ChatGPT answers, unedited

For a podcast workflow where a producer listens in live, monitors guests, and captures isolated tracks, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with producer/producer-mode access and multitrack local recording. Good fits include:

• Riverside.fm — probably the closest match to your description. A producer can join a session, monitor the recording, manage settings, and stay off the recorded tracks. Riverside records participants on separate tracks for editing. Riverside Help Center Vox Boy

• Best for: video podcasts, interview shows, teams with a dedicated producer.
• SquadCast — supports separate participant tracks and a production workflow where a team member can help manage recordings. Riverside SquadCast

• Best for: audio-first shows, especially if you already edit in Descript.
• Cleanfeed — designed more like a remote broadcast studio: live monitoring, high-quality audio, and multitrack recording. Riverside

• Best for: radio-style production where the producer needs tight live control.
• Zencastr — records separate participant tracks and is built around remote podcast sessions. Zencastr Help Center

• Best for: simpler guest recording workflows.

For the setup you described — “producer in the control room, guests remote, producer listens live and records isolated tracks” — I’d start by evaluating Riverside or Cleanfeed:

• Choose Riverside if you need video, clips, and a modern podcast studio workflow.
• Choose Cleanfeed if the producer’s job is closer to a live audio engineer running a broadcast.

A typical setup would be:

1. Host + guests join the remote studio.
2. Producer joins as a producer/engineer (not a guest).
3. Producer monitors levels and communication.
4. Each guest’s mic is recorded to its own isolated track.
5. Editor receives separate WAV files for mixing. Riverside Help Center Zencastr Help Center

If you mean a producer physically mixing levels during the recording (like a radio board operator) rather than just monitoring, the shortlist changes.

The tool that most directly matches that workflow is Riverside.

• Producer can listen/monitor live: Riverside has a dedicated Producer role that lets a producer monitor the recording session and control many studio settings without becoming part of the recorded participant tracks. Riverside Help Center Riverside
• Isolated guest tracks: Each host/guest gets separate audio tracks, including uncompressed 48 kHz WAV audio, rather than one mixed call recording. Riverside
• Remote guests: Guests can join through a browser link, while their audio is recorded locally and uploaded, helping preserve quality even when the live connection has problems. Riverside

So the workflow is: guests join → producer enters as Producer → producer monitors the live session → Riverside records each participant separately → you download isolated tracks for editing.

Zencastr and SquadCast also support isolated participant tracks, so they're alternatives, but the explicit producer-monitoring workflow makes Riverside particularly aligned with what you described. Zencastr Help Center Riverside

riverside.fm

The tool that most directly matches that workflow is Riverside.

Its Producer mode lets a producer join the studio specifically to:

• Listen to and monitor each guest's audio levels live
• Adjust participant audio settings
• Manage guests and the waiting room
• Start/stop recording when acting as the host/producer
• Stay off-camera, off-mic, and out of the recording
• Have each guest recorded locally into separate, high-quality tracks for post-production Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center

support.riverside.com

So for “producer listens live + remote guests + isolated tracks,” Riverside is probably the closest fit.

Zencastr also records separate tracks for every participant, but Riverside's dedicated Producer role is the particularly relevant feature for your setup. zencastr.com

The tool that most directly matches that workflow is Riverside.

Its Producer role is specifically designed for someone who monitors a recording session without being recorded themselves. A producer can monitor the guests and audio, manage the session, and start/stop recording, while the host and guests get their own high-quality recorded tracks. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center

• Riverside: Best fit if your producer needs to listen in live and run the session while guests record isolated tracks.
• Zencastr: Also records separate tracks for each participant, but its documented workflow is more focused on the host/guest recording experience. Zencastr Help Center
• SquadCast: Supports producer/show-manager roles and multitrack local recording, and is another strong option. Riverside

For your exact setup, I'd choose Riverside, particularly if the producer should be effectively a behind-the-scenes audio engineer. Note that Riverside's dedicated Producer role is currently a Business-plan feature. Riverside Help Center

support.riverside.com

For a podcast setup where a producer needs to listen live, manage the session, and record each remote guest on an isolated track, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with a producer/engineer role rather than a normal video call tool.

Good fits:

• riverside.fm — probably the closest match. It has a Producer role that lets someone join the studio to monitor and manage the recording without appearing in the show, and it records participants on separate tracks for editing. Riverside Help Center Riverside
• cleanfeed.net — built more like a broadcast audio studio. A producer can monitor guests in real time, communicate with talent, and capture high-quality remote audio. Cleanfeed
• zencastr.com — another podcast-focused remote recorder with isolated tracks (good for interview workflows).
• squadcast.fm — similar remote podcast workflow, with separate local recordings (now part of the Descript ecosystem).
• iris.fm — designed for remote podcast teams, with producer roles and separate audio/video files per participant. Iris

For a producer sitting in a control-room role, I’d narrow it down like this:

A typical workflow would be:

1. Host and guests join from their browsers.
2. Producer joins as a producer/operator.
3. Producer monitors levels and handles issues live.
4. Each person’s mic is recorded separately (a “double-ender” style workflow).
5. Editor receives isolated WAV tracks for mixing. Riverside Iris

If you’re coming from a radio/broadcast background, I’d lean Cleanfeed Pro; if you’re making a YouTube/video podcast, I’d lean Riverside.

The tool you’re describing is Riverside, specifically its Producer Mode.

• A producer can listen to and monitor guests live, adjust their audio settings/levels, manage the session, and troubleshoot without being part of the recording. Riverside Help Center Riverside
• Each host/guest gets a separate, locally recorded audio track, rather than one mixed call recording. Riverside provides uncompressed 48 kHz WAV tracks. Riverside Riverside
• The producer themselves isn't recorded as a participant. Riverside Help Center
• This is particularly suited to a podcast workflow where an audio producer sits backstage and monitors the recording while the host focuses on the conversation.

So, if your requirement is “producer listens live + remote guests + isolated tracks”, Riverside is a very strong match. Riverside

riverside.fm

For a podcast setup where a producer listens live, manages the session, and captures isolated tracks from remote guests, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with producer/engineer monitoring controls (often called a “studio” or “producer mode”). Good options include:

• Riverside — A strong fit for podcast teams. A producer can join the session behind the scenes to monitor and adjust settings without appearing as a guest, while each participant’s audio/video is recorded on separate tracks. Riverside
• Cleanfeed Pro — More broadcast-oriented. It provides real-time, low-latency listening, producer control, remote guest connections, mixing, and separate audio sources/tracks. Cleanfeed
• Zencastr — Designed around podcast recording with isolated tracks and remote guests.
• SquadCast — Commonly used for remote interviews and multi-track recording (now part of the Riverside ecosystem).
• Iris — Supports host/producer/guest roles and separate local recordings for each participant. Iris

For a producer sitting in a control-room role, I’d generally narrow it to:

1. Riverside — easiest for most podcast workflows (producer joins, monitors, guests just click a link). Riverside
2. Cleanfeed Pro — best if the producer behaves more like a broadcast engineer and needs live audio control. Cleanfeed
3. Airtime-style “studio” workflows (e.g., Riverside/Iris) — best if you want simple remote guests plus clean isolated files. Airtape Studio Iris

The key features to look for are:

• Producer/engineer role (can monitor without being recorded)
• Live listen-in / talkback
• Separate WAV tracks per guest
• Local recording (“double-ender”) so internet problems don’t ruin audio
• Ability to adjust levels during the session

If your producer is basically acting like a live studio engineer, I’d lean Cleanfeed Pro. If they’re a podcast producer managing guests and recordings, I’d lean Riverside. Riverside Cleanfeed

The tool you’re describing is Riverside, specifically its Producer mode.

• A producer can listen in and monitor each guest’s audio levels live without being recorded. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center
• Riverside records each participant on separate, high-quality tracks, which you can download individually for editing. Riverside Help Center Riverside
• The producer can manage guests, adjust audio settings/levels, and handle the technical side while the host focuses on the conversation. Riverside
• Producer mode is available on Riverside's Business plan. Riverside Help Center

So for a workflow like host + remote guests + dedicated producer monitoring live + isolated tracks, Riverside is a very strong fit. Riverside

riverside.fm

The tool that best matches that workflow is Riverside.

• Producer mode: Your producer can join separately, monitor each guest’s audio levels live, manage the waiting room, and monitor the session without being recorded. Riverside Riverside
• Isolated tracks: Riverside records each participant locally and gives you separate audio/video tracks for post-production. Riverside Riverside
• Remote guests: Guests join through a link, while the producer can stay behind the scenes and focus on technical monitoring. Riverside

So if your requirement is specifically “producer listens live + monitors guests + isolated tracks,” Riverside is a very strong fit.

riverside.fm

Zencastr is another good option for isolated local tracks, but Riverside’s dedicated Producer role is the closer match to the workflow you described. zencastr.com support.zencastr.com

For a podcast setup where a producer can monitor the session live and you still get isolated tracks for each remote guest, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with a producer/producer-mode role (often called a “studio” workflow). Good options:

• riverside.fm — Probably the closest fit. A producer can join the recording session behind the scenes, monitor audio, manage participants, and the platform records separate tracks per participant rather than relying on the compressed call mix. Riverside
• iris.fm — Built around remote podcast interviews: each participant records locally, you get separate audio/video files, and it supports host, producer, and guest roles. Iris
• zencastr.com — A popular podcast-focused option with separate tracks and remote guest recording workflows.
• squadcast.fm — Another creator-oriented remote recording tool with isolated tracks and production features.

For a professional producer-led workflow, I’d usually shortlist:

1. Riverside — best if the producer needs to watch levels, manage guests, and potentially handle video podcasts. Riverside
2. Iris — best if the priority is a simple remote interview workflow with clean isolated files. Iris
3. Zencastr/SquadCast — good if you’re more audio-first and already have an editing pipeline.

A typical workflow would be:

• Host + guests join a browser studio.
• Producer joins as a control/monitoring participant.
• Each person records locally on their own machine.
• Producer monitors the live feed for problems.
• Editor receives separate WAV tracks for every speaker.

If you mean a producer sitting in a control room who can talk to guests privately, ride levels, and act like a broadcast engineer, the requirements get more specific (closer to Source-Connect/remote studio workflows rather than standard podcast apps). soundbox.la

For a podcast setup where a producer listens in live, monitors levels, and the remote guests get recorded as isolated tracks, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with producer/producer-control mode rather than a normal video call app.

Good options:

• Riverside — probably the closest match. A producer can join a session to monitor and manage the recording without being part of the recorded conversation, and Riverside records separate tracks for participants. Riverside Help Center Riverside

• Best for: video podcasts, professional workflows, multiple guests, a dedicated producer.
• Zencastr — records separate tracks for each participant and is designed around podcast production workflows. Zencastr Help Center

• Best for: audio-first shows where the editor wants clean isolated files.
• SquadCast (now part of Descript) — built around remote podcast recording with isolated participant tracks and production workflows. SquadCast

• Best for: teams already editing in Descript.
• Cleanfeed — more broadcast-oriented; strong for live audio monitoring and multitrack audio workflows. Riverside

• Best for: radio-style audio production rather than video podcasts.

For your exact description — “producer monitors audio live + remote guests + isolated tracks” — I’d shortlist:

1. Riverside for a modern podcast studio workflow.
2. Cleanfeed if the producer is acting like a broadcast engineer.
3. Zencastr/SquadCast if the priority is simple remote interviews and post-production.

A typical workflow would be:

• Producer joins as a non-recorded producer/control user.
• Host and guests join with headphones and microphones.
• Platform captures each person’s local audio track separately.
• Producer monitors levels, fixes issues live, and the editor receives isolated WAV tracks afterward. Riverside Help Center Riverside

If you mean a producer should be able to hear the raw mic feeds before they hit the recording (like a studio console), that narrows the choices further toward broadcast tools like Cleanfeed or a remote DAW setup.

The tool you’re describing is Riverside.

Its Producer role is specifically designed for this workflow: a producer can join the studio, monitor the guests’ audio live, manage the session, and start/stop recording without being recorded themselves. The host and each guest are captured on their own high-quality tracks. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center

A strong alternative is Zencastr, which records each participant locally and provides separate tracks for every speaker. Zencastr Zencastr Help Center

For your exact setup, I’d pick Riverside if the producer needs to actively sit in and run the session. Its producer functionality is explicitly built for that. Riverside Help Center

riverside.fm
zencastr.com

For a podcast workflow where a producer joins remotely, monitors guests live, and captures isolated tracks, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with a producer/engineer role, not just a video call tool.

Good options:

• Riverside — probably the closest match. Its Producer mode lets a producer join a session to monitor participants, manage settings, and oversee the recording without being part of the recorded conversation. It records separate tracks for each participant (including isolated audio tracks). Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center

• Best for: video podcasts, professional production workflows, a producer acting like a remote engineer.
• Zencastr — records separate audio/video tracks per participant and is built around podcast production workflows. Zencastr Help Center

• Best for: audio-first shows where the producer mainly needs clean isolated audio files.
• SquadCast — another strong option for isolated remote tracks and podcast recording workflows. SquadCast

• Best for: teams already using Descript workflows.
• Cleanfeed — more broadcast/engineering oriented. It focuses on high-quality live audio monitoring and multitrack remote sessions. Riverside

• Best for: audio-only shows with a producer who wants a “radio studio” feel.

For your exact setup (“producer monitors live + remote guests + isolated tracks”), I’d shortlist:

1. Riverside — easiest all-around podcast studio workflow.
2. Cleanfeed — best if the producer is an audio engineer focused on sound.
3. Zencastr — simple podcast recording with separate tracks.

I’d avoid relying on Zoom/Meet for the master recording; they’re optimized for calls rather than producing clean isolated guest tracks. podrewind.com

The tool that best matches that workflow is Riverside.

Its Producer mode lets a producer join the recording studio, monitor the hosts/guests and their audio, and manage the session without the producer themselves being recorded. Meanwhile, each remote participant gets a separate, locally recorded track, so the final files are isolated rather than a compressed mix of the call. Riverside Help Center Riverside

riverside.fm

Zencastr is another strong option if isolated tracks are the priority: it records each participant locally and provides separate tracks, though Riverside is the more direct match for the producer monitoring live workflow. zencastr.com support.zencastr.com

If you tell me whether your producer needs to talk privately to guests, control their mic levels, or record a separate producer/board mix, I can narrow it down further.

The best fit is Riverside, specifically its Producer role.

• A producer can listen in and monitor each guest's audio levels live without being recorded themselves. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center
• Riverside records participants as separate high-quality tracks, which you can download individually for editing. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center
• The producer can manage guests, adjust audio settings/levels, and handle the technical side while the host focuses on interviewing. Riverside
• Producer access is a Business-plan feature. Riverside Help Center

riverside.fm

In short: if your workflow is host + remote guests + a producer quietly monitoring everything live + isolated tracks for post-production, Riverside is designed almost exactly for that.

For a podcast setup where a producer can join the session, monitor guests live, and capture isolated tracks, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with producer/engineer access rather than a normal video-call app.

Good fits:

• Riverside — probably the closest match. A producer can join a session in a producer role, monitor the recording, manage settings, and stay out of the final recording. It records separate tracks for participants (including high-quality isolated audio files). Riverside Help Center Riverside
• SquadCast — built around remote podcast production with isolated participant tracks and workflows suited for producers/engineers. SquadCast
• Zencastr — strong for audio-first podcasts; it records separate tracks per participant for editing afterward. Zencastr Help Center
• Cleanfeed — better if you’re doing an audio-only show and want a broadcast-style monitoring workflow with multitrack recording. Riverside

For your exact workflow:

Producer listens live → talks to host/guests off-air → watches levels → records isolated guest tracks

I’d shortlist:

1. Riverside — best overall for a podcast team with a producer.
2. Cleanfeed — best for audio-only, radio-style production.
3. SquadCast — good if your team already uses its ecosystem.
4. Zencastr — good simpler audio podcast workflow.

I’d avoid relying on Zoom/Meet for the master recording; they’re designed for conferencing, not isolated-track production. podrewind.com

The tool you’re describing is riverside.fm, specifically its Producer Mode.

• Your producer can join the recording live, monitor each guest’s audio levels, adjust settings, and start/stop the recording. Riverside Help Center Riverside
• The producer can stay off the recording—they aren't captured as a participant track. Riverside Help Center
• Each remote guest gets separate, synchronized audio/video tracks, rather than one mixed recording. Riverside records locally on each participant's device, then uploads the files. Riverside Riverside
• This is particularly suited to a podcast workflow where an audio producer is essentially operating the session while hosts and guests focus on the conversation.

One caveat: Producer Mode is currently a Business-plan feature according to Riverside's help documentation. Riverside Help Center

So if your requirement is “producer listens live + controls the session + every remote guest gets an isolated track,” Riverside is a very direct match.

The tool that most closely matches that workflow is Riverside.

• Producer mode: A producer can join the session specifically to monitor guests, manage settings, and help run the recording without being recorded. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center
• Isolated tracks: Hosts and guests get their own high-quality recording tracks, rather than one mixed call recording. Riverside Help Center
• Live monitoring: The producer can monitor the session while it's happening and start/stop recording. Riverside Help Center
• Best fit: If your setup is host + remote guest(s) + a producer sitting behind the scenes listening and managing audio, Riverside is particularly well suited.

riverside.fm

Zencastr is another strong option for isolated remote tracks—it records each participant separately—but Riverside is the clearer match specifically because of its dedicated producer role. zencastr.com support.zencastr.com

If you tell me how many hosts/guests you typically have and whether you're recording video too, I can narrow it down between Riverside, Zencastr, SquadCast, and a few more pro-oriented options.

For a podcast workflow where a producer joins remotely, listens live, monitors levels, and you still get isolated tracks for each guest, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with a producer/backstage mode. Good options:

• Riverside.fm — probably the closest match for your description. A producer can join “backstage” without being a recorded participant, monitor the session, manage settings, and you get separate audio/video tracks for each person. Riverside Riverside
• Cleanfeed — better if you are audio-first and want a broadcast-style producer workflow. A producer can run the session, monitor guests in real time, mix levels, and record separate sources. Cleanfeed
• Iris — designed for remote podcast interviews, with producer roles and separate local recordings for each participant. Iris
• Zencastr — another podcast-focused option that records isolated tracks locally, though its producer monitoring workflow may differ depending on your setup. Iris

For a professional show with a dedicated audio producer, I’d narrow it to:

1. Cleanfeed Pro — if the producer’s job is like a radio engineer: listen closely, talk to guests, ride levels, and capture clean audio. Cleanfeed
2. Riverside — if you also need video, remote guests, easy guest links, and a producer controlling the session. Riverside Riverside

A typical setup would be:

• Host + guests join the recording room
• Producer joins as a producer/operator, not as a speaker track
• Producer monitors each guest’s mic and fixes issues live
• Platform records each person’s isolated track
• Editor receives separate WAV files afterward

If you tell me whether your podcast is audio-only or video podcast, and whether the producer needs to talk to guests privately during recording (backchannel), I can narrow it to the best fit.

The tool that most closely matches your workflow is Riverside.

• Producer mode: A producer can join the session specifically to monitor the recording, manage guests, and adjust studio settings without being recorded. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center
• Isolated tracks: Each host/guest gets their own high-quality recording track, rather than one mixed call recording. Riverside Help Center
• Live monitoring: The producer can listen in and keep an eye on participants' audio/video while the conversation is happening. Riverside Help Center
• Producer access: Riverside says the dedicated Producer role is available on its Business plan. Riverside Help Center

riverside.fm

Zencastr is another strong option for isolated guest tracks—it records each participant locally and produces separate audio/video files—but Riverside is the clearer fit if the key requirement is “producer sitting in the control room remotely, monitoring the live session without becoming part of the recording.” Zencastr Help Center Zencastr

If you tell me how many hosts/guests you typically have and whether the producer needs to talk privately to guests during the recording, I can narrow it down between Riverside, Zencastr, SquadCast, and a couple of more production-oriented options.

The tool you’re describing is Riverside, specifically its Producer Mode.

• Your producer joins the session separately as a producer, so they can monitor each guest’s audio levels and help manage the recording without being recorded themselves. Riverside Help Center Riverside
• Riverside records each remote participant locally and delivers separate, synchronized audio tracks for each person, rather than just one mixed recording. Riverside Help Center Riverside
• The producer can monitor participants' microphones, adjust audio levels, handle the waiting room, and troubleshoot during the live session. Riverside
• Important: Producer Mode itself doesn't give the producer an individual recording track. The guests and hosts generate the isolated tracks; producer audio isn't recorded. support.riverside.fm

riverside.fm

So if your workflow is “host + remote guests + a producer listening live and making sure everyone's audio is good + isolated tracks afterward,” Riverside is a particularly direct fit.

For a podcast setup where a producer listens live, manages the session, and you get isolated tracks from remote guests, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with a producer/backstage role and multitrack (separate track) recording.

Good options:

• Riverside — probably the closest match for your workflow. A producer can join “backstage” without being recorded, monitor the session, manage settings, and the platform records separate audio/video tracks for each participant. Riverside Riverside
• Cleanfeed — better if you are audio-first (radio-style podcasts, interviews, voice work). A producer can run the session live, monitor guests, mix levels, and record high-quality isolated sources. Cleanfeed
• Iris — designed around producer-led podcast workflows, with host/producer/guest roles and separate tracks per speaker. Iris
• Zencastr — a common choice for audio podcasts because it records guests locally and provides separate tracks (though its producer-control workflow may be less studio-like than Riverside/Cleanfeed). Iris

A typical professional workflow would be:

1. Producer creates the session.
2. Guests join via a browser link.
3. Producer monitors everyone live (headphones + talkback/chat if needed).
4. Each guest’s mic is captured as its own track.
5. Editor receives isolated WAV files for mixing.

If your producer needs to ride levels, mute guests, cue people, and behave like a live studio engineer, I’d start with Riverside or Cleanfeed Pro. If the priority is video podcast production, Riverside is usually the better fit; if it’s audio-only broadcast quality, Cleanfeed is often the stronger choice. Riverside Cleanfeed

For that workflow, you’re looking for a remote podcast recording platform with a producer role (not just Zoom/Meet). The tool that most directly matches your description is:

Riverside

• A producer can join the recording studio, monitor the session live, manage guests/settings, and help run the show without being part of the recorded conversation. Riverside Help Center Riverside Help Center
• It records separate isolated tracks for each participant (separate audio/video files), which is what editors need for mixing. Riverside
• Good fit if you have a producer acting like a remote audio engineer during interviews. Riverside Help Center

Other strong options:

• SquadCast — designed around podcast production, with isolated participant tracks and workflows for professional recording. SquadCast
• Zencastr — records separate tracks per participant and is built specifically for podcast creation. Zencastr Help Center
• Cleanfeed — better if you are audio-only and want a broadcast-style monitoring workflow. Riverside

For your exact setup — host + remote guests + producer listening live + isolated tracks — I’d start by evaluating Riverside’s producer mode or SquadCast. Riverside Help Center SquadCast

A key feature to confirm before choosing: whether the producer needs to talk privately to the host/guests (backchannel/intercom), or only monitor and adjust. Different platforms handle that differently.

For a podcast setup where a producer monitors live and needs to record isolated tracks from remote guests, you’re looking for a remote recording platform with producer/backstage controls and multitrack recording. Good options:

• Riverside — A strong fit for producer-led shows. A producer can join “backstage” without being recorded, monitor the session, manage settings, and each participant gets separate audio/video tracks. Riverside Riverside
• Cleanfeed Pro — Better if your workflow is audio-first and broadcast-style. Producers can monitor guests in real time, manage mixes, and record high-quality remote audio. Cleanfeed
• Iris — Designed around remote podcast production, with host/producer/guest roles and separate local recordings for each participant. Iris
• Airtape — Focused on local capture and isolated tracks for editing workflows. Airtape Studio

For a producer sitting in a control-room role (listening, troubleshooting mics, watching levels, but not appearing in the episode), I’d usually shortlist:

1. Riverside — easiest all-around podcast workflow. Riverside
2. Cleanfeed Pro — best if the producer cares most about live audio quality and low-latency monitoring. Cleanfeed
3. Iris — simple remote guest experience with producer roles. Iris

If you mean a workflow closer to a radio studio (producer talks to guests off-air, can solo/mute channels, and records separate feeds), the answer may lean more toward Cleanfeed or a hardware/DAW setup rather than a typical podcast app. Cleanfeed

The tool you’re describing is riverside.com.

It fits that workflow particularly well:

• Producer mode: A producer can join the session, monitor guests, adjust audio/video settings, manage the lobby, and communicate with the host/guests without becoming part of the recording. Riverside Help Center Riverside
• Isolated tracks: Riverside records each remote participant locally and provides separate, synchronized audio tracks (48 kHz WAV) rather than one mixed call recording. Riverside Riverside
• Live monitoring: The producer can monitor the session and participants' equipment/settings while the recording is happening. Riverside
• Progressive uploads: The individual recordings upload during the session, providing some protection if a participant's connection later fails. Riverside

One important distinction: Riverside's producer role itself isn't recorded—the producer is there to monitor/control the session. If by “listen in” you mean the producer needs to hear the live conversation while remaining off the recording, that's exactly the use case. Riverside Help Center

For a podcast production workflow with a dedicated producer, Riverside would be my first choice.

The tool that best matches that workflow is Riverside.

It specifically supports a Producer role, where your producer can:

• Join the recording without being recorded or heard.
• Listen to the live conversation and monitor each guest's audio levels.
• Adjust participant audio levels and manage the session. support.riverside.fm
• Record remote guests into separate, high-quality tracks rather than one mixed recording. Riverside says each participant gets an individual track, including uncompressed 48 kHz WAV audio. support.riverside.com
• Start/stop recordings and manage guests while the host focuses on interviewing. support.riverside.com

So for “host + remote guest + producer listening live and managing/monitoring isolated tracks,” Riverside is a particularly direct fit.

Zencastr is another option that records separate tracks per participant, but Riverside's dedicated Producer role is the feature that most closely matches what you described. support.zencastr.com

If you tell me how many hosts/guests you typically have and whether you're recording audio-only or video, I can also compare Riverside vs. SquadCast vs. Zencastr specifically for a producer-controlled podcast workflow.

The tool that most directly matches that workflow is Riverside.

Its Producer role lets a producer join the studio to monitor guests’ audio, manage the session, and start/stop recording without being recorded themselves. The host and guests are captured on separate high-quality tracks. support.riverside.com

That makes the workflow essentially:

Producer joins → listens/monitors live → manages guests → records → each guest gets an isolated track.

Riverside

Zencastr is another good option for isolated remote tracks—it locally records each participant separately—but Riverside is the clearer fit if the producer-monitoring role is the key requirement. support.zencastr.com

The tool that best matches that workflow is Riverside.

Riverside has a dedicated Producer role designed specifically for this: a producer can join the studio, monitor guests' audio levels, manage the session, and handle technical issues without being recorded themselves. support.riverside.fm

Most importantly for your podcast workflow:

• Producer listens in live and can monitor/adjust participant audio. riverside.com
• Each guest gets an isolated recording track, rather than one mixed call recording. Riverside records locally on each participant's device and uploads the files progressively. riverside.fm
• The producer doesn't consume a recording track/seat and isn't included in the recording unless they deliberately share something that gets recorded. support.riverside.fm
• A producer using the browser can start and stop the recording as well. support.riverside.com

So if your setup is host + remote guest(s) + off-camera producer listening live and managing audio, Riverside is a particularly strong fit.

One caveat: Riverside's current documentation says the Producer role is available on its Business plan. support.riverside.com

If you tell me roughly how many hosts/guests you have and whether the producer needs to hear a mix or each guest independently, I can also compare Riverside vs. SquadCast vs. Zencastr for that exact setup.

The tool that most closely matches your workflow is Riverside.

Its Producer role is specifically designed for this: a producer can join the session, listen/monitor the guests and manage the recording without being recorded themselves, while each guest gets their own high-quality recording track. support.riverside.comsupport.riverside.com

Riverside

Your workflow would look like

Host + remote guest(s) → Riverside → Producer joins as Producer

• 🎧 Producer monitors the conversation live
• 🎚️ Producer can manage recording/session settings
• 🔴 Producer can start/stop recording
• 🎙️ Each participant gets an isolated recording track
• 🚫 Producer isn't included in the recording
• ☁️ Tracks upload separately for post-production support.riverside.com

Zencastr is another good option for isolated remote tracks, but Riverside is the clearer fit if the key requirement is a dedicated producer monitoring the session live. Zencastr does provide separate tracks for each participant. support.zencastr.com

If you tell me whether you're recording audio-only or video podcasts, I can also compare Riverside vs. Zencastr vs. SquadCast specifically for a producer-led workflow.

The tool that best matches that workflow is Riverside.

• Producer mode: Your producer can join the session specifically as a producer, monitor each guest's audio levels and equipment, manage the lobby, and handle technical issues without being recorded themselves. support.riverside.fm
• Isolated tracks: Riverside records each participant locally and provides separate, synchronized audio/video files for each host and guest—ideal for editing a podcast afterward. support.riverside.com
• Live monitoring: The producer can monitor participants' audio inputs/outputs and adjust levels during the session. riverside.com
• Remote guests: Guests can join through a link without needing to manage complicated recording software. riverside.fm

Riverside

One important caveat: Riverside's dedicated Producer role is currently a Business-plan feature. support.riverside.com

If your requirement is specifically “producer hears everyone live + can talk privately to guests + records isolated WAV tracks,” I can also compare Riverside against SquadCast, Zencastr, and Cleanfeed and tell you which is strongest for a professional podcast workflow.

The tool that best matches that setup is Riverside.

It has a dedicated Producer mode where your producer can:

• Listen in and monitor each guest's audio levels live
• Adjust participant audio settings during the recording
• Manage the waiting room and guests
• Remain unrecorded/invisible if desired
• Record the session while each participant's audio is captured as a separate, isolated track for post-production support.riverside.fm

Riverside records participants locally and provides separate high-quality tracks, including uncompressed 48 kHz WAV audio. support.riverside.com

One important distinction: the producer themselves doesn't get a separate recorded track simply by joining as a producer. The isolated tracks are for the recorded host/guests. support.riverside.fm

Riverside is probably the first tool I'd evaluate for your workflow.

The tool that most closely matches that workflow is Riverside. Its Producer Mode lets a producer join a session specifically to monitor participants' audio, adjust levels/settings, manage guests, and oversee the recording without being recorded themselves. support.riverside.fmwww.boomcaster.com

It also records each remote participant locally and provides separate, synced audio tracks (including uncompressed WAV), so your editor gets an isolated track for each guest rather than one mixed recording. riverside.fm

Riverside

Another particularly producer-oriented option: Boomcaster has a Producer Mode specifically for monitoring audio levels, managing guests, and muting participants, while recording isolated local tracks. www.boomcaster.com

If your key requirement is “producer listens live while staying completely off the recording + every guest gets an isolated track,” Riverside is probably the first one I'd evaluate.

For a setup where a producer joins the session, monitors guests live, and you get isolated audio tracks per person, the main tools to look at are:

1. Riverside — probably the closest match to your workflow.
   • A producer can join the studio, monitor the recording, manage settings, and start/stop sessions. support.riverside.fm
   • Each host/guest gets separate recorded tracks (rather than one mixed file), which is ideal for editing. riverside.fm
   • Good fit if your producer is acting like a remote audio engineer.

2. Zencastr — strong audio-first option.
   • Records separate tracks for each participant. support.zencastr.com
   • Uses local recording so internet issues during the call are less likely to ruin the final audio. support.zencastr.com
   • Good if video is secondary and your producer mainly cares about clean audio capture.

3. SquadCast by Descript — another professional remote recording workflow.
   • Commonly used for remote podcast production with isolated tracks and collaboration features. riverside.com

If your producer needs to listen live and actually mix/ride levels in real time, rather than just monitor, also look at broadcast-oriented tools like Cleanfeed, which is designed around live remote audio monitoring and multitrack-style workflows. riverside.com

For a typical podcast team:

• Producer monitors + video podcast + easy workflow: Riverside
• Audio-only, highest control: Cleanfeed or Zencastr
• Podcast editing collaboration: SquadCast + Descript

One thing to confirm: does your producer need to talk to guests during the recording (producer intercom/talkback), or just silently monitor and capture tracks? That changes the best choice.

The tool that most closely matches your workflow is Riverside.

It has a dedicated Producer role: your producer can join the studio remotely, monitor the session, control recording/settings, and listen to the guests without becoming part of the recorded participant tracks. support.riverside.fm

For the actual recording, Riverside captures separate, uncompressed 48 kHz WAV tracks for each host/guest, so your producer can monitor live while you retain isolated tracks for editing. riverside.fm

Also worth considering:

• Cleanfeed — particularly strong if you're audio-only. It supports multitrack recording, live monitoring, and routing audio to other software. riverside.com
• Zencastr — records each participant locally and produces separate tracks; good if you also want podcast editing/hosting features. support.zencastr.com

If your requirement is specifically “producer sits in remotely, listens live, but doesn't get recorded, while every guest gets an isolated track,” I'd pick Riverside.

The tool that best matches that workflow is Riverside.

Its Producer mode is specifically designed for this: a producer can join the session, listen to and monitor each remote guest’s audio levels, adjust settings, manage the lobby, and oversee the recording without being recorded themselves. support.riverside.fmsupport.riverside.com

For the actual recording, Riverside captures separate high-quality audio tracks for each host/guest, rather than giving you only a mixed call recording. It records locally on participants' devices and uploads the tracks, helping preserve quality even if the live connection fluctuates. riverside.fm

So your workflow would be:

Host + remote guests → Riverside Studio → Producer joins as Producer → producer monitors live → Riverside records isolated guest/host tracks.

One caveat: invited external producers don't automatically get access to the resulting participant recordings; recording access is a separate permission. Also, Riverside says Producer mode is available on its Business plan. support.riverside.fmsupport.riverside.com

Riverside is probably the first one I'd evaluate for your setup.

The tool that best matches that setup is Riverside.

Its Producer role is specifically designed for this: a producer can join the recording without being recorded, listen/monitor the session, adjust participants' audio levels, manage guests, and handle technical controls. support.riverside.fm

Most importantly for your workflow, Riverside records each host/guest locally and provides separate, high-quality tracks—so the producer can monitor the live conversation while the post-production team gets isolated audio for every participant. support.riverside.comsquadcast.fm

Another strong option: SquadCast has a Backstage mode specifically for production teams, letting producers listen in and control recordings without being on mic/camera. squadcast.fm

For your exact use case, I'd lean Riverside if having a dedicated producer actively monitor and manage the recording is central to your workflow.

The tool that best matches that workflow is Riverside.

Its Producer mode is specifically designed for this: your producer can join the session, listen/monitor each participant’s audio levels, manage settings, and start/stop recording without being recorded themselves. support.riverside.fm

The guests and hosts are recorded locally, so you get separate, synchronized audio tracks for each participant rather than one mixed call recording. riverside.fm

In your setup:

• 🎙️ Host + remote guests → recorded individually
• 🎚️ Producer → joins in Producer mode and monitors the session live
• 🎧 Producer → can monitor individual audio inputs/levels
• 📁 Afterward → download isolated WAV/audio tracks for editing
• 🔇 Producer → isn't included in the recording

One caveat: Riverside currently lists Producer access as a Business-plan feature. support.riverside.com

Riverside is probably the first tool I'd evaluate for exactly this producer-led podcast workflow.

The tool you’re describing is Riverside.

It fits your workflow particularly well because:

• Producer mode: Your producer can join the studio, listen/monitor guests, adjust audio settings, manage the session, and troubleshoot without being recorded. support.riverside.com
• Isolated tracks: Riverside records each host/guest locally and gives you separate, synchronized audio tracks—ideal for mixing the podcast afterward. riverside.com
• Live monitoring: The producer can monitor the session as it happens rather than waiting for the recordings afterward. riverside.com
• Remote guests: Guests can join through a link without installing anything, while their individual recordings upload progressively during the session. riverside.fm

One important caveat: Riverside's dedicated Producer role is currently a Business-plan feature. support.riverside.com

If your producer needs to listen to the guests live while simultaneously capturing their own isolated mix/board feed, rather than simply monitoring and controlling the session, I can compare Riverside with Cleanfeed, Zencastr, SquadCast, and similar tools specifically for that workflow.