ChatGPT answers, unedited
"I do outreach for saas clients, which backlink checkers have the most accurate historical link data for prospecting?", asked on ChatGPT about once a day from the United States. The last 23 answers, newest first, exactly as given: the raw data behind the SEO Tools live demo.
Week of 24th to 30th Aug 2026 (in progress)
For SaaS outreach prospecting, the “most accurate historical link data” depends on what you mean by historical:
- Finding links that existed years ago (including lost/deleted links): Majestic is usually the strongest choice. Its Historic Index is specifically built around long-term backlink records and goes back to 2006. Majestic Majestic
- Finding the best current prospects + competitor link opportunities: Ahrefs is often the favorite among link builders because of its crawling speed, link discovery, and prospecting workflows. Ahrefs
- Broad agency prospecting with lots of competitive data: Semrush has a very large backlink database and strong competitor backlink reports. Semrush
For SaaS outreach specifically, I’d rank them like this:
| Rank | Tool | Best use case for outreach |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahrefs | Finding active link opportunities, competitor backlinks, broken link campaigns, content gap prospecting |
| 2 | Majestic | Historical research, old competitor links, expired domains, niche authority discovery |
| 3 | Semrush | Large-scale agency workflows and competitor analysis |
| 4 | Moz | Smaller campaigns and quick authority checks |
For a SaaS link-building workflow, I’d typically use:
- Ahrefs → prospect discovery
- Export competitor referring domains
- Filter by: - DR/authority
- Traffic
- “Dofollow”
- Recently acquired links
- Pages linking to competitors but not your client
- Majestic → historical validation
- Check whether a site has historically linked to similar SaaS products
- Find publishers that repeatedly link within a niche
- Identify old resource pages that may still be valuable targets
- Semrush → scale and enrichment
- Prioritize domains by authority, traffic, and competitor overlap
A strong agency stack is often Ahrefs + Majestic:
- Ahrefs tells you who is linking now.
- Majestic helps reveal who has linked historically and disappeared. Majestic Majestic
For SaaS outreach, I’d also pay attention to link velocity and link recency, not just total backlinks. A SaaS competitor with 500 relevant links acquired over the last 18 months is usually a better prospect map than one with 20,000 old directory links.
Behind this answer: no web searches, 4 tracked brands mentioned
ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 2 of 23, 24th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
If your goal is SaaS link-building prospecting, I’d rank them:
- Ahrefs — best overall
- Majestic — best for deep historical discovery
- Semrush — best for recent/lost-link prospecting
- Moz — useful, but not my first choice for historical prospecting
1. Ahrefs — my default for outreach
For prospecting, Ahrefs is probably the best single tool because you can combine historical backlinks + referring domains + anchor text + destination pages + organic traffic.
Its current index reports 35T external backlink historical records, and Ahrefs says its live backlink index is refreshed every 15–30 minutes. Site Explorer also lets you view historical backlinks and filter them extensively. ahrefs.com
For SaaS outreach, I'd particularly use:
- Competitor → Backlinks
- Filter to dofollow
- Filter by DR
- Filter referring pages by organic traffic
- Look at historical/lost links
- Check which competitor pages attracted links
- Find domains linking to 2–3 competitors but not your client
That last workflow is particularly good for building highly qualified prospect lists.
2. Majestic — surprisingly strong if "historical" is the priority
If by historical you mean "show me links that existed years ago, even if they're dead today", Majestic is arguably the specialist.
Its Historic Index goes back to June 2006, and Majestic explicitly retains old/deleted links so you can investigate previous relationships. blog.majestic.comdeveloper-support.majestic.com
That's extremely useful for outreach because you can uncover:
"This SaaS company used to have a link from Site X, but the link disappeared."
Those are often better prospects than completely cold sites because there is evidence that Site X has previously been willing to link to that company/topic.
Majestic also exposes first/most-recent backlink dates, which is useful for determining whether a historical relationship is genuinely old or relatively recent. blog.majestic.comdeveloper-support.majestic.com
3. Semrush — excellent for recent lost links
Semrush is particularly useful when your prospecting window is months rather than years.
Its Backlinks tool currently retains backlink data from roughly the last six months, while Semrush's API also provides monthly historical trends for backlink/referring-domain counts. www.semrush.com
So I'd use it for:
- recently lost links
- newly acquired competitor links
- finding sites that recently started linking to competitors
- link-gap prospecting
- monitoring prospects during an outreach campaign
The important distinction
For outreach, "most historical data" isn't necessarily the same thing as "most useful data."
I'd think of it this way:
| Use case | Best pick |
|---|---|
| General SaaS prospecting | Ahrefs |
| Competitor backlink mining | Ahrefs |
| Find very old/dead relationships | Majestic |
| Recover recently lost links | Semrush |
| Recently acquired competitor links | Semrush / Ahrefs |
| 5–15 year historical research | Majestic |
| One-tool outreach stack | Ahrefs |
My actual workflow
If you're doing outreach professionally, I'd combine Ahrefs + Majestic rather than trying to pick one.
Ahrefs → prospect discovery
Find competitors, identify their strongest referring domains, filter out junk, and prioritize sites with relevant content and actual organic traffic.
Majestic → historical enrichment
Run your highest-value prospects through the Historic Index and look for previous relationships, old links, old destination URLs, and first-seen dates.
Semrush → recency check
Use it to identify recently lost/new links and determine whether a prospect is actively linking in the niche.
The key advantage is that you're not just asking "who links to my competitor?" You're asking:
"Who has demonstrated that they link to this type of SaaS, is still publishing, has relevant traffic, and may have a reason to link again?"
That's a much better prospecting signal than DR/DA alone.
If you're doing scaled SaaS outreach, I can also give you a specific Ahrefs/Majestic prospecting workflow with the exact filters I'd use to turn competitor backlinks into a prioritized outreach list.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-back-link-data.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://blog.majestic.com/index-updates/historic-index-update-5th-dec/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://blog.majestic.com/training/a-guide-to-the-majestic-site-explorer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://blog.majestic.com/development/counting-backlinks-and-our-2021-link-index-strategy/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://it.majestic.com/guides/who-is-linking-to-my-site?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://blog.majestic.com/training/actionable-seo-the-fresh-and-historic-indexes/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://blog.majestic.com/index-updates/historic-backlinks-index-update-8/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://pl.majestic.com/reports/comparator?IndexDataSource=F&q1=&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Week of 17th to 23rd Aug 2026
Answer 3 of 23, 23rd Aug 2026, unknown, mentions 3 tracked brands
If your main use case is SaaS outreach prospecting—finding sites that have historically linked to competitors, old resources, or similar SaaS companies—I’d rank them roughly like this:
- majestic.com — best for deep historical link discovery
- This is the standout if historical coverage is your #1 criterion.
- Its Historic Index goes back to June 2006, and Majestic explicitly positions it for analyzing links that are no longer live and reaffirming past relationships. Majestic Developer Majestic
- Particularly useful for finding former linkers: sites that linked to a competitor's old guide, integration page, statistics page, etc., but don't currently link to them.
- Its Backlink History tool can compare up to 10 domains/URLs over time. Majestic
- My pick for: "Who has ever linked to this competitor?"
- ahrefs.com — best overall for prospecting workflow
- Ahrefs lets you view historical backlinks through its Backlinks report, alongside the normal referring-page, anchor and target-URL data. Ahrefs
- I generally prefer it for the actual outreach workflow: filtering competitors' backlinks, identifying referring domains/pages, evaluating link quality, and turning those discoveries into prospects.
- Its API also exposes historical metrics/referring-domain history, which is useful if you're building your own prospecting pipeline. Ahrefs for Developers
- My pick for: "Find good prospects and qualify them quickly."
- semrush.com — good for trend-level historical data
- Semrush's API provides monthly historical backlink/referring-domain trends. Semrush Developer
- I'd put it behind Majestic/Ahrefs if you're specifically trying to recover individual historical linking opportunities, because the historical API data is primarily trend/count oriented rather than equivalent to having a huge archive of individual historical links.
- My pick for: combining backlink history with broader competitor/keyword research.
For SaaS outreach, I'd actually use a 2-tool setup
Ahrefs + Majestic is probably the strongest combination.
Use Ahrefs to do the normal prospecting:
Competitor → referring domains → relevant pages → filter by DR/traffic/link type → qualify prospect.
Then use Majestic Historic to answer the more interesting question:
"Who used to link to this competitor/resource, even though they don't anymore?"
That second bucket can be extremely valuable for outreach. A site that previously linked to a competitor's integration guide, comparison article, template, research report, or statistics page has already demonstrated topical willingness to link.
One important distinction: historical link data isn't the same thing as a historical snapshot of the entire web. Majestic's Historic Index is exceptionally deep, but its current published Historic data has a different update cadence/cutoff than its Fresh Index. Majestic Majestic So I'd use historical databases to generate prospects, then independently verify that the prospect/page still exists before outreach.
If I were doing SaaS outreach at scale:
Ahrefs = primary prospecting database → Majestic = historical link mining → Google/manual review = final qualification.
If you tell me your monthly prospect volume (e.g. 500, 5k, 50k domains), I can also compare Ahrefs vs Majestic vs Semrush specifically on cost per prospect, historical depth, bulk exports/API, and how I'd structure the workflow.
Behind this answer: no web searches, 3 tracked brands mentioned
ChatGPT answered from its own knowledge, without searching the web.
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 4 of 23, 22nd Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 3 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach/prospecting, I’d rank them differently than I would for a normal backlink audit. The key question is: which tool is best at showing links that used to exist, so you can find sites that have historically linked to comparable SaaS companies?
My ranking
| Tool | Historical link depth | Best use for outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Finding old/lost linking domains and historical prospects |
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall prospecting + validating whether opportunities are still worthwhile |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐ | Competitor link-gap and recent lost-link prospecting |
| LinkResearchTools | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Specialized link-history/recovery work, but less convenient for volume outreach |
1. Majestic — best for deep historical prospecting
Majestic is particularly interesting if your goal is “who has ever linked to this competitor?” Its Historic Index goes back to June 2006, and Majestic explicitly positions it for analyzing historical relationships that aren't live anymore. developer-support.majestic.com
That makes it excellent for things like:
- Competitor domains that have accumulated links over 5–15 years
- Finding publishers that previously covered a competitor
- Identifying old resource pages/directories
- Finding domains that used to link to a competitor and may be receptive to a new pitch
- Domain-change / rebrand / discontinued-product prospecting
For pure historical depth, I'd pick Majestic.
2. Ahrefs — best overall for an outreach workflow
Ahrefs is probably my first choice if you're actually doing prospecting at scale rather than purely researching historical links. Its data distinguishes between live, recent, and historical links, and its historical backlink functionality lets higher-tier plans explore substantially longer periods. ahrefs.com
Ahrefs also reports a very large link database and frequent updates, which matters when you go from “this company once linked to my competitor” to “is this actually a viable prospect today?” ahrefs.com
So I'd use:
Ahrefs → discover prospects → filter → verify current status → enrich/contact.
3. Semrush — very good for lost-link/competitor workflows
Semrush gives each backlink First Seen and Last Seen dates, plus Active/New/Lost status and filters for link attributes. www.semrush.com
The important limitation is that its Backlinks tool's link-level fresh data goes back about six months, although Semrush has much deeper aggregate historical SEO data. www.semrush.com
So I wouldn't choose Semrush specifically because you want a 10-year backlink archive. I'd choose it if you're doing recent competitor link acquisition/lost-link prospecting alongside broader SEO research.
What I'd actually use for SaaS outreach
If you're prospecting for clients, I'd probably run a two-tool setup:
Ahrefs + Majestic
Use Majestic for the historical excavation:
Competitor → Historic Index → referring domains → old links → identify publishers/sites worth pursuing
Then use Ahrefs to validate:
Is the domain still active? → Does it still link to competitors? → What pages does it link to? → What's the site's current authority/traffic/link profile?
That combination is much more useful than simply exporting every backlink a competitor has.
One particularly good SaaS prospecting tactic
Don't just search for current competitor backlinks.
Search for:
Competitor's historical backlinks → lost links → referring domains that are still alive → pages/topics that attracted the original link.
Those can produce some very high-intent outreach targets because you're approaching a site that has already demonstrated willingness to link to that category/product/topic.
For example, if you're doing outreach for an analytics SaaS:
Competitor A historical links → old SaaS comparison article → publisher still active → competitor link now dead/outdated → pitch client's equivalent resource
That's generally a much better prospect than randomly filtering a giant DR/DA backlink export.
Bottom line:
- Deepest historical prospect discovery: Majestic
- Best all-around outreach database: Ahrefs
- Best complementary competitor/lost-link workflow: Semrush
- Best practical stack: Ahrefs + Majestic
If you tell me what kind of SaaS clients you do outreach for (B2B, devtools, AI, fintech, martech, etc.), I can also give you a prospecting workflow that turns historical backlinks into qualified outreach lists rather than thousands of junk domains.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 3 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/1127-why-backlinks-report-shows-more-backlinks-than-backlink-audit-does?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://www.semrush.com/analytics/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v3/seo/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/64-historical-data?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/27-rank?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v4/seo/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://www.semrush.com/backlink_audit/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/1616-referring-domains?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 5 of 23, 21st Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
For SaaS link-building prospecting, I’d rank them differently depending on what you mean by “historical.”
My ranking
| Tool | Historical link depth | Prospecting usefulness | Best use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Finding old/dead links and historical referring domains |
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Competitor link prospecting + lost links |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | New/lost links + outreach workflows |
| Moz | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Supplementary discovery |
1. Majestic — best for genuinely historical backlink research
If your priority is “Who used to link to this SaaS, even if they don't anymore?”, Majestic is probably the strongest choice. Its Historic Index goes back to June 2006, and Majestic explicitly says the Historic Index is useful for analyzing past relationships that are no longer live. developer-support.majestic.com
That's particularly useful for outreach because you can find:
- sites that previously linked to a competitor
- dead/lost resource links
- old integrations/partnerships
- publications that covered a competitor years ago
- domains that have linked to multiple competitors over time
2. Ahrefs — my pick for day-to-day SaaS prospecting
I'd probably use Ahrefs as the primary tool for an outreach operation. Its historical referring-domain reporting lets you examine new/lost referring domains over a selected period. ahrefs.com
The advantage isn't necessarily having the deepest historical archive; it's that the data is extremely actionable for prospecting. For example:
Competitor A + Competitor B → both previously earned links from Site X → Site X is a highly qualified prospect.
You can then combine that with DR, organic traffic, anchor text, target URL, link type, etc.
3. Semrush — very good for recent historical changes
Semrush gives every backlink a First Seen and Last Seen date and lets you filter new/lost links by time period. www.semrush.com
For prospecting, that's particularly useful for queries like:
“Show me sites that linked to this competitor recently but aren't linking anymore.”
Semrush says its Backlinks tool can look back six months for its backlink crawl data, while its broader historical datasets can extend much further depending on the report. www.semrush.com
The setup I'd actually use
For a SaaS outreach agency, I'd use:
Ahrefs → primary prospect database
Majestic → historical/lost-link expansion
Semrush → second-source validation
The important distinction is that “historical data” isn't necessarily the same as “accurate historical data.” A tool may know that it once discovered a backlink without that link necessarily being live now. Majestic's Historic Index deliberately preserves old/dead links, while its Fresh Index is intended to reflect currently observed links. developer-support.majestic.com
So if you're building prospect lists, I'd actually exploit that distinction:
Live competitor links → Ahrefs
Recently lost links → Ahrefs/Semrush
Old/dead competitor links → Majestic
Cross-check important prospects → second index
That combination is much more powerful than simply choosing the tool with the biggest backlink-count number.
If your specific goal is finding SaaS prospects that are most likely to say yes to an outreach email, I can also give you a competitor-backlink prospecting workflow (filters + export columns + qualification criteria) that prioritizes high-conversion prospects rather than just collecting thousands of backlinks.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://www.semrush.com/analytics/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/64-historical-data?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v3/seo/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/77-how-are-backlinks-updated?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v4/seo/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://www.semrush.com/backlink_audit/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://www.semrush.com/blog/biggest-backlink-database-study/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/295-backlink-audit-tool?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 6 of 23, 20th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 3 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach/prospecting, I’d rank them:
- Ahrefs — best overall
- Probably my first choice if you're trying to find old/lost links, competitor link opportunities, and prospecting targets.
- Its live backlink index is refreshed every 15–30 minutes, and Ahrefs also maintains historical backlink records. ahrefs.com
- Particularly useful for finding links that competitors earned but you/your client don't have.
- Majestic — best specifically for deep historical research
- This is the one I'd add if historical link data is your primary concern.
- Majestic's Historic Index has records going back to 2006, while its Fresh Index tracks recently discovered links. ahrefs.comdeveloper-support.majestic.comwww.semrush.comdeveloper.semrush.com
- Its API can return backlink history by month from the Historic Index, which is especially useful for identifying old link relationships. developer-support.majestic.com
- Great for prospecting publishers that used to link to competitors, even if the link isn't live anymore.
- Semrush — good secondary database
- Useful because individual backlinks have First Seen / Last Seen dates, plus link status and attributes. www.semrush.com
- Its API also exposes monthly historical backlink/referring-domain trends. developer.semrush.com
- I'd generally use it as a complement rather than my sole backlink database for aggressive prospecting.
For your particular use case
If you're doing high-volume SaaS outreach, I'd actually use Ahrefs + Majestic together:
Ahrefs → discover prospects
Find competitor backlinks, referring domains, broken/lost links, relevant publications, resource pages, etc.
Majestic → validate historical relationships
Check whether a domain has historically linked to the competitor/client and whether there are older relationships that Ahrefs doesn't surface.
Semrush → additional verification/enrichment
Use First Seen/Last Seen and its other backlink attributes to help qualify the opportunity.
The important distinction is that "historical" doesn't necessarily mean "historically accurate." A tool can have a huge historical index but still have gaps because crawlers don't revisit every page uniformly. Majestic explicitly separates its Fresh and Historic indexes, while Ahrefs says its complete backlink database takes roughly two months to refresh across the web. ahrefs.comdeveloper-support.majestic.com
If I could only pay for one: Ahrefs.
If historical prospecting is the core of your workflow: Majestic becomes much more compelling.
If you're building an outreach data pipeline: Ahrefs + Majestic API is probably the strongest combination.
If you tell me what kind of SaaS links you're prospecting for (guest posts, integrations, listicles, resource pages, competitor replacement links, unlinked mentions, etc.), I can also give you the most effective historical-link prospecting workflow and filters for that specific outreach model.
Behind this answer: 3 searches, 26 results retrieved, 3 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://majestic.com/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://majestic.com/account/api?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer?q=im-overhere.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-back-link-data.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://majestic.com/?IndexDataSource=F&q=majestic.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://pl.majestic.com/backlink-database?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://blog.majestic.com/training/a-guide-to-the-majestic-site-explorer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 18 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 7 of 23, 19th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
If historical backlink accuracy is the priority for SaaS outreach prospecting, I’d rank them roughly:
| Tool | Historical link data | Best use for outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Finding old/lost links and long-term link prospects |
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall prospecting + historical context |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Competitor link-gap prospecting at scale |
| Moz | ⭐⭐⭐ | Good secondary validation, weaker for deep history |
1. Majestic — best pure historical data
For your specific use case, Majestic is probably the one I'd test first. Its Historic Index goes back to 2006, and Majestic explicitly positions it for finding links that are no longer live and analyzing how a site's backlink profile evolved. developer-support.majestic.comahrefs.comahrefs.comdeveloper.semrush.commajestic.com
That's particularly useful for outreach because you can find:
- Sites that used to link to competitors
- Links that disappeared and might be worth reclaiming
- Publishers that have historically covered a SaaS category
- Domains that repeatedly link to companies in your client's niche
- Older editorial relationships that newer indexes may not expose
Its Backlink History report also lets you compare the historical acquisition patterns of multiple domains. majestic.com
2. Ahrefs — best overall for prospecting
I'd probably use Ahrefs as the primary tool if you're doing day-to-day SaaS link prospecting.
Ahrefs currently reports 35T historical external backlinks, alongside a very frequently refreshed index, and provides interactive views of referring domains/pages over time. ahrefs.com
The big advantage isn't necessarily that its historical database is deeper than Majestic's. It's that the historical information sits alongside an extremely useful prospecting workflow:
Competitor → referring domains → historical/lost links → filter for relevant sites → inspect page → outreach.
Ahrefs has also maintained historical backlink collection specifically to distinguish links a site has ever had from links that are currently live. ahrefs.com
3. Semrush — excellent for scalable competitor gap analysis
Semrush is good when your workflow is more:
"Give me the sites linking to these 10 competitors and show me the opportunities."
Its API exposes monthly historical backlink and referring-domain trends, so it's useful for seeing how competitor link profiles developed over time. developer.semrush.com
I'd put it behind Ahrefs/Majestic for individual historical-link investigation, though.
What I'd actually use for SaaS outreach
If you're prospecting for clients, I'd use a two-tool workflow:
Ahrefs → prospect discovery
Majestic → historical validation
For example:
- Take 3–10 competitors of your SaaS client.
- Pull referring domains in Ahrefs.
- Look specifically for competitor links that disappeared, old editorial links, resource pages, integrations, listicles, comparison pages, etc.
- Run the strongest prospects through Majestic's Historic Index.
- Look for evidence that the domain has repeatedly linked to businesses in the client's category.
- Prioritize sites with multiple relevant historical links rather than one-off links.
- Then manually qualify the publisher before outreach.
That last step matters. Historical link count isn't the same thing as prospect quality. A site with 50 historical SaaS links can be a much better prospect than a site with 5,000 random backlinks.
My short answer:
- Best historical database: Majestic
- Best overall prospecting platform: Ahrefs
- Best for large-scale competitive gap workflows: Semrush
- If I could only pay for one: Ahrefs
- If historical/lost-link prospecting is the core service you're selling: Majestic + Ahrefs
One interesting wrinkle: Majestic's Historic Index is enormous, but its currently published Historic Index data is not continuously fresh—the current page shows the Historic dataset through March 2024, while its Fresh Index covers much more recent crawls. developer-support.majestic.comahrefs.comahrefs.comdeveloper.semrush.commajestic.com So I'd use Majestic Historic for deep historical discovery, not assume every link it shows is a current link.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-back-link-data.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://majestic.com/?IndexDataSource=F&q=t.co&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?q1=majestic.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://majestic.com/?IndexDataSource=H&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://majestic.com/?q=sjf.cc&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer/map?IndexDataSource=H&q=rakhibazaar.com&scope=domain&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer?IndexDataSource=H&q=TEERIUM.COM&scope=domain&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-new-lost-back-links.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 8 of 23, 18th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
If you're doing SaaS outreach/prospecting, I’d rank the major backlink checkers like this specifically for historical link intelligence:
| Tool | Historical link data | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Finding old/lost links, historical prospects | Best pure historical data |
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Historical + current prospecting | Best overall for outreach |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Current links + large-scale prospecting | Great secondary database |
| Moz | ⭐⭐⭐ | Basic backlink research | Not my first choice for historical prospecting |
1. Majestic — best if "historical" is the priority
Majestic is unusually strong here because it maintains a dedicated Historic Index going back to 2006. Its current documentation describes that index as its largest backlink database and specifically recommends it for analyzing a site's history and relationships that are no longer live. developer-support.majestic.com
For outreach, that's valuable because you can find:
- Links a SaaS company used to have
- Publications that previously covered the company
- Old partner/integration pages
- Former resource-page links
- Competitor links that disappeared
- Domains that have historically linked to multiple companies in your niche
- Old links you can potentially reclaim or use as prospecting evidence
Majestic also has dedicated Backlink History and New/Lost Backlinks functionality. Its historical reporting goes back much further than the typical "last 12–24 months" view. developer-support.majestic.com
One caveat: historical ≠ "the exact date the link was created." Majestic itself notes that crawlers know when they found a link, not necessarily when somebody originally created it. developer-support.majestic.commajestic.comahrefs.comahrefs.comwww.semrush.com
2. Ahrefs — probably the best single tool for your workflow
Ahrefs is what I'd choose if you're doing actual prospecting at scale, rather than purely historical analysis.
Its backlink database explicitly contains historical records, and Ahrefs says its index is refreshed very frequently. ahrefs.com
The big advantage is workflow: you can move from
competitor → referring domains → specific linking pages → historical/lost links → prospect → contact
without having to stitch together several tools.
Ahrefs also introduced historical backlink collection specifically to preserve links that had disappeared from the live index. ahrefs.com
3. Semrush — excellent complementary database
Semrush is worth having if you're doing high-volume SaaS prospecting. It says its backlink database contains 43+ trillion backlinks and 390M referring domains, with the database refreshed at least hourly. www.semrush.com
I'd particularly use it as a second data source when Ahrefs/Majestic don't surface a domain you expect.
What I'd actually use for SaaS outreach
If you're trying to find people/sites to pitch, rather than simply auditing a client's backlinks:
Ahrefs + Majestic is my preferred combination.
I'd use:
Ahrefs → discovery
- Find competitor referring domains
- Find pages linking to competitors
- Identify linkable assets
- Filter by DR, traffic, language, etc.
Majestic → historical enrichment
- Check whether a prospect has linked to similar SaaS companies historically
- Find older/lost relationships
- Look at long-term backlink history
- Identify publications/directories/resources that have repeatedly linked within the niche
Semrush → validation
- Cross-check important prospects
- Catch domains missing from the first database
- Get another view of current/lost links
The important distinction
For "What links exist right now?", I wouldn't automatically pick Majestic.
For "Who has ever linked to this type of SaaS, even if the link is gone now?", Majestic is probably the most useful specialist tool.
And for "Give me the best overall prospecting workflow with the largest practical amount of usable data", I'd pick Ahrefs first, Majestic second.
If you're doing competitor backlink prospecting for SaaS clients, I can also give you a concrete workflow for extracting hundreds of outreach prospects from 3–5 competitors while filtering out junk links, directories, affiliates, and irrelevant sites.
Behind this answer: 3 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://majestic.com/account/api?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-back-link-data.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://majestic.com/?IndexDataSource=H&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?IndexDataSource=F&q1=LAB-I.NET&type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?q1=majestic.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer/map?IndexDataSource=H&q=rakhibazaar.com&scope=domain&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-new-lost-back-links.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 9 of 23, 17th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach prospecting, I’d rank them differently depending on whether you care about currently live prospects or historical relationships:
| Tool | Historical link data | Prospecting | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best for deep historical discovery |
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall for outreach |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Very good, especially for new/lost links |
| Moz Link Explorer | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Fine, but I'd pick the above first |
1. Majestic — best for deep historical prospecting
If your question is specifically "who has linked to this company/site at some point in the past?", Majestic is probably the tool I'd put first.
Its Historic Index is specifically designed to retain old backlink relationships, including links that are no longer live. Majestic says its Historic Index goes back to June 2006, while its current published index contains more than 21 trillion URLs found historically. developer-support.majestic.com
That's extremely useful for outreach because you can find:
- Sites that used to link to competitors
- Links that disappeared after a page redesign
- Old resource-page relationships
- Publications that covered the SaaS before
- Former partners/integrations
- Old links to acquired companies
- Sites that have repeatedly covered a particular category
In other words, Majestic is particularly good at uncovering "they've already linked to something like this" prospects.
2. Ahrefs — best overall for SaaS outreach
For day-to-day prospecting, I'd probably use Ahrefs as the primary database.
Ahrefs maintains separate Live, Recent, and Historical link indexes, and its historical records include links it has seen previously rather than only links currently live. ahrefs.com
Its current backlink database is also enormous, with roughly 35T external backlinks / 500M domains, and its live index is processed every 15–30 minutes. ahrefs.com
For outreach, the workflow I like is:
Competitor → Best by Links → referring domains → historical/lost links → filter for relevant sites → prospect
The important distinction is that you don't necessarily want all historical links. You want historical links that reveal editorial intent.
For example:
Competitor A had a link from a "Best project management software" article in 2021.
Even if that link is gone, that publisher is potentially an excellent prospect for your SaaS client.
3. Semrush — particularly useful for new/lost-link prospecting
Semrush is strong if your workflow revolves around new vs. lost backlinks.
It records First Seen and Last Seen dates for individual backlinks and lets you filter new/lost links by time period. www.semrush.com
Its API also provides monthly historical backlink/referring-domain trends. developer.semrush.com
Semrush says its backlink crawler updates the database frequently and reports newly discovered links relatively quickly. www.semrush.com
So I'd particularly use it for:
"Which sites have recently linked to my client's competitors?"
That's often more actionable for outreach than a gigantic historical database.
My actual SaaS outreach stack
If you're doing this professionally, I'd use two databases rather than trying to find one perfect checker:
Ahrefs + Majestic
Use Ahrefs for:
- Current competitor backlinks
- Competitor link gaps
- New/lost links
- Referring-domain analysis
- Finding the pages/sites worth pitching
Use Majestic for:
- Deep historical links
- Old competitor relationships
- Deleted/lost links
- Older domains/publications
- Link-history research
Then optionally use Semrush as a third opinion when a prospect is important.
One particularly good prospecting tactic
Don't just export "backlinks."
For each competitor, build a list of:
Historical referring domains → pages they linked to → why they linked → whether that relationship still exists.
Then categorize prospects:
- Currently linking to competitor
- Previously linked to competitor
- Links to 2+ competitors
- Links to competitor's specific feature/product/category
- Previously linked to similar SaaS
- Currently linking to an outdated/removed resource
I'd prioritize #3 and #4 heavily. Those are much stronger outreach signals than simply having a high DR/DA.
Bottom line: If historical accuracy is the deciding factor, Majestic is the specialist. If you want the best overall prospecting workflow, I'd choose Ahrefs. For serious SaaS outreach, running Ahrefs + Majestic together gives you a much better prospect universe than relying on either alone.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://www.semrush.com/analytics/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v4/seo/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://nl.semrush.com/kb/1127-why-backlink-analytics-report-shows-more-backlinks-than-backlink-audit-does?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v4/introduction/available-data/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/64-historical-data?msockid=369d3fea2f936ce3135129542ef56dd9&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v3/seo/url-reports/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/21-backlinks?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://ahrefs.com/blog/historical-backlink-data/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Week of 10th to 16th Aug 2026
Answer 10 of 23, 16th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
If your goal is SaaS link-building prospecting, I’d rank them:
- Ahrefs — best overall for outreach prospecting
- Majestic — best for deep historical link intelligence
- Semrush — good secondary database / competitor discovery
- Moz — useful, but I wouldn’t make it your primary backlink database
1. Ahrefs — my default choice
For prospecting, Ahrefs is probably the best balance of index size + freshness + useful filters + historical visibility. Its current Site Explorer advertises 35T live backlinks and 10+ years of historical data. ahrefs.com
The particularly useful part for outreach is that you can inspect a competitor's backlinks and use historical views to identify new, lost, restored, and previously existing links. ahrefs.com
For SaaS outreach, I'd use it to find:
- Sites linking to 2–5 competitors but not your client
- Links acquired recently → sites that are actively publishing/linking
- Lost competitor links → potential reclamation/replacement prospects
- Resource/listicle/comparison pages
- Links to specific competitor features/use cases
- Author/blogger sites that repeatedly link to SaaS companies
Ahrefs also exposes first_seen/last_seen information in its API and supports full-history backlink queries. docs.ahrefs.com
Verdict: If you're paying for one tool primarily for outreach, I'd pick Ahrefs.
2. Majestic — surprisingly strong for historical prospecting
If by "historical" you mean "show me backlinks that existed years ago, including links that aren't live anymore," Majestic is arguably the specialist.
Its Historic Index currently goes back to June 2006, giving it roughly 20 years of accumulated backlink history. Majestic explicitly positions the Historic Index for finding/reaffirming relationships that are no longer live. blog.majestic.comdeveloper-support.majestic.com
That's extremely useful for prospecting because a competitor may have previously earned a link from a publication that:
- deleted the article
- redesigned the site
- changed URLs
- removed the outbound link
- replaced the competitor's resource
- stopped linking to the competitor
Majestic also records first indexed, last seen, and missing/deleted dates for backlinks. pt-old.majestic.com
And its API can return backlink history by month for the Historic Index and by day for the Fresh Index, which is useful if you're building your own prospecting pipeline. developer-support.majestic.com
Verdict: For pure historical link mining, Majestic is the one I'd add alongside Ahrefs.
3. Semrush
I'd treat Semrush more as a second opinion/discovery source than the definitive historical database.
It can be valuable because backlink databases inevitably have different crawl coverage. A prospect that doesn't appear in Ahrefs can sometimes appear elsewhere. For serious outreach operations, cross-checking databases can uncover additional referring domains.
The setup I'd actually use
For SaaS outreach, I'd run:
Ahrefs → primary prospect database
↓
Majestic → historical/lost-link expansion
↓
Google/manual review → validate the actual opportunity
The important distinction is that "historical" doesn't automatically mean "good prospect." Majestic itself notes that Fresh links have a higher probability of being live, while Historic is particularly useful for past relationships. developer-support.majestic.com
So I'd build your prospecting workflow around link behavior, not just backlink counts:
Competitor link → historical/first-seen date → current status → topical relevance → whether the page still accepts/contains external links → outreach angle
For example, if you're prospecting for a project-management SaaS client, I'd much rather find 20 sites that have recently linked to Asana/ClickUp/Monday.com than dump 5,000 historical referring domains into a spreadsheet.
Bottom line:
Ahrefs for 80% of your prospecting, Majestic for historical digging and finding opportunities Ahrefs misses. If historical backlink recovery is a major part of your service, Majestic becomes considerably more valuable than its reputation among typical SEOs might suggest. blog.majestic.com
Behind this answer: 3 searches, 29 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-back-link-data.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://blog.majestic.com/training/a-guide-to-the-majestic-site-explorer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://it.majestic.com/guides/who-is-linking-to-my-site?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://blog.majestic.com/development/historic-index-update-now-with-flow-metrics-2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://blog.majestic.com/commentary/backlink-index-comparison-fatigue/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://blog.majestic.com/development/earlier-first-indexed-dates-in-fresh/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://it.majestic.com/guides/how-many-backlinks-do-i-have?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://blog.majestic.com/training/learn-how-to-read-link-profile-charts/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 21 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 11 of 23, 15th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach/prospecting, I’d rank them:
- Ahrefs — best overall
- Majestic — best for deep historical link discovery
- Semrush — best for current + recent link acquisition/loss
- Moz — solid, but I’d put it behind the above three for prospecting
1. Ahrefs — my default choice
Ahrefs is probably the best single tool if your workflow is:
competitor → referring domains → identify prospects → qualify → outreach.
Its Link Intersect is particularly useful because it finds sites linking to multiple competitors but not your client. Ahrefs explicitly supports intersecting up to 10 domains/URLs and exporting the resulting referring domains/backlinks. help.ahrefs.com
For historical prospecting, Ahrefs also lets you distinguish live, new and lost links, with historical-depth depending on the plan: Standard has two years, while Advanced/Agency have full history. ahrefs.com
Why I like it for outreach: the data is actionable at the individual referring-domain/page level rather than merely showing that a domain's backlink count changed.
2. Majestic — surprisingly strong for old/dead-link prospecting
Majestic is the one I'd add if historical coverage is your priority.
Its Historic Index spans more than five years and is specifically intended for analyzing links that existed in the past but aren't necessarily live anymore. Majestic maintains separate Fresh and Historic indexes. developer-support.majestic.com
That's extremely useful for outreach tactics like:
- finding sites that used to link to a competitor
- identifying abandoned/dead resources
- finding old editorial relationships
- recovering links after a competitor's page disappears
- prospecting sites with a history of covering your client's topic
For pure historical mining, I'd actually choose Majestic + Ahrefs rather than relying on Ahrefs alone.
3. Semrush — excellent for new/lost-link prospecting
Semrush Backlink Analytics has a very large current backlink database and reports first-seen/last-seen dates for individual backlinks. www.semrush.com
Semrush says its Backlinks tool can identify links going back roughly six months in its Fresh Index, while its API also exposes monthly historical backlink/referring-domain trends. www.semrush.com
That makes it particularly good for:
"Who started linking to my competitor recently?"
rather than:
"Who linked to this competitor five years ago?"
Its Backlink Gap functionality is also directly aligned with SaaS prospecting. www.semrush.com
My practical SaaS outreach stack
If you're doing this professionally, I'd use:
| Task | Tool I'd favor |
|---|---|
| Competitor link discovery | Ahrefs |
| Competitor link intersect | Ahrefs |
| Deep historical links | Majestic |
| Recent new/lost links | Semrush |
| Finding recently emerging prospects | Semrush + Ahrefs |
| Dead/old competitor links | Majestic + Ahrefs |
| Final prospect qualification | Ahrefs + manual review |
If you can only pay for one: Ahrefs.
If historical data is the main reason you're buying: Ahrefs + Majestic.
If you're running high-volume outreach and want fresh prospect discovery: Ahrefs + Semrush.
One important caveat: don't treat any third-party backlink index as a literal record of every link that ever existed. Crawlers miss pages, links can disappear between crawls, and different indexes have different coverage. Ahrefs itself describes its backlink data as directionally reliable rather than an exact measurement. ahrefs.com
For SaaS outreach specifically, I'd optimize for referring-domain coverage + historical links + first/last-seen dates, rather than obsessing over raw backlink counts. A prospect that has repeatedly linked to 3 competing SaaS products is generally much more interesting than a domain with 50,000 backlinks but no demonstrated relevance.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 29 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/1127-why-backlinks-report-shows-more-backlinks-than-backlink-audit-does?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v3/seo/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/501-backlinks-report-manual?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/505-backlinks-indexed-pages-report?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v4/seo/backlinks/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/27-rank?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://developer.semrush.com/api/v4/introduction/available-data/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://www.semrush.com/kb/929-looker-studio?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 21 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 12 of 23, 14th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 3 tracked brands
If your goal is SaaS outreach prospecting, I’d separate “historical backlink accuracy” from “best overall prospecting workflow.”
My ranking for historical link data
1. Majestic — best for deep historical prospecting
This is the one I’d reach for when your question is “Who has ever linked to this company/domain?” Its Historic Index goes back to 2006, and unlike a current-only backlink report, it retains historical/deleted links. Majestic explicitly positions Historic for analyzing past link relationships and links that are no longer live. developer-support.majestic.com
That makes it particularly useful for:
- finding sites that used to link to a competitor
- resurrecting old relationships
- finding publishers that repeatedly covered a SaaS category
- discovering prospects from competitors that have since lost the link
- analyzing older domains that have changed ownership/content
Caveat: Majestic's Historic Index isn't necessarily the best source for when a link was actually created. A crawler knows when it discovered a link, not necessarily when the webmaster placed it. majestic.comhelp.ahrefs.comwww.semrush.com
2. Ahrefs — probably the best all-around outreach prospecting tool
I'd generally use Ahrefs alongside Majestic rather than choosing one exclusively. For actual outreach prospecting, Ahrefs' Link Intersect is especially useful: you can identify referring domains that link to multiple competitors but not your client, then export the opportunities. help.ahrefs.com
So if your workflow is:
competitor A + B + C → find common linking sites → qualify → outreach
I'd favor Ahrefs.
If it's:
find every historically relevant site that has ever linked to this competitor
I'd favor Majestic.
3. Semrush — very good for recent link acquisition/loss
Semrush is particularly handy when your prospecting angle involves recently acquired or lost links. Its Backlinks report lets you filter New/Lost backlinks and specify a time period, plus filter by referring domain, anchor, follow/nofollow, link type, etc. www.semrush.com
I'd use this for campaigns like:
“Competitor X recently lost links from 300 publications — which ones are worth pitching?”
rather than relying on it as my sole deep-history database.
For SaaS outreach specifically
I'd probably run this stack:
| Job | Tool I'd use |
|---|---|
| Deep historical links | Majestic |
| Competitor link-gap prospecting | Ahrefs |
| New/lost link opportunities | Semrush |
| Current link verification | Ahrefs/Majestic |
| Prospect qualification | Your own filters + manual review |
The important thing is don't treat a historical backlink as an automatically valid prospect. A historical link can be from an obsolete page, a dead site, a sponsorship that ended years ago, or a domain that changed completely.
For outreach, I'd score prospects roughly on current relevance + topical authority + evidence they link to comparable SaaS companies + freshness of relationship, rather than simply DR/DA/TF.
If I could only pay for one: Ahrefs for general SaaS outreach; Majestic if historical backlink discovery is the core of your prospecting. Majestic's unusually deep Historic Index is the standout when “ever linked” is the question.
Behind this answer: 3 searches, 0 results retrieved, 3 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 13 of 23, 13th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
If your main use case is SaaS outreach/prospecting, especially finding links that used to exist, identifying publishers who have linked to competitors, and recovering link opportunities, I’d rank them:
| Tool | Historical link data | Prospecting | Best use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Deep historical link discovery |
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall prospecting workflow |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | New/lost links + broader SEO workflow |
| Moz Pro | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Smaller-scale prospecting |
1. Majestic — best for true historical link research
This is the one I'd add if historical data is the priority. Majestic explicitly maintains a Historic Index designed for analyzing a site's link history and recovering relationships that are no longer live. Its documentation says the Historic Index spans more than five years; its current index page shows data going back to June 2006. developer-support.majestic.com
That's particularly useful for outreach because you can ask:
"Who has linked to this company/site in the past, but doesn't anymore?"
Those are often much warmer prospects than completely cold domains.
2. Ahrefs — best overall for SaaS outreach
I'd probably use Ahrefs as the primary prospecting tool and Majestic as the historical supplement.
Ahrefs is particularly good when you want to turn backlink data into an outreach list: competitor backlinks, referring domains, link intersections, anchor text, dofollow filtering, traffic/authority filtering, etc. Its workflow tends to be faster for going from:
competitor → relevant linking pages → qualified prospects → outreach list.
There is also substantial industry/community preference for Ahrefs for detecting lost links and maintaining a fresh backlink index, although those comparisons aren't controlled accuracy studies. www.reddit.com
3. Semrush — very good for new/lost-link prospecting
Semrush is particularly convenient if your workflow is "show me links gained/lost during a particular period." Its Backlink Analytics can filter backlinks by time period and identify when links were gained or lost. www.techradar.com
For an outreach team already using Semrush for keyword/competitor research, it's a perfectly reasonable choice rather than buying another platform.
What I'd actually use for SaaS outreach
Best 2-tool stack:
Ahrefs + Majestic
Use Ahrefs for:
- competitor backlink prospecting
- finding relevant referring pages
- broken-link opportunities
- link intersect
- filtering by traffic/authority/relevance
- building the initial prospect list
Then use Majestic Historic Index to find:
- previously linked domains
- lost relationships
- old editorial mentions
- publishers that linked to an older version of a competitor's site
- historical links that aren't visible in a current-only analysis
The important distinction is that "historical backlink data" isn't necessarily the same thing as "a database of every link that ever existed." Crawlers can miss links, and a link can disappear between crawls. So for high-value prospects, I'd cross-check the historical result against the current index and, when useful, the Internet Archive.
One prospecting tactic I'd strongly recommend
For SaaS clients, don't just export all backlinks.
Instead, build a "former linker" list:
Competitor → historical referring domains → lost links → editorial/contextual links → relevance filter → outreach
For example, if a competitor has 5,000 referring domains, you don't care about 5,000 prospects. You care about the 100–300 domains that previously gave that competitor a meaningful editorial link and are plausibly capable of linking to your client.
That's where Majestic's historical capability becomes particularly valuable. developer-support.majestic.com
If you tell me what kind of SaaS clients you target (e.g. HR SaaS, cybersecurity, fintech, martech), I can also give you a specific backlink-prospecting workflow and filters that I'd use to generate outreach prospects with minimal junk.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?IndexDataSource=F&domains=hg5659.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?IndexDataSource=F&q1=hg5659.com&type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?IndexDataSource=F&domains=cup-cino.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?IndexDataSource=F&q1=LAB-I.NET&type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?q1=majestic.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://majestic.com/account/api?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-back-links-history.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 14 of 23, 12th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach prospecting, I’d rank them differently than I would for a normal backlink audit:
| Tool | Historical link data | Best use for outreach | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Finding sites that used to link to competitors | Best for deep historical prospecting |
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Competitor link mining + recently lost links | Best overall |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐ | Recent lost/new links + bulk prospecting | Good secondary database |
| Moz | ⭐⭐–⭐⭐⭐ | General link research | Not my first choice for historical prospecting |
1. Majestic — best for old opportunities
If your goal is something like:
“Which sites have historically linked to companies similar to my SaaS client, even if the link disappeared years ago?”
Majestic is probably the strongest choice.
Its Historic Index goes back to June 2006, giving it unusually deep historical coverage. It also lets you order backlinks by when they were first indexed and specifically analyze historical/deleted links. blog.majestic.com
That's particularly useful for outreach because an old link can reveal:
- publications that previously covered the niche
- resource pages that used to link to competitors
- outdated competitor mentions
- pages where a competitor was replaced/removed
- sites with a demonstrated willingness to link to SaaS companies
For link reclamation and “competitor used to have a link here” prospecting, I'd absolutely have Majestic in the stack.
2. Ahrefs — best overall
I'd probably make Ahrefs your primary prospecting database.
It has a huge backlink index—currently reporting roughly 35 trillion external backlink records—and its backlink index is refreshed continuously. ahrefs.com
The important distinction is that Ahrefs isn't merely good at ancient historical data. It's excellent for finding recently lost links, which tend to be much more actionable for outreach.
For example:
Competitor → lost backlink → identify why it disappeared → pitch your client's equivalent resource/product
That's generally a higher-conversion workflow than blindly prospecting every site that has ever linked to a competitor.
Ahrefs also explicitly maintains historical backlink records and has tracked historical link status for years. ahrefs.comwww.semrush.com
3. Semrush — useful second opinion
Semrush is particularly useful if you're doing large-scale prospecting. Its Backlinks tool supports bulk analysis, advanced filtering/exporting, competitor comparisons, anchor analysis, and new/lost link research. www.semrush.com
But for deep historical prospecting, I wouldn't choose it over Majestic. Semrush's own documentation says its Backlinks tool can go back roughly six months for lost-link data, versus the much deeper historical indexes offered by Majestic. www.semrush.com
The stack I'd use for SaaS outreach
If you're doing this professionally, I'd actually use Ahrefs + Majestic, rather than trying to find one perfect database.
Ahrefs → identify prospects
- Take 5–20 competitors.
- Export referring domains.
- Filter for relevant topical categories.
- Look at recently lost links.
- Look at pages receiving lots of competitor links.
- Prioritize sites with genuine editorial links.
Majestic → dig deeper
- Run the same competitors through Historic Index.
- Look for domains that linked to them historically.
- Sort/filter by first indexed date.
- Investigate links that disappeared.
- Look for recurring publishers/resources that have linked to multiple competitors over the years.
Then deduplicate the referring domains.
One important caveat
Don't interpret “historically indexed backlink” = “good prospect.”
Historical databases can contain links that were:
- removed years ago
- from sites that no longer exist
- nofollow/sponsored
- sitewide
- irrelevant
- generated automatically
- from pages that Google doesn't value much
For outreach, I'd score prospects based on editorial intent, not backlink count.
A site that linked to 3 competing SaaS products in relevant articles is usually far more interesting than a site that once generated 500 footer/sidebar links to one competitor.
My short answer:
Ahrefs for the main workflow; Majestic specifically when historical depth is the differentiator. If you're doing serious competitor-link prospecting, the combination is considerably more useful than relying on either database alone.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/78052-how-often-is-ahrefs-links-database-updated?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://ahrefs.com/faq?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=dialcorecollections.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=danmartell.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://ahrefs.com/broken-link-checker?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://ahrefs.com/big-data?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=theheirloomacademy.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://ahrefs.com/big-data/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 15 of 23, 11th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
If your main use case is SaaS outreach/prospecting, I’d rank them:
| Tool | Historical link depth | Prospecting usefulness | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best for deep historical prospecting |
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall for outreach |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Strong all-in-one option |
| Moz Pro | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Good, but not my first choice for historical prospecting |
1. Majestic — best for finding old/forgotten opportunities
Majestic is the standout if by "historical" you mean how far back can I discover links that existed years ago? Its Historic Index currently goes back to June 2006, with more than 21 trillion unique URLs found in the historical database. majestic.com
That's particularly useful for SaaS outreach because you can investigate:
- competitors' old referring domains
- links that disappeared from competitor sites
- sites that historically covered your client's category
- old resource pages/directories that may still be viable prospects
- domains that have repeatedly linked to similar SaaS products
I'd use Majestic when you're doing "mine the past for prospects" rather than simply checking a site's current backlinks.
urlMajestic Historic Indexturn0search2
2. Ahrefs — best overall for actual outreach
For day-to-day prospecting, I'd probably choose Ahrefs over Majestic.
Ahrefs has specifically tracked historical backlink status—including links that are removed, not found, or dropped—which makes it very useful for identifying link opportunities from competitors' former backlinks. ahrefs.com
The big advantage is workflow: you can go from
competitor → referring domains → historical/lost links → relevant pages → outreach prospects
without needing to stitch together as many separate analyses.
3. Semrush — very good secondary database
Semrush is worth having if you're already using it for keyword/competitor research. Its backlink tooling tracks how profiles change over time and lets you examine links acquired/lost during particular periods. www.techradar.com
I wouldn't pick it specifically for deepest historical link discovery, though.
What I'd actually use for SaaS outreach
If you're doing this professionally, I'd use a two-tool workflow:
Ahrefs → primary prospecting database
Majestic → historical/edge-case verification
For example, say you're prospecting for a project-management SaaS:
- Put 5–10 competing SaaS domains into Ahrefs.
- Export their referring domains and lost backlinks.
- Filter for sites relevant to project management/productivity/remote work/startups.
- Look for editorial links, resource pages, comparison articles, integrations, partner pages, etc.
- Run the promising domains through Majestic's Historic Index.
- Look for older links that Ahrefs doesn't currently surface.
- Prioritize domains that have historically linked to multiple companies in your client's category.
That last step is especially valuable: a site that has repeatedly linked to competing SaaS products is a much stronger outreach prospect than a site that merely has high DR/DA.
One important caveat
There isn't a universally "accurate" backlink database. Each crawler has its own crawl coverage, discovery timing, canonicalization and filtering. Even current community reports note that tools can disagree substantially on individual backlinks. www.reddit.com
So for historical prospecting, I wouldn't treat a missing backlink as proof that the site never linked to the competitor.
My short answer:
Ahrefs for 80% of your outreach work; Majestic when historical depth matters.
If your particular goal is finding thousands of SaaS outreach prospects from competitors' lost backlinks, I can also give you a pretty aggressive Ahrefs + Majestic prospecting workflow with the exact filters I'd use.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://blog.majestic.com/development/historic-index/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer?IndexDataSource=H&q=TEERIUM.COM&scope=domain&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://blog.majestic.com/company/new-15-year-plus-historic-index/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://majestic.com/?hl=en&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://majestic.com/?IndexDataSource=H&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://majestic.com/?q=sjf.cc&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer?IndexDataSource=H&q=LAB-I.NET&scope=domain&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 16 of 23, 10th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 5 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach, where you’re doing prospecting rather than just auditing your own site, the “best” backlink checker depends on what historical data you mean:
- historical backlinks (links that existed months/years ago)
- lost link discovery
- competitor link mining
- finding sites that have linked to similar SaaS companies before
My ranking for outreach prospecting:
| Tool | Historical link data | Best use case | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | Excellent | Competitor backlink prospecting, lost links, content-led outreach | Best overall for most SaaS link builders |
| Majestic | Possibly deepest historical archive | Old link graph research, niche authority discovery | Best second database to pair with Ahrefs |
| Semrush | Good | All-in-one SEO + outreach workflows | Useful, but I wouldn’t pick it primarily for historical links |
| Moz | Decent | Basic link research | Usually not my first choice for serious prospecting |
1. Ahrefs — best for SaaS outreach prospecting
For finding outreach targets, Ahrefs is usually the strongest single choice because you can:
- analyze competitor backlinks
- filter by new/lost backlinks
- find pages linking to competing SaaS products
- identify recurring link sources (directories, review sites, blogs, resource pages)
- export large prospect lists
Ahrefs says its index includes extensive historical backlink records and is frequently refreshed. ahrefs.com
Workflow I’d use:
- Put a competitor into Site Explorer
- Go to Backlinks
- Filter:
- One link per domain
- Dofollow
- DR 30+
- Traffic > 1k/month
- Recent/lost links
- Export domains
- Enrich with:
- contact info
- author/editor
- SaaS relevance
- guest post/link opportunity
2. Majestic — best historical “link archaeology”
If your angle is:
“Who has historically linked to SaaS companies in this category?”
Majestic is extremely valuable because of its long-running historical index. It maintains a separate Historic Index designed for older link discovery. ahrefs.commajestic.com
Useful for:
- finding old resource pages
- discovering sites that linked to competitors years ago
- analyzing link neighborhoods
- niche authority research
A good tactic:
- Use Ahrefs for current opportunities
- Use Majestic to uncover older, harder-to-find prospects
3. Semrush — good if you already use it
Semrush is useful when your outreach process overlaps with:
- keyword research
- content gaps
- competitor research
- reporting
Its backlink database is substantial, but many link builders prefer Ahrefs/Majestic when backlink discovery is the main job. www.semrush.com
My recommended SaaS outreach stack
Budget-conscious:
- Ahrefs Webmaster Tools/free checks
- Google operators
- Screaming Frog
- Hunter/Respona/BuzzStream-style outreach tooling
Agency-level:
- Ahrefs → primary prospect database
- Majestic → historical validation
- Semrush → keyword/content intelligence
- Never rely on one index alone
No backlink crawler has a complete view of the web, so the best prospect lists usually come from combining indexes. www.reddit.com
For SaaS specifically, I’d prioritize Ahrefs + Majestic over buying an all-in-one SEO suite. The extra historical coverage is more valuable when your goal is building a pipeline of link prospects.
Behind this answer: 1 search, 9 results retrieved, 5 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://gatilab.com/ahrefs-vs-semrush-vs-moz-vs-majestic/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=danmartell.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=tracksino.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker/?target=mein-arztbefund.de&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://majestic.com/?hl=en&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://biztechscout.com/en/article/best-backlink-checkers-2026?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://respona.com/blog/backlink-monitoring-tools/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://searchatlas.com/blog/semrush-vs-ahrefs-vs-majestic/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 1 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Week of 3rd to 9th Aug 2026
Answer 17 of 23, 9th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
If your goal is SaaS link-building prospecting, especially finding sites that used to link to competitors or identifying lost/removed links you can pitch for, I'd rank the major databases roughly like this:
| Tool | Historical link data | Prospecting | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall |
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐+ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best deep historical database |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Good all-rounder |
| Moz | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Fine, but not my first choice |
1. Ahrefs — best for actual outreach
I'd make Ahrefs your primary database.
Its current live backlink index is updated extremely frequently—Ahrefs says its live-link data is refreshed every 15–30 minutes—and it has historical backlink functionality for identifying links that were previously live. help.ahrefs.com
For SaaS outreach, that's particularly useful for:
- Competitor backlink mining
- Finding lost backlinks
- Finding sites that have linked to several competitors
- Filtering by DR, traffic, language, referring page, anchor, dofollow/nofollow
- Finding links to outdated competitor pages/content
- Identifying sites that have demonstrated willingness to link to SaaS content
The killer workflow:
Take 3–5 competitors → export referring domains/pages → find domains linking to 2+ competitors → filter for relevant traffic/content → manually qualify → outreach.
That gives you a much better prospect list than simply scraping "high DR websites."
2. Majestic — best if "historical" is the priority
This is where Majestic is unusually strong.
Its Historic Index goes back to 2006, while its Fresh Index is intended for recently crawled links. Majestic explicitly positions the Historic Index for analyzing past relationships that aren't currently live. it-old.majestic.comdeveloper-support.majestic.com
That makes it excellent for:
"Who has ever linked to this competitor?"
rather than merely:
"Who links to this competitor right now?"
For broken-link reclamation, competitor link history, expired content, old resource pages, and finding former relationships, I'd absolutely keep Majestic in the stack.
One caveat: historical data isn't necessarily the same thing as currently verified data. Majestic itself says Fresh links have a higher probability of being live because they've been crawled more recently. it-old.majestic.comdeveloper-support.majestic.com
3. Semrush — good secondary database
Semrush is useful if you're already using it for keyword/competitive research. Its backlink database and historical backlink charts can be useful for identifying periods of link acquisition/loss.
But if you're paying specifically for link prospecting, I'd generally put the money into Ahrefs before Semrush.
My recommendation for a SaaS outreach operation
If you're doing this at scale:
Ahrefs + Majestic is the strongest combination.
Use them for different jobs:
Ahrefs
→ current competitor links
→ lost links
→ referring-domain discovery
→ content prospecting
→ traffic/SEO qualification
Majestic
→ deep historical relationships
→ links that disappeared years ago
→ historical competitor profiles
→ additional prospects Ahrefs doesn't surface
Then use something like Google/LinkedIn/manual research to qualify whether the publication actually makes sense for outreach.
The important point is that no backlink database is ground truth. They're all crawler-based datasets, and different crawlers discover different portions of the web. Community comparisons also report discrepancies between backlink platforms, so I'd treat the databases as prospect-discovery engines rather than assuming every "lost" link is genuinely gone. www.reddit.com
If I were building your prospecting system
I'd actually score prospects based on:
Relevance × demonstrated linking behavior × organic traffic × editorial quality × relationship opportunity
rather than simply DR/DA.
For example, a DR 55 SaaS publication that has linked to 3 competing SaaS companies is usually a far better prospect than a random DR 80 site.
If you tell me what kind of SaaS clients you outreach for (e.g. B2B SaaS, fintech, AI, HR, dev tools), I can give you a concrete Ahrefs/Majestic prospecting workflow + filters + export columns + outreach qualification system.
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://zh-old.majestic.com/reports/comparator?IndexDataSource=H&q1=uf.cn&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://nl.majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?IndexDataSource=H&q1=fairwork.gov.au&type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/commands/get-back-links-history.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://nl.majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?IndexDataSource=H&q1=%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8B.com.ua&type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://es.majestic.com/reports/site-explorer?IndexDataSource=H&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://ja.majestic.com/reports/site-explorer?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://zh.majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?IndexDataSource=H&q1=adelaidegaol.sa.gov.au&type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://it.majestic.com/reports/comparator?IndexDataSource=H&oq1=minecraftpocket-servers.com&q1=minecraftpocket-servers.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 18 of 23, 8th Aug 2026, gpt-5-6, mentions 4 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach/prospecting, I’d rank them differently depending on what you mean by “historical.”
| Tool | Historical backlink depth | Best for prospecting | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic | 15+ years | Finding old/lost link opportunities | 🥇 Best historical dataset |
| Ahrefs | Strong historical new/lost data | Competitor prospecting + current links | 🥇 Best overall workflow |
| Semrush | Good historical tracking | Large-scale prospecting + SEO suite | 🥈 Good second source |
| Moz | More limited historical depth | Quick validation / DA | 🥉 Not my first choice for history |
1. Majestic — best if historical data is the priority
Majestic has a dedicated Historic Index going back to June 2006, which is unusually deep. Its Fresh Index handles newer discoveries, while the Historic Index is designed for examining the long-term link graph. majestic.com
For outreach, this is particularly useful for:
- Finding sites that used to link to competitors
- Discovering lost links where the referring page still exists
- Finding old resource pages/listicles that have historically linked to SaaS companies
- Investigating domains with a long history of linking within a particular niche
- Expired/dead competitor pages → identifying their former referring domains
The important caveat: Majestic's Historic Index isn't the freshest dataset. Its current published Historic Index has data through March 2024, while its Fresh Index covers much newer crawls. majestic.commajestic.com
2. Ahrefs — probably the best single tool for your workflow
Ahrefs is what I'd use if you're doing high-volume SaaS prospecting rather than purely forensic historical research.
The advantage is combining historical/lost-link discovery with a very usable prospecting workflow: competitor backlinks → referring domains → link type/context → current status → qualify the prospect.
So if you're asking:
“Which tool should my outreach team actually live in?”
I'd choose Ahrefs.
If you're asking:
“Which tool gives me the deepest historical view of who has linked to a domain?”
I'd choose Majestic.
3. Semrush — useful as a second database
Semrush is worth having if you're already using it for keyword/competitor research. It's good for backlink comparisons and prospect discovery, but I wouldn't choose it specifically because historical backlink depth is your primary requirement.
The setup I'd use for SaaS outreach
If you're building lists for clients, I'd actually use two databases:
Ahrefs → discovery
- Pull competitor referring domains.
- Filter for relevant topical categories.
- Look at link type/context.
- Find pages linking to 2+ competitors.
- Export prospects.
Majestic → historical enrichment
- Check the prospect/domain's historical links.
- Look for links to competitors that disappeared.
- Identify previously active resource pages.
- Check whether the site has a long-standing pattern of linking to SaaS/content in your client's category.
That combination is much more powerful than simply exporting “DR 50+ sites.”
One outreach-specific trick
For SaaS, I'd prioritize “historical relevance” over raw authority.
For example, suppose three competitors have all historically received links from the same software comparison site, integration directory, industry blog, or “best X tools” article. That's a much stronger prospect than an arbitrary DR 80 site that has never linked to anything remotely related to your client's product.
So I'd build your prospecting score around:
Relevance × historical linking behavior × current page quality × competitor overlap × likelihood of editorial placement
rather than just DR/DA.
Bottom line:
Majestic = strongest historical backlink database.
Ahrefs = strongest overall prospecting workflow.
Use both if backlink-driven outreach is a major part of your SaaS operation. majestic.commajestic.com
Behind this answer: 4 searches, 30 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://majestic.com/?hl=en&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://blog.majestic.com/company/new-15-year-plus-historic-index/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://blog.majestic.com/training/actionable-seo-the-fresh-and-historic-indexes/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer?IndexDataSource=H&q=TEERIUM.COM&scope=domain&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer?IndexDataSource=H&q=LAB-I.NET&scope=domain&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://majestic.com/?q=sjf.cc&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://developer-support.majestic.com/api/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://majestic.com/?IndexDataSource=H&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 22 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 19 of 23, 7th Aug 2026, gpt-5-5, mentions 4 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach prospecting, where you care about finding who linked to competitors historically, links that disappeared, and repeatable link-building opportunities, the ranking is a little different than “best SEO tool overall.”
My practical ranking for historical backlink intelligence:
| Rank | Tool | Best for | Historical link data quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahrefs | Competitor link prospecting, lost links, content gap outreach | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| 2 | Majestic | Deep historical link graph, old domains, niche analysis | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| 3 | Semrush | Agency workflows, link audits + broader SEO | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| 4 | Moz | Basic link research, DA-based prospecting | ⭐⭐⭐ |
1. Ahrefs — best overall for SaaS outreach
For outreach, I’d usually start here.
Why:
- Strong referring domains database
- Good first seen / last seen link tracking
- Excellent filters:
- “Links to competitors but not you”
- New/lost backlinks
- Link type
- Language
- Traffic estimates
- Anchor text
- Great for finding:
- SaaS comparison pages
- “best tools” listicles
- integration pages
- resource pages
- guest post opportunities
Ahrefs says its index includes large-scale historical backlink records and frequent updates, which is why many link builders use it as their primary prospecting database. ahrefs.com
Best workflow:
- Put 3–5 competing SaaS domains into Link Intersect.
- Export referring domains.
- Filter:
- DR 30–80
- organic traffic >1k/mo
- dofollow
- relevant categories
- Build outreach lists.
2. Majestic — best if you care about old links
Majestic is underrated for outreach because it has a huge historical index.
Useful for:
- Finding links competitors earned years ago
- Recovering old resource pages
- Studying mature SaaS brands
- Analyzing topical neighborhoods
Its Historic Index is specifically designed around older backlink discovery rather than only current links. ahrefs.commajestic.com
I’d use Majestic when:
- Your competitor has existed 5–10+ years
- You’re doing enterprise SaaS outreach
- You want “where has this brand ever been mentioned?”
3. Semrush — good if you already run campaigns there
Semrush is solid, especially if your outreach process includes:
- keyword research
- competitor analysis
- reporting
- toxic link checks
Its backlink database is competitive, but many dedicated link builders still pair it with Ahrefs or Majestic for deeper prospecting. www.semrush.com
My recommended SaaS outreach stack
If you do high-volume outreach:
Ahrefs + Google Sheets/Airtable
- Ahrefs = discovery
- Spreadsheet = qualification
- Email tool = execution
If you do enterprise SaaS:
Ahrefs + Majestic
- Ahrefs finds actionable prospects
- Majestic finds historical opportunities competitors earned years ago
If budget is limited:
Use:
- Ahrefs Webmaster Tools (for owned sites)
- Semrush trial periods for audits
- Free backlink checkers for spot checks ahrefs.commajestic.com
One thing I would not optimize for: raw backlink count. For SaaS outreach, the gold is usually:
- pages linking to 3+ competitors
- comparison pages
- “alternatives to X” articles
- integration directories
- industry resource hubs
- broken competitor links
Those convert far better than chasing every high-DR referring domain.
If your outreach is mostly guest posts, digital PR, or competitor link reclamation, the ideal tool choice changes slightly.
Behind this answer: 1 search, 9 results retrieved, 4 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://gatilab.com/ahrefs-vs-semrush-vs-moz-vs-majestic/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker/?target=befundhilfe.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=tracksino.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=theheirloomacademy.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=rlstore.pt&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://majestic.com/?hl=en&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://biztechscout.com/en/article/best-backlink-checkers-2026?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://www.contenidopatrocinado.com/en/blog/tool-comparison-ahrefs-semrush-majestic-and-moz/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 1 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 20 of 23, 7th Aug 2026, gpt-5-5, mentions 5 tracked brands
If your job is SaaS link outreach and prospecting, I'd separate the question into historical coverage and current link freshness. They're not the same.
Here's how I'd rank them:
| Tool | Historical link data | Freshness | Best use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Overall prospecting and competitor research |
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐+ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Deep historical link analysis |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Good if you're already using the SEO suite |
| Moz | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Supplemental validation |
| SE Ranking | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Budget alternative |
1. Ahrefs — best overall for outreach
For agencies and SaaS outreach teams, Ahrefs is generally the strongest choice because it balances:
- huge live index
- fast discovery of new links
- reliable lost-link history
- excellent filtering
- strong referring-domain coverage
Ahrefs says it updates its backlink index roughly every 15 minutes and maintains tens of trillions of historical backlinks. ahrefs.com
For prospecting this matters because you can quickly answer questions like:
- Which blogs link to competitors repeatedly?
- Which sites recently linked to Series A/B SaaS companies?
- Which publications stopped linking to a competitor?
- Which DR 40–70 sites actively publish guest contributions?
2. Majestic — deepest historical archive
If your question is specifically about historical links, Majestic is still difficult to beat.
Its Historic Index stretches back to the mid-2000s, making it valuable for:
- old link audits
- legacy SaaS competitors
- understanding long-term linking behavior
- finding domains that consistently link within a niche
Its Fresh Index is useful, but the Historic Index is what makes it unique. majestic.comgatilab.com
I still use Majestic whenever I want to know:
"Has this publication linked to software companies for the past five years?"
rather than
"What are they linking to this month?"
3. Semrush — good enough for most agencies
Semrush's backlink database is large and continues to improve.
If your agency already lives inside Semrush for:
- keyword research
- content
- reporting
- rank tracking
then its backlink data is perfectly usable for most outreach campaigns.
Where it tends to lag is very recent link discovery and some historical depth compared with Ahrefs and Majestic. gatilab.com
For SaaS outreach specifically
If I were building prospect lists, I'd use them differently:
Ahrefs
- competitor backlink exports
- new referring domains
- broken backlink opportunities
- content explorer
- "Best by Links"
Majestic
- verify whether a domain has linked to SaaS repeatedly
- evaluate topical authority (Topical Trust Flow)
- identify link neighborhoods
- analyze long-term linking patterns
Accuracy tips
No backlink crawler has Google's complete graph.
When prospecting, I usually trust:
- Ahrefs for "Does this site actively link?"
- Majestic for "Has this site historically linked?"
- Google search operators to verify the site still publishes similar content.
Using both Ahrefs and Majestic often surfaces opportunities one tool alone misses, especially for older domains. Community discussions among SEO practitioners also frequently recommend combining them when link building is a primary workflow. www.reddit.com
My recommendation based on your workflow
Since you do SaaS outreach, I'd rank them:
- Ahrefs — daily driver (90% of prospecting)
- Majestic — historical validation and niche authority
- Semrush — if you need an all-in-one SEO platform
- SE Ranking — best budget option
- Moz — least compelling if backlink prospecting is your core job
If you're prospecting at scale (50k–500k domains), I can also suggest stacks that combine Ahrefs with APIs like Common Crawl, Majestic, and Google BigQuery to uncover prospects that most outreach teams never see.
Behind this answer: 1 search, 9 results retrieved, 5 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://linkgathering.com/comparison/ahrefs-vs-majestic?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://www.semrush.com/blog/biggest-backlink-database-study/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://www.contenidopatrocinado.com/en/blog/tool-comparison-ahrefs-semrush-majestic-and-moz/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://comparegiants.com/comparison/ahrefs-vs-majestic-seo-tool/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://searchatlas.com/blog/semrush-vs-ahrefs-vs-majestic/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://majestic.com/?hl=en&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=theheirloomacademy.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://www.reachgiant.com/blog-post/ahrefs-vs-majestic-vs-seomoz?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 1 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 21 of 23, 7th Aug 2026, gpt-5-5, mentions 5 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach prospecting, historical link data quality matters more than raw backlink count. You usually care about:
- finding sites that used to link to competitors (link reclamation)
- finding patterns in competitor acquisition over time
- discovering publishers that repeatedly cover SaaS topics
- identifying expired/lost links worth pitching for replacement
My ranking for historical backlink intelligence:
| Tool | Historical link data | Best use for SaaS outreach | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Competitor backlink mining, lost links, content-led outreach | Expensive |
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Deep historical link graphs, old domains, link archaeology | Less polished workflow |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Prospecting + broader SEO workflows | Backlink depth is usually not its main advantage |
| Moz | ⭐⭐⭐ | Quick authority checks | Smaller backlink footprint |
| SE Ranking | ⭐⭐⭐ | Budget agency workflows | Less depth for aggressive link prospecting |
1. Ahrefs — best overall for SaaS outreach
For most SaaS link-building teams, Ahrefs is the default choice.
Why:
- strong competitor backlink discovery
- good "new/lost backlinks" tracking
- excellent filters (language, traffic, DR, anchor, first seen, last seen)
- strong content discovery for finding linkable assets
Ahrefs says its index contains tens of trillions of external backlinks and maintains frequently refreshed data, which is why many outreach teams use it as their primary prospecting database. ahrefs.com
Best workflows:
- "Who links to HubSpot but not my CRM?"
- "Which blogs linked to competitor X's pricing page?"
- "Which SaaS comparison pages gained links recently?"
2. Majestic — best if you care about old link history
Majestic is the specialist for historical link research.
Where it shines:
- older domains
- link graph analysis
- seeing historical relationships between sites
- finding long-running industry publishers
Majestic maintains a Historic Index specifically designed for older backlink records, with data going back many years. majestic.com
For SaaS outreach, this is useful when you ask:
"Who has historically linked to companies in this category?"
Example:
- Find every site that linked to old competitors
- Check whether those sites still publish SaaS content
- Build a warm prospect list
3. Semrush — good if outreach is part of a larger SEO stack
Semrush is useful if you also need:
- keyword research
- traffic estimates
- reporting
- client dashboards
I would not usually buy it only for backlink prospecting if historical links are the priority.
My recommended stack for a SaaS outreach agency
If you can afford one tool:
Ahrefs only
Workflow:
- Export competitor referring domains
- Filter:
- DR 30+
- organic traffic
- dofollow
- relevant categories
- Find recurring publishers
- Build outreach lists
If you do high-volume outreach:
Ahrefs + Majestic
Use:
- Ahrefs → active opportunities
- Majestic → historical mining
If you are doing broken-link / competitor replacement campaigns:
Majestic becomes more valuable because old link records matter.
Metrics I would NOT over-trust
For SaaS outreach, avoid judging prospects only by:
- DR/DA
- total backlinks
- domain age
Better signals:
- Does the site publish content in your client's category?
- Does it link externally?
- Does it rank for commercial SaaS terms?
- Did it recently link to competitors?
- Are those links editorial?
A smaller niche SaaS blog with 5 relevant competitor links can be a better prospect than a huge DR 80 site that never links out.
If I were running SaaS outreach campaigns today, I’d use Ahrefs as the prospecting engine and Majestic as the historical research layer. ahrefs.commajestic.com
Behind this answer: 1 search, 10 results retrieved, 5 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://gatilab.com/ahrefs-vs-semrush-vs-moz-vs-majestic/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://majestic.com/help/tools/site-explorer?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://majestic.com/?hl=en&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://majestic.com/reports/site-explorer/advanced-tools?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://majestic.com/?q=xtjm.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker/?target=wordpress.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/78052-how-often-is-ahrefs-links-database-updated?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://ahrefs.com/backlink-checker?target=tracksino.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 2 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 22 of 23, 7th Aug 2026, gpt-5-5, mentions 5 tracked brands
For SaaS outreach and link prospecting, there isn't a single tool with the "most accurate" historical index. Different crawlers discover different parts of the web. If historical link data is your priority (finding sites that used to link to competitors, identifying outreach prospects, analyzing link velocity), here's how I'd rank them:
| Tool | Historical data | Freshness | Best use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | Overall best for prospecting and competitor research |
| Majestic | ★★★★★+ | ★★★★☆ | Deep historical link intelligence |
| Semrush | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ | Good if you're already in the Semrush ecosystem |
| Moz | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ | Secondary validation |
| SE Ranking | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ | Budget option |
1. Ahrefs (my first choice)
For agency outreach, Ahrefs is still the benchmark.
Why:
- Excellent first seen / last seen timestamps
- Strong lost-link history
- Large live index
- Great filtering for:
- dofollow only
- DR ranges
- traffic
- language
- platform
- link type
- Link Intersect is still one of the best prospecting tools available.
If you're building lists like:
- "sites that linked to Competitor A but not us"
- "blogs that link to multiple SaaS companies"
- "resource pages"
Ahrefs usually produces the cleanest results. Ahrefs also notes that comparing raw backlink counts across tools is misleading because each indexes links differently and uses different definitions of "live" versus historical links. ahrefs.com
2. Majestic (best historical archive)
If you specifically asked historical data...
Majestic is arguably king.
Advantages:
- Historic Index dating back many years
- Trust Flow / Citation Flow
- Link Graph
- Anchor history
- Referring domain history
This is especially useful when prospecting:
- sites that used to link heavily in your niche
- expired partnerships
- recovering old outreach opportunities
- identifying publishers that have stopped linking
Majestic's Historic Index contains backlink data stretching back to 2006, making it one of the deepest commercial historical link archives available. blog.majestic.com
3. Semrush
Semrush is fine.
I just wouldn't choose it solely for backlink prospecting.
It's excellent if you're also doing:
- keyword research
- content
- technical SEO
- position tracking
Its backlink database has improved substantially, but most experienced link builders still consider Ahrefs or Majestic stronger for dedicated link intelligence. gatilab.com
My favorite combo
If budget isn't a concern:
Ahrefs + Majestic
They complement each other surprisingly well.
I often find:
- Ahrefs finds newer opportunities first.
- Majestic reveals older relationships Ahrefs doesn't emphasize.
- The overlap is high, but each has unique referring domains.
For SaaS outreach specifically
The reports I use most:
Ahrefs
- Link Intersect
- Best by Links
- Lost Backlinks
- Referring Domains
- New Links
- Broken Backlinks
Majestic
- Historic Index
- Clique Hunter
- Link Context
- Topical Trust Flow
- Backlink History
Those five reports alone can generate thousands of qualified prospects.
If I were building outreach at scale
- Under $100/mo: Majestic Pro
- $130–200/mo: Ahrefs Starter/Standard (depending on usage)
- Agency with multiple SaaS clients: Ahrefs + Majestic
- Already paying for Semrush: Keep Semrush for the broader SEO suite, but add Majestic if your main bottleneck is historical link prospecting rather than buying Ahrefs immediately.
For SaaS link building, I generally see the highest ROI from using Ahrefs for day-to-day prospect discovery and Majestic as the historical validation layer when researching competitor link patterns or uncovering older publisher relationships.
Behind this answer: 1 search, 9 results retrieved, 5 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?q1=majestic.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://linkgathering.com/comparison/ahrefs-vs-majestic?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://www.semrush.com/blog/biggest-backlink-database-study/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://www.contenidopatrocinado.com/en/blog/tool-comparison-ahrefs-semrush-majestic-and-moz/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://seoscaleup.com/blog/ahrefs-vs-majestic/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://searchatlas.com/blog/semrush-vs-ahrefs-vs-majestic/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 1 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
Answer 23 of 23, 7th Aug 2026, gpt-5-5, mentions 6 tracked brands
If your goal is link building outreach and prospecting, there isn't one tool that's objectively "most accurate." Each crawler sees a different slice of the web. But for historical backlink data, there are clear leaders.
Here's how I'd rank them:
| Tool | Historical data | Fresh discovery | Best for outreach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Overall best |
| Majestic | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐+ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Historical research |
| Semrush | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Good all-around SEO |
| Moz | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Supplemental |
| SE Ranking | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Budget option |
1. Ahrefs — best overall
If you're prospecting every day, Ahrefs is usually the strongest single tool because it combines:
- very large backlink index
- fast discovery of new links
- reliable "lost links" history
- excellent filtering
- easy export workflows
Ahrefs says it operates one of the web's largest active crawlers after Google and maintains tens of trillions of historical backlink records. ahrefs.com
For outreach, I especially like:
- Best by Links
- Referring domains over time
- Lost links
- Link intersect
- Broken backlinks
These let you find sites that have historically linked to competitors—even if some links are no longer live.
2. Majestic — best historical archive
If historical data is your priority, Majestic is hard to beat.
Its biggest advantage is the Historic Index, which spans many years of crawled links, separate from its Fresh Index. It also offers unique metrics like:
- Trust Flow
- Citation Flow
- Topical Trust Flow
- Link Context
Its Historic Index covers data dating back to 2006, making it particularly useful for researching long-term linking behavior. majestic.com
I use Majestic when I want to answer questions like:
- "Has this site linked to SaaS companies before?"
- "Did this blog used to do guest posts?"
- "Is this domain naturally attracting editorial links?"
3. Semrush — good but not my first choice for link prospecting
Semrush has improved substantially.
It's excellent if you're already using it for:
- keyword research
- content
- technical SEO
Its backlink database is strong, but for agency link prospecting many SEOs still find Ahrefs more complete for pure backlink discovery. www.semrush.com
What agencies often do
Many link-building agencies actually combine tools.
A common stack looks like:
- Ahrefs → primary prospect discovery
- Majestic → trust/history verification
- Google Search operators → uncover opportunities
- Custom scraping with Screaming Frog or Python
- Internal CRM with enrichment
This gives you the best balance of fresh and historical data.
If you're doing SaaS outreach specifically
My workflow would be:
- Ahrefs → export competitors' referring domains.
- Filter for:
- DR 30–80
- dofollow
- editorial links
- traffic >500/month
- Run the remaining domains through Majestic.
- Remove domains with poor Trust Flow or spammy histories.
- Prioritize domains that have linked to multiple competing SaaS companies—they're often the easiest outreach wins.
If budget allows only one tool
- One tool: Ahrefs
- Two tools: Ahrefs + Majestic
- Already paying for Semrush: Add Majestic before adding Ahrefs if your biggest gap is historical link intelligence rather than broader SEO features.
For pure backlink prospecting, the combination of Ahrefs' fresh crawl and Majestic's historical archive is still one of the strongest setups available.
Behind this answer: 1 search, 9 results retrieved, 6 tracked brands mentioned
Searches ChatGPT ran
Search results ChatGPT retrieved
| # | Page | Used in the answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 2 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?type=0&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 3 | https://majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?q1=majestic.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 4 | https://majestic.com/?IndexDataSource=H&utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 5 | https://pt.majestic.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 6 | https://gatilab.com/ahrefs-vs-semrush-vs-moz-vs-majestic/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 7 | https://linkgathering.com/comparison/ahrefs-vs-majestic?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| 8 | https://www.contenidopatrocinado.com/en/blog/tool-comparison-ahrefs-semrush-majestic-and-moz/?utm_source=chatgpt.com | not cited |
| and 1 more results | ||
Tracked brands mentioned
See where your brand stands in AI
Track how AI talks about your brand, free. 40 prompts, no credit card.
Start tracking free
