ChatGPT answers, unedited

If your core requirement is “one place to aggregate AI-assistant visibility across clients/regions and turn it into polished client reporting,” I’d shortlist these:

• AgencyAnalytics — best fit if you already run agency reporting there. Its AI Tracker puts AI visibility alongside SEO, PPC, social, GA, Search Console, etc., and supports client-ready/white-label reporting. It currently tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. AgencyAnalytics
• Zumi — strongest agency-native option for multi-client GEO. It offers separate client workspaces, white-label reports, competitor tracking, and coverage of up to nine AI engines. Zumi
• Promptwatch — worth considering for a more analytics-heavy agency setup. It supports multi-client management, white-label dashboards, API/MCP access, Data Studio, and client portals. Promptwatch
• RISN AI — interesting if you want broad engine coverage. It advertises 8+ AI engines, unlimited brands, competitive benchmarking, and client-level reporting. RISN AI
• AgencyScope — particularly interesting if the deliverable is the report itself. It focuses on recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini and produces white-label PDFs with prompt-level evidence. AgencyScope AgencyScope

For your specific use case

I'd distinguish “AI visibility tracker” from “agency analytics/reporting layer.”

If you need regional aggregation, I'd make this a hard evaluation criterion rather than assuming that a platform's “multi-client” capability means geographic segmentation. You want to be able to structure something like:

Client → country → city/market → language → prompt set → AI assistant → visibility/share of voice → competitors → citations → trend

That's important because AI answers can vary substantially by platform and market. A 2026 study covering 12 U.S. cities found only 4.6% of recommended businesses were named by all four major assistants, illustrating why a single aggregate “AI visibility score” can hide meaningful regional differences. Visibility Index

My practical shortlist would therefore be:

1. AgencyAnalytics if the agency already has a broad client-reporting stack and wants AI visibility integrated into it.
2. Zumi if AI/GEO visibility itself is becoming a major agency service and you need multi-client + multi-engine + white-label workflows.
3. Promptwatch if API/data integration and deeper analytics matter more than simply producing PDFs.
4. AgencyScope if your primary pain is turning repeatable AI checks into credible monthly client deliverables.

If you tell me roughly how many clients/regions you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 10 countries), I can narrow this to the 2–3 platforms that fit that scale and compare pricing, regional tracking, engines, API, white-labeling, and reporting.

For an agency, I’d shortlist agencyanalytics.com first. It combines multi-client management, regional prompt execution, competitor benchmarking, and client reporting inside an existing agency reporting platform. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. AgencyAnalytics AgencyAnalytics

Other strong fits:

• AgencyScope — particularly focused on white-label, client-ready PDF reporting; supports recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. AgencyScope
• Tower GEO — agency-oriented multi-client workspaces, competitive visibility, sentiment/citations and white-label dashboards/reports. Tower GEO
• GetMentioned — interesting if geographic targeting is central; explicitly supports multi-market agency monitoring. getmentioned.co

My practical split: AgencyAnalytics for an agency already doing SEO/PPC reporting; AgencyScope if polished white-label deliverables are the primary requirement.

If your agency needs to aggregate AI-assistant visibility across regions and turn it into client-ready analytics, I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation: Promptwatch

For your exact requirement, Promptwatch looks closest to the sweet spot. It explicitly supports agencies managing multiple clients, tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and other engines, and supports locations/languages, white-label dashboards, APIs and Data Studio. Promptwatch

That matters because "AI visibility" isn't a single global number. Recent research shows substantial differences between AI assistants even for identical local-business queries, so a serious agency product should let you slice results by client → market → language → assistant → prompt → competitor → citation/source. Visibility Index

If your priority is client reporting

I'd actually look at AgencyScope. It is deliberately narrower: recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, then polished white-label PDFs with prompt-level evidence. That makes it particularly attractive if your agency already has the strategy/SEO stack and just needs a repeatable AI-visibility reporting layer. AgencyScope AgencyScope

If you're already using AgencyAnalytics

Then AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker deserves serious consideration. Its differentiator is that AI visibility sits alongside the client's existing SEO, PPC, social, traffic and revenue data, rather than creating another standalone reporting silo. It covers ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini. AgencyAnalytics

Bottom line:

• Best overall for multi-region/multi-client GEO: Promptwatch
• Best for agency-branded deliverables: AgencyScope
• Best if you already run AgencyAnalytics: AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker
• Best for a more GEO/action-oriented workflow: Llumo or Promptrack

If you're evaluating these for an agency purchase, I can also make you a feature/pricing comparison of the top 5 specifically around regional tracking, number of AI engines, API access, white-labeling, Looker/Data Studio integration, and per-client economics.

For your exact requirement, Promptwatch looks closest to the sweet spot. It explicitly supports agencies managing multiple clients, tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and other engines, and supports locations/languages, white-label dashboards, APIs and Data Studio. Promptwatch

That matters because "AI visibility" isn't a single global number. Recent research shows substantial differences between AI assistants even for identical local-business queries, so a serious agency product should let you slice results by client → market → language → assistant → prompt → competitor → citation/source. visibilityindex.ai

If your priority is client reporting

I'd actually look at AgencyScope. It is deliberately narrower: recurring checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, then polished white-label PDFs with prompt-level evidence. That makes it particularly attractive if your agency already has the strategy/SEO stack and just needs a repeatable AI-visibility reporting layer.

If you're already using AgencyAnalytics

If your use case is an agency managing multiple clients, regions, and AI assistants and then turning the data into client-ready reporting, my shortlist would be:

My pick

For a conventional SEO/digital agency: AgencyAnalytics.

The important differentiator isn't simply "how many LLMs does it track?" It's that the AI data sits alongside the SEO, traffic, PPC, social and revenue story you already show clients. That makes it much easier to turn AI visibility into a recurring agency deliverable rather than another standalone dashboard. AgencyAnalytics

For an agency where GEO/AEO itself is the product: I'd evaluate Peec and Profound first. They're more specialized analytics platforms, whereas AgencyAnalytics is strongest as the reporting layer around your broader marketing operation.

One thing I'd verify before buying

If "across regions" means genuinely localized AI results—e.g. US vs UK vs Germany vs UAE, not merely filtering a dashboard by country—make geo-specific query execution a hard requirement. AI answers can vary by model, language, location and prompt, so a global visibility score can hide meaningful regional differences.

For your exact use case, I'd rank the requirements:

1. Multi-client portfolio management
2. Country/language/location-level tracking
3. ChatGPT + Gemini + Perplexity + Google AI Overviews/AI Mode
4. Competitor/share-of-voice analysis
5. Historical trend data
6. White-label dashboards/PDFs
7. API/export capability
8. Prompt-level evidence so an account manager can explain why the score changed

If you tell me roughly how many clients (10 / 50 / 500+) and how many regions per client, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare their pricing/unit economics for an agency.

For a conventional SEO/digital agency: AgencyAnalytics.

The important differentiator isn't simply "how many LLMs does it track?" It's that the AI data sits alongside the SEO, traffic, PPC, social and revenue story you already show clients. That makes it much easier to turn AI visibility into a recurring agency deliverable rather than another standalone dashboard. AgencyAnalytics

For an agency where GEO/AEO itself is the product: I'd evaluate Peec and Profound first. They're more specialized analytics platforms, whereas AgencyAnalytics is strongest as the reporting layer around your broader marketing operation.

One thing I'd verify before buying

If "across regions" means genuinely localized AI results—e.g. US vs UK vs Germany vs UAE, not merely filtering a dashboard by country—make geo-specific query execution a hard requirement. AI answers can vary by model, language, location and prompt, so a global visibility score can hide meaningful regional differences.

For your exact use case, I'd rank the requirements:

1. Multi-client portfolio management
2. Country/language/location-level tracking
3. ChatGPT + Gemini + Perplexity + Google AI Overviews/AI Mode
4. Competitor/share-of-voice analysis
5. Historical trend data
6. White-label dashboards/PDFs
7. API/export capability
8. Prompt-level evidence so an account manager can explain why the score changed

If you tell me roughly how many clients (10 / 50 / 500+) and how many regions per client, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare their pricing/unit economics for an agency.

If your priority is one agency-level system that aggregates AI-assistant visibility across regions and turns it into client-ready reporting, I’d shortlist these:

Peec is particularly interesting for your use case because multilingual/International visibility is a stated differentiator, while recent agency comparisons identify it as especially suited to geo-targeted AI-search monitoring. AI Search Tools About Martech

My recommendation

1. Peec AI — if “across regions” means different countries/cities/languages.
I'd start here. You want to be able to answer questions like:

“How visible is Client X in ChatGPT for buyers in New York vs. London vs. Singapore?”

rather than just “How often is Client X mentioned?”

2. Promptwatch — if you want to productize the service.
It offers agency-oriented multi-client management, white-label dashboards, client portals, API/MCP access and reporting. Promptwatch

3. Profound — if clients are large enterprises and analytics depth matters more than cost.
It has particularly strong AI-search analytics, including prompt and citation intelligence, but is positioned at the premium end. AI Search Tools

There are also newer agency-native products worth testing, such as Zumi, which explicitly offers unlimited clients, isolated client workspaces and white-label reports. Zumi

What I'd require before buying

For an agency, don't evaluate these merely on “number of AI engines.” I'd insist on:

• Location-specific prompting — country, city, language, ideally proxy/market simulation
• Multiple models — ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI surfaces
• Share of voice against competitors
• Citation/source tracking — why the assistant recommends a client
• Historical trends rather than snapshots
• Client-level workspaces
• White-label dashboards/PDFs
• Automated recurring reports
• Raw response evidence so account managers can defend the numbers
• API/export so you can combine AI visibility with SEO, GA4, CRM and business KPIs

That last point is increasingly important: the useful agency deliverable isn't “your AI visibility score.” It's something like visibility → competitors → cited sources → regional differences → recommended actions → business outcome.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and which regions you care about, I can narrow this to the 2–3 strongest options and compare pricing/unit economics.

“How visible is Client X in ChatGPT for buyers in New York vs. London vs. Singapore?”

rather than just “How often is Client X mentioned?”

2. Promptwatch — if you want to productize the service.
It offers agency-oriented multi-client management, white-label dashboards, client portals, API/MCP access and reporting.

3. Profound — if clients are large enterprises and analytics depth matters more than cost.
It has particularly strong AI-search analytics, including prompt and citation intelligence, but is positioned at the premium end.

If your core requirement is agency-scale AI assistant visibility tracking across regions + client-ready reporting, I’d shortlist these:

• AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — best overall for established agencies. It plugs AI visibility directly into the same reporting environment as SEO, PPC, social, traffic, and revenue. It tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, with competitor benchmarking and client-ready reports. AgencyAnalytics
• FoundGeo — best if regional/engine breadth is the priority. It advertises tracking across 9 AI engines, per-model visibility, ongoing monitoring, branded reports, and an API for pulling results into your own dashboards. FoundGeo
• Tower GEO — best agency-native GEO platform. It supports multi-client management, ChatGPT/Claude/Perplexity/Gemini, competitive benchmarking, sentiment/citation tracking, and white-label dashboards/PDFs. Tower GEO
• AgencyScope — best if the deliverable is primarily a polished monthly PDF. It is deliberately focused on recurring ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini checks, prompt-level evidence, competitor comparisons, and white-label PDF reporting. AgencyScope AgencyScope
• Scope — worth considering for a simpler multi-client dashboard. It supports separate client tracking across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, although it explicitly says it doesn't offer white-labeling. Scope

My pick

For a typical SEO/digital agency with dozens of clients, I'd start with AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker because it solves the bigger agency problem: AI visibility becomes another channel in the existing client reporting stack, rather than creating yet another standalone dashboard. AgencyAnalytics

If by “across regions” you specifically mean something like:

Client → country → city/market → prompt set → ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity → share of voice → competitors → trend → branded client report

then I'd investigate FoundGeo and Tower GEO more closely. Regional granularity is an important differentiator; merely supporting multiple AI assistants isn't enough.

One other important consideration: don't choose based on “AI visibility score” alone. For agency reporting, I'd require prompt-level evidence, competitor share of voice, citation/source analysis, repeat measurements, geographic segmentation, and export/API access. AI answers can vary substantially between runs, so a single score without the underlying evidence can be difficult to defend in a client meeting. Demand Local, Inc. Sapian Metrics

If you tell me how many clients/locations you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 50 cities), I can narrow this to the top 2–3 platforms and compare pricing, geo granularity, API, white-labeling, and reporting.

If you mean an agency tool that can monitor how clients appear in ChatGPT/Gemini/Claude/Perplexity across markets and turn that into polished client reporting, the strongest options currently fall into a few buckets:

My shortlist by agency type

• SEO agency adding “AI visibility” as a new retainer deliverable:

→ agencyscope.ai or agencyanalytics.com

• Large agency managing dozens/hundreds of client brands:

→ towergeo.com or scope.online

• Agency wanting a board-ready monthly PDF/reporting product:

→ agencyscope.ai is particularly aligned with that workflow.

• Agency wanting to sell “AI search optimization” rather than just measurement:

→ getintel.ai is closer to a measurement + action workflow.

Features I’d prioritize before choosing

1. Regional segmentation

• Country/city-specific prompts
• Language variations
• Local competitor sets
• Prompt portfolio management

• Save buyer-intent queries per client
• Track changes over time
• Separate branded vs non-branded discovery prompts
• Evidence-based reporting

• Actual AI responses
• Sources/citations used by models
• Competitor comparisons
• Agency delivery

• White-label PDFs
• Client portals
• Multiple client workspaces
• Scheduled reports
• API/export capability

• Important if you want to combine AI visibility with SEO, CRM, revenue, or PR metrics.

For most agencies starting this service line, I’d test AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker if you already have an SEO reporting stack, and AgencyScope if the core product you sell is “AI visibility reporting.” agencyanalytics.com agencyscope.ai

If you mean one platform an agency can use across many clients, regions, and AI assistants—and then turn the data into polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

1. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — best overall for established agencies. It puts AI visibility alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic, and revenue reporting, and tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and AI Mode. It also supports portfolio-level client reporting. AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

2. Peec AI — best for deeper AI-visibility analytics. Strong fit if you want visibility/share-of-voice, sentiment, competitive analysis, and automated reporting workflows across a client portfolio. Its MCP workflow can generate per-client summaries and decks automatically. Peec AI

peec.ai

3. Zumi — best if white-labeling and regional/multi-client management are priorities. It offers separate client workspaces, tracked query sets and competitors, agency-branded exports, and coverage of up to nine AI engines. Zumi

zumihq.com

4. Profound — best for enterprise/large-scale GEO intelligence. I’d consider it when clients need sophisticated citation/source analysis and broader AI-engine coverage rather than simply a monthly visibility score. Industry comparisons currently put it toward the enterprise end of the market. Opttab
5. Seerly — best for evidence-backed client reporting. Particularly interesting if clients will challenge the numbers: reports can expose the underlying AI response, citations, sentiment, competitive position, and time-series comparisons, with agency branding. Seerly

My pick

For a typical SEO/GEO agency, I'd start with AgencyAnalytics if you already use it for client reporting. The killer feature is not merely tracking AI mentions; it's putting AI visibility + traditional search + traffic/revenue in the same client-facing reporting layer. AgencyAnalytics

If your core product is specifically “AI visibility intelligence” rather than broader digital marketing reporting, I'd choose Peec AI or Zumi.

One important caveat: “across regions” is the feature I'd scrutinize most heavily in demos. Don't just ask whether they support multiple countries. Ask whether the same prompt can be measured with country/location/language-specific context, consistently over time, and whether the resulting regional data can be rolled up into an agency-wide view. AI answers can vary substantially by geography, so a global aggregate can otherwise be misleading.

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and whether you need white-label dashboards/PDFs, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, regional tracking, engines, APIs, and reporting.

If your priority is agency-scale AI assistant visibility across regions + client-ready analytics, my top pick right now is Profound.

My shortlist

1. Profound — best overall for your use case

Profound is the one I'd evaluate first if "across regions" is a core requirement rather than a nice-to-have.

It supports region-based prompting across 80+ countries, with country-level analysis out of the box and the ability to go down to state/province/city level. Profound Profound

It also lets you segment visibility by platform, region, topic, persona and prompt, which is useful when you need to turn a giant client dataset into something an account team can actually explain. Profound

For reporting, Profound supports customizable dashboards with Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, plus saved regional filters and PDF/public-link sharing. Profound

Why I'd pick it: you can answer questions like:

"How visible is Client X in ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity in the US vs UK vs Germany, and which competitors are winning those markets?"

rather than simply:

"Did ChatGPT mention Client X?"

That's a materially better agency product.

tryprofound.com

2. AgencyAnalytics — best if you're already an agency reporting shop

If your agency already uses AgencyAnalytics, I'd seriously consider its AI Tracker before adding another platform.

It tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini, and—importantly for agencies—puts that data alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic and revenue data. AgencyAnalytics

It also supports automated client dashboards/reports and white-label reporting. AgencyAnalytics

So I'd choose:

• Profound → if geographic/AI-search analytics is the differentiator.
• AgencyAnalytics → if consolidated agency reporting is the differentiator.

3. Peec AI — best middle ground

Peec is worth testing if you want something less enterprise-heavy than Profound but more analytics-oriented than a basic prompt monitor. Recent comparisons consistently position it as a strong option for agencies and multi-brand teams. Bloomiro TrendlyAI Blog

One interesting specialist option

If your clients are heavily local/multi-location/franchise, I'd also look at Spyglasses. It explicitly runs the same prompts by city or country and rolls those markets into a parent dashboard, including share-of-voice comparisons by location. Spyglasses

That's potentially more directly aligned with a franchise/local SEO agency than a generic enterprise AEO platform.

My recommendation

For an agency building a sellable AI visibility reporting service, I'd shortlist:

Profound → AgencyAnalytics → Spyglasses

And I'd evaluate them on five things before buying:

1. True geographic execution — does it actually query AI from the target geography, or merely tag a prompt "UK"?
2. Prompt volume at agency scale — cost when you have 50 clients × 50 prompts × multiple markets.
3. Citation-level evidence — clients will eventually ask "Why did the AI say that?"
4. White-label/API/report automation — critical if this becomes a recurring retainer deliverable.
5. Cross-client aggregation — can you see your entire portfolio without manually opening 50 accounts?

Profound is the strongest match if regional fidelity is the #1 requirement; AgencyAnalytics is the strongest match if your ultimate goal is putting AI visibility into the same polished client reporting stack as SEO/PPC. Profound AgencyAnalytics

That's potentially more directly aligned with a franchise/local SEO agency than a generic enterprise AEO platform.

My recommendation

For an agency building a sellable AI visibility reporting service, I'd shortlist:

Profound → AgencyAnalytics → Spyglasses

And I'd evaluate them on five things before buying:

For reporting, Profound supports customizable dashboards with Visibility Score, Share of Voice, Average Position and Citation Rank, plus saved regional filters and PDF/public-link sharing. Profound

Why I'd pick it: you can answer questions like:

"How visible is Client X in ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity in the US vs UK vs Germany, and which competitors are winning those markets?"

rather than simply:

"Did ChatGPT mention Client X?"

That's a materially better agency product.

tryprofound.com

2. AgencyAnalytics — best if you're already an agency reporting shop

If your agency already uses AgencyAnalytics, I'd seriously consider its AI Tracker before adding another platform.

It tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini, and—importantly for agencies—puts that data alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic and revenue data.

It also supports automated client dashboards/reports and white-label reporting.

So I'd choose:

If you mean AI assistant visibility as in “how often a client’s brand appears in ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc., across markets/regions, with agency-grade reporting,” the strongest options right now are:

My shortlist by agency type

• 50+ clients, enterprise SEO agency: AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker or Gumshoe
• Selling GEO/AEO as a new retainer: Zumi, RISN AI, or Seerly
• Need white-label PDFs/QBR decks quickly: AgencyScope or Zumi AgencyScope Zumi
• Need raw data pipelines into your own BI stack: Gumshoe or Peec AI because of export/API-style workflows. Gumshoe AI Peec AI

For regional reporting, make sure the tool supports:

• Region/country-specific prompts (e.g., “best dentist in Toronto” vs “best dentist in Chicago”)
• Local competitor sets
• Multiple languages
• Separate client workspaces
• Prompt history and answer snapshots (important because AI outputs change)
• Citation/source tracking
• White-label exports
• API access if you want to merge with Looker Studio, Tableau, Power BI, or your own portal

A practical agency stack is often:

1. AI visibility tracker → collect mentions, citations, share of voice
2. BI/reporting layer → client dashboards
3. Your strategy layer → recommendations, content briefs, GEO actions

If you’re building this as an agency productized service (e.g., “AI visibility monitoring for 100 local businesses”), I’d prioritize multi-client management + white-label reporting over raw tracking depth.

If your priority is agency-scale AI assistant visibility across regions + client-ready reporting, my shortlist would be:

1. agencyanalytics.com — best overall for agencies

• Tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode.
• Multi-client portfolio management.
• Competitor benchmarking, citations, share of voice and trends.
• Particularly strong if you already use AgencyAnalytics for SEO/PPC/social reporting because AI visibility sits alongside those metrics.
• White-label client reporting is built in. AgencyAnalytics
• menra.ai — strongest fit if regional visibility is the key requirement

• Tracks nine AI platforms, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews.
• Explicit regional drill-downs including US, EU, MENA and Southeast Asia.
• Daily prompt execution and per-prompt visibility/sentiment/citation analysis. Menra
• I'd investigate this first if you need to answer questions like "How visible is our client's brand in ChatGPT in the US vs. Germany vs. UAE?"
• otterly.ai — strong dedicated AI-search monitoring option

• Broad engine coverage including ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot.
• Good fit when you want visibility monitoring plus GEO-oriented analysis rather than simply adding another reporting widget to an existing SEO stack. KITLabs
• agencyscope.ai — best if polished client PDFs are the main deliverable

• Built specifically around recurring agency reports.
• White-label PDFs, prompt-level evidence and client/competitor configuration.
• Currently focused on ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, so I'd rank it below the above options for broad regional/assistant coverage. AgencyScope

My pick

If you're building an agency-wide reporting system: AgencyAnalytics.

If "across regions" is a hard requirement: Menra deserves the first demo.

The distinction matters because many AI visibility products can show global brand visibility but don't necessarily treat country/region × assistant × prompt as a proper reporting dimension. Menra explicitly advertises regional drill-down, while AgencyAnalytics is stronger as the broader client reporting/agency operating system. Menra AgencyAnalytics

For an agency, I'd want the underlying data model to look roughly like:

Client → Region → AI assistant → Prompt/category → Mention/share of voice → Position → Sentiment → Citation/source → Competitor → Trend

That lets you produce genuinely useful client reporting rather than a vanity metric like "AI visibility = 63%."

If you tell me how many clients/regions you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 10 countries), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare pricing, regional granularity, API access, white-labeling, and reporting.

If your requirement is agency-scale AI assistant visibility + regional tracking + client-ready analytics, I’d shortlist these:

1. agencyanalytics.com — best overall for established agencies.

It puts AI visibility directly alongside SEO/PPC/social reporting, supports ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, handles multiple clients, competitor benchmarking, citations, trends, and client-ready reporting. AgencyAnalytics
Pick this if: you want one reporting system your account managers already understand.

2. promptwatch.com — best for deeper AI-search measurement.

Strong agency workflow with multi-client management, white-label dashboards, API/MCP, Data Studio and client portals. It also tracks citations, AI referral traffic and whether new content starts influencing LLM answers. Promptwatch
Pick this if: you're building a serious GEO/AEO service rather than simply adding an AI KPI to SEO reports.

3. foundgeo.pro — interesting for broad model coverage.

It advertises visibility tracking across 9 AI engines, per-model visibility, competitor comparison, sentiment/framing, API access and branded reports. FoundGeo
Pick this if: breadth of AI-model coverage matters more than integration with an existing reporting stack.

4. towergeo.com — good agency-native option.

It is explicitly designed around multiple clients, competitor benchmarking, sentiment/citations and white-label PDF/live-dashboard reporting. Tower GEO

For your specific requirement: regional visibility

This is where I'd be careful. Many AI-visibility platforms say "multi-client" but don't necessarily give you reliable geo-localized measurement—e.g. "What does ChatGPT recommend for dentists in Chicago vs. Indianapolis vs. Phoenix?"

I'd prioritize a platform that lets you define a matrix like:

Then roll that into regional share of voice, competitor share, citation rate, sentiment, and change over time.

My recommendation

If you're an agency and already use an agency reporting platform → AgencyAnalytics.

If AI visibility itself is becoming a billable GEO service → Promptwatch.

If regional/model coverage is the differentiator you're selling → I'd evaluate FoundGeo/Tower GEO alongside Promptwatch, but explicitly test their geo methodology before buying.

One other option worth watching is datareport.ai, which is unusually focused on putting GEO metrics directly alongside traditional rankings and producing white-label reports; it tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI surfaces. datareport.ai

If you tell me roughly how many clients/locations you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 50 cities), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, API, geo controls, white-labeling, and reporting capabilities.

If your priority is agency-scale aggregation + regional visibility + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

1. agencyanalytics.com — best overall if you already use AgencyAnalytics. It puts AI visibility alongside SEO/PPC/social metrics, supports multiple client accounts, competitor benchmarking, and tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. AgencyAnalytics
2. zumihq.com — strongest fit for multi-region/multi-client GEO. It explicitly supports client workspaces, tracked query sets, competitors, agency-branded exports, and up to nine AI engines. Its regional/multi-market positioning makes it particularly interesting if you're managing franchises, locations, or international clients. Zumi
3. llmpulse.ai — strong reporting-first choice. It has multi-client agency workflows, white-label dashboards, unlimited seats, Looker Studio support, and visibility metrics such as mention rate, share of voice and position-weighted visibility. LLM Pulse
4. getmentioned.co — worth a look for geographically distributed accounts. It specifically advertises geographic targeting, source-level attribution, unlimited competitors and a single dashboard across client brands. GetMentioned
5. agencyscope.ai — best if the deliverable itself is the priority. It focuses heavily on recurring prompt checks and white-label, client-ready PDFs with prompt-level evidence, methodology and regional tagging. AgencyScope

My pick

For a serious agency managing many clients across cities/countries: Zumi.

For an agency already running SEO/PPC reporting and wanting AI visibility folded into the existing client dashboard: AgencyAnalytics.

For a white-label reporting product you can essentially hand to clients: LLM Pulse or AgencyScope.

One important distinction: don't evaluate these purely on the number of AI engines. For regional reporting, I'd test whether they can actually control geography at the prompt/query level (country, city, language, market), maintain consistent query sets over time, and aggregate share of voice + mentions + citation sources + competitor visibility across regions. That's much more valuable than simply saying "we track ChatGPT."

If you tell me roughly how many clients/locations you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 50 locations), I can narrow this to the 2–3 platforms that make the most sense and compare pricing, regional granularity, white-labeling, API/Looker Studio, and scalability.

If your agency needs to aggregate AI-assistant visibility across regions and turn it into client-ready reporting, I’d shortlist these:

1. agencyanalytics.com — best overall for agencies

• Tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini.
• Particularly strong if you already use AgencyAnalytics: AI visibility sits alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic, and revenue data.
• White-label reporting and agency-wide portfolio management are built in. AgencyAnalytics
• My pick if “client-ready analytics” is the priority.
• peec.ai — best dedicated AI-visibility analytics

• Strong multi-brand monitoring and competitor benchmarking.
• Particularly attractive for agencies that want clean AI-search analytics without buying a broader marketing reporting platform.
• Current comparisons specifically identify it as a strong agency/multi-brand choice. Bloomiro Koalr
• tryprofound.com — best for enterprise/global accounts

• More sophisticated AI-search intelligence and citation analysis.
• Better suited when you're managing large multinational clients and need deeper data rather than simply producing monthly visibility reports.
• The tradeoff is cost and complexity. Profound Stork.AI
• otterly.ai — best budget option

• Broad AI-engine coverage at a comparatively low entry point.
• Good if you need to roll AI visibility tracking out across lots of smaller clients without a large platform commitment. Koalr Demand Local, Inc.

For your specific use case

I'd evaluate AgencyAnalytics vs. Peec AI vs. Profound first.

The important distinction is that “regional visibility” needs to mean more than having separate client dashboards. Before buying, verify that the platform lets you segment/query by:

• Country/market
• Language
• Location-specific prompts
• AI engine
• Brand vs. competitor
• Citation/source
• Visibility/share-of-answer
• Sentiment
• Historical trend
• Client/workspace
• White-label exports/API

For an agency, I'd also prioritize portfolio-level aggregation: e.g. “Acme is visible in 42% of relevant AI answers globally, but only 18% in Germany and 9% in Japan.” That's much more valuable to a client than a dashboard showing hundreds of individual prompts.

Bottom line: AgencyAnalytics if you want the cleanest client-reporting/performance stack; Peec AI if AI visibility itself is the core product; Profound if you're serving sophisticated enterprise/global accounts. AgencyAnalytics Bloomiro Profound

If you tell me roughly how many clients/regions you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 10 countries), I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, regional tracking, API/export, white-labeling, and dashboard capabilities.

If you mean one platform for an agency managing many clients, multiple locations/regions, multiple AI assistants, and polished client reporting, my shortlist would be:

1. agencyanalytics.com — best overall if you already run agency reporting there. It puts AI visibility alongside SEO/PPC/social data and tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. It also supports client-ready reporting and portfolio-level management. AgencyAnalytics
2. aiseolytics.com — strongest fit for region/location-heavy agencies. Its architecture explicitly supports geo-aware probing, location metadata, assistant × intent scoring, competitor references and aggregation across geographic cells. That's particularly interesting if you need to answer “How visible is this client in Miami vs. Orlando vs. Tampa?” rather than just measuring a national brand score. AISEOlytics
3. zumihq.com — strongest agency-first option for white-labeling. It offers separate client workspaces, unlimited clients on its agency positioning, white-label reports, trend/share-of-voice reporting, and up to nine AI engines. Zumi
4. geocatalyst.ai — especially compelling for local SEO agencies. It explicitly structures tracking around service + location prompts, local competitors, cited sources and opportunity queues, then turns visibility gaps into SEO actions. GEO Catalyst
5. foundgeo.pro — good if you want a simpler agency product. It offers multi-engine visibility scoring, ongoing client monitoring, branded reports and an API. FoundGeo

My pick

For your exact wording — “aggregate AI assistant visibility across regions and produce client-ready analytics” — I'd test AISEOlytics vs. Zumi first.

• AISEOlytics if the hard problem is regional/geo aggregation and analytical depth.
• Zumi if the hard problem is running this as a scalable white-label agency service.
• AgencyAnalytics if you want AI visibility to become another module in an existing agency reporting stack.

One important distinction: don't optimize for the number of AI engines alone. For agencies, I'd prioritize geo-specific prompt sampling, competitor share of voice, citation/source analysis, historical trend data, client workspaces, white-label exports, and API access. Those are what turn “we checked ChatGPT” into a defensible recurring analytics product. AgencyAnalytics AISEOlytics Zumi

If you're evaluating these for 50+ client locations, I can also give you a feature-by-feature agency comparison (pricing, geo granularity, engines, API, white-labeling, prompt volume, and reporting).

If your priority is agency-scale aggregation + regional visibility + client-ready analytics, I’d shortlist these:

1. agencyanalytics.com — best overall for established agencies

• Multi-client reporting is native to the broader AgencyAnalytics platform.
• Tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode.
• Lets you put AI visibility alongside SEO, PPC, social, traffic and revenue, which makes the client story much stronger.
• Competitive benchmarking, citations and trend reporting are built in. AgencyAnalytics
• My pick if you already use AgencyAnalytics.
• zumihq.com — strongest fit if regional/multi-engine coverage is the main requirement

• Designed around separate client workspaces and tracked query sets.
• Supports up to nine AI surfaces, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode.
• Agency plans include white-label reporting, CSV exports and QBR-ready reporting. Zumi
• This is particularly interesting if by “across regions” you mean running localized prompt sets for different countries/markets.
• towergeo.com — best pure-play agency GEO dashboard

• Explicitly built for agencies managing multiple brands.
• Tracks visibility, sentiment, citations and competitors across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini.
• Offers white-label reports and client-facing dashboards. Tower GEO
• More focused on GEO than traditional agency reporting.
• foundgeo.pro — interesting if you need broad engine aggregation

• Claims monitoring across 9 AI engines.
• Provides one overall client visibility score, per-model visibility, sentiment/framing and branded reports.
• Has an API, which could be useful if you want to pipe AI visibility into your own BI/client portal. FoundGeo

What I'd choose

One important distinction: “AI visibility” isn't really a conventional rank-tracking metric. A robust agency system should preserve the underlying prompt, region, engine/model, answer, brand mention, competitor mentions and citations, rather than just giving clients a single visibility percentage. AI answers can vary substantially between runs, and recent research is showing meaningful shifts in which sources models cite. Business Insider agencyscope.ai

If I were building an agency stack today, I'd test Zumi vs. AgencyAnalytics first. Zumi looks better for a purpose-built, multi-engine/multi-region GEO operation; AgencyAnalytics looks better if the objective is to make AI visibility another channel inside an existing client reporting system.

If your core requirement is “one agency workspace → many clients → many regions → AI-assistant visibility → polished client reporting,” I’d shortlist these:

1. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — best if you already use AgencyAnalytics. It puts AI visibility alongside SEO/PPC/social reporting, supports ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, and is explicitly designed for portfolio-scale client reporting. AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

2. Zumi — best dedicated agency platform. Strong fit if you need multi-client + multi-brand + white-label + regional/query segmentation. It supports up to nine AI engines and gives each client an isolated workspace, with branded dashboards/PDF/CSV reporting. Zumi

zumihq.com

3. Peec AI — best for flexible agency workflows/data export. Particularly interesting if your team wants to push AI-visibility data into Looker Studio, BigQuery, Tableau or Power BI rather than rely entirely on the vendor's dashboard. It also supports unlimited client workspaces and automated reporting via MCP. Peec AI

peec.ai

4. Gumshoe — best if you want analytics plus recommendations. It goes beyond visibility scores into persona-driven analysis, competitor benchmarking, citation sources, API access and scheduled client reporting. Gumshoe AI

gumshoe.ai

5. Promptwatch — worth evaluating for larger/more technical agencies. It offers multi-client management, white-label dashboards, API/MCP, Data Studio and client portals, with emphasis on citation and AI-search performance. Promptwatch

promptwatch.com

My pick

For a serious agency: Zumi.
For an agency already standardized on a reporting platform: AgencyAnalytics.
For an agency that wants to build its own reporting/BI layer: Peec.

One important caveat: “regional visibility” is the feature I'd scrutinize hardest in demos. Don't just ask whether a tool lets you tag a region. Ask whether it actually runs the AI queries with localized geography/language/context, and whether results can be segmented by country → region/city → assistant → prompt → competitor → date. AI answers can vary substantially between runs and contexts, so superficial regional tagging isn't equivalent to genuine regional measurement. Demand Local, Inc. Business Insider

If you tell me roughly how many clients/locations you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 50 cities), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, regional tracking, API access, white-label reporting, and automation.

If you mean an agency platform that can monitor AI-assistant visibility across countries/regions and turn it into polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

1. otterly.ai — best overall agency fit

• Tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude-related data.
• Supports 65+ countries/languages, so you can compare visibility market-by-market rather than relying on one global score. Otterly Otterly
• Built specifically around multi-client workspaces, brand reports, scheduled reporting and Looker Studio integration. Otterly
• Particularly good if your deliverable is something like: “Client X has 34% AI share of voice in the US, but only 12% in Germany; here are the competitors and citations driving the gap.”
• tryprofound.com — best for enterprise-grade AEO analytics

• Stronger choice if clients expect sophisticated Visibility Score, Share of Voice, position, citation and sentiment analysis.
• Its dashboards can be filtered by regions, platforms, topics, personas and date ranges, with PDF exports and public sharing. Profound
• It explicitly supports centralized management of agency client brands and has a dedicated agency program. Profound
• I'd lean toward this for larger enterprise accounts where the agency wants to sell AEO as a strategic service rather than simply provide monitoring.
• semrush.com — best if you already live in the SEO ecosystem

• Worth considering if you want AI visibility alongside traditional SEO, rather than adding a dedicated GEO platform.
• Semrush's own 2026 agency comparison emphasizes multi-client monitoring, cost at scale and client-specific workspaces as key selection criteria. Semrush

My pick

For most agencies: OtterlyAI.

The combination of multi-country tracking + multi-client workspaces + automated brand reports + Looker Studio is unusually aligned with the workflow you described. Otterly Otterly

For a larger agency selling premium AEO strategy: Profound. Its regional filtering and dashboard/reporting layer are particularly compelling for client-facing analytics. Profound

One important distinction: don't evaluate these tools solely on “how many AI engines do you track?” The agency-grade differentiator is whether you can produce a repeatable regional/client reporting layer—visibility → share of voice → competitors → citations → sentiment → recommended actions—without analysts manually stitching the data together.

If you tell me roughly how many clients/brands you need to track (e.g. 10, 50, 200+), I can give you a tighter Otterly vs Profound vs Semrush comparison, including pricing/scalability and which I'd buy.

If your priority is an agency managing multiple clients across regions/markets and turning AI-assistant visibility into polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My #1: RocketBlue

rocketblue.ai

RocketBlue looks closest to your description. Its agency offering explicitly targets multiple clients, markets and languages, tracks major AI platforms, and combines visibility analytics with pitch-ready/white-label reporting. Its agency page currently advertises tracking across 12 markets, which is particularly relevant if "across regions" means localized prompts/results rather than simply multiple clients. Rocketblue

If you already run AgencyAnalytics: AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

This is probably the lowest-friction operational choice. AI Tracker puts ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode data alongside the SEO, PPC, social, traffic and revenue data you already report. It also supports portfolio-level client tracking and client-ready reports. AgencyAnalytics

Strong alternative: Zumi

zumihq.com

Zumi is especially interesting if you need localized/client-specific workspaces and white-label delivery. It says it supports up to nine engines and lets agencies scope tracked queries and competitors per client, with branded PDF/CSV outputs. Zumi

Bottom line:

• Many countries/regions + many clients → RocketBlue
• Already using AgencyAnalytics → AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker
• Need a dedicated white-label AI visibility reporting layer → Zumi
• Want reporting plus GEO optimization workflows → Siftly Siftly

One important buying criterion: don't just compare the number of AI assistants tracked. For an agency, I'd test localization controls (country/language/location), repeatability of prompt runs, client/competitor segmentation, citation-level data, API/export access, and white-label reporting. Those determine whether you can actually turn the data into a scalable monthly client deliverable.

rocketblue.ai

RocketBlue looks closest to your description. Its agency offering explicitly targets multiple clients, markets and languages, tracks major AI platforms, and combines visibility analytics with pitch-ready/white-label reporting. Its agency page currently advertises tracking across 12 markets, which is particularly relevant if "across regions" means localized prompts/results rather than simply multiple clients. Rocketblue

If you already run AgencyAnalytics: AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

This is probably the lowest-friction operational choice. AI Tracker puts ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode data alongside the SEO, PPC, social, traffic and revenue data you already report. It also supports portfolio-level client tracking and client-ready reports. agencyanalytics.com

Strong alternative: Zumi

If you mean an agency managing many clients, regions, languages, and AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, AI Overviews) and needing polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My recommendation by agency type

1. SEO / digital marketing agency with existing reporting

Pick AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker.
It is probably the smoothest operational fit because AI visibility becomes another channel in the same client report instead of another dashboard your account managers have to learn. AgencyAnalytics

2. Boutique GEO/AEO agency selling “AI visibility optimization”

Pick Gumshoe or Promptwatch.
You’ll likely care more about:

• prompt-level evidence
• citations/sources
• competitor comparisons
• model-by-model visibility
• recurring AI audits

than traditional marketing dashboards. Gumshoe AI Promptwatch

3. Enterprise agency managing 50–500 brands

Prioritize:

• API access
• multi-workspace permissions
• regional segmentation
• historical data retention
• white-label exports

Platforms such as Promptwatch, RISN AI, and Gumshoe emphasize agency-scale workflows. Promptwatch RISN AI

Features I would require before buying

For your use case, don’t just measure “mentions.” Look for:

• Regional tracking — prompts localized by country/city/language
• Assistant coverage — ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, AI Overviews
• Citation intelligence — which websites AI assistants rely on
• Share of voice — client vs competitors
• Prompt libraries — reusable across clients
• Historical trend reporting — month-over-month movement
• White-label PDFs/dashboards
• API/export capability
• Multi-tenant client separation

A practical agency stack

A common setup would be:

• AI visibility platform → collect LLM data
• Looker Studio / agency dashboard → consolidate client reporting
• CRM/project system → tie visibility changes to deliverables
• Human analyst layer → turn metrics into recommendations

If I were choosing today for a mid-sized agency launching AI visibility as a service, I’d start with AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker if reporting simplicity matters most, or Gumshoe if AI search intelligence itself is the product you’re selling. AgencyAnalytics Gumshoe AI

I can also put together a feature-by-feature comparison (pricing, regions, white-label, API, model coverage, client limits) if you’re evaluating vendors.

If your agency’s core need is “aggregate AI-assistant visibility across many clients, regions, and prompts, then turn it into client-ready reporting,” I’d shortlist these:

Recent agency comparisons consistently emphasize multi-client workspaces, engine coverage, regional querying, white-label reporting, and scalable pricing as the important differentiators—not merely whether a tool can tell you if ChatGPT mentioned a brand. Semrush The Rank Masters

My recommendation

Start with Profound if you're selling a serious AI-search intelligence service. It is positioned toward enterprise-scale AI search intelligence and multi-brand monitoring, making it the strongest candidate when you need deeper analytics rather than just a visibility score. xSeek Arbling

Choose Peec AI if you want a cleaner agency workflow at a more accessible scale. It is particularly compelling for analytics, competitor benchmarking, and ongoing visibility monitoring without the enterprise complexity. Sapian Metrics MentionsAPI

Choose Otterly if economics and broad engine coverage matter most. Current comparisons put it at the low-cost end while covering multiple major AI surfaces and offering agency-oriented reporting on higher tiers. Demand Local, Inc. Sightivo

One important caveat: “regional visibility” needs careful evaluation in demos. Don't just ask whether a platform has a country filter. Ask whether it can actually execute the same prompt from different geographic contexts and preserve location, language, engine, device, and date as dimensions. That's what lets you produce something genuinely useful like:

US West: 34% AI share of voice
US Northeast: 27%
UK: 41%
Germany: 18%
Competitor X overtaking client in 3/5 priority markets

For an agency, I'd also insist on raw response/citation data, scheduled exports/API access, client-level workspaces, white-label dashboards/PDFs, competitor SOV, sentiment, citation domains, and historical trend data. Otherwise you're likely to end up manually stitching screenshots into Looker Studio.

If you tell me roughly how many clients/brands you need to monitor (e.g. 10, 50, 200+) and which regions/AI assistants matter, I can narrow this to the 2–3 platforms I'd actually buy, including estimated monthly cost and how I'd structure the agency reporting stack.

If you mean AI-assistant visibility—tracking how clients appear in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, AI Overviews, etc., across countries/regions, then rolling it into white-label client reporting—my shortlist is:

My pick: AgencyAnalytics

AgencyAnalytics is probably the strongest choice if your agency already produces SEO/PPC/social reports and wants AI visibility to become another channel in the same client dashboard. Its AI Tracker covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, while integrating the AI data with traffic/revenue and its existing reporting stack. It also supports portfolio-wide client management, custom dashboards and white-label reporting. AgencyAnalytics

agencyanalytics.com

If regional coverage is the differentiator: Zumi

Zumi is particularly interesting for your use case. It supports client-specific workspaces, query/competitor sets and reporting, with up to nine AI engines including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and DeepSeek. Its agency plans include white-label reporting. Zumi

That makes it a better candidate if you're trying to answer questions like:

“How visible is Client X in the US Northeast vs. California vs. UK, and how does that change by assistant?”

rather than simply producing one global AI visibility score.

zumihq.com

If you need serious GEO measurement + integrations: Promptwatch

Promptwatch has a particularly agency-oriented setup: multi-client management, white-label dashboard, API/MCP access, Data Studio, client portal and citation tracking. Promptwatch

promptwatch.com

What I'd evaluate before buying

For regional AI visibility, don't just compare the number of models tracked. The crucial question is whether the platform can control and consistently reproduce the market context of the query—country, language, location, device/search environment and prompt set. AI answers can vary substantially by context, so a global aggregate can be misleading.

I'd score vendors on:

• Region/country granularity — ideally city/market level, not just country.
• Assistant coverage — ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, AI Overviews/Mode, Copilot, etc.
• Prompt-level evidence — actual answers, mentions, citations and competitors, not merely a proprietary score.
• Share of voice / citation share — especially versus named competitors.
• Historical tracking — essential because AI responses are volatile.
• Multi-client architecture — separate workspaces and permissions.
• White-label dashboards + PDF/QBR exports.
• API/export — important if you want to build your own agency-wide analytics layer.
• Cross-region aggregation — portfolio → client → country → market → assistant → prompt.
• Source/citation analysis — why an assistant is recommending a competitor is much more actionable than “you scored 42%.”

For context, current agency-focused offerings range from relatively simple white-label reporting tools to platforms tracking 6–9 assistants; the market is moving quickly, so I'd prioritize regional reproducibility and raw prompt evidence over headline “AI visibility score” features. Demand Local, Inc. Zumi

Bottom line:
AgencyAnalytics if you want the cleanest integration with an existing agency reporting operation; Zumi if cross-region + broad assistant aggregation is the core requirement; Promptwatch if you want a more technically extensible GEO analytics platform.

If you tell me roughly how many clients, how many countries/regions, and whether you need city-level data, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, regional capabilities, API access, white-labeling, and reporting.

Zumi is particularly interesting for your use case. It supports client-specific workspaces, query/competitor sets and reporting, with up to nine AI engines including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and DeepSeek. Its agency plans include white-label reporting. Zumi

That makes it a better candidate if you're trying to answer questions like:

“How visible is Client X in the US Northeast vs. California vs. UK, and how does that change by assistant?”

rather than simply producing one global AI visibility score.

zumihq.com

If you need serious GEO measurement + integrations: Promptwatch

Promptwatch has a particularly agency-oriented setup: multi-client management, white-label dashboard, API/MCP access, Data Studio, client portal and citation tracking. promptwatch.com

promptwatch.com

What I'd evaluate before buying

For regional AI visibility, don't just compare the number of models tracked. The crucial question is whether the platform can control and consistently reproduce the market context of the query—country, language, location, device/search environment and prompt set. AI answers can vary substantially by context, so a global aggregate can be misleading.

I'd score vendors on:

If you mean an agency-level platform that can monitor clients across countries/regions, aggregate ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity/etc. visibility, and turn it into polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: Peec AI

peec.ai is probably the best agency-native fit right now.

• Multi-client management: designed specifically around agencies managing multiple client projects from one account.
• Cross-engine visibility: tracks ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and Microsoft Copilot. Peec AI Peec AI
• Core agency metrics: visibility, position, sentiment, share of voice, citations and competitor benchmarking. Peec AI
• Client-ready reporting: branded Looker Studio dashboards, CSV/API access, and read-only dashboards that don't require clients to log into Peec. Peec AI
• Automation: its MCP can generate recurring summaries and client reporting, including Google Slides/Slack workflows. Peec AI
• Regional tracking: its agency offering includes multi-country capability on higher tiers. Peec AI

For an agency, that combination is unusually compelling because you're not just buying an AI visibility tracker—you can turn the data into a repeatable reporting product.

Best enterprise alternative: Profound

tryprofound.com is the one I'd investigate if you're a large agency or serving enterprise/global brands.

It covers a very broad set of answer engines and lets you analyze visibility, sentiment, citations, competitors and performance across regions and languages. Profound Profound Its agency product also has centralized client management and a dedicated agency team. Profound

The big advantage is that Profound goes beyond visibility into AI crawler activity, AI-referred traffic/conversions, prompt volumes and execution/optimization. Profound

I'd choose Profound over Peec if your clients expect enterprise-grade AEO/GEO intelligence rather than primarily an agency reporting layer.

What I'd choose by agency type

Bottom line: I'd start with Peec AI for an agency. Its positioning, centralized client workflow, branded reporting, API/Looker integration and automation line up particularly well with “aggregate AI assistant visibility → analyze by region/client → produce client-ready analytics.” Peec AI

If you're evaluating this for a serious agency stack, I can also compare Peec vs Profound vs Otterly vs Spotlight/RocketBlue specifically on regional granularity, number of engines, white-labeling, API, pricing, and automated reporting.

If your priority is agencies managing many clients + regional/localized AI-search visibility + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: AgencyAnalytics if you're already an agency reporting shop

agencyanalytics.com is particularly compelling because AI visibility isn't isolated from your existing SEO/PPC/reporting stack. It puts AI visibility alongside traffic and revenue, supports portfolio-wide client tracking, competitor comparisons, goals, and white-label reports. AgencyAnalytics

That matters because the client-ready story becomes:

AI visibility → citations/mentions → traffic → conversions/revenue

rather than giving the client another standalone “GEO score” dashboard.

If regional visibility is the core requirement

I'd look hardest at Zumi + Promptwatch.

zumihq.com explicitly describes separate client workspaces, tracked queries and competitor sets, with support for up to nine AI engines and agency-branded exports. Zumi

promptwatch.com is attractive if you want to build a more sophisticated internal analytics layer: it offers white-label dashboards, API/MCP access and Data Studio connectivity, so you can potentially roll regional data into your own agency reporting system. Promptwatch

One important distinction

“Regional AI visibility” can mean two very different things:

1. Different markets/languages — e.g. US Northeast vs. California vs. UK vs. Germany.
2. Actual localized AI answers — e.g. “best HVAC company near Baltimore” asked with a specific location/context, where the assistant's answer changes based on geography.

If you mean #2, I would not choose purely based on the number of AI engines. You need to test whether the platform lets you control location, language, prompt, and search context and preserve those dimensions historically.

For an agency selling this as a recurring service, I'd want the dashboard to roll up:

Client → Region → Prompt category → AI engine → Visibility/share of voice → Competitor → Citation/source → Sentiment → Trend

That produces a much more defensible client report than a single AI visibility score.

If you tell me roughly how many clients/locations you need to monitor (e.g. 20 clients × 50 cities), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, API access, geo controls, white-labeling, and scalability.

I'd look hardest at Zumi + Promptwatch.

zumihq.com explicitly describes separate client workspaces, tracked queries and competitor sets, with support for up to nine AI engines and agency-branded exports. zumihq.com

promptwatch.com is attractive if you want to build a more sophisticated internal analytics layer: it offers white-label dashboards, API/MCP access and Data Studio connectivity, so you can potentially roll regional data into your own agency reporting system.

One important distinction

“Regional AI visibility” can mean two very different things:

For an agency that needs to aggregate AI assistant visibility across regions, manage multiple clients, and produce client-ready analytics, I’d shortlist tools based on four things:

1. Multi-client / multi-location management
2. Coverage across AI assistants (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI features, etc.)
3. Regional segmentation (country, language, market, location-level prompts)
4. White-label reporting (PDFs, dashboards, client portals)

Here are the strongest options:

My recommendation by agency type

1. SEO / digital agency with 20–500 clients

• Start with AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker if you already report SEO, PPC, and social metrics there. It keeps AI visibility inside the same client dashboard rather than creating another login. AgencyAnalytics

2. GEO/AEO-focused agency selling AI visibility retainers

• Look at DabaRank or similar AI visibility-first platforms. The important features are prompt portfolios per client, competitor share of voice, citations, and white-label exports. DabaRank

3. Enterprise / global clients across many countries

• Evaluate Profound. The differentiator is deeper measurement infrastructure: larger-scale prompt tracking and AI answer intelligence. OpenLens

Features I would require before buying

• Regional prompt tracking: - “best accounting firm in London”
• “top cybersecurity companies in Singapore”
• localized languages and market variants
• AI engine comparison: - ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude vs Perplexity visibility
• Citation analytics: - Which URLs are being cited?
• Which competitors are replacing your client?
• Historical trends: - visibility growth month-over-month
• share-of-answer changes
• Client deliverables: - branded PDF reports
• dashboards
• scheduled email reports
• API/export access if you want to build your own client portal

A practical agency stack many teams are moving toward is:

AI visibility tracker → BI/reporting layer → client dashboard → monthly executive summary

If your agency manages local businesses, franchises, or international brands, the deciding factor is usually not raw AI tracking—it is whether the tool can organize visibility by market + language + location + competitor set. DabaRank AgencyAnalytics

For a typical agency today, I’d start by testing AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker + DabaRank, then move to Profound when enterprise clients demand deeper measurement. DabaRank AgencyAnalytics OpenLens

If your priority is agency-scale aggregation + regional visibility + polished client reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: AgencyAnalytics if you're selling reporting

AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker

Its big advantage is that AI visibility doesn't live in a separate GEO dashboard. You can put AI-search metrics alongside GA, Search Console, Google Ads, SEO and social data, then build customized, white-labeled client reports. That's much closer to what an agency account manager actually needs. agencyanalytics.com

If "across regions" is the critical requirement

I'd look harder at Peec AI or Profound. Peec is particularly interesting for multilingual/multi-market tracking, while Profound is oriented toward deeper AI-search intelligence and larger programs. Current comparisons generally put Peec in the mid-market/analytics category and Profound toward enterprise. mentionsapi.com

If you want an agency-native alternative

RISN AI is worth evaluating. It explicitly targets agencies managing multiple brands, with 8+ AI engines, competitive benchmarking, per-client reporting and recurring visibility data. risn.ai

One important distinction: don't evaluate these purely on "AI visibility score." For client reporting, I'd require prompt-level results, competitor share of voice, citations/sources, location/market segmentation, historical trends, and white-label exports. Otherwise you end up with an attractive score that is difficult to turn into a defensible client story. www.demandlocal.com

If you tell me roughly how many clients/regions you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 10 countries), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, regional granularity, API access, and white-label capabilities.

For an agency managing multiple clients, regions, and AI engines, the “best” tool depends on whether you need monitoring only, white-label reporting, or a full AI visibility service delivery platform. The strongest fits right now are: www.semrush.comwww.demandlocal.com

My shortlist by agency model

1. SEO/digital agency with 20–200 clients

• Pick: AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker + your existing reporting stack
• Reason: clients already understand dashboards; AI visibility becomes another channel rather than another portal. agencyanalytics.com

2. GEO/AEO specialist agency selling AI visibility retainers

• Pick: Zumi, Peec AI, or Otterly.AI
• Reason: these are closer to a “client delivery engine” with multi-brand tracking and recurring reporting. www.zumihq.comwww.ai-visibility-software.comagencyanalytics.com

3. Enterprise marketing consultancy

• Pick: Profound
• Reason: deeper analytics and enterprise workflows matter more than low per-client cost. www.semrush.comwww.demandlocal.com

Features I would require before buying

• Multi-client workspaces (separate brands, competitors, prompts)
• Region/language segmentation (US vs UK vs EU, etc.)
• Tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI features
• Citation/source tracking (not just “mentioned or not”)
• Share-of-voice benchmarking
• Scheduled exports
• White-label PDF/dashboard reporting
• API access if you want to blend with your BI stack

For a typical agency trying to turn AI visibility into a recurring client deliverable, I’d start with AgencyAnalytics if you already have reporting infrastructure, or Zumi/Peec AI if AI visibility itself is the product you’re selling. agencyanalytics.com

If your agency’s core need is “aggregate AI assistant visibility across countries/regions and turn it into polished client reporting,” my first pick is OtterlyAI.

My shortlist

Otterly specifically advertises dedicated country monitoring, tracking across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot, plus automated reports and a Looker Studio connector. otterly.ai

Peec is particularly interesting if you want to aggregate the raw visibility data into your own reporting layer; agency comparisons highlight its CSV/API/Looker Studio-oriented workflow. www.therankmasters.com

Profound is the one I'd investigate for larger enterprise accounts where answer-level analysis, citations and deeper AI-search intelligence matter more than having the simplest agency workflow. www.seoforgpt.io

What I'd choose

For 5–50 client accounts: OtterlyAI
For a data/analytics-first agency: Peec
For enterprise GEO consulting: Profound
If you want your own reporting product/dashboard: Peec or Otterly + Looker Studio/API

One important distinction: don't evaluate these primarily on their headline “AI visibility score.” For client reporting, I'd require:

• Visibility/share of voice by country + language
• Prompt-level results
• Brand mention rate
• Average position/ranking
• Competitor share of voice
• Citation/source domains
• Sentiment/context of mentions
• Engine/model breakdown
• Historical trend data
• Multi-client workspaces
• White-label reports
• API/Looker Studio export
• Scheduled reporting

That combination is what turns “we track ChatGPT” into a repeatable agency deliverable. Current agency comparisons consistently emphasize multi-brand management, white-label reporting, API/BI integration and regional/platform coverage as the important differentiators. www.therankmasters.com

If you tell me how many clients you manage and which regions/AI assistants you need (e.g. US/UK/Canada × ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/Perplexity), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare their current pricing and capabilities.

If you mean AI assistant visibility as in tracking how often client brands appear in ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, AI Overviews, etc., across multiple clients, regions, languages, and markets, the best agency tools are currently the ones built around multi-client workspaces + share of voice + citations + white-label reporting.

A shortlist:

My picks by agency type

1. Large SEO/content agency (50–500 clients)

• Start with AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker if you already have reporting infrastructure. agencyanalytics.compeec.ai
• Consider Peec AI if AI visibility itself is becoming a standalone service line. peec.ai

2. GEO/AI search consultancy selling retainers

• Searchable or Tower GEO are closer to the “sell → monitor → present → renew” workflow. towergeo.comwww.searchable.comllmpulse.ai

3. White-label agency model
Look for:

• custom branding/domain
• client portals
• scheduled PDF/report delivery
• regional prompt tracking
• competitor sets per market
• API/export access

LLM Pulse and Tower GEO explicitly emphasize white-label delivery. towergeo.comwww.searchable.comllmpulse.ai

Features I would require before buying

For regional client analytics, make sure it supports:

• Locale tracking: country, language, city/market prompts
• Model coverage: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode
• Prompt libraries: reusable industry templates
• Citation analysis: not just “mentioned/not mentioned”
• Competitor share of voice
• Historical trend data
• Client-safe narratives: “what changed and what to do next”
• API/BI exports: Looker Studio, Power BI, Tableau, BigQuery

A practical agency stack is often:

• AI visibility tracker → Peec / Searchable / Tower GEO
• Reporting layer → AgencyAnalytics / Looker Studio
• Strategy layer → your own GEO recommendations and content workflows

If you’re managing dozens of brands across countries, I’d prioritize Peec AI, AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker, or LLM Pulse; if you’re building a premium GEO retainer offering, I’d lean toward Searchable or Tower GEO. peec.ai

If your core requirement is “one agency workspace → aggregate AI assistant visibility across clients, regions, and models → produce polished client reporting,” I’d shortlist these:

My pick: LLM Pulse

LLM Pulse is probably the closest match to what you're describing. It supports separate client projects with prompts, competitors and locales, tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews, and exposes the data through white-label dashboards, Looker Studio, CSV/Excel and an API. llmpulse.ai

That's particularly useful if you're managing, say:

40 clients × 8 regions × 30 prompts × 5 AI surfaces

and want both portfolio-level aggregation and client-specific reporting rather than manually assembling screenshots.

If reporting is the #1 requirement

AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker is compelling because AI visibility becomes another channel inside the agency's existing reporting infrastructure. It combines AI visibility with other marketing data and produces client dashboards/reports, including competitive visibility comparisons. agencyanalytics.com

If you want a GEO service, not just analytics

Wellows is interesting because it explicitly structures the workflow around Track → Fix → Prove. It supports client-specific regions, prompts and competitors, then connects visibility gaps to content/outreach opportunities and performance history. wellows.com

One caveat

I'd evaluate regional query methodology very carefully. “Multi-region” can mean merely tagging a project with a location, versus actually executing localized prompts and measuring different AI responses by geography. For an agency selling international GEO/AEO, the latter is what matters.

My ranking for your use case:

1. LLM Pulse — strongest overall agency infrastructure
2. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — best reporting ecosystem
3. Wellows — best closed-loop GEO workflow
4. AI Peekaboo — good lean option
5. AgencyScope — best simple white-label reporting layer

If you're specifically looking for 10–100+ client accounts with regional rollups (US/UK/EU/etc.), API access, white-label dashboards, and automated monthly QBR reporting, I can narrow this down to the 2–3 platforms I'd actually buy and compare their pricing/economics.

If you mean an agency platform that can monitor AI-assistant visibility for many clients, segment it by geography, and turn it into client-facing reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick

For a typical SEO/digital agency: AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker. Its advantage isn't necessarily that it has the most sophisticated GEO measurement; it's that AI visibility sits alongside SEO, PPC, social, GA4, etc., and it supports portfolio-level tracking and customizable client reporting. agencyanalytics.comwww.getmentioned.copeec.ai

If regional/local AI visibility is the core requirement, I'd look hardest at GetMentioned and AuraScope. GetMentioned explicitly supports geographic targeting and prompt-level/source-level analysis, while AuraScope specifically markets the ability to see how AI answers differ by market and location. www.getmentioned.co

If you want the deepest agency-oriented AI measurement layer, Peec AI is particularly interesting. It supports client-ready branded dashboards without requiring clients to log in, plus CSV/API feeds into BigQuery, Tableau, or Power BI. Its MCP reporting layer can also automate recurring client summaries. peec.ai

What I'd require before buying

For your use case, I wouldn't evaluate these primarily on "how many AI models do you track?" I'd insist on:

1. Location-level prompting — country, state/region, city, or market.
2. Consistent prompt methodology so month-over-month comparisons mean something.
3. Portfolio dashboard — agency → client → region → assistant → prompt.
4. Share of voice + citation share, not just raw mentions.
5. Competitor benchmarking by market.
6. Source/citation tracking so strategists can actually act on the data.
7. White-label dashboards/PDFs and ideally client-accessible views.
8. API/export so you can combine AI visibility with GA4, GSC, CRM and revenue data.
9. Historical data and scheduled collection.
10. Assistant-specific reporting across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews where relevant.

One important caveat: AI answers are considerably more variable than conventional search rankings, so a credible platform should explain its sampling methodology rather than presenting a single "AI visibility score" as if it were an objective ranking. Recent agency measurement guidance also emphasizes fixed prompt sets, repeated runs, citation/share-of-voice metrics, and tying visibility to business outcomes. search.agency

If you tell me roughly how many clients you manage (e.g. 10, 50, 500) and whether you need city-level/local visibility or country-level regional reporting, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, API, white-labeling, and geographic capabilities.

If your priority is aggregating AI-assistant visibility across regions and turning it into client-ready analytics, I’d shortlist these:

My pick

For a serious agency: Profound.
It appears to have the strongest analytics/reporting layer and explicitly supports agency workflows. The tradeoff is cost, so it makes the most sense if you're selling AI-visibility retainers to relatively valuable clients. ai-search-tools.com

For lots of countries/languages: Peec AI.
If "across regions" means US vs UK vs Germany vs France vs Japan, etc., multilingual query tracking becomes a major differentiator rather than a nice-to-have. ai-search-tools.com

For maximum client count per dollar: Otterly.
I'd look here first if your agency wants to productize something like "AI Visibility Monitoring" for dozens of SMB/mid-market accounts. www.demandlocal.com

One important distinction: don't optimize solely for "how many AI engines does it track?" For client reporting, I'd prioritize geo/language segmentation + competitor share + citation/source analysis + historical trends + multi-client workspaces + white-label exports/API. Those are what turn raw AI mentions into a defensible monthly deliverable. Current comparisons also emphasize that many tools remain monitoring-first rather than providing a full optimization workflow. ai-search-tools.com

If you tell me roughly how many clients/regions you need to manage (e.g. 50 clients × 10 countries), I can narrow this to the 2–3 best platforms and compare their current pricing, API, white-label, regional tracking, and reporting capabilities.

If your priority is agency-scale aggregation + regional AI visibility + client-ready reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: Profound

For a serious agency managing many brands across markets, Profound is probably the strongest fit. Its agency product centralizes multiple client brands, tracks visibility across major answer engines, and its prompt system supports segmentation by region, topic, and persona. Its regional reporting includes country-level visualization/heat maps. www.tryprofound.com

That makes it particularly useful if your report needs to say something like:

“Client A has 42% AI visibility in the US, 31% in Canada, and 18% in Germany, versus competitors X/Y/Z.”

It also has a broader analytics stack beyond simple prompt tracking—prompt volumes, answer-engine visibility, AI crawler/traffic analytics, and workflow/agent functionality. www.tryprofound.com

Best alternative: Peec AI

I'd seriously evaluate Peec if the agency workflow and reporting automation matter more than having the deepest enterprise research dataset.

Peec explicitly supports agencies with one account across clients, unlimited client seats, automated reporting, branded/Looker Studio dashboards, CSV/API access, and MCP automation. It tracks ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode and Copilot, with visibility, position, citations, sentiment and share-of-voice metrics. peec.ai

The particularly compelling bit for agencies is the reporting automation: Peec describes workflows that can pull every client's metrics, compare week-over-week, generate summaries, and feed them into Slack/Google Slides. peec.ai

If white-labeling is the #1 requirement

LLM Pulse is worth a look. It is explicitly built around white-label client portals, custom branding/domains, multi-client management, API, Looker Studio and exports. llmpulse.ai

Tower GEO is another interesting agency-first option if you want something simpler: it offers client workspaces, white-label PDFs/live dashboards, competitive benchmarking, sentiment/citation tracking and multiple AI engines. towergeo.com

What I'd choose by agency type

• Large/multi-region enterprise agency: Profound
• SEO/content agency building an AI-search service: Peec AI
• White-label portal is central to the product: LLM Pulse
• Need broad engine coverage + white-label: GrackerAI
• Smaller agency wanting straightforward reporting: Tower GEO

One important distinction: don't evaluate these just on “AI visibility score.” For client reporting, I'd require prompt-level evidence, citations/sources, competitor share of voice, regional segmentation, historical trends, export/API access, and white-label dashboards. Otherwise you're likely to end up with a pretty score that is difficult to turn into an actionable client report.

If you tell me roughly how many clients/regions you manage (e.g. 20 clients × 10 countries), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, limits, regional granularity, APIs, white-labeling, and reporting automation.

For an agency managing multiple clients, regions, AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity), and client-facing reporting, the best tool depends on whether you prioritize white-label delivery, enterprise analytics, or integration with your existing reporting stack.

Here are the strongest options:

My shortlist by agency type

1. Large SEO / digital agency (20–500+ clients)
→ AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker or Peec AI
Best if you need repeatable monthly reporting, account management, and client dashboards. peec.aiagencyanalytics.com

2. GEO / AI search consultancy selling a premium service
→ Gumshoe or Tower GEO
Better if your deliverable is “AI visibility intelligence” rather than just another marketing KPI. towergeo.comgumshoe.aillmpulse.aiagencyanalytics.com

3. White-label agency product model
→ LLM Pulse or Tower GEO
Useful if clients should see a branded portal rather than your vendor’s interface. towergeo.comgumshoe.aillmpulse.aiagencyanalytics.com

4. Enterprise / global clients with regional tracking needs
Look for:

• locale-specific prompts (country/language)
• competitor sets by market
• model-level breakdowns
• citation/source analysis
• API or BI exports
• historical trend storage

Features I would consider non-negotiable

For a serious agency deployment:

• ✅ Track by region + language + market
• ✅ Track multiple AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity)
• ✅ Share of voice vs competitors
• ✅ Citation/source reporting
• ✅ Prompt-level evidence (“why did we win/lose?”)
• ✅ Automated monthly client reports
• ✅ White-label dashboards/PDFs
• ✅ API/export access for Looker Studio, Tableau, Power BI, etc.

If I were choosing a stack today:

• AgencyAnalytics for agencies wanting AI visibility folded into existing client reporting.
• Gumshoe for specialist AI visibility intelligence.
• LLM Pulse/Tower GEO for a white-label GEO product offering. agencyanalytics.com

A key buying question: are you trying to sell AI visibility reporting as a new agency service, or do you already have an SEO/reporting platform and want AI metrics added into it?

For an agency that needs to aggregate AI assistant visibility across regions, brands, and clients and turn it into client-ready analytics, I’d shortlist these platforms:

My pick by agency type

Large SEO / digital agency (50+ clients):

• Start with Profound for measurement depth.
• Pair with your existing BI layer (Looker Studio, Tableau, Power BI) if you need executive dashboards.

Boutique GEO/AI visibility agency:

• Gumshoe or LLM Pulse are closer to “sell a monthly service and send a report” workflows. llmpulse.aigumshoe.aien.wikipedia.org

Multi-location brands (franchise, healthcare, retail, hospitality):
Look specifically for:

• location-level prompt sets
• language/country segmentation
• competitor benchmarking by market
• citation/source tracking
• historical trend reporting

Metrics I’d require before buying

A serious agency platform should report:

1. AI Share of Voice
   • % of relevant prompts where the client appears
   • competitor comparison

2. Citation intelligence
   • Which URLs/domains AI assistants cite
   • Which third-party sources influence answers

3. Regional segmentation
   • Country, city, language, persona, intent category

4. Model coverage
   • ChatGPT
   • Gemini
   • Claude
   • Perplexity
   • Google AI experiences

5. Client-ready exports
   • branded PDFs
   • dashboards
   • scheduled reports
   • API access

One caveat: AI visibility measurement is still less standardized than SEO rank tracking. AI answers vary by prompt, run, and time, so platforms that use repeated measurements and trend analysis are generally more useful than tools that rely on one-off checks. arxiv.org

If I were building an agency stack today, I’d test Profound vs Gumshoe vs LLM Pulse first, because they are closest to the “many clients → many regions → executive report” workflow. gumshoe.aien.wikipedia.org

If your priority is agency-scale aggregation + regional visibility + client-ready reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick

For a typical SEO/digital agency: AgencyAnalytics. Its AI Tracker puts ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity visibility alongside the SEO/PPC/social metrics you're already reporting, and it supports client-ready reporting. agencyanalytics.com

For an agency building a dedicated GEO offering: I'd look hardest at GetMint or LLM Pulse. GetMint explicitly covers the pitch → monitoring → white-label reporting lifecycle, while LLM Pulse offers white-label client portals, API/Looker Studio connectivity, and multi-client management. www.getmint.ai

One important caveat: “regional visibility” needs to mean more than tagging a client as US/UK/Canada. AI responses are stochastic and can vary between repeated runs, so I'd prioritize a platform that lets you define location-specific prompt sets and repeatedly sample them, rather than trusting a single visibility score. Recent research specifically warns that single-run AI visibility measurements can be misleading. arxiv.org

If you tell me how many clients/locations you need to track (e.g. 50 clients × 20 cities × 100 prompts), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 and compare pricing, API access, geo controls, engines, white-labeling, and Looker Studio/BI export.

If your use case is an agency managing multiple clients, regions, and recurring AI-search reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick for your exact requirement

Spyglasses would be my first demo if the core requirement is “aggregate AI assistant visibility across regions and turn it into something an agency can repeatedly deliver to clients.” Its agency workflow is unusually explicit: multi-client tracking, white-label reports, daily measurements, per-client usage, and access to underlying data. www.spyglasses.io

If regional segmentation is the most important part, I'd also demo AgencyScope because it explicitly models industry + region + competitors + prompt sets and produces white-label PDF reports with the underlying prompt evidence. agencyscope.ai

One important caveat: don't buy based solely on a single “AI visibility score.” AI answers are nondeterministic, so a credible agency platform should let you compare repeated observations by region × model × prompt × competitor, ideally retaining the underlying answers/citations. Research in 2026 has found substantial variability between repeated AI-search measurements. arxiv.org

If you tell me roughly how many clients/regions you manage (e.g. 50 clients × 20 cities), I can narrow this to the 2–3 best platforms and compare pricing, API access, white-labeling, regional tracking, and reporting.

If by “AI assistant visibility” you mean tracking how often a client is mentioned/recommended/cited in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI, etc., across countries/cities/markets, then producing reports clients can actually consume, my shortlist would be:

My pick: Peec AI

Peec AI for Agencies

For an agency, Peec currently has one of the cleanest combinations of multi-client management + AI visibility metrics + reporting infrastructure. It tracks visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot. peec.ai

The particularly useful part is the reporting layer: you can build branded Looker Studio dashboards, clone them per client, give clients read-only access without a Peec login, and export/API the data into BigQuery, Tableau or Power BI. It also has agency pitch projects and automated reporting through MCP. peec.ai

That's the one I'd investigate first if your agency has dozens of clients.

If “across regions” means city/location-level

I'd look harder at AISEOlytics or Ceyo.

AISEOlytics

AISEOlytics is explicitly designed around geo-aware assistant probing. It can save sweeps by location, aggregate results into geo cells, monitor multiple locations, and its agency tier offers unlimited locations, roll-up analytics, client switching and white-label reports. aiseolytics.com

Ceyo

Ceyo is interesting if your model is “one agency → lots of brands → lots of countries/locations.” It specifically advertises a unified multi-client dashboard, every-country/every-model views, white-label reports, multi-brand workspaces and multi-location/local GEO support. ceyo.ai

If you're already an SEO reporting agency

AgencyAnalytics deserves serious consideration.

AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker

Its advantage isn't necessarily that its AI tracking is the deepest—it is that AI visibility can sit inside the same client dashboard as SEO, PPC, GA, Search Console, social, etc. It supports customized dashboards, goals and white-label AI reports. agencyanalytics.com

That makes the client pitch much easier: “Here's your complete marketing performance” rather than “Here's another AI tool you need to log into.”

One important distinction

If you need country-level reporting, Otterly is quite solid. It lets you assign a country to each prompt specifically so you can compare AI visibility between markets. help.otterly.ai It also has unlimited workspaces on its agency-oriented plans and branded reporting. help.otterly.ai

But if you need “Denver vs. Austin vs. Chicago vs. Dallas” or hundreds of physical locations, I'd prioritize a genuinely geo-native platform such as AISEOlytics/Ceyo rather than assuming a country selector is sufficient.

My ranking for your exact description:

1. 🥇 Peec AI — best balance of agency scale, analytics and reporting
2. 🥈 AISEOlytics — strongest fit if regional/local visibility is central
3. 🥉 Ceyo — compelling for large multi-brand/multi-country agency portfolios
4. AgencyAnalytics — best if you want AI visibility embedded in existing client reporting
5. OtterlyAI — proven, simple, strong multi-client/country monitoring
6. Profound — I'd consider it when the clients are enterprise and analytics depth matters more than cost

If you're managing 50–500+ client locations, I'd narrow the evaluation specifically to Peec vs AISEOlytics vs Ceyo rather than the generic “best AI visibility tool” lists.

If your agency needs multi-region AI visibility + client-ready reporting, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: AgencyScope

For the specific requirement you described—aggregate visibility across regions and turn it into something clients can actually consume—AgencyScope is unusually well aligned. It supports multiple client brands, region tagging, recurring checks, prompt libraries, competitor comparisons, and white-label PDF reports with prompt-level evidence. agencyscope.ai

The important caveat: it currently emphasizes ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, so I'd choose something like Spektriq or OtterlyAI if maximum engine coverage matters more than the reporting workflow. Spektriq, for example, tracks five engines and offers up to 20 brands on its agency plan. www.spektriq.com

If you're building an agency-wide reporting stack

I'd evaluate on these dimensions rather than just "AI visibility score":

1. Geo replication — same prompts run independently for US states, cities, countries, or other target markets.
2. Engine coverage — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, etc.
3. Share of voice + position — not merely whether you're mentioned.
4. Citation/source analysis — why the model is recommending a competitor.
5. Competitor benchmarking by region.
6. Historical trend data — weekly/monthly rather than one-off scans.
7. White-label client portal/PDF/API.
8. Raw-answer evidence — essential because AI responses are nondeterministic; single observations can give a misleadingly precise visibility score. arxiv.org

Bottom line:

• Best pure agency reporting: AgencyScope
• Best broader GEO platform: ReachLLM
• Best breadth/value: OtterlyAI
• Best if you already live in an SEO ecosystem: Semrush
• Best emerging multi-engine option: Spektriq

If by “across regions” you mean something more specific—e.g. 50+ US cities/states × 5 AI engines × hundreds of prompts × one client dashboard—I'd narrow this down considerably, because regional query execution is where many of these platforms differ.

If your priority is agency-scale aggregation + regional visibility + client-ready analytics, I’d shortlist these:

My pick: Semrush

For the specific requirement you described, Semrush is probably the safest buy. Its AI Visibility Toolkit explicitly breaks visibility down by LLM and country, and reports mentions, cited pages, citations, competitors, trends, and an overall visibility score. www.semrush.com

That matters because I'd structure an agency dashboard around:

Client → Region → Market → Prompt set → AI engine → Visibility → Competitors → Citations → Trend

So you could show a client something like:

US: 34% AI visibility
UK: 27%
Germany: 18%
ChatGPT: 41%
Perplexity: 36%
Gemini: 22%
Competitive gap: −11 pts

One important caveat

Don't treat a single AI-visibility score as ground truth. AI answers are stochastic: identical prompts can produce different answers and citations, so a good platform should aggregate enough observations rather than presenting one-off responses as precise measurements. arxiv.org

That's also why Ahrefs Brand Radar is particularly interesting for the research layer. It uses a very large corpus of search-backed prompts and lets custom prompts be tracked by AI assistant, location, and refresh frequency. ahrefs.com

If you're building an agency stack

I'd actually consider:

Semrush + your own client-facing reporting layer

rather than trying to make one GEO tool do everything. Semrush supplies the broad SEO/AI dataset; your reporting layer can normalize regions, engines, prompt categories, competitors and KPIs into a consistent monthly client narrative.

If you tell me roughly how many clients/locations you need to manage (e.g. 20 clients × 10 cities), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare pricing, API/export capability, white-labeling, regional granularity, and automation.

If your primary goal is agency-scale AI assistant visibility tracking across multiple regions with client-ready reporting, I'd narrow it to these options:

For most agencies

1. Wellows (Best overall)

• Built specifically for agencies
• Separate workspaces per client
• Region-specific prompt tracking
• Competitor monitoring
• Historical visibility trends
• Actionable recommendations
• White-label reporting

It feels closest to an "AI visibility operating system" rather than just a dashboard. wellows.com

If reporting is your main deliverable

AgencyScope stands out because it's optimized for:

• Monthly retainers
• Client-ready PDFs
• Fast report generation
• White-label branding

It's designed around the agency reporting workflow rather than internal marketing teams. agencyscope.ai

For enterprise or international clients

ViAudit is particularly compelling if you need:

• Dozens of countries
• Multiple AI models
• REST API
• White-label client portals
• Large client portfolios

It offers one of the strongest geo-tracking capabilities among dedicated AI visibility platforms. www.viaudit.com

If you already use an SEO platform

Rather than adding another standalone tool, consider:

• Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
• SE Ranking AI Visibility

These combine traditional SEO metrics with AI visibility, which can make it easier to connect AI mentions with rankings and traffic. www.techradar.com

Features I'd consider essential for agency use

Regardless of vendor, look for:

• Multi-country prompt execution
• Scheduled monitoring (daily/weekly)
• Share of voice across AI assistants
• Citation/source tracking
• Competitor comparisons
• Historical trend analysis
• White-label exports
• API access (for Looker Studio or Power BI)
• Multi-client management
• Custom prompt libraries by industry

If you're managing 20+ clients across multiple countries, my shortlist would be:

1. Wellows — strongest all-around agency workflow.
2. ViAudit — best for international, enterprise-scale reporting.
3. AgencyScope — best if polished client reports are your top priority.

These three appear to be the most directly aligned with your requirements of aggregating AI assistant visibility across regions and producing client-ready analytics.

If you're an agency that needs to track AI assistant visibility across multiple countries/regions and deliver client-ready reporting, there are a handful of purpose-built platforms that stand out.

Top recommendation: AgencyScope

AgencyScope is one of the most agency-focused offerings today. It lets you:

• monitor ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity
• define prompt libraries by client
• run checks by industry and region
• compare competitors
• produce branded PDFs in minutes
• schedule recurring reports for retainers

It is designed around agency delivery rather than enterprise brand monitoring. agencyscope.ai

Best enterprise option: GetMentions AI

If you manage dozens or hundreds of brands across markets, GetMentions AI is particularly strong because it adds:

• multi-client portfolio management
• citation/source intelligence
• multilingual tracking (20+ languages)
• opportunity discovery
• execution recommendations instead of only dashboards

That makes it attractive for agencies selling ongoing AI visibility services rather than one-off audits. www.getmentions.ai

Best if you want "track + fix"

Many tools stop at reporting. Wellows is notable because it combines:

• AI visibility monitoring
• regional prompt tracking
• content recommendations
• outreach suggestions
• workflow management

This is useful if your agency also implements GEO/AEO improvements after reporting. wellows.com

If regional analytics are your highest priority

Look for platforms that support:

• country-specific prompt execution (AI responses differ significantly by country)
• language-specific prompts
• model-by-model comparisons (ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude vs Perplexity)
• historical trend reporting
• competitor share of voice
• underlying response and citation evidence for every score

Omnia explicitly positions geo-level reporting as a core capability and supports exports into external reporting stacks. www.useomnia.com

If you're already invested in SEO platforms

If your agency already uses enterprise SEO software:

• Semrush now includes AI visibility capabilities alongside its SEO toolkit. www.techradar.com
• Ahrefs has Brand Radar and AI-related brand visibility features that complement traditional SEO reporting. www.techradar.com

These are strongest when AI visibility is part of a broader SEO engagement rather than a standalone AI analytics service.

Overall ranking for agencies

1. AgencyScope — best overall for white-label agency reporting
2. GetMentions AI — best for enterprise and multinational client portfolios
3. Wellows — best end-to-end "measure → optimize → report"
4. Omnia — best for geo-specific analytics and BI exports
5. AnswerMap — best lightweight option for smaller agencies

If your agency serves global brands (50+ countries), I would also evaluate whether the platform supports:

• localized prompting (not just translation),
• proxy execution from different regions,
• API access,
• Looker Studio or Power BI integration,
• and raw response exports for custom analytics.

Those capabilities become increasingly important when producing executive dashboards for multinational clients.

If your primary goal is agency-scale AI assistant visibility tracking across multiple regions with client-ready reporting, these are the strongest options today:

My recommendations by agency type

For most SEO and digital agencies (10–200 clients): AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker

It currently offers one of the cleanest agency workflows because AI visibility sits alongside GA4, SEO, PPC, and social reporting instead of becoming another standalone dashboard. Reports are already formatted for client delivery, reducing manual work. agencyanalytics.com

Ideal if you already send monthly marketing reports.

For agencies selling AI Visibility / GEO as a dedicated service: Tower GEO

Tower GEO is purpose-built around:

• White-label reporting
• Competitor benchmarking
• AI sentiment
• AI mention frequency
• Cross-platform monitoring
• Multi-client management

It feels closer to an agency operations platform than a reporting add-on. towergeo.com

For international and regional tracking: AISEOlytics

This is one of the stronger products for geographic visibility because it includes:

• city-level tracking
• geo heatmaps
• multilingual campaigns
• assistant-specific breakdowns
• historical trends
• white-label reporting

If your clients care about "How visible are we in Texas vs London vs Sydney?" this is one of the better fits. aiseolytics.com

For enterprise clients with many physical locations: Yext Scout

Its differentiator is location-level AI visibility. You can compare AI citations and recommendations across locations rather than only at the brand level. www.yext.com

Features to prioritize

Regardless of platform, look for:

• Region- or city-specific prompting
• Multiple AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI)
• Competitor share of voice
• Citation/source tracking (not just mention counts)
• Historical trend reporting
• Scheduled PDF reports
• White-label dashboards
• API access
• Bulk client management
• Confidence intervals or repeated sampling

That last point is becoming increasingly important. Because AI responses vary between runs, researchers recommend repeated measurements instead of relying on single prompts to estimate visibility. arxiv.org

If budget isn't a constraint

A stack many larger agencies are moving toward is:

• AgencyAnalytics for executive dashboards and client reporting
• AISEOlytics (or a similar specialist platform) for deep regional AI visibility analysis
• Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit if you already run SEO campaigns there, so AI metrics integrate with your existing SEO workflow. www.techradar.com

For an agency focused specifically on aggregating AI assistant visibility across regions and producing polished client deliverables, AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker is the most balanced all-around choice. If regional AI performance is the core service you sell, AISEOlytics or Tower GEO provide more specialized geographic and AI-native capabilities.

If you're an agency that needs to measure AI assistant visibility across regions and deliver client-ready reporting, I'd prioritize tools that support:

• Multi-client workspaces
• Regional or geo-specific prompt testing
• Multiple AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, AI Overviews, etc.)
• Scheduled monitoring
• White-label reports or client dashboards
• Historical trends and competitor benchmarking

Here's how the current market stacks up:

Best overall: AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker

If your agency already reports SEO, PPC, and analytics, this is probably the smoothest option. It integrates AI visibility alongside traditional marketing metrics instead of creating another reporting silo. It tracks client presence across major AI assistants and generates polished reports that are easy for clients to understand. agencyanalytics.com

Best dedicated GEO platform: Tower GEO

If your service offering is centered on AI visibility (Generative Engine Optimization), Tower GEO is purpose-built for agencies. It supports:

• Multiple clients
• Competitor monitoring
• Brand mentions
• Sentiment
• White-label reporting
• Cross-platform monitoring (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity)

It appears designed specifically around agency workflows rather than adapting an SEO tool. towergeo.com

Best for geographic AI visibility: AISEOlytics

Among the newer platforms, AISEOlytics emphasizes:

• City-by-city visibility
• Geo heatmaps
• Citation tracking
• AI share of voice
• Large-scale monitoring

If you need to compare how a client appears in New York versus London versus Sydney, this is one of the stronger offerings. aiseolytics.com

Best if you're launching AI visibility as a new agency service: Rankability

Rankability combines:

• Multi-client management
• AI search monitoring
• Playbooks and workflows
• Reporting designed for agencies

It goes beyond dashboards by providing guidance for operationalizing AI visibility as a client service. www.rankability.com

A note on measurement quality

One important consideration: AI responses vary between runs, times, and locations. Emerging research recommends repeated sampling rather than relying on a single prompt execution, because visibility can fluctuate significantly. The most reliable platforms account for this with ongoing monitoring and trend reporting rather than one-off checks. arxiv.org

My recommendations by agency size

• Small agency (under 20 clients): AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker
• SEO/GEO specialist agency: Tower GEO
• Enterprise or international clients: AISEOlytics
• Agency launching an AI visibility service line: Rankability

If your clients operate across multiple countries or regions, I'd favor a platform with explicit geo-based prompt execution and historical tracking over one that only reports aggregate visibility. Those capabilities become especially valuable when demonstrating regional performance differences and long-term trends.

If your primary requirements are:

• Aggregate AI assistant visibility across multiple LLMs
• Measure results by country/region
• Support agency workflows
• Produce client-ready dashboards and reports

these are the strongest options today.

Best overall for agencies: ViAudit

ViAudit currently has one of the strongest agency feature sets:

• Geo-tracking across multiple countries
• AI share-of-voice
• Competitor benchmarking
• White-label client portal
• REST API
• Historical trends
• Client-ready reporting
• Multi-brand management

It's designed specifically for agencies managing many clients rather than just a single brand. www.viaudit.com

Best enterprise reporting: Tower GEO

Tower GEO focuses heavily on:

• AI visibility
• Brand sentiment
• Competitor monitoring
• Client reports
• Cross-platform tracking

If your clients are specifically asking "How visible are we in ChatGPT?" this is one of the cleanest reporting experiences. towergeo.com

Best if you're already an SEO agency

If your agency already lives inside AgencyAnalytics, their AI Tracker integrates AI visibility with:

• SEO
• PPC
• GA4
• Revenue
• Existing client dashboards

That avoids another reporting platform. agencyanalytics.com

Features I'd insist on

Not every AI visibility tool measures the same things. The strongest platforms provide:

• Country-level prompt execution
• City/market segmentation
• ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, AI Overviews
• Share of Voice
• Citation/source tracking
• Competitor comparisons
• Historical trend analysis
• White-label PDFs
• Scheduled reports
• API access
• Prompt libraries
• Executive dashboards

One important caveat

AI assistants are probabilistic: the same prompt can produce different answers across runs, times, and regions. The most reliable platforms sample prompts repeatedly over time rather than relying on one-off checks. Recent research recommends treating AI visibility as a distribution rather than a single ranking. arxiv.org

For a digital marketing agency serving multiple clients, my recommendations are:

1. ViAudit — strongest overall for multi-region, white-label agency reporting.
2. Tower GEO — excellent for executive-facing AI visibility dashboards.
3. AgencyAnalytics AI Tracker — best if you already use AgencyAnalytics as your reporting hub.
4. Stratus Analytics — strong balance of visibility tracking and citation intelligence for optimization workflows.