.

One important caveat: these platforms generally measure citations from tracked prompts/queries, rather than having omniscient access to every AI conversation happening on the internet. So I'd treat the trend as “citation rate across a representative tracked query set”, not literally “all citations of my domain worldwide.”

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants, and how that has changed over time,” I’d shortlist these:

• indexly.ai — my top pick. It tracks daily citation counts at the individual-URL level, broken down by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and Google AI Overviews. It also keeps full historical data, so you can see which pages gained or lost citations over time. Indexly Indexly
• citations.io — best if you want a simpler marketing dashboard. It tracks citation/share-of-answer trends across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude, including competitors and a 90-day trend view. Citations.io
• kitbase.dev — good for prompt-level analysis. It distinguishes being mentioned vs. actually cited, and provides per-engine trends, competitor movement, and the exact URLs being cited. Kitbase
• ai-visibility.io — worth considering if you mainly need month-over-month reporting. It explicitly provides historical trends, per-engine scores, average position, competitor comparisons, and CSV export. AI Visibility

What I'd choose

Indexly if you're serious about measuring the actual citation footprint of your domain. The important distinction is that it goes beyond a proprietary “AI visibility score”: you can see which URLs on your domain were cited, how many times, by which engine, and how that changed historically. Indexly

One caveat: AI citation measurement is inherently noisy because assistants can return different sources for the same prompt at different times. A recent research paper specifically argues that citation metrics should be treated as estimates with uncertainty rather than perfectly stable numbers. arxiv.org

If you tell me your domain + whether you care about ChatGPT only or all major assistants, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare historical depth, engines, URL-level citation tracking, API/export, and price.

If you want to track how often your domain is cited by AI assistants over time (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, etc.), you’re looking for an AI visibility / generative engine optimization (GEO) analytics platform rather than a traditional SEO tool.

My top recommendations:

My pick by use case

• You run a website and want “Is AI recommending/citing me more over time?”

→ LLM Pulse or Citations.io. They are closest to an SEO rank tracker, but for AI answers. Citations LLM Pulse

• You care specifically about domain citations (which URLs AI systems reference):

→ Slate or Indexly. They emphasize citation sources and trends. Indexly Slate

• You’re doing serious GEO/content strategy:

→ Presenc AI because its positioning is around historical trend analysis and prompt-level changes. Presenc AI

A few metrics I’d make sure the platform supports:

• Citation rate: % of tracked AI answers that cite your domain
• Citation share of voice: your share vs competitors
• Cited URLs: which pages on your domain are being referenced
• Prompt history: exactly which questions caused citations
• Model breakdown: ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs Perplexity
• Trend lines: weekly/monthly changes rather than just a current score

One caveat: these tools generally cannot know every organic AI response ever generated. They usually create a monitoring panel by repeatedly running a set of prompts and recording responses, so the quality of your historical data depends on how long you’ve been tracking and how well the prompt set represents your audience. Presenc AI Mention.se

If you tell me your domain type (SaaS, ecommerce, publisher, local business, etc.) and whether you care more about ChatGPT citations specifically or all AI engines, I can narrow this to the best 1–2 options.

If your specific goal is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants, and how that has changed over time,” my top recommendation is OtterlyAI.

Why OtterlyAI fits especially well

• Domain citation tracking: it tracks the URLs/domains cited in AI answers, rather than only whether your brand was mentioned. otterly.aihelp.otterly.ai
• Historical trends: its Domain Coverage Over Time shows your domain's citation rate across a selected period, so you can see growth, declines, and changes after publishing or optimizing content. otterly.aihelp.otterly.ai
• Citation-level history: you can drill into an individual URL and see its citation trend over time, including which prompts and AI engines produced the citations. otterly.ai
• Multiple assistants/search engines: it currently covers ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot and others. otterly.ai
• Daily monitoring: tracked prompts are monitored daily, with domain-citation counts available at the prompt level. help.otterly.ai
• Data export: citation data can be exported to CSV, which is useful if you want to build your own long-term dashboard. help.otterly.ai

Two alternatives worth considering

Profound — probably the stronger choice if you're an enterprise SEO/GEO team. It has citation share, historical trends, watched pages, competitor benchmarking, and daily prompt/citation collection across a broad set of answer engines. www.tryprofound.com

Peec AI — good if you care more broadly about AI visibility/share of voice, while still wanting to identify which sources are being cited and how citation frequency changes. peec.ai

My pick: OtterlyAI for your stated use case. Its distinction between brand mentions and actual domain citations, plus the historical citation charts, is exactly what I'd want for answering “Is AI increasingly using my website as a source?” otterly.aihelp.otterly.ai

If you tell me your domain and whether you're primarily interested in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or all of them, I can also compare the platforms on price, historical data depth, API/export capabilities, and citation accuracy.

If your main goal is “How often is my domain being cited by AI assistants, and is that going up or down over time?”, I’d recommend OtterlyAI.

Why OtterlyAI is a strong fit

• Domain citation tracking: It tracks the URLs/domains AI search experiences cite and lets you see citation trends over time. otterly.ai
• Historical trend charts: Its Domain Coverage Over Time report shows your domain's citation rate across a selected period, including changes after content optimization. help.otterly.ai
• Multiple AI engines: It monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, and others. otterly.ai
• Prompt-level detail: You can see which questions resulted in your URLs being cited and which AI engine produced the citation. otterly.ai
• Competitor comparison: You can compare your domain's citation coverage with competitors rather than looking at your numbers in isolation. help.otterly.ai
• API access: If you eventually want to put the data into your own BI/SEO dashboard, OtterlyAI has a public API covering citation and visibility data. otterly.ai

I'd pick OtterlyAI specifically if domain citations are the KPI you care about.

One alternative worth considering

Profound is probably the stronger choice if you're an enterprise SEO/GEO team. Its Answer Engine Insights product tracks Citation Share, top citation domains/pages, watched URLs, competitors, and day-to-day citation-share changes across AI platforms. www.tryprofound.com

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure citations observed in tracked AI-search responses, not some universal database of everything an LLM has ever cited. The quality of the historical trend therefore depends on the prompts, engines, geography, and monitoring frequency you configure. otterly.ai

If you tell me your domain + whether you're mainly interested in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, or all of them, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 tools and compare pricing/data retention.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain gets cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time,” my top pick is Otterly.AI.

Why Otterly.AI

• Domain citation history: tracks how often your domain and individual URLs are cited, with trends over time. otterly.aihelp.otterly.ai
• Multiple AI engines: covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and others. otterly.ai
• Competitor comparison: you can see your domain's citation coverage alongside competitors. otterly.aihelp.otterly.ai
• Prompt-level attribution: you can drill into the prompts that generated citations and see which engine produced them. otterly.ai
• Useful historical views: its current citation reporting includes date-range filtering and citation-over-time charts, so you can correlate changes with content/SEO work. help.otterly.ai
• API/export: useful if you eventually want to put the data into your own BI dashboard. otterly.ai

A particularly good alternative is Profound. It's more enterprise/AEO-oriented and has strong citation-share analysis: it tracks citation share by platform, topic and prompt, plus historical changes to individual pages ("Watched Pages"). www.tryprofound.com

Another option worth looking at is Peec AI if you care about the individual URL level. Its URL analytics show retrieval/citation trends, models, triggering prompts, and the actual AI chats where a URL was used. docs.peec.ai

My ranking

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure citations in a defined set of tracked prompts, rather than magically measuring every AI response on the internet. Otterly, for example, runs your tracked prompts regularly and analyzes the resulting answers. help.otterly.ai

If I were choosing specifically for your stated use case, I'd start with Otterly.AI. If you tell me your approximate domain size and whether you're looking for SEO-team use, an enterprise dashboard, or a lightweight/cheap tool, I can narrow it down to the best 2–3 options and compare pricing/features.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants over time”, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 Best fit: OtterlyAI

OtterlyAI is probably the closest match to what you described.

• Tracks domain citations, not just brand mentions.
• Shows Domain Coverage Over Time, so you can see your citation rate rising/falling historically.
• Lets you break results down by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
• You can drill into individual URLs and see citation trends over time, the prompts where the URL was cited, and which engine produced the citation.
• It supports custom date ranges and competitor comparisons. otterly.ai

Why I'd choose it: your question is specifically about domain citations over time, and Otterly makes that a first-class metric rather than treating it as a side effect of brand visibility.

🥈 Profound — better for enterprise/deeper analysis

Profound is stronger if you want a broader AI-search intelligence platform.

Its Citation Share metric measures how often your domain is cited, with historical day-to-day trends, platform/topic/prompt breakdowns, competitor comparisons, and individual watched-page tracking. It covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and other answer engines. www.tryprofound.com

One particularly useful distinction: Profound also has historical prompt-volume data, with ChatGPT history going back to January 2025 in the US and other platforms from July 2025. help.tryprofound.com

🥉 Peec AI — good if you care about visibility + citations

Peec AI tracks visibility, position, share of voice, sentiment, and the sources AI engines cite. It runs prompts daily and lets you compare citation/visibility performance across engines and competitors. peec.ai

My recommendation:
If you literally want a chart like “mydomain.com citations: 12 → 27 → 43 → 38 → 71 over the last 12 months”, start with OtterlyAI. If you want to build a more sophisticated AI-search measurement program involving competitors, topics, prompt demand, and citation share, I'd look at Profound.

One important caveat: these platforms generally measure citations from a defined set of prompts they repeatedly monitor. They aren't literally observing every AI assistant conversation on the internet. So the historical trend is best interpreted as “citation rate across my tracked AI-search queries,” not an absolute count of every time your domain was cited. otterly.ai

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain has been cited by AI assistants over time,” I’d recommend OtterlyAI.

Why it fits especially well:

• Domain-level citation tracking: It measures how often your website is cited across tracked AI answers, rather than only counting brand mentions. help.otterly.ai
• Historical trends: Its Domain Coverage Over Time chart shows your citation rate as a percentage over a selected period, so you can see whether visibility is increasing or falling. help.otterly.ai
• Citation-level history: You can drill into individual URLs and see citation trends over time, including which prompts and AI engines generated those citations. otterly.ai
• Multiple AI engines: It currently tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot. otterly.ai
• Competitor benchmarking: You can compare your domain's citation coverage with competing domains. help.otterly.ai

My shortlist

Peec, for example, explicitly tracks citations, mentions, position and sentiment daily and provides week-over-week comparisons. peec.ai Profound is generally positioned toward enterprise teams with more extensive AI-search analytics. technologyadvice.com

If you tell me your domain and whether you're interested in ChatGPT specifically, or all AI engines, I can also recommend the best tool based on the exact historical data you want to measure.

If your goal is specifically “How often is my domain being cited by AI assistants, and how has that changed over time?”, I’d recommend OtterlyAI.

Why it fits particularly well:

• Domain citation tracking: It measures how often your website/domain is actually cited in AI answers, not just whether your brand is mentioned. help.otterly.ai
• Historical trends: Its Citation Details view shows citations over time, so you can see whether individual URLs are gaining or losing citations. otterly.ai
• Multiple AI engines: It tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot and others. otterly.ai
• Prompt-level attribution: You can drill down from a citation → the prompt that generated it → the AI answer → the engine that cited you. otterly.ai
• Competitive benchmarking: You can compare your citation/visibility against competitors and identify third-party pages that AI systems are favoring instead. www.tryprofound.com

One important distinction

There are actually two different things you might want to track:

1. AI citation visibility — “When people ask AI questions relevant to my business, does AI cite my domain?”

→ OtterlyAI is a strong fit.

2. AI crawler/agent traffic to your site — “Are ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, etc. actually visiting my website, and which pages?”

→ OtterlyAI also now has Agent Analytics, which analyzes server logs and provides per-engine visit trends. help.otterly.ai

If you're building a GEO/AI visibility dashboard, I'd probably use OtterlyAI as the starting point because it lets you track both the citation outcome and, increasingly, the AI-agent activity on your site.

Runner-up: Profound's AI Citation Tracking is worth evaluating if you're an enterprise SEO/AEO team. It offers citation share by platform, topic and prompt, plus watched-page trends. www.tryprofound.com

If you tell me your domain and whether you're looking for a free/cheap tool or enterprise-grade, I can compare the best 3–5 options specifically for historical domain-citation tracking.

Yes. If your specific goal is “how often is my domain being cited by AI assistants, and how has that changed over time?”, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 Best fit: Otterly.AI

Otterly.AI is probably the best match for your requirement.

Its Domain Citations reporting tracks how often your domain is used as a source across tracked AI prompts, and Domain Coverage Over Time gives you a historical citation-rate trend. You can also compare your domain against competitors. help.otterly.aiotterly.ai

It currently monitors engines including ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot, among others. help.otterly.aiotterly.ai

Why I'd choose it: it treats the citation/source URL as a first-class metric, rather than merely asking whether your brand was mentioned.

🥈 Profound — better for enterprise/deeper analytics

Profound is the one I'd investigate if you're running a serious enterprise SEO/GEO program.

It lets you see which answer engines cite your content, how frequently, and across which prompts, with citation-share analytics that can be broken down by date, model, region, hostname, prompt, topic, and other dimensions. www.tryprofound.com

One particularly useful distinction: Profound also has historical AI prompt-volume data, with U.S. data going back to January 2025 for ChatGPT and July 2025 for other platforms. That's useful if you want to understand whether the underlying demand is changing, not just your citation rate. help.tryprofound.com

🥉 Indexly — interesting if you want granular daily history

Indexly tracks citations at the individual prompt and URL level, including which domains were cited and how often. It says it maintains a daily history so you can compare weeks/months and see exactly when your pages gained or lost citation visibility. indexly.ai

My recommendation

For your exact wording, I'd start with Otterly.AI. The key feature to look for is not just brand mentions but domain citation rate over time. That's the closest analogue to “organic search visibility over time,” except for AI assistants.

One caveat: these platforms generally measure a defined set of tracked prompts run repeatedly, rather than having omniscient access to every ChatGPT/Gemini/Claude conversation. So the historical trend is best interpreted as AI citation visibility for your tracked query set, not the absolute number of times your domain has ever been cited across all AI usage. www.conbersa.ai

If you tell me your domain + whether you're B2B/B2C, I can also compare Otterly vs Profound vs Peec specifically for your use case, including pricing and which one gives you the cleanest historical citation dataset.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain gets cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time,” my first pick is Profound.

Profound

Why Profound is the best fit

• Tracks actual citations, not just whether your brand was mentioned. It shows citation share by platform, topic, and prompt. www.tryprofound.com
• Historical monitoring: its “Watched Pages” feature lets you track how citation volume for individual URLs changes over time. www.tryprofound.com
• Covers major answer engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and others. www.tryprofound.com
• You can compare your domain against competitors, including which domains are gaining or losing citation share.
• It goes beyond a single visibility score: you can examine which specific pages are being cited and for which prompts/topics.

Two alternatives worth considering

Peec AI — probably the strongest alternative if you want a simpler, more marketing-oriented interface. It tracks citations, mentions, position and sentiment daily, with week-over-week comparisons. peec.ai

Peec AI

Scrunch AI — interesting if you also care about which AI crawlers are actually visiting your site and connecting AI citations to referral traffic/conversions, rather than just measuring citation visibility. www.techradar.com

Scrunch AI

My recommendation

One important caveat: AI citation data is inherently noisy because the same prompt can produce different answers and citations at different times. Recent research specifically recommends treating citation visibility as a statistical estimate rather than a fixed number. arxiv.org

So if you're evaluating these specifically for a dashboard like “my domain's AI citation rate: Jan → Feb → Mar → …,” I'd start with Profound. It is the closest match to that use case rather than merely tracking brand mentions.

If your specific goal is “how often does AI cite my domain, and how is that changing over time?”, I’d recommend Peec AI.

Why it fits particularly well:

• Tracks domain citations separately from brand mentions. This is important: an AI assistant can cite yourdomain.com without actually mentioning your company name. Peec explicitly measures this distinction. peec.aidocs.peec.ai
• Historical trend data: you can track citation/visibility changes across repeated prompt runs rather than relying on a one-off snapshot. Peec says it updates tracking daily. peec.ai
• URL-level data: it shows which specific pages on your domain are being retrieved/cited, not just whether your domain appeared somewhere. peec.aidocs.peec.ai
• Multiple AI surfaces: it covers platforms including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. peec.ai
• Useful competitive context: you can compare your domain's citation/visibility against competitors and see which prompts are driving the differences. peec.ai

One important caveat

Don't treat an AI-citation percentage as an exact ground-truth metric. AI responses are nondeterministic: the same prompt can produce different sources at different times. Recent research specifically finds substantial variability in citation distributions, meaning trends based on repeated sampling are much more meaningful than individual observations. arxiv.org

My pick: Peec if historical domain citation tracking is the primary requirement.

If you tell me whether you're tracking one domain, a portfolio of sites, or competitors, I can also compare Peec vs. Profound vs. Ahrefs Brand Radar vs. Otterly specifically on historical citation data, granularity, AI platforms covered, and pricing.

If you mean tracking how often AI assistants cite your domain as a source over time (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, etc.), you’re looking for an AI visibility / AI citation tracking platform rather than traditional SEO rank tracking.

Here are the strongest options:

My shortlist by use case

• You run a SaaS/content site and want actionable SEO-like reporting: Surva.ai or Peec AI. dageno.aiwww.surva.ai
• You’re an enterprise brand tracking competitors: Profound. dageno.aiwww.surva.ai
• You mainly care “how often does my domain get cited as a source?”: Surva.ai or Citations.io. citations.iowww.surva.ai
• You want to track a fixed set of buyer questions over months: Hikoo Spotlight. www.tryhikoo.com

A few metrics I’d prioritize:

1. Citation share — % of tracked AI answers that cite your domain.
2. Citation count by URL — which pages are being surfaced.
3. AI engine breakdown — ChatGPT vs Perplexity vs Gemini vs Claude.
4. Competitor citation share — who is replacing you in answers.
5. Prompt-level history — whether visibility improves for the questions that matter.

One caveat: AI citation tracking is still a newer category. The most reliable systems usually measure a controlled set of prompts repeatedly over time, rather than claiming to know every AI answer users see. www.reddit.com

If you tell me your domain type (SaaS, ecommerce, publisher, local business, etc.) and whether you care more about ChatGPT citations specifically or all AI engines, I can narrow this down.

If your main requirement is “show me how often my domain gets cited by AI assistants, and how that changes over time,” my top pick is Profound.

Why Profound fits

• Tracks actual citations, not just brand mentions, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and other answer engines. www.tryprofound.com
• Gives you citation share over time, including day-over-day changes and comparisons with competitors.
• You can drill down to the specific URLs on your domain that AI systems cite.
• Its Watched Pages feature lets you monitor how citation volume for individual pages changes over time. www.tryprofound.com
• Data can be analyzed by platform, prompt, topic, region, and citation category, which is useful if you're trying to understand why your visibility changed. help.tryprofound.com
• It collects citation data daily, so you can build meaningful historical trends rather than relying on occasional spot checks. www.tryprofound.com

Two alternatives I'd consider

Peec AI — probably the better choice if you want a simpler marketing/SEO-oriented dashboard. It tracks visibility, position, sentiment, and citations, with daily tracking across engines including ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI surfaces. peec.ai

Citations.io — interesting if you specifically want a lightweight AI citation/visibility tracker. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude and exposes citation/share-of-answer trends. citations.io

My ranking for your use case

One important caveat: AI answers are non-deterministic—the same prompt can produce different citations at different times. Recent research specifically finds substantial variability in citation visibility, so I'd favor a platform that runs a consistent prompt set repeatedly rather than one that simply takes occasional snapshots. arxiv.org

If you give me your domain and roughly how many prompts you want to track (e.g. 50, 500, 5,000), I can recommend the best platform and plan for your specific situation.

Yes — OtterlyAI is probably the closest match to what you’re asking for.

My pick: OtterlyAI

It specifically tracks whether your domain is cited in AI-generated answers, rather than merely estimating AI-driven traffic.

You can monitor:

• Domain citations over time — how frequently your site is cited across tracked prompts.
• Citation trends — see whether individual URLs are gaining or losing citations.
• Engine-level performance across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot. help.otterly.ai
• Competitor domains — compare your citation share against other domains.
• The actual prompts and URLs generating the citations.
• Brand coverage — whether a page that gets cited actually mentions your brand. otterly.ai

The particularly relevant feature for you is Domain Coverage Over Time, which plots your domain's citation rate across a selected period so you can see whether visibility is improving or declining. help.otterly.ai

One important caveat

These platforms generally don't have a magical historical database of every AI citation your domain has ever received. OtterlyAI, for example, says tracking starts when you create the prompts/report; it doesn't backfill historical prompt data. help.otterly.ai

So if your goal is:

"I want to start tracking today and see whether my domain's AI citation share increases over the next 6–12 months."

OtterlyAI is a strong fit.

If instead you mean:

"I want a platform that already has historical AI-citation data going back months/years for my domain, without me having previously tracked it."

that's a substantially harder requirement, and I'd evaluate Profound, Semrush, Ahrefs, Scrunch, and OtterlyAI differently.

If you tell me your domain + whether you're B2B, ecommerce, media, SaaS, etc., I can shortlist the 3 best platforms specifically for historical AI citation/share-of-voice tracking, including pricing and what each actually measures.

If your main requirement is historical trends of your own domain being cited by AI assistants, I’d shortlist these:

1. DeepSmith — my top pick
   • Tracks citations separately from mentions, which is important.
   • Historical views by ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Mode.
   • Lets you view 7/30/90-day trends and the specific URLs being cited.
   • Runs tracked prompts on a schedule, so you build a longitudinal dataset rather than relying on a one-off check. deepsmith.ai

2. Ranklogs — best if history is the priority
   • Explicitly keeps history for every tracked prompt and engine.
   • Separates citation trends from simple mentions.
   • Good for seeing exactly when you gained or lost citations and whether visibility is trending up or down. ranklogs.com

3. CiteWatch — good lightweight option
   • Queries ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot and Perplexity regularly.
   • Tracks citation frequency, position within answers, and an overall visibility score over time. cite.watch

4. Ahrefs Brand Radar — worth considering if you already use Ahrefs
   • Particularly interesting because it builds tracked questions from real search-keyword data, rather than only manually invented prompts.
   • Also provides AI visibility/citation data across multiple AI engines. www.techradar.com

What I'd choose

For a serious GEO/AEO measurement program: DeepSmith.

For the simplest answer to “is my domain getting cited more or less over time?”: Ranklogs.

One important distinction: these platforms generally measure a controlled set of recurring prompts, not the entirety of what real users ask ChatGPT or Claude. So treat the trend as AI-search visibility on your tracked query set, rather than literal total citations across all AI usage.

If you tell me your domain + industry, I can also recommend the best platform specifically for your use case and compare pricing, engines, historical retention, API/export capabilities, and citation-level reporting.

If your primary requirement is historical trend tracking (not just a one-time AI visibility audit), I'd prioritize tools that repeatedly run prompts and maintain a time series of citations.

Best overall: urlLighthouseturn0search1

Best for: Marketing teams that want an enterprise-quality dashboard.

Pros:

• Tracks citations across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Copilot, and others
• Historical citation counts and visibility trends
• Page-level recommendations
• Competitor benchmarking
• Visibility score and sentiment tracking www.ahoylighthouse.com

Best specifically for historical citation trends: urlCiteWatchturn0search2

This is one of the few platforms that emphasizes tracking over time rather than just current visibility.

It tracks:

• Daily AI citation monitoring
• Historical charts
• Citation rate
• Share of Voice
• AI Visibility Score
• Position within AI answers
• Per-assistant breakdown (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity) cite.watch

Best for SEO teams: urlRankScopeturn0search5

Good if you're already measuring SEO alongside GEO.

Includes:

• Daily tracking
• Historical mention trends
• Citation source maps
• Share of Voice
• Sentiment
• Google AI Overviews alongside LLMs rankscope.ai

Best for prompt-level historical analysis: urlBourdturn0search3

Unique feature:

• Schedule weekly/monthly runs
• See citation history per prompt
• API for exporting historical data
• Unlimited prompts on paid plans bourd.dev

Good budget option: urlSEORav GEO Trackerturn0search0

Highlights:

• Weekly polling
• Full citation history
• Competitor comparison
• Stores historical results from day one www.seorav.com

If your goal is rigorous historical measurement

I'd look for these capabilities:

• Historical time series (weeks/months of data)
• Prompt-level history
• Citation snapshots you can replay
• Competitor share of voice
• Multiple AI assistants (not just ChatGPT)
• Ability to export historical data

Many newer "AI visibility" products only provide a current score. If you care about trend analysis, ensure the platform explicitly stores historical runs instead of overwriting them.

My recommendations by use case

If you're an SEO or content team that wants to answer questions like "How has our domain's citation rate in ChatGPT changed over the last six months?" or "Which content updates increased our AI citations?", I'd start with CiteWatch or Lighthouse because both focus on maintaining historical citation data rather than just providing a one-time audit.

If your priority is historical trend tracking (not just a one-time scan), these are the strongest options:

If I had to recommend one

CiteWatch is currently the closest match to your request because it is purpose-built around tracking whether AI assistants cite your domain over time. It includes:

• Historical citation counts
• Share of voice
• Citation rate
• Average position within AI answers
• Per-assistant breakdown (ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude vs Copilot vs Perplexity)
• Trend charts showing changes over days and weeks cite.watch

If you're doing serious GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)

I'd look at RankScope. In addition to tracking citations historically, it focuses on:

• AI citation rate
• Historical comparisons between time periods
• Citation source mapping
• AI content optimization recommendations
• Google AI Overviews alongside conversational assistants rankscope.aicite.watch

For agencies or larger teams

• Bourd is excellent if you want scheduled prompt runs and API access for reporting dashboards. bourd.dev
• Vauris is geared toward recurring reports, buyer-prompt monitoring, and client-friendly exports. vauris.ai

One limitation to know

No platform can measure every AI conversation. These tools typically:

1. Build a library of prompts relevant to your industry.
2. Run those prompts on a schedule across multiple AI assistants.
3. Record whether your domain is cited, recommended, or linked.
4. Plot those results over time to estimate your AI visibility. cite.watch

If you tell me:

• your domain,
• your industry, and
• whether you care more about ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, or Perplexity,

I can recommend the platform that's likely to provide the most representative tracking for your specific use case.

If you want to track how often your domain is cited by AI assistants over time (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, etc.), you’re looking for an AI visibility / AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) platform rather than a traditional SEO rank tracker.

Here are the strongest options:

My shortlist by use case

If you want “how often does AI cite my domain?”

• Start with Citations.io. It is closest to a citation-monitoring product: it logs when AI answers cite your site, which prompts triggered it, and competitor citation share. citations.io

If you’re doing SEO/AEO strategy for a brand

• Look at DeepSmith or AirPulse. They emphasize trend lines, visibility scores, and competitive movement rather than only raw citations. airpulse.aideepsmith.ai

If you need a research-grade dataset

• Consider Centium, because it focuses on the underlying citation records: which model, prompt, category, and URL produced the citation. centium.ai

A few metrics I’d make sure the platform provides:

• Citation rate: % of AI answers that link to your domain
• Mention rate: % where your brand/domain appears without a link
• Share of citations vs competitors
• Citation history by month/week
• Prompt-level tracking (“which questions cause AI to cite us?”)
• Source breakdown (your pages vs third-party pages mentioning you)

One caveat: AI citation data is inherently noisy because answers can vary between runs, so favor tools that aggregate many prompts over time rather than judging visibility from a handful of queries. arxiv.org

For most teams, I’d start by testing Citations.io or DeepSmith and compare whether their tracked prompts match the questions your customers actually ask. deepsmith.aicitations.io

If your goal is specifically tracking how often your own domain is cited by AI assistants over time (not just traditional SEO), I'd recommend one of these:

1. MentionGEO — Best overall for historical AI citation tracking

Best for: Marketing teams, startups, and SaaS companies

It tracks:

• Historical citation trends
• Domain citations (which URLs from your site get cited)
• ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI
• Share of voice
• Competitor comparisons
• Visibility score over time
• Prompt-level history

One standout feature is that it stores historical scans, so you can see whether your citation rate improved after publishing new content. mentiongeo.ai

2. GEOly — Best if citations are your primary KPI

This platform goes deeper into citation analytics:

• Historical citation rate
• Which pages of your domain are cited
• Citation sources
• Share of Model (AI share of voice)
• AI visibility score
• Daily tracking across multiple LLMs

If your main question is "How has my domain's citation frequency changed month over month?" this is one of the stronger options. www.geoly.ai

3. RankScope

Good for agencies and SEO teams.

Tracks:

• Citation rate
• Historical trends
• AI rankings
• Share of voice
• Sentiment
• Citation source map

It focuses on monitoring changes over time rather than one-off checks. rankscope.ai

4. Trackerly.ai

A solid option if you want reporting.

Features include:

• Historical AI mentions
• Citation tracking
• Competitor comparisons
• APIs
• Custom dashboards
• Scheduled reports

Useful if you're reporting AI visibility to stakeholders. trackerly.ai

5. Bourd

Interesting for technical teams because it supports:

• Scheduled scans (weekly/monthly/custom)
• Citation counts over time
• Per-model history
• Per-prompt trends
• API access

It emphasizes longitudinal tracking rather than snapshots. bourd.dev

If you already use an SEO suite

You may not need a dedicated platform:

• Ahrefs Brand Radar provides historical AI visibility and citation tracking integrated with the rest of Ahrefs.
• Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit adds AI mention and citation reporting alongside traditional SEO metrics. www.reddit.com

My recommendation by use case

One important note: because AI responses vary from run to run, the most reliable platforms repeatedly execute the same prompt sets over time and aggregate the results, rather than relying on single snapshots. Recent GEO research suggests repeated measurements provide a much more accurate picture of AI visibility trends than one-off checks. arxiv.org

If your primary goal is tracking how often your domain is cited by AI assistants over time (rather than traditional SEO rankings), there are now several platforms built specifically for this.

Here's how I'd rank them:

If historical trendlines are your priority

I'd focus on one of these:

1. CitationLab AI Monitor (my top recommendation)

It tracks:

• visibility over time
• citation share
• mention share
• competitors
• which sources the models cite
• daily historical graphs

It also compares performance across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews rather than treating them as one metric. citationlab.ai

2. Scrunch

Probably the strongest option if you want to answer questions like:

• Which pages on my site get cited?
• Which prompts generated those citations?
• Did citations increase compared with last month?
• Which competitors replaced me?

It keeps historical prompt-level citation data instead of only aggregate scores. scrunch.com

3. CiteWatch

Designed around AI visibility metrics:

• historical citation counts
• AI Visibility Score
• Share of Voice
• AI assistant comparison
• citation context

Good if you're specifically measuring GEO/AEO performance. cite.watch

If you run SEO for a larger company

If you already use enterprise SEO tools:

• Nightwatch now includes AI citation tracking alongside keyword rankings. nightwatch.io
• Other enterprise platforms have also added AI visibility features, but they're generally best if you're already invested in their ecosystems. www.techradar.com

One thing to keep in mind

AI citations are inherently volatile. Studies and practitioner experience suggest that the same prompt can produce different cited sources over time, especially in conversational AI systems. The most useful platforms therefore run the same prompt sets repeatedly and report trends (such as frequency of citation and share of voice) rather than relying on one-off checks. www.reddit.com

If you're managing one domain and want the best balance of features and usability, I'd start with CitationLab or Scrunch. If you're an agency monitoring many brands, Scrunch or Nightwatch are stronger choices due to their more advanced reporting and competitive analysis.