ChatGPT answers, unedited

If your priority is agency workflow + multiple clients + AI share-of-voice tracking + polished reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My practical shortlist

1. Peec AI — probably the first demo I'd take

Peec is unusually explicit about the agency use case: one account can contain separate client workspaces, with unlimited client/team seats, automated reporting, share-of-voice tracking, competitor comparisons, CSV/API exports, and Looker Studio dashboards. Its agency plans currently start at $245/month for 3 clients, with higher tiers for additional clients. Peec AI Peec AI

The particularly useful part for an agency is the reporting workflow: Peec says its MCP can loop through client projects, compare visibility/SOV with the prior period, generate summaries, and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

peec.ai

2. Profound — if your clients are enterprise

Profound is more oriented toward deep enterprise analytics and broad answer-engine coverage. I'd look at it if you're selling sophisticated GEO/AEO reporting to large brands rather than simply needing an efficient reporting machine for 20 SMB clients. Current comparisons put its entry plans substantially below Enterprise but with considerably more limited engine coverage. Baarely

tryprofound.com

3. Promptwatch — worth a demo if you want reports plus action

Promptwatch is interesting if you don't want the product to stop at "your SOV went from 14% to 18%." Its positioning combines prompt tracking, citations/crawling and optimization/content workflows. Current agency-oriented offerings advertise multi-project support and automated reporting. AI Search Tools Best GEO Software

What I'd choose based on agency size

• 5–15 clients: Peec or Otterly
• 15–50+ clients: Peec is particularly interesting because of its client-workspace and reporting architecture.
• Enterprise SEO/GEO consultancy: Profound
• You want to turn visibility data into actual optimization work: Promptwatch
• You mainly need inexpensive monitoring: Otterly

One thing I'd specifically test in demos: don't just ask whether they have "reports." Ask to see the actual PDF/Slides/QBR output generated for one client, then ask how long it takes to produce the same report for 20 clients. That's where agency tools differ substantially.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 30, 100) and whether you want PDF reports, live white-label dashboards, or automated Google Slides, I can narrow this to 2–3 and compare their current agency pricing/features.

The particularly useful part for an agency is the reporting workflow: Peec says its MCP can loop through client projects, compare visibility/SOV with the prior period, generate summaries, and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

peec.ai

2. Profound — if your clients are enterprise

Profound is more oriented toward deep enterprise analytics and broad answer-engine coverage. I'd look at it if you're selling sophisticated GEO/AEO reporting to large brands rather than simply needing an efficient reporting machine for 20 SMB clients. Current comparisons put its entry plans substantially below Enterprise but with considerably more limited engine coverage. baarely.com

tryprofound.com

3. Promptwatch — worth a demo if you want reports plus action

If your priorities are multiple clients + AI share of voice + polished, client-facing exports, I’d shortlist these:

My take

For a typical SEO/content agency, I'd start with Zumi, Citenzo, and Cliro. Their positioning is particularly aligned with the workflow you described: isolate each client, track competitors and AI visibility, then produce something you can actually hand to the client. Zumi specifically advertises separate client workspaces, agency-branded exports, and up to nine AI engines. Zumi

Citenzo is particularly interesting if the report itself is the product. Its agency plan currently advertises up to 30 client brands, six AI engines, share-of-voice/gap analysis, and white-label reports with your logo and domain. Citenzo

Cliro is worth looking at if you hate report assembly. It supports scheduled reports, white-label branding, PDF/CSV export, share-of-voice reporting, citations, and one report per client. Cliro

Citaim is a good smaller-agency option if five client projects is enough: it explicitly offers per-client workspaces and white-label PDFs containing SOV, trends, competitor comparisons, and cited sources. Citaim

One thing I'd prioritize

Don't choose based purely on the number of AI engines. For agency use, I'd test whether the platform can produce this without manual spreadsheet work:

Client → tracked buyer prompts → AI visibility → share of voice vs. competitors → citations/sources → month-over-month movement → branded PDF

That's the workflow that turns AI visibility tracking into a repeatable agency deliverable.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 100+) and whether you need Looker Studio/GA4 integration, I can narrow this to the 2–3 most suitable options and compare current pricing.

If your priority is multi-client AI share of voice + polished, client-facing reporting, I’d shortlist these:

The three I'd demo first

1. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — particularly compelling if you already use AgencyAnalytics for SEO/PPC/social reporting. AI visibility sits alongside the rest of the client's performance data rather than creating another reporting ecosystem. It explicitly tracks share of voice and competitor visibility and produces client-ready reports. AgencyAnalytics

2. Promptwatch — worth looking at if your agency needs API/Data Studio connectivity as well as client dashboards. It supports multi-client management, white-label dashboards, client portals, and integrations. Promptwatch

3. Zumi — especially interesting for your specific "export polished reports" requirement. It offers agency-branded PDF and CSV exports, isolated client workspaces, SOV/mention-rate reporting, and coverage of up to nine AI engines. Zumi

One important distinction

I'd separate "AI visibility tracker" from "GEO execution platform."

If you mainly need to answer:

"How much of the AI conversation does Client X own, versus Competitors A/B/C, and can I put that into a beautiful monthly report?"

then AgencyAnalytics, Zumi, Promptwatch, Tower GEO, or Citenzo are the relevant category.

If you also want the software to tell your team what content/citations to change to increase visibility, look harder at GetIntel or similar execution-oriented platforms. GetIntel, for example, combines SOV tracking with drafted fixes and has a Looker Studio connector. GetIntel

My practical buying checklist: make sure the platform supports custom prompts per client, competitor tracking, historical SOV, engine-by-engine breakdowns, citation/source tracking, scheduled refreshes, white-label PDF, CSV/API export, and separate client workspaces. Those features matter much more for an agency than a flashy overall "AI visibility score."

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you use Looker Studio/AgencyAnalytics, I can narrow this to 2–3 and compare their current pricing and agency limits.

For an agency managing multiple clients, I’d prioritize four things:

1. Multi-client workspaces (separate brands, competitors, prompts)
2. AI share-of-voice metrics (not just “mentions”)
3. White-label / polished exports (PDF, dashboards, client links)
4. Repeatable monthly reporting workflows

Here are the strongest options right now:

AgencyAnalytics Omnia Semrush## My shortlist by agency type

Best overall for a traditional marketing agency

AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker
Best if you already send monthly client reports. It puts AI visibility alongside SEO, paid, and analytics metrics instead of creating another dashboard clients must learn. It supports AI visibility tracking across major AI engines and folds metrics into agency-style reporting workflows. AgencyAnalytics

Best if AI visibility is becoming a standalone service

Omnia
Strong choice for agencies offering “AI search optimization” retainers. It emphasizes share of voice, prompt-level tracking, citation sources, competitive gaps, and exports for dashboards/reporting. Omnia

Best for polished client-facing deliverables

Citenzo
Good if your priority is “send a beautiful report every month.” It focuses on white-label reports, AI visibility scores, competitor share of voice, and agency-branded reporting. Citenzo

Best lightweight reporting tool

AISoV
Useful if you mainly need repeatable client reports: define prompts, compare competitors, export/share reports, and avoid building decks manually. AISoV

Best for enterprise clients

Scrunch AI
Better suited when clients expect deeper analysis, APIs, custom reporting, and broader AI search intelligence. Semrush

What I would avoid

• Tools that only show AI mentions without competitor benchmarking
• Tools without saved prompt sets (you’ll rebuild reports every month)
• Tools without citation/source analysis (clients will ask “why did this happen?”)
• Tools without white-label exports if reporting is part of your retainer

A practical agency stack

For a 5–50 client agency:

• Reporting backbone: AgencyAnalytics
• AI visibility layer: Omnia or AISoV
• Premium GEO service offering: add Scrunch or Citenzo-style white-label reporting

For a pure AI-search/GEO agency, I’d lean toward Omnia or Citenzo. For an SEO agency adding AI visibility as a new reporting section, AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker is probably the cleanest fit. AgencyAnalytics Omnia Citenzo

I’d also evaluate whether the tool tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, because “AI share of voice” is increasingly fragmented across engines. AgencyAnalytics Omnia

For an agency managing multiple clients, I’d prioritize tools that have:

• multi-brand/client workspaces
• AI share of voice (SOV) benchmarking vs competitors
• prompt tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc.
• scheduled client reports
• white-label exports or share links
• citation/source tracking (so you can explain why a brand appears)

Here are the strongest options I’d shortlist:

My picks by agency type

1. SEO/content agency adding AI visibility as a new service

Pick:

• AgencyAnalytics if you already report SEO metrics there. AgencyAnalytics
• Omnia if you want GEO recommendations alongside reporting. Omnia

2. PR/brand agency selling “AI reputation” monitoring

Pick:

• Chatobserver or AISoV for cleaner executive-facing reports. Chatobserver AISoV

3. Agency with 20–100+ clients

Look hardest at:

• AgencyAnalytics
• Peec AI
• Scrunch AI

The key question is whether pricing scales by client/project, tracked prompts, or AI queries—that can make a huge difference at agency volume. AI Visibility Software

Features I would not compromise on

For a serious agency offering, I’d require:

• Competitor SOV: “Client appears in 34% of category prompts vs competitor at 52%”
• Citation breakdown: which websites/content sources AI engines rely on
• Prompt libraries: reusable prompt sets by industry/client
• Monthly PDF/HTML exports
• White-label branding
• Historical trends: not just a one-time score
• Evidence screenshots or answer capture: clients will ask “where did this come from?”

My overall shortlist:

1. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — best if you need polished recurring client reporting.
2. AISoV — best dedicated AI share-of-voice reporting workflow.
3. Omnia — best for agencies combining GEO strategy + measurement.
4. Chatobserver — best for executive-friendly AI reputation reports.

AgencyAnalytics AISoV Omnia ChatobserverIf you tell me your agency size (e.g., 5 clients vs 200 clients), typical client type (SEO, PR, paid, SaaS, local), and whether you need white-label PDFs, I can narrow this to a top 2–3.

If your priority is agency-scale AI share of voice + multiple clients + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these three:

1. peec.ai — my pick for most agencies

Peec is particularly agency-oriented: one account can manage isolated client workspaces, with unlimited client/team seats. It tracks visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. Peec AI Peec AI

The reporting workflow is unusually good: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards, give clients login-free read-only links, export CSV, and use its MCP/agent layer to automate recurring reports and even compile client summaries into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI Peec AI

Why I'd choose it: if you're selling "AI visibility reporting" as a recurring agency deliverable, Peec seems closest to an end-to-end client → dashboard → report → renewal workflow.

2. tryprofound.com — best for sophisticated AEO teams

Profound is stronger if you want the reporting to sit alongside a deeper AEO/AI-search strategy platform. Its dashboards can track Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, with filters for topics, tags, platforms, regions and personas. Reports can be shared via public links or exported as PDFs. Profound

I'd lean Profound for a larger agency where the pitch is less "here's your monthly AI score" and more "we run your entire AEO program."

3. otterly.ai — best if exports/reporting are paramount

Otterly is compelling for agencies because it supports separate workspaces per client and automatically refreshed reports. It can export PDF and CSV reports, while raw AI responses can also be exported as CSV/JSON. Otterly AI Otterly AI

Its Looker Studio connector is especially useful: you can build your own agency-branded dashboard and schedule delivery to clients. Otterly AI Otterly AI

One caveat: Otterly doesn't currently have native white-labeling of its own interface; the recommended agency workaround is Looker Studio. Otterly AI

My ranking for your specific use case

If I were choosing today:

1. Peec AI — best combination of multi-client management, SOV metrics, automation and agency reporting.
2. Profound — best if enterprise-grade AEO intelligence matters more than simple reporting.
3. OtterlyAI — best if you want lots of export options and already use Looker Studio.

One important distinction: don't evaluate these merely on whether they say they track "AI visibility." For an agency, I'd specifically test client isolation, competitor SOV, historical trends, citation/source reporting, branded dashboards, PDF/deck export, scheduled delivery, API/CSV access, and per-client economics. Those are what determine whether the tool actually saves your account managers time.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200), I can narrow this down to the best 1–2 and compare current agency pricing + cost per client + reporting/export limits.

Why I'd choose it: if you're selling "AI visibility reporting" as a recurring agency deliverable, Peec seems closest to an end-to-end client → dashboard → report → renewal workflow.

2. tryprofound.com — best for sophisticated AEO teams

Profound is stronger if you want the reporting to sit alongside a deeper AEO/AI-search strategy platform. Its dashboards can track Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, with filters for topics, tags, platforms, regions and personas. Reports can be shared via public links or exported as PDFs. tryprofound.com

I'd lean Profound for a larger agency where the pitch is less "here's your monthly AI score" and more "we run your entire AEO program."

3. otterly.ai — best if exports/reporting are paramount

Otterly is compelling for agencies because it supports separate workspaces per client and automatically refreshed reports. It can export PDF and CSV reports, while raw AI responses can also be exported as CSV/JSON. help.otterly.ai help.otterly.ai

Its Looker Studio connector is especially useful: you can build your own agency-branded dashboard and schedule delivery to clients.

If your priority is agency workflow + multi-client AI share-of-voice tracking + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

For a typical SEO/content/PR agency managing, say, 10–50 client brands, I'd start with Peec.

It is particularly well suited to the agency use case because it treats clients/projects as distinct entities and has agency-oriented reporting, CSV/export workflows and a Looker Studio connector. Its multilingual coverage is also unusually strong. The Rank Masters AI Search Tools

For your specific requirement—"AI share of voice across multiple clients and export polished reports"—I'd rank the capabilities:

1. Peec — best overall agency reporting workflow
2. RankPrompt — best if white-label presentation is paramount
3. Otterly — best price/ease-of-deployment combination
4. Profound — best for sophisticated enterprise clients
5. Promptwatch — best if reporting needs to lead directly into optimization

What I'd actually evaluate in demos

Don't just ask whether they "track AI visibility." Ask them to demonstrate this exact workflow:

Create 20 client workspaces → track each client's brand + 5–10 competitors → calculate share of voice → show movement month-over-month → identify which AI engines/prompts drove the change → generate a branded PDF/report → schedule it to the client.

That's where the differences become obvious. Agency comparisons consistently flag client separation, multi-brand management, white-labeling, exports and automated reporting as the important requirements—not simply the number of AI engines monitored. The Rank Masters Rank Prompt

One other consideration: don't define SOV as just "percentage of prompts where the brand appeared." The stronger platforms can also show position/ranking, sentiment, competitor share, citations/sources, prompt-level results and changes over time. That's much more defensible in a client report.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 100+) and whether you need true white-label PDFs/dashboard links, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare current pricing.

If your priority is one agency workspace → many clients → AI share-of-voice tracking → polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 Peec AI is the one I'd test first

Peec is unusually well aligned with your exact workflow. Its agency product lets you manage multiple client projects from one account, benchmark competitors, track mention rate, position, citations, sentiment and share of voice, and monitor multiple AI surfaces including ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot. Peec AI Peec AI

The reporting side is particularly compelling: you can push data into Looker Studio, export CSV/API data, and use its MCP integration to automatically generate weekly client summaries and compile them into a Google Slides deck with one slide per client. Peec AI Peec AI

Current published agency pricing is roughly:

• Essential: $245/mo — 3 clients
• Growth: $495/mo — 5 clients
• Scale: $795/mo — 7 clients
• Comprehensive: custom

Peec's own published pricing/feature page currently lists those tiers and capacities. Peec AI

When I'd choose the others

Profound — choose this if your clients are large enterprises and the depth of AI-search intelligence matters more than agency-friendly economics. It has particularly strong citation/source analysis and enterprise workflows, but it is much more of an enterprise purchase. Profound Reachroller

Otterly — attractive if you're testing AI visibility reporting across a small roster and want to keep costs down. It starts around $29/month, but you'll hit limitations much sooner once you're tracking substantial prompt sets across multiple clients. AEO Labs Reachroller

Scrunch — I'd put this on an enterprise-agency shortlist, particularly if you need sophisticated multi-brand/workspace management and governance. Loudmink

SE Ranking — particularly interesting if you're already selling traditional SEO reporting. It gives you AI visibility alongside the conventional SEO stack rather than creating another completely separate reporting platform. AI Visibility Software

My recommendation by agency size

• 5–10 clients: Peec
• 10–50 clients: Peec, then evaluate enterprise Scrunch/Profound
• 50+ enterprise brands: Profound or Scrunch
• Just adding AI visibility as a new service: Otterly
• Already heavily invested in SEO tooling: SE Ranking

One important distinction: don't optimize for "number of AI engines." For agency reporting, I'd prioritize consistent prompt methodology + competitive share of voice + citation tracking + client separation + branded/automated reporting. A beautiful report based on unstable or incomparable prompts is worse than a simpler report with defensible methodology.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 30, 100) and whether you want white-label PDFs/PowerPoints vs live dashboards, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and compare their actual agency pricing/capacity.

If your priority is agency use: multiple clients + AI share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

Current 2026 comparisons consistently put Peec, Otterly, Profound and Scrunch among the leading agency-oriented platforms. AI Visibility Software DeepSmith

🥇 I'd start with Peec AI

For an agency managing, say, 10–30 client brands, Peec looks like the strongest balance of:

• AI share-of-voice / share-of-answer tracking
• Competitor comparisons
• Multiple projects/brands
• Prompt-level visibility
• Exportable data
• Looker Studio integration
• API-friendly reporting workflows

That last part matters: if you already have a reporting stack, you can make the AI visibility data look like the rest of your monthly SEO/client report rather than sending clients to another dashboard. Recent agency-focused comparisons specifically call out Peec's CSV, Looker Studio and API capabilities. The Rank Masters The Rank Masters

peec.ai

🥈 Otterly if you want inexpensive + easy

I'd choose Otterly.AI if you're selling AI visibility as an add-on to existing SEO/marketing retainers and don't want a large software bill.

Its big advantage is agency-friendly economics and straightforward monitoring/reporting. Current comparisons put its entry pricing around $29/month, although agency/reporting requirements can push the actual cost higher. AI Visibility Software DeepSmith

otterly.ai

🥇 Profound for high-value clients

If your clients are enterprise brands, I'd look seriously at Profound. It goes deeper into why a brand is appearing in AI answers—citations, answer content, competitors, and what AI engines are saying—rather than simply giving you a visibility score.

The tradeoff is that it's more enterprise-oriented and can be considerably more expensive. Bloomiro Profound

tryprofound.com

One sleeper: Baarely

If by "polished reports" you literally mean a beautiful PDF you can slap your agency logo on and send to the client, Baarely deserves a demo.

Its agency offering reportedly includes white-label PDF and HTML reports, whereas Otterly tends to push agencies toward Looker Studio for white-label reporting. Baarely

My ranking for an agency

1. Peec AI — best overall balance
2. Otterly.AI — best if cost and simplicity matter
3. Profound — best for sophisticated enterprise reporting
4. Baarely — best specifically for beautiful native white-label reports
5. Scrunch AI — worth considering for larger/enterprise agency operations

One important distinction: don't evaluate these purely on the "AI visibility score." For client reporting, I'd want the platform to show share of voice by prompt category, competitor SOV, citation/source distribution, trend over time, and the actual answers where the client appears/disappears. Otherwise you're essentially selling clients a vanity metric. Current agency reporting guides make the same distinction between monitoring and genuinely useful client-ready reporting. The Rank Masters

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need white-label PDFs vs. Looker Studio dashboards, I can narrow this to the 2 best options and compare actual agency pricing.

otterly.ai

🥇 Profound for high-value clients

If your clients are enterprise brands, I'd look seriously at Profound. It goes deeper into why a brand is appearing in AI answers—citations, answer content, competitors, and what AI engines are saying—rather than simply giving you a visibility score.

The tradeoff is that it's more enterprise-oriented and can be considerably more expensive. bloomiro.com tryprofound.com

For an agency managing multiple clients and needing AI share-of-voice (SoV) tracking + polished client reports, I’d prioritize tools that have:

• Multi-brand/client workspaces
• Competitor benchmarking
• Prompt-level evidence (not just a score)
• White-label PDFs or dashboards
• Scheduled reporting
• Export options for QBRs/monthly retainers

Here are the strongest options I’d shortlist:

My picks by agency type

Small SEO/content agency (5–30 clients)

Best fit: AgencyScope, Peec AI, Otterly.AI
You probably want speed and clean reporting more than enterprise analytics. AgencyScope stands out if your deliverable is a monthly PDF clients can understand. AgencyScope

Established SEO/GEO agency (30–200 clients)

Best fit: Peec AI, Indaeo, SE Ranking
Look for:

• reusable client templates
• bulk client management
• consistent scoring methodology
• API/export options

AI Visibility Software Indaeo### Enterprise clients / high-ticket retainers

Best fit: Scrunch AI, Profound, enterprise AI visibility platforms
These tend to emphasize deeper competitive intelligence, governance, and larger-scale monitoring. AI Visibility Software

Features I would not compromise on

For selling AI visibility as a service, the report should show:

• AI Share of Voice: “Brand appeared in 42% of relevant prompts vs competitor A at 67%”
• Prompt examples: the exact questions where the client wins/loses
• Citation sources: which websites AI models rely on
• Competitor comparison
• Trend lines: month-over-month movement
• Executive summary: something an account manager can present in 5 minutes

A dashboard full of “AI visibility scores” without evidence is usually harder to justify to clients.

If I were choosing today

1. AgencyScope — best if your main output is polished monthly client PDFs. AgencyScope
2. Peec AI — best balance of agency scalability and AI visibility tracking. AI Visibility Software
3. Indaeo — best if you want a portfolio-style workspace across many brands. Indaeo
4. SE Ranking — best if AI visibility is an add-on to an existing SEO reporting stack. AI Visibility Software

If you tell me your approximate client count (e.g., 10, 50, 500+) and whether you need white-label PDFs vs live dashboards, I can narrow this to a top 2–3.

If your main requirement is agency-scale AI share of voice + multiple clients + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

1. peec.ai — my first choice

Peec looks particularly well matched to your use case. It tracks share of voice, visibility, sentiment, mentions and citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. Peec AI

The agency workflow is especially compelling: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards per client, export CSV/API data into BI systems, and its MCP workflow can automatically generate one-slide-per-client decks and summaries. Peec AI

Why I'd pick it: you can turn the raw AI visibility data into a repeatable monthly reporting product without manually rebuilding reports for every client.

2. otterly.ai — best budget option

Otterly is worth considering if you have a lot of smaller clients and don't want enterprise pricing. Current comparisons put its entry tier around $29/month, with multiple AI engines available and agency/partner workflows for multiple clients. Demand Local, Inc. DeepSmith

Its big advantage is getting an agency started cheaply; the tradeoff is that its reporting is more of a Looker Studio/template workflow than a beautifully finished native reporting product. DeepSmith

3. tryprofound.com — best for enterprise clients

I'd choose Profound when your clients are large brands and you're selling deep AI-search intelligence, not merely a monthly visibility score.

It goes considerably deeper into answer/citation analysis and can cover a broad set of AI engines at higher tiers. The downside is cost and packaging: it's much less attractive if you're trying to profitably monitor dozens of SMB clients. Baarely NXTG.AI

4. scrunchai.com — best for technical GEO

Scrunch is interesting if your agency wants to go beyond "your share of voice went from 14% → 21%" and explain why visibility changed, including citations, prompts and AI crawler/agent behavior. WorkDuo

It's more of a strategic/technical GEO platform than a pure reporting machine.

5. ayzeo.com — best for polished white-label PDFs

If by "polished reports" you specifically mean send a beautiful PDF to the client with your agency's branding, Ayzeo deserves a serious look.

Its current agency comparison highlights white-label PDF reports, unlimited seats, multi-client pricing and an optimization layer. Ayzeo Ayzeo

What I'd buy

For a typical SEO/content agency with 5–50 clients:

Peec AI → Looker Studio → automated monthly client report

That's probably the cleanest stack.

I'd structure each client report around:

• AI Share of Voice: % of relevant answers where the client appears
• Competitive SOV: client vs. 3–5 named competitors
• Visibility by engine: ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Google AI
• Average position
• Mention rate
• Citation rate
• Top pages being cited
• Lost/won prompts
• Change vs. previous month
• Top recommendations / next actions

That turns "AI visibility" from a novelty metric into something you can put directly into an SEO/GEO retainer report.

My ranking specifically for your requirements: Peec > Ayzeo > Otterly > Profound > Scrunch.

One caveat: the AI-visibility market is changing extremely quickly, and several vendors have changed agency pricing/features during 2026, so I'd verify the exact client/project limits before committing. koalr.ai Ayzeo

2. otterly.ai — best budget option

Otterly is worth considering if you have a lot of smaller clients and don't want enterprise pricing. Current comparisons put its entry tier around $29/month, with multiple AI engines available and agency/partner workflows for multiple clients. Demand Local, Inc. DeepSmith

Its big advantage is getting an agency started cheaply; the tradeoff is that its reporting is more of a Looker Studio/template workflow than a beautifully finished native reporting product. DeepSmith

3. tryprofound.com — best for enterprise clients

I'd choose Profound when your clients are large brands and you're selling deep AI-search intelligence, not merely a monthly visibility score.

It goes considerably deeper into answer/citation analysis and can cover a broad set of AI engines at higher tiers. The downside is cost and packaging: it's much less attractive if you're trying to profitably monitor dozens of SMB clients. Baarely NXTG.AI

4. scrunchai.com — best for technical GEO

Scrunch is interesting if your agency wants to go beyond "your share of voice went from 14% → 21%" and explain why visibility changed, including citations, prompts and AI crawler/agent behavior. WorkDuo

It's more of a strategic/technical GEO platform than a pure reporting machine.

5. ayzeo.com — best for polished white-label PDFs

If by "polished reports" you specifically mean send a beautiful PDF to the client with your agency's branding, Ayzeo deserves a serious look.

Its current agency comparison highlights white-label PDF reports, unlimited seats, multi-client pricing and an optimization layer. ayzeo.com ayzeo.com

What I'd buy

For a typical SEO/content agency with 5–50 clients:

If your priority is agency use + AI share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: OtterlyAI

For a typical agency managing, say, 10–50 client brands, I'd start with OtterlyAI.

It specifically tracks share of voice, brand mentions, sentiment, competitors and citations across AI search engines, and supports PDF/CSV exports, API access and a Looker Studio connector. That makes it unusually well suited to turning raw AI-search data into something a client can actually consume. Otterly The Rank Masters

Its reporting workflow is particularly attractive if you want something like:

Client: Acme
AI Share of Voice: 18.4% ↑ 4.2 pts
Competitor A: 31.7%
Competitor B: 24.1%

Where we're winning: 14 prompts
Where competitors win: 27 prompts
Top citation gaps: 8
Recommended actions: 5

That is much more useful in a monthly retainer report than simply dumping ChatGPT screenshots on a client.

🥈 Peec AI — best if reporting/dashboarding is the priority

Peec AI is probably my second choice, particularly if your agency already builds reports in Looker Studio.

Current comparisons consistently highlight Peec's agency/multi-brand workflow, clean dashboards, CSV exports, API capabilities and Looker Studio integration. The Rank Masters Bloomiro

I'd choose Peec over Otterly if your agency has analysts who want to manipulate the data and build a highly customized reporting layer.

🥉 Profound — if your clients are big enterprises

Profound is the one I'd investigate for large SaaS, enterprise or Fortune 500 accounts.

Its differentiator is depth: answer-level analysis, citations, competitive intelligence and particularly prompt-volume/demand data. Current agency comparisons put it toward the enterprise end of the market. Profound DeepSmith

The tradeoff is that it can be overkill if you're primarily trying to produce attractive monthly reports for 20 SMB/mid-market clients.

What I'd actually buy

Small/mid-size agency:
OtterlyAI → Looker Studio → your branded client report

Data-heavy SEO/AEO agency:
Peec AI → Looker Studio

Enterprise AEO consultancy:
Profound

Agency that wants monitoring + recommendations/content execution:
Look at RocketBlue, AthenaHQ or Scrunch rather than buying a pure monitoring platform. Prism News Baarely

One important distinction: don't evaluate these purely on "AI visibility score." For client reporting, I'd require share of voice + competitor share + prompt-level results + citations + historical trends + export/API + separate client workspaces. Those give you a defensible story about why a client's visibility changed rather than just another proprietary score.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you use Looker Studio, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare their agency pricing/features.

If your agency needs AI share of voice across many clients + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

For a typical SEO/digital agency managing, say, 10–50 clients, Peec is probably the strongest fit right now.

It gives you separate client workspaces, unlimited team seats, daily tracking, competitor benchmarking, and share-of-voice/visibility metrics across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot. Peec AI

The reporting workflow is particularly agency-friendly: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards, export CSV, use the API, and automate recurring reports. Peec even documents a workflow that loops through client accounts, summarizes week-over-week SOV changes, and compiles the results into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI Peec AI

Current agency pricing listed by Peec is roughly $245/mo for 3 clients, $495/mo for 5, and $795/mo for 7, with a custom tier above that. Peec AI

When I'd choose the others

• Otterly — if you're onboarding lots of smaller clients and need inexpensive monitoring. It's substantially cheaper to start, but its native white-label reporting is less developed; branded reporting is commonly done through Looker Studio. Baarely
• Profound — if your clients are enterprise brands and you need deeper analysis of why they're appearing in AI answers, citation intelligence, and sophisticated prompt/answer data. It's more powerful but generally a heavier enterprise purchase. AnswerManiac
• RocketBlue — interesting if you want to go beyond reporting into identifying citation gaps and actually improving AI visibility, while retaining white-label exports and API access. Prism News
• Scrunch — worth considering for a larger agency that wants AI visibility monitoring combined with its broader agent/GEO optimization capabilities. Baarely

Bottom line: For your specific wording — multiple clients + AI share of voice + polished reports — I'd start with Peec, then demo Profound if your clients are enterprise, and Otterly if price/client volume is the dominant consideration.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 100+) and whether reports need to be fully white-labeled, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare actual cost per client + reporting workflow.

The reporting workflow is particularly agency-friendly: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards, export CSV, use the API, and automate recurring reports. Peec even documents a workflow that loops through client accounts, summarizes week-over-week SOV changes, and compiles the results into a Google Slides deck.

If you mean AI/GEO share of voice—how often a client is mentioned/recommended in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.—I’d shortlist these for an agency:

1. Peec AI — my pick for most agencies

Peec is unusually well aligned with the “one agency, many clients” model. It supports centralized client projects, unlimited client seats, branded dashboards, CSV/API exports, Looker Studio, and automated reporting workflows. It tracks visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice across six AI channels. Peec AI Peec AI

The particularly compelling part is its reporting automation: Peec says its MCP workflow can loop through clients, compare week-over-week SOV/visibility, generate summaries, and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

Choose it if: you want to turn AI visibility into a repeatable monthly/weekly agency deliverable without a lot of spreadsheet work.

2. Profound — best if clients are enterprise

tryprofound.com are probably the strongest option if the presentation itself matters.

You can build dashboards around Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, filter by platform/topic/region/persona, then share public dashboards or export PDFs. Profound

Profound also has centralized client management specifically for agencies and tracks a broad set of answer engines, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Copilot and Google AI Overviews. Profound

Choose it if: you're selling a sophisticated AEO/GEO service to larger clients and want something that feels enterprise-grade.

3. OtterlyAI — best straightforward reporting stack

Otterly is attractive if your main requirement is:

Track → benchmark → export → send client report.

It provides PDF/CSV exports, daily-updating reports, separate workspaces for clients, and a Looker Studio connector for customized/white-labeled dashboards and scheduled delivery. OtterlyAI OtterlyAI

One caveat: Otterly doesn't have native white-labeling of its own interface; the recommended workaround is Looker Studio. OtterlyAI

Choose it if: you want something relatively simple that your account managers can operate without becoming GEO analysts.

My ranking for your specific use case

If the requirements are multiple clients + AI SOV + polished client reports, I'd rank them:

1. 🥇 Peec AI — best balance of agency management, SOV data, automation and exports
2. 🥈 Profound — best high-end/enterprise reporting and analytics
3. 🥉 OtterlyAI — easiest route to clean recurring client reports
4. Scrunch — strong competitive/citation analysis
5. Semrush — compelling if your agency already lives in Semrush

One important distinction: don't just compare “AI visibility score.” For agency reporting, I'd insist on share of voice, competitor SOV, mention rate, average position, citation share, sentiment, prompt-level results, historical trends, and export/API access. Otherwise you're essentially giving clients another vanity metric.

If I were building an agency's reporting stack today, I'd demo Peec and Profound side-by-side first. Their approaches are substantially more suited to turning AI visibility into a recurring client service than a tool that merely gives you a monthly AI score. Peec AI Profound

Choose it if: you want to turn AI visibility into a repeatable monthly/weekly agency deliverable without a lot of spreadsheet work.

2. Profound — best if clients are enterprise

tryprofound.com are probably the strongest option if the presentation itself matters.

You can build dashboards around Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, filter by platform/topic/region/persona, then share public dashboards or export PDFs. Profound

Profound also has centralized client management specifically for agencies and tracks a broad set of answer engines, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Copilot and Google AI Overviews. Profound

Choose it if: you're selling a sophisticated AEO/GEO service to larger clients and want something that feels enterprise-grade.

3. OtterlyAI — best straightforward reporting stack

Otterly is attractive if your main requirement is:

Track → benchmark → export → send client report.

It provides PDF/CSV exports, daily-updating reports, separate workspaces for clients, and a Looker Studio connector for customized/white-labeled dashboards and scheduled delivery. help.otterly.ai help.otterly.ai

One caveat: Otterly doesn't have native white-labeling of its own interface; the recommended workaround is Looker Studio. help.otterly.ai

Choose it if: you want something relatively simple that your account managers can operate without becoming GEO analysts.

My ranking for your specific use case

If the requirements are multiple clients + AI SOV + polished client reports, I'd rank them:

If you’re an agency managing multiple clients, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

peec.ai

For the exact use case you described, Peec is probably the strongest fit. It gives you isolated client workspaces under one account, competitor benchmarking, share of voice, sentiment and citation metrics, plus daily tracking across six major AI channels. Peec AI

The reporting workflow is particularly attractive: Peec supports branded Looker Studio dashboards, CSV/API exports, and its MCP layer can automatically generate client summaries and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

Why I'd choose it: you can turn AI SOV into a repeatable monthly/QBR deliverable rather than having strategists manually assemble screenshots.

🥈 Profound — best for sophisticated clients

tryprofound.com

If your clients are larger brands and want deep analysis rather than just a visibility score, Profound is compelling. Its dashboards specifically support Share of Voice, visibility, average position and citation rank, with filters for topics, platforms, regions and personas. PDF exports and public dashboard links are built in. Profound

I'd lean Profound when your agency sells strategic AI-search intelligence at a premium.

🥉 OtterlyAI — best value / easiest starting point

otterly.ai

Otterly is attractive if you have a growing roster and don't want enterprise software overhead. Its agency setup supports unlimited workspaces, with separate client brands, prompts and reports. Otterly

One important caveat: native white-labeling is somewhat nuanced. Otterly's own documentation says its interface/URLs aren't natively white-labeled; the recommended route for branded client reporting is Looker Studio. Otterly AI Otterly AI

Conductor — best if you're already an SEO agency

conductor.com

Conductor makes sense if you want SEO + AEO in one enterprise platform. It tracks AI visibility, mentions, citations, competition and SOV while connecting those insights to traditional search and website performance. Conductor Conductor

It's probably overkill if all you want is a clean monthly AI-visibility report.

Rankfender — reporting-first wildcard

rankfender.com

This is worth a look if the report itself is the product. It offers white-label PDF reports, scheduled delivery, client portals, competitive SOV, per-AI-engine breakdowns, KPI trends, GSC/GA4 integration and report-template cloning. RankFender

What I'd buy

• 5–50 clients: Peec AI
• Enterprise / sophisticated strategy clients: Profound
• Cost-conscious agency scaling quickly: OtterlyAI
• Existing enterprise SEO stack: Conductor
• You want automated, beautiful PDFs/QBRs above all else: Rankfender

One thing I'd not optimize for is simply the number of AI engines. For agency reporting, I'd prioritize consistent methodology + competitor SOV + citation/source analysis + historical trends + automated branded output. Those are what make the metric defensible in front of a client.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want PDF/PowerPoint/Looker Studio, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their current pricing.

The reporting workflow is particularly attractive: Peec supports branded Looker Studio dashboards, CSV/API exports, and its MCP layer can automatically generate client summaries and compile them into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI

Why I'd choose it: you can turn AI SOV into a repeatable monthly/QBR deliverable rather than having strategists manually assemble screenshots.

🥈 Profound — best for sophisticated clients

tryprofound.com

If your clients are larger brands and want deep analysis rather than just a visibility score, Profound is compelling. Its dashboards specifically support Share of Voice, visibility, average position and citation rank, with filters for topics, platforms, regions and personas. PDF exports and public dashboard links are built in. Profound

I'd lean Profound when your agency sells strategic AI-search intelligence at a premium.

🥉 OtterlyAI — best value / easiest starting point

otterly.ai

Otterly is attractive if you have a growing roster and don't want enterprise software overhead. Its agency setup supports unlimited workspaces, with separate client brands, prompts and reports. Otterly

One important caveat: native white-labeling is somewhat nuanced. Otterly's own documentation says its interface/URLs aren't natively white-labeled; the recommended route for branded client reporting is Looker Studio. help.otterly.ai help.otterly.ai

Conductor — best if you're already an SEO agency

conductor.com

Conductor makes sense if you want SEO + AEO in one enterprise platform. It tracks AI visibility, mentions, citations, competition and SOV while connecting those insights to traditional search and website performance. conductor.com conductor.com

It's probably overkill if all you want is a clean monthly AI-visibility report.

Rankfender — reporting-first wildcard

If you’re an agency managing multiple clients and the deliverable is a polished monthly/quarterly “AI visibility / Share of Voice” report, I’d shortlist these:

Current 2026 comparisons consistently put Peec, Profound, Otterly, and Scrunch among the strongest agency options, while newer agency-focused products such as Ayzeo/Spotlight emphasize white-label reporting. Prism News Ayzeo DeepSmith

My recommendation

1. Peec AI — start here

For a typical SEO/digital agency, this is probably the sweet spot. It is designed around tracking visibility, competitors, prompts, and multiple brands rather than simply giving you a one-off AI audit. Agency plans support multiple projects/clients and reporting workflows. Baarely The Rank Masters

I'd choose it if your report needs to answer:

• “What percentage of AI answers mention our client?”
• “How do we compare with competitors?”
• “Which prompts are we winning/losing?”
• “Which sources are AI engines citing?”
• “Did visibility improve month over month?”

2. Profound — if your clients are sophisticated

Profound is the one I'd put in front of enterprise clients. It has particularly deep answer/citation analysis and broad engine coverage, but the economics and packaging make more sense when you're selling a substantial AI-search/GEO service rather than a $500/month add-on. Baarely AnswerManiac

3. Otterly — best low-cost way to get started

If you're building an AI visibility service and don't want to spend heavily initially, Otterly is compelling. Its entry pricing is low and it covers several major AI surfaces, with additional engines available at higher tiers. The catch: its native white-label capability is weaker; agencies commonly use its Looker Studio integration for branded reporting. Baarely DeepSmith

4. Ayzeo / Spotlight — if the PDF itself is the product

This is where I'd look if your biggest pain is “I need a beautiful report that I can send to the client without rebuilding it in Canva/Looker.” Ayzeo specifically advertises white-label PDF reports, while Spotlight is positioned around multi-brand dashboards and white-label exports. Ayzeo Prism News

What I'd prioritize for an agency

Don't choose based simply on “number of AI engines.” I'd score platforms on:

1. Client/workspace isolation — can 30 clients live cleanly in one account?
2. Share of Voice — actual competitor-relative SOV, not just a generic visibility score.
3. Prompt-level tracking — essential for explaining why SOV changed.
4. Citation/source analysis — tells your SEO team what sites/content are influencing the answers.
5. Historical data — preferably daily tracking so monthly reports aren't based on a few snapshots.
6. Automated reporting — scheduled PDF/email/dashboard delivery.
7. White-labeling — logo, colors, agency name, custom domain if possible.
8. Export/API/Looker Studio — critical if you already have an agency reporting stack.
9. Scalable pricing — avoid getting crushed when client count goes from 10 → 50.

Daily tracking and metrics such as citation rate, SOV, sentiment, and accuracy are increasingly becoming the important differentiators rather than simply “does it track ChatGPT?” Sapian Metrics

If I were choosing today:
Peec for the best all-around agency platform → Profound for enterprise → Otterly for economical scaling → Ayzeo/Spotlight if polished white-label reports are the primary requirement.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 30, 100+) and whether you need PDF, Looker Studio, or fully white-labeled dashboards, I can narrow this to the top 2–3 and compare actual agency pricing/features.

What I'd prioritize for an agency

If your priority is agency use + multiple clients + AI share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

For a typical agency managing, say, 10–30 client brands, Peec is probably the best balance of:

• Multi-client/project organization
• AI visibility/share-of-voice tracking
• Competitor comparisons
• Visibility/position/sentiment metrics
• Multiple AI engines
• Agency-oriented plans
• Reporting that can feed into Looker Studio

Recent comparisons consistently put Peec near the top for agencies, particularly when you want a scalable multi-brand workflow rather than an enterprise analytics platform. Koalr The Rank Masters Bloomiro

The catch: if "upload my logo → beautiful PDF → send to client" is non-negotiable, Peec isn't necessarily the cleanest option. Its strongest agency reporting route is more dashboard/Looker-oriented. Koalr NXTG

🥈 If polished reports are the #1 requirement: Baarely / RocketBlue

This is where I'd look beyond the usual Peec/Profound/Otterly trio.

Baarely specifically emphasizes agency white-label deliverables, including branded PDF and HTML reports. Its agency offering is aimed at agencies that want to turn AI visibility into a recurring client deliverable without buying an enterprise platform. Baarely

RocketBlue is another interesting agency-oriented option: it combines multi-brand dashboards, eight-engine coverage and white-label exports, according to a recent 2026 comparison. Prism News

For an agency where the report itself is part of what you're selling, I'd demo these before settling on Peec.

🥉 Profound if clients are enterprise

Profound is the one I'd choose when your clients care less about a pretty PDF and more about deep AI-search intelligence.

It goes considerably deeper into answer-engine data, citations, prompt volumes and what AI systems are actually saying about a brand. Its coverage can extend across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI experiences, Copilot, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and others depending on plan. Baarely Prism News

The downside is cost/packaging and the fact that it's more enterprise-oriented. It's arguably overkill for a local SEO agency selling a $500–$2,000/month GEO add-on.

Best cheap option: Otterly

Otterly.ai is attractive if you're trying to launch an AI-visibility service without a huge software bill.

It has multi-client agency workflows and broad AI-search coverage, while Looker Studio can handle the polished branded-report layer. Recent comparisons put its entry pricing around $29/month, though the useful agency configuration will cost more. Koalr Demand Local, Inc.

The tradeoff is that you may end up building/maintaining the reporting layer yourself.

What I'd actually buy

I'd narrow it to three demos:

1. Peec — if you want the best general-purpose agency platform.
2. Baarely or RocketBlue — if polished, white-label reports are a major part of your service.
3. Profound — if your clients are sophisticated/enterprise and demand deep data.

One important distinction: don't evaluate these just on "does it track AI mentions?" For an agency, I'd specifically test whether it can produce a report containing:

AI Share of Voice → Visibility trend → Competitor SOV → Mentions → Citation/share of cited sources → Sentiment → Winning/losing prompts → Recommended actions → Month-over-month change

That's the report structure that turns raw AI visibility data into something a client can understand and justify paying for.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to track (e.g. 10, 50, 100+) and your monthly software budget, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare their current agency pricing, client limits, engines, SOV methodology, API/export options, and white-label reporting.

🥉 Profound if clients are enterprise

Profound is the one I'd choose when your clients care less about a pretty PDF and more about deep AI-search intelligence.

It goes considerably deeper into answer-engine data, citations, prompt volumes and what AI systems are actually saying about a brand. Its coverage can extend across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI experiences, Copilot, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and others depending on plan. Baarely Prism News

The downside is cost/packaging and the fact that it's more enterprise-oriented. It's arguably overkill for a local SEO agency selling a $500–$2,000/month GEO add-on.

Best cheap option: Otterly

Otterly.ai is attractive if you're trying to launch an AI-visibility service without a huge software bill.

It has multi-client agency workflows and broad AI-search coverage, while Looker Studio can handle the polished branded-report layer. Recent comparisons put its entry pricing around $29/month, though the useful agency configuration will cost more.

If your priority is multi-client AI share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec

For an agency managing, say, 10–50 clients, Peec is probably the cleanest fit. It explicitly supports multiple isolated client workspaces, competitor benchmarking, automated reporting, branded dashboards, and exports/API connections. Its agency workflow also supports generating weekly summaries and client-specific reporting automatically. Peec AI

The important distinction is that you're not just tracking "did ChatGPT mention my client?" Peec tracks visibility/share of voice, sentiment, competitors, and the underlying AI answers/citations, which gives you material for an actual monthly strategy report. Peec AI

🥈 Otterly if margin matters

otterly.ai is attractive if you're going to put AI visibility tracking into every client's retainer and want the software cost per client to stay low.

It has broad engine coverage and an agency-oriented workflow, and third-party comparisons consistently position it as the lower-cost option versus Peec/Profound. Demand Local, Inc. MentionsAPI

🥉 Profound if the report needs to impress CMOs

tryprofound.com is the one I'd consider for larger clients where "why are we losing AI visibility?" matters more than simply producing a scorecard.

It goes considerably deeper into AI answer/citation analysis, so it lends itself to strategy work rather than just a recurring visibility dashboard. The tradeoff is that its packaging is more enterprise-oriented and can become expensive as you scale clients. The Rank Masters NeuralGen

One important caveat: "polished reports"

There's a difference between:

1. Native white-label PDF/report generation
2. Branded dashboards
3. Exporting data into Looker Studio and making your own beautiful report

A lot of these platforms advertise "agency reporting" but actually mean #2 or #3. Peec, for example, explicitly supports branded Looker Studio dashboards that clients can access without a Peec login, plus CSV/API access for BI systems. Peec AI

So if your goal is "click a button every month → beautiful PDF with our agency logo → send to client", I'd evaluate that workflow separately from the underlying SOV tracking.

My ranking for your exact use case:

• Peec — best balance of multi-client management, SOV analytics and reporting automation.
• Otterly — best if you have lots of smaller clients and care about software margin.
• Profound — best for high-value enterprise accounts and deeper strategic reporting.
• RocketBlue — worth a serious look if white-label exports and turning visibility gaps into actions are important.
• Conductor — compelling if you're already a Conductor/SEO-heavy agency.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 100+) and whether you need PDF reports, Looker Studio, or both, I can narrow this down to the 2–3 best options and compare current agency pricing, client limits, AI engines, SOV metrics, white-labeling, and export capabilities.

🥈 Otterly if margin matters

otterly.ai is attractive if you're going to put AI visibility tracking into every client's retainer and want the software cost per client to stay low.

It has broad engine coverage and an agency-oriented workflow, and third-party comparisons consistently position it as the lower-cost option versus Peec/Profound.

🥉 Profound if the report needs to impress CMOs

If your priority is an agency workflow—many clients, AI share of voice, competitive tracking, and polished client reporting—I’d shortlist these:

1. Peec AI — my pick for most agencies

Peec AI is particularly well aligned with what you're describing.

It has separate client workspaces, unlimited client/team seats, competitive benchmarking, share of voice, sentiment and citation tracking, and tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. Peec AI

The reporting workflow is unusually agency-friendly: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards, share them without requiring the client to log in, export CSV/API data, and automate weekly client summaries. Its MCP workflow can even compile multiple client reports into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI Peec AI

I'd choose Peec if: you have 10–100+ clients and want to standardize an AI-visibility reporting product without building a lot yourself.

2. Profound — best if you're selling premium AEO

Profound is the one I'd investigate if your agency wants the deepest data and a higher-end consulting proposition.

It has centralized client management specifically for agencies and tracks visibility, SOV, average position, citations and sentiment across major answer engines. Profound

Its custom dashboards are particularly good for client deliverables: you can configure the metrics/layout, then provide public links or PDF exports. Profound

I'd choose Profound if: clients are enterprise brands and you're charging substantial retainers for AEO/GEO strategy, not just reporting.

3. Scrunch — excellent SOV/citation analysis

Scrunch is worth a serious look if your core deliverable is "here's how your brand compares with competitors in AI."

It breaks SOV down by prompt, topic, platform, persona, funnel stage and geography, and also provides citation-level SOV. Scrunch

I'd choose Scrunch if: the strategy team wants to go deeper than a single visibility score and diagnose why a competitor is winning AI answers.

4. OtterlyAI — best if reporting integration matters

OtterlyAI tracks mentions, citations, sentiment and SOV across seven AI engines. Otterly

Its newly available API is especially interesting for agencies: you can push the data directly into Looker Studio, Tableau, Power BI, BigQuery, Snowflake, Zapier, Make or Slack, allowing you to build your own client-reporting layer. Otterly AI

I'd choose Otterly if: you already have a reporting stack and don't need the vendor's dashboard to be the final client-facing product.

My ranking for your specific use case

If I were evaluating these for an agency today:

1. 🥇 Peec AI — best combination of multi-client management + SOV + automated reporting
2. 🥈 Profound — strongest premium/enterprise platform
3. 🥉 Scrunch — excellent analytical depth
4. OtterlyAI — particularly compelling if you want to build your own reporting layer

One important distinction: don't evaluate these just on "AI visibility score." For agency reporting, I'd insist on SOV + competitor SOV + citations + actual answer examples + trend over time + prompt/topic segmentation + white-label/public reporting + API/export. AI visibility is changing quickly—recent changes in how ChatGPT cites Reddit, for example, show why engine/source-level tracking matters rather than relying on one aggregate score. Business Insider

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need PDF/PowerPoint reports vs. live white-label dashboards, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their current pricing/limits.

The reporting workflow is unusually agency-friendly: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards, share them without requiring the client to log in, export CSV/API data, and automate weekly client summaries. Its MCP workflow can even compile multiple client reports into a Google Slides deck. Peec AI Peec AI

I'd choose Peec if: you have 10–100+ clients and want to standardize an AI-visibility reporting product without building a lot yourself.

2. Profound — best if you're selling premium AEO

Profound is the one I'd investigate if your agency wants the deepest data and a higher-end consulting proposition.

It has centralized client management specifically for agencies and tracks visibility, SOV, average position, citations and sentiment across major answer engines. Profound

Its custom dashboards are particularly good for client deliverables: you can configure the metrics/layout, then provide public links or PDF exports. Profound

I'd choose Profound if: clients are enterprise brands and you're charging substantial retainers for AEO/GEO strategy, not just reporting.

3. Scrunch — excellent SOV/citation analysis

Scrunch is worth a serious look if your core deliverable is "here's how your brand compares with competitors in AI."

It breaks SOV down by prompt, topic, platform, persona, funnel stage and geography, and also provides citation-level SOV. Scrunch

I'd choose Scrunch if: the strategy team wants to go deeper than a single visibility score and diagnose why a competitor is winning AI answers.

4. OtterlyAI — best if reporting integration matters

OtterlyAI tracks mentions, citations, sentiment and SOV across seven AI engines. otterly.ai

Its newly available API is especially interesting for agencies: you can push the data directly into Looker Studio, Tableau, Power BI, BigQuery, Snowflake, Zapier, Make or Slack, allowing you to build your own client-reporting layer. help.otterly.ai

I'd choose Otterly if: you already have a reporting stack and don't need the vendor's dashboard to be the final client-facing product.

My ranking for your specific use case

If I were evaluating these for an agency today:

If your priority is agency-scale AI Share of Voice tracking + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

For an agency managing, say, 10–50 client brands, Peec is probably the one I'd evaluate first. It supports multiple client projects, lets you allocate tracking credits across brands/models, and reports things like AI visibility, Share of Voice, mentions, sentiment, rankings and citation sources. Semrush Bloomiro

The big advantage is that you're not just getting a generic "AI visibility score." You can show a client:

Your brand: 23% AI Share of Voice
Competitor A: 31%
Competitor B: 18%
Competitor C: 12%

…and then drill into which prompts caused the gap and which websites/models are driving the results.

🥈 OtterlyAI — best if you want inexpensive + simple

Otterly is particularly attractive if you want to add AI visibility reporting to an existing SEO/content retainer without spending enterprise money. Its agency-oriented plans provide multiple client workspaces, team members and reports; current published pricing starts at $189/month for the Standard agency-capable tier. Semrush

I'd choose it over Peec if your clients mostly need clean monthly visibility reports rather than deep analysis.

🥉 Profound — best for high-value enterprise clients

If you're selling AI-search strategy to large brands, Profound is the more serious enterprise option. It goes deeper into AI search monitoring, citations, competitive intelligence and optimization, but the economics make more sense when you're charging substantial retainers. Recent agency comparisons put its enterprise/agency positioning ahead of the lighter-weight trackers. Semrush Bloomiro

For polished reports specifically

If "I want to press a button and send the client a beautiful branded report" is the overriding requirement, I'd also look closely at Scrunch and Ayzeo.

Ayzeo, for example, currently advertises white-label PDF reports, unlimited seats and multi-client pricing, which is unusually well aligned with an agency delivery model. Ayzeo Ayzeo

What I'd actually buy

• 5–15 clients: Otterly or Ayzeo
• 15–50 clients: Peec AI
• 50+ / enterprise clients: Profound or Scrunch
• Already deeply invested in Semrush: Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
• Reports are a major part of your deliverable: Ayzeo/Scrunch deserve a serious test

One important caveat: don't evaluate these purely on "number of AI engines." For an agency, I'd weight repeatable prompt tracking, SOV methodology, client segmentation, historical data, citation-level evidence, white-label exports, scheduled reports and pricing as clients are added much more heavily. Current agency comparisons consistently identify those as the differentiators. ai-visibility-software.com Ayzeo

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 30, 100) and whether you need PDF reports, Looker Studio, or both, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and compare actual pricing/features for your agency size.

Your brand: 23% AI Share of Voice
Competitor A: 31%
Competitor B: 18%
Competitor C: 12%

…and then drill into which prompts caused the gap and which websites/models are driving the results.

🥈 OtterlyAI — best if you want inexpensive + simple

Otterly is particularly attractive if you want to add AI visibility reporting to an existing SEO/content retainer without spending enterprise money. Its agency-oriented plans provide multiple client workspaces, team members and reports; current published pricing starts at $189/month for the Standard agency-capable tier. Semrush

I'd choose it over Peec if your clients mostly need clean monthly visibility reports rather than deep analysis.

🥉 Profound — best for high-value enterprise clients

If you're selling AI-search strategy to large brands, Profound is the more serious enterprise option. It goes deeper into AI search monitoring, citations, competitive intelligence and optimization, but the economics make more sense when you're charging substantial retainers. Recent agency comparisons put its enterprise/agency positioning ahead of the lighter-weight trackers. Semrush Bloomiro

For polished reports specifically

If "I want to press a button and send the client a beautiful branded report" is the overriding requirement, I'd also look closely at Scrunch and Ayzeo.

Ayzeo, for example, currently advertises white-label PDF reports, unlimited seats and multi-client pricing, which is unusually well aligned with an agency delivery model.

What I'd actually buy

If you’re an agency managing multiple clients, I’d shortlist these three:

1. Peec AI — my pick for most agencies

Peec is particularly well designed around the agency use case: one account can manage separate client workspaces, with unlimited client seats and automated reporting. It tracks share of voice, visibility, position, sentiment and citations across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode and Copilot. Peec Peec

The standout is reporting: you can push data into Looker Studio for branded client dashboards, export CSV/API data, and use its MCP integration to automate weekly client summaries and even generate a multi-client Google Slides deck. Peec

Best if: you want AI visibility to become a repeatable agency deliverable rather than just another analytics tool.

2. OtterlyAI — best if polished reports matter

Otterly has a very agency-friendly workspace model: separate workspaces for each client, unlimited brand reports, competitor/citation analysis, and exports. Otterly Otterly

Its Looker Studio connector is particularly useful because you can build your own branded client dashboard and schedule delivery. It also supports PDF/CSV exports. OtterlyAI OtterlyAI

One caveat: Otterly's native interface isn't currently white-label, so if you want your agency branding, Looker Studio is the route. OtterlyAI

Best if: you already use Looker Studio and want to bolt AI visibility onto your existing reporting stack.

3. Profound — best for sophisticated clients

Profound has strong Share of Voice, Visibility Score, Average Position and Citation Rank reporting, with configurable dashboards, saved filters, public links and PDF exports. Profound

I'd lean toward it when clients expect deeper AEO/GEO analysis and you're willing to pay more for a sophisticated platform.

Best if: you're selling high-end AI search strategy to larger brands.

My ranking

For a typical 5–50 client agency:

1. 🥇 Peec AI — best combination of multi-client management + SOV + automation + reporting
2. 🥈 OtterlyAI — best straightforward/affordable agency reporting workflow
3. 🥉 Profound — best depth for enterprise/AEO-heavy engagements

One important distinction: don't choose based simply on how many AI engines they track. For an agency, I'd prioritize client isolation → SOV/competitor benchmarking → automated data collection → branded reports → API/Looker integration → cost per client. That's what determines whether the tool saves your team time or creates another manual reporting job.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want PDF/PowerPoint reports or live branded dashboards, I can narrow this down to the best 1–2 options and compare pricing.

Best if: you want AI visibility to become a repeatable agency deliverable rather than just another analytics tool.

2. OtterlyAI — best if polished reports matter

Otterly has a very agency-friendly workspace model: separate workspaces for each client, unlimited brand reports, competitor/citation analysis, and exports. Otterly Otterly

Its Looker Studio connector is particularly useful because you can build your own branded client dashboard and schedule delivery. It also supports PDF/CSV exports. help.otterly.ai help.otterly.ai

One caveat: Otterly's native interface isn't currently white-label, so if you want your agency branding, Looker Studio is the route. help.otterly.ai

Best if: you already use Looker Studio and want to bolt AI visibility onto your existing reporting stack.

3. Profound — best for sophisticated clients

Profound has strong Share of Voice, Visibility Score, Average Position and Citation Rank reporting, with configurable dashboards, saved filters, public links and PDF exports.

I'd lean toward it when clients expect deeper AEO/GEO analysis and you're willing to pay more for a sophisticated platform.

Best if: you're selling high-end AI search strategy to larger brands.

My ranking

For a typical 5–50 client agency:

If your priority is agency use: multiple clients + AI share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

*Some multi-client/workspace functionality is plan-dependent. Baarely DeepSmith

1. Peec AI — my pick for most agencies

Peec is probably the sweet spot if you're running, say, 5–30 client accounts and want a serious AI visibility product without jumping straight to enterprise software.

It tracks visibility/share of voice, position, sentiment, competitors and citations across multiple AI engines. Its agency offering supports multiple client projects, and its Looker Studio connector + exports/API give you a practical path to branded client dashboards. The Rank Masters DeepSmith

Choose it if: you want good analytics and a repeatable reporting system rather than merely an AI-monitoring dashboard.

2. Otterly.ai — best value

Otterly is compelling if you want to get an agency reporting operation running cheaply. It covers major AI surfaces, tracks mentions/citations/sentiment and share of voice, and has a Looker Studio reporting workflow. Recent agency comparisons specifically highlight it as one of the easiest routes to branded client reports. DeepSmith The Rank Masters

The tradeoff is that the polished/white-label experience is more "Otterly → Looker Studio → your template" than a completely native white-label reporting product.

Choose it if: you have a strong Looker Studio template and want to keep software costs down.

3. Profound — best for enterprise

Profound is the one I'd investigate for large clients where AI visibility is becoming a substantial strategic reporting service. It has particularly deep analytics, broad answer-engine coverage and enterprise-oriented capabilities. Recent comparisons put it ahead for enterprise use, while noting that its white-label reporting is less straightforward than agency-native alternatives. Baarely DeepSmith

Choose it if: clients care about sophisticated research, prompt volumes, competitive intelligence and enterprise governance more than minimizing your tooling cost.

4. Scrunch AI

Scrunch is worth looking at if you don't want reporting to stop at "your share of voice went from 18% → 24%." It combines visibility monitoring with recommendations/content-oriented workflows and supports Looker Studio reporting. Baarely DeepSmith

Choose it if: you're selling GEO/AEO as an optimization service, not just a measurement service.

5. Baarely — particularly interesting for polished deliverables

If the report itself is the product, Baarely deserves a demo. Current comparisons report native white-label PDF and self-contained HTML reports, specifically aimed at agencies. Baarely

That's a meaningful distinction: with Peec/Otterly, you may build your own beautiful Looker Studio reporting layer; with Baarely, the vendor is explicitly leaning into the agency report workflow.

What I'd buy

For an agency, I'd rank the buying decisions:

Peec → Otterly → Profound → Scrunch → Baarely

But there's an important wrinkle:

• Want the best analytics/workflow: Peec
• Want lowest cost + good reporting: Otterly
• Want enterprise-grade intelligence: Profound
• Want visibility + recommendations: Scrunch
• Want gorgeous white-label PDFs/HTML: Baarely

And I wouldn't choose based solely on the number of AI engines. What matters more is whether it can give you consistent prompt sets, competitor SOV, citation/source analysis, historical trends, client isolation, scheduled reporting and a reusable branded report. That's what determines whether your team can actually run 20+ accounts without creating a monthly reporting nightmare. DeepSmith

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 5, 20, 50+) and whether you want PDF reports or a live branded dashboard, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and compare their current agency pricing.

It tracks visibility/share of voice, position, sentiment, competitors and citations across multiple AI engines. Its agency offering supports multiple client projects, and its Looker Studio connector + exports/API give you a practical path to branded client dashboards. The Rank Masters DeepSmith

Choose it if: you want good analytics and a repeatable reporting system rather than merely an AI-monitoring dashboard.

2. Otterly.ai — best value

Otterly is compelling if you want to get an agency reporting operation running cheaply. It covers major AI surfaces, tracks mentions/citations/sentiment and share of voice, and has a Looker Studio reporting workflow. Recent agency comparisons specifically highlight it as one of the easiest routes to branded client reports. DeepSmith The Rank Masters

The tradeoff is that the polished/white-label experience is more "Otterly → Looker Studio → your template" than a completely native white-label reporting product.

Choose it if: you have a strong Looker Studio template and want to keep software costs down.

3. Profound — best for enterprise

Profound is the one I'd investigate for large clients where AI visibility is becoming a substantial strategic reporting service. It has particularly deep analytics, broad answer-engine coverage and enterprise-oriented capabilities. Recent comparisons put it ahead for enterprise use, while noting that its white-label reporting is less straightforward than agency-native alternatives. Baarely DeepSmith

Choose it if: clients care about sophisticated research, prompt volumes, competitive intelligence and enterprise governance more than minimizing your tooling cost.

4. Scrunch AI

Scrunch is worth looking at if you don't want reporting to stop at "your share of voice went from 18% → 24%." It combines visibility monitoring with recommendations/content-oriented workflows and supports Looker Studio reporting. Baarely DeepSmith

Choose it if: you're selling GEO/AEO as an optimization service, not just a measurement service.

5. Baarely — particularly interesting for polished deliverables

If the report itself is the product, Baarely deserves a demo. Current comparisons report native white-label PDF and self-contained HTML reports, specifically aimed at agencies. Baarely

That's a meaningful distinction: with Peec/Otterly, you may build your own beautiful Looker Studio reporting layer; with Baarely, the vendor is explicitly leaning into the agency report workflow.

What I'd buy

For an agency, I'd rank the buying decisions:

Peec → Otterly → Profound → Scrunch → Baarely

But there's an important wrinkle:

• Want the best analytics/workflow: Peec
• Want lowest cost + good reporting: Otterly
• Want enterprise-grade intelligence: Profound
• Want visibility + recommendations: Scrunch
• Want gorgeous white-label PDFs/HTML: Baarely

And I wouldn't choose based solely on the number of AI engines. What matters more is whether it can give you consistent prompt sets, competitor SOV, citation/source analysis, historical trends, client isolation, scheduled reporting and a reusable branded report. That's what determines whether your team can actually run 20+ accounts without creating a monthly reporting nightmare.

If your priority is agency-scale AI share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

1. peec.ai — my top pick

Peec is probably the strongest fit if you're an SEO/GEO agency managing a meaningful client roster. It gives you separate client workspaces, competitor benchmarking, daily tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot, and explicit share-of-voice metrics. Peec AI Peec AI

The reporting workflow is particularly compelling: branded Looker Studio dashboards, CSV/API exports, and its MCP workflow can automatically turn multiple client reports into a Google Slides deck with one slide per client. Peec AI Peec AI

Best if: you want one system to run the whole agency operation rather than just generate a pretty report.

2. zumihq.com — best for white-label/QBRs

Zumi looks especially good if the deliverable is what matters most. It supports isolated client workspaces, competitor sets, share of voice, and up to nine AI engines. Its agency plans include white-label reporting, with agency logo/colors on exports and branded PDFs. Zumi

Best if: you want clients to feel like the report is entirely your agency's proprietary reporting product.

3. rankfender.com — best automated report generator

Rankfender is unusually focused on eliminating the "build another Google Slides report" problem. It produces 10-section white-label reports, includes competitive share of voice, can combine AI visibility with GSC/GA4 data, schedules weekly/monthly delivery, and exports PDFs. RankFender

Best if: your biggest pain is monthly reporting production rather than analysis.

4. seerly.app — best for defensible client reporting

A nice differentiator is the evidence trail: clients can drill from a metric back to the underlying AI response. It reports visibility, sentiment, citations, competitive SOV and rolling 7/30/90-day comparisons, with agency branding. Seerly

Best if: sophisticated clients are going to challenge where your AI visibility numbers came from.

5. genrank.io — good simple alternative

Genrank has separate workspaces per client, client-specific prompts/competitors, daily visibility/position/citation/sentiment tracking and downloadable client reports. Its usage-based billing could also be attractive if your client roster fluctuates. Genrank

6. citenzo.com — reporting-first option

Citenzo is worth considering if you primarily want a clean white-label monthly AI visibility report: score, SOV, competitor positioning and before/after lift. It supports multiple client projects under one dashboard. Citenzo

What I'd choose

For an SEO/GEO agency with 10+ clients: Peec AI.

For a premium agency where the PDF/QBR experience is the product: Zumi or Rankfender.

For clients who demand proof behind every number: Seerly.

One important distinction: don't evaluate these solely on "AI visibility score." For agency reporting, I'd insist on SOV vs named competitors + mention rate + position + citations/sources + trend over time + underlying AI responses + white-label export. Otherwise you're essentially selling clients a vanity score.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want PDF, Google Slides, Looker Studio, or a client portal, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare current pricing/features.

If your priority is multi-client AI share-of-voice tracking + polished agency reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

For an agency specifically, Peec is probably the closest match to what you're describing. Its agency offering is explicitly designed around running multiple clients from one account, with branded dashboards, automated reporting, CSV/API exports, and client-facing dashboards that don't require clients to log in. Peec AI Peec AI

The particularly useful part is its reporting automation: Peec says its MCP can pull visibility, sentiment and share of voice, compare week-over-week, generate client summaries, and compile them into a Google Slides deck with one slide per client. Peec AI

That's unusually well aligned with an agency workflow.

🏢 Profound if reporting depth matters more than agency economics

tryprofound.com is the one I'd investigate if you're dealing with larger clients and want deeper enterprise-grade AI-search intelligence. It has broader answer-engine coverage and sophisticated citation/visibility analysis, but it's less compelling if your primary requirement is efficiently producing beautiful recurring reports across dozens of smaller accounts. Bloomiro DataDab

💰 Otterly if you want to keep costs down

otterly.ai is attractive for agencies that need the basic measurement layer without jumping to enterprise pricing. Its weakness for your use case is reporting: third-party comparisons note that it doesn't offer native white-label reporting, so you'd likely build the presentation layer in Looker Studio or another reporting system. Baarely

🎯 What I'd choose by agency size

• 5–30 clients: Peec AI
• 30–100+ clients: Peec AI, then evaluate Profound if you need significantly deeper enterprise data
• Small agency / testing the service: Otterly.ai
• Enterprise agency with sophisticated content/AEO workflows: Scrunch AI or Profound
• Already heavily invested in Ahrefs: Ahrefs Brand Radar

One important distinction: don't evaluate these purely on "AI visibility score." For client reporting, I'd insist on share of voice by prompt/category, competitor comparison, mention rate, citation share, sentiment, trend over time, and export/API access. Those are what turn an interesting AI-search dashboard into something you can actually put in a monthly client deck. DataDab

If I were buying today for an agency, I'd demo Peec first. Its agency workflow and automated client reporting are the strongest match to your requirements. Peec AI Peec AI

That's unusually well aligned with an agency workflow.

🏢 Profound if reporting depth matters more than agency economics

tryprofound.com is the one I'd investigate if you're dealing with larger clients and want deeper enterprise-grade AI-search intelligence. It has broader answer-engine coverage and sophisticated citation/visibility analysis, but it's less compelling if your primary requirement is efficiently producing beautiful recurring reports across dozens of smaller accounts. bloomiro.com datadab.com

💰 Otterly if you want to keep costs down

otterly.ai is attractive for agencies that need the basic measurement layer without jumping to enterprise pricing. Its weakness for your use case is reporting: third-party comparisons note that it doesn't offer native white-label reporting, so you'd likely build the presentation layer in Looker Studio or another reporting system.

If your priority is agency-scale, multi-client AI share-of-voice tracking + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

1. Peec AI — my pick for most agencies

Peec is unusually well aligned with the workflow you described. It supports multiple client projects from one agency account, unlimited client seats, daily tracking, competitor benchmarking, and share of voice. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and Microsoft Copilot. Peec AI Peec AI

The reporting side is particularly compelling: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards, give clients read-only links without requiring a Peec login, export CSV, and use the API for custom reporting. Peec AI Peec AI

It also has agency-specific pitch projects, which is useful if you're selling GEO/AEO services and want to show a prospect their competitive AI visibility before they sign. Peec AI

Why I'd choose it: excellent combination of multi-client management, SOV metrics, automated reporting and reasonable agency economics.

2. Profound — best if the reports need to impress enterprise clients

Profound is the one I'd demo if you're working with larger brands or want a deeper AEO analytics platform.

Its reporting dashboards support Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, with filters for topics, platforms, regions, personas and dates. You can export dashboards directly to PDF or provide public links to clients. Profound

It also goes beyond basic SOV into citation share, co-citation, co-mention and competitor analysis, which can make a monthly agency report considerably more strategic than "your ChatGPT visibility went from 18% to 23%." Profound Profound Knowledge Base

Why I'd choose it: if your clients expect an expensive-looking AEO intelligence product rather than just monitoring software.

3. Scrunch

I'd put Scrunch on the shortlist if enterprise requirements, security and deeper AI-search infrastructure matter. A recent 2026 agency comparison specifically highlights its SOC 2 Type II positioning and agency plans. AI Visibility Software

What I'd actually do

For an agency managing, say, 10–100 clients, I'd demo in this order:

1. Peec — best balance of agency workflow + SOV + reporting.
2. Profound — best if you're selling premium AEO strategy and need sophisticated client-facing analytics.
3. Scrunch — best if enterprise/security requirements are important.
4. Temso — worth pricing against the above if engine coverage and cost are major considerations.

One important distinction: don't evaluate these purely on "AI visibility." For an agency report, I'd require at least SOV vs. competitors, visibility by LLM, average position, sentiment, citation share/domains, prompt-level evidence, historical trend, and client-ready export/dashboarding. Otherwise you're essentially buying a prettier rank tracker.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want white-label PDFs/decks vs. live dashboards, I can narrow this to the 2–3 strongest options and compare their agency pricing/workflows.

The reporting side is particularly compelling: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards, give clients read-only links without requiring a Peec login, export CSV, and use the API for custom reporting. Peec AI Peec AI

It also has agency-specific pitch projects, which is useful if you're selling GEO/AEO services and want to show a prospect their competitive AI visibility before they sign. Peec AI

Why I'd choose it: excellent combination of multi-client management, SOV metrics, automated reporting and reasonable agency economics.

2. Profound — best if the reports need to impress enterprise clients

Profound is the one I'd demo if you're working with larger brands or want a deeper AEO analytics platform.

Its reporting dashboards support Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, with filters for topics, platforms, regions, personas and dates. You can export dashboards directly to PDF or provide public links to clients. tryprofound.com

It also goes beyond basic SOV into citation share, co-citation, co-mention and competitor analysis, which can make a monthly agency report considerably more strategic than "your ChatGPT visibility went from 18% to 23%."

Why I'd choose it: if your clients expect an expensive-looking AEO intelligence product rather than just monitoring software.

3. Scrunch

If you mean AI/GEO share of voice across many client accounts, with client-ready reporting as a major requirement, I’d shortlist these:

1. Peec AI — my first choice

Peec is unusually well matched to an agency model: isolated client projects, unlimited client/team seats on its agency offering, competitor benchmarking, share of voice, sentiment, citations and visibility tracking. It also has a Looker Studio connector, CSV/API export, and an MCP workflow that can generate recurring client summaries and Google Slides decks. peec.aiwww.semrush.com

The particularly useful bit for your requirement is that you can build one polished reporting template and replicate it across clients, rather than manually assembling reports.

Peec AI for Agencies

I'd pick this if: you're managing ~10–100+ clients and want the reporting process to become largely repeatable.

2. Otterly.AI — best value

Otterly is compelling if you want straightforward tracking without jumping immediately into enterprise pricing. Its agency tiers support multiple client workspaces, team members and reports, and it covers ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, with additional engines available as add-ons. peec.aiwww.semrush.com

Its reports cover things clients actually understand: visibility/coverage over time, mentions, position, competitors, prompts and citations. peec.aiwww.semrush.com

Otterly.AI

I'd pick this if: you want to launch an AI-visibility reporting service cheaply and don't need the deepest analytics.

3. Scrunch AI — best for enterprise agency clients

Scrunch makes more sense when your clients care about governance, security and sophisticated multi-brand management. Current comparisons highlight its enterprise-oriented multi-brand workspaces and SOC 2 positioning. www.ai-visibility-software.com

I'd pick this if: you're selling AI visibility to large brands rather than primarily SMBs.

4. Profound — deepest intelligence

Profound is excellent when the question isn't just "What's our AI share of voice?" but "Why are we losing this category, which sources are influencing the answers, and what should an enterprise SEO/PR team do about it?"

It's considerably more enterprise-oriented than agency-oriented, though, so I wouldn't make it my first choice for a 30-client agency. Current comparisons put it at the high end of the market and emphasize its citation intelligence. www.ai-visibility-software.com

5. SE Ranking / SE Visible

Worth considering if you're already an SEO agency. You get conventional rank tracking/reporting alongside AI visibility rather than introducing a completely separate platform. Current agency comparisons put SE Ranking among the stronger options for white-label client reporting. klicksdesign.com

What I'd actually buy

For a typical 10–50 client digital/SEO agency:

Peec AI → first demo
Otterly → second demo
SE Ranking → if you already use it for SEO
Scrunch → if your clients are enterprise
Profound → if deep enterprise intelligence matters more than agency economics

One important distinction: don't optimize for the number of AI engines tracked. The real differentiator is whether you can turn the underlying prompt data into a repeatable client deliverable.

I'd specifically demo these five things:

1. Share of voice by client + competitor
2. Category/non-branded prompts rather than just branded queries
3. Citation/source analysis — which domains are getting cited instead of the client
4. Automated monthly PDF/Slides/dashboard reporting
5. White-labeling + API/Looker Studio export

For your exact requirement—"many clients + AI share of voice + polished reports"—Peec is the one I'd investigate first. Its agency workflow is currently the closest fit I've found to treating AI visibility as a scalable agency deliverable rather than just another SEO dashboard. peec.ai

If your priorities are multi-client management + AI share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My picks

1. AgencyAnalytics — best if you already sell SEO/PPC/reporting

Its AI Tracker puts AI visibility alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic and revenue rather than creating another isolated dashboard. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, benchmarks competitors, and feeds the data into its existing customizable client reports. agencyanalytics.com

AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker

2. Zumi — best AI-native agency product

This is particularly compelling if you're building an actual GEO/AEO service rather than merely adding AI metrics to existing reports. Each client gets an isolated workspace with its own prompts and competitors, and it supports white-label agency branding. It currently advertises tracking across up to nine AI engines and branded PDF/CSV exports. www.zumihq.com

Zumi for Agencies

3. LLM Pulse — best for white-label client portals

Strong fit if the deliverable is meant to look like your agency's own software. It offers white-label client portals, unlimited seats, multi-project management, share-of-voice tracking, and CSV/Excel plus Looker Studio exports. llmpulse.ai

LLM Pulse for Agencies

4. Rankfender — best if "beautiful PDF every month" is the main requirement

Its agency workflow is unusually report-centric: white-label 10-section reports, competitive SOV, KPI trends, scheduled weekly/monthly delivery, client portals and PDF export. rankfender.com

Rankfender Reports & Analytics

One I'd watch closely

Spyglasses looks interesting for agencies that want to get beyond a pretty dashboard and retain access to the underlying data. It offers per-client usage reporting, CSV export, daily tracking and white-labeled reports, with SOV/competitor data visible at the client level. www.spyglasses.io

Spyglasses for Agencies

Bottom line

If I were evaluating for an agency today:

• Already using AgencyAnalytics: → AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker
• Building a dedicated AI-search/GEO service: → Zumi
• White-label portal is critical: → LLM Pulse
• Reports/PDFs are the #1 deliverable: → Rankfender
• Want deeper raw data/usage control: → Spyglasses

One important distinction: don't evaluate these solely on the headline "AI visibility score." For agency reporting, I'd insist on prompt-level SOV, competitor SOV, engine-by-engine breakdown, citation/source data, historical trends, client separation, white labeling, scheduled exports, and raw-data export. Those are what make the number defensible in a QBR. Seerly, for example, explicitly exposes the underlying AI response behind reported numbers, which is a useful safeguard when clients challenge a metric. seerly.app

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (10 / 50 / 100+) and whether you need white-label PDF, live dashboards, or both, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare current pricing.

If your priority is agency-scale AI share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: Peec AI

For a typical agency managing, say, 10–50 clients, I'd start with Peec.

It is unusually agency-oriented: one account can manage multiple client projects, with daily tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot. It measures visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice against competitors. peec.ai

The reporting side is particularly strong:

• Branded Looker Studio dashboards
• Client links that don't require the client to have a Peec login
• CSV + API exports
• Automated weekly reporting
• MCP integration that can turn each client's metrics into summaries and even compile them into a Google Slides deck
• Unlimited client seats on agency plans, according to Peec peec.ai

That combination makes it more than an AI-rank tracker—you can actually build a repeatable monthly/QBR reporting product around it.

OtterlyAI is the other one I'd demo

OtterlyAI is compelling if you want something relatively straightforward to deploy across lots of smaller clients. Its Workspaces separate clients, prompts and reports, and it supports six major AI/search surfaces. It also has a Looker Studio connector, CSV exports and automated reporting. otterly.ai

I'd lean Otterly over Peec if your agency already lives in Looker Studio and wants a relatively lightweight monitoring/reporting layer.

Profound if the reports need to impress enterprise clients

Profound has particularly polished configurable dashboards: you can build views around Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, save filters/layouts, and distribute them through PDF exports or public links. www.tryprofound.com

I'd choose it when the agency is selling a higher-end GEO/AEO consulting engagement, rather than simply adding AI visibility tracking to an SEO retainer.

What I'd actually test before buying

Don't just compare feature lists. Put the same 20–30 prompts and 5 competitors into 2–3 platforms and compare:

1. SOV methodology — are they measuring mentions, weighted position, or something else?
2. Prompt coverage — can you create genuinely client-specific prompts at scale?
3. Engine coverage — especially ChatGPT + Google AI Overviews/AI Mode + Gemini + Perplexity.
4. Historical data — can you show a convincing 30/60/90-day trend?
5. Citation data — can you explain why a competitor has higher SOV?
6. Reporting automation — can a client report go out without an analyst rebuilding it every month?
7. White-labeling — logo, colors, custom domain/link, no vendor branding.
8. Exports/API — important if you eventually want to combine AI SOV with GA4, Search Console, CRM and traditional SEO data.

Bottom line:
Peec → best all-around choice for an agency.
OtterlyAI → best if you want scalable, relatively simple multi-client monitoring + Looker reporting.
Profound → best if sophisticated dashboards and enterprise-grade AEO reporting matter most.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want PDF/PowerPoint reports vs. live white-label dashboards, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their current agency pricing.

If your priorities are (1) AI share of voice across many client accounts and (2) reports that look polished enough to send straight to clients, I’d shortlist these:

1. Peec AI — my default recommendation

Peec is unusually well aligned with the exact agency workflow you're describing. It tracks share of voice, visibility, position, sentiment and citations, and its agency plans let you manage multiple clients from one account. peec.ai

The reporting side is particularly compelling: you can push data into Looker Studio, export CSV/API data, and create client dashboards without requiring clients to log into Peec. It also has an MCP workflow that can automatically generate client summaries and compile them into Google Slides. peec.ai

Why I'd choose it: very good balance between actual AI-SOV measurement and agency operational efficiency.

2. OtterlyAI — best if you want to scale cheaply

Otterly is another very agency-oriented option. It supports separate workspaces for clients, automated weekly reports, multi-client dashboards, Looker Studio, and CSV exports. otterly.aiotterly.ai

It currently tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. otterly.aiotterly.ai

Why I'd choose it: if you're building a productized "AI visibility report" that you want to roll out to dozens of clients without creating a lot of manual work.

3. Profound — best-looking reporting / enterprise option

Profound is probably the one I'd demo if presentation quality is the #1 priority. Its dashboards explicitly support Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, with configurable layouts, filters and visualizations. You can share live public dashboards or export them directly to PDF. www.tryprofound.comhelp.tryprofound.comwww.tryprofound.comscrunch.comdeepsmith.ai

Its data model is also quite deep: SOV, citation share, sentiment, position and platform-level analysis can all be broken down by competitor/topic/platform. help.tryprofound.com

The catch is price. Its published Growth plan is $399/month, while multi-company/agency functionality is positioned under Enterprise/custom pricing. www.tryprofound.com

Why I'd choose it: large agency, enterprise clients, or when a slick executive-facing dashboard matters more than minimizing software cost.

4. Scrunch — best for sophisticated GEO analysis

Scrunch's SOV measurement is particularly granular. You can slice competitive presence by topic, prompt, platform, persona, funnel stage and country, and separately analyze citation share and the domains/pages being cited. scrunch.com

That's excellent if your agency doesn't just want to tell a client "your AI visibility went from 12% to 18%", but wants to explain why and what content/PR changes could increase it.

The downside is that genuine multi-client isolation appears to be more of an enterprise proposition, so I'd verify pricing before choosing it for a large client roster. deepsmith.ai

5. Semrush — best if you're already a Semrush agency

Semrush's AI Visibility product now explicitly measures AI SOV based on both mention frequency and position, and offers white-label reporting, shareable exports, automated reports and competitor benchmarking. www.semrush.com

This is attractive if your clients already receive conventional SEO reports from Semrush: you can put Google SEO + AI visibility/SOV into the same reporting ecosystem instead of introducing another platform.

My ranking for your use case

If I were running the agency:

1. 🥇 Peec AI — best overall agency workflow
2. 🥈 OtterlyAI — best combination of scale + price + reporting
3. 🥉 Profound — best premium/client-facing reporting
4. Scrunch — best analytical depth for serious GEO work
5. Semrush — best if you're already heavily invested in Semrush

One important distinction: don't evaluate these purely on "AI visibility." For client reporting, I'd insist on at least:

• AI Share of Voice vs. named competitors
• Visibility/mention rate
• Average position
• Citation share + top cited URLs/domains
• Platform breakdown (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI, etc.)
• Prompt/topic breakdown
• Historical trend
• White-label or client-safe dashboards
• PDF/Google Slides export
• Looker Studio/API access
• Multiple isolated client workspaces
• Ability to standardize the same report template across every client

For a 20–100 client agency, I'd start demos with Peec and Otterly, then benchmark Profound if you're willing to pay for a more premium reporting experience. The difference between them becomes much more important once you're talking about hundreds/thousands of tracked prompts rather than a handful.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need PDF/PowerPoint reports vs. live white-label dashboards, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 and compare their current agency pricing.

If your priority is multi-client AI share-of-voice tracking + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 Peec AI — my first choice

Peec AI is particularly well suited to agencies. It tracks visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice against competitors, and its agency setup supports separate client projects. peec.aipeec.aiotterly.aiotterly.ai

The reporting workflow is the standout: you can create branded Looker Studio dashboards, give clients access without requiring a Peec login, export CSV, and feed the data via API into BigQuery, Tableau or Power BI. It also has MCP automation that can generate weekly client summaries and even one-slide-per-client decks. peec.aipeec.aiotterly.aiotterly.ai

I'd pick it if: you have 5–50+ clients and want your reporting process to feel standardized rather than manually assembled.

🥈 OtterlyAI — best for straightforward agency operations

OtterlyAI is purpose-built around agency use: separate workspaces per client, custom prompt sets, team access controls and pitch workspaces. It monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. otterly.ai

Its Agency Partner offering also includes custom branded Looker Studio reporting, which is a big plus if you need something client-facing without building your own reporting layer. otterly.ai

I'd pick it if: you want something your account managers can learn quickly and deploy across clients.

🥉 Profound — best for enterprise-level intelligence

Profound is the one I'd investigate for larger clients who care less about cheap reporting and more about deep answer/citation analysis and competitive intelligence. Current comparisons put it in the enterprise tier, with particularly deep analysis of what AI systems are saying and citing. www.therankmasters.com

I'd pick it if: your agency sells high-end GEO/AEO strategy and needs the data to withstand scrutiny from sophisticated marketing teams.

Worth considering: AISoV

AISoV is much more narrowly focused. It lets agencies maintain separate client reports, compare competitors, preserve prompt sets, share reports and export HTML. sov.braign.io

That's attractive if your deliverable is basically:

AI Share of Voice → competitor comparison → citations → monthly client report

rather than a full GEO optimization platform.

My recommendation by agency type

• Most agencies: Peec AI
• Small/lean agency: OtterlyAI
• Enterprise/large retainers: Profound
• SEO agency wanting one broader platform: Conductor
• You primarily need beautiful SOV reports: AISoV

One important distinction: don't optimize purely for the number of AI engines tracked. For agency reporting, I'd prioritize consistent prompt sets, historical SOV, competitor benchmarking, citation/source data, client separation, white-label dashboards, and API/CSV/Looker Studio export. Those are what determine whether the tool actually saves your team hours every month. Current agency comparisons similarly emphasize multi-client workspaces, white-label reporting, exportability and repeatable reporting workflows. www.therankmasters.comwww.ai-visibility-software.com

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want PDF/PowerPoint reports or live branded dashboards, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their current pricing.

For an agency managing multiple clients, I’d prioritize platforms that have:

1. Multi-client workspaces
2. Competitor share-of-voice tracking
3. AI engine coverage (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, etc.)
4. White-label exports / polished PDFs
5. Repeatable monthly reporting workflows

Here are the strongest options I’d shortlist:

My picks by agency type

Small/mid-size SEO or marketing agency (5–50 clients)
→ AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker
Best operational fit because your AI metrics live beside your existing client reporting stack. agencyanalytics.com

Agency selling “AI visibility” as a new service line
→ AISoV or AgencyScope
They are more presentation-oriented and make it easier to package a recurring AI visibility report. agencyscope.aisov.braign.io

Enterprise SEO agency / large brands
→ Scrunch, Semrush, or enterprise-focused platforms
Better when clients care about methodology, scale, and broader search intelligence. www.techradar.comwww.ai-visibility-software.com

Features I would require before buying

• Saved prompt libraries per client
• Competitor tracking (not just “did the brand appear?”)
• Citation/source reporting
• Trend comparisons month over month
• PDF export with agency branding
• Client portal or share links
• API access if you want custom dashboards

A practical agency report usually includes:

• AI Share of Voice %
• Mention rate
• Competitor comparison
• Top prompts where the client wins/loses
• Sources AI engines cite
• Recommended content/actions for next month

For most agencies, I’d test AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker + AISoV first: one optimizes for scalable client reporting, the other for a dedicated AI visibility deliverable. sov.braign.ioagencyscope.aiagencyanalytics.com

For an agency managing multiple clients, I’d prioritize tools that have:

• multi-brand/client workspaces
• competitor benchmarking
• prompt libraries you can reuse
• white-label or polished exports
• scheduled reports/dashboards
• citation tracking (not just “mentioned/not mentioned”)
• enough methodology transparency to defend the metric in QBRs

Here are the strongest options right now:

My shortlist by agency type

SEO agency with 10–100 clients

1. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker
2. Omnia
3. Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Boutique agency selling “AI visibility/GEO” as a new service

1. AISoV
2. Astiva AI
3. ModelMention

PR/content agency

1. LLM Pulse
2. Omnia
3. ModelMention

Need the nicest client-facing reports

• AgencyAnalytics (especially if clients already receive dashboards)
• AISoV (simple shareable reports)
• Astiva (white-label positioning) agencyanalytics.com

What I would avoid

Be cautious with tools that only show:

• raw ChatGPT screenshots
• a single “AI visibility score”
• no competitor set
• no prompt methodology
• no citation/source analysis

Clients will quickly ask “why did this score move?” and you need an answer.

A practical agency reporting stack

A strong monthly deliverable usually includes:

1. AI Share of Voice
   • client vs. competitors
   • by model (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc.)

2. Citation intelligence
   • which domains AI engines rely on
   • where competitors are winning

3. Prompt gaps
   • “When users ask X, competitor Y appears but client does not”

4. Action plan
   • content briefs
   • digital PR targets
   • technical fixes

If you’re choosing one platform today for a general marketing agency, I’d start with AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker if you already run client dashboards, or Omnia if AI visibility itself is becoming a standalone service. www.useomnia.comagencyanalytics.com

If you’re an agency managing multiple clients, I’d narrow the field to these:

Current 2026 comparisons consistently put Otterly, Peec, Profound, and Promptwatch among the stronger agency-oriented options. ai-search-tools.comdeepsmith.aiwww.therankmasters.com

🥇 My pick: Otterly.AI

For your specific combination of “multiple clients + AI share of voice + polished exports,” I'd start here.

The important advantage is its agency workflow: separate client workspaces, competitor/share-of-voice tracking, citation monitoring, and branded Looker Studio reporting. That makes it particularly good when the actual deliverable is a recurring client report rather than just an internal dashboard. ai-search-tools.comdeepsmith.aiwww.therankmasters.com

It also tracks things beyond a simple “mentioned/not mentioned” metric—such as which URLs are being cited and the context around those citations. www.roberto-serra.com

Downside: the best white-label experience is through Looker Studio, so there is some initial dashboard setup/maintenance.

🥈 Peec AI — best clean, agency-friendly alternative

I'd choose Peec if you want something your strategists can use quickly without building a sophisticated reporting layer.

It is particularly attractive for agencies with several brands and multilingual clients, and current comparisons highlight its agency bundles and broad language coverage. ai-search-tools.com

The interface/reporting tends to be more straightforward than enterprise platforms, but it isn't as compelling as Otterly if your main selling point is a beautiful branded monthly report.

🥇 for enterprise: Profound

If your clients include large brands and you can justify enterprise pricing, Profound is probably the most powerful option.

Its agency functionality includes client/brand configurations and client-facing “pitch environments,” while its analytics go considerably deeper—including prompt volumes, agent analytics and AI shopping visibility. ai-search-tools.com

I'd not choose it for a typical SMB-heavy agency roster. You're likely paying for analytical depth your clients won't appreciate.

A useful distinction

Don't just compare “AI visibility” scores. For an agency, I'd require these five things:

1. Share of voice vs. named competitors
2. Prompt-level results — what questions are actually driving visibility
3. Citation/source reporting — why the model chose someone
4. Separate client workspaces
5. White-label PDF/dashboard output

A lot of tools can do #1. Far fewer make #4 and #5 painless. That's why Otterly is my default recommendation for an agency rather than simply picking the platform with the deepest AI-search analytics. ai-search-tools.comdeepsmith.aiwww.therankmasters.com

My shortlist:
Otterly → Peec → Profound, in that order for a typical agency.

If you tell me roughly how many clients (e.g. 10, 50, 100+) and your monthly budget, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 options and compare their actual agency pricing, prompt limits, engines, white-labeling, and export formats.

If you mean AI search / answer-engine share of voice—how often clients are mentioned or cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, etc.—I’d shortlist these for an agency in 2026:

Recent agency comparisons consistently put Peec, Otterly, Profound and Scrunch near the top, while Baarely stands out specifically for native white-label PDF/HTML reporting. www.ai-visibility-software.com

My recommendation

1. Peec AI — best overall

I'd start here if you're managing, say, 5–50 client brands and want a real analytics platform rather than just a monthly snapshot. It supports multiple projects/clients, tracks AI visibility across multiple engines, and is particularly strong for competitive share-of-voice analysis. Agency plans are explicitly designed around multiple clients and projects. nxtg.aiwww.therankmasters.com

The catch: polished white-label reporting isn't its clearest strength on the published agency plans. You may end up using its data through Looker Studio or another reporting layer. nxtg.ai

2. Otterly — best if you want cheap + easy

If your deliverable is essentially:

AI Share of Voice → mentions → competitors → citations → monthly trend

Otterly is hard to beat on economics. Current comparisons put entry pricing around $29/month, with agency/multi-client capabilities and reporting workflows. Its weakness is that native white-labeling isn't as strong—you'll generally want Looker Studio for a truly agency-branded report. www.ai-visibility-software.comwww.stork.ai

3. Baarely — best for beautiful client reports

This is the interesting one if your agency sells "AI visibility reporting" as a client-facing deliverable. Its agency offering specifically emphasizes white-label reports, including PDF and HTML formats, rather than making you construct the presentation layer yourself. www.ai-visibility-software.combaarely.com

I'd seriously demo it if your priority is:

• Agency logo/colors
• Client-ready PDF
• Executive-friendly charts
• Share-of-voice trend
• Competitor comparison
• "Here's what changed this month"
• Minimal work after the initial setup

4. Profound — best for high-value enterprise clients

Profound is more powerful when the question isn't merely "What's our AI share of voice?" but "Exactly what is AI saying about us, which sources influence those answers, and why are competitors winning?" Its answer-level and citation intelligence is considerably deeper. www.therankmasters.com

For a $10k+/month enterprise account, I'd favor it over a cheap monitoring tool. For 30 SMB clients, probably not.

One important distinction

Don't choose based purely on number of AI engines.

For agency reporting, I'd weight these roughly:

30% — multi-client management
25% — share-of-voice / competitive data quality
20% — client-ready reporting
15% — export/API/Looker Studio
10% — price per client

A platform can have a gorgeous dashboard but still be painful if you have to manually recreate 25 client reports every month.

If I were building the agency stack

I'd test Peec vs. Otterly vs. Baarely first.

• Peec → best analytics/data layer
• Otterly → best low-cost scalable option
• Baarely → best reporting/white-label layer

Then I'd only move up to Profound if your clients are large enough to value its deeper answer/citation intelligence.

One other option worth investigating is Spotlight, which recent agency comparisons specifically highlight for multi-brand dashboards and white-label exports. www.prismnews.com

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want PDF reports, live dashboards, or both, I can narrow this to the top 2–3 and compare actual per-client economics.

For an agency managing multiple clients, I’d prioritize tools that have:

• multi-brand/client workspaces
• AI engine coverage (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, AI Overviews, etc.)
• competitor share-of-voice tracking
• prompt-level evidence (not just a score)
• white-label PDFs or dashboards
• repeatable monthly reporting workflows

The strongest options right now:

My shortlist by agency type

1. SEO/content agency adding AI visibility as a new service

• Pick: Semrush + a dedicated AI visibility tool
• Reason: clients already understand SEO reporting, and you can add AI presence as a new KPI. www.techradar.com

2. Boutique agency selling “AI search optimization” retainers

• Pick: AgencyScope, Geneo, or AISoV
• Reason: the deliverable matters as much as the data. Client-ready PDFs and explainable metrics help justify the retainer. agencyscope.ai

3. Agency managing 20+ brands

• Pick: Geneo, LLM Pulse, or Gensiv
• Reason: you’ll care more about client separation, recurring monitoring, and scalable reporting than raw analytics depth. llmpulse.ai

Metrics I’d insist on showing clients

Avoid a single “AI visibility score” alone. Better monthly slides include:

• AI Share of Voice vs. 3–5 competitors
• % of tracked prompts where the brand appears
• position/order of appearance in answers
• citations/sources used by AI engines
• sentiment/context of mentions
• biggest visibility gaps and recommended actions

AI answers are variable, so repeated measurements over time are more meaningful than one-off checks. arxiv.org

If I were choosing for a typical 5–50 client digital agency, I’d start by demoing AgencyScope, Geneo, and LLM Pulse—they appear closest to the “run report → export beautiful client PDF → discuss in QBR” workflow. llmpulse.aiagencyscope.ai

If your priority is agency-scale tracking + client-ready reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My picks

1. Peec AI — best overall

I'd start here if you're building an ongoing AI-search reporting service. It focuses heavily on share of voice, competitor visibility, prompts, mentions and citations, rather than treating AI visibility as just another brand-monitoring metric. Current comparisons also consistently position it as a strong agency/multi-client option. www.prismnews.comwww.workduo.ai

2. Rankfender — best if the report itself is the product

This is particularly interesting if your clients expect a polished monthly PDF. It advertises white-label reports, custom branding, competitive share of voice, AI-system breakdowns, GSC/GA4 data, scheduled delivery, client portals and PDF export. rankfender.com

3. OtterlyAI — best cost/ease tradeoff

Very agency-oriented: it supports monitoring across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot, with brand mentions, citations, position and sentiment tracking plus automated reports. otterly.ai

4. Profound — best for high-value enterprise accounts

If you're charging a substantial monthly GEO/AEO retainer and need sophisticated competitive intelligence and analytics, Profound is worth evaluating. It's generally positioned toward enterprise rather than small agencies. www.prismnews.comwww.workduo.ai

What I'd actually buy

• 5–20 clients: Peec AI
• 20–100+ clients: Peec AI or OtterlyAI, depending on pricing/usage limits
• Clients care heavily about branded monthly PDFs: Rankfender
• Large enterprise / sophisticated strategy work: Profound
• Already deep in Semrush: add its AI Visibility capabilities rather than creating another disconnected reporting stack.

One important caveat: "AI share of voice" isn't yet a standardized metric. Different platforms can calculate visibility differently, so I'd demo the same 20–50 prompts in two or three platforms before committing. The key is whether the tool shows the underlying prompt → answer → mention → citation → competitor evidence, not merely a nice-looking percentage. Community testing also suggests meaningful differences between vendors' measurements. www.reddit.com

If you tell me roughly how many clients you have (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need white-label PDFs, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare current pricing, client limits, engines, API access, and report quality.

If your priority is multi-client agency management + AI share-of-voice tracking + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

1. Peec AI — my pick for most agencies

Peec is particularly well aligned with the workflow you're describing. Its agency offering lets you manage clients from one account, track visibility/share of voice and competitors, and create branded dashboards. It also supports CSV, Looker Studio and API exports. peec.ai

The standout feature for an agency is its reporting automation: Peec's MCP can loop through client projects, compare week-over-week visibility/SOV, generate summaries, and compile a Google Slides deck with one slide per client. peec.ai

Its current agency pricing starts around $245/month for 3 clients, with higher tiers at $495 and $795/month; exact prompt/credit economics matter if you have a lot of clients. peec.ai

I'd choose it if: you're selling AI visibility/GEO as an ongoing service and want reporting to become almost turnkey.

2. OtterlyAI — best if reporting simplicity matters

Otterly is excellent for agencies that want straightforward monitoring without a huge enterprise platform. It has workspaces for individual clients, unlimited brand reports, SOV, competitor comparison, citation analysis and exports. otterly.ai

Its big reporting advantage is the Looker Studio connector: you can create your own agency-branded dashboards and schedule automated delivery. You can also export PDF/CSV. help.otterly.ai

One caveat: Otterly doesn't have native white-labeling; the polished white-label experience is achieved through Looker Studio. help.otterly.ai

I'd choose it if: you already use Looker Studio and want a relatively inexpensive data source feeding your agency reporting system.

3. Scrunch — best for a broader GEO offering

Scrunch is more than a visibility dashboard. It combines monitoring, competitive/SOV analysis, auditing, optimization and AI-agent-related capabilities. Its agency positioning specifically emphasizes multi-client workflows and granular reporting/API access. ai-cdn.scrunchai.com

I'd choose it if: you're selling a comprehensive GEO/AEO program rather than simply "here's your AI visibility score."

4. Profound — best for large/enterprise accounts

Profound is the one I'd investigate for an agency handling large enterprise brands where depth and sophistication matter more than price. It tends to sit at the enterprise end of the market, whereas Peec/Otterly are easier to justify across a larger portfolio of mid-market clients. Recent comparisons similarly position Profound as the enterprise option. www.trylyra.ai

My recommendation

For a typical SEO/digital agency with 5–50 clients:

🥇 Peec AI → best overall agency operating system
🥈 OtterlyAI → best if you want simple + affordable + Looker Studio
🥉 Scrunch → best if you're building a sophisticated GEO service
Profound → move it to #1 if your clients are large enterprises with big budgets

One important caveat: don't sell a single SOV number as gospel. AI responses are nondeterministic, and research shows that repeated measurements can have substantial variance. Trends over a consistent prompt set are much more meaningful than one month's absolute percentage. arxiv.org

For client reporting, I'd want the platform to show SOV + visibility + competitor movement + prompt-level wins/losses + citations/sources, rather than just an impressive-looking percentage. That makes the report useful for explaining what the agency should actually do next. help.otterly.ai

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to track (e.g. 10, 50, 100+), I can narrow this down to the best price-per-client option and compare the actual limits.

For an agency managing AI share of voice (SOV) across multiple clients and needing client-ready reporting, the best tools depend on whether you mean visibility in ChatGPT/AI Overviews/Gemini-style answers, broader AI search optimization, or traditional SEO reporting with AI features.

Here are the strongest options:

My shortlist for agencies

1. Best overall for an AI-first agency: Profound

• Tracks:
  • Brand mentions in AI answers
  • Competitor visibility
  • Citation sources
  • Prompt-level performance
  • Market share of AI answers
• Best if you sell “AI search visibility” as a service.
• Strong for enterprise clients who expect executive dashboards.

2. Best agency value: Peec AI

• Built around AI search tracking.
• Easier to manage many brands/clients.
• Good fit if you need recurring reports like:
  • “Your brand appeared in 18% of tracked AI answers”
  • “Competitor X gained share this month”
  • “These sources influence AI recommendations”

3. Best if you already run SEO retainers: Semrush

• Useful when clients want one report combining:
  • SEO rankings
  • backlinks
  • traffic
  • AI visibility signals
• Less AI-specialized than Profound/Peec.

What I’d look for in an agency AI SOV platform

For multi-client use, prioritize:

✅ Multi-workspace/client separation
You should be able to duplicate reporting templates without rebuilding dashboards.

✅ Prompt portfolio tracking
Example:

• “best CRM for startups”
• “top accounting software”
• “agencies like ours”

Not just “brand mentioned/not mentioned.”

✅ Competitor share comparison
A useful client metric:

“Client appears in 32% of AI answers vs competitor A at 21%.”

✅ Citation/source reporting
Clients care why AI recommends someone:

• publications
• reviews
• directories
• forums
• authoritative pages

✅ White-label exports
Look for:

• PDF reports
• logos/colors
• scheduled email delivery
• executive summaries

Suggested agency stack

Premium AI visibility offering

• Profound or Peec AI → AI SOV tracking
• Looker Studio → custom dashboards
• Google Slides → polished monthly decks

SEO + AI package

• Semrush/Ahrefs → SEO reporting
• Peec AI/Otterly → AI visibility layer
• Looker Studio → client portal

If you manage 10+ clients, I’d lean toward Peec AI or Profound. If you manage hundreds of SMB retainers, I’d look harder at Semrush + an AI visibility add-on workflow.

If your priority is multi-client AI share-of-voice + agency-friendly reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

Peec AI for agencies

Peec is unusually well aligned with your exact workflow: one account can manage multiple clients, with daily tracking of mention rate, position, citations, sentiment and share of voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. peec.ai

The reporting side is particularly attractive for agencies:

• Branded client dashboards via Looker Studio
• Clients can access dashboards without a Peec login
• CSV + API exports for your own reporting stack
• Automated reporting through its MCP integration
• Can generate client summaries and compile them into Google Slides decks
• Unlimited client/team seats on its agency plans
• Separate pitch projects, useful for demonstrating AI visibility to prospects before they become clients peec.ai

That makes it my first choice if you're selling an ongoing "AI visibility/SOV monitoring" service rather than merely doing one-off audits.

🥈 OtterlyAI — best if cost matters

OtterlyAI

I'd look at Otterly if you have lots of smaller clients and want to keep software costs low. It supports multi-client workspaces and tracks a broad set of AI/search surfaces. Independent 2026 comparisons specifically highlight it as an agency-friendly, lower-cost option with white-label reporting. www.therankmasters.com

Tradeoff: I'd choose Peec when the sophistication of SOV/competitive analysis and reporting workflow matters more than minimizing the subscription.

🥉 Profound — best for serious enterprise clients

Profound

Profound is the one I'd demo if your clients are large brands with substantial budgets and expect deeper AI-search intelligence rather than a simple visibility score. It is frequently positioned as the enterprise end of the market, with deeper visibility, competitive and citation analysis. www.workduo.ai

The downside for an agency is economics: it can make less sense when you're managing many SMB/mid-market accounts.

What I'd actually test

I'd run the same 30–50 prompts for 2–3 representative clients through Peec, Otterly and Profound and judge:

1. SOV methodology — does their definition of SOV actually make sense?
2. Prompt-level competitor gaps — can you see why Client A lost to Competitor B?
3. Citation/source data — can you turn the report into an actual content/PR plan?
4. Historical trends — can you show meaningful month-over-month improvement?
5. Client presentation — can an account manager send the report without rebuilding it in Canva/Slides?
6. Data export/API — can you pipe everything into your agency's master dashboard?
7. Cost per client — especially important once you have 20, 50, or 100 clients.

One important caveat: don't obsess over a single SOV percentage. AI answers are probabilistic and your tracked prompt set can materially change the number; trend + competitor comparison + prompt-level evidence is much more defensible to clients. www.reddit.com

Bottom line:

• 5–50 clients / want the best agency workflow → Peec
• Lots of smaller clients / price-sensitive → OtterlyAI
• Enterprise brands / deepest intelligence → Profound
• Technical GEO/AEO consultancy → Scrunch
• Already heavily invested in SEO tooling → Semrush

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to track (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you need PDF/PowerPoint reports or live white-label dashboards, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their current pricing.

If your priorities are agency-scale multi-client tracking + share of voice + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

🥇 My pick: Peec AI

Peec AI is probably the strongest fit if you're running a real agency rather than just monitoring your own brand.

It explicitly supports agency projects, competitor benchmarking, share of voice, visibility, position and sentiment. Its agency workflow also supports free prospect/pitch projects that can be converted into client projects. peec.ai

The particularly useful part for reporting is that Peec can feed data into Looker Studio, with CSV/API access for other BI/reporting systems. It also offers MCP automation that can generate per-client summaries and even one-slide-per-client decks. peec.ai

Peec AI for Agencies

🥈 Best if the deliverable is the report itself: Rankfender

Rankfender is unusually focused on the agency reporting layer.

It offers white-label reports with your logo/colors/cover, scheduled weekly or monthly delivery, client portals, competitive share of voice, AI-system breakdowns, KPI trends, and PDF export. rankfender.com

If your workflow is basically:

Track 20–100 clients → automatically generate branded monthly PDF → send to client

I'd seriously consider Rankfender over a more analytics-heavy platform.

Rankfender Reports & Analytics

🥉 Spyglasses — interesting agency-first alternative

Spyglasses is built explicitly around agencies. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity, provides white-label reporting, prospecting previews, per-client usage reporting, and CSV exports. www.spyglasses.io

That makes it particularly interesting if you're worried about attributing AI-query costs/usage to individual clients rather than just looking at aggregate visibility.

Spyglasses for Agencies

What I'd choose by agency type

• 5–20 clients, want the best overall system: Peec AI
• 20–100+ clients, reporting is the bottleneck: Rankfender
• Need detailed client-level usage/cost allocation: Spyglasses
• Want to build your own dashboards/reporting stack: Peec AI or Omnia
• Want something lightweight and client-friendly: AnswerPeek

One important caveat: don't treat AI share-of-voice as an absolute measurement like Google Search Console impressions. LLM responses are stochastic, so the same prompt can produce different answers at different times. Recent research specifically finds substantial variability in AI citation/visibility measurements. arxiv.org For client reports, I'd therefore emphasize trends, competitor deltas, prompt-level evidence, and methodology, rather than claiming something like "you own 34.7% of all AI search."

If you tell me roughly how many clients you need to track (e.g. 10, 50, 200) and whether you want PDF/Slides vs. live dashboards, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare current pricing.

If you're an agency managing multiple brands, I'd prioritize multi-client management, repeatable prompt sets, white-label reporting, and polished exports over raw AI visibility features. Those are the capabilities that keep reporting scalable.

Here's how I'd rank the current options:

My recommendations

For most agencies (5–100 clients): AnswerMap

It feels closest to "set it and forget it."

Pros:

• Weekly automated reports
• White-labeled PDFs
• Tracks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity
• Competitor share of voice
• Built specifically around agency delivery rather than enterprise analytics www.answermap.co

If your clients mainly care about receiving polished reports every month, this is probably the strongest fit.

For premium agencies: Geneo

If you're charging $2k–10k/month retainers, Geneo stands out because it includes:

• Branded client portal
• Custom domain
• Downloadable executive reports
• Share of voice
• Citation tracking
• Google AI Overviews alongside LLMs geneo.app

It looks much more like your own software than a third-party tool.

For agencies already using BI tools

SOV Tracker is attractive because it adds:

• API
• CSV exports
• Looker Studio integration
• White-label dashboard
• Higher scan limits for agency plans sovtracker.com

If you already build custom client dashboards, this saves work.

Enterprise option

If you're working with Fortune 500 clients, also evaluate Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit. It integrates AI visibility with traditional SEO, backlinks, rankings, and audits, making it appealing if your agency already runs on Semrush. It's more comprehensive but also more expensive and less focused on white-label reporting than the agency-first tools. www.techradar.com

What I'd use

• Best overall agency platform: AnswerMap
• Best white-label experience: Geneo
• Best for custom reporting: SOV Tracker
• Best lightweight option: AISoV
• Best enterprise SEO integration: Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

One capability I'd insist on regardless of platform is the ability to save reusable prompt libraries (by industry or client type). That lets every client be measured against the same prompt set month after month, making share-of-voice trends far more meaningful than one-off snapshots.

If you're an agency managing multiple clients, I'd prioritize these criteria over raw tracking accuracy (because every AI visibility tool has some variability): multi-client workspaces, repeatable prompt sets, scheduled reporting, branded exports, APIs, and executive-ready dashboards.

Here's how I'd rank the strongest options today.

My top recommendations

For agencies with 10–100 clients

1. Lantern

• Best multi-client dashboard
• AI citation tracking
• Competitive share of voice
• Agency workflow focus
• Executive-ready reports
• Scales well across account teams www.asklantern.comsov.braign.io

2. AISoV

• Probably the simplest reporting workflow
• Separate client reports
• Shareable links
• HTML exports
• Reusable prompt templates
• Minimal setup overhead sov.braign.io

3. Brandofy

• Built specifically for agencies
• Weekly automated audits
• Strong client-facing reports
• Good account isolation brandofy.ai

If polished reports matter most

I'd look for software that includes:

• Executive summary page
• Trend charts
• Share of voice over time
• AI citations
• Competitor comparisons
• Prompt-level evidence
• PDF/HTML export
• Scheduled email reports
• White labeling

Most agencies find that simply exporting charts isn't enough—clients want to see the actual AI responses and cited sources alongside the metrics. Tools like AISoV and Lantern emphasize keeping that evidence attached to reports, which helps explain why a score changed. www.asklantern.comsov.braign.io

If you already use SEO platforms

Instead of adding a completely separate stack:

• Semrush + AI Visibility Toolkit
• Ahrefs + Brand Radar
• Looker Studio + SOV Tracker API

can create a unified monthly client report.

My overall ranking for agencies

1. Lantern ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2. AISoV ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
3. Brandofy ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆
4. Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆
5. SOV Tracker ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆
6. Profound (enterprise) ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆

One important note: AI share-of-voice is still an emerging metric. Agencies reporting it successfully usually combine it with business outcomes such as AI referral traffic, branded search growth, and conversions rather than treating SOV as a standalone KPI. Industry discussions consistently emphasize showing trends over time and tying visibility improvements to measurable business impact. www.reddit.com

If you're running an SEO or GEO agency with 20+ clients, I can also recommend the best stack specifically for automated white-label monthly reporting (including integrations with Looker Studio, AgencyAnalytics, or custom dashboards).

If you're an agency managing 10–100+ clients, the biggest differentiators are:

• Multi-client workspaces
• White-label/client-ready reporting
• Scheduled PDF exports
• Prompt-level share of voice tracking
• Competitor benchmarking
• API or Looker/BI integrations

Here's how I'd rank the current market.

My top recommendations

1. Profound

Best for agencies serving enterprise brands.

Pros:

• Deep competitive intelligence
• Tracks citations and narratives
• Executive dashboards
• Excellent historical trend analysis

Cons:

• Expensive
• Overkill for SMB clients

2. Peec AI

Probably the best balance today.

Good at:

• AI Share of Voice
• ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity monitoring
• Competitor comparisons
• Client dashboards

Popular with SEO agencies because it's easier to scale than enterprise platforms. www.ai-visibility-software.com

3. Mentions

If polished client reporting is the priority, this stands out.

Agency features include:

• Unlimited client sites (Agency tier)
• White-label reports
• Client portals
• AI traffic reporting
• Visibility trends
• Sentiment
• Share of voice
• Exact AI answers and citations

Recent independent testing highlighted it as especially agency-friendly. www.techradar.com

4. Rankfender

If your agency spends hours in Google Slides every month, Rankfender deserves a look.

Highlights:

• Fully branded reports
• Automatic weekly/monthly delivery
• PDF exports
• Client portals
• AI visibility KPIs
• GSC + GA4 integrations

Its reporting workflow is a major selling point. rankfender.com

5. AISoV

A great fit if you want straightforward AI share-of-voice measurement without a lot of extra features.

Strengths:

• Same prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini
• Competitor comparisons
• Citation review
• HTML exports
• Separate reports per client

It's simple but effective for recurring client reviews. sov.braign.io

What agencies should include in reports

The agencies getting the best client retention generally report more than just a single "AI visibility score." Common monthly KPIs include:

• AI Share of Voice (%)
• Brand mention rate
• Competitor comparison
• Prompt coverage
• Citation frequency
• Most-cited pages
• AI referral traffic
• Visibility trend over time
• Key wins/losses since last month

Practitioners consistently recommend focusing on trend lines and business impact rather than one-off AI responses, which can vary from run to run. arxiv.org

If I were building an agency stack

Small agency (5–20 clients):

• Peec AI
• AISoV
• Looker Studio for custom dashboards

Growing agency (20–75 clients):

• Mentions
• Rankfender
• Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit (if you're already using Semrush)

Enterprise agency (100+ clients):

• Profound
• Semrush Enterprise
• Custom BI dashboards (Looker or Power BI)

That combination offers the strongest mix of scalable client management, automated reporting, and executive-friendly deliverables.

If you're an agency managing multiple clients, you likely need three things:

1. AI visibility tracking (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc.)
2. Multi-client dashboards and white-label reporting
3. Polished exports (PDF, scheduled reports, Looker Studio, PowerPoint, CSV)

Here's how the leading platforms compare.

Best overall: Profound

Profound is currently one of the strongest dedicated AI search analytics platforms.

Strengths:

• Tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and other AI assistants
• Measures AI Share of Voice over time
• Competitor benchmarking
• Prompt monitoring
• Multi-client workspaces
• Executive-ready reporting
• API for custom dashboards

Ideal for agencies serving enterprise or mid-market clients.

Best value: Peec AI

Peec AI has become popular among SEO agencies because it's focused on AI search rather than traditional rankings.

Features include:

• AI visibility tracking
• Competitor comparisons
• Prompt-level analysis
• Client dashboards
• PDF exports
• Affordable pricing compared with enterprise tools

Best if you're already using Semrush

Semrush has been expanding into AI search visibility alongside its traditional SEO toolkit.

Advantages:

• Existing client management
• White-label PDFs
• Scheduled reporting
• SEO + AI insights in one platform
• Agency workflows already built in

If your agency already runs on Semrush, adding AI reporting is often easier than introducing a separate platform.

Best reporting

If polished reports are your highest priority:

• Semrush — excellent white-label reporting
• SE Ranking — very strong agency reporting
• Profound — executive dashboards
• BrightEdge — enterprise reporting
• Goodie — modern client dashboards

If you manage 20–100 clients

A common stack looks like:

• AI visibility: Profound or Peec AI
• SEO reporting: Semrush or SE Ranking
• Custom executive dashboards: Looker Studio or Power BI
• Monthly PDFs: Automated white-label reports

This combination gives clients a view of:

• AI Share of Voice
• Brand mentions in AI answers
• Competitor comparisons
• Traditional SEO rankings
• Organic traffic
• AI referral traffic
• Month-over-month changes

My recommendation by agency size

• 1–10 clients: Peec AI + SE Ranking
• 10–50 clients: Profound + Semrush
• 50–500+ clients: Profound or BrightEdge with custom BI dashboards
• Enterprise digital agency: Scrunch AI or BrightEdge

For agencies that want to differentiate themselves with "AI SEO" services today, Profound and Peec AI are among the strongest dedicated options, while Semrush remains the most mature choice if you also need comprehensive SEO management and client reporting in a single platform.

If you're an agency managing multiple client accounts, the biggest differentiators are:

• Multi-client workspaces
• AI share of voice (not just rankings)
• Cross-model tracking (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.)
• White-label or polished PDF reporting
• Scheduled exports
• Competitive benchmarking

Here's how I'd break down the current market.

1. Rankfender (my top agency recommendation)

Best if your agency's deliverable is a recurring "AI Visibility Report."

Pros:

• White-label PDFs
• Agency branding
• Scheduled reports
• Competitive Share of Voice
• GA4 + GSC integrations
• Client portals
• Monthly automation

It feels built around agency workflows rather than SEO teams. rankfender.com

2. AISoV

Probably the cleanest reporting experience if you primarily care about AI mentions.

Tracks:

• ChatGPT
• Claude
• Gemini

Reports include:

• Share of voice
• Competitor mentions
• Citation sources
• Prompt-by-prompt results
• HTML export
• Shareable links
• Separate reports per client sov.braign.iorankfender.com

Good fit for boutique SEO and GEO agencies.

3. Geneo

More of an agency platform than just reporting.

Highlights:

• Custom domain
• White-label client portal
• Agency branding
• Downloadable reports
• Share of Voice
• Citation tracking
• Google AI Overviews
• ChatGPT
• Perplexity geneo.apprankfender.com

If clients log in themselves, this is attractive.

4. AnswerMap

Interesting because it automates almost everything.

It:

• Generates prompts automatically
• Runs weekly
• Creates agency-branded PDFs
• Emails reports
• Tracks Share of Voice
• Measures sentiment

Very little manual work each month. www.answermap.co

5. Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Worth considering only if you're already deep into Semrush.

Advantages:

• AI visibility beside SEO data
• Brand perception analysis
• Existing client dashboards

Weakness:

• Not agency-first
• Less polished white-label reporting
• More expensive for dedicated AI visibility monitoring www.techradar.com

If I were building an agency stack

Boutique agency (5–30 clients)

• AISoV
• Looker Studio
• GA4
• GSC

Simple, affordable, and easy to explain to clients.

Growth agency (30–100 clients)

• Rankfender
• BigQuery
• Looker Studio
• GA4
• GSC

Automated reporting with strong branding.

Premium GEO/AI-search agency

• Geneo or Rankfender
• Semrush
• Ahrefs
• Custom Looker Studio dashboards

This gives clients both AI visibility metrics and traditional SEO context.

What I'd prioritize before buying

1. Support for all the AI platforms your clients care about (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.).
2. Prompt-set versioning so monthly reports are comparable over time.
3. White-label PDF exports with your agency branding.
4. Scheduled report delivery.
5. Multi-client workspaces with role-based access.
6. Visibility into why a brand was or wasn't mentioned, including citations and underlying responses.

For an agency whose product is AI visibility reporting, Rankfender and Geneo currently stand out for polished client deliverables, while AISoV offers a streamlined workflow that's easy to roll out across many accounts. geneo.apprankfender.com