ChatGPT answers, unedited

If high sample rate is a hard requirement, I’d look beyond the usual podcast platforms.

My top pick: Cleanfeed Pro

cleanfeed.net is probably the best fit for a freelance producer doing professional audio sessions with clients worldwide. It’s browser-based for the client, supports multitrack recording, very low-latency monitoring, and is specifically designed around remote audio production rather than video conferencing. Cleanfeed Cleanfeed

The important caveat: Cleanfeed doesn't impose a fixed 44.1/48 kHz recording rate in the same way some video-oriented services do; it can use the sample rate supplied by the connected audio interface. RØDE If you're specifically looking for 88.2/96/192 kHz end-to-end remote recording, I'd verify the exact interface/browser workflow before committing.

If you're doing high-end commercial/voice work

Source-Connect Pro is the other one I'd seriously consider. It's more studio-oriented and is widely used in professional voice/production workflows. It supports 44.1 and 48 kHz in its documented remote-transport workflow, but 192 kHz isn't the practical transmission target—the advantage is reliable, professional remote connectivity and integration with DAWs rather than transmitting 192 kHz audio over the internet. Source Elements Support Center

What I'd avoid for your specific requirement

riverside.com is excellent for easy client-facing production, particularly if you need video, but its documented recording rates are 44.1 or 48 kHz. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center

Similarly, SessionLinkPRO is very capable for professional remote sessions, but its recommended interface rate is 48 kHz, and its documentation warns that higher sample rates can cause transmission issues. SessionLinkPRO SessionLinkPRO

My recommendation for your workflow

If you're recording music, VO, ADR, instruments, or other clients where you want genuinely high-resolution masters, I'd use:

DAW + local recording at 96/192 kHz → Cleanfeed/Source-Connect for communication and monitoring → deliver the locally recorded high-resolution files.

That's preferable to trying to make the internet connection itself carry a 192 kHz master. The remote platform's job is to give you low-latency, high-quality monitoring and direction; the actual master should be captured locally.

If you tell me whether you're primarily recording vocals/VO, music, ADR, podcasts, or interviews, I can recommend the best 2–3 platforms and exact sample-rate/bit-depth workflow for your setup.

If you’re recording professional clients worldwide, I’d prioritize local, isolated recording over the nominal sample rate. That way, each participant’s mic is captured on their own machine and a bad internet connection doesn’t degrade the master recording.

My top pick: Riverside

Riverside is probably the best all-around choice for a freelance producer:

• Local recording per participant — the audio isn't dependent on the quality of the internet connection during capture. support.riverside.com
• Separate WAV tracks for every participant, which is ideal for mixing in Pro Tools, Logic, Nuendo, etc.
• Very easy for clients to join from a browser.
• Strong video capability if you're recording interviews, sessions, or content where video matters.
• Important caveat: Riverside's documented audio output is currently 44.1 or 48 kHz, not 96/192 kHz. support.riverside.com

So if by "high sample rates" you specifically mean 96 kHz or 192 kHz, I would not choose Riverside.

If 96/192 kHz is non-negotiable

I'd look at a studio-to-studio remote workflow rather than a typical podcast platform. Most mainstream browser recorders top out around 48 kHz; for example, SquadCast's local WAV recordings are 48 kHz/16-bit. squadcast.fm Cleanfeed likewise emphasizes broadcast-quality audio but is documented around 48 kHz. riverside.com

For serious music production—voiceover, ADR, instrumental overdubs, remote mixing/production—I would therefore evaluate the tool based on whether it can pass and/or capture the interface's native 96 kHz signal, rather than simply advertising "lossless" audio.

What I'd use for your business

For your particular use case as a freelance producer, I'd actually narrow this down further: if you're recording musicians/singers remotely at 96 or 192 kHz, tell me what DAW/interface you use and whether you need real-time monitoring with the client. There are substantially better options than podcast-oriented platforms for that workflow.

For a freelance producer recording clients worldwide, I’d prioritize true remote studio workflows over general video-call recording. The best choice depends on whether you need to capture the client’s performance remotely or mainly monitor/play back your DAW for approval.

Top recommendation: Audiomovers LISTENTO

audiomovers.com

Best for: professional music production, vocal/instrument tracking, mix approvals, label work.

Why it stands out:

• Supports lossless audio streaming up to 32-bit PCM / 384 kHz multichannel. Audiomovers
• Designed around DAW workflows, so you can send your studio feed to clients or collaborators worldwide. Audiomovers
• Supports multichannel sessions and immersive formats, useful for higher-end production workflows. Audiomovers
• Used in professional studio environments, including remote workflows associated with Abbey Road Studios. Abbey Road

Typical producer setup:

• Your DAW → LISTENTO plugin/app → client listens remotely
• Separate call/talkback method (or LISTENTO’s built-in talkback features on supported plans)
• Client records locally if you need pristine takes

For a serious freelance production business, this is the one I’d put at the top of the list.

Strong alternative: SonoBus

Best for: musicians who want a lower-cost, flexible remote jam/tracking solution.

Pros:

• Very low latency compared with browser tools
• Supports high-quality PCM audio
• Works well for musician-to-musician sessions

Cons:

• More technical for clients
• Less polished for commercial sessions
• Requires more setup discipline

Good for interviews/content, less ideal for music tracking: Riverside

riverside.fm

Best for: podcasts, video interviews, content production.

Pros:

• Very easy client experience (browser-based)
• Records locally on each participant’s device
• Provides separate high-quality tracks Riverside Riverside Help Center

Limitations:

• Audio is generally focused around 44.1/48 kHz workflows, not high-sample-rate music production. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center

What I’d use as a freelance producer

For paid music sessions:

1. LISTENTO → remote monitoring, mix reviews, client direction
2. Client records through their own DAW/interface locally when possible
3. Use a separate low-latency voice channel for communication

For remote vocal recording where the artist isn’t technical:

• Consider a managed remote-recording platform plus a simple client guide (interface settings, buffer size, sample rate, headphone requirements).

For your own studio standard:

• Record locally at 24-bit / 96 kHz (or whatever your project requires)
• Use the remote tool primarily for monitoring and communication rather than trusting an internet stream as the master recording

If your work is mainly vocals, mix/master approvals, film scoring, or full-band tracking, the ideal setup changes quite a bit.

For a freelance producer recording clients worldwide, I’d prioritize local recording, separate tracks, reliable file delivery, and the highest available sample rate over just “low latency.” The catch: most remote-recording platforms top out at 48 kHz, because that’s the broadcast/video standard. If you need 96 kHz+, you’ll usually need a more specialized workflow. support.riverside.com

My recommendations:

My pick by client type

For worldwide podcast/interview clients:
→ Riverside. It’s easy enough that non-technical clients can join, while still giving you separate high-quality tracks. support.riverside.com

For music production or recording singers/instrumentalists remotely:
→ Audiomovers LISTENTO + your DAW (Logic, Pro Tools, Ableton, Nuendo, etc.). This is closer to a real studio workflow.

For voiceover and professional post:
→ Source-Connect.

For broadcast-style spoken word:
→ Cleanfeed is hard to beat for simplicity and sound quality. riverside.com

If 96 kHz is a hard requirement

A practical setup is:

1. Record locally on the client’s machine at 96 kHz/24-bit using a DAW or recorder.
2. Use a remote tool only for communication, monitoring, and session control.
3. Have the client upload the raw WAV files afterward.

A “click a browser link anywhere in the world and receive pristine 96 kHz multitrack WAVs” service is generally not the norm yet; most polished remote platforms optimize around 44.1/48 kHz delivery. support.riverside.com

For a freelance producer, I’d probably keep two tools in your kit:

• Riverside or Cleanfeed for broad client accessibility.
• Audiomovers LISTENTO or Source-Connect for premium audio clients who expect studio-grade sessions.

For a freelance producer recording clients worldwide, I’d prioritize studio-quality capture at the client’s location, low friction for non-engineers, and reliable file delivery. The best remote-recording tools are not just “high sample rate”; they also need good clocking, lossless recording, monitoring, and easy session management.

My top recommendations:

My pick for a freelance producer

For music production:
→ Sessionwire + Audiomovers is the strongest combination. You can run a real studio session, hear clients in high quality, send mixes, and keep communication organized.

For vocal recording (singers, VO, ADR):
→ Source Elements is the safest professional choice, especially when clients are agencies, studios, or broadcasters.

For “my client is not technical”:
→ Cleanfeed or Sessionwire. The fewer drivers and settings they touch, the fewer sessions fail.

Important note about “high sample rates”

Many remote platforms do not actually transmit a full 96 kHz multitrack session in real time because bandwidth and latency become limiting factors. A common professional workflow is:

1. Client records locally at 24-bit/96 kHz (or 32-bit float where supported).
2. You monitor a compressed/optimized stream remotely.
3. Files are uploaded automatically or sent after the take.

If you need true remote multitrack recording, look for tools that create local recordings on both ends rather than only streaming audio.

For a worldwide client base, I’d build a setup around:

• Sessionwire for the session room
• Audiomovers ListenTo for premium monitoring
• Dropbox/Google Drive/Frame.io for file exchange
• A client guide with a tested mic/interface setup

That combination is close to how many commercial producers handle remote sessions today.

If high sample rates are a hard requirement, I’d look beyond the usual remote podcast platforms.

My recommendation: Cleanfeed Pro

Cleanfeed Pro is probably the strongest fit for a freelance producer doing audio-first professional sessions worldwide. It’s browser-based, designed for broadcast-quality remote audio, supports multitrack/group sessions, and is specifically used by broadcasters and production organizations. cleanfeed.net

However, there’s an important catch: Cleanfeed’s sample rate follows the connected audio interface rather than giving you a simple in-app sample-rate selector. help.rode.com So I’d verify the exact 96 kHz workflow with your interface and client setup before standardizing on it.

If 48 kHz is sufficient: Riverside

Riverside is arguably the better all-around producer platform. It records each participant locally, uploads progressively, and gives you separate uncompressed WAV tracks, so internet problems don't degrade the actual recording. support.riverside.com

But Riverside's standard audio is 48 kHz, so I wouldn't choose it if you specifically need 88.2/96 kHz delivery. riverside.fm

For your use case

Bottom line: If you're recording voiceovers, musicians, ADR, interviews, or other audio where 96 kHz genuinely matters, I'd start with Cleanfeed Pro. If your deliverable is normally 48 kHz and you want a polished producer workflow with video, guest management, and post-production tools, choose Riverside.

If you tell me whether you're recording music, voiceover, podcasts/interviews, or film/ADR, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 professional options and compare their 96 kHz support, bit depth, latency, multitrack behavior, and pricing.

If high sample rate is a hard requirement, I’d recommend Steinberg VST Connect Pro over the usual podcast-oriented platforms.

Best fit: Steinberg VST Connect Pro

VST Connect Pro

It’s specifically designed for professional remote music/voice recording, rather than primarily podcast/video calls. Key advantages:

• Up to 192 kHz recording, with up to 16 channels. www.steinberg.net
• Uncompressed audio transfer, important if you're delivering files for serious post-production. www.steinberg.net
• Your client can use the free VST Connect Performer app while you control the session from your studio DAW. www.steinberg.net
• Includes cue mix and talkback, which makes it much more appropriate for directing vocalists, musicians, VO talent, and other professional sessions. www.steinberg.net
• Designed specifically for recording people across continents, rather than simply capturing a compressed video-call stream. www.steinberg.net

How I'd rank the alternatives

Riverside is excellent if your clients are primarily podcasters, interview subjects, or video talent: it records separate tracks locally on each participant's device, avoiding internet-quality degradation, and supports 44.1/48 kHz WAV tracks. support.riverside.com

SquadCast similarly records separate local WAV tracks, but its documented recording spec is 48 kHz/16-bit, so it doesn't meet a 96/192 kHz requirement. squadcast.fm

For a freelance producer recording singers, instrumentalists, VO artists, or other clients where you're actually mixing the resulting tracks, I'd choose VST Connect Pro. If you're mostly producing spoken-word/video content, Riverside is the easier client experience.

If you tell me whether you're recording music, vocals/VO, podcasts, or all of the above—and what DAW you use, I can narrow it down to the best 2–3 options for your workflow.

For a freelance producer doing professional remote recording worldwide, my first choice would be Source Elements Source-Connect Pro/Pro X.

Source-Connect

Why I’d pick Source-Connect

• High sample-rate support: Pro/Pro X supports 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4 and 192 kHz at the DAW/interface level. support.source-elements.com
• Designed specifically for professional remote recording, rather than primarily podcasting/video calls. It integrates with Pro Tools, Logic, Nuendo, Reaper, Ableton, etc. www.source-elements.com
• Auto-Restore / Auto-Replace: particularly valuable for paid sessions. If the internet connection causes problems, Source-Connect can recover/replace the remote recording with higher-quality audio rather than leaving you with a compromised take. www.source-elements.com
• Multichannel: Pro supports sophisticated routing and multiple remote sources, which is much more appropriate for music production than a typical interview platform. www.source-elements.com
• It has been built around professional remote production for voice, music and sound capture, so it's a better fit for a producer who needs a "remote studio" rather than a podcast platform. www.source-elements.com

One important caveat: don't confuse session sample rate with transmission sample rate. Source-Connect can operate in a 96/192 kHz DAW session, but higher sample rates may be downsampled for transmission. The advantage is that your production environment can remain at the desired high rate while the remote connection handles the network stream appropriately. support.source-elements.com

What about Riverside or Sessionwire?

Riverside is excellent if you're primarily recording interviews, podcasts, video, or simpler voice sessions. It records participants locally, which is a major advantage, but its audio tops out at 48 kHz. support.riverside.com

Riverside

Sessionwire is another strong producer-oriented option. It gives clients a very easy browser experience and streams your DAW at 48 kHz stereo, with encrypted file transfer and session recording. www.sessionwire.com

Sessionwire

My ranking for your use case

Bottom line: If clients are actually performing—vocalists, instrumentalists, voice actors, ADR, overdubs—and you're charging professional production rates, I'd invest in Source-Connect Pro/Pro X. If the priority is an extremely easy client experience and you're happy working at 48 kHz, Sessionwire is probably the more frictionless alternative.

If you tell me what you're recording (vocals, instruments, VO/ADR, podcasts, etc.) and what DAW/interface you use, I can narrow this down to the best setup and workflow for your sessions.

For a freelance producer recording clients worldwide, I’d prioritize local, uncompressed multitrack recording over the nominal sample rate. That keeps the client’s internet connection from degrading the master.

My recommendation: Riverside

Riverside is probably the best overall fit if you record both audio and video with clients. Each participant records locally and the files upload progressively, so a bad connection doesn't turn your master into a compressed call recording. You also get isolated tracks for post-production. support.riverside.com

Important caveat: Riverside currently records audio at 44.1 or 48 kHz, not 96 kHz. support.riverside.com So if "high sample rates" means you specifically need 88.2/96 kHz, I wouldn't choose Riverside.

If 96 kHz is mandatory

I'd look at Cleanfeed. It's particularly strong for professional audio-only remote sessions and is designed around high-quality, low-compression audio workflows. It is a better direction for a producer who cares more about pristine audio than video/podcast production features. riverside.com

That said, there's an important distinction: 96 kHz support and 96 kHz remote recording are not necessarily the same thing. I'd verify the exact input/sample-rate behavior for your interface and the specific Cleanfeed plan before making it your client-facing standard.

What I'd use professionally

For paid production work, I'd also have clients use a wired connection, headphones, and a proper USB/Thunderbolt audio interface, and record each participant as a separate track. The remote platform should essentially be the transport/control layer—not the thing determining the sonic quality.

If you tell me whether you're recording music, voiceover, podcasts/interviews, or live instruments, I can narrow this down to the best 96 kHz-capable remote workflow for your specific production work.

If high sample rate is a hard requirement, I’d look beyond the usual Riverside/SquadCast recommendations.

My pick: Cleanfeed

Cleanfeed is probably the best fit for a professional freelance producer doing audio-first remote sessions. It’s designed around uncompressed/broadcast-quality audio, supports multitrack recording, and lets you work entirely in the browser—useful when clients are scattered around the world. riverside.com

However: if by “high sample rates” you specifically mean 96 kHz, Cleanfeed isn't the clear choice. Its current documentation emphasizes up to 48 kHz in typical setups, and Riverside likewise tops out at 48 kHz. help.rode.com

If you need 96 kHz+

For genuinely 96 kHz recording, I'd look at a workflow where the client's audio is captured locally at the interface/DAW level, with the remote platform used for communication and synchronization rather than relying on a browser recorder. That's particularly important if you're recording music, voiceover, audiobooks, or material destined for serious post-production.

For comparison:

Riverside's advantage is its excellent local recording architecture: each participant's track is recorded on their own device and uploaded separately, so internet problems don't directly degrade the master recording. But its official documentation currently specifies 44.1 or 48 kHz, not 96 kHz. support.riverside.com SquadCast similarly documents 48 kHz/16-bit local WAV recording. squadcast.fm

So my recommendation for you:

• Podcast/interview/voice work: Cleanfeed.
• Client video + audio: Riverside.
• Music, premium VO, or anything where 96 kHz is non-negotiable: use a 96 kHz-capable DAW/remote-session workflow, rather than a conventional browser podcast platform.

If you tell me whether you're recording music, voiceover, podcasts, audiobooks, or commercial interviews, I can recommend the best 96 kHz-capable remote setup (including the client-side workflow and backup strategy).

If by “high sample rates” you mean 96 or 192 kHz, that changes my recommendation: most mainstream remote-recording platforms top out at 48 kHz.

My recommendation: Cleanfeed Pro

Cleanfeed Pro is probably the best fit if your work is audio-first and professional, particularly voice, music, ADR, interviews, or broadcast production. It’s designed for low-latency remote audio, supports multitrack/group sessions, and is used by broadcasters including BBC, NPR, NBC Universal and others. cleanfeed.net

But there’s an important caveat: Cleanfeed doesn't give you a selectable 96/192 kHz recording mode. It uses the sample rate supplied by your audio interface. help.rode.com

If 48 kHz is enough: Riverside

Riverside is my pick for a freelance producer handling both audio and video. It records each participant locally rather than relying on the internet stream, gives you separate synced tracks, and supports up to 48 kHz WAV audio. support.riverside.com

That's a particularly good workflow when you're dealing with clients worldwide: the guest just opens a browser link, while you retain separate high-quality recordings for post.

If you genuinely need 96/192 kHz

I'd not choose a browser-based podcast platform as the primary recorder. For music/voice production where 96 or 192 kHz is a contractual requirement, I'd look at a professional remote-session system that can preserve the DAW/interface sample rate, or use a double-ender workflow: each performer records locally in their DAW at 96/192 kHz while a low-latency service handles communication/monitoring.

My shortlist for your use case:

For a freelance producer, I'd choose Cleanfeed Pro for audio-only work and Riverside for audio/video work—but if your clients specifically deliver/require 96 kHz or 192 kHz masters, tell me whether you're recording voice, music, ADR, podcasts, or commercial sessions and I can narrow this down to the best professional setup.

If high sample rate is a hard requirement, I’d look beyond the usual Riverside/SquadCast-style podcast platforms. Most top out at 48 kHz—for example, Riverside supports 44.1/48 kHz and SquadCast’s local WAV recordings are 48 kHz/16-bit. support.riverside.com

My top pick: Source-Connect

For a freelance producer working with clients worldwide, Source-Connect Pro/Studio is probably the most appropriate professional option.

• 96 kHz is supported, along with 44.1, 48, 176.4 and 192 kHz. support.source-elements.com
• Designed specifically for professional remote voice, music and sound recording, rather than conferencing/podcasting. source-elements.com
• Works with Pro Tools, Logic, Ableton, Reaper, Audition, Resolve, Studio One and other DAWs through Source-Connect Link. source-elements.com
• Its Auto-Restore/Auto-Replace workflow is particularly useful professionally: it can repair network dropouts and replace the streamed audio with the participant's full-quality recording. source-elements.com
• Supports remote participants globally and up to six simultaneous participants in the current platform. source-elements.com

Important caveat: although 96 kHz is supported, Source-Connect's documentation says 88.2/96 kHz are downsampled to 44.1/48 kHz for the actual transmission. The high-rate source can still be retained/recovered, but you shouldn't interpret this as sending a pristine 96 kHz stream across the internet. support.source-elements.com

Another strong option: SyncDNA Track Record

If you're primarily doing music production/session work, I'd also investigate SyncDNA. Its Track Record feature supports up to 96 kHz capture, multiple participants, encrypted transmission, and recording directly into the host studio's DAW. www.prosoundweb.com

For monitoring rather than primary recording

Audiomovers LISTENTO is excellent if the key problem is letting a client hear your DAW in high quality. It supports 32-bit/96 kHz stereo streaming, multichannel audio, and remote recording. www.production-expert.com

I wouldn't make it my first choice for a complete producer/recording workflow, though—I'd pair something like LISTENTO with your DAW and a proper recording mechanism.

What I'd choose

For your use case, Source-Connect Pro/Studio would be my first recommendation. It's much closer to a virtual extension of a professional studio than a remote podcast recorder.

Source-Connect pricing/current plans — the current Pro/Studio subscription is listed at $105/month, while Standard/Talent is $35/month; Pro is the tier I'd investigate for serious recording work. source-elements.com

If you tell me whether you're mainly recording voiceover, vocals/instruments, interviews, or film/TV ADR, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 tools and compare 96 kHz, latency, local backup, guest requirements, DAW integration, and cost.

If high sample rate is a hard requirement, I’d recommend Source-Connect Pro/Pro X over the more common browser-based remote-recording platforms.

My pick: Source-Connect Pro

Source-Connect

For a freelance producer working with clients internationally, it’s particularly well suited to voiceover, ADR, music overdubs, directed sessions, and professional post-production.

• Up to 192 kHz: Pro/Pro X supports 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4 and 192 kHz sessions. support.source-elements.com
• DAW integration via Source-Connect Link, including Pro Tools, Logic, Nuendo, Ableton, Reaper and others. www.source-elements.com
• Designed for real-time remote direction, rather than simply recording a video call.
• Pro/Pro X includes tools aimed at professional sessions, including Remote Transport Sync and Q Manager for repairing/replacing files affected by network problems. support.source-elements.com
• The newer Source-Connect 4 workflow determines available sample rates from your actual audio hardware, which is useful when you're operating a serious studio rig. support.source-elements.com

Important caveat: a 192 kHz session doesn't mean your client's audio is necessarily transmitted to you at 192 kHz. Source-Connect's documentation notes that higher-rate audio can be downsampled for transmission. The value is that you can maintain the appropriate high-resolution session/workflow locally. support.source-elements.com

If 48 kHz is sufficient: Cleanfeed Pro

Cleanfeed Pro

I'd choose Cleanfeed Pro if you want something much easier for clients to join. It runs in the browser, offers multitrack recording, separate synchronized tracks, producer-oriented controls, and high-performance audio modes. cleanfeed.net

However, I wouldn't choose it specifically for a 96/192 kHz workflow. Its strength is excellent remote audio delivery and low-friction client access, not high-sample-rate production.

And Riverside?

Riverside is excellent for remote video/content production, especially if clients need a zero-friction browser experience. It records participants locally and provides separate tracks, but its current audio recording options top out at 48 kHz. support.riverside.com

So for your use case I'd rank them:

Bottom line: If you're selling yourself as a professional remote producer and your clients may expect 96/192 kHz delivery, go with Source-Connect Pro/Pro X. If the actual deliverable is normally podcast/video/VO at 48 kHz, Cleanfeed Pro is arguably the better balance of quality and client convenience.

For a 192 kHz setup, your audio interface also needs to support it. For example, the RME Babyface Pro FS supports 192 kHz and is a particularly sensible portable interface for a freelance producer.

If high sample rates are a hard requirement, I’d be careful with the usual remote-recording recommendations. Most mainstream browser platforms top out at 44.1/48 kHz, so they’re not really “studio high-sample-rate” tools.

My recommendation: Cleanfeed

Cleanfeed is the one I’d look at first for a freelance producer doing audio-first professional sessions worldwide. It’s designed specifically for professional long-distance audio, is browser-based for clients, and is used in broadcast-oriented workflows. cleanfeed.netsupport.riverside.com

However, there’s an important caveat: Cleanfeed follows the sample rate supplied by the client's audio interface rather than offering its own sample-rate selector. For example, RØDE confirms that Cleanfeed will operate at 48 kHz when fed by a RØDECaster. help.rode.com

So if by “high sample rates” you mean 96 kHz or 192 kHz, I would not choose Cleanfeed without confirming your exact interface/browser setup.

Other options

support.riverside.comsquadcast.fm

Riverside is probably the best overall producer workflow if your clients also need video: it records each participant locally, gives you separate tracks, and has a very easy guest experience. But its current documentation specifies 44.1 or 48 kHz, so it doesn't meet a true 96/192 kHz requirement. support.riverside.com

SquadCast is similarly solid for remote audio, with local WAV recordings, but its published specification is 48 kHz/16-bit, so again it isn't a 96 kHz solution. support.riverside.comsquadcast.fm

For your particular use case

If you're recording voice, music, VO, interviews, or instrumentalists for clients, I'd separate the requirements:

• 48 kHz is sufficient: choose Riverside for a polished producer/client workflow.
• Audio-first / broadcast: choose Cleanfeed.
• 96 kHz or 192 kHz is genuinely required: I'd look beyond the standard podcast platforms and use a local-recording/double-ender workflow, where each performer records directly into their DAW/interface at the required rate and the remote platform handles communication/synchronization.

The last approach is considerably more demanding for clients, but it's the route I'd take if you're delivering 96/192 kHz masters rather than simply wanting the best possible remote interview audio.

If you tell me whether you're recording music, voiceover, podcasts/interviews, or all of the above, I can recommend the best professional 96 kHz+ remote workflow, including what I'd give clients as the simplest possible setup.